Jason Momoa protected Emilia Clarke during gratuitous sex scenes: "He was like, 'No, sweetie, this isn't okay'"

Jason knows how to play the friend and get that pussy

Aww love him.

He's trying to make up for his comment about "getting to rape" women that pissed off the feminists a few years ago. But it actually sounds patronizing.

R3? "Emilia Clarke credits..."

It's the first fucking line in the story, so why are you acting like he is putting it out there? She's promoting a film and told the story.

He can help me with my nudity issues ANY TIME

I know a woman who works on sets and robes are always at the ready when there's any kind of nudity, or even near nudity. The idea that Jason would have to bark at the crew to get her one is absurd.

[quote]I know a woman who works on sets and robes are always at the ready when there's any kind of nudity, or even near nudity. The idea that Jason would have to bark at the crew to get her one is absurd.

They weren't on some safe soundstage in Hollywood or London. They were in Croatia with foreign crews. Is your friend and expert on Croatian film making too?

The actress who was originally hired to play Danearys quit because of the nudity. So I imagine that Emilia knew some of what she was in for by accepting the job.

So PR people are scripting interviews to be all woke and male feminist like, great

If you know anything about Jason Momoa R9, you'll know that he was always an activist.

That's why he and Lisa Bonet are such a good match. They're both modern day hippies.

If it was some other actor, I'd agree with you. But not Jason.

Also, Emilia Clarke was telling the story, not Jason himself.

He's filming in my neighborhood this week. Outside my apartment on Saturday! Woo hoo!

where, r11?

Pittsburgh, r12.

A lot of actors careers stall if they decide not to do nudity. Almost every Oscar winning actress has done a nude scene. What I don't get is if you have already gone through the trouble to show off your tits or ass on screen, then just own it. If you complain about it, you might as well have not done it at all.

The way he called her “sweetie” and other pet nicknames despite being a coworker is creepy, especially considering they were playing lovers and he’s twice her size. And as much as I love Emilia, I doubt she would’ve signed on if she had a problem with nudity. It’s HBO, not a disney film, nudity was most definitely included in her contract. But it’s whatever, these GOT actors and actresses can trash the show all they want now that it’s over, it won’t save their careers from returning to the non-existence they were in before the show got big. Emilia’s claim to fame was doing films for The Asylum, Kit’s claim to fame was being in a direct-to-dvd Silent Hill sequel, etc etc. They owe everything to Game Of Thrones. If they want to bitch and moan, that’s fine, but it won’t do their already struggling careers any favors.

R11 lucky duck.

[QUOTE] Now a decade older, Clarke says she's learned how to push back against filmmakers who insist on nude scenes that go beyond what makes sense for a role.

No, sweetie, you won’t have to worry much about that. Your career is over.

Khal Drogo was beating her poor pussy up like it stole something from him.

They were together recently in the Graham Norton Show and their affection fir each other and high regard was evident. They see each other often. I remember that Clarke was hosting a party that evening or the next where Momoa was one of the guests.

"The way he called her “sweetie” and other pet nicknames despite being a coworker is creepy"

No, it's gay. He pings like hell.

[quote]The way he called her “sweetie” and other pet nicknames despite being a coworker is creepy, especially considering they were playing lovers and he’s twice her size.

Christ, STFU. I'm so sick of this shit. He clearly poses no fucking threat to her or any woman. Why don't you save this shit for men who actually are the enemy. This is why #metoo got derailed. Idiots thinking being given red instead of white wine is tantamount to rape.

Clarke seems to be a super-cute bubbly little thing in real life, if I met her and she's anything like her adorable public appearances, I'd call her "sweetie" too.

Sure r7, only the US or UK are civilised, it's not like the American studio had any say in what happened at the location shoot.

Isn't Weinstein American, btw?

R20 this is possibly the cutest thing I’ve ever seen. Beyond adorable!

[quote]The actress who was originally hired to play Danearys quit because of the nudity.

No, she was fired because she sucked. If you know anything about Tamzin Merchant, you know she showed it all on The Tudors and for a much smaller, less important role. Nudity was not the problem with her on GOT.

And I've been saying for a long time now that as soon as people's livelihoods no longer depended on GOT, stories about the way some of the actors were treated were going to start dribbling out. Quite a few were subject to shabby treatment and it won't stay under wraps forever.

[Quote] Quite a few were subject to shabby treatment and it won't stay under wraps forever.

Good! The should be called out on it.

[quote]They were in Croatia with foreign crews.

And foreign directors? Foreign producers? Foreign PAs and ADs and runners?

Give it up.

[quote] While working on the more disturbing scenes, "he was CRYING more than I was!" Clarke said of Momoa.

What is Clarke on about. Momoa was "crying" onset? Over a short play-pretend scene? Was he "crying" in the scenes where he pretended to slit people's throats too?

He deserves all the success coming his way

[quote] Clarke said of Momoa. "He was so KIND and CONSIDERATE...". Clarke says Momoa set the standard for "acceptable" on-set behavior

[quote] Clarke ... remembers him repeatedly calling over to the crew, "Could we get her a FUCKING robe? Could we get her a GODDAMN robe?"

They both sound exhausting, entitled and self-obsessed (with their own actors' clique). So it's "acceptable onset behavior" for C-level no-name actors (as they were back then in Season 1) to shout swear-words at the crew and 'underlings'? That sure doesn't sound "kind" or "considerate" to the crew.

I bet if he simply asked: "Can you PLEASE find a robe?" - the crew would help all the same.

What makes it even more ironic is that the Wardrobe & Styling team is usually staffed by many female workers. So basically Momoa was likely shouting profanities at, and bossing around, OTHER WOMEN (who were paid far less than Clarke) - just to please Clarke. How "feminist" of him, lol.

[Quote] They both sound exhausting, entitled and self-obsessed (with their own actors' clique).

So like alot of actors?

[quote]Aww love him.

Desperate Frau detected.

[quote]He deserves all the success coming his way

He's good looking. And plays the "nice guy" to pull more pussy.

What a mensch, though.

[quote]And I've been saying for a long time now that as soon as people's livelihoods no longer depended on GOT, stories about the way some of the actors were treated were going to start dribbling out. Quite a few were subject to shabby treatment and it won't stay under wraps forever.

What's the shabby treatment?

Was it some "SECRET" that this was a show with nudity and sex scenes? How did you think it was made? As a documentary?

And how did Clarke -- and the complete fake Momoa -- not know about the nudity and sex before filming? Anyone who knows production also knows that they will make it quite clear to an actor ahead of time -- usually when content agents for auditions -- that nudity, sex and violence will be involved in a specific role.

This is all a bunch of bullshit.

*contact agents

R31, lol, yes. But yelling diva-like profanities on set is more the domain of A-list "stars". C-list newbie no-names trying to boss around the crew straight from the very first episodes of a new show is just hilarious.

Emilia Clarke has acting chops.

For porn.

Just like Momoa, frankly.

R34 she doesn’t say she didn’t know there would be nudity on GoT, though, she says she wasn’t given a robe to cover herself between takes.

As for the “you don’t want to disappoint your GoT fans” line, I read it as other directors pressuring her to do nude scenes arguing that she has already shown it all on GoT, which is bullshit.

And btw even if nudity and sex scenes are negotiated well in advance, it still is a power issue. Some actresses with more power can get away with a no nudity clause like SJP, or a double for the nude scenes like Lena Headey, but Emilia was an unknown. Didn’t she say that prior to GoT her major acting job was a fairy at children parties or something.

There is NO WAY she left the hair or makeup trailer without already wearing a robe. She absolutely was walking across the set stark naked while she received blocking.

[quote] And btw even if nudity and sex scenes are negotiated well in advance, it still is a power issue. Some actresses with more power can get away with a no nudity clause like SJP, or a double for the nude scenes like Lena Headey, but Emilia was an unknown.

Most things are negotiated through power. How much you get paid. What type of role you can get. How many demands you can make.

Nudity falls under that standard as well. But the idea that there was something "wrong" with sex and nudity is asinine. She was eager for the role and took it.

The fact that she didn't like certain elements of that role is not some great tragedy. It's a narcissistic, dull point on her part. And asinine on yours to perpetuate and pursue it.

But it fits in well with the #metoo zeitgeist: a whore will fuck Harvey in any way he wants, for a price. But years later they act as if it was "abuse". It was a quid pro quo: fame for whoring, of course. But now that is a crime. Funny, how the women aren't prosecuted for prostitution.

Your Frau "logic" -- 'it was something she didn't want to do, and she had to, waaah' -- is very tiresome. If it was too much for her, she could have refused the role. Maybe she should have. If she had refused it, what would her life be like now? You think anyone would care about her enough to even listen to this boring, illogical story?

She's a lousy actress. And this is one of her worst performances: another "victim".

But remember this: most people take jobs that involve things they'd rather not do. That's the state of most working actors. It is not abuse, particularly when you're told -- LEGALLY -- what is expected of you in the audition and in the contract.

Quit pretending we're living in some puritan age. If women are this delicate, then at some point society will cease to function, because the same women that can't handle nudity/sex/violence or responsibility for their actions, are also the women most likely to loudly DEMAND more responsibility and power in our society. Power over our society.

With power comes responsibility, as Stan Lee would say. But he was just another man that abused women...that were supposed to be his caregivers. At the age of 90+. Yet another example of the #metoo lie, and how abusive women can be within it.

Why must every fucking thing be a conspiracy theory? Even something like not giving her a robe must be put through some stupid conduit of idiocy where some moron comes along and proclaims it IMPOSSIBLE because he knows someone who worked wherever and then others agree.

This isn't hard to believe at all when you're a lower rung performer and also with the million other things going on on the set, they're not thinking about her well-being. They're thinking about the shot and the lighting and the scene itself. Hollywood doesn't cater to you unless you've actually made it.

Hollywood isn't a support group. It's a business where tons of shitty people act shitty. Big surprise.

I don't understand the point of your comment R41.

You're simultaneously trashing the people who didn't give her a robe then defending the fact that they didn't give her a robe.

R41 has never been on a set in her life. Buffoonish. Just like this story from Clarke.

She counts on gullible fangirls, who have zero experience on a set (or evidently with logic), to help push such a ridiculous lie.

Every professional set will have things like robes for main cast members. Every. Single. One.

This is a series that cost a great deal of money from a major studio. They would not open themselves up to lawsuit over something like this.

why are we still talking about GOT? it's fucking OVER! The ending sucked so bad!

R42, welcome to Frau "logic".

Be grateful for gayness.

[quote]He deserves all the success coming his way

Is that the way of saying "all the pussy"?

This is Frau logic: set is oversexed, harming the feels, man, but the sexy guy commiserates and sweet talks me, so I'll fuck him whenever as a sign of my gratitude.

Ugh.

If you watched the "making of" GOT...If I remember correctly, in charge of costume was a married couple. They were a small operation and had to hire many staff as they expanded...not a lot of experience...not sure if they would be in charge of handing out robes to cast. You get the sense that they were overwhelmed a lot (from the program)

[quote]Every professional set will have things like robes for main cast members.

The series had only started, idiot. She wasn't a "star" yet.

I'm making the point that being careless towards the lower rung performers is not that hard to believe,

I'm also the person @R21, that's not something a frau would say.

R48, you're a complete idiot.

A professional set will have standards of professionalism for all main cast members, and essentially standards for all cast and crew to follow. They don't have to be "stars" to get a robe.

You have no clue about how sets are run, clearly. You're creating fan fiction that is fit for a menstruating 13-year old girl.

So let the set call her out for this blatant lie. Clearly she just decided to fuck over the people who actually gave her some fucking robe. To what end? You tell me.

And what you said @ R21 is very much what a Frau would say.

You find Momoa attractive, like Clarke, and thus he will be given leeway that other men will not. This is typical Fish Logic: if the guy is "hot" then suddenly the puritanical mask melts right away.

And you have a distinct lack of logic in general. Just a lot of idiotic emoting. Very fishy. Very Frau.

And fuck you with this fangurl crap. I haven't seen her in anything but GoT, asshole.

[quote]So let the set call her out for this blatant lie. Clearly she just decided to fuck over the people who actually gave her some fucking robe. To what end? You tell me.

Attention. Duh.

Not hard to figure out, particularly when it comes to women simultaneously bragging about the hot guy protecting them and whining about their abuse in the #metoo age. They're all desperate to be seen as "desirable" and "abused". At this point, celeb whores are more and more likely to combine those two elements into each story they tell about themselves as a Marketing Operation.

Again, duh.

Keep it up with the Frau Logic, fish.

Her Last Christmas movie didn't do too well...haven't heard jack shit about it.

Wrong, you fucking moron. Leeway would be thinking it's no big deal if he put her hands on her because he's attractive and don't fucking act like we haven't seen tons of posts on here by gay men who actually HAVE expressed that opinion.

And BTW, shithead, I've been on DL since 2000. How long have you been here?

[quote] And fuck you with this fangurl crap. I haven't seen her in anything but GoT, asshole.

The feels, fam. The feels.

13 and menstruating, huh? But, really, 35 and desperate, is more like. But the mental maturity remains at a child's level, of course.

Yes, all-knowing one, R6. Tell us how the whole world works exactly. Great inductive reasoning you got there.

[quote]And BTW, shithead, I've been on DL since 2000. How long have you been here?

Completely illogical response. Should we all show our DL Tenure Cards before debating you? Do you automatically win if you've been here longer, fish?

Frau Logic, people. Frau "logic",

Inept.

Feels? Did you really just use "feels" and you're calling me a frau?

Now do that dumb line about something being "a mood." On second thought, don't care. Done with this.

R40 you’re getting quite bent out of shape about Clarke and her robe. Why is the idea that actors can demand professional working environment regardless of their status is so offending to you?

[quote]. Leeway would be thinking it's no big deal if he put her hands on her because he's attractive and don't fucking act like we haven't seen tons of posts on here by gay men who actually HAVE expressed that opinion.

Let's put things in logical perspective. 1) you think that Clarke being asked to do a job she agreed to, contractually, is some form of "abuse" and "unprofessional", and 2) that professional sets have no standards as far as how the talent is treated; you actually believe that they had her walk from her trailer, NAKED, to the set. Because you want to believe this moronic story she's crafted.

Further, you somehow think that a story of Momoa "protecting" her and calling her pet names is perfectly fine, even though that's the most unprofessional element here. Why? Not hard to understand: because he's a good looking guy.

Again, Frau "logic". 'He's hot, and makes me feel things, so...it's OKAY!'

Yet you don't think it's okay for her to do a job she was legally contracted for. That's "exploitation".

You are an idiotic, tiresome bore.

Geez, I got rid of the guy carrying on obsessively about the robe thing and half the board got wiped away. Let it go, man. You’re creepily wrapped up (heh) in this topic and desperately want to be right. You must be a JOY in relationships.

[quote]Why is the idea that actors can demand professional working environment regardless of their status is so offending to you?

False premise. She's telling a lie and you're perpetuating it.

Only an idiot would believe the robe story. That is, an idiot without any experience on a professional set.

Thanks for belaboring that, fish.

R62 no joke, 15+ comments from the same person.

[quote]You’re creepily wrapped up (heh) in this topic and desperately want to be right. You must be a JOY in relationships.

And there we have it. The fish can't debate the issue of the robe, and the likelihood of on-set conduct described by Clarke (basically: impossible, if you know anything about professional sets), logically, so she moves to the only thing that women really understand: catty personal shaming.

"Creepy".

All women are being "creeped out" when they're pushed to defend a position logically. Hilarious. Completely predictable.

Also, note this: she complains about how many posts are made by a single poster, while she continues to obsessively reply on this subject herself. Hypocrisy is a bitch. And hers agains shows her lack of logic.

Good work, Frau.

"But I've BEEN HERE SINCE 2000, creep! Now, can we talk about what I really care about: how would you handle yourself in a RELATIONSHIP?" - fish logic

I'm sure Jason was a good guy and took care of her. We all know actors love to add pepper and salt to their stories to spice it up. She might have exaggerated. It wouldn't be the first time...c'mon!

Get a grip.

We can't all be bothered with alt accounts, dear (R64).

But not all of us have been here since 2000, either. It takes time, as you know.

And ignored tells me that this is literally the only thread you've ever posted in. All to defend the rantings from some crazed Frau. Interesting timing, huh?

And BTW, the Frau I was debating (R21/R48 etc) has 9 posts in this thread. Combined with yours, that places the output at 12. So far.

More hypocrisy, and an attempt at personal shaming, in order to avoid debating the topic. Typical Frau.

But please, tell us, how many sets have the cast walk around NAKED between takes? What a moronic argument. So emotional, though.

[quote]Feels? Did you really just use "feels" and you're calling me a frau?

That's called 'impersonation' and 'taunting', fish. But that's beyond your IQ, clearly. Pretty sad that this had to be explained.

But also very funny.

"I'm, like, so done with this." - menstruating fish, aka R59

I love how transparent R59 is: "leaves" the thread, and then R60 immediately shows up to defend R59's position on the robe, while also attempting to continue the personal shaming.

The use of an alt account is way too obvious, R59/R60, as far as timing, grammar and views (which, all, oddly match between the two "separate" fraus).

This has been a fun thread.

Shalom.

R67/R69 ignore tells me that you now have 20 comments on this thread, and also that apart from this one, you only ever left a single comment on the new Charlie’s Angels thread. I still don’t get why Emilia Clarke and her robe is such an issue for you to work yourself into a lather, though.

^Psst....whispers....because he’s cuckoo.....shhhhh

I swear, if next time I watch the movie “The Robe”, and find that Jason Momoa and Emilia Clarke have been substituted into the roles, that crazy robe guy in this thread is going DOWN!

Holy Christ, put the guy who's going on and on and on about how Clarke (and by extension all other women) are in the wrong all the time and half the thread vanishes! He's weirdly obsessed with this topic!

Well I believe her, because "GoT" has been described as "a dumpster fire behind the scenes", and the fact is, most jobs have some aspect that sucks, and the fact that you've agreed to do a shitty job in exchange for pay or the hope of future opportunities doesn't make the suckage go away, or absolve the employer from a responsibility to provide decent working conditions. I've been on jobs where I've been exposed to toxic chemicals or crazy dangerous people, which I took because lots of other jobs involve wading through sewage or being sprayed with pesticides or worse. Because if the choice is between a bad job, a worse job, or unemployment, then people take the bad job, but that still doesn't mean I need to be grateful for the shittier aspects of being employed.

I have the deepest sympathy for anyone employed or supervised by Weirdly Obsessed Guy.

[quote]You must be a JOY in relationships.

You actually think that person has a relationship with anything other than his right hand or an inanimate object?

I like Clarke, but this is gonna brand her as a difficult actor. She trashed the show that gave her a career and I think she’ll pay for it.

Jason’s the one I have a problem with. What he was doing sounds MASSIVELY predatory, it reeks of calculation. If he was really trying to look out for her and make sure she wasn’t being taken advantage of, and if he was trying to maintain an air of professionalism, he wouldn’t be calling her weird pet nicknames like “sweetie”.

But, of course, I’ll probably get attacked for speaking on the valid point that it’s usually the guys trying to “protect” the young ingénues in sets that are the pervy ones, and Jason and Emilia will be made out to be heroes for speaking out against the evil tv show that saved both of them from doing Walmart commercials for the rest of their lives.

On sets, not in.

[quote]this is possibly the cutest thing I’ve ever seen. Beyond adorable!

🤮🤮🤮

[Quote] he wouldn’t be calling her weird pet nicknames like “sweetie”

What's weird about sweetie?

[Quote] and Jason and Emilia will be made out to be heroes for speaking out against the evil tv show that saved both of them from doing Walmart commercials for the rest of their lives.

It's not like Jason wasn't working before he landed GOT.

[quote] Well I believe her

Lol, what do you "believe", R73? That Clarke marched around butt-naked from her Hair & Makeup trailer all the way to the Set, without a single coat or robe on? That's hilariously silly. Who do you think she is - Lady Godiva? :). Any actor doing nudity comes to the set with a coat / robe ON. So why was Momoa barking orders at the (likely) female wardrobe stylists. He should've been barking at Clarke: "Where did you leave your "FUCKING", "GODDAMN" coat? Tell the crew where you left the coat you came in, so that they can bring it to you."

[quote] because "GoT" has been described as "a dumpster fire behind the scenes",

Who described it as a "dumpster fire"? GoT was a production of huge proportions - with a sea of main & supporting actors and extras (the pre-final Battle of the Bastards had 500 extras!) and expensive location shooting around Europe. So of course the crew would face some challenges in terms of logistics. A production of that massive scale (shoots abroad, a sea of extras) generally does. However, a "dumpster fire" is something like Liz Taylor's "Cleopatra" (which went way over-budget and had periods when the crew wasn't even [italic]paid[/italic] their salary) - now THAT is a "dumpster fire". GoT pales in comparison.

[quote] the fact that you've agreed to do a shitty job in exchange for pay or the hope of future opportunities doesn't make the suckage go away, or absolve the employer from a responsibility to provide decent working conditions. I've been on jobs where...

What are you even on about? How is Clarke's job "shitty" or “suckage”? What makes you think they didn't provide her with "decent working conditions" overall? You're projecting your own problems on the HBO set.

[quote] Because if the choice is between a bad job, a worse job, or unemployment, then people take the bad job, but that still doesn't mean I need to be grateful for the shittier aspects of being employed.

You mean a "bad job" that made Clarke a MULTI-MILLIONAIRE (despite having sub-par acting skills) and gave her (a C-level actor at best) name recognition and fame all across the PLANET? Lol, sure, how “bad”.

The irony is that Clarke seems to love to complain from a position of relative privilege. She begged her parents to send her to a ridiculously expensive boarding school (which costs ca. $50k per year!). But when her parents got her in - she suddenly declared that she “didn’t like it”.

Then she got into Drama Centre London (after being rejected from every other acting school - because she herself was “suckage”). That one school (part of the prestigious Central Saint Martins College of Arts and Design and the alma mater of Fassbender, Tom Hardy, Colin Firth) kindly offered her a place (when another student had to drop out). But what does Clarke do? She now runs to the journos to bitch about the school who offered her a place and moans about how they “broke her down” (because she was not the “favourite” so she was offered less glamorous, cameo roles). It doesn’t seem to occur to Clarke that she wasn’t getting lead roles in student productions not because they wanted to “break her down” - but because she simply wasn’t that good.

Clarke is one of those people who manages to somehow complain about literally every golden opportunity that fell into her lap by pure luck ($50k-per-year school; place at a central London acting school (even though she wasn’t good enough and failed auditions); TV show that made her a famous multi-millionaire).

There's only two nude scenes that involved Mamoa. The wedding night scene and another in an interior tent.

Much ado...

She's rich. She got a golden opportunity and it rewarded her finely. Her career will never reach those heights again. Getting naked was her great talent.

R46 he fucked Rose McGowan on the Conan set.

I hate when actresses try to play the victim. You read the script and knew what it entailed. Now the show is done she'll happily shit on it after making millions.

R81 did Rose say that or.....?

She's trying to make headlines because her movie flopped.

That's not exactly true r8 the first Daenerys was replaced after they saw the pilot.

They replaced at least one other actor as well and rewrote the entire pilot.

Well r79 you can feel vindicated because life made sure to humble Emilia by giving her two brain aneurysms for which she underwent brain surgery while working on GOT.

That'll teach the little bitch eh?

r15, you are obviously a woman. He was calling her "sweetie" because he isn't actually her lover so that has no bearing on real life. She was naive and distressed on set. He was being a friend.

No r75 the two show runners/producers Weiss and Benioff are both considered shit in Hollywood at this point and no one cares about them. They showed what assholes they were in their last article about the show. They are hated by most of the fan base. The series is over, if there is any time to speak out, it's now.

By season three Emilia had declared she would do no more nudity, there were articles written about it. She did end up doing nudity again but I would bet they had to pay her a lot more to get it into the script.

R86 She still hasn't learned.

Stop using illness as an excuse for a fake personality.

R83, my coworker was getting her eyebrows done at Anastasia Beverly Hills, and Rose was next to her. She was talking to the aesthetician about it. The way it sounded was that they had one of those on-set only hookups and Rose had caught feelings, but Momoa will never leave his wife and kids.

[quote]if the guy is "hot" then suddenly the puritanical mask melts right away

Isn't this how so many murderers have been acquitted on Datalounge?

R79, you are WAY too exercised about all this. Go outside and get some air.

[quote] he wouldn’t be calling her weird pet nicknames like “sweetie”

[quote] What's weird about sweetie?

I don't really care about this fight, but I do have to say that the only MEN who use the word "sweetie," are creepy straight guys, or bitchy gay guys.

So Jason must be one or the other.

[Quote] the only MEN who use the word "sweetie," are creepy straight guys, or bitchy gay guys. So Jason must be one or the other.

I'm not "exercised", R92 - no need to project your own feelings on me. I was analytical, not emotional - there's a difference.

Keep telling yourself that, R95. There's spittle of outrage at Clarke's life and actions all over your post. She really pisses you off for some reason, but whatever. If you want to stroke out over an actress you don't know, knock yourself out.

Now I get it, R79! Clarke dated that guy at school you’d always wanted for yourself, and you’ve never forgiven her. How else to explain the fixation you have for her that makes you gush on with your vitriol. Sad.

How do you guys watch anything he's in? He's too fucking sexay hot for us to pay any attention to whatever stupid story line Hollywood is trying to feed us. C'mon....he is "He-Man Central". Even straight dudes prostrate themselves at his raw masculinity. He should just do nudes because no one is not thinking about what he looks like naked. And he's a hippy dippy bi boy so he would totally do it if we asked him nicely.

Jason was so much hotter, when he looked like a twink.

No he didn't, R99. Sure, he was a hot twink, but he's MUCH hotter as a grown man! Oooh, he radiates testosterone and masculinity and pure raw sex, at least on film. It can't be real, or he'd never get out of bed to act, but damn he's something to watch in the movies.