Today the New York Times was forced to do a follow-up article on why their critics left Meryl Streep out of the list of the 25 greatest actors. Their readers were incensed that she was omitted and they demanded an explanation from the manager. (Apparently if Datalounge ever closes down for good, you can just go over to the comment section of the New York Times to find kindred souls.)
Here are some interesting items from the new article-
[quote] A.O. SCOTT: I’ve been surprised by the intensity of the Meryl Streep loyalty. I thought people might be upset about Tom Hanks, but we haven’t heard a word about him. The male actor people are most upset that we left off is Leonardo DiCaprio.
[quote] MANOHLA DARGIS: I’m not going to say anything bad about Meryl Streep — we love her! Maybe if we’d had 26 slots, she’d be on it.
Thanks, Manohla, but we can smell the crap in your reply from here.
They did have plans to make the list even worse before those plans were scrapped-
[quote] A.O. SCOTT: One of my first lists had Will Ferrell, and I got a one-word response from Manohla: “No.”
A. O. Scott intended to send a shock message to the readers-
[quote]A. O. SCOTT: Keanu Reeves has been a controversial pick, but he was on the list from the beginning. Then we decided we were going to make a statement by putting him up there on the list [at No. 4].
Scott and Dargis will pay a terrible price for leaving Streep off the original list. Will they be forced to write Streep's name on a blackboard 25,000 times? Or will they instead.....
[quote] DARGIS: People keep yelling at us about how many Oscar nominations Streep has, as if that’s a metric Tony and I ever paid attention to. This is not a list of people who have been nominated for Oscars; this is our list of people we really, really respect and love. But we will be doing a 25,000-word ode to Meryl Streep at the end of the year, just so everyone knows.