Downton Abbey's Thomas Barrow and the Future of the Gay Past
[quote]Is Thomas Barrow an accurate unveiling of historical homosexuality, or a backward projection of our current idea of what it means to be gay, an anachronism disguised as a revelation?
We've seen these anachronisms and characters being strangely prescient about the future throughout DA's run. But it's entertainment and it made me feel good, so I don't see the issue here. What do you think?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 21 | September 23, 2019 11:32 AM
|
I don't understand how Barrow said he never met anyone like him, ie gay. There have always been gay men on the dl. Oscar Wilde never had any trouble. All those aristo men who visited DA would have had plenty of m/m experience at British public schools.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | September 18, 2019 6:23 PM
|
[quote]I don't understand how Barrow said he never met anyone like him, ie gay.
Yeah, that line made me wince. Perhaps he meant someone who might not be out but is "comfortably gay", in that he doesn't mind talking about it with Thomas like it's not an affliction?
by Anonymous | reply 2 | September 18, 2019 6:34 PM
|
Particularly if the character had been in the First World War, a I believe Barrow was, surely somewhere along the way between Britain and the Western Front he would have encountered what were then called inverts. He might not have gotten to know them but certainly whatever passed for Gaydar in the early 20th century would have caught his attention.
The gay story thread in the DA movie did feel a bit like backward projection. I don't think in provincial York there would have been a clandestine gay bar as raucous and noisy as that one. Things would have been much more furtive. And I would have imagined the police being much more brutal in their crackdown when they raided the place.
And although it is not unlikely that somewhere in the Royal Household there were gay men working, it did seem strange to me that one would take such a shine to Barrow. As one of the movie's other characters commented, The Downton servants worked for a minor noble family in a second tier house far off in the provinces, so they would hardly be of great interest to Royal servants who could experience much more of the world in London and more sophisticated environs.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | September 18, 2019 7:12 PM
|
It's a tradeoff, I suppose. Yes, it's anachronistic, but it's a nice nod to the substantial gay DA following. It also sends a didactic message to the straight audiences that we've been around since before the sexual revolution, and that it was THEIR fault that we weren't able to be more open about it.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | September 18, 2019 7:25 PM
|
r4 I think that's what they were going for.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | September 18, 2019 7:39 PM
|
Did we see Thomas' John Thomas??
by Anonymous | reply 6 | September 18, 2019 9:24 PM
|
I don't think we even saw any guy shirtless. It's weirdly tame on that front, especially considering adults are the main (only?) audience for it.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | September 18, 2019 9:28 PM
|
Going back a long way, but wasn't the divine Pamuk shirtless for a few moments? And Thomas' sleazy aristo bf in the first episode?
by Anonymous | reply 8 | September 19, 2019 5:19 AM
|
Yes, I was talking about the movie...
by Anonymous | reply 9 | September 19, 2019 10:41 AM
|
Great article OP, thanks for that. I didnt have an issue with how he was played in DA. I always had a crush on him! Extremely cute actor that played him, and you cant help but feel sad for the character, being gay back then was shit
by Anonymous | reply 10 | September 19, 2019 2:02 PM
|
Didn't Robert make a comment once about all the homo sex in prep schools
by Anonymous | reply 11 | September 21, 2019 12:25 AM
|
Yes I guess it's the straight audiences' fault that gay people had to be in the closet in the pre sexual revolution.
This sounds like an incredibly annoying kind of film. Like making a movie with a female empowerment sub plot set during the revolutionary war.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | September 21, 2019 12:42 AM
|
R11, you're right, I remember that clearly, it was after Barrow got caught, he said something along the lines of "if all the boys I saw doing things like that at prep school were put away for good the Empire would have collapsed"
by Anonymous | reply 13 | September 21, 2019 2:19 AM
|
r12 You sound like a homophobe. And an angry incel as well, judging by your second paragraph. What are you even doing on DL? Get lost.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | September 21, 2019 2:28 AM
|
No you fuck off SJW fascist R14. Contemptable twisted dickhead who thinks the past must be enacted according to his/her narrow minded strait-jacketed view.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | September 21, 2019 4:09 AM
|
Did Barrow go to prep school? Did he work at one?
by Anonymous | reply 16 | September 21, 2019 4:36 AM
|
R15, you're the one with a narrow view of the past. You just have a narrow view, period.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | September 21, 2019 3:23 PM
|
Barrow was working-class and barely educated. He was a lifelong servant. I believe it was mentioned that his father was a clocksmith.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | September 21, 2019 4:19 PM
|
An orgy of Barrow, Branson, the hot king valet, Andy, Jimmy, new new footman and the plumber would be hot
by Anonymous | reply 19 | September 23, 2019 9:42 AM
|
R18 Whilst I know Barrow was from a poor family he certainly appeared to be rather well read and refined. After all he tried to teach Andy who to read and write without anything in return other than friendship. However, I put it down to despite being from a working class background Barrow was very intelligent and tried to better and educate himself. Like Tom in that respect, though Tom never actually desired to be part of the upper class Barrow would have jumped at it and done everything he could to be apart of it.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | September 23, 2019 9:52 AM
|
Sorry, it was Robert who made the comment, clearly.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | September 23, 2019 11:32 AM
|