Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.
Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.
Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.
Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.
After he'd been complaining for a month or so that Iowa is too white to go first.
[quote]Unfortunately, when we find individuals who do not garner the support they were striving for... the real question should be: If the individual was in the top three, would this even be an issue?
Thoroughly burned, honey. And they're right, he had nothing to say about the primary order right until the moment he failed to qualify for the debates because his polling was so abysmal.
| by Anonymous | reply 1 | December 11, 2019 7:17 PM |
This was in response to him holding a forum on this issue in Iowa, basically telling Iowans to their faces why Iowa shouldn't go first.
Yes, this piece I'm linking to here is pretty vicious, but it's also a nice short write-up of just how complex this question of the primary state order really is. Highly recommended read. Went in convinced the order should be changed, but now I'm not so certain anymore.
| by Anonymous | reply 1 | December 11, 2019 7:17 PM |
Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.
Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!
