Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Rachel Maddow is going after Bernie live

Interviewing him. She's politely hammering him.

by Anonymousreply 37March 5, 2020 9:33 PM

She is indeed. She’s challenging him respectfully. Even he is calm and not screaming and waggling his old bones in her face.

by Anonymousreply 1March 5, 2020 1:47 AM

Her face is like one large throbbing cuntflap.

by Anonymousreply 2March 5, 2020 1:48 AM

Berniebro or Russiabot at R2?

by Anonymousreply 3March 5, 2020 1:50 AM

I don't care for Bernie, but I don't care what that cunt Rachel does anymore.

Ever since her despicable treatment of Mayor Pete, it's become clear how much that show is just a testament to her own ego.

Every time Rachel and Nicolle Wallace are on a panel together, Nicolle eats her lunch. It's because Rachel is not a journalist, she has no sources on the inside (which Nicolle and Andrea Mitchell and even Lawrence O'Donnell do and Chris Matthews did), and now that the New York Times' journalists are barred from appearing on her show, 90% of the time, it's just her bloviating and self-indulging. She gets these big interviews and never, ever breaks news.

by Anonymousreply 4March 5, 2020 1:51 AM

Yasssssssss

by Anonymousreply 5March 5, 2020 1:52 AM

Rachel was one of the biggest reasons the Russia nonsense got so big. She’s a mentally ill conspiracy theorist who shouldn’t be anywhere near a position of informing the public about anything.

by Anonymousreply 6March 5, 2020 1:53 AM

Correct

by Anonymousreply 7March 5, 2020 1:55 AM

I love Rachel Maddow, everyone else can fuck the hell off.

by Anonymousreply 8March 5, 2020 1:57 AM

Her journalism degree is from where?

by Anonymousreply 9March 5, 2020 1:58 AM

Her ass

by Anonymousreply 10March 5, 2020 1:58 AM

That was a pretty good interview actually. Sanders came off as well as he could. I was happy to hear him say that if Biden has the most delegates going into the convention then he thinks he should be the nominee.

Rachel is publicly pleading with the Biden campaign for an interview. She just said they’ve ignored her all campaign season Biden campaign knows Biden could never handle an hour with Rachel.

by Anonymousreply 11March 5, 2020 2:01 AM

The enemy of my enemy is my friend

by Anonymousreply 12March 5, 2020 2:02 AM

She must do a lot of Adderall to be so relentlessly, stridently annoying.

by Anonymousreply 13March 5, 2020 2:04 AM

"She earned a degree in public policy at Stanford in 1994. At graduation, she was awarded the John Gardner Fellowship. She was the recipient of a Rhodes Scholarship and began her postgraduate study in 1995 at Lincoln College, Oxford. She had also been awarded a Marshall Scholarship the same year but turned it down in favor of the Rhodes. This made her the first open lesbian to win an international Rhodes Scholarship.[a][24] In 2001, she earned a Doctor of Philosophy (DPhil) in politics at the University of Oxford. Her thesis is titled HIV/AIDS and Health Care Reform in British and American Prisons."

Doctor Maddow has an impressive CV.

But her begging to interview Joe, after she shit on Pete and did mercy interviews for other white guys shows how poor her interview decisions have been. She needs to interview Elizabeth into the grave. She needs to interview Kirsten Gillibrand till the cows come home. She couls turn Amy into a cohost. I would not be surprised if Biden waited till he clinched the nomination before giving her an interview.

She seriously offers no advantage to the Biden campaign.

Poor Madcow can go fishing for a while.

by Anonymousreply 14March 5, 2020 2:19 AM

R4, what does any of that have to do with Maddow hammering Sanders?

by Anonymousreply 15March 5, 2020 2:30 AM

Can you hate her like a man?

When you talk about hating Piers Morgan you don't talk about his face looking like a ball sack or a chode penis.

Hate her like you would a man.

by Anonymousreply 16March 5, 2020 2:37 AM

R16 = humorless lesbian

by Anonymousreply 17March 5, 2020 2:40 AM

r15, at the end of the Sanders interview, Rachel invested significant capital in wanting to interview Biden. r11 saw that. I was commenting on that.

r14.

by Anonymousreply 18March 5, 2020 2:41 AM

"When you talk about hating Piers Morgan you don't talk about his face looking like a ball sack or a chode penis."

I do, R16.

by Anonymousreply 19March 5, 2020 2:51 AM

It was interesting to see how Rachel took a ton of time off last summer, but as soon as Nicolle Wallace's ratings (and star) began seriously rising and she started getting regular mainstage anchoring assignments, Ms. Maddow has been in that chair every night of the week.

by Anonymousreply 20March 5, 2020 3:22 AM

Oh, brother, R20. No relation to the thread's topic.

by Anonymousreply 21March 5, 2020 4:31 AM

LOVE how Rachel challenged him. You can see Sanders getting pissed off when she hammered on how he's not expanding his base either to black voters or middle aged and older voters.

by Anonymousreply 22March 5, 2020 4:53 AM

And she said one of his wins was "statistically insignificant."

BERN!!!

by Anonymousreply 23March 5, 2020 4:57 AM

Did she point out to Sanders that he has been been grousing about socialism for 60 years and he is yet to expand that base? The problem is not socialism. The problem is Sanders.

by Anonymousreply 24March 5, 2020 5:00 AM

did Bernie Bros torch her on twitter yet for not shining Sanders' shoes and instead daring to ask tough questions?

by Anonymousreply 25March 5, 2020 5:02 AM

[quote]Rachel is publicly pleading with the Biden campaign for an interview. She just said they’ve ignored her all campaign season Biden campaign knows Biden could never handle an hour with Rachel.

Maybe because Rachel has been in the tank for Warren all primary season?

Also why can't NYT reporters appear on her show anymore? I

by Anonymousreply 26March 5, 2020 5:05 AM

Bernie is always this irritating loser hanging on at the edges and squawking.

by Anonymousreply 27March 5, 2020 5:17 AM

uh oh just checked twitter and a lot of verified media people were commenting on this interview. Most seem to agree Sanders didn't come off too great at various points

by Anonymousreply 28March 5, 2020 5:18 AM

What are they saying, R28?

by Anonymousreply 29March 5, 2020 5:22 AM

I thought she was respectful and he was not always honest. He needs to be a Senator.

by Anonymousreply 30March 5, 2020 5:37 AM

Rachel Maddow, interviewing Bernie tonight, asked him about her brilliant idea for a Biden/Bernie unity ticket... Lol

by Anonymousreply 31March 5, 2020 6:02 AM

[quote] He needs to be a Senator.

He needs to be a retiree. He needs to be in his home office writing socialist polemic for the party. His actual party.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 32March 5, 2020 12:19 PM

R20 What a weird post. Do you think if Nicolle Wallace weren’t thriving on MSNBC, Maddow never would have returned from vacation?

by Anonymousreply 33March 5, 2020 12:22 PM

Maddow is a super star on MSNBC. Her ratings are up, and she gets huge interviews. I don't don't think she has anything to worry about. Neither does Nichole Wallace. They both bring greatness to MSNBC in their own ways.

by Anonymousreply 34March 5, 2020 2:38 PM

R34= Simp

by Anonymousreply 35March 5, 2020 2:39 PM

Maddow is the biggest ratings draw on MSNBC. Sorry, Rachel haters, but that's a fact. She doesn't have anything to worry about, from Wallace or anyone else there.

by Anonymousreply 36March 5, 2020 3:54 PM

She the most talented and competent journalist on TV- and smart as they come. She cornered him beautifully and collegially. (By the way, I thought she was fine with Pete- and Bernie for that matter.) He will essentially not seek or work with those who do not agree with him 100%. That is why he has been such a mediocre Senator (no major bills and only a few insignificant minor). He will not work with people. His way or the highway. That's why he should not be President. Of course he would be vastly better than Trump. He is a decent man and most of his progressive policies are on target. But he will have no success with anything if he does not lead the entire party and help keep the House and turn the Senate. Bernie only campaigns for Bernie.

by Anonymousreply 37March 5, 2020 9:33 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!