Harry & Meg finally show the world baby Archie - but NOT in England,

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I can just hear Phillip now. "Thank God that child didn't come out brown".

That's one huge 4 month old.

[quote]I can just hear Phillip now. "Thank God that child didn't come out brown".

Really? You think? Or is that YOUR mind?

Say what you will about the parents, little Archie is a gorgeous baby and will most likely grow up to be a striking looking man. Mixed people with ginger hair are so attractive.

Yikes...

There is something wonky about this baby's eyes.

I noticed that too, he looks a little cross-eyed. But I think that can easily be fixed.

Lady Louise Windsor had crossed eyes which were later corrected with surgery. Archie's don't look as severe, and it's not really a concern until they're 6 months old or so IIRC.

He is Harry’s doppelgänger

His mom also has a wonky eye, so it might be forever if it runs on both sides.

That's Harry's son all right. Looks stupid.

Poor kid.....the royal family keeps popping our these future bald male off spring.

He's the best PR the Sussexes have had all year.

WTF the woman couldn't do the christening like any other normal royal, I don't know. Perfectly lovely baby, no one cares two pins who the godparents are, they're forgotten the next day, wtf was her problem?

Say, when do the Cambridges leave for Pakistan? How juicy to have two royal tours close together, with lots of outfits to critique!

Babies are often cross-eyed up to 4-6 months without strabismus being to blame.

Only if they are inbred, R15.

Cambridges to Pakistan on 14 October, so after the Sussexes return, and William and Kate will attend a huge Special Event at the Aga Khan Centre in London on 2 October as a prelude.

Lor' thank God the long vac. is over!

He has Meghan's eyes and I can already tell he has Harry's personality.

He looks like a happy baby. He does look like Markle Sr and Harry, not cute. The over the top Mumsy act as a poster said upthread for sure. She is the fakest fake that ever faked. I wish they were banished to Africa for good, never to be heard from again, and take Trump with them.

In fairness, it's reasonably difficult to find an ugly baby, so this isn't a huge development. Though arguably Prince Louis is kinda odd looking.

With a name like Archie, he better be a tough kid.

The baby is NOT cute. Yikes!

He's totally cute, and looks like Harry. Babies often look cross eyed because of the wide bridge of their nose, even the Gerber baby looked a bit cross eyed.

The baby is very cute. His parents are not. I hope to never say a harsh word about that baby. But, to be honest, I once said that about Harry, and we see how that has turned out.

He doesn't have gorgeous luscious hair.

I see the stupid tinhatter Welp Troll is here, exclaiming 'yikes' like a 10 year old, and declaring the kid is a huge 4 month old, with the inference being he was born to a surrogate weeks before the due date.

The Queen, and by proxy the rest of the royals, is not just the monarch of the UK. She is the head of the Commonwealth, the formation of which she sees as her greatest accomplishment. It only stands to reason that the Sussexes would honor these countries by debuting Archie in Africa where many of the Commonwealth companies are.

He looks almost exactly like his father did as a baby. What an adorable little booger! He is big for four months.....He must have been over 8 pounds or more at birth.....unless we're counting the weeks.... as my Granny used to say " The first baby can come any time...but the rest usually take nine months..." LOLOL!

Looks like Harry. I don’t think he’s “gorgeous” or “adorable”. He’s just an average baby; there really aren’t many ugly babies.

Does not look like either parent. Are they sure he's theirs?

Looks like every other 4 month old baby. Get back to me in 10 years when he's developed a personality.

I’m not saying this is a bad thing, but there’s no denying that he’s got some facial features that suggest he’s mixed race. He does have much of Harry in him for sure though. I don’t think his eyes are as bad as Lady Louise, but it does look like he’s squinting a little. I didn’t even think babies had their full eyesight at that age, but he’s doing it. Maybe Louise’s situation is genetic via the Battenberg, Bowes Lyons, Windsor, Teck, or Glucksburg genes and Archie is the latest manifestation of it.

Will they ever be forced to do a DNA test to prove parentage of both MM and Prince Harry? The adorable baby doesn't look at all like any of the earlier pictures of "Archie." He also the lightest 25% Black baby I've ever seen.

She definitely staked her claim with the kid.

we don’t see little Archie being bounced in front of Her Majesty OR Pa Markle, but we do see him in front of thoroughly black Desmond Tutu.

Grifters gonna grift AND she’s going to build up her black cred.

Did they name him Archie because he's a redhead?

R35, Black Africans consider MM White because that's her father's race. The concept of Mixed doesn't really exist. Mother's race isn't relevant in determining that of the offspring.

[QUOTE] Does not look like either parent. Are they sure he's theirs?

Fuck off back to your tumblr blog, you tragic tinhat.

When will the press quit trying to make the public like the Sussex? The harder they try, the less they are liked. No one cares they are in Africa and when they return, if they ever do. Move on nothing to see here, kid or not.

R37 is spot on. In tribal societies, the child derives its identity and social status from the father.

I thought the opposite, that there were a lot of things that were matriarchal in tribal cultures like passing of wealth and status. I believe some American Native tribal cultures had that, and it existed in South India and still exists I believe in one of the tiny Himalayan counties the name escapes me.

[QUOTE] Will they ever be forced to do a DNA test to prove parentage of both MM and Prince Harry? The adorable baby doesn't look at all like any of the earlier pictures of "Archie." He also the lightest 25% Black baby I've ever...

He looks exactly like he did at the Christening, which is the only other time we've seen his full face.

R41 In tribal societies in Asia and Africa, the child's status is derived from the father. The mother is irrelevant.

[quote] He also the lightest 25% Black baby I've ever seen.

He's probably not quite 25% black. Otherwise, I can assure you that you have seen lighter 25% black babies you just didn't realize it because the parents are not celebrities.

Doria is mixed race so Archie is only 12.5% black. He is very cute.

He is cute,but that baby does look like he has a touch of albino in him.It'll be interesting to see what he looks like in a few years.

Ugly kid.

He definitely looks like Harry as a baby.

[quote] He looks almost exactly like his father did as a baby. What an adorable little booger

It’s “little bugger”

A booger is in your nose

What happened to the Tiara Troll?

Has anybody see or heard from it lately?

Cuter looking and possibly even whiter than Prince Louis.

What a cuddly little cutie-pie! He looks like a frickin’ adorable ginger to me.

Oh cute. He's gonna grow up to be a big guy.

No R4, that's just the typical chat board BS someone like you comes up with to throw out unsubstantiated accusations against another poster. And you do it because you're a lowlife.

They better fix that wonk eye, and hope that baby isn't as stupid as his father.

His socks are dirty. At 4 most are not even crawling. Is Archie a superbaby who can already walk?

He'll never be queen.

Most babies have a wonk eye that corrects itself.

Prince George is the queen.

Am I a bad person for wanting to see the baby royal penis?

Let's hope he got the black genes for that. I'm sure the Windsor line could use some giant cocks.

R60 Blocked.

The kid's cute, but you can tell already he's got that German blood.

I may be in the minority here, but I don't find Harry good-looking at all. The older brother is better looking.

Plus, Harry has no arse!

No, Harry's not good looking. Harry's fucking gorgeous.

R64 - sorry but you may need glasses. Harry has NEVER been gorgeous.

Harry’s not conventionally good looking but he’s very sexy.

Harry is neither good looking or sexy.

He's a gammon.

[quote]No [R4], that's just the typical chat board BS someone like you comes up with to throw out unsubstantiated accusations against another poster. And you do it because you're a lowlife.

No, dear - YOU came out with the vile racist comment. You're the lowlife. I hope you feel guilty.

R60 - You are sicko just like pedo Andy!

Those Windsor genes came out strong with this one, though he doesn't have the scarlet blush Harry had as a baby. He's going to look like his father but have darker coloring: dark eyes, auburn or brown hair, olive skin. He might actually grow up to be a rather striking man.

Archie won't have olive skin, he's whiter than my ass.

His crossed eyes are adorable

I love the feel of babies. They’re so squishy.

He's cute as a button

They are, aren't they, r73?

R50 oh please no

Dark babies are much lighter for the first year.

No dark babies are lighter for their first days, not first year.

Archie will always be whiter than white, even if it annoys some people.

^ Really? I didn't know that. When do they turn dark? Sounds like a Thanksgiving turkey before basting.

Imagine their relief when he came out white...

True, R77.

All the Kardash kids started out pure white with ppl questioning their paternity, but by the time they were two they were much darker. Archie will have a Mediterranean look to him. Tall and broad like Harry, with large dark eyes and golden skin, and a cute nose.

A baby can turn darker just few hours after the birth. No black baby is born white.

R72 made me die laughing.

I think Harry was very fuckable for a few years. That time is past.

Stormi Jenner at 6 months.

Why does it matter what color Archie's skin is?

It doesn't matter but Meghan's Sugars and the racist Haters wanted him to look black. They must be very disappointed.

I be concev'ed on a broke ass sofa on da front porch of a cabin on a southern plantation but muh white daddy had some good swimmers.

The product of vulgar loins.

Mong

Why does Meghan deny her ethnic heritage? That's racist.

R84 - Well it sure as fuck mattered to HER. You think her two white husbands were just a coinkydink?

It’s a darn good thing the Sussexes aren’t narcissistic. A narcissist might be embarrassed by a child’s eyes that appear somewhat crossed. Clearly this isn’t the case.

[quote] No, dear - YOU came out with the vile racist comment. You're the lowlife. I hope you feel guilty.

Yes TOOTS, YOU decided to assign an intention to a comment made by someone you don't even know. You're not only a lowlife, you're a mental case. I hope you feel stupid. I'm embarrassed FOR you.

I hope Doria gets to see him soon. That child needs some family.

He is white and his only black feature will be skin which tans well, like Meghan's. I'm glad he's escaped the eye bag curse.

Poor little mite. It’s funny how I feel more sorry for the little wealthy (mostly) white Earl than I do the little black impoverished nobodies at Meghan’s play-mat photo op.

Prince Louis is cuter

R95 - That play mat video was the second embarrassing moment of the tour, the first being the girls doing the African tribal number trying to get her to dance with them.

No, third embarrassing moment. The first was that absolute hair-dress catastrophe she wore to the mosque.

Nothing particularly cute about THAT baby. He looks very ordinary.

Some of you people are vile lowlife sonsacunts.

[quote] Do you blame them after all the negative publicity in the British press?

They are such victims!!!

I am giving this child a special prized piece of jewelry from my collection as a christening gift.

.....

Megan wore that head scarf but still insisted on dangling whore tendrils.

She just doesn't get it.

Megan has a beautiful smile and she seems to be always smiling.

Is it safe to straighten a baby's hair?

Baby Archie

Its eyes are crossed. ewwww

She spent months holding on to her baby bump at public appearances. Will she spend the next few years showing him off at every possible opportunity?

I’m so tired of this evil cunt. She is a hot mess causing stress for the Royals. This will end in tears.

This thread wasn't bad until all the anti-Meghan freaks showed up with their same tired retinue of "humor" and putdowns they post in every fucking Meghan thread. (You can see with the "sugars" comment above). I hope this one gets paywalled too.

Call the Crisis Clinic and find emergency housing number.

R111 wow, I didn’t think it was that serious. Yowza.

BRF 94 got paywalled, but we can carry on bitching here.

[QUOTE] Once the first kid is born, no one really cares unless the baby will be close to the throne, like Charlotte was. Harry's second kid? Yawn.

This is pretty hypocritical, coming from a poster who spazzes out 24/7 about Hugenie.

[quote]I wish they were banished to Africa for good

"But it's not about racism!"

now that Princess Bea is engaged to her Italian count you can be sure Me! is going to be getting her face into any camera she can.

If HM and the Sussexes have any sense amongst them, a short, meaningless tour (like the sudden one to Morocco over Oscar weekend last February to keep Meghan from showing up on the red carpet cradling her bump and grinning for the cameras like a hyena in heat) so that the Sussexes can gracefully skip a wedding where they are uniformly not wanted.

R116 - Do you know for a fact that Meghan was scheduled to go to the Oscars or is this just gossip. Not snarking! I really want to know as I have head this rumor before.

Wut da fuq is dat? He looks like a fooqin retard, I tell ya! I’ll still be the prettiest, bloody ale will. Plus, he’ll never be Queen, tehehe.

It would be ironic if both George and Archie end up strongly resembling their maternal grandfathers.

Well, not everyone can have the beautiful children like I have had.

Hey Markle...have you heard the new:

news

It was widely rumoured that Meghan had been "invited" to attend the Oscars, no one knows for a fact, but the Morocco trip, barely three days in length, was very suddenly announced very quickly, allegedly a "sudden request" by the F.O., and JUST at that weekend, despite the fact that no particular diplomatic event was taking place in Morocco at the time - and Meghan was heavily pregnant. It was a very dull tour, much like the current one, a few visits to places like girls' schools, one very lavish dinner reception for the King (at which Meghan wore a caped Dior dress rumoured to cost a fortune), as well as a Carolina Herrera to another event that cost about $5,500.

Has anyone seen a "The Duke and Duchess of Sussex wish Princess Beatrice and Edo Mazzoli every happiness upon their engagement" on the Sussex IG account? I can't seem to access it.

"Megan has a beautiful smile and she seems to be always smiling."

Cat meets canary.

R101 - Alas, dear Pss. Michael, due to the clear domination of all that pasty DNA, the irony will be lost on Archie.

[quote]Has anyone seen a "The Duke and Duchess of Sussex wish Princess Beatrice and Edo Mazzoli every happiness upon their engagement" on the Sussex IG account? I can't seem to access it.

Coming soon. Bad Internet connection here in Africa.

Harry and I ordered a lot of this. Just in case.

Baby Archie is cute but WTF is going on with that left eye?

[quote]Baby Archie is cute but WTF is going on with that left eye?

He's doing that on purpose just to piss off his mother.

When I was a little kid in the Seventies it seemed like every class had a kid who had to wear a patch over their good eye in order to strengthen the lazy one. The patches were a horrible sickly shade of yellow-beige and I remember that the kids hated wearing them.

They still do that to kids nowadays? Or is there something less unpleasant that’s been developed as a treatment?

they do treatments now as an outpatient for the eyes, but i’ve definitely seen the patches. The patch companies had the good sense to make them in fun colors with cartoon characters now.

[quote]They still do that to kids nowadays? Or is there something less unpleasant that’s been developed as a treatment?

They've jazzed the patch up. I've seen ones that are brightly colored and they have an eye drawn in the middle.

Who's responsible for the lazy genes between those two? Harry with his inbred family or Megan's trashy father?

R131, they still do the patches. I know a little girl with a black bedazzled patch.

John and Cindy McCain's biracial grandson looked very white as a baby. Now, he looks mixed.

He will look like her father, karma's a bitch!

Great outfit for warm weather

r7, That is why, in the very first photo of swaddled Archie, one can discern a BANDAGE over his left eye. It is the reason, IMO, he was not shown full-faced at that time.

Though some of these comments made me LOL, I think he’s an adorable kid.

Prince Louis is so cute.

Both Louis and Archie seem to have a happy disposition.

[quote] Both Louis and Archie seem to have a happy disposition.

Poor Charlotte already has resting bitch face.

R142 Princess Charlotte probably overheard her father and Uncle Harry blaming the paparazzi for the death of her grandmother, Princess Diana, hence, Charlotte's disdain for the paparazzi.

In the clip below, when Charlotte told the paparazzi that they are not welcome, Prince William smirked and seemed to agree with her.

[quote]Princess Charlotte probably overheard her father and Uncle Harry blaming the paparazzi for the death of her grandmother, Princess Diana, hence, Charlotte's disdain for the paparazzi.

Yes, the paparazzi should be blamed for that foolish, er I mean tragic, girl's death.

R131, did you know me? The patch was followed by the National Health glasses with wire behind the ears..posh kids had better glasses and less pain iirc.

Anyway, he might have perfect eyes or a slight turn like his mother. Either way no big thing.

Oh my lord I encountered a retail employee yesterday with a wonky eye. So I thought I was focused on the “straight” eye and it turns out they were BOTH wonky and they were basically rolling around independently from each other, like a chameleon. I could not get away fast enough.

It’s not her fault, just as it’s not Archie’s, but get that issue fixed.

I don’t know how people can even see properly when their eyes roll around willy-nilly like that. How can they focus on one thing?

He just has a small strabismus, no need to act like he's blind.

A lot of babies in orphanages get strabismus because they are left in cribs in the dark and their eyes seek out a light

Get what ?

There's nuthin' wrong with my eyes. I drank carrot juice and tomato juice when I was a baby.

DL sinks to it's lowest when it bullies babies and children.

😥 Shame on you !

Neither of them know how to hold that baby. They both behave like they've met him for the first time. He doesn't look bonded to his mother at all.

Wonky eyed half caste.

Is it mongoloid?

It looks mongoloid.

[QUOTE] Is it mongoloid?

It looks mongoloid.

Hi Princess Michael!

First royal baby with Downs. Sad! x

Rhoda, you own the first disgusting pug with Downs so you can stop prating here.

FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROME

Pauline doesn’t have Downs, R156. She just inherited her mother’s looks. Don’t be bitter because you’re all sad and alone, sweetheart. x

He's not cute

Rhoda, Pauline does have Downs and Cerebral Palsy too. You should have named her Joey Deacon. You are the one all alone, sad and celibate and bitching about a baby. You only adopted your grotesque pug because everyone human hates you incontinent ass.

This couple is turning into a couple of assholes. Can't the afford someone who will counsel them? Why do they act like idiots?

omg Harry’s bald head!

Harry hung onto his hair for a decade longer than the Duke of Bald. Must rankle.

R160 types fat. x

R160 typed that whilst on the school bus.

Rhoda's ugly pug has rabies.

It looks Downsy.

Meg's eggs were too old.

That's one ugly baby.

He's not cute at all.

He doesn't look remotely like a Down's Syndrome baby, and he's no more or less cute than most babies, and I say this as someone who absolutely despises his parents.

The only think I find somewhat unusual about him is his size: he looks much bigger than I would have expected a five-month old to look; in fact, he looked much bigger than a two-day old when Meghan presented him at her carefully arranged photo op in the Great Hall at Windsor. He looked a month old to me, at least. I don't generally go for conspiracy theores, but it did seem to me that something about that birth was incredibly stage-managed to conceal something. Ditto the godparent nonsense.

He looked a month old on 4 May, and six months old in October in Africa.

Beyond that, and there's nothing to say he just isn't big, which would come with the Spencer genes, he looks a perfectly ordinary baby.

He looks like a high yellow

He's an ordinary looking baby. Not particularly cute; just ordinary. And boy it is obvious she does NOT know how to hold him. She's not maternal at all. Ir really doesn't look like she and the baby have done any bonding. Does she breast feed him? I think not. She probably considers herself too busy to do that. A nanny probably bottle feeds him. Anyway, these two don't seem like parent material to me. The way they act around the baby seems like just that; an act.

R172, considering you are a sad celibate bitch who has never had children, you're in no position to make comments about somebody's else's parenting skills. She's a small woman holding a big baby. He looks very content and never screams or tantrums when she's holding him. They're doing just fine. You should worry more about the malcontent George and why he looks so glum every time he has to do a pap walk.

I think George is just a very serious kid. He didn't even smile for the first two years.

"Considering you are a sad celibate bitch who has never had children, you're in no position to make comments about somebody's else's parenting skills."

And what makes YOU an authority on parenting, you pathetic cunt? You have no idea "how they're doing." For all you know, you poor cunt, little Archie might scream and stay awake all night. He doesn't look "content" while Mommy Dearest is holding him; he looks...dulled. Maybe she slips tranquilizers in his milk bottle. And the "malcontent" George seems a lot more normal than poor little Archie (what an idiotic name), who does seem like he has something, well, WRONG with him. With those two as parents, that's no surprise.

Poor kid. Imagine being 50 and having to tell people his name is Archie Dumbarton.

[QUOTE] Maybe she slips tranquilizers in his milk bottle.

Oh come on. Me! may be self absorbed and ridiculous but please don’t suggest she’d drug her own child. That’s Sam Markle type talk.

R173, Like father, like son, re: glum.

R176, Archie anything! He'll probably go by "Archie Harrison," though.

"And is that short for 'Archibald,' Dear?"

"No; it's short for 'My parents were morons who played at being Royal but not-Royal, so they stuck me with this Down-Market moniker that they thought is a cute play on their names, Rachel and Harry.' So! Did I pass the audition, or should I read Scene 2 again?"

[QUOTE] Maybe she slips tranquilizers in his milk bottle.

You evil, racist cunt - accusing a woman of color of drugging a 6 month year old baby. Muriel, please paywall this one too, like you did Gowns of the Brf and the Quatrieme thread. The Klan are all dancing here, pitchforks aloft, not one of them under 65.

R175 is that silly weak minded crone who links to KKK leader Danja Zone. DZ's default is to say Harry, Meghan and Archie are medicated if they seem calm and happy. If they're laughing, she says they're on cocaine.

Just another child of immense privilege who will absolutely hate his life.

And I wouldn’t blame him.

That is one beautiful baby!

What an unfortunate looking snot-factory.

R180 - “The Klan are all dancing here, pitchforks aloft.”

This is brilliant!! And so true, and the reason I love the DL.

"Never had children"

Yes, precisely, we were afraid they would turn out to be like you.

Why do Meghan's worshippers all sound as if they are naughty 12-year-olds spray-painting rude messages in public conveniences?

He looks like John Malkovich.

“The Klan are all dancing here, pitchforks aloft.”

I say, sounds like fun! Too bad 5 November is past. Shall we schedule it for Guy Fawkes 2020?

Ugly little thing. But then I find ALL human babies repulsive.

What have you done to its eyes??!!

That name is cute for a baby, but will be awkward as fuck for an adult. And SUCH creativity with the middle name.

R192, yes it’s a silly name for nobility. Trashy in fact.

R193 Even in general. If you met a random 35+ year old man and he said "I'm Archie"...that's weird. Nicknames as legal names is odd.

People announced that Meghan is 4 months pregnant with a girl. WHY IS NO ONE TALKING ABOUT THIS ON DL??????

r195 I think that's just speculation

R191 - I don't think the rest are getting the reference.

R195 - It was tabloid trash. IBI got it from New Idea which routinely makes shit up. If she were pregnant they'd have announced it as soon as the first three months were up to salvage some PR from the backlash to the lawsuit and documentary. They would look like the saviours of the BRF in the current climate. And if they knew it was going to be a girl, they wouldn't tell anyone so it could be a "surprise". They denied publicly having been informed of Archie's sex, and it then came out in one of her emails to Enninfield at VOGUE that they knew they were having a boy.

"Meghan Markle is reportedly pregnant with her second child and Queen Elizabeth II couldn’t wait to meet her newest great-granddaughter.

A source reportedly told New Idea that the Duchess of Sussex is four months pregnant. And they also claimed that Prince Harry and Markle will welcome a baby girl early next year.

An insider told the publication that Her Majesty greeted the news with the kindest words. And the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are also elated to learn that they will be second time parents because they’ve always wanted to have kids that are close in age.

“So, when Meghan learned that she was expecting just a few months after giving birth to Archie, she and Harry were ecstatic. Harry has already picked her name: it’s going to be Diana, after his late mom,” the source said."

The legendary "source" and "insider" who's so close to QEII that he knows what QEII said and ran right off to ring New Idea about it. And did an end run around the Sussexes to announce it for them! Yes, that's what really close friends of the royals do.

Never mind that HM removed the Sussex's photo from the table full of family photos where the press could pick it up

A Sussex pregnancy would make all the major news sites.

That said, I wouldn't be a bit surprised if she were in the club again. It would be a clever more, forestalling being kicked out, and nothing generates coos and nicer PR than a baby announcement.

But that some insider would leak the news and risk the wrath of the Sussexes by depriving them of the announcement themselves? Doubt it.

And as it has a one in two chance of being a girl, New Idea has a 50-50 chance of being able to shout, "See? We were right!"y

And then they'd have the BRF over a barrel again.

If she's four months pregnant it means she got pregnant when Archie was only three months old, which seems extremely unlikely. It also goes against all royal protocol to announce the sex of the baby in advance.

R200-Nothing generates nicer PR than a baby? That's usually true, but you have to admit, the Sussexes so massively fucked up everything around Archie's birth, they couldn't have botched it more had they actually been trying. Meghan's pregnancy featured non-stop nausea inducing belly cupping combined with risible attention-whoring coat flicking. Archie's birth announcement misled the press and included no hospital steps for Meghan (she felt so sorry for Kate having to do that!), no announcement of the godparents because privacy! (who are the Camb kids' godparents again? Anybody without turning to Google?), not showing the British people the baby, etc. etc. And of course, who can forget the maternity coat stunt at Euge's wedding? That baby should have gotten Meghan massive, massive amounts of sympathetic, glowing PR, and she and Harry fucked it up at each and every turn. Honestly, it's pretty astonishing.

R202 - Yes, I know. That's what Harry and Meghan specialise in: own goals. But it would still make it harder for the BRF to give them the boot and the press would be a bit more cautious, and it would help deflect attention from their most recent own goals, the whingeing about their miserable lives, the oblique insults at the BRF for not "checking in" with them to see how they are, and yet another sweetly nasty article about Kate.

It's still a good tactic. And she will be 40 soon. If she does come out with a pregnancy announcement when they "return" from their "break" - no one should be surprised.

[quote] He also the lightest 25% Black baby I've ever seen.

Then you haven't seen many. He looks like any other Brazilian kid of mixed parents I've ever seen. I had no doubt this baby would turn out like this, because if one is actually familiar with miscegenation you'd know that two generations down the babies tend to be whiter and whiter, till the point where they look full Caucasian.

DNA TV shows in Brazil used to be a dime a dozen because so many poor Brazilians of mestizo origins had very fair skinned blond babies and the ignorant fathers wouldn't believe they were theirs. That's how it works.

He looks exactly like Neymar's kid, the Brazilian footballer from Paris Saint-Germain who's as "black" as Meg and whose mother is a blonde Brazilian.

I'm 34% West African (per 23andme) and complexion wise I'm slightly paler than Tamera Mowry's kid

' Meghan's pregnancy featured non-stop nausea inducing belly cupping combined with risible attention-whoring coat flicking'

Nobody except a pack of rancid incel frauen on here gives a fuck about whether a pregnant woman holds her belly. The non incel public thought it was sweet and protective. They would only have disapproved had she been caught drinking alcohol or ski-ing or something that posed a risk to the baby. Cupping her belly was endearing, you unloved scabrous sows.

The public soon forgave her for not posing on the Linden steps after she gave an interview with Harry and Archie a few days later, and they both said more than Kate and Wills did at Linden. The public then got another much longer video of Archie in Africa, whereas Kate and Wills did not provide such access at only a few months old. They kept the kids inside so Kate could be her lazy self and not go on tours. She took a few bad pics and that was it until the kids were old enough for balcony appearances.

Absolutely nothing about that birth now troubles the British public. A second pregnancy would be a welcomed by all, including bully boy William, as a distraction from the main event of the paedo prince, but you hysterics are too blinded by hate to see that.

Archie is at least 75% white, so why is anyone surprised at how "white" he looks? It's true that "throwback" babies are possible, but given a 50% Caucasian mother and 100% Caucasian father, he looks exactly as anticipated. Meghan is light-skinned enough to be "racially ambiguous" as they say in show biz, and after straightening her hair and having a nose job, she looks even more so. And Archie is several shades paler than Meghan is, you can see that when she holds him in her arms. Unless his hair goes African as he matures, he will always look like a Caucasian with a very slight hint of non-Caucasian in his features. He looks exactly as most of us predicted he would.

I'm not sold on Doria being 100% black. She is pretty light skinned herself. Archie will have full lips, which is attractive, and skin that tans well, another boon. He'll be tall and broad like Harry. His dark or auburn hair might have a kink but if he keeps it very short nobody will notice. He'd be better off inheriting Meg's hair than the baldness genes through Harry.

This guy, James Dunmore of Made in Chelsea fame, has the same racial mix as Archie. You can see his curly hair and fuller lips. Very attractive. If Archie ends up looking like this, he'll be lucky. James has a tan in most of these photos.

Another pic of James Dunmore.

R208 - I agree with you. I am also not convinced that Doria is 100% black.

I'd hardly call Doria lightskinned, but most African Americans have some white lineage, especially if their ancestors were slaves.

I think most posters believe that Archie Mountbatten Windsor is more than 75% Caucasian .

Oh, Awwwchie!

They probably keep him slathered in SPF100 and in dim rooms at most times.

In fairness, most kids these days should be slathered in sunscreen - in Australia they call it the Slip Slop Slap Sunsafe routine: slip on sunglasses, slop on sunscreen, and slap on a hat before going out. I might have the order wrong, but you get the idea.

For all the morons obsessed with genetic make up and appearance of a kid who will never even know you exist, please reference blond "white" child of actress Paula Patton and so-called musician Robin Thicke.

Paula Patton's black? I didn't know. I also didn't know with Markle either. I am hopeless at identifying races.

Muriel - please stop this.

I agree with all the posters above - Meghan is mixed race trash. How this nappy-haired uppity part black woman was allowed to marry our Bonny Prince Harry - boggles the mind. She grew up in a black ghetto, her mother was in prison for most of Meghan's childhood, and she is poorly educated despite the fact that she supposedly graduated from Northwestern - which is hardly Oxford, is it! She is no English Rose and is foisting the mixed-race baby on us as if he could ever be a Prince of England...Her wrong doings are far worse than her teen-raping uncle in law. I am fine with Prince Andrew appearing in public - he said he is innocent. Meghan is not an innocent person - she is guilty of being a narc, merching and spending every waking moment trying to undermine the BRF. The Firm needs to send her back to the black ghetto she came from to prevent her form continuing to pollute the BRF with her merching and narcing.

Nice satire, R220

I feel so sorry for the little fellow with these two loons as parents.

I agree R222. There is little hope he will turn out better than his vapid and vacation-loving trashy York relatives, the Princesses.

They should move to Toronto and represent the Royal Family in Canada.

R224u - I suspect our Canadian cousins would have something to say about that.

R224, that’s a splendid idea. But Canada isn’t important enough for Meghan - now that’s she’s a member of the BRF.

We don't want her. We just got rid of her.