Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Do you think the Census will make the Dems have a narrower electoral college path in 2024

Based on this article, New York, California, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Illinois and Rhode Island are all likely to lose house seats (an in effect EC votes) due to declining populations. Texas might gain as many as 3 new EC votes

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 20Last Sunday at 12:01 PM

Florida and Texas are going to gain the most EC votes, so the change will be better for Republicans.

by Anonymousreply 1Last Thursday at 8:04 AM

AZ CO and OR will gain votes, so it's a trade off, especially of the dems finally can get NC

by Anonymousreply 2Last Thursday at 8:06 AM

From my count, it is a swing of 5 electoral votes in favor of red states. If the current electoral map holds, 5 votes wouldn't change the presidential election.

by Anonymousreply 3Last Thursday at 8:06 AM

I don't understand why all these people are moving from blue states to red states. I think we should all make a concerted effort to shout at them more frequently and loudly about the advantages of living in California and New York, and how Texas doesn't have a government that cares enough about them to try to give them everything they want.

by Anonymousreply 4Last Thursday at 8:26 AM

R4 What?! The more educated blue voters who move to red states the better -- AZ, GA and NC are within our electoral grasp.

by Anonymousreply 5Last Thursday at 9:29 AM

Pelosi can & should add about 100 new House seats to her building in Biden's first 100 days but she won't based her her past stupidity.

Dems need to add new seats to change the EC back to their favor.

The Northeast & now California (dem strongholds) have lost too many EC votes in the past 40 years.

The South & West (repub strongholds) will keep getting stronger if they continue to ignore this problem.

by Anonymousreply 6Last Thursday at 10:00 AM

R4 Texas and Florida have no state income tax. That's a huge incentive. Also, a lot of people from the North East move to Florida for the sun

by Anonymousreply 7Last Thursday at 10:12 AM

[quote]Pelosi can & should add about 100 new House seats to her building in Biden's first 100 days but she won't based her her past stupidity.

And how would you suggest she accomplish this? Go back to high school before you post again.

by Anonymousreply 8Last Thursday at 10:17 AM

With the hundreds of thousands of Californians moving to Nevada I would think that Nevada would get more EC.

by Anonymousreply 9Last Thursday at 10:18 AM

Wikipedia says that each congressional districts is made up of an average of 711k people. That means that a state's population would have to swing by over 500k from one census to another before they can lose/gain a seat

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10Last Thursday at 10:24 AM

For the last 20 years, Montana was the state/ CD with the highest average population per House rep. The whole state of 900k had just one rep. They will get a second congressional district starting 2021

by Anonymousreply 11Last Thursday at 10:27 AM

R8 The US Constitution doesn't set the number of House seats in stone.

The 435 number has been frozen for 100 years now.

This article touches on some of the issues...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 12Last Thursday at 10:34 AM

r12 The point is that Nancy barely has a majority to work with, and something like this is just not going to happen.

by Anonymousreply 13Last Thursday at 10:36 AM

R13 The point is a slight majority is still a majority.

Most on the DL insist on abolishing the EC. That idea is "just not going to happen" material.

by Anonymousreply 14Last Thursday at 6:19 PM

No, running Kamala Harris for President will make the Dems have a narrower electoral college path in 2024.

by Anonymousreply 15Last Thursday at 6:23 PM

California's population keeps increasing but we still lose representation? We just can't catch a break.

The Dems need to start acting like Republicans and pass redistricting laws with the majority they have. The Repubes did it. The Dems need to do the same if they want to survive as a party.

by Anonymousreply 16Last Thursday at 6:41 PM

Trump and the Supreme Court have fucked around with the Census and the Census Process to the point that the current Census “count” is completely invalid.

Biden needs to Executive Order a new Census ASAP to capture the true count of Americans and where they are living.

by Anonymousreply 17Last Thursday at 6:46 PM

R17 dont you trust the results of the census?

by Anonymousreply 18Last Saturday at 5:25 AM


by Anonymousreply 19Last Sunday at 12:00 PM

R16 Um this happens to NY every decade. If you grow slower than other states, you can lose seats.

by Anonymousreply 20Last Sunday at 12:01 PM
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Don't you just LOVE clicking on these things on every single site you visit? I know we do! You can thank the EU parliament for making everyone in the world click on these pointless things while changing absolutely nothing. If you are interested you can take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT and we'll set a dreaded cookie to make it go away. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!