What do British guys think about cut dicks?

No, they think "Ooh, I'm in for a treat!"

We think of mutilation

What R2 said. Circumcision only happens due to two reasons here in Norway: health or religion. We do not multilate functioning body parts.

We find them weird and ugly.

Most I know don’t really care here in the U.K.. Cut duck or uncut dick... it’s still a dick.

They LOVE fucking Americans, so obviously it's not a problem.

We also don’t need spits to wank

It’s not a big deal.

Neither do we

Foolish and tragique, like driving on the wrong side of the road.

Generally British people don't care one way or another.

Personally I find it absolutely baffling why American gay men seem so obsessed with whether one is cut or not.

There are tons of cut Brits. I was cut and delivered by the same guy who cut and delivered Prince Charles .Now you know.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

R11 It's only the Muslims and Jews in the US who are required to do it for religious reasons that are vociferously against uncut and go out of their way to promote circumcision. The medical establishment does not support it.

As American generations adapt rapidly to the general culture, they fear their community religious practice will be dropped by future generations. For Jews, the cut was used by racists and the antisemitic as a marker to identify the non Christian in the past. That still produces anxiety, to be marked as an outsider for persecution.

For Americans is for hygienic reasons. As a person who's had lots of uncut dick, I prefer cut. Uncut can be really stinky by the end of the night.

[quote]Uncut can be really stinky by the end of the night.

Hopefully!

Circumcision causes higher percentage of mental illness in those who have mutilated dong, ie Americans, Muslims and Jews. They never stop killing other people.

Any dongs, mutilated or intact, will stink at the end of the day, boomer R16, if you don't wipe it after you piss.

I'm late Gen X r19 and uncut cocks can get really stinky. God knows I've had enough of them to be an expert on this subject. I also prefer the way cut cocks feel in my mouth, as opposed to uncut.

It's abhorrent mutilation with baseless reasoning and needs to be cancelled asap. The practice is slowly declining, but the PR campaign against it needs to be revitalized.

Oh shut up r21. Most cut guys like being cut.

Dong mutilation was probably for hygienic purposes among the Jews and The Muslims in the Middle East where there was little water to clean anything. But in America, I'd say the reasons behind it would be the doctors' greed and the parents' laziness.

Your toes stink, you wash them. Isn't it too extreme to cut them off? And look how mentally unstable American men are. And they compensate their lost foreskin with guns, millions of guns.

[quote]And they compensate their lost foreskin with guns, millions of guns.

Um, no. Cut guys never think about foreskin.

Cut cocks only look good on cute guys, but intact cocks look good on everyone. Fat, old guys with cut cock under gray pubes are the worst. Bleurgh.

The National Health Service stopped routine circumcision in 1948, as a cost-saving measure.

Before then, it was a class marker: working-class uncut, everyone else cut.

It's the dry cock head that surprises. Uncut cocks have juicy heads.

Many British guys will have cut fathers and grandfathers. Circumcision was widely practiced there from the Victorian era on. Abandoning of the procedure began to occur in the UK, Canada and Australia in the 1970s and I think national insurance refused to cover it.

Circumcision is a con.

[quote]Before then, it was a class marker: working-class uncut, everyone else cut.

God people type such bullshit here.

It was only ever a minority practice in the UK. I can assure you: the overwhelming majority of the upper and middle class were intact.

I've been with plenty of Europeans, and none of them ever commented on my cut dick. I guess they just kind of expect it when they fuck an American.

The obsession with 'mutilated'dicks that one or two posters have here is psychotic.

Is Princes William and Harry cut ? What about baby George’s penis ?

R3 has reading comprehension issues. Did the UK annex Norway and no one told me?

A Jewish ex told me that the Royal Family has their own mohel and that all the male members of the RF have cut members.

Yeah right.

They all have the same exact reaction OP

Plus, amazingly, none of them have ever been with a Muslim, despite the large number of Muslims in the UK

Sure they have. I know English Muslim couples.

No sex during Ramadan

I had Muslim fuckbuddy who used to come fuck me after sundown.

Diana put an end to that mutilating bullshit. Willian and Harry are intact like the overwhelming majority of males of their generation (90-95 percent) in the U.K. and across Europe. As a result, Princes George and Louis along with Archie are no doubt intact.

Nothing feels as good than sliding my silky smooth foreskin up and down my shaft and back and forth over my cock head...with no need of lube. Dammit I hate that shit just to whack off. Love sucking on foreskin too. Huge turn on, can do it all night.

William and Harry are cut.

Yeah. Sucking a cut cock is like sucking your thumb. What perv came up with this bullshit idea to mutilate a penis FFS.

It's just cutting off the foreskin. Many men prefer it. Calling it "mutilation" is crazy.

r45, why not just cut off ears then? They're just flaps of skin too.

Altering a person's body without their consent is mutilation.

Oh just shut up r46. It's just a bit of skin.

Dry. They're just dry. And they take a lot of work. It is worth it sometimes though.

R43. William and Harry are intact. There have been numerous reports when they were born that Diana refused to have them cut and wanted them left intact as most of the males of their generation. In addition, a few year ago William was photographed by the paparazzi taking a piss after a soccer game in a grassy area adjacent to the soccer field where he though he was alone. Will’s dick showed his foreskin.

Typical DL rubbish. Somehow the topic gets muddled with obsessions with social class, and derailed by the BRF.

Like many American ideas, notions about the anatomy of the penis, and the functions of the foreskin are incomplete (only a piece of skin), and unscientific. If one wishes to casually dismiss removing healthy, erogenous tissues from an infant's penis, and isn't even open to seeing the merits of the other POV, there's something lacking in his critical thinking skills. Infants aren't capable of giving consent, and the effect is permanent.

To answer your question OP, a resounding No, I'm not intrigued by them in the least. I'm very much put off by the appearance of many circumcised penises, but to be fair, not all of them are ever the same. Some have jagged thick dark scars, where it would appear a wild animal had chewed off the foreskin. Some have a two-tone appearance, and very dried or calloused glans. Some though scarred, are more subtle, and "precision" looking, for lack of a better word.

Others have very little to no visible scarring, and DL's favourite goofball exhibitionist "David" comes to mind: he almost looks as if he was born without a foreskin.

My partner is circ'd, but it isn't botched looking, or a dark scar. I love him regardless. It isn't true that all men love that their parents had this done to them. My partner told me when he had asked his mum about it, he found the whole idea somewhat confusing and psychologically disturbing. He wishes they would have left his penis alone.

[quote]It isn't true that all men love that their parents had this done to them.

Most of us don't even think about it. It's nice to have a cock you don't have to clean the piss droplets and smeg out of.

BTW, you're a psychotic freak who is way too invested in such a trivial issue and should just die.

R51 Is that you AGAIN Trixie? Funny how those being honest, rational, and logical are the "freaks" or somehow psychotic. If I'm right as to your identity, you always somehow find a way to insert something about foreskin as a non sequitur in all sorts of threads.

I don't go around insulting people who have been cut, nor do I toss about ad hominems or casual insults in these threads. It seems to me, that's coming from the other side here. Honestly, I don't think about it much in my life. I don't make immature posts each time a pic of a cut cock is posted, as the pro-circ crowd is keen on doing when they spy a foreskin.

r52 you're obsessed and need help. God, what a weird hill to die on.

I have never known anyone who gives a shit about cut vs. uncut in my life, I only see it here on DL.

It's baffling how the Brits rag on circumcision by Americans yet they never call out the Muslims and Jews who have virtually all their males cut. Of course that would be anti semitic yet they constantly hiss and spit at Americans for doing it. Australia and Canada are in the same range as the US but you never here those Brits rag on them. The British aren't going to get a pass now that Biden is the president either, we aren't going to forget all the nasties you spewed out toward America during our dark time.

R53 Not obsessed whatsover. OP asked, and as a Brit with a strong opinion, I posted. (Whereas R51 has 13 or 14 posts here) Now back to football! As I lust after players, I'm wondering whether they're hairy, what their arses look like, and other things I obsess about, unlike the DL crowd incessantly enquring "cut or uncut". Stop attacking those who happen to disagree with you.

Can someone answer why "hill to die on" is favoured by American posters, in response to an opinion given in a single post? Seems as if the Americans here would rather speak for Brits on MANY threads, rather than hear an honest British opinion.

British men smell like farts and have no right to be picky.

I'm just guessing here, r56, but someone [italic]might[/italic] throw "hill to die on" your way because you don't let go easily, and are somewhat easy to identify. You held forth for several days IIRC in a thread about a gay politician/professor in Massachusetts. And as I said, I usually recognize you within a couple of posts: the uncut gay Jewish British guy who lives in Chicago, right?

Not saying you're right or wrong, just that you seem to want to argue points long past the time other DLers do. Myself, for example. There are two threads out there recently where someone disagreed with me. I could have kept arguing, but it's not that important to me, arguing to the death with someone on Datalounge. Those threads were not hills upon which I wished to die, as the saying goes.

I imagine you'll want to argue some point I've made in this post. That's who you are. Not everyone chooses to do that. Not everyone is here to find that "hill to die on."

From R58, the troll who follows me around the lounge, and needs to REPEATEDLY tell everyone where I live, and what religion I celebrate, I would like to share a bit of his previous comments about foreskin. He has tonnes on smeg as well, but forget that for the moment. He clearly has a phobia, as well as a strong bias. He's lying when he claims otherwise. I chose not to copy posts where he says truly revolting immature tosh.

Dicks of Reddit r143, because of the preponderance of Trumpics, many of us have Link Previews turned off, so we have to click on each pic individually. I'm not the person who complained, but it was a little disappointing to click open 15 foreskins in a row. I ignoredared the poster and found he'd done foreskin fests in previous Reddit dick threads, one after another after another after another after another after another after another. It would be one thing if a face had been included in each pic, but I don't remember that being the case.

I now turn Link Previews on again when I look at a dick thread, so I can, as you put it, just scroll pas..... --End Cunt's Post--

R58 Before you accuse others of suffering psychiatric problems and obsessions, look in the friggin mirror you annoying ugly troll.

It rather isn't my style to do this sort of thing, but you have pulled your tiresome "Ignoredar" trick on so many posters here in the past, you bloody well deserve it. It's quote telling that you are the one with the problem. Some advice, if you cannot even stand the look of a natural cock, stay away from all the nudie and porn threads you love so much. It isn't fair to expect a thread creator to omit or limit what HE finds hot because you suffer "Prepucephobia". Grow up. Stop derailing threads as well you petty little grudge holder. Get rid of your multiple accounts, so I can ultimately block you for good.

TLDR

I think about cute dicks all the time.

[quote] it was a little disappointing to click open 15 foreskins in a row.

Hilarious OCD quote of the day.

R62 Ha! It is sort of hilarious how ridiculous it is....totally OCD, spot on.

If you have to have your foreskin cut off to remind you to wash your penis ... you’re probably doing it wrong

Honestly, it is not that big a deal - I would always prefer an uncut over a cut dick, because I am uncut myself so I know how to handle an uncut one a lot better and they are (to me) just easier to deal with, but I've been with guys with cut dicks and it really doesn't make that much difference.

Sorry, but uncut is gross.

R66 Then go start your own thread on that. OP asked what Brits thought of cut dicks.

Uncut dicks give you yeast infections.

I've never encountered a dirty cock in England, and I have encountered many.

Brits are mostly uncut, but a significant percentage of white Brits, especially those born into privilege, are cut by choice. Also, large communities of British South Asian and other Muslims and Jews means seeing a cut dick isn't unusual for a Brit the way it would be for, say, someone in Scandinavia. It has never been an issue in Britain.

What I find interesting, is it's always circumcised men that make a big deal and discriminate, against the uncircumcised. I've never heard of an uncut man rejecting sex because someone happens to be cut. But the opposite is true, especially in America - there is a significant chunk of men (and women) who refuse to have sex with a partner who is uncut and they are not shy about saying it on TV. They usually don't have a good reason but just "eugh"! I remember Andy Cohen trying to reason with a woman on Love Connection by telling her "it's just a hood" after she eliminated a guy because he's European and likely uncut.

Americans have also spread their circ bigotry to Mexico where it's used as a marker of social class. wealthy and upper-middle-class Mexicans tend to circumcise their sons while the poor don't.

Here's the Guardian's review of Alfonso Cuaron's Y' Tu Mama Tambien that alludes to the cut vs uncut dynamic in Mexico.

[quote]Tenoch (Diego Luna), the son of a wealthy, corrupt politician, and middle-class Julio (Amores Perros's Gael Garcia Bernal) are high-school students in Mexico City. ...The sex in the film is bold, especially for Mexico, but never gratuitous. Nudity is presented as perfectly normal - although it wasn't always easy for the male actors. "It's not that I don't have a problem taking my kit off, it's just that I can't imagine the film without it," says Garcia Bernal, a 23-year-old graduate of London's Central School of Speech and Drama who was born in Guadalajara and now lives in an east London loft.[bold] "My character had to be circumcised, but I am not," offers Luna,[/bold] who at 21 is already a soap opera star in his native country. "With a prosthetic penis, I felt I was dressed: it wasn't my dick."

[quote]a significant percentage of white Brits, especially those born into privilege, are cut by choice.

It's like someone typing from the moon. Er, NO! Total crap.

[Quote] there is a significant chunk of men (and women) who refuse to have sex with a partner who is uncut

Just sucking up to their men, like when they pretend to like team sports.

I like cut dicks, the contrast with my uncut cock is fun, exciting. There's more sensual variation with an uncut cock of course: the foreskin and frenulum are highly sensitive, and the slow retraction can be really erotic.

That said the look and feel of a cut cock have their distinct charms. The last time I had sex pre-lockdown was with a cut guy with a beautiful cock: perfect circumcision so the shaft-skin rested neatly on the head, entire big cock the same colour. Lovely to suck.

[quote]What I find interesting, is it's always circumcised men that make a big deal and discriminate, against the uncircumcised.

Right. They’re the ones always shrieking “MUTILATED!”

It's a hygiene thing, they always say they wash it it but it still stinks and gets cheesy within an hour again. You just can't keep it clean for long. Then there are the ones who never wash properly and expect you to put that thing in your mouth.

Why doesn't anyone ever talk shit about the jews and muslims and most African men who are also cut? No, they constantly call Americans mutilated but never call the others mutilated for fear of being called antisemitic and racist.

^^^Hates Jews and Muslims and wants us to hate them too.

I typically prefer cut. But of late, I will take anything I can get especially if it has an accent.

R78 you're a stupid cunt, that not what I said and you know it.

In all honesty, I’m not a fan. The scarring is often quite unattractive and the head isn’t the most attractive part in the first place. People who say uncut are not hygienic...Jesus, that’s what you should be washing in the first place. I’ve never had any issues or complaints down there. And I don’t need lube to wank which is a plus!

R81, gross.

Washing your dick is as easy as washing any other body part--even easier. It's second nature and doesn't require any effort. It takes all of two seconds...you slide your foreskin back and wash. There is no problem. And not worth even considering cutting off a healthy body part that feels great. Some of you goddamn people don't have a brain in your skull. And your dick is clean. This nonsense about having to wash again in an hour is nothing but bullshit. Just because you're cut doesn't mean your cock smells like fucking roses. And intact men don't need fucking lube just to jack off.

Mexico, like other Latino countries generally don't circumcise. The vast majority of Mexicans like their brothers in Central and South America are intact. That class thing and cutting has fallen by the wayside. Just like in Britain, it used to be a class thing to cut. For a few generations now, most British and UK men are intact regardless of their economic class.

R15 Actually, the US medical establishment does support it, though it has lessened its endorsement over the past few decades (probably due to the vociferous anti-circ brigade) and left the topic as “the benefits outweigh the risks.” It has been shown in several studies to reduce the risk of HIV, STIs, and penile cancer. Let’s be honest, foreskin is nothing but a reservoir of smegma, old piss, viruses and bacteria.

Anti-vaxx, anti-circ, it's all madness! Uncut ("intact" bullshit) guys get so f***ing defensive. Give it a rest already.

OP we don't.

should be washing in the first place.

There you go again! Didn't I say they say it? That is always what they say, there I said it again and again and again

R83 you wish you were cut don't you?

Some foreskins, especially on older guys walking around the locker room, are so flappy they look more like vaginas than penises, and that ain't right.

Americans are so hot and fun. Why oh why did they have to mutilate their penises?

Some studies produce data suggesting penile circumcision lowers cervical cancer rates by over 20%.

Why do people generalize? I've seen beautiful uncut and cut dicks and ugly uncut and cut dicks. Doesn't it depend individually?

Amen, R93. It's a matter of personal taste and preference. If you don't like the way someone looks, walk away, find someone new. It's as easy as that. You don't need to insist that everyone in the world adhere to your tastes. People need to mind their own business and respect other people's choices and/or social customs.

I saw porn long before I had fully developed myself and of course before I saw another naked man in person. All the porn was US porn so it took me a while to figure out what all that skin was about on mine! I live in the US now and don't really care either way. The head is the sexiest part of a dick to me so a cut man with a mushroom head is very sexy. I love looking at it hard and soft. Long foreskins are not visually pleasing to me, especially when flaccid but not a deal breaker or anything.

There's also the 800 lb gorilla question of children's rights. How dare we make body modifications on other people before they can give consent. It is deeply unethical.

@ R 16: There is no better hygienic reason other than to pull the foreskin and wash it well with soap on very shower you take! Hygiene is no a real enough reason to mutilate a baby penis. BTW< Women also form the cheese you are so concern with in their vagina lips. Should their vagina lips be mutilated for hygienic reasons as well? The only and sense able way to have your genitals squeaky clean is by using soap and water daily, not by cutting off a man's foreskin permanently.

@ R 92: So, What are you implying? That men should sacrifice their own genitals by mutilation in order to please and help a woman percentage cervical cancer rate? Men have no duty or obligation to women, much less with their body parts. What an idiotic comment. A lot of women get potentially exposed to cervical cancer due to having multiple sexual partners which have not much to do with a man being circumcised or not, that is more of a fact. Cervical cancer is rather developed by the papilloma virus which a man carrying the infection (likely picked up from another woman's vagina) might not be apparent in the shaft of the penis skin, and that got nothing to do with circumcision, take a virology class for god-sake!

R96, As if babies aren’t subjected to other interventions without consent. Exactly why are newborns given the Hep B vaccine hours after birth? Wouldn’t it be wiser for the mother to have a hepatitis test before birth instead? Did the baby make an informed decision? What about the 20+ vaccines kids get before age 1? Some are necessary, but why chickenpox? Most kids do fine with chickenpox. What about ear piercing that millions of baby girls go through?

Parents get the privilege to make decisions for their minor children.

Will someone respond to this ^ tiresome dullard for me please. Thanks.

The Brits just have to come terms with the fact that despite Brexit, they're still Europeans and that they and Americans are separate and not the same. They have different views on this matter and while Americans don't go to Britain to campaign for them to circumcise their boys, the Brits should mind their business as well. Literally, no opinion is changed by this and American parents aren't eager for their son to grow up and singled out for ridicule in the cutthroat high school environment that is the most formative for Americans and is where most life-long scarrings occur.

R101 it's one loon posting in this thread. Believe me Brits do not have views on American penises. I have never heard anyone bring up the subject and other than this loon posting here there is no movement of Brits trying to tell Americans what to do about this. Don't let internet crazies color your impression of a whole nationality.

As an aside do you guys still have communal showers in high school? Always was both intrigued and horrified when I saw that in movies. We had PE on Wed afternoons and we just wore our tracksuits in in the morning and then went home afterwards. Our school didn't even have a changing room.

R99 A bit of digression, but as you brought it up, when asked which of all vaccinations are the least warranted, and the least effective, a large majority of physicians admit it is the Hep B... They often do not give it to their own children. For two very fundamentally sound scientific facts, as well as some basic common sense.

1. Unless the mother is a prostitute, or has been spending time with multiple unprotected partners, it's highly unlikely she has Hep-B. This jab isn't necessary, as Hep B is a sexually transmitted disease. Infants are not having sex. There's very little evidence any Hep-B jab could help an infant who had already contracted the virus.

2. Newborns lack the immune capabilities to even respond to vaccines.

@R101: Regarding communal showers.., there was a time when most high schools, colleges and private gyms had communal showers and no one gave it a second though until homosexual paranoia began in the late 1980's and into the 1990's; Straight guys felt that gay men were for the most part hitting on them and new whole notion began. As a precaution a lot of communal showers started to be converted into private ones with a door or shower curtain for privacy. This change also took place at all brand new construction facility including YMCA's and military schools around the country.

PS: Also during the 1990's as part of this backlash regarding things "gay" all of the NBA and other sports started to wear long shorts down to the knee as oppose to short shorts men wore for many decades from the 1940's to the 1970's.. If you observe photos from the national teams of the 1970's and 1980's you'll notice that men wore very short shorts and it looked more aesthetically and light as oppose to big, boxy and heavy like men in sports wear nowadays. It's a good thing that the newer young generation is bringing back short shorts again for running and outdoors activities.

It's funny, R7. When I was a young teen, and guy friends made jokes about lotion & masturbation, I was completely naive (though I'd screwed around with friends my age before that).

Neither British nor American here and I am cut. I don’t particularly care that I’ve been “mutilated”. I also don’t get the Datalounge (or maybe it’s an American) obsession with cut v’s uncut.

You guys need to get out more.

I just tell Brits when I'm in the UK that I'm Jewish.

Then suddenly I'm doubly exotic. And best of all, I never have to wonder if they're going to embarrass me by introducing me to their families.

One of the reasons I prefer intact is the head is nice and smooth like the inside of your mouth.

Licking and sucking on the cracked skin of a cut dick is like licking an elbow.

Jews and Arabs in the UK are cut. If you live in London it's not uncommon.

R109, plus there are other British guys who are cut.

Eg. Alex Pettyfer revealed to Chelsea Handler he is circumcised.

It's in this video at about the 20:00 mark:

Surely this belongs to a Datalounger?

Cut cocks rock!

Intact, baby. Foreskin forever.

I think it pretty much comes down to what you’re used to, no?

It was never explained to me why I had a scar on my penis. I wouldn’t say it was traumatic (after I researched it), but if it had been for religious reasons and explained to me, I would have had an easier time of it. Mine was “just because”.

I used to find uncut unusual. But I am really more into the guy and have found uncut to have its own certain benefits. It’s like one is good at baseball and the other one is good at basketball.

I do have a son. I was young and pressured by family into allowing the procedure. So we talked about it when he was 6.