Is most of Gen Z uncut?

Uncut unvaxxed and unwashed

I hope they bring back bush too. Nice piece OP. R1 One of those three are not like the others.

Well Mary, if you read it on Datalounge then it must be so!

I hope so! End the mutilation of males now!

Stanksleeve is disgusting.

They have measles dick and when they cum vape juice squirts out

Foreskin feels fucking awesome.

That's a beautiful cock OP!

I don’t mind uncut. I mind all those veins.

Yes OP, circumcisions have fallen out of favor in the US.

R10 that's a good thing!

Not so much, fall out of favor, per se; you have to pay for it out of pocket. Before. It was included in the delivery expenses.

dick mutilation was always a scam sold to middle class americans by religious nut jobs who wanted to "cure" masturbation in horny teenagers by removing sensitive foreskin (which obviates the need for lube)

I'm uncut and couldn't be happier!

[quote]I'm uncut and I am miserable

Fixed it for you.

R15 I haven't seen your "fixed it for you" annoyances as of late. I suppose I ought to say something nice, as in good to see you're still alive...

Yeah most are uncut.

Depends on where in the U.S. If they're from an urban area in the Western US they're more likely to be uncut. But if they're from some rural town in the Midwest they're still likely cut.

The word is INTACT, or perhaps natural...but not 'uncut.' We're not "un" anything, almost implying that cut is the normal, natural state of the penis. It's not. And intact, natural penis is the normal state of the penis.

I'm with you on the language R19.

I find that I don't much care.

R16 and R19 have not only been triggered, they have stated their boundaries.

Social justice warrior queens are so tiresome.

Some guys are so defensive about being UNCUT.

See the article below. According to the WP, circumcisions rate in the states is somewhere between 76 and 92 percent, and I say thank you sweet baby Jesus.

Meh they are fetuses to me, too young. I've seen a couple on Grindr and I am definitely their fathers' age which makes me feel like a lech. At least with millennials I was more like an older brother.

And some guys have a weird phobia about dicks they'll never be allowed to touch anyway.

[quote]According to these statistics, [bold]non-circumcision or genital integrity has become the normal condition among newborn boys in the United States.[/bold]

[quote]The CDC data [...]showed that the incidence of circumcision declined from 56 percent in 2006 to 32.5 percent in 2009

R24. Outdated data.

Nobody knows. They're not having much sex apparently.

R24. That data is grown men already cut...not the younger generation or those recently born which is a large intact population of males.

He appears to have the annoying kind of foreskin that doesn't retract properly (fully).

R31 However would you know, without pulling it back? Just proves how little understanding of a natural penis you have. The condition you are referring to is Phimosis, and he doesn't look as if he has that at all. Foreskins come in all lengths, some have a little, and some have a lot.

R31 no reason to assume that. That’s pretty unusual, balanitis is a fungal infection some men experience that could cause that. Easily treated for most with anti fungal cream, worst case with systemic antibiotics.

They have uncut dicks and stinky feet.

the vast majority of the WORLD is uncut you morons.

Are Thai guys uncut? They are so damn hot!

LOVE them uncut and veiny! The one in the OP's photo looks delicious. Could trim up the hair, though.

I somehow doubt Gen Z have such thick bushes like the one at OP.

My 12 yrs partner and I are both cut but I think I could deal with a clean uncut cock. We live in the south where circumcision is still prevalent. I've read that most parents opt for it if insurance or medicaid will pay for it as stated somewhere upthread.

That's a delicious looking cock.

With that much pubic hair who can even tell if they are cut?

Foreskin is disgusting and unhygenic. You could have it blessed by the pope, I still wouldn't put it in my mouth.

R42 It's divine if the guy has good hygiene habits. Two of my exes are uncut and there were never, ever any cleanliness issues. Just hot times and lots of good memories.

All these "foreskin is gross' people are provencial morons who have never left the USA.

pity the mutilated ones, they don't know what they're missing

I love that the DL foreskin-phobes now get to watch their nation being overrun by a tidal wave of stanksleeve. I'm guessing that younger generations will be less uptight about unmutilated cocks.

Uncut = unclean.

hard pass

I was a former foreskin-phobe queen who has seen the light and now I much prefer foreskin over circumcised.

R47 Circumcised dicks aren't clean if you don't wash them as well. I'm not sure why some here act like uncut guys have a disease. I bet you come from a flyover area.

Met some Brit men whose parents neglected them when they were young, they grew up with rotten uncut cocks which required circumcision. Yes, uncut cocks do need some level of parenting, so lazy parents just opt for penile mutilation of their sons.

I'm convinced that there's a link between circumcision and brain/nerve damage judging by all the craziness I see throughout America and in the 3rd world.

If you are pro uncut why the concern about bush? I thought you like natural.

Hopefully the ones that have a lot are bred out of existence in the future.

what do you mean uncut dicks need 'parenting'? what do they have to do exactly?

Funny that circ is a jew practice yet many racist shrews appropriated it, and an unclean guy will still have a cheesy dick regardless if he's circumcised or not. And the queens here claim to be intellectuals yet are super close minded.

No, most Americans are still cut. I know because my nephew told me his football team regularly made fun of two "turtleneck" kids in their team and one of them went and got cut and had to wear a bandage for two weeks.

I don’t know if this is exclusive to women, but sexual intercourse feels different with an intact, fully erect penis, than with a circumcised penis, which was a huge surprise to me, being that before that experience, I didn’t know what uncircumcised felt like.

An uncircumcised penis feels warmer, and it glides in and out in a way that makes one’s vagina experience a higher or heightened degree of sensitivity than with a circumcised penis. It’s a real and notable difference, and once you experience it, it’s hard to let go of.

I wish I could have gotten sole custody of my ex-husband’s penis when we divorced. I knew better than to marry that idiot, but it was cheaper than moving to Europe in order to find another one, or another, I dunno, 50 of them? Throughout a lifetime, of course.

R50 That is a myth perpetuated by American doctors who know nothing about the natural penis. The foreskin is part of, or attached to the glans (head) sometimes until puberty. This process is best left to nature. Forcibly retracting an infant or young lad's foreskin can create serious injury and scar tissue.

Parents do not retract intact boys foreskins to wash their glans. The education of so many American posters is seriously lacking.

R51 The studies support your theory. Early infant trauma, like the circ changes the way the brain formats, and is also linked to lower pain thresholds in adult males. The neurological studies show all sorts of effects on the undeveloped infant's brain.

ugh stop saying "glans"

R36. Yes, Thai men are intact as is nearly all of Asia.

R60 That is the anatomical term. You sound like an uneducated moron.

Mutilated old queens come out bitching here as the majority of the world disagrees with them. Only Muslim, Jewish pricks do. What a bunch of extremists.

R55 some years back there was a feud going on the neo-Nazi site Storm Front where a moderator said parents should not circumcise their sons because it's a Jewish practice.

Of course many parents did and it resulted in a delicious war between those opposed and those in favour.

The Nazis could pick out the Jews by checking their dicks

Aren’t they all shaved also? Ugh.

Americans will never accept uncut, and Europeans will never accept cut. Funny how Americans have refused to budge even with the many anti-circ campaigns they've tried out. In Mexico, only the upper classes and upper-middle classes circumcise their sons to distinguish them from the masses. If you're cut, people know you were born well off.

But the World Health Organisation has officially supported circumcision as a way to control all STI, not just HIV, and that says something.

The Jews know what’s best.

There needs to be a whole hygiene industry created around uncircumsized males. If we can have urinal leakage and menstruation commercials, we can have foreskin commercials.

Nothing says uncleanliness like a Moyle biting off a baby jews 4skin

I'm not a Jew so if Moyle is spelled wrong, blame it on being a WASP

ok, looked it up it's Mohel

Uncut in the US has poor, "hillbilly" connotations.

We can only hope, r67

R75, Good, more for you, no thanks, I’m not a pedophile.

And I don’t like flossing with unruly pubic hair, r76

Not sure his grooming relates to pedophilia. We expect men to have haircuts, shave their faces or trim their beards.

Personally I don’t want to sleep with ZZTop

What would r75 r77 have done in 1975-77? Not had sex?

Actually, r78 you ate correct. I was not alive so did not have sex between 1975 and 1977

r78 he probably has never thought about it.

I’ve been with cut and uncut guys. I can’t feel a difference. Both have been equally pleasurable to me.

Further prissitude noted, r79.

A much larger percentage are intact.

Twinks are experiencing a hygiene crisis these days.

Percentage of boys circumcised has only fallen ten percent in the past 40 years. The vast majority of men in this country are still circumcised and will continue to be.

You tried it though, anti-circ trolls.

R85 has never left his hometown. The VAST MAJORITY of the WORLD’S men are uncut.

Jews. Are up less than 1% of the world population. And the others who are cut outside of America are Muslims.

That leaves 70-80% or more of human makes uncut.

Get out more morons.

R66 a bit of an urban myth. Starting with the racial purity laws, every german family had to trace its genealogy twelve generations. This became evidence of jewish-free blood. There was quite a bit of trading in false genealogies to try to evade these laws, but the government also seized temple membership rolls to identify who was jewish.

The genealogy tables were used to incarcerate Christians as well, whose families had converted, often generations in the past. This was much more than a short-arm inspection.

I doubt he's having sex in 2019 R78.

The vast majority in AMERICA you fucking dipshit.

But you’re still trying it, psycho. Take your meds.

I don't like getting a mouthful of cheese. I'll take a cut cock any day.

Anesthetically, cut cocks are just more pleasing to look at and they are better for hygiene and safety. They are fine in Europe. In America, cocks should be cut. I have never heard one circumcized man, myself included, complain that he was missing something by being circumcized.

IntactAmerica.org

Intaction.org

SaveOurSons.org

R91 I think you meant "aesthetically"

"Anesthetically, cut cocks are just more pleasing to look at and they are better for hygiene and safety. They are fine in Europe. In America, cocks should be cut. I have never heard one circumcized man, myself included, complain that he was missing something by being circumcized."

I do and I have met plenty of circumcized men who wish they weren't. Uncut cocks are much hotter and likle you ass, you can keep it clean at all times.

R93, I think he meant analsthetically.

Not going to waste my FFs on the uncunts today.

Not going to waste my FFs on the uncunts today.

Not going to waste my FFs on the uncunts today.

Not going to waste my FFs on the uncunts today.

Not going to waste my FFs on the uncunts today.

Not going to waste my FFs on the uncunts today.

Not going to waste my FFs on the uncunts today.

Not going to waste my FFs on the uncunts today.

Pretty sure I was uncut

Look, American parents don’t want their son to be the one that gets teased at gym, so they’ll continue doing it. Gay men, unfortunately, don’t give birth to children so their opinion is irrelevant.

What are you talking about R98?

At no point in my life did a bunch of guys stare and point at my cock because it’s uncut. That’s bizarre frau nonsense. Boys do not stare at each other’s dicks. This is absurd.

Whatever you think you know about boys, you know a lot less than you realize.

Uncut dicks are an immediate buzzkill for me....gross.

Where I was raised, uncut guys were considered white trash, even if they weren't. Uncut was very low-class and "backwoods."

[quote]Boys do not stare at each other’s dicks. This is absurd.

"Absurd"? Do you know where you are typing?

When I was a kid, and I would see the occasional uncut cock, I had no idea what had happened to that poor boy that made his cock look like that. For years, I was nicer to this one kid in my neighborhood than I might have been otherwise because his dick was broken. Years later, I would find out about uncuttitude.

Yeah. We don't stare.

Shoo, fraus, shoo!!

[quote] I have never heard one circumcized man, myself included, complain that he was missing something by being circumcized.

Are you really that stupid?

Someone cut at birth has NO IDEA what it would be like to be uncut.

It’s the equivalent of someone who can only see in black and white saying “I don’t need to see in color” I’m. Not missing anything.“

And how provincial to only care about America.

[quote]Someone cut at birth has NO IDEA what it would be like to be uncut.

Well, we can see it. We can smell it. We can taste it (assuming we're daring enough to get that close).

I don't know why you "cut" freaks think that all uncut cock smell, they don't!

I don't care either way just stop shaving your pubes.

We all saw that video the other night, r106. He pissed right through his smegmatron. Didn't even think about sliding it up, using that lovely natural lube.

[quote] Well, we can see it. We can smell it. We can taste it (assuming we're daring enough to get that close).

Ok. I guess you really are that stupid.

None of those things can help you understand what it might FEEL LIKE to have 70-90% more nerve endings in your penis

[quote]Ok. I guess you really are that stupid.

No. You just fail to accept that we don't want what you've got (or wish you had, in many of these cases).

R110 you are a moron and your reply did not address my comment.

It’s purely scientific but apparently that is over your “limited” experience

R107 can we just agree all guys whether circumcised or not should do some grooming?

Honestly it sounds like people prefer an unwashed foreskin and giant bush with four inch ball hairs on here.

No, R111, you're the moron. He made his point and you don't like it so you're throwing a hissy fit.

/sigh. Asked and answered. Try a new line of questioning.

Well, considering I'm circumcised and I've never felt like I've had to stick my cock in a vacuum cleaner hose in order to get it off, and my sexual encounters are absolutely 100% satisfying for me, I'll take whatever imagined minuscule amount of decreased sensitivity over disgusting stanksleeve any day.

[quote] Well, considering I'm circumcised and I've never felt like I've had to stick my cock in a vacuum cleaner hose in order to get it off, and my sexual encounters are absolutely 100% satisfying for me, I'll take whatever imagined minuscule amount of decreased sensitivity over disgusting stanksleeve any day.

I guess knowing 70-90% of your nerve endings have been removed doesn’t matter to you.

Again, if you s only experienced life with ~25% of the capacity for pleasure in your penis, BY DEFINITION you don’t know what the full 100% would be like. Like someone who has never seen in color could never understand what it would be like to see in color and by definition doesn’t know what he’s missing.

If you’re happy with that fine. But not understanding the science and physiology of the penis and not being able to understand simple concepts of logic (you can’t miss what you never had) make you look extremely stupid.

Fuck off, Thorndick.

Fucking fabulous foreskin

Don't fucking mutilate the foreskin. Intact, the way a cock should be.

Haha Barbara Thorndyke owned cuntbag R117

Circumcision is disgusting.

R118 Scrumptious!

R118 Damn that is so hot

R118. We have a Winner!!

Circumcision is dangerous. i was circumcised before I left the hospital at birth and I couldn't walk for a year.

Vomit.

Circumcision closely correlates to a larger likelihood of Maiden Auntie Brigadeness later on in life.

[quote] I guess knowing 70-90% of your nerve endings have been removed doesn’t matter to you. Again, if you s only experienced life with ~25% of the capacity for pleasure in your penis, BY DEFINITION you don’t know what the full 100% would be like. Like someone who has never seen in color could never understand what it would be like to see in color and by definition doesn’t know what he’s missing. If you’re happy with that fine. But not understanding the science and physiology of the penis and not being able to understand simple concepts of logic (you can’t miss what you never had) make you look extremely stupid.

So not only are you going to tell us all now so you don't have to tell us later that we're wrong for finding foreskin gross, but you're also going to decide that someone who tells you he has a very pleasurable sex life is wrong because YOU decree it so?

You're a dumb cunt.

It's a fucked up world where the circumcised bully the uncircumcised for having regular dicks.

R127 Because the circumcised queens harass and are judgemental against the guys who have natural dicks as if they have some illness. Uncut guys are forced to defend themselves because of the prissy attitudes a lot of you lot possess.

[quote]Mutilated old queens come out bitching here as the majority of the world disagrees with them. Only Muslim, Jewish pricks do. What a bunch of extremists.

Desert sky gods do not approve of boys enjoying playing with their dicks

[quote]I have never heard one circumcized man, myself included, complain that he was missing something by being circumcized."

pretty moronic comment, how could someone "miss" a pleasure they've never experienced?

R129, you sound like the trannys who tell lesbians that if they don't want to fuck a chick with a dick that they're transphobic.

No one gives a good goddamn if you have foreskin. We just don't have any attraction or desire to deal with it sexually. We all have our preferences and you can't get butthurt because someone doesn't want to handle your stanksleeve.

[quote]Someone cut at birth has NO IDEA what it would be like to be uncut.

I was circumcised as a teen (by choice) and know the difference. Negligible when it comes to sex. And yes, I can smell un uncut man on the train if he doesn't shower for a day. Disgusting.

Dick Fill-A is repugnant. I guarantee if the circ fetishists watched an actual circumcision they would be horrified and open their closed minds. They're fond of likening it to something as innocuous as clipping nails.

Not if they're Jewish or Muslim.

A relative has young boys and was wise to have them circumcised.

I'll state facts again: Uncircumcised men have much higher rates of STIs, including HIV/AIDS, who directly contributed to that crisis which originated in Africa, where circumcision is unknown. Male circumcision in Africa is part of successfully combatting the STI problem there, while "female circumcision," which is mutilation, a crime and also contributed to the HIV/AIDS crisis, is being combatted.

There are other aspects, which are entirely personal preference. I've never had an uncut dick that tasted as good as cut dick. Anybody should know the differences in flavor and texture immediately. People, especially men, want what they don't know or haven't had, so that's why uncut men are popular with a certain generation of American men.

So many nellie prisspots on here hissing about uncut cocks. As if anyone wants to have sex with a hissing mound of cellulite like them. Have a seat, Chlamydia Sue.

[quote]you can't get butthurt because someone doesn't want to handle your stanksleeve.

Dickhurt, OTOH...

R135. The studies done in Africa were greatly flawed and the results were a mistaken jump to conclusion. The risk of an intact man contracting HIV is only raised a very tiny amount (not the 60 percent that was originally reported, which was a wrongly reported and flawed in the study)--and that is only if he has sex with a WOMAN who is HIV-positive. There is no difference in the rate of contracting HIV when an intact man has sex with another intact or cut man. Circumcision prevents nothing. The flawed African studies are even more meaningless in the US and the rest of the developed world since the vast amount of those acquiring HIV are still men having sex with other men and those abusing drug use via dirty needles.

If your STD argument were true to the point that mass cutting were necessary, then intact Europe, Asia and South America would show a much higher of STDs than the cut U.S. However, the U.S. has a much higher rate of STDs than intact populations all over the world.

[quote]The word is INTACT, or perhaps natural...but not 'uncut.' We're not "un" anything

I think of you as the uncunts.

Pubes and forskin are totally gross. Guys should all be cut and have shaved pubes.

Wasn't this thread supposed to be about us?

R136 is right. Some of these whining bitches should be so lucky to get any good cock at all!

R132 Are you SERIOUSLY comparing uncircumcised men to transsexuals? I think your circumcision has caused nerve damage.

[quote] . We just don't have any attraction or desire to deal with it sexually.

Who is this universal we? Speak for yourself, cunt!

LOL r138 "flawed studies" because he doesn't like the findings. Those studies are now saving lives in Africa and with the adoption of circumcision in previously non-practicing communities, resulted in a sharp decline in HIV/AIDS rates. This is just fact. Africa is no longer at peril of being decimated by that virus as assumed as recently as 10-20 years ago.

Best decision ever by WHO

[quote] [R132] Are you SERIOUSLY comparing uncircumcised men to transsexuals? I think your circumcision has caused nerve damage.

Wow, you're really stupid. Like amazingly stupid.

HIV/AIDS prevalence in Africa. Southern Africa has the lowest rates of circumcison and rates increase progressively as you go further North and West. This is undeniable.

R134, I've watched many circumcision surgeries, including a video of an uncut adult who was glad to be rid of his foreskin. Didn't bother me. I've seen many surgical procedures. Cells from excised foreskins are used for beneficial purposes. Obviously, you've never seen what happened to the millions of uncut men who were prisoners of war, kidnap victims, etc., disallowed proper hygiene.

Of course I've dated and had sex with uncut men, including a celebrity. He's one of the nicest guys I've known; I'd sleep with him anytime.

None of the above changes the facts about uncut dicks and the published data on STIs, all other associated risks, and the nuts who crusade against circumcision calling it mutilation, which it's not. It's a parent's right to make the decision to have his or her male child cut, as are all other decisions regarding his or her child, that's the law, that's not going to change, get over it.

Societies where circumcision is discouraged know they're perpetuating documented risks, but prefer that to personal choice. Few men not cut in infancy do it as adults unless it's a medical necessity. Full phimosis is a often a medical emergency.

I'm not part of the crowd vehemently opposed to involvement with uncut men, so don't vilify me. People like R136 are the Negative Nancies.

R135

R147 You made a false equivalence comparing guys who have natural dicks to people who have undergone surgery. And it's far more than a preference when you act like uncircumcised men are diseased.

Africa's HIV rates are going down due to better education, use of condoms and public awareness of the disease and how to prevent it. Cutting men's dicks is doing nothing.

[quote] [R147] You made a false equivalence comparing guys who have natural dicks to people who have undergone surgery. And it's far more than a preference when you act like uncircumcised men are diseased.

No I didn't, you stupid fucking moron. I equated the screaming mimis around here who are vilifying people because they don't find uncut cocks appealing to those who say gay people are transphobic if they don't want to sleep with trannys.

I'll say it again. You're a fucking moron.

R148 Is a correlation = causation error. The American AIDS epidemic wiped out a lot of folks who were circumcised back in the 80s and 90s.

I was born in a Catholic hospital and was not circumcised at birth. But then, at age four, I had cancer and kidney failure and went into the hospital for several weeks. I was discharged on my fifth birthday sans foreskin and had no idea why this mutilation had happened to me. The medical staff had convinced my mother that I would be taunted in school for having a hood if other kids were to see it in gym class.

Absurd. The only boys really looking at other boys' junk were the gay ones, and they weren't about to blow their own cover. Not in a conservative state in the '80s.

They more or less botched my circumcision and scarred my cock with notches and discoloration. I resent it to this day. Before that happened, it was perfect.

I like uncut cocks and would prefer to have been left alone.

R152's circumcision has unfortunately led to a few screws loose. Poor thing.

R149. The overwhelming majority of European, Asia and South American men are intact. The European, Asian and South American HIV and STD rates are significantly lower than they are in the majority cut U.S. Circumcision is not helping the U.S. lower its rates at all because it doesn't cure anything and it's unnecessary. And parents do not have the knowledge or the right to cut perfectly healthy tissues from a boy's genitals. His Body His Choice when he's an adult. And by the time he's an adult, he would not agree to barbaric surgery on his penis for no reason. And if there were to be a medical reason, which is relatively uncommon, then you treat the individual for a specific problem just as you would for any medical issue. There is no need for mass circumcision in infancy, boyhood or adulthood in any society and certainly not for ridiculous religious reasons and locker room illogical fucking nonsense. An intact penis is not a health hazard. Instead, an intact penis is a healthy and pleasurable aspect of a male's body.

Regarding the word INTACT....

A healthy man is the definition of an intact man, not one with an uncircumcised penis.

R157. Intact is a reference to a male's penis. The health status of a male in general is an entirely separate issue.

And now back to succulent foreskins on Gen X...or anyone else for that matter.

The level of ignorance among some of you is mind boggling. I am American and I am circumcised, but I lived in Europe for 7 years and I absolutely love and prefer uncircumcised penises. They are better in every way. And they are not dirty, cheesy, or any other ignorant thing you fools keep writing. How stupid can you be? You're showing us all with these ridiculous comments.

Here are a few for you:

R160. The voice of reason and wisdom.

He seems to like it.

R149 Quite frankly, you sound like a Circ Fetishist. You're gross.

The Holy Trinity

R44 I agree with you but didn't know Americans were using the word: "provincial". You guys really love French words. I mean: touché, cliché, cul-de-sac, a la, bon appétit, boutique, déjà vu, en route, etc and i see more and more Americans using "Femme" on social medias which french people don't really like. Femme is a strongest word than woman. Anyways, you guys should also take a look on the "Uncut" French guys. Unlike what i'm reading here they have a good hygiene. The world didn't started and won't end in America!!!!

r161, are they Warwick Rowers? I love them.

R166 They are even often using "Homme"

R166, not R44 here, but Viva le prépuce!

R167. They are not the Warwick boys, but they do kind of have the same hot, sexy vibe.

Phimosis is rarely a surgical emergency; paraphimosis is.

Is anyone here a Gen Z?

If you are, are you cut?

Or are you uncut?

Yes, to echo R171, usually a steroid cream, and stretching "exercises"shall suffice. If this isn't sufficient, sometimes an antifungal cream is added to the mix. There also exist limited surgical interventions which can be tried, when necessary, rather than resorting to circumcision first.

I'd just be worried a slip of the knife would cut by kid's dick off. It's not something that's going to grow back.

Leave it alone. They can get circumsized as an adult if they want to.

[quote]Phimosis is rarely a surgical emergency

It's definitely a bedroom emergency.

It's okay to suck the peel R175, no emergency.

Everyone sane admits that circumcision is an unnecessary procedure with a few exceptions. In the US most men have been cut, and when they have a male child want their sons to look like them. I couldn't subject a baby to this and would let him decide once he was old enough to make the decision In a first world country hygiene is not an issue. If someone's uncut penis stinks, I can guarantee their pits and crack do too because they have poor personal hygiene. I can't imagine rejecting someone based on circumcision status in the 21st century.

No.

If this thread is evidence, Gay World War III will be fought over one flap of penile skin. Declare neutrality or choose your side now!

R174, a penis can't be accidentally amputated during circumcision on an infant or an adult. Specialized instruments are used so as to prevent that by surgeons and in Jewish rites, which are different. I don't know what Muslims use.

No, R177, they are not unnecessary procedures. There's a physiological reason for a higher rate of STIs among uncut men. If you don't understand, ask a urologist. I'm not criticizing or insulting uncut men; everyone's entitled to an opinion. There are related facts. If STIs including HIV didn't exist, I might have a different opinion, but there are also other concerns. I'm not current on penile cancer rates. Circumcision should remain a parent's choice, but it was emphasized by hospitals in previous American generations as a long-term health matter, which is correct. Just because people are born in a certain configuration doesn't mean that's the best or optimum configuration. Mother Nature makes mistakes. I don't pretend or claim to know the optimum configuration. I could give examples of oddities in human biology and physiology, but this isn't the proper forum.

I've never rejected a date or proposition from a man because he's uncut and I had an uncut boyfriend who's a wonderful man. I was his 1st and he wasn't out, so no additional explanation necessary. The problem is this forum has too many narrow-minded, judgmental, bitchy queens. If I'm narrow-minded and judgmental, obviously my answer to all of the men above would've been "No".

R160 It should NEVER be the parent's choice but rather the choice of the man who owns the penis.

I know of a baby whose penis was chopped off by a mohel. The pediatric urologists tried to reattach it, but it didn’t work. It just necrosed and fell off after the surgery.

R39 captured it. Ripping the foreskin off your child adds more money to the hospital bill. Follow the $$$

It's like getting the gold package on your car. All it does is add to the profit.

R180 You're a stupid cunt; you're wrong on all counts, and you're not fooling anyone. You try to fearmonger that the foreskin is some ticking time bomb, ready to go off at any minute, and threaten the baby's survival into adulthood... long-term health issue my arse. You really need to get some help.

As already stated the US has the highest circumstances rate and the highest rate of STIs

I like both circ and uncirc dicks. It's never about the foreskin or the lack thereof for me but about the cock. But I'm intact and I'm so glad I don't have to look for lube whenever and wherever I want to jack off. Your cock like any other part of your body was not meant to get apart of it chopped off when you were born. Period.

From link at r114: The analysis sample consisted of 1059 uncircumcised and 310 circumcised men. For the glans penis, circumcised men reported decreased sexual pleasure and lower orgasm intensity. They also stated more effort was required to achieve orgasm, and a higher percentage of them experienced unusual sensations (burning, prickling, itching, or tingling and numbness of the glans penis). For the penile shaft a higher percentage of circumcised men described discomfort and pain, numbness and unusual sensations. In comparison to men circumcised before puberty, men circumcised during adolescence or later indicated less sexual pleasure at the glans penis, and a higher percentage of them reported discomfort or pain and unusual sensations at the penile shaft.

To say that you only like surgically altered penises is like saying you only like surgically altered noses. What a ridiculous concept.

You need to have a foreskin to eat at the Mortimer Club.

Just ask Murray G!

The comments of some of the mutilationists in this are absolutely sickening. Shame on all of you for advocating the deliberate mutilation of the most sensitive part of a boy/man's body.

All children, regardless of sex, have a natural human right to a whole and intact body.

Adult men can make their own decision.

Religious people can substitute a spiritual ceremony for the act of mutilation.

Those of you who have had your foreskins removed without your consent should consider restoration. No, you cannot get it all back, but you can regain quite a lot of the sensitivity that you lost and you can gain a more natural look.

See the foreskin restoration subreddit at the link below. I recommend Andre's Method, you can find info about it in the wiki link in the sidebar in that sub.

There are more things that can go wrong with a surgical procedure than with a natural penis.

Probably.

R175 : That's like eating the ice cream cone and throwing the ice cream in the garbage. It's like eating the crust of a slice of apple pie and scraping the filling into the garbage. It's like eating a candy wrapper and throwing the candy in the garbage. Why??? What's the point if you can't get to the part that's fun to play with?