Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

OH, DEAR GOD... "Log Cabin Republicans endorse Trump"

Y'all.... What are we going to do with these idiots?

The Log Cabin Republicans endorsed President Trump's 2020 reelection bid on Friday nearly four years after the conservative LGBT organization declined to endorse then-candidate Trump in 2016.

The group said its national board of directors voted to endorse Trump after consulting with its chapters across the country.

Log Cabin Republicans chairman Robert Kabel and vice chairwoman Jill Homan argued in a Washington Post op-ed on Friday that Trump has helped remove LGBTQ rights as a wedge issue in the GOP, citing his administration's policies on ending the spread of HIV/AIDS, as well as his push to get other countries to conform to modern human rights standards.

The leaders also cited Trump's appointment of Richard Grenell, who is openly gay, as U.S. ambassador to Germany.

While we do not agree with every policy or platform position presented by the White House or the Republican Party, we share a commitment to individual responsibility, personal freedom and a strong national defense," Kabel and Homan wrote.

The move marks a reversal after the group refused to endorse Trump in 2016, citing him surrounding himself with advisers "with a record of opposing LGBT equality," as well as his support of the First Amendment Defense Act, which would block the federal government from taking adverse action against people based on their beliefs about marriage.

The group said in 2016 that they would welcome the opportunity to work with him on LGBTQ issues.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 185February 6, 2020 7:45 PM

CBS:

Trump rule would let some businesses bar LGBT workers

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1August 16, 2019 2:08 PM

Ya know... this group has to be infested with people, who are really straight but want to prove their progressiveness, by becoming a member. This Administration has been attacking gay rights since its very first day! Now, this group endorses Trump because he appoints a gay Ambassador?

by Anonymousreply 2August 16, 2019 2:11 PM

Another GOP front/AstroTurf group

by Anonymousreply 3August 16, 2019 2:14 PM

Yeah, lots and lots and lots of straight people like to pretend to be gay.

by Anonymousreply 4August 16, 2019 2:15 PM

Who cares? Trump doesn't care for sure.

They are totally irrelevant

by Anonymousreply 5August 16, 2019 2:15 PM

Sonnder fags and sonnder dykes, every last one of them. They just endorsed Mike Pence. They just endorsed Betsy DeVos. Fucking idiot house faggot trash.

by Anonymousreply 6August 16, 2019 2:15 PM

Fuck 'em

by Anonymousreply 7August 16, 2019 2:22 PM

No, don't fuck them. They don't deserve it.

by Anonymousreply 8August 16, 2019 2:24 PM

Is Aaron Schock their leader?

by Anonymousreply 9August 16, 2019 2:24 PM

Wow. There should be an alternate label for these...things. No term I can think of is strong enough.

by Anonymousreply 10August 16, 2019 2:27 PM

“Deplorable” applies, R10. They’re just standard Deplorable trash. Lump them in with them, not us.

by Anonymousreply 11August 16, 2019 2:30 PM

[quote]Another GOP front/AstroTurf group

what does this mean?

by Anonymousreply 12August 16, 2019 2:31 PM

In fairness... I present the other side. But first, a little about this queen here;

Matthew Craffey of Los Angeles has a bachelor’s degree in political science from California Lutheran University and is Chairman of the Log Cabin Republicans of California.

Featured quote: "There is not a single thing I can’t do now in Trump’s America as a gay man that I could do in Obama’s."

And now, the piece... of shit article;

5 Biggest Misconceptions About The Trump Administration’s Record On LGBTQ Issues--If you cut through the lies and the false narratives peddled by the media, you’ll find Trump has been one of the greatest presidents for LGBTQ Americans in history.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13August 16, 2019 2:36 PM

There was an article on Reddit yesterday about some policy they are trying to push that allows government contractors and some other entities the right to fire gays on religious grounds if their religion disagrees with homosexuality. I'll have to find the article but I was fuckin floored! These are businesses that make their money through government contracts, financed by OUR taxes. Gay taxes!

by Anonymousreply 14August 16, 2019 2:37 PM

There are six gazillion people in this world. There will always be groups of contrarians and other whackos that can't think straight (pun intended) for the life of them. Ignore.

by Anonymousreply 15August 16, 2019 2:39 PM

R13: Surprise, surprise, it's published in Mr. Megan McCain's e-rag. And this house fag is REALLY not paying attention to what this administration is doing and who is in it. Like I said above, it's not just Trump, it's Pence, it's DeVos, it's nelly Cuccinelli.

R12: Astro-turf groups are fake supporters and groups, to make it look like a certain group supports an issue or candidate. As opposed to grassroots groups that genuinely represent their membership. Log Cabin are a bunch of gays who support an anti-gay political party, supposedly. Stonewall Democrats are a bunch of gays who support a pro-gay party. Those are the examples of astroturf versus grassroots right there.

by Anonymousreply 16August 16, 2019 2:42 PM

"But I [bold]WANT[/bold] them to kill me!"

by Anonymousreply 17August 16, 2019 2:42 PM

They are idiotic.

by Anonymousreply 18August 16, 2019 2:43 PM

They are irrelevant.

by Anonymousreply 19August 16, 2019 2:45 PM

Yes, disparagingly referring to gay Republicans as "house gays" (just like you lot refer to black Republicans as "uncle toms") is really going to convince them to think differently. *eyeroll* Instead, all you do is make them dig their heels in even further and turn a maybe vote for Trump into a definite vote for Trump. Just like when Hillary referred to half the country as "deplorable", it pissed them off and made them even more insistent in voting for Trump (or really anyone BUT Hillary).

Would you give money to a homeless person if they walked up to you in the street and called you an ugly stupid cunt who deserves to die? Of course not. Why do you think doing basically the same thing to voters would be any different?

by Anonymousreply 20August 16, 2019 2:49 PM

[quote]is really going to convince them to think differently

No one is trying to flip 'em. Nothing is going to make them love themselves more than they love daddy's money. We're plain 'ol mocking them.

by Anonymousreply 21August 16, 2019 2:57 PM

And making them more likely to vote AGAINST you, R21. You're not too smart are you?

by Anonymousreply 22August 16, 2019 3:01 PM

You think they'd ever vote with you? Just how smart are [italic]you?

by Anonymousreply 23August 16, 2019 3:05 PM

Some people do change their minds or at least find common ground. But not when you insult them and openly wish death on them. But you do you and we'll all enjoy Trump's second term largely thanks to your belligerence.

by Anonymousreply 24August 16, 2019 3:07 PM

Well r20, since they unapologetically refer to me as a "libtard" I have no problem with referring to them as "housegays".

by Anonymousreply 25August 16, 2019 3:10 PM

I honestly wondered if Trump's "we'll eradicate AIDS" promise was specifically meant to cater to gay rightwingers. It wouldn't surprise me, because his popularity is still low enough that he needs every tiny little group he can get to continue to support him if he wants to have a chance in 2020. His approval is at 46% at the highest but that's always just for a brief moment; it's usually more like 40% or so, and no president with such a low popularity has been reelected since Truman -- and even he probably had a higher than 40% approval rating, but no one knew because pollsters had stopped polling weeks before the election.

In short, Trump's in trouble, and his promise wasn't sincere, it was trying to get everyone to forget that he fired the entire government's HIV panel in 2017, and immediately removed the entire LGBT part of the government website when he took office, and is trying to remove orientation from the census as well.

Apparently he fooled the Log Cabinettes, but that's not hard to do.

by Anonymousreply 26August 16, 2019 3:14 PM

If I called someone a fat whore here on Datalounge and they got so hurt they decided to vote for Trump in 2020 because of it, they have a mental illness that's severe enough they probably shouldn't be allowed to vote.

by Anonymousreply 27August 16, 2019 3:16 PM

I hold certain beliefs that can be described as conservative: individual and fiscal responsibility, government programs are doomed to failure without individual initiative, a strong military, a strong and clearcut foreign policy. And Obama proved inadequate in his policy in Syria. That said...

Log Cabin Republicans are delusional. They remind me of those who advocated "separate but equal." They also remind me of the guys in classes who spoke out a great deal, but were in fact C students.

Richard Grenell is a token appointment. They forget that he was a foreign policy expert for the Romney campaign and would have gone further except for the opposition of the Christianist elements in the GOP. That milquetoast Romney caved to that pressure. Now in the Administration of this racist, sexist, irresponsible imbecile the gay guy is given a safe appointment that has no teeth at all.

Wake up Log Cabin Republicans! Guess what, they call you the F word behind your backs!

And these idiots choose to ignore this:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 28August 16, 2019 3:24 PM

R20, you’re fucking apologizing for their deplorable believes. Go fucking join them, you asshole

by Anonymousreply 29August 16, 2019 3:27 PM

The Trump administration has submitted amicus briefs to SCOTUS saying that it should be okay to fire gays just because they’re gay. Another brief supported the denial of services just because someone is gay.

His DOJ supports lawsuits that try to make marriage rights mean less benefits for gays than straights. Also he supports providers using their religious beliefs to deny medical services to gays.

I just think the Stonewall gays hate themselves for being gay

by Anonymousreply 30August 16, 2019 3:30 PM

^ sorry, Log Cabin gays

by Anonymousreply 31August 16, 2019 3:30 PM

[quote]I hold certain beliefs that can be described as conservative: individual and fiscal responsibility, government programs are doomed to failure without individual initiative, a strong military, a strong and clearcut foreign policy. And Obama proved inadequate in his policy in Syria.

Got it, R28. But, tell us... where do civil rights fit into your beliefs?

by Anonymousreply 32August 16, 2019 3:32 PM

R20, no one will convince Log Cabins what they are doing is wrong no matter what you try.

If they are stupid enough to support Trump and The GOP despite all the evidence that they despise gay and their rights, they’re already brain dead

by Anonymousreply 33August 16, 2019 3:32 PM

[quote] And Obama proved inadequate in his policy in Syria.

Still waiting for Trump to figure out exactly what his policy is.

At least Obama thought it out and was determined to use diplomacy instead of war. Trump seems to have ceded everything to Russia

by Anonymousreply 34August 16, 2019 3:34 PM

Datalounge hates Trump so much that, as R26 says, if Trump did indeed find a cure for AIDS, you cunts would refuse to take the cure and would rather die instead to somehow spite him. That's how far gone you are hatred-wise.

by Anonymousreply 35August 16, 2019 3:34 PM

R27 Except you're not just calling them a fat whore are you?

You're calling them a deplorable which according to Merriam Webster means this:

[quote]cheap, contemptible, cruddy, despicable, dirty, grubby, lame, lousy, mean, nasty, paltry, pitiable, pitiful, ratty, scabby, scummy, scurvy, sneaking, sorry, wretched

And, on top of that, you're wishing death upon them as is done so often here on Datalounge.

You're speaking of and treating them just like the Nazis spoke of and treated Jews in Germany in the early 1940s. Cute.

by Anonymousreply 36August 16, 2019 3:38 PM

Oh, go stick your victim hood attitude up your butt, R35. If Trump is hated there is good reason to hate him. I swear! I do try to understand the contra side. I really, really, do! But, I can't understand why anyone is supporting this monstrous idiot unless you're either part of the 1% and care nothing about your fellow man, or you're into this white privilege/superiority mess whether you know it or not. Trump is a disaster.

by Anonymousreply 37August 16, 2019 3:39 PM

But they are, Blanche, they are! Go suck Pence's dick in the bushes -- if you can find it

by Anonymousreply 38August 16, 2019 3:40 PM

Log Cabin Republicans are no different from any other deplorables. They are immune to facts and logic, and nothing, but nothing, is going to change their opinion of their beloved Fearless Leader. So spare us the lectures about how we're alienating potential allies.

by Anonymousreply 39August 16, 2019 3:42 PM

^This is what dumb right wing cunts always do. They justify their own hatred based on what they are SURE what the evil progressives/Obama would do.

R27, fat whore was wrong, dumb whore was the correct answer.

And Hilliary only called HALF of them deporables and it's obvious she underestimated.

by Anonymousreply 40August 16, 2019 3:46 PM

[quote]is going to change their opinion of their beloved Fearless Leader.

Who wants to change their minds? I want them dis-invited from all of the fabulous gay parties and events. Let them congregate and inject among themselves.

by Anonymousreply 41August 16, 2019 3:47 PM

A bunch of sad fags still trying to get straight daddy's approval and acceptance.

by Anonymousreply 42August 16, 2019 3:49 PM

If they came out and supported William Weld for the GOP nomination then, yeah, people would give them a pass. Anybody who *still* supports Trump is fair game for all the nasty insults.

by Anonymousreply 43August 16, 2019 3:49 PM

Not surprising. You seen the number of right-wing gays on here OP?

by Anonymousreply 44August 16, 2019 3:50 PM

Those people should be rounded up and napalmed.

by Anonymousreply 45August 16, 2019 3:51 PM

So they are nothing more that gay republicans. Punch and delete.

by Anonymousreply 46August 16, 2019 3:54 PM

Hypocritical gay Republicans voting against their own interests are certainly nothing new.

by Anonymousreply 47August 16, 2019 3:57 PM

[quote]Log Cabin Republicans are no different from any other deplorables. They are immune to facts and logic,

Yep. I was reading the Aaron Schock yesterday and poor, poor, Aaron was lamenting how "the left" weren't tolerant of opposing opinions. (SMH) WHAT? What about the offensive/oppressive legislation that is being... PASSED? Rights that are being (or attempted) taken away? That's more than an opinion.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 48August 16, 2019 3:59 PM

I think a lot of gays are going to vote for Trump, or stay home, if Warren is the nominee. I think Trump could get up to 40% of the gay vote in that matchup. She's the only Democratic candidate who would do poorly with gays.

Does anyone know how much of the gay vote Trump got against Hillary?

by Anonymousreply 49August 16, 2019 3:59 PM

Shun. Ignore. Moving on...

by Anonymousreply 50August 16, 2019 4:04 PM

R32, civil rights are front and center. They are at the core of my political beliefs. That's why I do not vote Republican, R32. Some of us are little more complex than others in our political beliefs and cannot be easily categorized.

R34, Obama made a mistake in Syria...too may red lines. While this moron may have ceded everything there to Putin's Russia, the Obama Administration should have more aggressive in their support for the liberal opposition to the Assad regime.

by Anonymousreply 51August 16, 2019 4:04 PM

When Trump got elected there were a couple of gay guys on Facebook bragging about voting for Trump, calling themselves "deplorables" and getting hateful with anyone who argued with them so fags can be stupid and selfish too sadly.

by Anonymousreply 52August 16, 2019 4:05 PM

Scorn them. Shun them. Do not socialize with them. Denounce them if you encounter them. NEVER EVER have sex with them.

They should be isolated, cut off from anything and everything outside of their Log Cabin Club bubble.

by Anonymousreply 53August 16, 2019 4:09 PM

[quote]I think a lot of gays are going to vote for Trump, or stay home, if Warren is the nominee. I think Trump could get up to 40% of the gay vote in that matchup. She's the only Democratic candidate who would do poorly with gays.

Thanks for stopping by, Dimitri.

by Anonymousreply 54August 16, 2019 4:10 PM

^Now, we're talkin'!

by Anonymousreply 55August 16, 2019 4:10 PM

I'm with you r53. You top or bottom?

by Anonymousreply 56August 16, 2019 4:24 PM

R37 loves to pretend that there aren't just as many left wing 1%ers as there are right wing. Talk about turning on the victimhood. It's all those "dirty rich Jews" that are holding you down, isn't it R37 you anti_Semetic piece of shit?

by Anonymousreply 57August 16, 2019 4:24 PM

Versatile, R56.

by Anonymousreply 58August 16, 2019 4:26 PM

R38 is another "liberal" who automatically uses homosexuality (or the accusation of such) as his go-to insult against his enemies. What does that say about you, R38? Nothing positive, you homophobic cunt.

by Anonymousreply 59August 16, 2019 4:26 PM

[quote]Those people should be rounded up and napalmed.

Just like your ancestors did the Jews right?

by Anonymousreply 60August 16, 2019 4:27 PM

Fool R60. My ancestors on my mother's side WERE Jewish. So fuck right off.

by Anonymousreply 61August 16, 2019 4:46 PM

And I'm sure they were as self-loathing as you claim gay Republicans are and rounded up plenty of their own kind and sent them to the ovens. What a fabulous family history you. You must be so proud.

by Anonymousreply 62August 16, 2019 4:59 PM

Toots, I don't claim gay republicans are self loathing. I KNOW they're self loathing.

by Anonymousreply 63August 16, 2019 5:01 PM

We absolutely have to get married r53

by Anonymousreply 64August 16, 2019 5:02 PM

We absolutely have to get married r53

by Anonymousreply 65August 16, 2019 5:02 PM

Just like your ancestors. So how many of their fellow Jews did they round up? Less than ten? More than ten? More than 100? Did they steal their neighbor's stuff after they reported them too?

by Anonymousreply 66August 16, 2019 5:03 PM

Agreed, R56.

That was quick!

by Anonymousreply 67August 16, 2019 5:06 PM

Of course they did. LGBT republicans don’t care about the GOP MO towards them. It’s the tax breaks and racism that interest them more. Just look at cockgobbler and this former gay Sean Cody model

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 68August 16, 2019 5:10 PM

Aww R66, are your feelings hurt Nancy? You, and all the sick gay republicans like you, are a sorry piece of work.

by Anonymousreply 69August 16, 2019 5:11 PM

Would you date him this former porn Log Cabin Republican?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 70August 16, 2019 5:11 PM

Of course Trump cares. Now he has a defense against being called anti-LGBT.

These people are traitors and should have no sex from anyone outside their cabal.

by Anonymousreply 71August 16, 2019 5:18 PM

Nobody wants your diseased hole, R71.

by Anonymousreply 72August 16, 2019 5:23 PM

I wonder how much the organization was paid to make such an endorsement?

by Anonymousreply 73August 16, 2019 6:18 PM

These irrelevant groups are just trying to keep their republican street cred by endorsing Chump because they know that 90% of MAGAts still support him. Not that your average republicunt gives a shit about a gay republican group.

by Anonymousreply 74August 16, 2019 6:42 PM

[quote]These irrelevant groups are just trying to keep their republican street cred

And, that's why the gay community must shun them. These people must be metaphorically spat upon because of the miscreants that they are. They should be shamed and asked to leave whenever in the presence of all who believe in honor and decency. UGH! They're just despicable!

by Anonymousreply 75August 16, 2019 6:54 PM

I dated Patrick Guerriero, who used to be president of the Log Cabin Republicans, for a few months. I met him on a trip and we had a summer romance. He's one of the nicest guys I've ever met. Just an all-around great guy. If we didn't live in different states, I think we could have had a lasting relationship.

We rarely talked about politics, but when we did, he was always respectful and polite.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 76August 16, 2019 6:54 PM

^TRAITOR!

by Anonymousreply 77August 16, 2019 6:56 PM

Eww. Who'd admit to dating that?

by Anonymousreply 78August 16, 2019 6:57 PM

R78, Patrick has done more for marriage equality/gay rights than any of us ever will. He's one of the good Republicans.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 79August 16, 2019 7:08 PM

Ah, yes. The “Stop Hitting Yourselves” wing of the Republican Party.

They’re a joke to Republicans.

by Anonymousreply 80August 16, 2019 7:11 PM

[quote]He's one of the good Republicans.

There is no such thing.

by Anonymousreply 81August 16, 2019 7:12 PM

[quote]Patrick has done more for marriage equality/gay rights than any of us ever will.

Such as?

We'll wait...

by Anonymousreply 82August 16, 2019 7:13 PM

R60 is unhinged. Block it and see for yourself.

Trumpers are the craziest people on earth.

by Anonymousreply 83August 16, 2019 7:14 PM

It's starting to smell like Mary Poppins in here.

by Anonymousreply 84August 16, 2019 7:17 PM

They're the "Deplorabelles"!

by Anonymousreply 85August 16, 2019 7:22 PM

You see, R76... I SO WISH IT COULD BE LIKE THIS that is shown in the link! I really, really, do! But, Republicans are hateful! They're very hateful. And, it has been their hatefulness that has brought me to hate them.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 86August 16, 2019 7:25 PM

Log Cabinettes = Deplorable trash. They will never vote for a progressive fighting for their rights no matter how much sweet talk you throw their way.

That is useless, wasted time that both they and Boris want you to spend.

They are too desperate for Daddy’s approval and money.

by Anonymousreply 87August 16, 2019 7:35 PM

R38 What's the weather like in Moscow today Boris...or is it, Natasha?

by Anonymousreply 88August 16, 2019 7:41 PM

They are self-hating, self-interested gays.

by Anonymousreply 89August 16, 2019 7:43 PM

Log Cabin Republicans won't be satisfied until the Republican party gains complete control and starts rounding liberal homosexuals up to be taken off to the execution chambers. They'll squeal with glee, until the vans show up for them after the rest of us all done away with.

by Anonymousreply 90August 16, 2019 7:51 PM

r88, huh? I was responding to this deplorabelle

[quote]You're calling them a deplorable which according to Merriam Webster means this..

by Anonymousreply 91August 16, 2019 8:04 PM

Why do 50% of the people in this world make me want to punch a window in the fucking face!

by Anonymousreply 92August 16, 2019 8:08 PM

[R 12]--"Astro turf" is used to describe groups which purport to be "grassroots" but are actually fronts for big money interests: PACs, corporations, and so forth. I am not sure I would describe Log Cabin Republicans as such, however.

by Anonymousreply 93August 16, 2019 8:10 PM

One must acknowledge the GOP for the evil racist machine that it is and which it has been for many decades.

Supporting it, no matter your 'personal views' is immoral. It cannot be justified. Once you support it, you are tarred with it for the rest of your life.

by Anonymousreply 94August 16, 2019 8:18 PM

Haters gonna hate!

by Anonymousreply 95August 16, 2019 8:23 PM

Is it just me that I found it disturbing that the pic in R13 also showed a gay, black man at the Log Cabin table? I'd hate to hear his world view.

by Anonymousreply 96August 16, 2019 8:27 PM

The Log Cabin scum are gays who hate their sexual orientation, but know they can't change. Being anti-liberal is their sad attempt to rid themselves of their queer demons, at least in their own small minds.

by Anonymousreply 97August 16, 2019 8:41 PM

Poisoned fruits...

by Anonymousreply 98August 16, 2019 8:42 PM

Our newest hate group

by Anonymousreply 99August 16, 2019 8:45 PM

R97, pretty much

by Anonymousreply 100August 16, 2019 8:45 PM

"Jews for Hitler" say wha????

What sad, evil, delusional, self-hating assholes the Log Cabinettes are. I imagine it is a small collection of prissy Marys all desperate to "just be accepted!"

Grease fire.

by Anonymousreply 101August 16, 2019 8:49 PM

There are SOOOO many more gays that are Republican than you have the capacity to wrap your pea-size brain around that the lapse of your situational awareness is comical. This about voting against the democrats crazy ass, three stooges inspired, unhinged race to the left, to see who can come up with most outlandish campaign position directed at having the most crumbling effect on this country then appearing completely flippant while doing so! I don't Gay block vote because I'm Gay. I have other aspects of myself equally important. There are issues bigger than being gay and giving in to some imagined gay lifestyle threat coming from the Trump.( Which is outrageous in it's own right) You can just be Rachel Maddox, I mean Chicken Little for so long! So get the Fuckums over it and your close minded identity politics . Try and get past that pimple covered ,one dimensional nose of yours and see the bigger picture! The over reactions to people on this thread that identify as conservative are outrageous. The hair on fire' shrilling exhibited when an opposing , non left leaning viewpoint is presented is indefensible. We all have a shared emotional and psychological history of coming to terms with our sexuality , the ramifications of that sexuality and who we want to be as people. Nobody with that shared experience deserves to be attacked in this forum, in this community, within the familial energy of this website. Especially where we appreciate and intimately understand too many other things about each other, that only we have in common and can innately enjoy ( humor being one of them) to not also be accepting and respectful of our differences.

by Anonymousreply 102August 16, 2019 9:38 PM

R101. As horrifying as it seems, there was a fascist jewish movement.

Yes, we’re horrified by it. But if we ignore it, it happens again. Oh wait.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 103August 16, 2019 9:42 PM

R85 Deplorabelles haha!

by Anonymousreply 104August 16, 2019 9:46 PM

[quote]There are issues bigger than being gay and giving in to some imagined gay lifestyle threat

Such as what, R102?

by Anonymousreply 105August 16, 2019 9:49 PM

Pardon me, but you don't have to adore liberal democratic policies just because you're gay. There are other alternatives. You can be an independent and pick and choose policies that actually do something good. The fact is the republican party has always had some good platforms, at least in theory. But the vast majority of them are just in name only to get votes. They never have any intention or desire to implement many of the things they espouse before elections. They're just counting on so many people being gullible fools. But to be gay and to align yourself with such a hateful, evil, and criminal outfit such as the current republican party is unforgivable, and quite insane.

by Anonymousreply 106August 16, 2019 9:53 PM

r20, you're suffering from the delusion that these are rational, reasoning people. If they were that, they wouldn't be voting for a monster who is not only a racist he's a bigot as well. These people are so steeped in self loathing that no matter what you say to them, they are going to vote Republican. People who vote for Trump are not flippable. They are demented.

by Anonymousreply 107August 16, 2019 9:57 PM

r102, please get help. You are sick.

by Anonymousreply 108August 16, 2019 9:59 PM

r76, I have walked out of dates with guys who admitted they were Republicans. I don't know how you dated one for months, especially one who heads a group like LCR. No matter how nice he might have seemed on the surface, there is something very wrong with a gay person who would support a political party that would deny them equal rights and treat them as second-class citizens.

by Anonymousreply 109August 16, 2019 10:03 PM

[quote]These people are so steeped in self loathing

It doesn't have to be just self loathing. Who ever said that gay white males cannot be just racist, believe in their white privilege, and/or be just as capitalistic, as their straight white brothers?

Plenty of "No Asians. No Blacks." on the Grindr.

by Anonymousreply 110August 16, 2019 10:03 PM

All of those things come into play, I'm sure. But self loathing is definitely a part of it as well. There has to be a part of you that hates yourself if you intentionally keep yourself down.

by Anonymousreply 111August 16, 2019 10:07 PM

It's like having a trumpster in the family. Oy.

by Anonymousreply 112August 16, 2019 10:08 PM

Ahem....

We're waiting, R102....

[quote]There are issues bigger than being gay and giving in to some imagined gay lifestyle threat

Such as?

by Anonymousreply 113August 16, 2019 10:09 PM

Why wait r67? How often do you get a snug fit of passionate likes and dislikes? We must away! Papa has a shotgun.

by Anonymousreply 114August 16, 2019 10:18 PM

Oh go grab yourself by the pussy r102.

by Anonymousreply 115August 16, 2019 10:23 PM

[quote] Why do 50% of the people in this world make me want to punch a window in the fucking face!

Just 50%??? Oh, hunny.

by Anonymousreply 116August 16, 2019 10:24 PM

The man wants to punch a window in the face and you're worried about the 50% part?

by Anonymousreply 117August 16, 2019 10:32 PM

R102 is adorable! Adorable in the way Hitler was adorable as a newborn

by Anonymousreply 118August 16, 2019 10:49 PM

I think the term you're looking for is colicky, r118.

by Anonymousreply 119August 16, 2019 11:13 PM

[quote][R76], I have walked out of dates with guys who admitted they were Republicans. I don't know how you dated one for months, especially one who heads a group like LCR.

Because I'm a mature adult who treats everyone with respect. There is so much more to someone than just their political affiliation. I learned that with Patrick. My guess is that Patrick wouldn't even call himself a Republican anymore, much like Nicole Wallace and Joe Scarborough.

If you watch him speak, he puts Pete B. to shame, and I love Pete.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 120August 16, 2019 11:48 PM

'There is so much more to someone than just their political affiliation"

Yes but these areas are not compartmentalized. Politics is about core values ultimately. I dated a Republican briefly. I was curious. He was great in many ways. But... No, can't live with that.

by Anonymousreply 121August 16, 2019 11:52 PM

I'm Canadian and at times I could barely agree with the possibility that my then-leaning-conservative boyfriend might one day become a member of the Conservative party (today he's mostly to the left of me). There's no way in hell I could date a Republican, unless maybe (1% chance) they're a severe reformist and nearly an independent in their voting practices.

In the upcoming election I'm either going NDP or Liberal and I can see my boyfriend going Liberal.

Above post is right that its all tax breaks and racism. Amazing how that consumes all of someone's political interest.

by Anonymousreply 122August 17, 2019 12:10 AM

[quote]There is so much more to someone than just their political affiliation.

But republicans don't have lips.

Apparently they are chopped off when you join the party.

by Anonymousreply 123August 17, 2019 12:21 AM

For the second time in a week, the Trump administration has attempted to erode workplace protections for LGBTQ+ employees.

As BuzzFeed was the first to report, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a brief to the Supreme Court on Friday that claims federal law does not prevent employers from firing workers based solely on their gender identity. Under debate is Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbids discrimination on the basis of characteristics like race, color, national origin, religion, and sex.

Just this week, news broke that the White House is attempting to force the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to reverse its position on whether Title VII protects workers on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The EEOC has held that it does, while the Trump administration has done everything in its power since 2017 to rollback LGBTQ+ rights across the board.

But, but, but.... Patrick is such a NICE and GOOD gay Republican....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 124August 17, 2019 12:25 AM

Scott Cullens

Log Cabin Republicans:

You are not edgy, interesting, conservative, or thinking outside the box. You are an abomination to the people you are supporting. You inviting Mike Pence to dinner? He thinks you are disgusting. Gay people voting for Trump/Pence is like Blacks for David Duke. You can argue that he cut your taxes - not true. You can argue you are conservative - they are not. You can argue that you are right to life - they could care less about children at the border. You can argue that you are more in line with conservative values - Fascism is not conservative. You can argue it’s because you are fiscally conservative - highest debt ever incurred by this administration.

There are several of you who do it for attention. Sad, because nothing else about you is interesting enough? If you want to be interesting, do something that supports the people who share your fight for equality.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 125August 17, 2019 12:37 AM

'There is so much more to someone than just their political affiliation"

Not really. Your political ideals reflect exactly who you are as a person in every sense.

by Anonymousreply 126August 17, 2019 12:46 AM

"Because I'm a mature adult who treats everyone with respect."

The point is, if he was head of the Log Cabin Republicans, he doesn't treat HIMSELF with respect.

by Anonymousreply 127August 17, 2019 12:54 AM

Don’t Call Me a Log Cabin Republican

CASEY PICK·THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 2019·READING TIME: 6 MINUTES

(Note: this is entirely my own personal opinion and does not reflect the opinion of any organization I am or have been affiliated with)

In the almost 15 years since the internship that formed the basis of my undergraduate thesis, I have been called many names because of my association with the Log Cabin Republicans. “Uncle Tom.” “Quisling.” “Chicken for Colonel Sanders” was a personal favorite during the years I was on the national staff. Though the words sometimes hurt, I was always able to withstand them because I knew the principles I was fighting for, and the work we were doing, were worth it. I knew the caliber of the people I was standing with, and the shoulders I was standing on – people like Congressman Jim Kolbe, who spoke at the 2000 Republican National Convention as a proud gay man, though delegates turned their backs on him; people like my first boss, Patrick Guerriero, who as Log Cabin’s executive director refused to endorse George W. Bush after his support for the Federal Marriage Amendment, though it meant turning his back on the rest of the GOP in turn (though like with Jim, many of those Republicans who publicly spurned him would privately confess their respect for Log Cabin’s decision and beg our forgiveness).

I believed in our rallying cry, the idea that “inclusion wins” and Log Cabin’s mission was to build a stronger, more inclusive GOP. Though I left the organization’s national staff after the 2012 election, the talking points still roll off my tongue. We were LGBT by virtue of the same nature and nature’s God who imbued us with our inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; we were Republicans because of our belief in individual liberty, personal responsibility, a confident foreign policy and strong national defense, free markets and limited government. We were Log Cabin Republicans because we wanted to recall to our fellows the meaning of being the Party of Lincoln, which meant being a party of freedom that recognized our shared fundamental humanity across differences. To be a Log Cabin Republican was not, as many think, a matter of identity traits – not merely about being conservatives who happen to be LGBT – but about principles that transcend identity, with a mission of ensuring our nation and party treated LGBT people consistent with our nation’s and party’s ideals.

It is precisely because I know what Log Cabin has been at its best, and what it could be under proper leadership, that I know the endorsement of President Trump for 2020 announced today reflects something other than the LCR I knew. I know personally the calculations that go into Log Cabin’s decision of whether or not to endorse a presidential candidate; I saw the aftermath of rejecting George W. Bush, I was part of the process leading to the endorsement of John McCain… and mine was the hand that wrote the announcement and explanation of our endorsement of Mitt Romney in 2012. In that endorsement, we did not sugarcoat the candidate’s flaws; we acknowledged that we were coldly weighing the benefits of having a conservative we felt we could work with in office against our calculation that the Federal Marriage Amendment he had supported was no longer a threat, and making a call that would have allowed us to be a voice of influence on behalf of LGBT people if Romney were to have won. I am not ashamed to have written that endorsement.

I am convinced that the Board of Directors of today’s Log Cabin Republicans should be ashamed to have put their names on this one.

by Anonymousreply 128August 17, 2019 1:01 AM

Or they would be, if the Board were the ones to bear the responsibility of defending their choice. Unfortunately, with the exception of the two who will fade into the background after this one op-ed, that sad duty will likely fall to the lone remaining staffer, Log Cabin’s president, Jerri Ann Henry. When she was hired less than a year ago, I was hopeful that despite watching the organization’s slide toward Trump apologism under Gregory T. Angelo, their hiring a skilled and principled operative like Henry meant the organization would finally be able to again be a conscience this party needs, honoring our legacy of fighting for the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” by rebuking the president for his transgender military ban, or working to support Republican candidates that could win suburban women voters who reject this administration’s ugliness (and incidentally tend to support LGBT rights). I publicly celebrated her hiring, and encouraged my peers in the LGBT advocacy community to give LCR another shot, knowing that a vibrant and effective Log Cabin could be a godsend during a Trump/Pence administration. I went to my first Log Cabin gathering in years, hopeful for reconciliation with an organization I had once loved and served with all my heart.

But instead I’ve watched as her hands have been tied from the beginning by a Board and membership that, like the party as a whole, has seen its best people walk away, leaving behind a sad remnant that increasingly fulfils the stereotypes that used to be slung at Log Cabin Republicans: overwhelmingly gay men who are indifferent to the experiences of women, transgender Americans, or LGBT people who lack the financial or social resources to protect them from the discrimination that they so often deny even exists. They are more likely to complain that “it is harder to come out as conservative than as gay” (which, even if it were true, no self-respecting red-blooded conservative would ever whine that way) than to challenge anything but the worst homophobia (except when it aligns with the president’s penchant for condemning non-Russian foreign countries), and are generally perfectly willing to overlook transgender people being denied equal opportunities to make a living or wear our nation’s uniform, because “we didn’t sign up to fight for that.” Don’t believe me? Read the endorsement again, and note how, despite the obligatory invocation of “LGBTQ,” when they talk about policies and Trump’s supposed support for the community, the word “transgender” is nowhere to be found. When I was the programs director for Log Cabin, I added LGBT to our organizational style guide; our team emphasized the needs of trans people fighting for the Employment Nondiscrimination Act – LCR once knew how to advocate for the whole LGBT community, even if it we didn’t always agree with the rest of the movement on how best to do so. They have now chosen not to. I hate to say it, but it has to be said: by aligning themselves with Trump’s ‘own the libs’ tribalist mentality, Log Cabin has ironically devolved into the worst kind of identity politics; insular, defensive, self-pitying, and bitter, instead of the proud, principled group it once was.

Others will explain, I am certain, exactly why this endorsement’s claim that “Trump met his commitments to LGBTQ Americans” is a lie from the pit of hell. That it arrives barely a day after the administration has proposed rules potentially gutting an executive order ensuring federal tax dollars are not used to discriminate is only the latest example of their having been conned by one of the least subtle con-men our nation has ever known. I just want to put it on record that it did not have to be this way, and express my grief that, in a time when we most need a proud Republican organization willing to speak out for the idea that inclusion wins, we don’t have one anymore.

Call me any name you please - and I know folks will - but please, don’t call me a Log Cabin Republican.

by Anonymousreply 129August 17, 2019 1:02 AM

Anybody who spends 15 minutes on DL knows that homocons are completely, absolutely, 150% barking batshit crazy.

by Anonymousreply 130August 17, 2019 1:22 AM

Is there a link to that R128?

by Anonymousreply 131August 17, 2019 1:35 AM

They should all be gathered in one place and tickled to death.

by Anonymousreply 132August 17, 2019 1:44 AM

I found it on FaceBook, R128. I did not post the FB link because I didn't think that everyone, (who wished to) could access it.... OOPS! I guess it is gone. I started with a twitter feed that was then linked to this FB article/page

by Anonymousreply 133August 17, 2019 1:44 AM

Found it, R131

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 134August 17, 2019 1:51 AM

[quote]many of those Republicans who publicly spurned him would privately confess their respect for Log Cabin’s decision and beg our forgiveness

There's no MARY! like a Log Cabinette MARY!

MARY!!!!

by Anonymousreply 135August 17, 2019 3:26 AM

[quote]Why do 50% of the people in this world make me want to punch a window in the fucking face!

Windows have faces?

by Anonymousreply 136August 17, 2019 10:13 AM

LCRs are Uncle Bottoms, 100%. They are people with profound and delusional disconnects from reality, and as such should be avoided and ignored, and viewed from a distance as sad sacks. Which is what happens pretty much all the time.

by Anonymousreply 137August 17, 2019 1:43 PM

This endorsement/issue is being discussed on AMJoy right now

by Anonymousreply 138August 17, 2019 3:42 PM

AM Joy w/Joy Reid @amjoyshow . @Jimmyspolitics

: I appreciate #Trump trying to decriminalize homosexuality across the world. The problem is being fired for being gay is not decriminalized in 29 states in America. I can't adopt a child in South Carolina because #Trump granted S.C. a waiver in Jan. 2019. #AMJoy

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 139August 17, 2019 4:10 PM

It’s the tale of the Scorpion and the Frog

by Anonymousreply 140August 17, 2019 4:44 PM

LOL! I LOVED THIS HEADLINE!

Log Cabin Republican burned to the ground on live TV for ‘idiotic’ op-ed defending Trump on LGBTQ issues

On Saturday’s edition of “AM Joy,” former Senate aide Jimmy Williams clashed with Log Cabin Republicans spokesman Charles Moran over his Washington Post op-ed hailing President Donald Trump for supposedly taking “bold actions that benefit the LGBTQ community.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 141August 17, 2019 9:06 PM

Let me get one thing ah straight.

I admit I haven't read all the posts here but what is the point of the Log Cabin Republicans? Why not just Republicans?

I wonder what they actually do for gays except to recruit gays to the GOP since the party has steadfastly and perhaps incrementally pursued an anti gay agenda. Oh dear, have I answered myself?

by Anonymousreply 142August 17, 2019 9:41 PM

[quote]I admit I haven't read all the posts here but what is the point of the Log Cabin Republicans? Why not just Republicans?

But, daddy, daddy, PLEASE! I'm like the other kids! I believe as you do. But, I can't help it if I love my same sex. I was born this way...

Please love me too...

by Anonymousreply 143August 17, 2019 11:43 PM

R143: NO DADDY! Not the belt again! It hurts my bottom! I promise to vote to ban abortion and elect the evangelical mayor. Just no more belting! Oh Daddy!

by Anonymousreply 144August 17, 2019 11:48 PM

WOW!!!!!!

Log Cabin's Trump Endorsement Proves They Are Morally Bankrupt Racists

Log Cabin Republicans will sell the entire community out for a gentrified loft, an expense account, and a white neighborhood excluding the hired help.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 145August 18, 2019 2:32 PM

That's a really good essay, r145.

by Anonymousreply 146August 18, 2019 8:04 PM

We have a rather triggered Log Cabinette here I see.

Fortunately I already had that psychotic cunt blocked.

by Anonymousreply 147August 18, 2019 10:55 PM

Trump ignores Log Cabin endorsement

"Charles Moran, a Log Cabin spokesperson, said in response to a Blade question on whether they privately obtained a response the Trump campaign was involved with Log Cabin in the process leading up to the endorsement.

“We had multiple meetings with senior campaign officials at HQ in Arlington before we started this process and they were enthusiastic,” Moran said. “We discussed coordinating volunteer efforts, media surrogates, political priorities and messaging for the LGBTQ community. We walked them through the endorsement process, and once it became clear the endorsement would pass, we informed them how we would be communicating this to our membership, stakeholders and the public. Throughout this process, they were welcoming of our support, were desiring of our endorsement and offered technical assistance if needed.”

After nearly a full day passed following Log Cabin Republicans’ endorsement of President Trump for re-election in 2020, neither Trump himself nor his campaign has issued a public acknowledgement of the LGBT Republican group’s support.

Trump — who’s never shy to brag about his support on Twitter — has said nothing about Log Cabin on social media accounts, nor has the Trump campaign. The Trump campaign also didn’t respond to multiple requests from the Washington Blade to comment.

Log Cabin declined to endorse Trump in 2016. Cited as reasoning for the 2020 endorsement, which was announced in an op-ed for the Washington Post, was Trump “taking bold actions that benefit LGBT community.”

The op-ed downplays an anti-LGBT record that includes a transgender military ban and administrative actions undercutting LGBT rights in the name of “religious freedom.”

In contrast to Trump, Romney in 2012 signaled public appreciation for Log Cabin’s support, even though as a candidate he backed a U.S. constitutional amendment that would have banned same-sex marriage throughout the country.

“Gov. Romney is pleased to have the support of the Log Cabin Republicans and looks forward to working together for the future of our country,” Romney spokesperson Andrea Saul said at the time.

Shunned again....

by Anonymousreply 148August 19, 2019 1:38 AM

^^Denied Daddy's approval yet again. Oh well, they should be used to that by now.

by Anonymousreply 149August 19, 2019 2:19 AM

I SWEAR I do NOT understand this and these people! And, ya know... I'm actually considering becoming a part of this group (like a spy) in order to try and somehow learn what is making them tick. The group has 42 members already (closed membership list-lol!) with 7 attendees who have already rsvp'd this event.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 150August 20, 2019 11:20 AM

The day after the Log Cabin endorsement, Trump's DOJ submitted an amicus brief to the SCOTUS saying LGBT have no constitutional protections to keep their jobs.

That is, they can be fired just for being LGBT.

by Anonymousreply 151August 20, 2019 3:27 PM

[quote]I'm actually considering becoming a part of this group (like a spy) in order to try and somehow learn what is making them tick.

Really? Why on earth would you? Do you think they have actual power? Why expend the energy infiltrating them? They’re a joke to both sides. Also, what “makes them tick” is not really a mystery. They hate themselves, and hate other LGBTQs even more. They're desperate for “Daddy’s” acceptance and approval. They’re also typical Republicans in that racism and greed are their primary political motivators. They’re garden-variety gay Fascists, nothing more. If you really want to do something, join a progressive group and get to work making actual change. Infiltrating these idiots would accomplish nothing.

by Anonymousreply 152August 20, 2019 3:47 PM

Maybe you're right, R172. But, I tell ya... I am curious. A conservative, Republican, meet up group that's started in NYC, and by a black gay man???? LOL!!!!

by Anonymousreply 153August 20, 2019 3:50 PM

R152 is onto something in his analysis. You might as well infiltrate the Catholic League. It's only Bill Donohue and an internet connection (which used to just be a fax machine,) but go ahead and infiltrate. The Log Cabin Republicans amount to little more. The mainstream of the GOP won't have anything to do with them. No one does, except media outlets desperate to fill column inches. They have no political power. They just self-promote. The Kardashians are far more powerful. Tori Spelling is more powerful.

by Anonymousreply 154August 20, 2019 3:53 PM

Board member resigns from Republican LGBT group Log Cabin Republicans over Trump endorsement

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 155August 20, 2019 5:54 PM

Board member resigns from Republican LGBT group Log Cabin Republicans over Trump endorsement

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 156August 20, 2019 5:54 PM

GOOD FOR HER!

Jennifer Horn

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 157August 20, 2019 5:58 PM

[quote] “I just got an award and an endorsement yesterday from a, a, uh, the exact group, a group, they gave, you saw that, uh, they gave me the endorsement yesterday,” Trump stammered.

This is what the Log Cabin Republicans endorsed...a racist, sexist, irresponsible, imbecilic liar!

The moron said this the other day in response to a question from a reporter about his Administrations policy of denying equal protection rights in employment to the LGBT community. The moron ignored the question and made something up.

Log Cabin Republicans have demonstrated that they prefer a racist, a misogynist, a man credibly accused of sexual assault by multiple women, a moron, and a liar as POTUS.

They, too, must embrace his worldview.

Pathetic lickspittles!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 158August 23, 2019 4:25 PM

Exclusive: Log Cabin executive director resigns over Trump endorsement

Jerri Ann Henry, who was the first woman to lead the LGBT Republican group, formally submitted her resignation Friday and left Monday after discussions with board members characterized as “harsh,” sources familiar with Log Cabin told the Blade.

The resignation follows intense criticism of Log Cabin, which announced its support for Trump earlier this month without its members having met with him or having received any explicit commitments in exchange.

Sources said Henry’s discontent with Trump and dissatisfaction with Log Cabin’s approach to defending its Trump endorsement in the media were key among her reasons for stepping down.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 159August 29, 2019 3:33 AM

Log Cabin's Robert Kabel and Jill Homan

These two are apparently the culprits. Has anyone read anything of how these two are justifying this endorsement? Were they paid?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 160August 29, 2019 3:43 AM

Someone needs to explain to me how their former endorsements were better than Trump. When it comes to economic, foreign, and diplomatic policy, the Democrats don't offer any alternative. When it comes to gay rights, Trump's administration isn't any more regressive than past Republican administrations. Trans rights was never even talked about. In general, what intellectual argument does someone who is a Republican have in voting for a Democrat when they disagree on just about everything? I'm just curious.

It's like with Scaramucci. He's praised Trump endlessly and then after Trump insults him, he does a complete turnaround? Aren't you just broadcasting to the world that your ego is more important than your principles?

by Anonymousreply 161August 29, 2019 4:46 AM

Wrong, Trump is appointing judges that are more radically Antigay and rightwing than any administration in history. Trump supports the notion that “religious liberty” should overrule anti discrimination laws and policies. Trump empowers the Antigay religious right in ways no other administration has done. Trump has stubbed federal agency websites of LGBT policies and information in a way not even Bush did. Trump went out of his way to say that the Pride flag could not fly on embassy flagpoles. Trump refused to officially recognize Pride Month. Trump is opposing the Equality Act and efforts to interpret Title VII as already prohibiting antiLGBT bias.

by Anonymousreply 162August 29, 2019 11:25 AM

Log Cabin was founded with the mission to move the Republican party towards policies of equal rights regardless of sexual orientation. After several decades the Republican party is more anti-gay than ever, so they obviously failed, and only an idiot can't see that. De facto their mission is just to give some kind of lame cover to homophobes: "These gay people support the Republicans! So Republicans can't be homophobic!"

by Anonymousreply 163August 29, 2019 11:58 AM

I think it would be interesting to know what went on here. This is the first time that I'm aware of such a split in this club. Is this the rich against everyone else sort of case? It seems that it is only the rich that definitely wants Trump re-elected.

by Anonymousreply 164August 29, 2019 12:03 PM

@ [R102] - soon as I saw 'lifestyles' in your post, I knew you were full of shit. Too too obvious darling, like 'Democrat" party. Busted.

by Anonymousreply 165August 29, 2019 3:11 PM

Has anyone else found it interesting the LCR haven't posted on FB since all the resignations of their top leadership after they endorsed Trump? I think that they're destructing from within. The only members left will be the self-loathing.

by Anonymousreply 166August 30, 2019 12:53 PM

LogCabin Republicans are like roaches voting for Raid. Your own party has no room for you. And forget the “fiscally responsible” argument... their #taxscam and general economic stewardship has amassed a TRILLION-DOLLAR DEFICIT

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 167October 11, 2019 3:44 PM

Let’s wait until the trans women announce they’ve taken over the leadership roles.

by Anonymousreply 168October 12, 2019 8:11 PM

Oh, yes R168. I shall pray for a significant contingent of trannies to join the Log Cabin Club. Perfect.

by Anonymousreply 169October 12, 2019 8:22 PM

LogCabinRepublicans @LogCabinGOP Nov 8

It’s pretty clear that the HRC’s mission is just to elect Democrats, not advance equality amongst the #LGBTQ community. H/t to @brad_polumbo for highlighting the most recent example of #TDS by Gay, Inc.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 170November 11, 2019 7:33 PM

epic-- failure Everything went wrong when these gay Trump supporters tried throwing their own MAGA rally

A gaggle of gay Trump supporters gathered for their own MAGA rally in Wilton Manors, Florida on Monday. Unfortunately, things didn’t go as planed.

Members of the Broward County Log Cabin Republicans were reportedly outnumbered 3-1 by counter protesters. Not just that, but they experienced sound problems when their loudspeaker failed.

Whomp, whomp.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 171January 16, 2020 6:26 PM

This is special;

Michael Rajner @MichaelRajner

A small sample of the speech given today by Andrew Brett, president of the Broward Log Cabin Republicans. I took the liberty to circle his typos. Needless to say, Brett is willfully ignorant of @DWStweets & @TedDeutch leadership on #LGBT issues. @browardpolitics @SFGN

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 172January 16, 2020 6:31 PM

The Broward County Log Cabin Republicans’ president accused Democrats Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib of supporting Sharia law and the executions of LGBT+ people in a bizarre, conspiracy-laden rant.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 173January 16, 2020 6:42 PM

R173 - is that not true?

by Anonymousreply 174January 16, 2020 6:53 PM

You tell me, R174. Do you believe that?

by Anonymousreply 175January 16, 2020 6:58 PM

Are they not Shariatarians? Have they renounced their muslimhood? Really, truly, deep down renounced it?

by Anonymousreply 176January 16, 2020 7:09 PM

are they called "log" because they want wood, or because they'e dumb as a stump?

by Anonymousreply 177January 16, 2020 7:46 PM

Today's news:

"Florida Republicans submit 4 anti-gay bills on last day to file The bills would repeal LGBTQ antidiscrimination ordinances, criminalize trans health care for minors and allow conversion therapy in places that had banned it."

by Anonymousreply 178January 16, 2020 7:47 PM

Like every other group or individual supporting Trump, they are in a cult. They support Dear Leader because he is Dear Leader. The cult was not yet established in 2016 when they withheld an endorsement, but the cult is now established and every Republican organization and politician and lobbyist and donor is a cult member. There is no reason to debate them. It would be like debating a scientologist on whether L. Ron Hubbard was a good or bad influence on the world. We simply have to outvote and outorganize these people. There is no winning over cult members in the short term. (Once Trump is gone, some will announce that they were never cult members, but they will be lying.)

by Anonymousreply 179January 16, 2020 10:42 PM

BUT... DADDY, DADDY, PLEASE!!!!

Log Cabin Republicans shunned by their own party, can’t even get a booth at upcoming convention

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 180February 6, 2020 7:08 PM

sad sacks of shit

by Anonymousreply 181February 6, 2020 7:09 PM

sad sacks of shit

by Anonymousreply 182February 6, 2020 7:09 PM

What's a gay version of an Uncle Tom? Oh, right...a Miss Lindsey! I forgot.

by Anonymousreply 183February 6, 2020 7:32 PM

For the twentieth year in a row, the State Republican Executive Committee has denied the LGBTQ group a booth at the state’s upcoming Republican convention. They can’t even get a card table in a dark corner near the handicap bathrooms.

In a statement, Houston chapter president Marco Roberts called the state GOP’s decision disappointing.

“Obviously, we are very disappointed with the decision made by our elected representatives,” he said.

Yet despite the fact that the party clearly wants absolutely positively nothing to do with them, Roberts seems intent on remaining a glutton for punishment.

“Many have told us that it is upon us to make the case for ourselves,” he said. “We agree, and we intend to do that, for us, and for our great party.”

Charles Moran, managing director of the national Log Cabin Republicans, tells the Washington Examiner, “There is no place in modern political discourse for the venom and sheer ignorance displayed by those opposing Log Cabin recognition in the party.”

Can't fix stupid.

by Anonymousreply 184February 6, 2020 7:38 PM

Their go-to reply about the anti-gay stance in the Repub party has been that they want to 'work from the inside' and 'produce change' within the party about LGBT issues.

Well, it's been several decades and no successes to speak of whatsoever.

I can't wrap my head around these people - except that their delusion is so deep, just like other Republicans. Facts mean nothing to them either. Cult.

by Anonymousreply 185February 6, 2020 7:45 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!