What will the dirt be on Amy Coney Barrett?

She racistly adopted non-white children, depriving them of loving homes of color.

She's a papist.

maybe something on the husband? those jesus loving straights are always freaks

or yeah, could be something on the adoptions. or a housekeeper theyre paying under the table. they must have a shit ton of domestics, with the lady of the house working outside the home, and all those kids

She has an annoying little girl voice. She sounds like Tiler Peck of the NYC Ballet.

Wow, she looks strikingly like Laura Linney.

Cult sex dungeon.

She molested Lorna Luft. I have tapes.

I'm hoping she had a backroom abortion when she was knocked up as a highschool student

She doesn't seem like the type who was too sexual in high school. She was student vice president and in the drama club. So was I. No sex.

That's a photo of Laura Linney you fool

Not sure what will come out but whatever it is the quisling mainstream media will immediately shriek that any mention of it is somehow out of bounds. The general rule of thumb among the political press is that it is appropriate and expected to go over every aspect of a Democrats life with a fine toothed comb but you better not dare do the same with a Republicans.

She looks like the bitchiest bitch that ever bitched. I can’t wait to get the dirt on her. Fuck this bitch.

She's been hand picked by the dominionists so whatever dirt she has was long ago covered up.

R8, drama club president and secretary of Catholic Girls for the Blood of Jesus, you forgot to sign your post

The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Mr Barrett.

She likes blue

You just KNOW she doesn't use Real Butter when she's baking!

She sucked Trump’s little mushroom.

Will the dirt be that she voted in 2016?!?!

She starred in Tails of the Shitty?

She snorted coke years ago with Neely O'Hara in Hollywood. I've got the photos (B&W) to prove it.

She held me down and let her husband rape me!

Nun fetish.

She once told an associate that she was looking forward to sucking cocks in hell for all eternity

She secretly drinks the blood of fetuses to look more like Laura Linney

As mentioned above, she has that little girl voice in an adult woman. That used to be associated with the idea that women's voices don't change after they are first molested. That idea has been challenged, but come on. Who had her? Trump or one of his friends?

Many women have tiny voices. Let’s choose something else to hate her for.

I've become doubtful of that theory. So many American women from 18-45 do that squeaky baby voice thing now. It wasn't always this widespread, I think our culture must be encouraging this infantilism.

R26 ummm these fucking cunts would rather see us in concentration camps or dead... so we’re not cutting Republican DaddyFuckers any slack. We will make fun of them.

Take a chill pill, Phil. I didn’t say not to make fun of her. Don’t um me or I shall reprimand you further.

R1 Just like DL fave Madonna, Angie and Charlize Theron . Crazy white woman love black kids.

[quote]Many women have tiny voices. Let’s choose something else to hate her for. —Bootsy-Gumdrop

Oh, no. Let's not. Let's DEMOLISH her from every possible angle for every possible reason.

Y'all got nothin'. That's why Trump picked her. She isn't even fat.

She runs a pedophile ring from the basement of Comet Pizza.

It's not dirt, but if you need to hate her, she's flat chested and her hair is dried out straw.

She has a spray tan, which I've always thought was a vaguely racist thing for Irish-Americans to do. They do it to "look more professional" and blend-in, i.e. not look so ethnic. Dyeing your entire body a different color to disguise your ethnicity is kinda.. you know.

I hope it's as good as Paul Manafort's extreme cuck fetish, when he forced his brain-damaged wife into gangbangs that he arranged by placing ads for BBC.

She discovered (and eagerly took full advantage of) "the Loophole™" while in high school.

Argh, pasted link in the wrong box.

Attacking her for adoptions will backfire. Really, you want to drag her children into this. Trump was starting to trail among Catholics and suburban white women. So leftist Democrats (not the Biden types) attack a suburban white Catholic mom over her children. Take the catnip, morons.

I have it good authority that she drains her pasta.

Apparently she visited the UK once and pronounced Edinburgh as Eddin-burrow.

No way was this Stepfordess ever involved in any normal human sexual behavior. It would have to be something like prescription drug abuse, an eating disorder, or a financial scandal.

"financial scandal"

You nailed it R42. She is a Repug and an Evangelical. It likely will not take too much digging to find plenty of the above.

I put a pubic hair on her Coke can once and she just kept drinking.

She once wore white shoes after Labor Day.

^^That only works if you're Episcopalian, she's the other Catholic

She deliberately mis-pronouns trans people.

She throws dirty take-out food containers in the recycling bin.

R47 If only.

She probably hides money in tax shelters.

No way in hell does she get along with all of her many, many children.

There is something going on with that many kids. Ego usually, maybe not getting the "right" one who knows. She gives me strong Patsy Ramsy vibes. I mean come on, she used them as props today during her announcement of being selected. They weren't just sitting in the front row, they came out of the White House with Cheeto as a family package.

"She might kill a kid! I sense something is not right there!"

Is this like Q-anon of the left. I think a Democratic senator should make this argument in the hearings.

Get a grip, people!

BTW, all appointees use their children as tv props at the announcement.

I have to give it to Trump and Mitch. This woman is a good pick for GOP base. With her they finally have one single issue to focus on till Nov 3. I doubt any of Dems attacks will land.

[quote]She might kill a kid!

More like she is going to kill Obama Care.

That you can bank on, he views have been publicly stated.

Does she have a willful child? Maybe appointees should leave them home.

^^ Sorry. Any chance to drag that one out. It’s priceless.

R56 Are those the evil twins from that horror film?

She gives me strong Mary Katherine Gallagher vibes, it was bugging me why her smile seemed so familiar and off-putting.

We'll find out that she and her husband are in bed with a Mexican drug cartel and are laundering money for them in the Ozarks. There’s video proof and everything.

I am waiting for a pool boy to appear.

Why do we need actual dirt? Let’s just make shit up like they do. Keep flinging it until something gains traction.

Which stocks does she own? Monsanto?

How is her husband? Kids?

A lot of Haitian orphanages are shady as shit. Just selling the kids of poor parents.

OP, why do you have a photo of Laura Linney?

She will be carrying Brett Kavinaugh's baby.

Poor Laura Linney. She would be horrified.

R66 to take the heat off my Gladys Knight thread.

She did the books for the Epstein-Barr operation. Con Orange was a client.

Next time do a thread on Janet Jackson and post a pic of Madonna OP.

That'll get them going!

People of Praise a religious organization, maybe a cult, in which she is a handmaiden a term they later abandoned will be about all they have on her and her husband.

She, Kavanaugh and John Roberts all served on Dubyas legal team for the Florida recount case. The Supreme Court is their reward

R73 there it is. She already knows how to throw an election.

Beach Week!

UGHH R73, that's even worse than I thought.

She has a Down's Syndrome kid, so now Barron will finally have a friend! (other than the Slovenian hooker mommy)

The next time her husband smacks around I hope he uses lethal force.

"she's flat chested and her hair is dried out straw"

Ah, that's why Trump passed over her for Kavanaugh. He's used to beauty contestants.

I hate her.

George Conway of the Lincoln Project just came out in support of ACB. Told you that you can never trust a republican

R80 join the Coven. When do get together and cast spells?

One of her illegal Central American maids will report that "la Senora's" bed sheets all have 6" embroidered holes in the middle.

Accidents happen all the time.

The DIRT which should be tops in mentions: the danger to the ACA. She is dangerous to the peoples' health. Of course. What Trumpwhore isn't. I'm also currently enjoying the GOP-reminiscent whoppers being put forward! She was cloned.

She is in desperate need of cream rinse!

R69 LOL

I think Amy's 15 seconds of fame are up. Thanks to NYT, there are better headlines this month.

Her adopted Haitian children are indentured servants and must take care of the white children while mom's at work. So clearly the case.

h e l p m e

I saw her get gangbanged at a fraternity party.

She was covered in cum.

[quote]People of Praise

Shine the light on this horrific Catholic organization. That's all you need. In the Middle Ages, People of Praise would have been burned at the stake as heretics.

One video her pretending to speak in tongues, one interview with someone who left. One video of her encouraging subservience to her husband. One example of her just ignoring him.

She makes the Haitian kids sit in the back of the mini-van.

She is in a cult and they want a THEOCRACY.

Every Registered Republican and Patriot of our Democracy should call their senators and demand that she is pulled.

She was actually named after a Sugardale Coney.

That she has terrible taste in shoes.

OH NO NOT THE PEE TAPE!!!!! ANYTHING BUT THAT!!!!! What’s the pee tape?

I've already signed on to play her in a Netflix series on her life.

She's a nerd.

She needs to go into the confirmation hearings wearing a bonnet.

Her black slaves... er “children” should suffocate her in her sleep.

Her idiotic religious beliefs. God I hope someone has video of her speaking in tongues. I don't want to live in a theocracy.

-R9- in my high school, the drama club was the 'hot bed' of sex and highjinks. We had fun behind the scenes!!!!

It is widely rumored that the judge has a stinky pussy.

She’s got Shelly Duggar’s Eyes 👀

Here's an excerpt from the best meme I've seen addressing her. I especially like the line of questioning at her confirmation as a simultaneous indictment of 45:

So how should Democrats approach these hearings? I've seen one good suggestion today. Turn all their time over to Kamala Harris. Focus on the past four years of the Trump administration. This has been the most corrupt administration in American history. No need for hypotheticals. The questions are all right there.

Judge Barrett, would you please explain the emoluments clause in the Constitution. [She does.] Judge Barrett, if a president were to refuse to divest himself of his properties and, in fact, continue to steer millions of dollars of tax payer money to his properties, would this violate the emoluments clause? Then simply go down the list of specific cases in which Trump and his family of grifters have used the presidency to enrich themselves. Ask her repeatedly if this violates the emoluments clause. Include of course using the American ambassador to Britain to try to get the British Open golf tournament at a Trump property. Judge Barrett, does this violate the emoluments clause?

Then turn to the Hatch Act. Judge Barrett, would you please explain the Hatch Act to the American people. [She does.] Judge Barrett, did Kellyanne Conway violate the Hatch Act on these 60 occasions? [List them. Then after Barrett's response, and just fyi, the Office of the Special Council already convicted her, ask Barrett this.] When Kellyanne Conway, one of the president's top advisors openly mocked the Hatch Act after violating it over 60 times, should she have been removed from office? Then turn to all the other violations of the Hatch Act during the Republican Convention. Get Barrett's opinion on those.

Then turn to Congressional Oversight. Judge Barrett, would you please explain to the American people the duties of Congress, according to the Constitution, to oversee the executive branch. [She does so.] Judge Barrett, when the Trump administration refuses time and again [list them] to respond to a subpoena from Congress, is this an obstruction of the constitutional duty of Congress for oversight? Is this an obstruction of justice?

Then turn to Trump's impeachment. Read the transcript of Trump's phone call. Judge Barrett, would you describe this as a "perfect phone call"? Is there anything about this call that troubles you, as a judge, or as an American?

Judge Barrett, would you please define for the American people the technical definition of collusion. [She does.] Then go through all of the contacts between the Trump administration and Russians during the election and get her opinion on whether these amount to collusion. Doesn't matter how she answers. It gets Trump's perfidy back in front of Americans right before the election.

She over-salts her soup.

continued -- who knew you couldn't write long posts anymore??! Quoting from the meme:

Such questions could go on for days. Get her opinion on the evidence for election fraud. Go through all the Trump "laws" that have been thrown out by the courts. Ask her about the separation of children from their parents at the border. And on and on and on through the worst and most corrupt administration in our history. Don't forget to ask her opinion on the evidence presented by the 26 Trump accusers. Judge Barrett, do you think this is enough evidence of sexual assault to bring the perpetrator before a court of law? Do you think a sitting president should be able to postpone such cases until after his term? Judge Barrett, let's listen again, shall we, to Trump's "Access Hollywood" tape. I don't have a question. I just want to hear it again. Or maybe, as a woman, how do you feel listening to this recording? Let's listen to it again, shall we. Take your time.

Taking this approach does a number of things. 1. Even if Barrett bobs and weaves and dodges all of this, it reminds Americans right before the election of just how awful this administration has been.

2. None of these questions are hypothetical. They are all real documented incidents. The vast majority are pretty obvious examples of breaking one law or the other. If Barrett refuses to answer honestly, she demonstrates that she is willing to simply be another Trump toady. Any claims to high moral Christian character are shown to be as empty as the claims made by the 80% of white evangelicals who continue to support Trump.

3. If she answers honestly, as I rather suspect she would, then Americans get to watch Trump and his lawless administration convicted by Trump's own chosen justice.

Any of these outcomes would go much further toward de-legitimizing the entire Republican project than if Democrats go down the typical road of asking hypothetical questions or trying to undermine her character.

Use her supposed good character and keen legal mind against the administration that has nominated her. Let her either convict Trump or embarrass herself by trying to weasel out of convicting Trump. Either way, it'll be great television!

That's really smart thinking, I hope someone is listening

R106 Sorry, "excerpt from a meme?" Do you know what memes are? That was a paragraph from a monograph. Wtf.

Ok R110, from a FACEBOOK! (Boomer alert) post that's being widely shared. Sorry it's not on TT or IG.

For future reference- memes are political cartoons, short jokes, or axioms relating to social taboos or political views.

R92 It is not technically a Roman Catholic institution. It is an ecumenical one which is pan Christian. However most members belong to the underage teenage sex abusing Roman Catholic cult though.

R113 So that would be an ecumenical matter.