Cut vs uncut

You can do so much more with an uncut cock. That extra skin can be fun to play with. I prefer uncut, as long as it's clean.

Uncut doesn’t even look like a dick. No attraction at all. It’s like they’re not even naked at all.

Although uncut cocks are more common now in the U.S., when I was growing up, they were a very rare thing. So on the few occasions where I saw an uncut cock, I found them fascinating and sexy and I really wanted to sleep with a guy who had one.

R2 sounds like you have a weird and warped perception of uncut dicks to me.

The majority of uncut guys, when erect, their foreskin pulls back to the point they just look the same as a cut dick anyway. It's unusual to still have the foreskin covering the glans penis during erection and usually indicates the foreskin is too long/tight and circumcision may be needed.

I'm uncut and the majority of dicks I've interacted with have also been uncut and I have experienced zero negative effects, whereas with a cut dick there is less 'give' for want of a better term which makes handling them slightly more difficult.

I would be interested to know what people think are the negatives of uncut dicks. People sometimes cite poor hygiene but if you wash regularly that's not an issue so if you've experienced that with an uncut dick it speaks more to the man than the dick.

This should have been a pole... er... I mean poll...

[quote]The majority of uncut guys, when erect, their foreskin pulls back to the point they just look the same as a cut dick anyway.

Not true. They do not look the same at all. I’ve seen enough erect uncut dicks on Chaturbate to know they look very different.

R5 I am too stupid/new here to have figured that out. Also, didn’t think about it.

-OP

Some uncut crusaders are mental. Because something is made a certain way doesn't mean it should be. Mother Nature makes mistakes often. I'm first to emphasize I'm not God. If people don't want to believe established evidence, make an appointment with a urologist as I did to learn the differences. Uncut dicks have multiple portals-of-entry for STIs that cut dicks do not. Have I ever turned down an uncut man based on that? NO!

Jeiwish men and Arab men usually. are usually cut due to religious beliefs. They're also often hot, IMHO. Best wishes, OP.

[quote]I would be interested to know what people think are the negatives of uncut dicks.

Pure, unfettered cosmetic ugliness. SO unattractive. Anteater-y.

R9, the topic of ethics requires I withhold an opinion other than looks are entirely subjective. However, I've seen both attractive and ugly dicks in both cut and uncut!

R8

I love, love, love giving head. For me, it seems like it takes uncut guys a lot longer to cum. I've experienced one guy with horrible urine smell but powered through it...

Good for you, r10 / r8, but the question [bold]I[/bold] was answering was what [bold]I[/bold] thought were "the negatives of uncut dicks."

R11 for me the opposite. Had a few guys I could go down on for 2-3 hours. Those are talented men! With 1 exception all are cut. 1 cut and 1 uncut would have multiple orgasms, stay erect and tell me to keep going! The uncut South American is "neat freak" so I put my tongue in his foreskin and made him experience heaven and nirvana! BTW, I'm versatile, but an expert cocksucker...just my "gift" from Mother Nature I guess.

R8/R10

I've been with 3 uncut men and, unfortunately, they all smelled down there. I tried to power through and even suggested a shower before we fucked as a little bit of foreplay and they still smelt off. I figured three strikes and you're out. Guess it's not for me.

No matter how much I clean and scrub mine, I still have a bit of a smell after... I don't know why--wish I was cut.

When our son was born (we had him via surrogacy), we decided not to have him circumcised. We're both cut - but we thought he might enjoy not being cut. What do you DLers think about that?

So is this the trade off?

Cut = better hygiene?

Uncut = more sensation?

R17 I'm undecided on that because I'm cut and my dick works and feels fine. R16, if you're American, this is the law. A parent or parents have the legal right to have their son circumcized. That decision is up to you. My recommendation is if you do make that decision, go to the best urological surgeon available and have it done in the best surgical facility or hospital available. R15, that's always going to happen. A male friend of mine married an uncut man whose hygiene is stellar and beyond reproach. He confided in me they have the same issue. Please don't over-scrub your foreskin! You either have to live with it or get cut.

R13

I find it so weird when people generalize all cut and uncut dicks. A lot of them both have different looks and feeling. I've also seen my fair share of good looking and ugly looking dicks, either cut or uncut.

R12 I'm not here to criticize. I prefer cut, but I'm not going to turn down a good man who's uncut for that reason unless there's a fixable problem he refuses to resolve. A experienced bi or gay men knows the "negatives" of both. No reason to publish them here.

R10/R13

There's already been a thread on this. Would it have killed you to have done a search first, OP? Why are you so inconsiderate? I mean, really. The least you could have done was post a pic of an uncut and a cut dick. Really OP.

R21 I don't have a problem with OP. I don't like to post pics because I know this site or others it cooperates with "spy" on my computer. I'm not naive like I was when I was 18.

R20

Foreskins are a 100% deal-breaker for me. They don’t clean as easily as their owners think.

Circumcised penises call to mind American prudery. Also, knowing that your uncut partner gets more pleasure out of sex than his cut counterparts is a turn-on in itself.

I love uncut dick, it really does look better in my opinion. The glans are smooth and shiny. Also, some circumcision scars are truly hideous...

R25 a glans shouldn't be smooth and shiny = slimy

You mean dry r26. Eew.

Genuinely it doesn't matter. I don't particularly have a more exciting experience with one over the other.

My guess would be a person who thinks a cut is dry and an uncut dick tastes good is a smoker. I taste things so well I can have a new food dish and determine the ingredients and recipe just by taste. I've only had one uncut dick that was acceptable from the perspective of my tastebuds, but did I say anything to any of the uncut men? Absolutely not!

I guarantee you that many of us don't care. I live with a strange case: a man who was uncut, who chose to be cut, in his 20s. We never talked about it after the first few weeks.. If you care about a guy, you'll get over it.

I love cut and uncut equally. Of course cheese is a turn-off but I don't mine the odour of urine.

I do love the look of a fat mushroom head on a cut dick, no lie. It's extremely hot.

Much prefer cut. Agree with OP - there are uncut obsessives on here to the point it’s almost a fetish. I don’t mind it - but because I grew up on cut guys, they are naturally more appealing.

R16, I am very grateful my parents had me circumcised at birth. Very happy with my cock in general. However, if I had grown up with a smegmatron, I imagine that's what I'd prefer. It's what would seem normal, just as cut now seems.

Those advocating and promoting circumcision don't want to change their religious practice but also fear being singled out from the general population by this marker. It's clever and has worked in the US.

I'm uncut but prefer cut (unless its a BBC)

I was multilated at birth, enjoy docking with uncut pals.

I was cut as a teenager and hence I'm one of the few who know the difference. I'm bisexual so all my sons will be cut, that's my promise and will be one of the first acts of fatherly love from me to them.

R38, what advantages did you notice after getting snipped?

America really is just a mosaic of cults. I don't picture it lasting another century.

In a country that prides itself on personal freedom, and personal choice, is it morally necessary to have a view and wanting to force your choice/views on another individual?

^^^cult or uncult?

R16 Good. His body his choice.

I suck a lot of dick.

If uncircumcised, I simply refuse to suck it--unless he has showered and scrubbed with soap first. The stench of piss is disgusting and almost always present on uncircumcised cock.

Don't even get me started on the other nasty smells lurking underneath the foreskin. Though, my ex was uncircumcised and managed to always smell and taste fresh.

I do prefer the feel of an uncircumcised cock when getting fucked but due to hygiene issues, I definitely prefer sucking circumcised.

R43, so:

cut = is better for oral?

uncut = better for anal?

I'm the opposite. I prefer uncut for sucking and don't care either way for anal.

Yeah, this requires so much thought.

DH is cut so have never experienced uncut. But would like to some day. The curiosity is killing me. Sigh, maybe in another life.

Well done R46 . The beauty of a perfect cut cock is hard to beat. Aesthetically more interesting

R47 once you go uncut you'll never go back to cut. It happened to me.

Do you really consider R46 as seeing that guy naked? I don’t. To me, he’s still completely covered and I haven’t seen his dick yet. It’s like he’s still wearing VPL underwear.

r46 quelle atrocité

R46 would scare me straight

Short foreskin, best of both words: a big mushroom head in full view when hard plus a shiny pink head, no scar, foreskin is not wrinkly the gliding over the head looks hot (and it's fun to jerk/play with).

When I'm chatting with a guy and I find out he is uncut I begin to pressure him into not washing it for a couple days before we meet.

The first uncut dick I came into contact with was attached to a beautiful green eyed guy from Argentina. He didn't have a lot of foreskin; just the right amount. When I pulled it back it revealed the most beautiful pink mushroom head glans I'd ever seen. He was sooo much more responsive to my sucking. Running my tongue across his frenulum elicited the most erotic noises from him, and I got him off in a matter of minutes. Since then I've had a thing for uncut guys and have never, not once, come across anyone who had an odor.

America is a land of contradictions isn't it? Thanksgiving and Black Friday around the same time. Saying you are for personal freedom then interfering with the right of a child.

I'm uncut and that's my preference but by no means a requirement (nor even an especially strong preference) in a perfect world, just as I prefer big dicks and hairy asses and pendulous balls - it's a preference, not a requirement for most reasonable people.

Me too R54 🔥🔥🔥😜

I'm cut and I prefer uncut men. I think they look more attractive, they are easier to give handjobs and blowjobs to, they have a much more sensitive glans, and they glide more easily into and out of whatever opening they are penetrating.

(That said, I don't use a man's dick as much of a criterion when I decide whether I like him enough to pursue a relationship. Character, personality, sense of humor, and how fun/hot/considerate/creative/adventurous he is during sex is much more important to me than details of a body part he can't change.)

Also, it's the way the human body was designed/evolved to serve us best.

Unless you live in a desert environment where there is a likelihood of getting sand/dirt under the foreskin and not having water to keep it clean, there is seldom a need to cut it off. Many men at the circumcision restoration site Thunder's Place say when they restored their foreskin, sex became better than it ever was before, because their glans regained its sensitivity and is no longer numb. A lot of those men say they couldn't cum with a blow job before, because they didn't have enough sensation in the head of their dick to make it happen.

R38, if you really want to do a loving act for your sons, how about allowing them to make the decision whether to surgically alter their bodies? Not every cut man is grateful to his parents for what some consider to be mutilation.

If you're so convinced cutting off random body parts is a loving thing to do, why not have their earlobes removed? They aren't necessary, either, though most people wouldn't give them up voluntarily.

I think the people who are grossed out by uncut are really only grossed out by the very wrinkly ones like on R46. The ones smooth and even textured seem to not get any complaints.

Age 26 here. Last summer, I was seeing the cutest Hungarian guy. He was Hungarian by birth but adopted by US couple. Tight and nicely built. My first time w an uncut guy. He was hung huge but liked to bottom. So things worked out well. I lived his uncut cock. Not a lot of foreskin. Beautifully shaped glans. Damn I miss him.

[quote]Since then I've had a thing for uncut guys and have never, not once, come across anyone who had an odor.

That sounds unusual.

You're lucky.

My dad was circumcised when he was 27, so when my brothers and I were born he and my mom made sure we were circumcised before we left the hospital. When my brothers had their sons, my dad was very vocal insisting my nephews be circumcised. They were and it caused a lot of bad feelings between one of my sisters-in-law and my dad that exists today.

R63, is it the sisters-in-law who are unhappy with the decision to circ? Are the nephews themselves happy with it?

There are pros and cons to each one, and since nobody decides what they get at birth, this argument is stupid.

I will say that as an uncut guy with a retractable foreskin, I had the biggest surprise of my teenage life when I discovered there was a "second" way to jerk off. All I had to do was pull back the foreskin with one hand, lube up, and jerk off like a cut guy would. Since my foreskin makes my glans super sensitive, the climax is fucking INTENSE unsheathed. So I win and thread closed.

[quote] [R63], is it the sisters-in-law who are unhappy with the decision to circ? Are the nephews themselves happy with it?

Between three brothers, I have seven nephews and they are all under 12 years old so I don't know if they are happy or unhappy with it. My one sister-in-law was dead set against their son being cut when he was born 4 or 5 years ago but my brother backed up by our dad won the argument. According to my brother SIL is still pissed off about it. They just have the one boy and two girls, so the issue never came up again. My dad's reasoning is get it done as a baby so you never have to go through it as an adult like he did.

R65 - thanks for explaining that. I always wondered how uncut guys sensitivity was affected.

So R66 - why did your dad have it done at 27?

Not sure what kind of skanky hos you guys are going out with. I've only run into one or two smelly uncut dicks in all my years of sucking. And one of them it was just that I went down on him (my bf) immediately after he got off a 15-hour flight, with no shower... It is not normal for uncut men to smell or taste bad.

It's a given that the recovery from a circumcision is easier for an infant than for a grown man -But only men who grew up uncut and were sexually active before getting circumcised are in a position to comment on the pros and cons. And even then you have to consider their reason for having the operation so late in life. If was because of phimosis or other problems, of course the operation will be seen as an improvement.

The foreskin is highly sensitive, along with the frenulum, which is often cut away as part of the operation. In my experience of sucking uncut guys, they are more sensitive to tongue and lip movements than cut guys. Their glans is more sensitive as well, because it isn't constantly rubbing against clothing. Circumcision was not all that common in America outside of Jewish culture until the age of the anti-sex quacks like John Harvey Kellogg who advocated it it made the penis less sensitive, thereby making masturbation less attractive. And having the operation certainly stopped men from jerking off for longer than eating a bowl of Corn Flakes ever did.

I love to play with cut or uncut men. That's not what I use to select a sex partner. But given a choice, I prefer uncut. Since I'm cut, I'm very happy that we all like different things!

Cut. Uncut looks weird and seems too hard to manage. Only on the DL is there a fetish for the uncut.

Uncut. Cut looks weird with its dried up, desensitized and scarred discolorations that Americans don't even fucking recognize because they've normalized the ugliness of the results of their little boy penis cutting ritual.

You circ fetishists, men and women, straight and gay are gross.

[quote] So [R66] - why did your dad have it done at 27?

I don't remember what it's called but his foreskin wouldn't go back properly.

Phimosis, R72.

And it's easy to fix that with a much less serious procedure. They can make a small nick in the foreskin, just enough to let it slide back. No circ necessary.

On old guys in the locker room uncut sometimes looks more like vagina than penis, and that ain't right.

R73 It's sometimes treated with steroid cream too. Fun fact in Japan circumcision is becoming somewhat popular with adult men because the ideal penis is one with short foreskin that can be kept retracted.

Oh please. I suck dick for a living.

I can confirm that uncut men are much more sensitive to blowjobs. But anyone who says they've never encountered a smelly uncut dick is a damn liar or just inexperienced.

R76 Just a few things you may consider before suggesting others ate liars. By your own admission, you work in the sex industry, so virtue of your experiencing a higher number of cocks, you also experience a higher amount of unclean ones. They also may not be as respectful to a paid cocksucker, so do not care enough to wash beforehand.

Second is that some of us do not mind the natural scent of an intact cock. Those people who express an appreciation for, or a preference for the whole sausage may not consider it "smelly" as you put it. I think only one poster upthread said he never once detected any smell at all whatsoever. Perhaps he doesn't possess as astute a sense of smell as you do.

^ are , not ate!

OP I believe you may have worded your last question wrong, but here goes my answer: I don't believe we as intact blokes are turned on more as a group, if that's really what you did ask and write. If you are questioning why others find intact cocks attractive, you already have received enough answers on that.

I find fault with a perception of those preferring the natural intact cock as having some sort of "fetish". Rather, I should think preferring the surgically altered version, missing bits of it, with scars, and a keratinised or calloused glans to be the ones with a fetish. I also think those blokes who prefer breast implants to have a fetish for something unnatural as well.

I believe there are more anti-foreskin trolls on DL because the demographic skews older. IRL, and on GRINDR, I find no one objecting to my cock because it's intact. Most of my partners are much younger than forty.

[quote]The beauty of a perfect cut cock is hard to beat. Aesthetically more interesting

I agree, R48. Cut cock looks more attractive and aesthetically pleasing to the eye. It looks neater, more properly shaped.

One exception: if the uncut cock is big and attached to a handsome celebrity.

Though I said above that I don't have an especially strong preference, I've seen the aftermath of bad circumcisions more often than I've smelled or tasted filthy foreskin.

Some of you princesses evidently shower and hose and alcohol swab yourselves into an unswerving state of surgical cleanliness (and have scabs on your knees from sucking only the "more properly shaped" dick that smell of your favorite laundry detergent.)

R79 my apologies for incorrectly wording that question. I can see that the many context clues failed to get through your dense uncut head. And I have not gotten enough responses to my intended question as this has devolved into whether circumcision should be performed at all. Additionally I did not claim people’s attraction to it was a fetish. Rather, I have personally heard people discuss a partners uncircumcised penis with exuberance whereas I have not heard the same about circumcised penis or a disdain over uncircumcised penises and was curious what the fascination was there (clearly more exotic here in America; got it). For some odd reason you brought up age; I’m 32 and only fuck fem twinks from the bars (surely the entire discussion ends in “different strokes for different folks”). So you and the entire Team Whole Sausage can choke on each other’s foreskin.

Last time I sucked an uncut cock it was disgusting and I’ll never do it again.

JFK was circumcised at 18 in 1935 due to a venereal disease he had contracted.

R82 I was sincere in my approach to your last question. Your insults are juvenile and uncalled for mate. Many on this forum accuse trans of getting turned on by their own genitals, so figured you were questioning our defence of the natural state of things because it turned us on. After all, everyone or every other poster who is an American suggests it's a fetish to like an intact cock.

I also had explained I wasn't sure. Context or not, your sentence literally asks what about [italic] being [/italic] uncut turns you guys on so much? I'm all for dialogue, and try to understand where people are coming from, especially being a foreign born person living here, but I'm not all for the anti intellectual approach, or the insults.