Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

“Let Them All Talk” is superb!

Though it may strike some as claustrophobic and compartmentalized, “Let Them All Talk” speaks to and is somewhat representative of the current era we are living in, which finds us sandwiched between a global pandemic and political mayhem, and has left most of us feeling suffocated and closed off from the world, each other, and even ourselves. Along with Spike Lee’s severely underrated “Da 5 Bloods,” this is one of the best films of the year, and one of the best films Meryl Streep has been a part of in over a decade, maybe more.

Streep’s performance as Alice Hughes, an affected and effected celebrated author at the cusp of true physical and metaphysical transcendence, is sublimely subtle, reflective, and moving, though never pandering, Alice is the kind of woman who would, as she herself admits to her nephew toward the end of the film, spend her time “polishing the vase when the house is falling down.” This is a quietly heartbreaking turn by Streep and already ranks as a favorite of mine.

Dianne Wiest and Candace Bergen are equally brilliant as her estranged friends, the former comforting and contemplative, the latter spiteful and vengeful. Bergen illuminates the pain, regret, and flaws of her character, Roberta, with dark wit and sensitivity, reminding us, especially during a scene in which her character desperately attempts to capitalize on a stolen journal, of the fine line between victim and assailant; humanist and capitalist. She is superb.

Wiest’s Susan is an empathic and generous friend with a withheld truth and opinion of her own, and the actress conveys acres of wisdom with just a glance. During a pivotal moment in the film, she stops the increasingly tense dinner proceedings to point out how far removed and detached from reality we have become: “Do you even know what happened yesterday, when we were out of communication with the world?” she asks. “Elon Musk sent many, many telecom satellites into the sky that look exactly like stars… So now, when humans gaze at the sky, they won’t know if they’re gazing at a star or at a machine, and we, at this table - at this very little table - we are among the last, the very last ever to have seen the actual real, the honest, truthful night sky from the ocean. We saw stars; just stars.” It is a moment that thrusts you into a contemplative state that lingers.

The rest of the cast is excellent, too, as are the production values, and Steven Soderbergh directs this with confidence, subtlety, and grace.

In the end, “Let Them All Talk” is really a sensitive rumination on emergence: the emergence of truth, of the spite and vengeance, of the humanist and capitalist, of the pain and regret, and ultimately, of the life and love in us all.

“It’s impossible for me not to think, ‘What a miracle it is that this universe emerged. What a miracle it is that consciousness emerged,’” declares Streep’s Alice halfway through, and in a perfectly placed flashback, at the end of the film. To paraphrase her character, what a miracle it is that this film, with its totally improvised dialogue and cast of brilliantly sensitive actors baring the truths and experiences of their characters so purely, could reach across time and space and my television screen, and reach into my heart and consciousness. That is a miracle; one that I blissfully welcome during these oppressive and unpredictable times.

by Anonymousreply 97June 1, 2024 10:36 PM

How naked does Lucas Hedges get?

by Anonymousreply 1December 10, 2020 10:06 PM

R1 Not at all. I found him so desirable, though... I’m confused!

by Anonymousreply 2December 10, 2020 10:08 PM

That's not a review from a critic. That's either a Streep cultist or a producer shill.

by Anonymousreply 3December 10, 2020 10:27 PM

R3 Bitch, please.

by Anonymousreply 4December 10, 2020 10:28 PM

Damn it! I forgot to reference another one of my favorite quotes in my review.

Alice:

[quote]I think attraction is the animating force of the universe...like gravity or the pull of the poles or what pulls the monarch butterfly to fly across the world... If you feel attracted to someone from your heart, and you look at them and you feel you can see their soul, that’s... There is no bad version of that. To be a part of that, we should...oh God, we should treasure it. We’re lucky to have that feeling. It’s the greatest - it’s the *fullest* expression of what it is to be alive.

Fuck. I can’t believe this movie was entirely improvised.

by Anonymousreply 5December 10, 2020 11:42 PM

It’s a remarkable film and I can’t believe the dialogue was improvised. Everyone is in top form but Bergen is sublime. It’s probably the best work she’s ever done. The ending caught me by surprise and it’s quite moving.

by Anonymousreply 6December 11, 2020 5:48 AM

R6 Finally!

“Sid speaks!”

by Anonymousreply 7December 11, 2020 6:07 AM

So far it has a Metascore of 75 and a User Review average of 5.7 on IMDB Just Saying. Haven't seen it though I disagree with the OPs assessment of Da 5 Bloods which was bloody awful!

by Anonymousreply 8December 11, 2020 6:17 AM

R8 ...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 9December 11, 2020 6:19 AM

Snoozefest! Lifetime could have done it better!

Pseudo-sophisticate pâté.

by Anonymousreply 10December 11, 2020 10:22 PM

I really appreciated your review, OP, and I agreed with it. I loved it. I found it pretty funny early on but was sort of knocked for a loop with the emotional ending, and I felt Streep's character. When she said, "oh, I thought this was about love, and it was about money. I didn't know. I'll write you a check." - you felt more for her character than for the bitterness of Rowena/Roberta. I thought Gemma Chan was really lovely in this, too.

by Anonymousreply 11December 12, 2020 11:19 PM

R11 omg, yes! That scene was so good. She was fantastic in it.

by Anonymousreply 12December 12, 2020 11:23 PM

Also, Gemma Chan was luminous in her one emotional scene.

by Anonymousreply 13December 12, 2020 11:23 PM

Gemma is a gem.

by Anonymousreply 14December 12, 2020 11:28 PM

Worst movie ever. Dull. Boring. Fragmented. Pathetic. Meandering.

by Anonymousreply 15December 14, 2020 12:51 AM

Leave it to MEryl to spearhead a production on a cruise during a pandemic. Classic MEryl.

by Anonymousreply 16December 14, 2020 12:56 AM

candice bergen is great

the rest is shit

by Anonymousreply 17December 14, 2020 12:58 AM

I think I'll see this anyway but the quotes used to illustrate how awesome it is are a little Live Love Laugh.

by Anonymousreply 18December 14, 2020 1:11 AM

I find it exquisitely profound. Not much happens and yet, everything happens. I’ve begun to study it now; its nuances, subtleties, and symbolism.

Alice recounting her dream in which a deceased friend visited her. “This is how we will communicate now.” Alice wanders into the bright-white crew corridor... The green velvet, the married man’s hand and ring, the bees...

The frozen pea hearted won’t get it...

Oh, but I - [bold]I[/bold] - do.

An exquisite morsel of meditation and grace.

by Anonymousreply 19December 14, 2020 1:29 AM

And I want a Criterion release.

by Anonymousreply 20December 14, 2020 1:39 AM

Lange's Bitch, u gotta be trolling.

by Anonymousreply 21December 14, 2020 2:33 AM

R21 No, I’m not.

by Anonymousreply 22December 14, 2020 2:35 AM

R22 OK. Convince me. Because this is cheeseball. Like it's slightly concealed cheeseball, all these big names have given it a middlebrow coating, but it's still basically fromage. How are you so taken by this quote in particular? Like do you just love this? Is this exact thing your 'thing'? Because I'll accept that if it is. But if you genuinely think this is profoundly meaningful I think you need to read more books.

This is what I'm referring to:

I think attraction is the animating force of the universe...like gravity or the pull of the poles or what pulls the monarch butterfly to fly across the world... If you feel attracted to someone from your heart, and you look at them and you feel you can see their soul, that’s... There is no bad version of that. To be a part of that, we should...oh God, we should treasure it. We’re lucky to have that feeling. It’s the greatest - it’s the *fullest* expression of what it is to be alive.

by Anonymousreply 23December 14, 2020 2:42 AM

To clarify, R21, I think the pandemic, growing older, and the sensory overload of the last decade or two has made me really appreciate this film in a way I might not have a decade ago, while still mired in superficiality, the vagaries of youth, the hunt for the next big cheap thrill, and an addiction to avoid the passage of time and of permanency.

As a comedy and even a drama, it is a very subdued film. It hit me upon my first watch but has hit me harder and in waves upon subsequent rewatches.

by Anonymousreply 24December 14, 2020 2:45 AM

Well like I said I already wanted to see it and still will but those quotes are just nothing special to me. Which - I mean, I don't mistake my own opinion for fact so your take is as valid as mine.

by Anonymousreply 25December 14, 2020 2:51 AM

R23 I find your bewilderment sexy.

Regarding the quote, much of it we’ve heard before and arguably articulated better. What struck me and still strikes me about that quote, however, is the line:

[quote]There is no bad version of that.

When I heard it, it was like “BAM!” and then I saw stars. It’s a swathe of a quote, a whispered truth, that you simply must take into meditation and contemplation. The weight of it, the profundity...

That’s our problem; we always think every version of “that,” in hindsight, is wrong or flawed because it didn’t turn out as we expected or wanted it to.

by Anonymousreply 26December 14, 2020 2:51 AM

Also, Meryl is transcendent in it. She made me feel familiar feelings again... like when I first watched her in “Bridges...” at fourteen.

by Anonymousreply 27December 14, 2020 2:58 AM

You find bewilderment sexy, eh? Well you better reach for the lube, bud. lol.

I totally get you btw. Like I get that BAM - I really, truly do and I love when that happens to me. That instant recognition of the truth in a single line of poetry or prose or even a shot from a movie or a still photo etc. But I don't understand why you've chosen the quotes you've chosen because to me they're reading slightly twee. And I thought the "no bad version of that" was the worst part of it!

This probably doesn't matter. It's struck a chord in you and not in me. I've had the same thing happen something strikes me a certain way and I show someone else and they're like 'wat?' and they don't get it.

Describe the emotion(s) it makes you feel. Is it nostalgia? Even better, is it saudade? It seems to be making you think back on your lost youth.

Have you ever seen the Richard Linklater-directed Before trilogy? I feel like you should.

Also thank you for not getting mad because I don't like the thing that you like. That's a rare and excellent quality to have.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 28December 14, 2020 3:12 AM

R28 [quote]I don't understand why you've chosen the quotes you've chosen because to me they're reading slightly twee.

Because I find them profound and epiphanic; thought provoking. (Simplicity isn’t always indicative of simple-mindedness; and cliches oft-repeated are really Truth – singular and with a capital “T” – disguised in the rags of familiarity.) I find them grace-filled, not twee, though there can be a fine line between the two. Perhaps the fact that they were improvised, along with the stellar performances behind them, elevates them for me.

Those lines by Streep regarding attraction and emergence, and that bit by Wiest regarding the stars, really made the film for me. They make me feel…awareness, in the greatest sense of the word.

I suppose the pandemic and surrounding political chaos have me in a very specific mood and not necessarily a bad one as much as a reflective and contemplative one.

[quote]Describe the emotion(s) it makes you feel. Is it nostalgia? Even better, is it saudade? It seems to be making you think back on your lost youth.

I love that you brought up saudade but no, it doesn’t make me feel that nor nostalgia; nor does it make me think back on “lost youth.” (What am I, Blanche DuBois?)

It makes me feel…reconhecido and distilled; grateful, hopeful, and awestruck - all at once. It also makes me feel supremely conscious of the passage and rapidity of time; of the evanescence of life, but not in a sad or even bittersweet way; well, maybe a little bittersweet. It makes me feel metanoia, in the Jungian sense.

It recalls, for me, that great line by Keaton in “Marvin’s Room”: “I've been so lucky to have been able to love…so much.” It also reminds me of those closing pieces – “Can Light Be Found in the Darkness” and “When Our Wings Are Cut” – by Gustavo Santaolalla for “21 Grams,” and of the film itself, too, actually.

[quote]Have you ever seen the Richard Linklater-directed Before trilogy? I feel like you should.

Yes. They’re okay.

[quote]Also thank you for not getting mad because I don't like the thing that you like. That's a rare and excellent quality to have.

You’re welcome. I could tell your curiosity and bewilderment were sincere (and adorable) and I responded accordingly. I hope, once you watch the film, that you like it and get something similar to what I have gotten from it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 29December 14, 2020 5:38 AM

Some poster is near death!

by Anonymousreply 30December 14, 2020 5:47 AM

R30 😂

by Anonymousreply 31December 14, 2020 5:50 AM

Actually, we all are, R30; we all are.

by Anonymousreply 32December 14, 2020 5:51 AM

Also, this song conjures up what the film makes me feel.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 33December 14, 2020 7:36 PM

The film made me think of an early Margaret Atwood novel. It was wonderfully done.

by Anonymousreply 34December 14, 2020 9:44 PM

OMG. I never got through the lunch (dinner?) at the beginning of the film. I don't need to see Streep being pretentious. I see enough of that bullshit IRL.

by Anonymousreply 35December 14, 2020 10:05 PM

Plotless.

by Anonymousreply 36December 14, 2020 10:08 PM

Well at least Dianne Wiest is working.

by Anonymousreply 37December 14, 2020 10:27 PM

R35 If you give it a chance, you will so how wonderfully her character and performance blossom.

by Anonymousreply 38December 14, 2020 10:43 PM

Oh dear.

"Effected" is a verb that means "made it happen". How can a character be "affected and effected"?

by Anonymousreply 39December 15, 2020 1:14 AM

[quote] The green velvet, the married man’s hand and ring, the bees...

Were those images that were referenced earlier in the film? Or images from her life flashing by her in the end? That part confused me.

by Anonymousreply 40December 15, 2020 3:25 AM

R39 Oh, dear. Watch the movie.

by Anonymousreply 41December 15, 2020 8:53 AM

The movie must be marvellous indeed if it makes a verb into an adjective.

by Anonymousreply 42December 15, 2020 11:21 AM

R42 I was making a distinction between Alice’s “artificial, pretentious, and designed to impress” demeanor and the fact that she has both “cause[d] (something) to happen; [brought] about” and has been “brought about” due to her decisions and various changes.

Also:

[quote] When something has been effected, it's been brought about. If you're responsible for an effected change, you've made it happen. If you know that when choosing between affect and effect, effect is almost always a noun, then you'll appreciate that effected is a bit of a rare bird. The verb form of the "e" word means "to bring about," [bold]and it can act as an adjective in its -ed form[/bold]: "The effected change in the garden while I've been away is far beyond what I'd hoped."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43December 15, 2020 11:42 AM

I really enjoyed it. My only quibble was with the Diane W storyline; it started out strong and then ended up in fantasyland. Otherwise, a great movie.

by Anonymousreply 44December 15, 2020 11:54 AM

R44 You mean the bit about her partnering with the author? I liked it, but I get what you mean.

by Anonymousreply 45December 18, 2020 11:15 AM

R28 I anxiously await your take on the film, btw.

by Anonymousreply 46December 18, 2020 11:16 AM

people spend too much time trying to find the goodness in a movie because meryl happened to be in it.

it was a shit movie. she was a shit actress. there was a shit script. and this is a shit thread about it.

by Anonymousreply 47December 18, 2020 11:59 AM

R47 No, it seems to me you just have shit on and [italic]in[/italic] the brain.

by Anonymousreply 48December 18, 2020 1:08 PM

The movie is shockingly blah considering the talent involved.

by Anonymousreply 49December 18, 2020 1:25 PM

r48, you can stop trying to blow meryl from your keyboard

by Anonymousreply 50December 18, 2020 4:49 PM

I watched the movie today and was thoroughly underwhelmed. The biggest problem is the lack of a screenplay. For all the talent of this cast, improvisation isn’t one of them. Wiest and Bergen come off the best of the main four actors, but there’s nothing nomination-worthy from either of them—there were no layers at all. Streep and Hedges are simply bad. I can only think that Soderbergh was terrified of Streep or had his tongue buried so far up her ass he couldn’t see what was and wasn’t happening.

by Anonymousreply 51December 20, 2020 10:43 PM

Hey, no spoilers! Whether this film is all that or meh, I'd like to see it for myself.

by Anonymousreply 52December 20, 2020 11:48 PM

Then stay off a thread that has existed as many weeks as when it came out.

M dies.

by Anonymousreply 53December 20, 2020 11:54 PM

I thought the dynamic between the writer of whodunits (writing as entertainment) and Streep's character (writing as Literature with a capital "L") was interesting--particularly the Q&A session of Streep's talk. Also, the role of commerce in any kind of writing kind of seeped into each of the character's story arc. There's no plot to speak of, but I don't think having one was the point of the film. I didn't love the film, but it kept me interested, and the ending definitely sheds a completely different light on everything leading up to it.

by Anonymousreply 54December 21, 2020 12:42 AM

Hyperbole much, OP? I need to take a shower to wash that slime off.

by Anonymousreply 55December 21, 2020 12:49 AM

R52: the spoiler is it's dreadfully dull and nothing happens.

by Anonymousreply 56December 21, 2020 3:20 PM

Lucas Hedges is adorable in this. I got a kick out of Candice’s character on the hunt for a rich man. Gemma Chan is very pretty.

by Anonymousreply 57December 22, 2020 7:31 AM

I’ve never been on a cruise but I assume they are not all that fancy, it made me want to take one

by Anonymousreply 58December 22, 2020 7:34 AM

I want to come inside Lucas Hedges.

There, I said it.

by Anonymousreply 59December 22, 2020 7:37 AM

It’s extremely stilted as the dialogue is mostly improv and these are not actors who are equipped to improvise, and that includes Meryl. It would have been fine if there was an actual script.

by Anonymousreply 60December 22, 2020 1:19 PM

Improv doesn't mean that they filmed the first take on every scene. I'm sure there was time to rework the "improv" until they thought they had a workable scene. This doesn't seem that different from the way any script is developed.

by Anonymousreply 61December 22, 2020 1:26 PM

I might give it another try.

It just seemed very dull. And the improv was bad in some early scenes, particularly one with Meryl Streep and Lucas Hedges when she asked him what happened after she left her friends at dinner the night before. He responded, all agitated, "I don't know, I went home," which is a weird thing to say on a cruise in the middle of the ocean. She seemed thrown and just said something like "You went home, why did you go home? I need you to watch my friends so I can find out what's going on with them!" It was unrealistic and stupid and there was no sense that they were an aunt and nephew or real-life people in any way.

by Anonymousreply 62December 22, 2020 1:40 PM

R62 Give it another try. And the “home” slip-up is actually quite realistic if you think about it.

by Anonymousreply 63December 22, 2020 1:45 PM

Yes R61, and even after multiple takes and edits, uncomfortable actors were stumbling over their thoughts and stuttering through sentences. You could tell that Bergen hated it, and that shows in her post film interviews. I thought Wiest handled it best, probably because she had so much Woody Allen experience. She’s always great though. Meryl was very hit or miss. The consistent improv issue serves only to take the viewer out of the film. It was amazing to me that Soderbergh, a very gifted filmmaker, didn’t see this, or maybe didn’t care enough.

by Anonymousreply 64December 22, 2020 1:54 PM

What “consistent improv issues”?

Jesus, it sounds like you just wanted them to sound scripted.

by Anonymousreply 65December 22, 2020 2:09 PM

this got very mediocre reviews and nothing Ive read here has made me want to watch it, if that was the goal. that monarch butterfly quote makes me gag just a tiny bit

"Alice recounting her dream in which a deceased friend visited her. “This is how we will communicate now.” Alice wanders into the bright-white crew corridor" -- does Soderbergh actually know anyone who has died? cause this is not how it works. the dreams are generally very mundane, or else they're unsettling and sad.

I think he's been in decline for years, so other s may love it. for gods sake M. needs a real script to work with, tho

by Anonymousreply 66December 22, 2020 2:39 PM

72 on MetaCritic and 89% on Rotten Tomatoes are hardly mediocre aggregate scores.

by Anonymousreply 67December 22, 2020 2:57 PM

Streep never ceases to amaze me: pre-eminent actress who gets offered anything and everything and THIS is what she picks?

by Anonymousreply 68December 22, 2020 3:00 PM

I dont know if you have some interest in publicizing this thing, but if youd actually read any of those "positive" reviews, youd know theyre mediocre.

rotten tomatoes assigns yes or no to each review, it doesnt mean the movie is getting raves. They've also changed their system for designating top critics, so a chunk of those positive reviews are some ignorant bitch with a film blog. who probably also liked chicken soup for the middle aged lady soul, which you should check out

by Anonymousreply 69December 22, 2020 3:01 PM

R69 It’s obvious you’re just an acerbic, embittered cunt probably well in the throes of late-middle-age yourself.

by Anonymousreply 70December 22, 2020 3:04 PM

what the fuck dude @ R67, youve written half of this thread

I take it all back-- youre either truly a publicist, or truly obsessed with M. in which case, enjoy the movie

by Anonymousreply 71December 22, 2020 3:05 PM

R71 Thanks. I take both as a compliment.

by Anonymousreply 72December 22, 2020 3:06 PM

R70 has written 35 out of 70 of these posts

I never argue with the truly psychotic. keep working on that M. skin, buddy, things will look better soon

by Anonymousreply 73December 22, 2020 3:07 PM

lol, sitting pretty at 38? more like fat and wrinkling as your balls sag further and futher

by Anonymousreply 74December 22, 2020 3:09 PM

R73 It’s called replying to responses. And why are you mentioning skin? 😂

Are you going to ask me to “put the lotion in the basket” next?

by Anonymousreply 75December 22, 2020 3:09 PM

yes, please do keep replying to everyone.

and that was a stupid comeback at R75, because I had already made that joke at your expense. you need to pivot to another joke, or say something snappier in reply. and you walked right into that middle aged joke that I made.

by Anonymousreply 76December 22, 2020 3:14 PM

R76 Oh, dear.

by Anonymousreply 77December 22, 2020 3:18 PM

The extra weight helped Candice's face look less wrinkly, although I assume she has had work done

by Anonymousreply 78December 22, 2020 10:22 PM

Seeing Meryl in a film with her acting and generational peers (a rarity her whole career), really reinforces how little charisma she has. I'm not denying she's a great actress, but Candice Bergen and Dianne Wiest could make reading a phone book entertaining...while Meryl would make it seem like a Pentacostal church service (simulataneously entertaining and boring).

by Anonymousreply 79December 24, 2020 5:50 PM

Where can we watch if we don't have HBO Max?

by Anonymousreply 80December 24, 2020 5:55 PM

I thought the music was exceptional too. Wonderful score.

by Anonymousreply 81December 26, 2020 9:51 PM

I thought I would hate it. Too twee or something. Though it had instances of that, over all I loved it. I thought Bergen was by far the strongest. She was just fantastic.

by Anonymousreply 82December 26, 2020 9:57 PM

I love Candice Bergen, but her character felt a little one-note to me.

by Anonymousreply 83December 26, 2020 9:58 PM

I streamed it on one of those 123movie sites.

Loved the scene between M and Candice Bergen. Hated the ending, but I'm still thinking about it 24 hours later, so I guess Soderbergh did his job.

by Anonymousreply 84January 6, 2021 2:36 AM

This movie was LITERAL VIOLENCE!

[quote]i saw let them all talk and... are ppl really making movies in 2021 about white people who do a trans Atlantic Crossing and where the only two characters of color are sexualized and then relegated to healing roles? yes they are.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 85January 6, 2021 3:41 AM

It was a snooze.

by Anonymousreply 86January 6, 2021 4:05 AM

I just watched this movie and I really liked it a lot. It was much better than I expected, I think, because character-driven movies like this are so rare these days. TV seems to be better than feature film much of the tike nowadays, and even HBO, which used to be consistently great, released the schlocky The Undoing last year and punctured the faith I had in the network.

I disliked Streep's character as a person, but she wasnmt irredeemably bad, just tedious. Wiest's character was an interestingly sweet, daft but not dumb woman. Bergen's character was written in a quietly hilarious way, being so desperate in her search for a man with money that she was overt about it. The relationship with the nephew was moving and it showed Streep's character's humanity. The thing with the nephew and the agent seemed like it was borrowed from another storyline, but I enjoyed it anyway.

I have an MFA in creative writing, and Streep's character reminded me *very much* of some of the personalities among faculty and other writers I've known. It rang true to me, as much of a caricature anyone may think she was depicting at times. Really, everything about the way she was written and how Streep portrayed her felt real to me. I admired many of my instructors and I valued what they said but I often wanted to run out of a room when they were in it performing as their writerly selves. I had the same feeling much of the time when Streep was on camera.

by Anonymousreply 87February 8, 2021 10:30 AM

Still holds up beautifully as a rumination on life for our plague-ridden times.

by Anonymousreply 88May 30, 2021 8:22 PM

"Let All My Female Co-Stars Be Fat."

by Anonymousreply 89November 13, 2022 5:36 PM

The ghost of Edna St. Vincent Millay is all over this thread. Beat it, bitch.

by Anonymousreply 90November 13, 2022 5:52 PM

[quote]r60 It’s extremely stilted as the dialogue is mostly improv and these are not actors who are equipped to improvise, and that includes Meryl. It would have been fine if there was an actual script.

There was a script. No one is improvising in the moment.

30% of the scenes (the key ones) were written before the film was cast. The other scenes - which had been previously outlined for content - were improvised in rehearsal, but then scripted by a screenwriter afterwards using some things the actors had done.

No one ultimately went before the camera without scripted dialogue.

by Anonymousreply 91December 25, 2022 2:51 AM

I'm watching it now—very funny in a low-key way.

by Anonymousreply 92January 16, 2023 5:05 AM

It just occurred to me that this would have made a great Christopher Guest mockumentary.

by Anonymousreply 93January 16, 2023 5:08 AM

This shit wasn't superb

by Anonymousreply 94January 16, 2023 6:16 AM

I watched this for the novelty of it all being improvised, and was very surprised at how good and affecting it was. I loved the end and Gemma Chan.

by Anonymousreply 95January 16, 2023 8:20 AM

Did Roberta specifically blame Alice for her ending up in retail?

by Anonymousreply 96January 16, 2023 8:31 AM

I don’t know how I feel about it. I think the acting is superb, especially Meryl and Candice. However, the dialogue is subpar and not realistic. I know 70% of it was improvised with a coach, but it makes the characters disjointed. At least they acted with their faces.

by Anonymousreply 97June 1, 2024 10:36 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!