Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Why did Billy Squier’s “Rock Me Tonite” music video destroy his career?

In 2020 this would go viral and make him a sensation. In 1984 it literally destroyed his career.

After the video came out, he fell off the charts, his concert ticket sales immediately dried up and he was barely selling half of what he was before, fans ditched him, and critics panned him. The video was criticized for glorifying “gayness” and his fans weren’t having it.

Even his peers ditched him and didn’t wanna be associated with him because of this one video.

It’s insane.

One video should have never ever destroyed his career like that, gay or not.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 130May 21, 2021 11:46 PM

The correct term is “why did his career go straight down the shitter?”

by Anonymousreply 1September 4, 2020 1:18 AM

I just watched the video (never saw it before) and I don’t understand why the fuck that would end someone’s career or what was so shocking about it. Then I read the comments under the video and all I can say is I am so glad I am not a part of Generation X. All of them were bitching about how when they first saw the video as a kid they thought it was so gay.🙄 You can say what you want about millennials, but at least a video like that wouldn’t have them clutching their pearls like Generation X. It was and still is a very homophobic generation.

by Anonymousreply 2September 4, 2020 1:28 AM

Growing up in the '80s was certainly no picnic, R2.

The constant homophobia and AIDSphobia fucked me up for life.

20 years of therapy couldn't undo it.

by Anonymousreply 3September 4, 2020 1:42 AM

1984 asshole Reagan was the president. Think about it.

by Anonymousreply 4September 4, 2020 1:54 AM

R2 Almost all the comments are homophobic to some degree. One person even praises how this ruined his career and they are happy and how in 2020 the queers would celebrate a disgraceful video like this.

Some comments are very mean. Some kind of funny though. Lol.

by Anonymousreply 5September 4, 2020 2:02 AM

R3 I can’t even imagine. Most of the people in the comments under the video you can tell are Generation X because they talk about it in a reminiscing way and their reactions when they saw it when it first came out. Jesus, it’s like they needed smelling salts and were hallucinating just because of the way he danced. People today wouldn’t have blinked an eye. Like I said the younger generation has its issues but you can’t deny most people under 30 don’t give a shit about something as stupid as this. You would swear he was fucking a guy in the video by their reactions.🙄

by Anonymousreply 6September 4, 2020 2:10 AM

I’m Generation X (graduated hs in 85) and we enjoyed the New Romantic scene, which was incredibly androgynous. Billy Squier probably appealed more to young boomers.

by Anonymousreply 7September 4, 2020 2:11 AM

Gen X today is pretty laid back about homosexuality. It's mostly Boomers who still have issues.

I doubt the comments section of a Billy Squire video is representative of Gen X as a whole.

by Anonymousreply 8September 4, 2020 2:13 AM

[quote]You can say what you want about millennials, but at least a video like that wouldn’t have them clutching their pearls like Generation X. It was and still is a very homophobic generation.

Madonna, Prince, Michael Jackson, Boy George, Annie Lennox and George Michael were all part of Gen X's teen and childhood years. Very gay-positive and gender-bending.

by Anonymousreply 9September 4, 2020 2:14 AM

There are many homophobic people in EVERY generation, including Millennials and Gen Z. Gen Z is actually more homophobic than Millennials, which is funny.

by Anonymousreply 10September 4, 2020 2:14 AM

R9 but most of those straight boys viewed the men in that group as straight men being eccentric and being different. Not “gay”. Once you were thought of as “gay” your career was hurt.

by Anonymousreply 11September 4, 2020 2:15 AM

R6 I agree with you to a degree, but the video would very much be mocked and laughed at if it came out today. The only difference is most wouldn’t focus on if he was gay or not, but would mock and make fun of the ridiculous dancing and his outfit.

by Anonymousreply 12September 4, 2020 2:17 AM

You have to admit the video is pretty damn funny. Who's bright idea was it?

by Anonymousreply 13September 4, 2020 2:18 AM

R8 See R3

R11 Exactly!

by Anonymousreply 14September 4, 2020 2:18 AM

He's trying so hard to be sexy. Mission impossible.

by Anonymousreply 15September 4, 2020 2:20 AM

R15 And Mick Jagger didn’t?

by Anonymousreply 16September 4, 2020 2:21 AM

[quote]Once you were thought of as “gay” your career was hurt.

That still happens today. Why do you think Bradley Cooper and Chris Pine are still closeted?

by Anonymousreply 17September 4, 2020 2:22 AM

When those commenters talk about this video (and him) being "gay," I don't think they mean gay as in homosexual, I think in part they just mean "gay" as an all-purpose insult, which was pretty common back then. "That's so gay" = that's so retarded and ridiculous. (I'm not defending that at all.) I doubt they thought he was actually gay.

But the fact is he does look ridiculous. He's a terrible dancer. And anyway nobody dances to hard rock, which is the music he was known for.

by Anonymousreply 18September 4, 2020 2:24 AM

(R16) watch this video and tell me dinosaur Mick Jagger isn't sexy.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19September 4, 2020 2:26 AM

R13 Kenny Ortega choreographed and directed the video.

by Anonymousreply 20September 4, 2020 2:28 AM

I agree with r7. I was a kid in the 80s and Billy Squier was uncool before and after this video. I think he appealed to older people, just like those other icons of lameness, Phil Collins and Billy Joel.

by Anonymousreply 21September 4, 2020 2:28 AM

Billy and Phil’s music was nothing like Billy Squire, who was hard rock.

by Anonymousreply 22September 4, 2020 2:31 AM

I remember seeing this video in the '80s. He was supposed to be a rock and roller. And he's dancing around like a spaz. I thought it was funny then.

by Anonymousreply 23September 4, 2020 2:31 AM

What really sucks is he was at his peak Success and fame when the video came out and tore it all down.

“At the time Signs of Life finally arrived in late July 1984, Squier was at the very peak of his career. Fueled by successful radio hits, bluesy synthpop cut "Rock Me Tonite" and futuristic hard rocker "All Night Long", the album brought him his third consecutive platinum certification. However, Squier's fortunes took a sudden hit with the music video for "Rock Me Tonite", which dominantly featured Squier dancing around in a dark bedroom with a pink tanktop. The image presented didn't conform to standard gender roles or expectations of masculinity at the time and was a perceived challenge to Squier’s image as a guitar-playing rocker. The video began almost immediately attracting increasingly embarrassed and negative responses from critics, fans, fellow musicians and Squier himself alike, who described it as "diabolical". It has been later cited as one of the worst music videos of all time and as an infamous example of the phrase "video killed the radio star". Squier's album and ticket sales took damage; Signs of Life ended up stalling at #11 on the Billboard 200 and he stopped selling out shows. Squier lost his patience: he fired both of his managers and insulted the video's director, Kenny Ortega, for misleading and deceiving him.“

by Anonymousreply 24September 4, 2020 2:45 AM

The choreographer was Richard Simmons.

by Anonymousreply 25September 4, 2020 2:52 AM

Billy was just ahead of his time. Prancercize didn't catch on until the 21st Century.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26September 4, 2020 2:58 AM

I wonder what the people in the youtube comments would have thought of Queen's I Want To Break Free video.

It's no wonder MTV banned that one

by Anonymousreply 27September 4, 2020 3:05 AM

I've never understood why or how that video stuck out as fantastically gay in an era of pop culture that was unselfconsciously gender-bending all over the place, but I can assure you that it did. Gay as in "man goes up in the man," not merely dorky and embarrassing. This argument is odd:

[quote]The image presented didn't conform to standard gender roles or expectations of masculinity at the time

Considering what else was going on in rock and roll. Something about that Squier video, he just took it full retard.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 28September 4, 2020 3:05 AM

That video is what officially destroyed his career, but he had already turned some of his huge fans off with his latest album because they felt it was too “mainstream” and he was selling out. The first two singles from that album weren’t just on rock and metal stations like most of his previous singles, but in mainstream pop and pop rock stations. They were upset he “sold out”. After that he did this video and they completely abandoned him, along with everyone else who didn’t mind his new softer, more synth-rock sound.

by Anonymousreply 29September 4, 2020 3:18 AM

fun vid

it helped his career u dum skunt

by Anonymousreply 30September 4, 2020 3:25 AM

[quote]But the fact is he does look ridiculous.

There weren’t many videos that didn’t look ridiculous in 1984. Funny how nobody says anything about how stupid Prince looked crawling on the floor in the When Doves Cry video, for example.

by Anonymousreply 31September 4, 2020 3:27 AM

When Doves Cry is a fucking great song though.

by Anonymousreply 32September 4, 2020 3:36 AM

[quote] I remember seeing this video in the '80s. He was supposed to be a rock and roller. And he's dancing around like a spaz. I thought it was funny then.

Looks to me that he was trying to imitate Freddie Mercury and David Bowie.

I don't find his dancing to be THAT terrible (considering it was the 80's), but if he was truly supposed to be a rocker, then I can see how it would turn off his real fans.

by Anonymousreply 33September 4, 2020 3:42 AM

he sold millions of records

is sittin on gold

fuk off

by Anonymousreply 34September 4, 2020 4:22 AM

(R34) I seriously doubt that.

by Anonymousreply 35September 4, 2020 4:30 AM

He's from a wealthy family, he owns a big apartment at the San Remo on CPW and a house in the Hamptons.

by Anonymousreply 36September 4, 2020 4:45 AM

Billy, is this what you were going for?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 37September 4, 2020 6:46 AM

I'm sorry, but you can't compare When Doves Cry to... this. Prince crawling on the floor was fucking sexy. Prince owned wearing panties, posing for an album cover naked and crawling on the floor.

Billy was just not a natural at this and it showed. He looked ridiculous, the dancing was terrible (I'm shocked that Kenny Ortega who is talented choreographed this). It wasn't uncommon for a video to be filmed and then discarded and a new video with a new conception being filmed. I'm surprised nobody said to Billy, "Uh, do you really think this is a good idea?"

by Anonymousreply 38September 4, 2020 7:09 AM

It ruined his career because he looked like an ass and dorky as fuck.

by Anonymousreply 39September 4, 2020 7:21 AM

[quote]I'm surprised nobody said to Billy, "Uh, do you really think this is a good idea?"

I'm a millennial. I'm also a Prince fan and there's just something about this Billy Squire video that is extraordinarily fey and much more so than anything Prince ever did. Pink shirt, pink lights, Broadway-ish dancing, the subject of the song, starting out shirtless and naked in bed, more pink mist and doors opening with pink lights ... writhing around on the floor, tearing his shirt off, etc.

I mean, when Prince did a video he could have been wearing pants with his ass cheeks cut out but five seconds later he'd be dry humping a woman, telling a dancer to shake her ass, talking about her masturbating or some other wild stuff. That's why Prince could get away with this. That was where Prince "lived."

This was not Billy's wheelhouse.

I also firmly believe that many people told him this was a horrible idea and he pushed forward with it. Then when it hurt him he denounced it.

by Anonymousreply 40September 4, 2020 7:28 AM

I think the missing piece of this discussion is the fact that Squier had a totally different image and fan base than Prince or the New Romantics or Madonna: prior to the video, Squier was marketed as a kind of stripped-down hard rocker, sort of in the mold of Springsteen, and his core fan base was the classic Wayne-and-Garth (another blast from the past!) pubescent white males.

These guys are the epitome of white male fragility, so not only were NOT down with "gayness" in any of its meanings back then, but as pointed out by r29, this video torpedoed his rocker image and made him toxic for them. These are the same teens who would have maybe claimed to want to fuck Madonna, but never danced to her music in public, and who laughed loudly at Prince in the company of their equally complected friends.

by Anonymousreply 41September 4, 2020 7:47 AM

Isn’t Kenny Ortega the choreographer of Xanadu? That would go a long way to explaining some of this.

by Anonymousreply 42September 4, 2020 8:03 AM

It was really rather pathetic, but if that article pointed out him wearing a pink tank top as an issue, well in the 80s guys were wearing pink. Polo shirts, ties, whatever, it wasn't considered gay or fey, it was actually on trend. I never got this guy's appeal and I REALLY don't see how he would have ever been considered to fall under the genre of "hard rock".

That said, I'm sure he's not starving, and likely having the last laugh as many of his critics are either dead or sleeping on the couch in their mother's living assisted facility studio apartment.

by Anonymousreply 43September 4, 2020 8:27 AM

I'm Gen X...I was 10 in 1984. I don't remember seeing the video when it came out, but I remember Boy George, Michael Jackson, Prince, Madonna, Wham!, Duran Duran, Cyndi Lauper, Eurythmics...that's who I listened to, along with my peers. So fuck off with the "homophobic GenX" nonsense.

Billy Squier would have appealed to a pretty uncool crowd even his prime. Not hard enough for serious rockers, not hip enough for new wave. I think his fatal mistake was that he didn't stay in his lane, and betrayed the image that was expected from him. R41 said it well.

by Anonymousreply 44September 4, 2020 8:58 AM

The damage was done and his career never recovered.

He still works today.

by Anonymousreply 45September 4, 2020 1:03 PM

I agree r44. I was also 10 in 1984 as I said in r21. I remember this video although I don't remember this controversy. Boy George, Prince, and Wham! were really popular then and their songs are still known today. Billy Squier was extremely uncool and like you said not hard enough for serious rockers. There's nothing interesting about him, like there was about Van Halen, so he wasn't going to catch on with MTV viewers as well. I know he had a few songs but they all sucked and weren't fun like other MTV artists at the time.

by Anonymousreply 46September 4, 2020 11:46 PM

He had 3 albums sell millions. He wasn’t that lame, selling albums like that r46

by Anonymousreply 47September 4, 2020 11:49 PM

There are millions of lame people in this country who like lame music.

by Anonymousreply 48September 4, 2020 11:50 PM

At his peak he was selling thousands of concert tickets and selling millions of albums. You can claim he was lame, but he was successful.

by Anonymousreply 49September 4, 2020 11:53 PM

r49, yes indeed. He was lame and successful. He was on MTV a lot, for sure. I just never thought he was cool, and until today, I didn't realize I had an opinion about him that I would end up sharing multiple times in a thread on the internet!

by Anonymousreply 50September 4, 2020 11:56 PM

I have no memory of Billy Squire. Granted I was very young but I followed MTV and pop music pretty much on a daily basis back then. I vividly remember all the other artists listed here but can't remember Billy Squire at all.

by Anonymousreply 51September 5, 2020 12:00 AM

I had never seen the video and watched it hoping for a giggle but found myself shrugging. Maybe it's a generational thing but it didn't seem any cheesier than other eighties music videos. Almost everything from that era looks like crap to me.

by Anonymousreply 52September 5, 2020 12:01 AM

I was a 17-year-old MTV addict when this video was in heavy rotation and I had no awareness of it being "too gay." It was just another video where musicians were trying to be dancers and actors BADLY. Wham...now that was gay.

by Anonymousreply 53September 5, 2020 12:03 AM

Everybody knew George Michael was gay from day one.

by Anonymousreply 54September 5, 2020 12:08 AM

Why did Kenny Ortega think this was a good idea? Especially the pink shirt, the pink lights every time he went into another room, and the pink guitar...

by Anonymousreply 55September 5, 2020 12:09 AM

R54 that is one of the biggest lies told.

by Anonymousreply 56September 5, 2020 12:09 AM

No r56. Everybody knew. I was around back then and I remember.

by Anonymousreply 57September 5, 2020 12:10 AM

R57 no one knew. That’s a lie.

by Anonymousreply 58September 5, 2020 12:17 AM

What is funny is this song is actually fun and has amazing energy.

by Anonymousreply 59September 5, 2020 12:17 AM

r58 you musn't have been around back then. George Michael was perceived as gay by just about everyone. When he was finally outed in the late 90s nobody was particularly surprised.

by Anonymousreply 60September 5, 2020 12:18 AM

R60 again, that is a lie. Most didn’t know and him coming out was shocking to many, especially women.

There were some rumors but it wasn’t “known”.

by Anonymousreply 61September 5, 2020 12:19 AM

Sorry r61 that just isn't true. GM was thought of as gay by many, there were always jokes about it back then.

by Anonymousreply 62September 5, 2020 12:22 AM

George got outed in the most humiliating way possible and it did seem to hurt his popularity in The US. His fanbase was mostly girls and women that wanted to bone him. Even if people sort of knew they just played dumb or were in denial due to the fact The US is much more religious and conservative than The UK. In the UK, people seemed to just brush off that bathroom scandal and he continued to still be popular there.

by Anonymousreply 63September 5, 2020 12:24 AM

Billy was supposed to be a hard rocker so it's very strange to see him writhing around in satin sheets, dancing around in pink pastels and playing with a pink guitar. Imagine if it was Jay-Z or Snoop Dogg doing that. It would look strange or comical.

by Anonymousreply 64September 5, 2020 12:24 AM

The video was too faggy, that's why.

by Anonymousreply 65September 5, 2020 12:25 AM

R64 Cam'ron, Kanye, Young Thug and Tyler changed that now lol. Now rappers today try to look flamboyant as possible.

by Anonymousreply 66September 5, 2020 12:26 AM

Here is a better version. Better video quality

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 67September 5, 2020 12:26 AM

R66 none of them look flamboyant. Cam’ron did the pink thing 17 years ago, and where is he now? Think about it.

by Anonymousreply 68September 5, 2020 12:27 AM

People knew George Michael was gay. No normal person was shocked when he came out.

by Anonymousreply 69September 5, 2020 12:28 AM

You'd be surprised how homophobic religious people will deny the existence of an obviously gay relative. They will rationalize and think "he's just artistic or special" if he looked and acted like George Michael. People really do see what they want to see.

by Anonymousreply 70September 5, 2020 12:31 AM

R69 no. Many didn’t. It was a different time. Homosexuality didn’t come to most people’s minds back then just because someone was a bit effeminate anywhere but major cities where you saw gays. It had to be extreme for them to think “fag” in most places.

Some people in smaller towns didn’t even know being gay was a real thing back then.

by Anonymousreply 71September 5, 2020 12:36 AM

A video speaking about the videos impact on his career. But warning, the guy talks WAY TOO MUCH.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 72September 5, 2020 12:37 AM

[quote]Some people in smaller towns didn’t even know being gay was a real thing back then.'

They sure as shit did. We're talking about the 1980s, not the 1920s.

by Anonymousreply 73September 5, 2020 12:37 AM

I think it's true though. Many small towns with religious populations back then would shelter their kids from any concept of homosexuality and adults wouldn't even entertain the idea of talking about in public. Even if two guys or two girls experimented with each other they would find some way to rationalize it as "not gay". They need it existed but they tried as hard as possible to suppress the idea or even talk of it. In the case of Michael Jackson, Prince, George Michael, Duran Duran and the New Romantic bands, they would just see them as weird or eccentric and you already had KISS, Led Zeppelin, T-Rex and all those groups in the 1970s. George Michael was also English, and Americans already see the English as a bit different per se. Also look at South Korea and Japan, both are still pretty homophobic and socially conservative and they have flamboyant male pop and rock stars with the most effeminate behavior and nobody questions their sexuality.

by Anonymousreply 74September 5, 2020 12:44 AM

How many gays were out and open in the 80s outside of major cities? How many gays were on TV and film?

Hardly any.

Most people didn’t of them.

by Anonymousreply 75September 5, 2020 12:44 AM

People in small towns certainly knew about homosexuality. Just because there were no gay characters on tv or in movies is a ridiculous assumption that they didn't know. Again, were you even around back then?

God, just look at all the anecdotes of DLers who grew up in those times and how they got bullied for being gay.

by Anonymousreply 76September 5, 2020 12:46 AM

R76 yes, but a major star like George Michael was not someone most would think is “gay”.

by Anonymousreply 77September 5, 2020 12:48 AM

His fanbase were long-haired, straight, working class guys who didn't wear pink and didn't like any sexual deviancy. I remember thinking that it was strange that a rocker would dance like that in pink pastels.

by Anonymousreply 78September 5, 2020 12:48 AM

Sorry, that just isn't true. GM as well as Boy George were always thought of as being gay.

by Anonymousreply 79September 5, 2020 12:49 AM

I remember meeting someone who grew up in a small town where he says he never ever met a black person until HS, where he had to travel into a different town for school. Until that day he thought Black people were this alien race that only existed on TV.

True story.

So imagine what he thought when he met a gay person, who are a much smaller population.

by Anonymousreply 80September 5, 2020 12:50 AM

r80 that man was probably retarded.

by Anonymousreply 81September 5, 2020 12:52 AM

R74 Most Asian men are wimpy geeks and cry babies. Being feminine is not a far cry from being wimpy. It's common for straight Chinese men to hold hands with their male buddies.

by Anonymousreply 82September 5, 2020 12:55 AM

R81 no. Believe it or not, back then, in some places, you could go years without ever seeing a black person etc. now you can’t, but then you could.

I think DLers think every part of this Country was always what it is like in 2020 or like NYC, LA, San Francisco etc. no.

Those major cities are the minority, especially back then.

by Anonymousreply 83September 5, 2020 12:55 AM

R80 Makes sense since most of The US is white. Like over 70% white and most black people live in urban areas or throughout the South. So if you grew up in a small rual town in the Midwest, Northeast or Rocky Mountains then you likely will not see any black people. Most TV and films are based around NY or LA, so that's why there is more diversity. That's also why South Park which is set in Colorado made jokes about Chef and Token being the only blacks in town because Colorado then really is mostly white.

by Anonymousreply 84September 5, 2020 12:56 AM

R84 my old boss is from Maine. He moved to NYC after college because he is a gay man and felt he could live the life he wanted to here. He told me he didn’t know any black people until High School, and even then there was like 3 black kids in his entire HS.

by Anonymousreply 85September 5, 2020 1:01 AM

R84 PS that was the mid-late 90s, Btw. Not even the 80s.

by Anonymousreply 86September 5, 2020 1:01 AM

Gurl, it was the hands! If he could just stop swinging those hands around like he was swinging a purse at a masher, everything would be fine now!

by Anonymousreply 87September 5, 2020 1:02 AM

I think the Van Halen comparison is apt. DLR was just like Prince out there with the flirtation of female sexuality. So the pink shirt should have worked for BS.

He couldn’t carry it off and I just filed that as a miss. He never did anything else that caught my attention.

by Anonymousreply 88September 5, 2020 1:02 AM

He had a face for radio.

by Anonymousreply 89September 5, 2020 1:03 AM

I know a white girl from the Midwest and she is a lesbian-leaning bisexual but her parents refused to believe that she was and told her she was "asexual". I am not kidding. She was in a relationship with a girl and everything but her parents just thought it was a phase and she was acting out. She moved to a small college city in NJ where I met her and also she only knew a very few black people in her home state and would say the most tone-deaf and ignorant things about other races. I told her that here in NJ you got to keep that to yourself because people will get confrontational and violent. She learned lol.

by Anonymousreply 90September 5, 2020 1:09 AM

I remember this video, but I had no idea that it was controversial or that it supposedly ended his career at the time. It didn't seem any sillier or more flamboyant than a lot of videos in 1984, honestly.

by Anonymousreply 91September 5, 2020 1:09 AM

R86 South Park did adjust to the times. In recent seasons, they feature more Blacks, Hispanics and Asians in the background and also more urban development which reflects the changing demographics of Colorado. The town also went from being more Republican and conservative to more Democrat and liberal to also reflect that shift.

by Anonymousreply 92September 5, 2020 1:11 AM

R79 Teenagers didn't realize that George Michael or Boy George was gay. They thought of them as eccentric, feminine Brits.

by Anonymousreply 93September 5, 2020 1:17 AM

Agent: “Trust me Billy...it’s not gay. This is the 80’s...it’s edgy and you look great in pink!”

Billy: “I dunno? It seems pretty gay? I’m not gay. I have a pretty strong rock following. This seems dangerous...”

Agent: “If by dangerous you mean crazy sexy, then I agree with you Billy! Girls will love this! Grrrrr! You’re a tiger Billy! Crawl on all fours!”

Billy: “I feel silly. I’m a great guitar player. Can we focus on that? Seriously, I can’t dance for shit!”

Agent: “Less talking and more ripping of T-shirts Billy...you’re going to love this when we get finished....”

by Anonymousreply 94September 5, 2020 1:21 AM

I think people really overestimate how perceptive straight people's gaydar is.

by Anonymousreply 95September 5, 2020 1:24 AM

I thought for a second that was Jerry Lewis.

by Anonymousreply 96September 5, 2020 1:27 AM

He tried getting the video blocked from being released, he knew it was no good without even seeing it. The record label blocked his request and released it anyway. His GF told him “this video is going to ruin your career”. The label and Kenny Ortega told him it wouldn’t. His label even told him the song is already getting tons of radio play and on the charts and that is without the video being released yet, when it’s out he song will go to #1.

Then it was released and the rest is history. He was right all along.

by Anonymousreply 97September 5, 2020 1:30 AM

He was actually in shock after he finally saw the video. He never watched it, and it was released while he was touring. He started hearing about it and finally caught it on MTV one night and was in shock by what he saw and immediately grew furious and fired his managers etc.

by Anonymousreply 98September 5, 2020 1:32 AM

Had this been a female, someone like Paula Abdul, this video most likely would have been a hit.

by Anonymousreply 99September 5, 2020 1:33 AM

R99 of course. Women were expected to act like this, not men. Madonna or Paula etc. crawling on the floor in a dark lit bedroom would be a hit.

Only a few male musicians would get away with this, like Prince.

by Anonymousreply 100September 5, 2020 1:35 AM

Androgyny was *everywhere* on MTV in the mid 80s. I thought Poison were an all-girl band when I saw their first album cover. Even Ozzy Osbourne was wearing sequined blouses with shoulder pads like some Dynasty diva. It was a strange time.

by Anonymousreply 101September 5, 2020 1:43 AM

[quote]Teenagers didn't realize that George Michael or Boy George was gay. They thought of them as eccentric, feminine Brits.

Teenage boys routinely called both of them fags.

by Anonymousreply 102September 5, 2020 1:44 AM

R102 I think because they were pop stars. Most teen boys didn’t listen to them. They were adored by closet gays and girls. Most teen guys called the BSB and NSYNC fags in the 90s too. It’s because of the content they put out, not because they think they’re actually fucking men.

by Anonymousreply 103September 5, 2020 1:46 AM

And let me be specific, it’s the type of pop music they put out. Michael Jackson pop appealed to straight boys. George Michael pop didn’t.

by Anonymousreply 104September 5, 2020 1:47 AM

Ortega supposedly tried to get his name removed from its credits.

[quote] Ortega, for whatever it's worth, rebuts Squier's argument. "If anything, I tried to toughen the image he was projecting," he insisted in Tarnished Gold: The Record Industry Revisited. Adding that he and the video's editor were so unhappy with the results that they tried to have their names removed from the final credits, he pointed the finger of blame back at his client. "Let there be no doubt, 'Rock Me Tonite' was a Billy Squier video in every sense. If it has damaged his career, he has no one to blame but himself."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 105September 5, 2020 1:48 AM

R101 The band members of Poison were younger so they looked better in feminine clothes and make-up. Ozzy may have worn eye make-up but he didn't try to look like Britney Spears dancing in her bedroom. Rockers were expected to be masculine.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 106September 5, 2020 2:05 AM

Isn't this the stroke man stroke man man? I'm his defense, the 80s had that bisex gender gender thing going on. Look at Quiet Riot and all the makeup!

by Anonymousreply 107September 5, 2020 2:14 AM

Oh, it was more than just "eye makeup." This looked like something your granny would wear if she wanted to glam up.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 108September 5, 2020 2:15 AM

George Michael during the Faith era tried hard to butch up his image too. He sold himself as a "straight" sex symbol though he just looked like a gay guy dressing butch. But naive straight girls still crushed on him and bought that act. When you're a celebrity, people will see what they want to see.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 109September 5, 2020 2:17 AM

The hard rock/metal fandom has always been hugely homophobic...especially in the 80's.

Remember when the guy from Skid Row was photographed wearing an "AIDS Kills Fags Dead" T-shirt?

Or when the biggest selling rock band of the decade, Guns n Roses, put out a song that vilified "faggots" for "spreading some fucking disease"?

I went to an Alice Cooper concert in the 80's in Long Beach, and the opening act was a fairly well-known band (especially in the L.A. area) by the name of L.A. Guns. In between songs, the lead singer made a comment to rev up the crowd that was something along the lines of "come on now, I know you're not all a bunch of FAGGOTS out there!!!". And the crowd ROARED. We left right then and there.

by Anonymousreply 110September 5, 2020 2:22 AM

Most people were homophobic in the 80s. And 90s. And 00s.

It wasn’t a specific group.

by Anonymousreply 111September 5, 2020 2:23 AM

Hair metal was the absolute worst. Thank god for Kurt Cobain for killing that genre once and for all and making it irrelevant.

by Anonymousreply 112September 5, 2020 2:32 AM

I liked Guns N Roses (at least their first album) and that's it. They aren't really hair metal though. Warrant also had some decent songs. The rest annoy me. I'm from NJ and can't stand Bon Jovi.

by Anonymousreply 113September 5, 2020 2:34 AM

Guns N Roses were the beginning of the end of hair metal, really. They were sorta glam (especially at the beginning) but in a much more scuzzy way, and soon most metal bands were following their lead. Not to mention the thrash bands like Metallica that never went in for that stuff. By the time Nirvana came along it was all ready to be killed off.

by Anonymousreply 114September 5, 2020 2:42 AM

I hated Metallica. I went to Middle School in the late 90s/early 00s and they are all my best bud Edmund would listen to.

by Anonymousreply 115September 5, 2020 2:44 AM

[quote]Kenny Ortega choreographed and directed the video.

Fucked me over in Xanadu.

by Anonymousreply 116September 5, 2020 2:45 AM

The Final Countdown

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 117September 5, 2020 2:47 AM

Everyone I knew in the 80’s suspected George Michael as gay. This was the Midwest and not cosmopolitan. Boy George as well.

by Anonymousreply 118September 5, 2020 3:18 AM

R118 sure

by Anonymousreply 119September 5, 2020 3:23 AM

To be fair, my friend group wasn’t teenage girls. We may have had different experiences.

by Anonymousreply 120September 5, 2020 3:42 AM

It's all about knowing what your target market or audience likes and dislikes.

Girls like pop music and feminine things so the effeminacy of pop stars like Boy George and George Michael didn't offend them.

Straight, working-class boys like heavy metal, rock music and masculine things so they were repulsed by the Richard Simmons imitating work out video of Billy Squier.

by Anonymousreply 121September 5, 2020 9:54 AM

R31 Rio will never look ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 122September 5, 2020 1:18 PM

R112 Amen. I bypassed all that hair metal shit and just listened to my old Zeppelin until Nirvana came out like a monsoon and reset the music industry.

by Anonymousreply 123September 5, 2020 1:20 PM

Cool update:

In 2002, Squier married Nicole Schoen, a professional German soccer player. They divided their time between a home in Bridgehampton, Long Island and an apartment in The San Remo on Central Park West in Manhattan, New York City. Squier had been, as of 2016, an active volunteer for the Central Park Conservancy for more than 17 years, physically maintaining 20 acres (81,000 m2) of the park, as well as promoting the Conservancy in articles and interviews. He also supported the Group for the East End and its native planting programs on eastern Long Island.[18][19]

by Anonymousreply 124September 5, 2020 1:22 PM

Right there with you r123 NPO

by Anonymousreply 125September 5, 2020 2:04 PM

the video is better if you imagine this is just his fantasy of really wanting to be with a man

by Anonymousreply 126September 5, 2020 2:04 PM

I used to dance like that in my bedroom when I was a gayling.

by Anonymousreply 127September 5, 2020 4:09 PM

You must have gone through a lot of shirts then!

by Anonymousreply 128September 5, 2020 4:13 PM

I like this song a lot more than I thought I would but the video truly is ridiculous

by Anonymousreply 129October 3, 2020 3:00 AM

I actually like the song. Ironically

by Anonymousreply 130May 21, 2021 11:46 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!