I was browsing on a film forum recently and read a post by someone who, after having viewed all of the films in the Criterion Collection's "Dietrich & von Sternberg" set, was surprised by "how limited of an actress" Dietrich was. The von Sternberg films she starred in are the ones I am most familiar with, but I never thought she was any more limited than most actresses of the period—she was dazzling onscreen, and her performances in those films always registered as strong but understated to me. What do you think?
Marlene Dietrich—overrated or underrated actress?
by Anonymous | reply 57 | August 8, 2020 10:07 AM |
She was limited, but....she was a Star. She was magical on screen and on stage. Granted the magic was carefully manufactured and total artifice, but she just really knew how to work it.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | August 2, 2020 7:10 PM |
She was more of a personality than a good actress. And her persona was so camp. Same with Garbo. To me anyway. Never got the allure of either one. Though Garbo was better at expressing real emotions onscreen. Dietrich was all about image, shadows and lighting. Dietrich just posed a lot.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | August 2, 2020 7:10 PM |
I think she's often great fun to watch, especially when things are way over the top. It's her singing I find overrated: she was no Greta Keller.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | August 2, 2020 7:12 PM |
She was a fine comedian, which can be seen in "The Lady Is Willing." She was a fine dramatic actress, which can be seen all the way back in "The Blue Angel," and with a more Hollywood example (capable of being misread in its unevenness), "Shanghai Express."
Blaming an actress because she was fortunate to have brilliant directors and cinematography (von Sternberg was responsible for the "look" that people cite), because she looked amazing, and because she controlled her own presentation despite and after von Sternberg's work with her. "Blonde Venus" and "Morocco" remain enjoyable, whatever their camp value or how it overwhelms the movies (and even "Destry.")
But claiming she was not a good actress is absurd. Being limited is not being bad. Christ, these quarter-a-thread OPs who exist just to stimulate traffic or trolley are shits.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | August 2, 2020 7:25 PM |
Exactly, r6. She knew her limitations and stayed in her own lane.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | August 2, 2020 7:29 PM |
I thought she was great in Witness for the Prosecution and great fun in Touch of Evil.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | August 2, 2020 7:30 PM |
Wayyyyyyyyy overrated as an actress, but the successful product of incredible marketing and image-setting.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | August 2, 2020 7:49 PM |
R4 Thank you for remembering Greta Keller.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | August 2, 2020 7:58 PM |
“Dietrich was all about image, shadows and lighting. Dietrich just posed a lot“
Marlene Dietrich was quoted saying: “The relationship between the make-up man and the film actor is that of accomplices in crime.”
by Anonymous | reply 11 | August 2, 2020 8:04 PM |
"Darling, the legs aren't so beautiful, I just know what to do with them."
by Anonymous | reply 12 | August 2, 2020 10:15 PM |
She's great in JUDGEMENT AT NUREMBERG (61). She said she was playing her mother.
I like her better than Garbo, her ostensible rival in the early 30s.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | August 2, 2020 10:27 PM |
R13. I agree—she certainly deserved a nomination for that—more moving than Tracy and less hammy than Schell. A kind of Hecuba figure.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | August 3, 2020 12:26 AM |
From Marlene Dietrich's ABC (which I used to have a copy of):
*
Greenland ("Should be called Iceland. See ICELAND.")
Iceland ("Should be called Greenland. See GREENLAND.")
by Anonymous | reply 16 | August 3, 2020 1:06 AM |
"She possesses the rarest of civilized virtues, irony."
by Anonymous | reply 17 | August 3, 2020 1:12 AM |
R17 What are you really trying to say Kenneth? Are you jealous that Dietrich wanted your friend, John Osborne, instead of you?
by Anonymous | reply 18 | August 3, 2020 10:11 PM |
I saw her in 1972. Magical. Granted it was all illusion and artifice, but isn't that what old-school Hollywood glamour was? She embodied it. My friend noticed that Ryan and Peter Bogdanovich were being seated so we went over and I got Ryan to sign my program. She didn't sign after the show, instead rushing into the limo accompanied by Ryan and Peter.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | August 4, 2020 3:39 PM |
Fun fact: I would be able to change my last name to Dietrich!
Then I could go abroad to America and whenever someone asked me how to spell my last name, I would just say: "Just like Marlene's!"
by Anonymous | reply 20 | August 4, 2020 3:42 PM |
I'm surprised in her later career, people paid to come and hear her sing.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | August 4, 2020 6:31 PM |
R22 She didn't really sing as much as spoke to music.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | August 4, 2020 6:35 PM |
She saw what the boys in the back room will have.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | August 4, 2020 6:36 PM |
Was she more into women or men?
by Anonymous | reply 25 | August 4, 2020 6:49 PM |
Her work in Judgement At Nuremberg is kind of brilliant actually. It is a nuanced, brave, and well thought out performance that still resonates today. The last scene closeup of her face, devoid of all expression as the phone rings and rings, is haunting and iconic for what it says about the “ good German” of that time. In these Trumpian times, I think of it often.
By that later stage in her career, Dietrich had developed into a very fine actress indeed.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | August 4, 2020 7:05 PM |
She was excellent in Nurmemberg, Witness For the Prosecustion and Hitchcock's Stage Fright.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | August 4, 2020 7:08 PM |
[R13, R15]I posted my thoughts before I read the thread, so yes, I agree lol!
by Anonymous | reply 28 | August 4, 2020 7:10 PM |
Her daughter's book is one of the best biographies I've ever read. It's so rich in detail.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | August 4, 2020 7:13 PM |
I don't get what the big deal is about Garbo. Dietrich was much funnier, especially that ending to Touch of Evil.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | August 4, 2020 7:39 PM |
R29 It really is.
And unlike Mommie Dearest, Maria's book sort of appreciates the whole person.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | August 4, 2020 7:43 PM |
She vas a wamp and a hawidan.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | August 4, 2020 8:57 PM |
Wanna kiss me, ducky?
by Anonymous | reply 36 | August 4, 2020 9:17 PM |
I like her but she was no Garbo.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | August 4, 2020 9:22 PM |
I can't think of anyone who was, r37.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | August 4, 2020 9:25 PM |
R31 We shouldn't compare Garbo and Dietrich. Both had a decade at the top and then Garbo discreetly retired.
Dietrich changed her career, did 'comedy' roles and semi-ghoulish cabaret appearances. She went on and on and on and lost her dignity in her last two decades.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | August 4, 2020 9:35 PM |
Dietrich kept working because she needed the money. She supported her whole family. Garbo invested well during her Hollywood years and became quite wealthy, and also didn't have any family or husbands to support so she didn't need to work.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | August 4, 2020 9:53 PM |
Mmmmm, I'm not sure anyone really considered her an actress, per se... I mean, "acting" isn't what comes to mind when you think of her.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | August 7, 2020 1:33 AM |
How about...a presence?
by Anonymous | reply 43 | August 7, 2020 1:44 AM |
Certainly. And she wore clothes amazingly well.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | August 7, 2020 1:50 AM |
I love it when her daughter Maria Riva talks about her.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | August 7, 2020 2:00 AM |
THe von Sternberg movies were early in her career and were fetishistic art movies. She did what was required, fantastically. You can't judge her range based on those movies. Sheesh, I'm really surprised this must be explained to you.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | August 7, 2020 2:21 AM |
And anyway, she is quite good in Devil is a Woman and Blonde Venus. There is range within those movies.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | August 7, 2020 2:38 AM |
She always plays a woman who can't pronounce her "R"s.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | August 7, 2020 2:40 AM |
^ At least she wasn't cwoss-eyed like Norma Sheawer.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | August 7, 2020 2:54 AM |
^ Both equally as noseless.
As noseless as Jane Wyman.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | August 7, 2020 3:16 AM |
Von Sternberg embalmed her in glamour - there is an actress underneath. When she is asked to stretch - for example her disguised scene in "Witness for the Prosecution", she is brilliant.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | August 7, 2020 3:28 AM |
Funny story: lesbian I knew saw Dietrich's one-woman show on Broadway at the Lunt-Fontanne and waited at the stage door. She caught Dietrich's eye and Marlene gave her her card with her private number on it. Kitty, the lesbian, called Marlene the next morning waking her up. Dietrich had no recollection who this fan was and hung up on her.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | August 8, 2020 4:39 AM |
Was she more into women?
by Anonymous | reply 56 | August 8, 2020 9:45 AM |
Dietrich wasn't so much an actress as an indomitable presence. When she was on screen, there was nothing else of interest. Even as consummate an actor as Charles Laughton was a dim bulb beside her megawatt aura.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | August 8, 2020 10:07 AM |