Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Queen's granddaughter Zara Tindall pregnant again

Interesting, Zara's husband, the international rugby player Mike (who announced the news on his podcast), seems to have finally fixed his nose so it no longer hideously crooked (from getting smashed up in a game, no doubt).

Zara is the child of Princess Anne and Anne's first husband, Mark Phillips.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 104December 12, 2020 6:32 PM

I'd let him breed me.

by Anonymousreply 1December 9, 2020 7:37 PM

That's what I decided, r1. And it worked!

by Anonymousreply 2December 9, 2020 7:45 PM

Queen Zara

by Anonymousreply 3December 9, 2020 7:49 PM

But seriously....I would SO let him breed me

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4December 9, 2020 8:40 PM

Zara can never be queen because Princess Anne removed herself and all her descendants from the line of succession.

by Anonymousreply 5December 9, 2020 8:51 PM

Lucky Zara.

by Anonymousreply 6December 9, 2020 9:34 PM

She’s not half bad looking for coming from that line of Clydesdales.

by Anonymousreply 7December 9, 2020 9:37 PM

[quote] Zara can never be queen because Princess Anne removed herself and all her descendants from the line of succession.

Anne is 14th in line and Zara 18th. Zara's girls are 19th and 20th.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 8December 9, 2020 9:41 PM

There was an article in one of the papers about his nose. Apparently he's broken it eight times and couldn't breathe through it anymore.

by Anonymousreply 9December 9, 2020 9:59 PM

Despite Anne's children, Peter and Zara) not having titles, they are still in line of succession for the throne...and the children of Peter and Zara are in line for succession as well. The throne is far beyond their reach; however, they are still in line of succession since they are descendants of the monarch.

by Anonymousreply 10December 9, 2020 10:16 PM

If I were her, I'd be on his dick constantly. He's breakfast, lunch, and dinner, that one.

by Anonymousreply 11December 9, 2020 10:27 PM

No, Princess Anne did NOT remove herself and her descendants from the line of succession. She declined titles for them. That doesn't get you out of the line. Anne remains in the line and so do her descendants, just well down as Charles and his children and grandchildren and her other two brothers and their children and grandchildren are ahead of her and her descendants.

by Anonymousreply 12December 9, 2020 10:34 PM

The line of succession is determined by laws that are passed by Parliament. The most pertinent laws are (1) the 1701 Act of Settlement, which declared the the heirs of the body of Electress Sophia of Hanover, granddaughter of King James VI and I, to be inheritors of the crown following male primogeniture and excluding Catholics or those who marry Catholics, (2) the 1772 Royal Marriages Act, that required that descendants of the Electress Sophia, except the descendants of princesses who marry into other royal houses, to obtain permission of the monarch to engage in a marriage, and (3) the 2013 Act of Succession to the Throne that removed male primogeniture, made people married to Catholics eligible to inherit the crown, and limited the terms of the Royal Marriages Act to just the first six persons in the line of succession. Anne cannot "opt out" for her children. It would take an Act of Parliament to remove them. Anne indicated that she would prefer that her husband not be given a peerage and thus kept her children from having a title. That has no effect on their place in the line of succession.

by Anonymousreply 13December 9, 2020 10:36 PM

Some men just have "it" . By "it" I mean that look of pure animal sex . I bet when he walks in a room women get moist immediately . I bet they could bottle his pheromones and make a fortune. Obviously hes potent as hell too .

by Anonymousreply 14December 9, 2020 10:36 PM

R5 - Google is your friend. Look up the line of succession. You'll see Anne. Peter and Zara and their children listed.

by Anonymousreply 15December 9, 2020 10:37 PM

I wonder if it's been established enough yet that r5 is wrong.

by Anonymousreply 16December 9, 2020 10:39 PM

[quote] Some men just have "it" . By "it" I mean that look of pure animal sex . I bet when he walks in a room women get moist immediately . I bet they could bottle his pheromones and make a fortune. Obviously hes potent as hell too .

Mary!

by Anonymousreply 17December 9, 2020 10:39 PM

And fyi, Autumn Kelly converted to Anglicanism from Catholicism upon her marriage to Anne's son precisely to keep their children in the line, regardless of how unlikely their succession was.

by Anonymousreply 18December 9, 2020 10:41 PM

Oh FFS R5 don’t make stuff up - you only look stupid. And you obviously need no help in that department.

by Anonymousreply 19December 9, 2020 10:43 PM

R16 - Even money he posts ir again on the thread announcing the boy's birth. My guess is they akready know it's a boy or he wouldn't have let on about wanting a son this time, or he'd look really shitty if it were another girl.

So HM stands to see three more great grandchildren in 2021, bringing the total to 12 (Eugenie, Zara, and of course we know Meghan is up the duff again. Hence the 9-month trial delay.

12 great grandchildren. Jesus.

by Anonymousreply 20December 9, 2020 10:48 PM

Timdall is super hot. Any nudes of him?

by Anonymousreply 21December 9, 2020 10:57 PM

I adore Zara. She was a member of the 2012 olympic equestrian team who were silver medallists.

by Anonymousreply 22December 9, 2020 11:03 PM

There are nudes out there, R21, from his rugby playing days. Rear view only but no complaints from me.

And before anybody complains - JFGI - I’m busy.

by Anonymousreply 23December 9, 2020 11:10 PM

[quote]Google is your friend. Look up the line of succession. You'll see Anne. Peter and Zara and their children listed.

R15. The point of DL is to have a discussion. We don't have to tell someone "look it up" or "Google is your friend." R5 didn't know, so he made an incorrect assumption. (And I am not R5). As I said, the point of DL is to have discussion or correct something that is wrong. Unless someone's response is so obvious or bone-headed, you can just explain the correct answer. The response doesn't have to be a bitchy, dick-wilting "Google it."

by Anonymousreply 24December 9, 2020 11:16 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25December 9, 2020 11:16 PM

R24 if you state something stupid as fact, people are gonna dump on you.

by Anonymousreply 26December 9, 2020 11:18 PM

She was as much a rebel as Harry, minus the nudity.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 27December 9, 2020 11:22 PM

Zara looks like Glenn Close.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 28December 9, 2020 11:32 PM

I wonder if they deliberately tried certain techniques and positions while fucking to maximize the chances of having a boy child.

by Anonymousreply 29December 9, 2020 11:38 PM

R29 She's 39 and they're rich as piss, it'll be IVF.

by Anonymousreply 30December 9, 2020 11:40 PM

R39 what does being rich have to do with IVF? Oh, of course - you’re American.

by Anonymousreply 31December 10, 2020 1:21 AM

IVF is covered by American insurance r31. I think the poster was alluding to the fact that aging, wealthier women choose IVF out of vanity.

by Anonymousreply 32December 10, 2020 1:24 AM

What’s the point of having a guy like that if you won’t let him pound some cum deep inside you?

by Anonymousreply 33December 10, 2020 1:50 AM

Do shut up, R31. Most NHS Trusts don't offer IVF to people who already have two children, and none offer sex selection without clinical need.

by Anonymousreply 34December 10, 2020 3:14 AM

[Quote]the fact that aging, wealthier women choose IVF out of vanity.

Um. I don't think so. IVF can be arduous and result in multiple fertilized eggs. One reason some women like Octmom and Kate Gosselin have litters. IVF can also be done with donor eggs and the fertilized egg implanted into a surrogate. I think you're referring to surrogacy which some older (or not so older) women do to preserve their figures and not have to deal with being pregnant.

I believe surrogacy is what poster above thread intended to say, but it's a moot point since it's illegal in the UK.

by Anonymousreply 35December 10, 2020 3:33 AM

I meant IVF for a surrogate r35.

by Anonymousreply 36December 10, 2020 3:46 AM

Glad to make the distinction between IVF and surrogacy that r30 confused and made a totally moot point since surrogacy, for all intents and purposes, doesn't happen in the UK.

[Quote]In the UK, surrogacy is legal but it cannot be advertised or commercialised, meaning you are not allowed to pay someone to be your surrogate, or advertise surrogacy as a service.

I have a hard time believing the earthy, athletic horsewoman granddaughter of the Queen would seek out a better egg or vessel than her provisions 😆.

by Anonymousreply 37December 10, 2020 4:58 AM

Ew her husband is such a fug. She could have done so much better.

by Anonymousreply 38December 10, 2020 5:20 AM

Here's a photo of Mike's old crooked nose. He's got a good sense of humor and gives lively interviews. He said that it took six weeks for the RF to notice that he had finally gotten his nose fixed.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 39December 10, 2020 5:27 AM

Mike said that once on Christmas Day with the RF, he came down the stairs wearing an ugly Christmas suit to make the Queen laugh. The Queen enjoyed it so much that she insisted that he must always wear an ugly Christmas suit at the family gatherings on Christmas Day.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 40December 10, 2020 5:46 AM

R40, that can't be true! The BRF are evil and mean to outsiders!!

by Anonymousreply 41December 10, 2020 5:59 AM

He looks like he would throw a hot, dirty fuck. She must be totally addicted to his cock.

by Anonymousreply 42December 10, 2020 6:07 AM

The RF apparently likes whimsy and to give joke gifts at Christmas. Hence QE II's love of "Billy Big Mouth Bass." She reportedly ordered a few more.

[Quote]Queen Elizabeth keeps hers on the grand piano at Balmoral Castle. Billy has appeared on at least two national talk shows.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43December 10, 2020 6:12 AM

[quote] He looks like he would throw a hot, dirty fuck. She must be totally addicted to his cock.

Who? Zara, or her grandmother?

by Anonymousreply 44December 10, 2020 6:14 AM

All the good Windsor genes and sense apparently went to Anne and her children.

by Anonymousreply 45December 10, 2020 6:17 AM

His throbbing cock, barely contained by the Christmas suit's flimsy fabric showing VPL on Christmas morning, still slightly hard from insemination.

by Anonymousreply 46December 10, 2020 6:19 AM

I bet if a bomb went off front and centre at Trooping of the Color there would still be at least 300 British fuckers in the line of succession. It's like never ending.

by Anonymousreply 47December 10, 2020 6:23 AM

[quote] there would still be at least 300 British fuckers in the line of succession

Some of them are not British.

by Anonymousreply 48December 10, 2020 6:24 AM

[quote] All the good Windsor genes and sense apparently went to Anne and her children.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 49December 10, 2020 6:26 AM

Currently I am 157th in line to the British throne. I live in a squalid trailer park in Tampa. My feet are flat so I only wear flip flops.

by Anonymousreply 50December 10, 2020 6:26 AM

I want to invite him to the annual stallion and mare party in Gran Caneria. I'll be wearing the red cloak.

by Anonymousreply 51December 10, 2020 6:37 AM

R51, are you a stallion or mare?

by Anonymousreply 52December 10, 2020 6:45 AM

MARE-Y !!!

by Anonymousreply 53December 10, 2020 6:47 AM

That is one LUCKY woman .

by Anonymousreply 54December 10, 2020 7:07 AM

R47 I think it's unofficially calculated to 1300th place

by Anonymousreply 55December 10, 2020 8:02 AM

I'm 39 years old too and conceived my child naturally this year. Alas we lost the baby in July. You can find out more through my exclusive interview with the New York Times.

by Anonymousreply 56December 10, 2020 9:13 AM

^^ Are you OK?

by Anonymousreply 57December 10, 2020 9:35 AM

R47 - You act as if there is something unnatural about it. You have ancestors going back 300 places, too. They just don't happen to be the descendants of a still functioning hereditary monarchy.

Princess Michael's son, Lord Frederick Windsor (married to actress Sophie Winkleman) is 49th in line.

If a bomb went off and killed HM, the Cornwalls, and the Cambridges, you would only need to go back six places to . . . Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and Archie!!!!!!!

Because they aren't ever going to appear at the Trooping the Colour again. So unless their Montecito home disappears in one of the mudslides common to the area they live in now . . .

That's not so far back, now, is it?

by Anonymousreply 58December 10, 2020 12:47 PM

[quote]Zara looks like Glenn Close.

I could play her in a biopic, if the script feels like Oscar,

by Anonymousreply 59December 10, 2020 12:57 PM

Zara and Mike Tindall look like they're fun.

by Anonymousreply 60December 10, 2020 12:58 PM

The "Line of succession" is such bull shit talk.

This is the world's richest welfare family. They've created a mystique around them to make you think their constant grifting from taxpayers is actually a right

by Anonymousreply 61December 10, 2020 1:01 PM

In theory, aren't we all on the line of the succession to the British throne?

by Anonymousreply 62December 10, 2020 1:09 PM

"The "Line of succession" is such bull shit talk." - Why, r61?

They don't get taxpayer money because of some mystique (Zara doesn't get any at all). The Queen actually has a job - it's called head of state. Every country has a head of state.

by Anonymousreply 63December 10, 2020 1:15 PM

No, R62 - google the Electress Sophia.

by Anonymousreply 64December 10, 2020 1:28 PM

R61 always posts that. Every country needs a head a state somehow. I see royalty, while hilarious in concept, as a great alternative to the ugliness of politics. While not universally loved in the UK, the royal family attracts far less partisan views than the politicians. President Thatcher? President Blair? The institution is above politics, the mythology adds some frisson and the tradition adds some dignified colour. I'm fine with the structure, personally, while acknowledging the concept of royalty as it was a hundred and two hundred years ago is silly.

by Anonymousreply 65December 10, 2020 1:28 PM

Damn, he really needed that nose fixed.

They’d need to find a royal crowbar to pry me off that dick, freakish nose or not.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 66December 10, 2020 1:49 PM

R14 I’m in heat now!

by Anonymousreply 67December 10, 2020 2:04 PM

R65 I see the argument for having a Head of State who is apolitical. But what would happen if you had someone obnoxious like Harry ascend to the throne and you were stuck with him for decades?

by Anonymousreply 68December 10, 2020 4:05 PM

[quote]I'd let him breed me.

You'd let Trump, Louie Anderson and Roseanne Barr run a train on you.

by Anonymousreply 69December 10, 2020 4:16 PM

This is big news. Has anyone asked if Meghan's OK?

by Anonymousreply 70December 10, 2020 4:42 PM

She is exquisite, he's an irresistible bruiser. I like this branch of the royal family.

by Anonymousreply 71December 10, 2020 4:57 PM

Persons eligible to succeed to the British Throne as of 1 Jan 2011

5753 entries

Enjoy, bitches!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 72December 10, 2020 8:24 PM

R61 - I think you need to take a look at several other European monarchies, a couple of which are allegedly richer than the Windsors: the House of Orange (The Netherlands) which made its money off Royal Dutch Petroleum and then sold it, and whose jewellery dwarfs even that of QEII, and the Lichtensteins, who are allegedly the richest royals in Europe - richer than the Windsors and the Orange-Nassaus. The Danish royal family isn't too badly off, and we haven't even gotten to the House of Saud and the Gulf sultans . . .

What makes you think they operate any differently from the Windsors? How do the Windsors come out as the greatest welfare family on earth in company like that? The only reason their "lines of succession" don't bother you, is that you can't see them - but they're there, filled with minor and adjacent royals.

It's the way the thing works.

You seen to believe in your delirium spasm of hate that the Windsors invented this.

They didn't. They just happen to be the planet's most visible exemplar.

Japan's royal court forced the wife of the younger brother of Crown Prince Naruhito to have another baby, although said younger brother was perfectly happy with his two lovely daughters, because the Crown Princess had "only" given birth to a wretched girl, and didn't look like having a second.

So the younger brother's wife "agreed" and the made sure via in vitro that this time it was a male embryo, and presto! Crown Prince Naruhito's daughter was pushed aside, and his nephew is the heir to the Chrysanthemum Throne.

Because it takes balls to wave to crowds, take photo ops, and jaunt off to other royal weddings and coronations. No mere girl could handle THAT.

So, really, you need to get out more and realise that the Windsors are playing a very old game whose complexities of succession caused civil wars and a great deal of bloodshed.

The Tudors persecuted the remaining branches of the Yorks for another 200 years after Henry VII married Elizabeth of York, Edward IV's daughter, to heal the breach between the two families.

But the Tudors, who knew that the Yorks had the better claim, made sure none were left who could have another go at it.

Bullshit, you say?

by Anonymousreply 73December 10, 2020 8:37 PM

Royal jewelry is fascinating. I used to go to this blog a lot. She gives good history on the pieces.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74December 10, 2020 10:06 PM

And I really loved seeing Marie Antoinette's pieces in the auction a couple years ago. That ginormous pearl!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 75December 10, 2020 10:08 PM

Go away, Meghan @ R56. You are interrupting a serious conversation about Zara Tindell's husband's horse cock and breeding. Either get in the line with the rest of us or get out.

by Anonymousreply 76December 11, 2020 3:52 AM

[quote] Damn, he really needed that nose fixed.

I now can't unsee it.

by Anonymousreply 77December 11, 2020 5:19 AM

[quote] Persons eligible to succeed to the British Throne as of 1 Jan 2011 5753 entries

The Wall Street Journal did a piece on Karin Vogel, the last person on the list.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 78December 11, 2020 5:21 AM

They look like they’re friends and love each other and have hot monkey sex. They make a great couple.

by Anonymousreply 79December 11, 2020 5:26 AM

One always hears that horse people have incredibly developed inner thigh and other muscles related to sexual activity. Makes sense. They keep each other well satisfied and do seem to be kindred spirits. When she had to drop out at Bejing few could understand an athlete's disappointment and console/comfort quite like he could.

by Anonymousreply 80December 11, 2020 5:52 AM

Like her mother, Zara developed an interest in something that had nothing to do with being Royal (horses) so she could devote her energies to it, and had a real passion for it. Kind of like a profession. That was a very healthy thing and it saved her from becoming a petulant asshole with a severe sense of entitlement like her uncles and cousins. Good for her.

by Anonymousreply 81December 11, 2020 5:59 AM

[quote] something that had nothing to do with being Royal (horses)

?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 82December 11, 2020 6:02 AM

Meghan's not pregnant. She never was.

by Anonymousreply 83December 11, 2020 6:09 AM

r82 Zara has a career in the horse world, not something that's part of The Crown.

by Anonymousreply 84December 11, 2020 6:13 AM

You have to be stonking rich to devote you life to equestrian training and the horsey set. No shortage of heiresses and ancestral nobility in that world.

by Anonymousreply 85December 11, 2020 6:25 AM

But it's not an official part of Royal duties. She developed an interest separate from all of that.

by Anonymousreply 86December 11, 2020 6:40 AM

Mike is the classic alpha male and probably fucks like a champ. Probably into some kinky stuff too!

by Anonymousreply 87December 11, 2020 7:56 AM

R83 - Oh, ffs, not THAT again!

by Anonymousreply 88December 11, 2020 8:03 PM

R85 - No, all you need is a rich enough family. I don't doubt Zara has a trust fund, although it's probably much smaller than the Wales boys'. Zara and the hot hubby have lived, likely for free, on Anne's estate at Gatcombe Park, where fine horses, training grounds, and training staff are in good supply.

She probably also got lots of stuff free and did her share of marketing the family connection.

And, as a fellow horsewoman, it's likely HM was generous with assistance.

Zara isn't stonking rich, but she didn't have to be. Her relatives are rich enough.

by Anonymousreply 89December 11, 2020 8:08 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 90December 11, 2020 8:44 PM

R90 The boys will for sure be tall.

Louis looks like a mix of Kate and a young Andrew

by Anonymousreply 91December 11, 2020 8:58 PM

I'm predicting another Cambridge this year or at least the announcement of one.

Kate and William, in public, seem so much more relaxed since the circus left town.

by Anonymousreply 92December 11, 2020 9:11 PM

[quote] Louis looks like a mix of Kate and a young Andrew

I wasn’t responsible for that one.

by Anonymousreply 93December 11, 2020 9:16 PM

Another taxpayer funded baby in the middle of a global economic crisis would...not be a great look.

by Anonymousreply 94December 11, 2020 9:17 PM

Carl Philip and Sofia just announced their 3rd pregnancy today.

Number of kids in royal families tend to differ with this generation... The Catholic Belgian and Luxembourg families have large numbers of children. The Lux’s have 5 children and the Belgian royal couple have 4. The Belgian King’s sister, Princess Astrid, has 5.

The Danish princes also have 4 children each

by Anonymousreply 95December 11, 2020 10:01 PM

[quote]I'm predicting another Cambridge this year or at least the announcement of one.

Insurance policy #4 against the Ginger Idiot. Just in case. They can't be too careful when it comes to the throne.

by Anonymousreply 96December 12, 2020 12:32 AM

Don't be so gullible r88.

by Anonymousreply 97December 12, 2020 9:01 AM

Maybe it's one of those late life "oops" type pregnancies. Whatever the case, mazel tov! Out of all the royal couples, the Tindalls always appear to have the most genuine warmth & love between them.

by Anonymousreply 98December 12, 2020 11:07 AM

Charlotte's in a mood in the pictures at R90; cheer up girl, you could be dressed like Ginger Person like Oskar

That youngest kid is just adorable - they're all a handsome bunch, but he's particularly cute

by Anonymousreply 99December 12, 2020 11:11 AM

R94 - Neither the Tindall nor the Brooksbank babies are taxpayer funded. The mothers are private citizens who do not represent the Queen or the BRF and when they support charities do so strictly in their own names. They do not receive funding from the Sovereign Grant, and those who live in Grace and Favour residences that belong to the Crown Estates pay market rents on them that are returned to the Crown Estates.

The Sussex baby is allegedly also not being funded by UK taxpayer money, unless, contrary to their PR's assertion, they are still being supported by Charles, who gets his money from the Duchy of Cornwall revenues, which practically speaking are "his" but technically two steps backs are generated by the work of residents of the Duchy and land management, and therefore ARE taxpayers' money.

Kate is going to be 39 on 9 January and I very much doubt has the slightest intention of having another baby. She's got the three she wanted, they clearly have to be upping their game as the Queen ages and the monarchy has to be seen to be engaged with the nation, and her pregnancies are difficult.

So I don't know where the taxpayer funded baby suggestion comes in.

by Anonymousreply 100December 12, 2020 12:51 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 101December 12, 2020 1:04 PM

I don't know if I see Kate having another one. She's produced 2 healthy boys and a girl. She was very ill with each one and she's got her body back for a 3rd time. She's also pushing 39. Right now, they need Will and Kate on the "front lines" of Royal Duty. They need to be out and about b/c everyone else is too old to do it. I think there is a 30% chance Kate will get pregnant based on nothing.

by Anonymousreply 102December 12, 2020 1:11 PM

I saw the DM dedicate a huge portion of the front page at R101. It must be slow in Royal news, b/c they have debunked that Prince Andrew was not indeed at the Pizza Express and he does actually sweat while dancing. Shocker! With Covid, the world economy, joblessness - who cares about a legal, willing whore and whether she gave Price Andrew a happy ending. If you are 17 and old enough to recruit other girls and willingly hop aboard the Lolita Express multiple times, you're a whore, darlin'.

by Anonymousreply 103December 12, 2020 1:15 PM

R100 I was talking about the possibility of Kate having #4, not Zara's baby

by Anonymousreply 104December 12, 2020 6:32 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!