Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

NYT: Epstein, Blackmail, and a Lucrative "Hot List"

A shadowy hacker claimed to have the financier’s sex tapes. Two top lawyers wondered: What would the men in those videos pay to keep them secret?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 24December 2, 2019 11:02 AM

That looks like Vice's Shane Smith.

by Anonymousreply 1November 30, 2019 1:57 PM

When a big bear of a man in flip-flops showed up with a bottle of Japanese whiskey promising to deliver evidence implicating some of the world’s richest and most powerful men in an epic cover-up of sexual misconduct, our reporters were hooked.

The man went by a pseudonym, Patrick Kessler, and he said he had terabytes of video surveillance from Jeffrey Epstein’s residences and other materials that, if true, would validate theories Epstein was engaged in an extensive blackmail operation. Kessler said he would share it all with The New York Times.....

by Anonymousreply 2November 30, 2019 2:33 PM

As his outrageous story began to unravel, he illuminated something else: how two of America’s top lawyers considered using the promised trove of Epstein information.

This special hourlong episode of “The Weekly” tells the wild story of four Times reporters chasing one of the biggest stories of the year – if only it were true. In the course of their reporting, they get a rare glimpse into the secretive world of legal settlements in which wealthy people are allowed to make damning evidence disappear.

by Anonymousreply 3November 30, 2019 2:34 PM

Accusations of sexual predation had followed Epstein for years, though it wasn’t until his arrest in July that the scope of his abuse became clear.

Epstein long maintained ties to a number of high-profile public officials, celebrities and business moguls.

In an interview with Times columnist James B. Stewart a year before Epstein killed himself in jail, he claimed to know potentially damaging or embarrassing secrets about his rich and powerful friends.

David Boies, long considered one of the top litigators in the country, represents five of Epstein’s accusers who are suing his estate for unspecified damages. They’re also trying to extend the window when victims of sex crimes can bring civil claims to court.

Boies suffered “an unprecedented public relations disaster” after his longtime client Harvey Weinstein was branded a sexual predator and another of his clients, the blood-testing firm Theranos, on whose board Boies served, was exposed as a fraud.

The New York Times fired Boies’s firm, which was representing the newspaper on unrelated matters, after learning he was involved in efforts to smear Weinstein’s victims and deceive Times reporters.

John Stanley Pottinger, a lawyer, former investment banker and best-selling novelist, has been working with Boies to represent women who say they were abused by Epstein. Pottinger’s legal career dates to the Nixon administration, when he served as an assistant attorney general for civil rights.

by Anonymousreply 4November 30, 2019 2:36 PM

So the Epstein sex tapes are the new Hitler sex movies?

by Anonymousreply 5November 30, 2019 3:29 PM

Do people really think that Epstein killed himself? I don’t give two shits about that man, but I think he was assassinated.

by Anonymousreply 6November 30, 2019 4:25 PM

Whatever it is, if this hacker is for real, they are paying it as we speak.

by Anonymousreply 7November 30, 2019 4:38 PM

It doesn't require a violent stretch of the imagination that Epstein had every square inch of all his residences covered by hidden cameras. Handy blackmail fodder. If the footage from these cameras was seized by whomever it was that raided his residences, who would give a flying fuck about what this guy's flogging? It's already catalogued. Another non-brilliant move by the formerly brilliant NYT. That news organ wot had credibility, around a thousand years ago.

by Anonymousreply 8November 30, 2019 5:31 PM

So did he have the tapes and were they real or not? I am not going to read a bunch of NYT turd reporters long-winded article if there's no "there" there.

by Anonymousreply 9November 30, 2019 5:35 PM

There were no tapes and it was an elaborate fraud.

by Anonymousreply 10November 30, 2019 5:41 PM

Funny how many people will refuse to read a highly entertaining news story that takes about 10 minutes to read, but when it's eventually made into an endless, bloated 2-1/2 hour movie, they're all over it.

by Anonymousreply 11November 30, 2019 6:04 PM

I'm not interested in reading a story if it's about a fraud and I wouldn't watch the movie either. There are so many real stories worth pursuing that it seems very self-indulgent to write about something like this.

by Anonymousreply 12November 30, 2019 6:09 PM

Boies is the Clintons' double agent who works with the victims so that he can screen and probably "misplace" evidences.

by Anonymousreply 13November 30, 2019 7:04 PM

I am sure Russian Intelligence or Mossad raided that place a long time ago and got their copies. Maybe Epstein himself traded with them a few secret recordings in the past.

by Anonymousreply 14November 30, 2019 7:44 PM

In other words, there are no tapes and this was a blackmail attempt.

by Anonymousreply 15November 30, 2019 8:53 PM

[quote] They’re also trying to extend the window when victims of sex crimes can bring civil claims to court.

So that lawyers like David Boies can reap unimaginable fees from these cases, whether on the plaintiff or defense side.

by Anonymousreply 16November 30, 2019 8:54 PM

R6, not everything is a conspiracy. He had every reason to kill himself

by Anonymousreply 17November 30, 2019 9:03 PM

Boies is a deeply suspect character.

by Anonymousreply 18November 30, 2019 9:07 PM

Yesterday Meghan Markle was seen holding hands and kissing Prince Andrew in a Woking cafe. At first it was difficult to recognise the former Duchess as she has had extensive cosmetic surgery.

Friends said that they have been business partners, and grifters, for decades and have only recently become lovers. Meghan stated that their shared sense of not belonging and being trolled and abused by the media had brought them together. Prince Andrew smiled inanely and stated that he could not comment as "Mummy told me not to speak to the media people anymore and Charlie won't like it either".

The Duke of Sussex was asked for comment but did not return calls, emails or texts. This afternoon he was located at Brighton beach sucking Sarah Ferguson's fungal infected toes.

by Anonymousreply 19December 2, 2019 7:55 AM

wrong thread AGAIN sorry

by Anonymousreply 20December 2, 2019 7:57 AM

David Boies, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, and the Clintons were all linked at the hip.

dinner with Harvey Weinstein and his wife, Georgina Chapman, and the Clintons in New York in December 2016.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21December 2, 2019 8:48 AM

Oh, so now David Boies is a villain? Et tu, gay married couples?

I read the article when it first appeared online and found it to be one of the most bizarre, convoluted, cockamamie NYT offerings since the Jayson Blair scandal. One glaring gaffe was a photograph of Boise mis-captioned as being that of Alan Dershowitz.

Russia, if you're listening...distract!

by Anonymousreply 22December 2, 2019 9:03 AM

I believe David Boies has been a villain for quite some time by his own undoing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23December 2, 2019 9:33 AM

Boies was Weinstein’s lawyer and harassed the victims to scare them into not pressing charges

by Anonymousreply 24December 2, 2019 11:02 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!