Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Patty Hearst lookalike and husband point guns at protestors in St. Louis

She really does look like Patricia Hearst.

They're calling them Dockers Dan and Pistol Patty on Twitter.

Oh, did I mention they're both lawyers?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 85a day ago

To be clear, the protestors were on their street and some of them were on their lawn.

by Anonymousreply 1Last Sunday at 8:07 PM

The protesters were on the couple's property, so the couple had every right to do what they did.

by Anonymousreply 2Last Sunday at 8:08 PM

Look at the cankles on her

by Anonymousreply 3Last Sunday at 8:08 PM

So I guess they were standing their ground.

by Anonymousreply 4Last Sunday at 8:14 PM

GET OWFF MAH LAND!

by Anonymousreply 5Last Sunday at 8:16 PM

Is that some sort of a mausoleum they live in?

by Anonymousreply 6Last Sunday at 8:25 PM

Uh, she has her finger on the trigger. They most certainly do *not* have every right to do what they're doing. "Criminal brandishing" is one term for it.

"Missouri State Law Carrying State law does not prohibit the open carrying of firearms, but does prohibit exhibiting “any weapon readily capable of lethal use” in an angry or threatening manner in the presence of one or more persons. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 571.030.1(4)."

by Anonymousreply 7Last Sunday at 8:28 PM

This tells you everything you need to know about them and their house.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 8Last Sunday at 8:31 PM

These "protesters" went through a gate that was clearly marked private property.

I applaud them for letting these "peaceful protesters" know what was up.

Missouri is an open carry state and also has the Castle Doctrine.

After seeing this, I am definitely buying the pump action shotgun I want.

by Anonymousreply 9Last Sunday at 8:42 PM

They'd also been drinking (their drinks are still visible in one of the pictures). And neither of them has any clue how to handle a gun.

Don't know why these people wouldn't support the Defund the Police movement since they clearly think vigilante justice is perfectly fine.

by Anonymousreply 10Last Sunday at 9:17 PM

"Brandishing is unlawful use of a weapon and a Class D felony in the state of Missouri."

And yet you know the protesters would get a harsher sentence for trespassing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11Last Sunday at 9:25 PM

Nice trigger discipline assholes. You know he's hoisting his gunt up now and rutting on her after their exciting adventure.

by Anonymousreply 12Last Sunday at 9:26 PM

The resemblance to Patty Hearst really emphasizes the feeling that they're from a John Waters movie.

by Anonymousreply 13Last Sunday at 10:14 PM

Is Dockers Dan holding an AK 47?

by Anonymousreply 14Last Sunday at 10:41 PM

Are they Jews? If so the crowd was in no danger. Outside of Israel, Jews are not good at handling weapons. Jews or not, they appear to be (1) drunk and (2) parvenus. Next.

by Anonymousreply 15Last Sunday at 10:52 PM

The CUNT in Cuntess Chocula's name is accurate. She should add Stupid before the word Cunt.

by Anonymousreply 16Last Sunday at 10:59 PM

Wow, his dick is THAT small, huh?

by Anonymousreply 17Last Sunday at 11:00 PM

What type of gun is that? Good, lord.

by Anonymousreply 18Last Sunday at 11:01 PM

[quote] did I mention they're both lawyers

They know their rights.

by Anonymousreply 19Last Sunday at 11:08 PM

If you read the Missouri statutes, you see that a subsequent section states that brandishing does not apply when someone is defending their own property, thank goodness.

by Anonymousreply 20Last Sunday at 11:22 PM

I'm really surprised the old broad didn't shoot somebody. Or her fat foot.

by Anonymousreply 21Last Sunday at 11:23 PM

She's pointing the pistol at hubby's head. Some people should have security guards rather than trying to do it themselves. Pathetic creatures.

by Anonymousreply 22Last Sunday at 11:46 PM

[quote] She's pointing the pistol at hubby's head. Some people should have security guards rather than trying to do it themselves.

Maybe they hadn’t planned for rioters showing up on their doorstep that day.

by Anonymousreply 23Last Sunday at 11:50 PM

R23 Yes they planned, poorly, and are armed. They are more of a danger to themselves and each other than to anyone else.

by Anonymousreply 24Last Sunday at 11:58 PM

Not my taste for decor but it’s a beautiful house they spent 30 years restoring.

The protestors were on private property. End of story. There was no reason to pass the gate on this house. They were in the wrong and it’s only going to scare people away from supporting them.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25Last Monday at 12:43 AM

I don't know who is the more deranged in this story.

by Anonymousreply 26Last Monday at 12:49 AM

So protesters were on private property and had no right to be there - but the optics of these two, probably half in the bag, stumbling around & waving their guns is a mixture of comical & pathetic. It figures that they are lawyers (i.e. gold star assholes)

by Anonymousreply 27Last Monday at 1:18 AM

Finally, the role that will earn Mink Stole her well deserved Academy Award!

by Anonymousreply 28Last Monday at 7:41 AM

r23, I think if you own guns you should take the time to learn how to use them safely. I know this would disqualify 99% of gun owners....

by Anonymousreply 29Last Monday at 8:18 AM

Lovely house. That area is expensive but surprisingly not ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 30Last Monday at 8:21 AM

She has nasty looking banana legs.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 31Last Monday at 8:26 AM

I just can't get over the barefoot aspect. You're that concerned, but you don't put on something that will help you move faster? K.

by Anonymousreply 32Last Monday at 8:31 AM

I read on Twitter they are Democrats and that they are representing someone in a police brutality case. Is this true? If so, why are protesters outside their house???

by Anonymousreply 33Last Monday at 8:34 AM

Pistol Patty as a young lass.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 34Last Monday at 8:35 AM

[quote] I read on Twitter they are Democrats and that they are representing someone in a police brutality case. Is this true? If so, why are protesters outside their house???

Apparently they have donated to Trump, as well.

They live in a community with a gated entrance, and protestors broke open the gate to get to the mayor's home (on the same street or next street over).

by Anonymousreply 35Last Monday at 8:36 AM

That frau looks like she's brandishing a glue gun and about to glue some pinecones to a Christmas wreath.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 36Last Monday at 8:38 AM

They were drunk.

by Anonymousreply 37Last Monday at 8:40 AM

Seriously - anyone would be upset if a bunch of protestors feel they can come on to your property and won't leave.

The same shit would happen in a black neighborhood if a bunch of people came on to your lawn and would not leave.

This is not an issue.

by Anonymousreply 38Last Monday at 8:43 AM

[quote] I read on Twitter they are Democrats and that they are representing someone in a police brutality case. Is this true? If so, why are protesters outside their house???

An angry mob isn’t expected to be rational.

by Anonymousreply 39Last Monday at 8:48 AM

My first reaction wouldn't be to point AK-47 at anyone. But, keep trying, R38.

by Anonymousreply 40Last Monday at 8:50 AM

[quote] My first reaction wouldn't be to point AK-47 at anyone.

We don’t know yet if he had a selection of firearms to choose from to protect his wife and home, do we?

by Anonymousreply 41Last Monday at 8:54 AM

You can tell she has never shot or held a gun before by the way she is handling it. The man does not have an AK-47. He is holding an AR-15 semi-auto. They can be retrofitted into automatic, but that makes them illegal unless you have a license for it.

by Anonymousreply 42Last Monday at 9:00 AM

Unless you’re very well trained, it’s actually worse to have firearms lying around to protect you. Often the intruders end up using the owners’ weapons against them. Get a security guard you dumb fucks!

by Anonymousreply 43Last Monday at 9:01 AM

[quote]You know he's hoisting his gunt up now and rutting on her after their exciting adventure.

I doubt they have had sex with each other in this millennium. What is the name of his mistress, I wonder.

by Anonymousreply 44Last Monday at 9:05 AM

[quote] What is the name of his mistress, I wonder.

Helen Keller?

by Anonymousreply 45Last Monday at 9:08 AM

R40 - do you know what they did first? No, you do not.

You're assuming they just ran out there with guns right away. There must have been some discussion prior to this.

And, like I said, guns would be drawn in a lot of neighborhoods in the US - even black neighborhoods.

by Anonymousreply 46Last Monday at 9:12 AM

[quote]What is the name of his mistress, I wonder.

Brayden. Or Caden, or Caiden.

by Anonymousreply 47Last Monday at 9:21 AM

She dresses like Walmart white trash when she's in the privacy of her own home.

by Anonymousreply 48Last Monday at 9:29 AM

Why are there 3 threads on this?

by Anonymousreply 49Last Monday at 9:33 AM

They’re Dumpsters, per FEC political donations database, with thousands $ donated to Dump over the last few years.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 50Last Monday at 9:33 AM

white privileged jackasses

by Anonymousreply 51Last Monday at 9:35 AM

The “castle doctrine” applies only when a person is on their own property and in imminent physical danger. Someone trampling on your lawn to go protest in front of someone else’s home is not demonstrating life-threatening behavior.

by Anonymousreply 52Last Monday at 9:44 AM

[quote] The “castle doctrine” applies only when a person is on their own property and in imminent physical danger. Someone trampling on your lawn to go protest in front of someone else’s home is not demonstrating life-threatening behavior.

Not according to Missouri law.

They weren’t just “trampling” on the lawn either. Watch the video. They were already trespassing on a private street. From there they opened the pedestrian gate to this specific house. If they were trying to get to the mayor’s house there was no reason to go through this property.

by Anonymousreply 53Last Monday at 10:27 AM

Too bad they didn’t have two daughters to add to the group, they could’ve done a Charlie’s Angels pose! Dockers Dan could play Bosley.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 54Last Monday at 10:30 AM

Did they pick this specific house to demonstrate at? Or were they just passing by?

by Anonymousreply 55Last Monday at 10:32 AM

[quote]Why are there 3 threads on this?

Because it's apparently absolutely beyond the capabilities of anyone who posts here for any reason at any time to check for another thread.

And the new and fun trend is that tomorrow, two days after this happened and all these threads were posted, two MORE threads will be started by fuckwits that think nobody's heard about this yet.

by Anonymousreply 56Last Monday at 2:07 PM

The frauness of it all

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 57Last Monday at 2:16 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 58Last Monday at 2:17 PM

r56 who elected your ass judge and jury of Datalounge? Fuck off.

by Anonymousreply 59Last Monday at 3:12 PM

R59, no, YOU fuck off. Stop being a dumb ass.

by Anonymousreply 60Last Monday at 3:14 PM

r60 you're not the president of Datalounge. People can start as many threads as they want.

by Anonymousreply 61Last Monday at 3:17 PM

Jesus, the stupid protesters stormed into a gated community and you WOULDN'T defend yourselves or protect your property??? Anyone, facing down an angry mob looking for blood better weaponize!!! I don't blame them and this is why we live in the greatest country in the world. He can legally own that weapon and legally shoot anyone who is charging onto his property toward him and his wife!!!

by Anonymousreply 62Last Monday at 3:21 PM

Good for them for not putting up with this shit.

by Anonymousreply 63Last Monday at 3:43 PM

R62, a convert to MAGAtism, finally. There is more joy in the kingdom of Trump...

by Anonymousreply 64Last Monday at 3:44 PM

They spent countless amounts of money restoring that mansion to its turn of the century glory . Goddamn right Id be standing on my terrace threatening to shoot those pack of idiots too . Here in Fl they'd be stacked up like cordwood ,we are all about the castle doctrine . If they would have ben some weak elderly couple,you bet your ass that house would have been looted.

by Anonymousreply 65Last Monday at 3:54 PM

[quote] If they would have ben some weak elderly couple,you bet your ass that house would have been looted.

MAGA!!!

by Anonymousreply 66Last Monday at 3:58 PM

R65's idea of glory: Trump Tower in all its awful tackiness. But deplorables are not known to be tasteful friends™

by Anonymousreply 67Last Monday at 4:00 PM

Would it have been ok if the trespassers had been dressed as lawn jockeys?

by Anonymousreply 68Last Monday at 4:04 PM

Cathy Moriarty is looking rough

by Anonymousreply 69Last Monday at 4:04 PM

She didn't wear a beret - GUILTY!!

by Anonymousreply 70Last Monday at 4:06 PM

It'a fun watching the MAGAts on these types of threads get squashed. I feel like I discovered a new fetish.

by Anonymousreply 71Last Monday at 4:08 PM

The guy is hot! 100% pure muscle!

by Anonymousreply 72Last Monday at 4:08 PM

R53, The actual Missouri statute at issue is, predictably, near-gibberish, but if you follow the interacting subsections, it’s clear that, while there is a presumption that a gun toting homeowner is merely using “protective force,” the state can overcome that presumption and show that your behavior in murdering someone over grass was unreasonable and that you were not actually in danger.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 73Last Monday at 4:24 PM

The actual Missouri statute R73?

I think another sidecar is in order.

by Anonymousreply 74Last Monday at 6:26 PM

By presenting their firearms, the two of them were able to fend off the violent mob that had broken into their property and had stated they intended to kill the couple. The couple had called the police, who didn’t show up, and it was only their bravery and weapons that saved their lives.

by Anonymousreply 75Last Monday at 7:57 PM

The article at R25 says that the house was originally built for Edward and Anna Busch Faust. It's probably at 1 Portland Place. If you look on Google street view, there's a wall along Kingshighway Blvd. and the entrance to the street is fenced in but not much of an obstacle to determined protesters.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 76Last Monday at 10:42 PM

The blonde tub looks nothing like Patty Hearst. Now, her tub, shorty husband looks like Nathan Lane.

by Anonymousreply 77Last Monday at 10:47 PM

You in danger of being replaced by a younger model, gurl.

by Anonymousreply 78Last Tuesday at 1:13 AM

When did Betty Broderick get out of jail?

by Anonymousreply 79Last Tuesday at 1:24 AM

Typical lawyers.

by Anonymousreply 80Last Tuesday at 10:22 AM

Our Pistol Packin' Mama has made the Washington Post as the epitome of a Karen.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 81Last Tuesday at 11:18 AM

Ken and Karen: where are they now?

by Anonymousreply 82Last Tuesday at 2:08 PM

[quote] I read on Twitter they are Democrats and that they are representing someone in a police brutality case.

They're trump supporters. They'd represent hitler and Pol Pot if there was a buck in it for them

by Anonymousreply 83Last Tuesday at 2:16 PM

[quote] They'd represent hitler and Pol Pot if there was a buck in it for them

They would be treated like Hitler and Pol Pot if they used weapons to try defend their lives and home from a violent mob.

by Anonymousreply 84Yesterday at 9:57 AM

An Elkhart, Indiana lawyer with the same last name as this Missouri couple, is getting all sorts of hate emails and phone calls over this.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 85a day ago
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Don't you just LOVE clicking on these things on every single site you visit? I know we do! You can thank the EU parliament for making everyone in the world click on these pointless things while changing absolutely nothing. If you are interested you can take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT and we'll set a dreaded cookie to make it go away. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!