Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Lawrence Of Arabia

What do you think really happened to him in Dera'a? He said he was sexually abused and "lost his integrity", but that could mean anything. The majority of scholars also seem to think he lied and was never captured in the first place, let alone sodomized. So, what is the DL consensus on what happened to T. E. Lawrence? Did he really have his fill of uncut Arab cock or was it all a farce?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 9December 7, 2020 9:59 AM

Uncut Arab cock???

Oh the humanity!

by Anonymousreply 1January 31, 2020 4:58 AM

Maybe they beat him and DIDN'T rape him, and he never got over the disappointment.

by Anonymousreply 2January 31, 2020 5:00 AM

R1 Circumcision is almost universal among Muslims.

by Anonymousreply 3January 31, 2020 5:02 AM

I love this story. I first heard this story in "92 when I was in college. He was definitely sodomized and raped.

Here's why:

Whenever upper level military officials were captured, this was a form of degradation that they inflicted on Officers Only. Many officers reported being raped while held captive. It was always a gang rape. And it was about humiliation. Lawrence of Arabia's records of his post captive interview disappeared mysteriously. It doesn't take a forensic scientist to deduce what happened. He was an officer, captured, and what befell his peers, befell his ass! When men were raped, they would often get erections during the rape because the prostate was being stimulated. They would also ejaculate, which made it doubly humiliating and confusing for the men being raped!

by Anonymousreply 4January 31, 2020 5:04 AM

Yes, he was raped.

What amazes me is how candid he was about the ordeal in his book.

It was first published in 1922 and he certainly didn’t shy away from admitting what happened.

by Anonymousreply 5January 31, 2020 5:09 AM

Yeah, well, he wrote about his Bedouin soldiers getting it on with each other on PAGE TWO of "The Seven Pillars of Wisdom", in addition to his account of the gang rape. This was so astonishingly frank for a book published in the 1920s that I always assumed Lawrenxe was gay. Straight men just dont write about such things if they can help it, and back then, they didnt write about such things without condemnation or expressions of revulsion.

So I suspect Lawrence of being gay, and being gang raped had to be just as agonizing and traumatic for a gay man as a straight one.

by Anonymousreply 6January 31, 2020 6:56 AM

R6 Historians can’t accept that Lawrence was gay, they call him “axesual”...

by Anonymousreply 7December 7, 2020 9:39 AM

Was he a power bottom rapee?

by Anonymousreply 8December 7, 2020 9:58 AM

OP why the Freudian mistake on Muslim circumcision? Does the idea of the Arab he-man brute disturb you so, that you had to add "uncut cock" to make it especially appalling/exciting? Or are you just a dumb American who had no idea that Muslims are CUT and clean and live by honor, an honor which is not, of course, Western.

by Anonymousreply 9December 7, 2020 9:59 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!