Playgirl returns!

The new editor seems skeevy:

Artsy nudies?

So Brave!

Uhm, who are they trying to appeal to with that? Lol

Oh, so it’s for autogynephiles with pregnancy fetishes:

[quote] There’s also ​Playgirl​’s Heroes​, profiling 10 female activists including ​...Raquel Willis​, Black transgender activist, and Alicia Garza​, activist, writer and Black Lives Matter co-creator.

[quote] As for the photography, there’s work such as “Power. Play.” by Harley Weir, showcasing the 21st century’s paradigm shift....and The New Sexy by Myla Dalbesio, challenging outdated ideas of beauty.

[quote] But unlike the original, which was criticized for the lack of diversity in its pages, the magazine’s approach is “gender- and trans-inclusive, intergenerational and strives to reflect the diverse, dynamic array of women’s experiences.” “I’m really proud of how diverse our body types are in the issue — whether it’s in the centerfold or in fashion,” said Lindley Kuhns.

It has come to my attention that I’m on the cover of Plaguur Moogazane.

Since only gay men read it, rename it Playgurrrl.

So, FTMs, fat Black women and fuggos.

Oh, boy, er, thing.

[quote]the magazine’s approach is “gender- and trans-inclusive...

This will be in both issues published...before folding again... for good.

So... reading between the lines of R5's details, it seems the new magazine will be totally insufferable and unreadable.

I give it 3 months before it folds.

Is “Jennifer” Pritzker funding this little propaganda zine?

What a stupid idea

Alok as the covergirl!

It’ll be out of business in less than a year.

A magazine that appeals to 0.0001% of the population and causes the rest to involuntarily gag sounds like a great business plan!

'Everything and the kitchen sink inclusive' couldn't be less sexy if it tried.

[quote]PLAYGIRL magazine originally published for women but who also had a large gay fanbase

Are there no editors?

Of course not, R17! Correcting what others write is a micro- and macro-aggression, an oppressive symbol of the white straight male Western culture of oppression that asserts that some things are "correct" and others "incorrect".

Really, you should know this by now. Check your privilege!

3 months R14.

It's very transphobic for this magazine to have put a non-Black-Trans-Woman on the cover of the first issue and literal violence to taunt brave, stunning trans women by showing a pregnancy they can't even have until cis women are forced to donate their uteruses to the most oppressed people on Earth.

Really bad idea. Aimed at everyone and abhorred by all.

Why is there a pregnant woman on it??

r22 to trick real women into thinking it's a magazine for real women and to appeal to maiesiophiliacs, most of whom are autogynephilic trans "women", i.e. straight men.

Will it have naked men or not?

But is clearly not aimed at everyone R21.

Doomed to failure. They'll suspend operations within 6 months.

3 months R26.

R25, it clearly states "eroticism has no gender." Sounds like everyone to me.

[quote]Really bad idea.

We love it!

r24, it will have naked men in women's wigs and makeup showing off their "girl dicks" and breast implants

So, now they've decided to even take away a magazine for women that was never even for women just to show those women that real women have dicks. Success is inevitable!!!

I nominate Stephonknee for a centerfold!

Your cut and paste skills suck donkey dick.

[quote]Playgirl is pure eroticism on paper to take home.

Now there is an innovative business plan for the twenty-first century!

R5 the content sounds absolutely unfappable. How dare they the the playgirl legacy and tarnish it in this atrocious way?

This is a joke right?

It's a woke.

Shouldn't this be called Playthem?

Putting a real pregnant woman under the name of the magazine seems like a deliberate provocation to the trans. They really hate seeing anything they can’t have.

Even trannies don't want to fuck other trannies, much less jerk off to them. I guess, some tranny chasers might buy it, but there's not enough of them to sustain a regular print publication and trannies already give that shit away for free, so...

Maybe they can run an article on cute dates and choking.

I hope Chloe sucks cock in her layout like the way she got famous.

We want the penis and nothing but the penis!

I’d love to know who’s advertising in this. If anyone.

r44, Martine Rothblatt and Jennifer Pritzker, et al are multi-billionaires. They could keep this thing running, indefinitely, with zero subscribers or advertisers.

They will probably be forced to R45.

[quote]They could keep this thing running, indefinitely, with zero subscribers or advertisers.

Yet another revolutionary facet to this brilliant business plan.

Is this actually going to have naked MEN in it? And I don’t mean trans men or trannies with shenises.

I predict lots of cuckholding.

[quote]I’d love to know who’s advertising in this.

Pfizer.

If someone wanted to be "inclusive" they'd acknowledge the many gay men that kept the mag afloat and do some man on man pictorials. This is really just WokeGirl.

Fuck this shit,I want to see hot men being sexualized!

Playgirl's one and only purpose was jerk off material for gay boys in the pre-Internet era. It became obsolete by the late 90s.

What's a magazine?

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

R38, they could call it Plaything, and that would just about cover it...

R6 It has come to my attention that a tiny intimate baby 👶🏾 shower for 400 is being planned in my highest honor for my sensationally brave nudie cover. It is being hosted my dearest Cosima Von Bülow, Bülow von Meinhof & North West!

^It will be held in the Far East!

[quote] women and to appeal to maiesiophiliacs, most of whom are autogynephilic trans "women", i.e. straight men.

What?

So wait, is that a non-transitioned transman on the cover? Am I supposed to masturbate to that? I don’t think my Rabbit is coming out of the box for that.

[Quote]Even trannies don't want to fuck other trannies

Dataloungers love to say this despite the fact that it is not true. There is a strong correlation between autogynephilia and gynandromorphophilia, and we have a famous example of this fact: Caitlyn Jenner, who, since making her transition, has only dated other trans women.

I love you r6 !!!!

This is the silliest thing I’ve heard in a long time and we are in 2020 ffs.

[post redacted because independent.co.uk thinks that links to their ridiculous rag are a bad thing. Somebody might want to tell them how the internet works. Or not. We don't really care. They do suck though. Our advice is that you should not click on the link and whatever you do, don't read their truly terrible articles.]

ugh...I meant to post maybe non-binary Nico Tortorella will bare it all

I still don't understand why they must use the name 'Playgirl'? Just to mock its legacy? Their magazine should be called 'woke genderless freak' or something.

No one under 40 reads magazines.

Interesting. So women didn’t buy it before but gay men loved seeing hot naked men so they bought it. Now they took away the hot men. Oh wait I guess nobody will buy it...

Even if they did the old format, who the hell would buy it? There’s so much porn and nudity online for free.

Hasn't Caitlyn only dated one person since her transition R60?

Or are you aware of others?

R60 To be fair, who else would WANT to date Kaitlyn? I can't imagine a "cis" man or woman wanting that.

A sudden, they have switched my Baby Shower 🚿 venue to an abandoned G.M. Factory 🏭 in Detroit. Flying over from Hoorup wil be Baby Jane Mussolini, Teddi Jo Mengale and Mason Disek! There will be absolutely no food but tons of opioids, AK47’s & Don Julio Silver Anniversary Tequila. Sponsored by the Sackler Family, Halliburton and Tall House Cookies.

The first centerfold will be Jeffrey Toobin.

Demi Moore did a better cover, twenty-some-odd years ago.

I look forward to all the FTM nudes.

Said no one ever.

Maybe the new Playgirl should have one famous celebrity each month. And not just a Z-list "Dancing with the Stars" celebrity. Someone well-known from all fields: entertainment, politics (past or present), business, medicine, political activists, environmental activists, sports, media, etc.

These responses have been terrific.

Except for this one:

[quote] I hope Chloe sucks cock in her layout like the way she got famous.

That is not how she “got famous”, you twat.

prominent people wouldn't want to do it r75

[quote]No one under 40 reads magazines.

Try 60.

R68 I hope the Brazilians bring G Magazine back. Celebrity centerfolds showing erections - it’s hard to believe this was a reality some years ago....

"Maybe they can run an article on cute dates and choking."

Could we maybe not other those in the breath-play community by using inflammatory words like "choking"? It literally takes nothing away from you to use "handling" instead. #HandleYourBigotry

R68, I think people would buy if, as in the early days, it featured naked male celebrities, but I can’t imagine that happening nowadays. Men who are willing to be naked for publicity are already doing it in other venues, and actors hoping for a serious career won’t do naked photo spreads. It was a brief novelty in the early/mid-‘70s that can’t be revived in the current climate.

Toll House Cookies 🍪

Didn't they pretty much wind up using gay porn stars as models at the end?

They can likely recruit from the ranks of OnlyFans models.

Special Front Hole Double Issue!

Yeah, it smells like the former Playgirl's 'sad last days' - tattooed bony whores in the creepy skanky Terry Richardson 'style.'

Give me a real man, unshaved, and semi-erect!

Nobody actually jerks off to "brave" trans and gender-benders showing off their bodies, but I suppose some college-age nitwits will buy issues anyway to show how supportive they are.

I doubt it will be enough to keep pay the cost of printing, or badnwidth.

I hope all 5 of their subscribers love it

R85, I agree. Where are guys like that today? It's not like there's no market for models who are masculine without being tatted-out overblown monstrosities and who look, for want of a better word, respectable. In fact, such men do bare all on Reddit, although often without showing their face.

One problem, exemplified by this this idiotic idea, is that too many porn-makers like to pretend their making "erotic art". They want to be transgressive and avant-garde. Meanwhile, 99% of porn consumers just want attractive naked guys attractively photographed or filmed.

Oh, dearing myself.

That's "... like to pretend THEY'RE making ..."

It would have a better chance of making it if they just re-published the old photos of Lyle Waggoner again

[quote]Since only gay men read it, rename it Playgurrrl.

Gurl, I was just thinking that...you beat me to it.

I can't imagine the collection of stupid that got together and thought this was the way to go.

Hope it includes some sexy, meaty shots of post-op vags!

Intact men only.

R93, only 5% of MtFs have “bottom” surgery and, when those few do, it’s frequently just amputation of their balls. It would be impossible to find enough “front hole” models to fill a porn mag published on any kind of regular schedule.

Yes I know r95. Lighten up and take a joke once in a while.