Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Twitter employees 'very unhappy' the platform won't correct Trump falsehoods about Joe Scarborough

Twitter employees are outraged by the company’s refusal to stop President Trump from using the platform to promote a conspiracy theory involving a former staffer of Trump critic and media personality Joe Scarborough, according to tech journalist Kara Swisher.

Swisher reported Tuesday that the widower of Lori Klausutis, who died suddenly in 2001 while working as a staff member in Scarborough’s congressional office in Florida, wrote Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey a heartfelt letter last week asking him to stop Trump from continuing to spread conspiracy theories about his wife’s death via the social media platform. Dorsey has so far refused to remove Trump’s tweets about Klausutis, a decision that Swisher said has angered many of the company’s employees.

“You might wonder why I get so much good information from inside Twitter,” Swisher said in an interview with the Yahoo News podcast “Skullduggery.” “They’re very unhappy.”

Swisher was co-executive editor of the Wall Street Journal’s All Things Digital website for years and went on to co-found the website Recode. Now an opinion columnist at the New York Times, she is widely regarded as one of the best-sourced journalists covering the technology industry.

In his letter to Dorsey, Timothy Klausutis alleged that the president violated Twitter’s terms of service when he used the platform to suggest that Scarborough had an affair with his wife and then murdered her. Authorities long ago concluded that Lori Klausutis, 28, suffered from a heart condition that caused her to fall at work, hit her head on her desk and die unexpectedly.

“An ordinary user like me would be banished from the platform for such a tweet, but I am only asking that these tweets be removed,” Klausutis wrote in his letter, which was first reported by Swisher in the New York Times Tuesday. “I’m asking you to intervene in this instance because the president of the United States has taken something that does not belong to him — the memory of my dead wife — and perverted it for perceived political gain.”

Swisher told “Skullduggery” that Dorsey does not want to remove Trump’s conspiracy-promoting tweets because he believes that they are newsworthy. But she said the problem with that stance is that it fails to consider the impact on Lori Klausutis’s widower. Swisher said that while she does not always enjoy the personal attacks she receives as a public figure and author, it comes with the territory — which is not true for Klausutis.

“If they want to act like a public square, let’s have a public discussion about this where we can have measured discussion and not a tweetstorm where everybody’s sending idiotic GIFs to each other and sort of topping each other and calling you a bitch or whatever the heck they want to do, I forget what I’ve been called today,” Swisher said. “Joe Scarborough’s going to be OK. ... He knows the price of this kind of thing. Donald Trump knows the price of this kind of thing. This widower is not these people.” A Twitter spokesman said that while the company is “deeply sorry” the president’s tweets have caused Klausutis pain, the company will not remove them. The statement noted that the company is “working to expand existing product features and policies so we can more effectively address things like this going forward, and we hope to have those changes in place shortly.”

Swisher called the statement a “typical Twitter response, which is a nonresponse.”

Swisher said her reporting suggests Twitter is leaning toward implementing a system in which false content is labeled and supplemented with articles offering factual counterpoints.

“It’s interesting, but it’s really onerous to do, it’s not scalable — they can only do it sometimes — and almost every tweet of his [Trump’s] is going to have a little asterisk next to it,” she said.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 24May 27, 2020 3:32 PM

On Tuesday, Twitter added a fact-checking label to two of the president’s tweets that made unsubstantiated claims of voting fraud. A Twitter spokesperson said the company has “drawn lines for certain issue areas, including civic integrity and voting,” but added that the tweets about Klausutis did not violate existing policies.

In response to the new labels, Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale released a statement Tuesday evening.

“We always knew that Silicon Valley would pull out all the stops to obstruct and interfere with President Trump getting his message through to voters. Partnering with the biased fake news media ‘fact checkers’ is only a smoke screen Twitter is using to try to lend their obvious political tactics some false credibility,” Parscale said in his statement. “There are many reasons the Trump campaign pulled all our advertising from Twitter months ago, and their clear political bias is one of them.“

Trump then took to the platform to express his displeasure with the company’s decision to label his tweets.

Swisher said it is difficult for Twitter to rein Trump in because it has let him tweet falsehoods without consequence for years. But she said the president is now libeling Lori Klausutis by falsely accusing her of having an affair with Scarborough. She said Twitter often points to First Amendment concerns when refusing to censor tweets, but noted that the company removes posts all the time. She said a different standard applies to Trump only because Twitter’s leadership had decided that “everything that comes out of his mouth, even the bile, is newsworthy.”

Calling Trump “the most epic internet troll of all time,” Swisher said that Twitter’s business is not improved by Trump’s tweetstorms and, in fact, may ultimately be harmed by the president’s affinity for the platform.

“They’re being surpassed by TikTok, by Snapchat, by Facebook, and they had so much potential here,” she said.

Swisher said she doubts that Twitter engineers truly understand the First Amendment or what it is like to feel unsafe. The employees of social media companies are 70 to 90 percent white men, she said, and most of them simply don’t understand what it’s like to be bullied, stalked or marginalized. Worse, she said, the culture in Silicon Valley is surprisingly “go along to get along.” Swisher said she believes Dorsey is thoughtful, but has created a culture that shields him from dissent within the ranks.

“He needs more people disagreeing with him,” Swisher said. “They just reinforce each other.”

by Anonymousreply 1May 27, 2020 11:31 AM

Such bullshit.

There's one reason they let trump keep doing it: MONEY.

He brings in users and followers, and that's all Twitter fucking cares about.

by Anonymousreply 2May 27, 2020 11:32 AM

The love of money is the root of all evil.

by Anonymousreply 3May 27, 2020 11:39 AM

Trump should be banned from Twitter. Jack Dorsey is just another Trump ass kisser.

by Anonymousreply 4May 27, 2020 11:45 AM

Then they can fucking quit, and do what they and their entire company culture is best at: [italic][bold]CANCEL[/italic]/bold]Trump!

by Anonymousreply 5May 27, 2020 11:50 AM

So if I'm NOT a TwitterTard, then I have no clue what the shitstorm is all about, correct?

Ignorance is bliss.

by Anonymousreply 6May 27, 2020 11:59 AM

[quote] So if I'm NOT a TwitterTard, then I have no clue what the shitstorm is all about, correct?

You haven't heard about the Scarborough controversy, R6?

It's everywhere. Not only on Twitter.

by Anonymousreply 7May 27, 2020 12:01 PM

Close your Twitter accounts and leave if you’re bothered by this or anything else that Twitter is doing.

I don’t understand how complaining on their platform will help things. The only thing they care about is money, and if enough people quit Twitter, they will change their policies very quickly.

by Anonymousreply 8May 27, 2020 12:04 PM

The least these money hungry Twitter execs could do is give him a 24h timeout for any violations. Normal users get those all the time and it would teach him a lesson.

They should ask the president of the United States to follow the rules in the future or kick him off the platform. It's just disgusting they have two sets of rules for POTUS and everyone else because of $$$.

by Anonymousreply 9May 27, 2020 12:06 PM

Tney're probably also scared of him retaliating R9, which he probably would do.

by Anonymousreply 10May 27, 2020 12:10 PM

Yet again, Jack Dorsey is a gutless, rapacious pig. And they can't or won't get a handle on the bot mayhem. Twitter management is a third-rate clown show.

by Anonymousreply 11May 27, 2020 12:14 PM

They could remove the tweet at least, instead of saying "gosh, sorry it's so hurtful to the families of the deceased, but we're gonna leave it up no matter how libelous and awful it is."

by Anonymousreply 12May 27, 2020 12:15 PM

We had another thread yesterday where people were saying Twitter was doing better than ever r8, and I looked it up and discovered that in fact they hadn't had a profitable year except for 2018, every other year they've lost money, and they're predicting they'll lose again this year.

I have to wonder how Dorsey makes his money. Is he fudging the numbers to make it look unprofitable while he quietly pockets the actual profits? He's immensely rich, but how, if Twitter has only had one profitable year in its life?

Forgot I can't link to it, it's a CNN article called "Twitter records its first annual profit, but it is losing millions of users"

by Anonymousreply 13May 27, 2020 12:19 PM

[quote] Calling Trump “the most epic internet troll of all time,” Swisher said that Twitter’s business is not improved by Trump’s tweetstorms and, in fact, may ultimately be harmed by the president’s affinity for the platform.

ROFL!

It's a very well-earned label.

by Anonymousreply 14May 27, 2020 12:26 PM

I understand their concern.

by Anonymousreply 15May 27, 2020 12:30 PM

Jack is too busy starving himself and cultivating his B.O. to care

by Anonymousreply 16May 27, 2020 12:34 PM

Are people as outraged by the conspiracy theories promulgated on DL? Be consistent.

by Anonymousreply 17May 27, 2020 12:52 PM

It's one thing for people to idly discuss conspiracy theories on a message board and another for the president of the United States to blast them to the world on Twitter.

by Anonymousreply 18May 27, 2020 12:55 PM

^That is what the dumb blonde press secretary was telling people last night. Joe discussed this on a show years ago so it's ok for the president to spread conspiracy theories. Journalists told her again and again that it's totally different if private citizens discuss something or the president of the United States spreads conspiracy theories to 80m followers. The dumb bitch wasn't having it and left the presser.

by Anonymousreply 19May 27, 2020 1:09 PM

I'm glad I don't have a Twitter account.

I couldn't in good conscience use their platform, knowing that they allow trump to use it the way he does.

by Anonymousreply 20May 27, 2020 2:05 PM

R20 It SHOULD be the way they let ANYONE use the platform. Do you know how many lifeless shits tweet? For fucks sake, they ARE the TwitterTard mob. The turd(s) circling down my toilet, when I flush, have a greater impact on my life than a bunch of witless millennials....typing...280 characters of....OUTRAGE.

by Anonymousreply 21May 27, 2020 3:04 PM

Actions have consequences.

by Anonymousreply 22May 27, 2020 3:22 PM

[quote]The employees of social media companies are 70 to 90 percent white men, she said, and most of them simply don’t understand what it’s like to be bullied, stalked or marginalized.

White men are fucking evil and should be stripped of leadership positions.

by Anonymousreply 23May 27, 2020 3:28 PM

Wasn't there a Twitter employee found in Jack's office dead of a head wound?

by Anonymousreply 24May 27, 2020 3:32 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!