Drugs, meltdowns and 'gay sex' rumours - how 'rivalry and hatred' tore One Direction apart

“But it was very serious and their friendship has never recovered. Everyone involved in the band is well aware of the animosity between them.

“It’s been central to everything else that came next with the band because there was suddenly a massive divide.”

From that point on Harry apparently refused to even travel with Louis and the fall-out would become so serious that bosses reportedly had to find a way to make their last three albums without the boys having to spend any time together in the studio.

However, Niall dismissed the claims, telling fans not to believe the reports.

"We stand strong as a band and we’re brothers," he tweeted.

Those 'gay sex' rumours

One theory was that the 'Larry Stylinson' fan fiction depicting the pair as lovers had pushed them apart.

Louis, in particular, was extremely sensitive about the claims and admitted the speculation about their sexuality 'created an atmosphere'.

"People can believe what they want, but it comes across as a little bit disrespectful to the ones that I love, like (girlfriend) Eleanor (Calder)," he said.

"I'm so protective over things like that, about the people I love. So it created this atmosphere between the two of us."

Zayn told how Harry and Louis had even dialled back their physical friendship in an attempt to stop the rumours.

"It's not funny, and it still continues to be quite hard for them. They won't naturally go put their arm around each other because they're conscious of this thing that's going on, which is not even true," he said.

While Harry likes to keep people guessing about his sexuality, refusing to put a label on it, Louis has categorically said he is heterosexual.

And he was raging when a cartoon featured in HBO show Euphoria depicted a sex scene between him and Harry last month.

"I can categorically say that I was not contacted nor did I approve it," he raged on Twitter , with a source telling The Sun he was 'angered' that an 'awkward' situation had been made worse.

Drug scandal

Whatever the cause of the tension, the rift only grew wider when Zayn and Louis were filmed smoking what appeared to be cannabis in the back of an SUV en route to a concert in Peru in 2014.

Narrating from behind the camera as he filmed Zayn lighting what appeared to be a joint, Louis could be heard saying, "So here we are, leaving Peru. Joint lit. Happy days!"

Talking about Zayn taking his warm-up 'seriously', he continued, "One very very important factor of Zayn’s warm up of course if Mary J herself. In fact I will present it to him now for some fantastic singing."

Straight-laced Harry - who wasn't even much of a drinker - was apparently 'furious' they'd taken the shine off the start of their UK stadium tour with their 'stupid and reckless' behaviour.

"Harry is annoyed about the whole debacle. This should be one of the biggest weeks of the band's career... Instead it has been taken over by this controversy," an insider told The Sun.

"Despite Harry's reputation, he's incredibly professional and mature, and not into these sorts of antics," the source added.

Booze battles

It wasn't just Louis and Zayn who were in Harry's bad books.

Liam's partying was so out of control that Harry reportedly refused to go socialise with the band unless good guy Niall was there to keep the peace. The pressure of spending two solid years on the road coupled with rumours about their future caused Liam to have a backstage meltdown in October 2015 with the band forced to cancel the gig in Belfast.

"The pressures of fame and being on the road for two years have made Liam ill," a source told The Sun of the star, who would go on to admit fame 'nearly killed me'.

“He was devastated about letting everyone down, especially the fans, but he wasn’t physically able to get on stage. He had a complete meltdown.”

On another occasion he turned up to a fan event so drunk that it finally gave him a wake-up call.

"I'm not afraid to say that I actually went through a pretty bad [drinking] stage," he told Attitude magazine.

"There were just a few times that I went over the limit with things and then I had to pull it back.

"I was very fortunate that I had lots of great people around me who said to me, 'Look Liam, you need to chill out a bit now.'"

Admitting he used alcohol to cope with the strain of performing near-constant touring, he said being drunk was like putting on a Disney costume before stepping out on stage.

"Underneath the Disney costume I was pissed quite a lot of the time because there was no other way to get your head around what was going on,” he told Men's Health.

“I mean, it was fun. We had an absolute blast, but there were certain parts of it where it just got a little bit toxic.”

The pact

The band was fraying at the seams. Zayn was constantly in the headlines, accused of cheating on then-fiancée Perrie Edwar - which he vehemently denied.

There were rumours that he wanted out of 1D - despite the deal they were said to have made to release five albums and a greatest hits record before going on a 'hiatus'.

But Zayn blindsided everyone by suddenly quitting in March 2015 after a concert in Hong Kong.

In a statement he later admitted had nothing to do with him, he claimed he wanted to be a 'normal 22- year old'.

"I wasn't going to spend another minute doing something which made me ill and which I no longer believed in," he said of his shock exit.

Harry was seen openly crying on stage during their performance the next night.

But behind the scenes, the lads were reportedly furious.

“The others knew Zayn would have a head start by leaving first, like Robbie Williams did when he quit Take That," said a pal.

“It was frustrating to them as Zayn only had to hang on in there a few months and 1D would have gone on their long break united.”

Zayn would later go so far as to claim he'd wanted to leave the band from the very beginning and that he hated their music.

Friends no more?

Meanwhile, absence has only made the feud grow stronger, particularly between Louis and Zayn after the latter failed to support him on the X Factor following his mum's death in December 2016.

"I had a couple of calls with him after I lost my mum and all the boys had agreed to come to that performance and he didn't show, so that really bugged me," he said on the Dan Wootton podcast.

"It was just seeing everyone there – Harry, Niall and Liam – that was what I needed that night, that support," he said. "So on the other end of the spectrum it kind of really showed. So, eh, I hope he's alright, but..."

Niall admits he doesn't even have Zayn's number and that he's constantly changing it, while Zayn sniped that he didn't 'really' speak to Harry when they were in the band so didn't expect to have a friendship after.

"I ain't spoke to any of them for a long time, to be honest with you. That's just the way it is," he told Vogue.

"There's things that happen and things that were said after I left...Snide things. Small things that I would never have expected."

So could they ever reunite?

While Louis says it's 'inevitable', Harry reportedly isn't on the same wavelength.

“Since stepping away from 1D Harry has really enjoyed life outside that pop bubble," a source said.

“And right now he has absolutely no desire to get 1D back together.”

MARY!

(/italic)And right now he has absolutely no desire to get 1D back together.(/italic)

I say bullshit. Their "reunion" is being meticulously orchestrated. Those kids know where their bread is buttered and they get along just fine.

I am a Larry shipper, a Larry believer if you will.

None of them have much of a solo career. The reunion is inevitable. Unless someone got raped, nothing happened between the lads that would prohibit them from ever working together again.

Zayn had the biggest solo potential but squandered it

Why we still need thread blocking.

R8: Harry's career is not mainstream but it's pretty solid and his concerts sell very well. He doesn't need the band at all.

All five are filthy rich so they really don't need a reunion.

And i can't stand Louis, the gay rumours started with his behaviour but he couldn't handle them, and he always overreacts

Louis is a jerk

Hasn't it been usual with boy bands that while 1-2 of them is a problem that we either never see in limelight again or else dies (and 1-2 of them are gay), around their 30s+ the band gets back together for more income and most problems are water under the bridge? I could see that happening here. For example Zayn backing away, Harry getting over himself and at a point that he's almost certainly not hitting a new height again, and the rest get into the idea of doing tours for aging millennials or whatever.

The problem here is Zayn has way bigger problems than a reunion, he had it all to have a great solo career, but it's pretty obvious he has a drug problem.

Harry is doing what he wants and he is successful. It's not the right moment for him to do a reunion even if he was interested (something that i doubt).

The other three probable were on board. Niall career is perfectly ok, at least he is able to have his songs on the radio without any problem.

It was obvious from the very beginning that Louis doesn't have a chance as a solo artist, his voice is average, he has no charisma and he is not even that good looking. I suppose at least he'll be happy the gay rumours are not that prominent anymore, in fact i think there are a good bunch of people who think he is an homophobe

So was zayn a druggie or did he have an eating ng disorder? I can’t remember..

Harry is a flaming Stevie Nicks fangirl!

R15 Officially it was an eating disorder, but apparently they did cocaine as well as weed in 1D and combined with his erratic behaviour, his "anxiety" and his missed 1D performances, I'd say that his eating disorder was a consequence of his drug us. He seems to eat a little bit more these days, but it's clear he's not over the drugs, because his tweets are a mess and his once promising solo career isn't going anywhere - and not due to lack of talent or support from his label. He just refuses to do anything, apparently. I honestly think Gigi cared about him, but even she has abandoned ship by now.

There were rumors that the record company was trying to go through with a reunion, but Harry was completely against it and was trying to get out of it. I would've thought that Zayn would've been the one to do that. Rumor or no rumor.

R14 You're not wrong about Louis, but I still like him. I think people underestimate how important he was for One Direction, because he wasn't as pretty as Zayn or as charismatic as Harry. One Direction weren't exactly known for their amazing musical talents or inspired songs during the X-Factor days. But Louis was always the clown in the video diaries and backstage interviews. If things threatened to be too normal or boring, he always did something absolutely crazy and caused the other boys to be crazy and funny as well. I'm convinced they wouldn't have gone that far, if it weren't for their banter, their pranks, their general light-hearted camaraderie and Louis was always a big factor in this. They were like the naughty boys in school teenage girls secretly admired for livening things up.

But I think he was also important when it came to more serious business, because he was the one, who went against their songwriter and label after the second album and ensured that their sound became more "mature". He was responsible for the split from Savan Kotecha, who wanted to keep them musically firmly in boyband territory. As a result of the split they contributed more own material and their sound (and look) became more stadium friendly pop rock, which I think ensured their success during the whole 5-6 years.

Apart from this, I think his solo career efforts have also been overshadowed by the personal tragedies he suffered. The fact that both his mother and sister died in the past 2 years is really awful. A lot of people would spiral out of control after this and we're talking about him not being successful enough in his solo career. It feels a bit unfair.

R18 When should this reunion have happened? No wonder that Harry was against it, he has no reason to reunite with 1D right now.

R11 The gay rumours didn't really start because of Louis' banter and jokes. The boys obviously got along well, especially so Louis and Harry, and they were acting like typical British teenage boys, if you ask me. The gay rumours started because their fandom consisted of a bunch of slash fiction writing fangirls that went crazy with their imagination and badly written gay porn. Don't get me wrong, gay rumours were probably in every boyband - you put 4 or 5 pretty, young boys together and people like to imagine them together. But One Direction happened in the age of social media, which was their luck and caused them to get big in the US as well. But it also meant that any gay rumors or "ships" really blew up, because those little girls were all over tumblr and wattpad with their steamy stories of "Larry". In the good old 90s such girls were maybe sitting at home and dreaming about Nick having sex with AJ, but in the 2010s they could dedicate whole blogs and instagram accounts to this and influence other girls, who became "Larries" in turn. And suddenly it was everywhere. Honestly, there is not one 1D video on youtube, where there aren't tons of comments about "Larry", even though Louis and Harry hardly interacted at all in later years. It doesn't matter. They might hug all the other boys and nobody cares, but if Louis accidentally brushes against Harry's foot in an interview, it's a "secret sign of their affection", a whole secret language, because the fans are convinced that their evil management purposefully kept them apart, so they can appear straight. Also Louis' girlfriends are all beards and his son either doesn't exist at all or isn't really his son (even though he looks like a mini version of Louis). And he and Harry are also secretly married, even though they probably have hardly seen each other since the band split.

I have no idea if Louis is a homophobe, but I know that the Larries are absolutely batshit crazy and enough to annoy the fuck out of the most patient person. They know no boundaries at all, they've harassed every girlfriend he had, sent death threats, threatened the mother of his son and the little boy himself, some of them even hacked into his mother's instagram account (when she was still alive) to post pictures of Harry with the caption, that he's her "son in law" and stuff like that. If he'd react allergic to normal "shipping" I'd side-eye him and ping him as an insecure homophobe, but this goes way beyond normal.

Gay insinuation often kills male friendships

Zayn doesn't look eating disordered to me, in terms of personality. I'm a former anorexic FWIW, and we tend to have a very solid profile - compulsive, perfectionistic, academic, people-pleasing. Out of the four, Zayn seems to fit that description the least.

R22: The Larries are crazy, but he did a lot of things to spread gay rumours, and he did it for a long time.

Some guys seem to have very funny acting gay but when the rumours spread is very difficult to stop them, and he reacted the worst possible way to the rumours.

It's like Shawn Mendes if you really hate the gay rumours about you the worst thing you can do is react all offended because you are giving all your haters a lot of amunition.

I know he suffered some loses (and his part on the story of my life video was very sad) but he seems a very unpleasant person.

And i think part of his problems with Harry is the fact that Harry avoided talking about his sexuality which of course doesn't help to stop the rumours

Didn't some of those crazy Larries go after Louis actress American now ex-girlfriend r22 and that it had allegedly played a factor in why they broke up?

R24 I have to admit I'm not aware of him spreading any gay rumours apart from the usual joking around on camera that all the boys did. But I didn't follow One Direction back then, so I might have missed it. I agree that his reaction made things worse, but I guess he was just overwhelmed. As Shawn Mendes example shows, a lot of them are and accidentally make matters even worse. And you could be very right about his problems with Harry.

I have to admit I'm very curious what exactly happened between them, because the change from their fast friendship to the avoidance in later years is very noticeable. And while I think stuff like avoiding public interaction to stop some of the rumors and growing up and being less close in general are factors, it doesn't explain why there was suddenly such a rift - even though I think The Sun's timeline is slightly off. I don't think the rift was at the same time as Harry moving out. Maybe there were already some cracks, but you can seem them interacting normally through 2012 and early 2013. I think Harry moving out had more to do with the fact that he turned 18. Larries always go on about the fact that he and Louis lived together in 2011, but afaik managment placed them all in a house, where there were four apartments and I guess it made sense that the put the youngest one together in an apartment with the only legal adult of the bunch. It probably also helped that they got along very well. But once everyone was of age, they bought their own places.

Anyway, I'd say about maybe late 2013 and certainly in 2014 it became evident that Harry and Louis weren't friends anymore. They all started to crack during that time, most noticeable Zayn, but I also think Liam's drinking became "toxic" (to use his own words) during that time.

R24 You must not forget that while Louis may have a certain street cleverness he came from a fairly "simple" background. He was born to a single teenage mum (who went on to have six more kids with two other men) and an alcoholic deadbeat dad, who liked talking to the yellow press once Louis became famous. I'm not sure if he finished school, but he once mentioned that for example he's never been to a zoo before the band. I don't really expect someone from that kind of background with so little life experience to know how to deal well with a crazy fandom and all the gay speculation.

Louis just tweeted about this Mirror article:

[quote]Biggest load of bullshit I’ve seen in a while. Typical unprovoked venom from The Mirror. Couldn’t be further from the truth!

Meanwhile (ironically) Harry seems to have forgotten or purposefully ignored that yesterday was the "9 year anniversary" of One Direction as he was the only one, who hasn't reacted in any way on social media to the anniversary or the trending hashtag.

What a bunch of dumb dumbs they all are. They could be making buckets of money lip syncing to their songs in concert but they're not.

Give it 10-15 years. By then if they're still alive they'll have likely spent their money and have ex-spouses and kids to support and be going back on tour.

All problems seem to lead to Louis so of course he's the one to complain about it.

R29 How are they dumb for not lip syncing? They are apparently able to sell stuff with their actual voices, so why not do that and avoid any pitfalls like Milli Vanilli?

They'll probably be back for a reunion tour in 10-15 years, but I guess it will be more about lost fame than money. They're worth about 60 million each, it's not like they'll be broke anytime soon if they don't watch it. Sure, you can squander away any amount of money, but if they are even little a bit sensible, they will be okay.

R26 You're right, the timeline is way off.

There are things in that article that are true, but there are some things that are crap.

So what really caused the breakup of Larry in what it seems happened overnight? I’m speculating they finally had sex? Then Louis realizing it’s not his cup of tea to Harry’s dismay?

This is why we still need Behind the Music.

I used to be entertained by all the behind the scenes stories of big bands and big feuds.

R34 I still hope someone with real knowledge will write a book.

R35 Who will though? Their crew won't because they'll be rehired if/when a reunion happens and it seems anyway that most people, who have come into contact with them got glamoured by Harry (the Guardian's attempt at investigative/critical journalism about One Direction comes to mind). It seems all our hopes rest on Zayn loosing it completely - including his fortune - or Eleanor splitting from Louis and writing some bitter revenge tell-all book.

R29: That's the most stupid thing i read today.

First they all are able to sing, they became famous on a show you have to sing live. Second, they are already millionaires so what's the point of doing something you don't want to do when you have more than enough money?

Most vocal groups and boybands end in fights, even the JOnas brothers had their own fights and they are brothers. OD were five kids with almost zero experience who didn't know each other before forming the band and then he became very big overnight. It's pretty clear that only a miracle could make their personal relationship works (even during a while it seemed they really liked each other)

Louis is the blond, right?

No, that's Niall.

All of them seem to like Niall

I never followed 1D, but reading the weirdness between Harry and Louis, is it possible Harry came out to or stated his attraction to Louis? That would change everything if one of them isn't into it, let alone one is homophobic. It can change everything between friends. It would seem to make a lot of things true, including Louis' response that the article's crap as well as no clear statement of what actually went wrong between the two guys.

I also think it's worth stating that many people have things that there's not enough money in the world for them to do. Based on what's been posted about Louis' family, the losses and his valuation of his wife/gf and son, reviving the Larry-insanity could endanger the things he values. If he's working class or ok with simplicity, he may prefer to live within his means on residuals rather than ever risk the things he does value for a buck. Or a pound sterling.

They each need to pose nude.

R40 I thought about that too at first. You're right that coming out or confessing feelings can unfortunately change a friendship like theirs. However upon further reflection I don't think it's that likely. I think it's safe to say that if anyone of the boys were gay, the others would know, because they lived in each other's pocket for five years. But it seems the problems were only between Louis and Harry, the others continued to banter and didn't really change their behaviour or attitude, not even Liam, who praised some homophobic guy for his "family values" on twitter. Case in point for continued shennanigans of the others: here's a video of the 2015 Billboard awards where Harry cheekily grabs Niall's crotch while hugging him (at 0:27). Maybe it's just me, but idk.... by all accounts Harry is usually a rather polite and mindful guy, so I somehow don't think there would be this kind of physical banter if there were any possibilty this could be sexual.

Apart from that, Louis was with Eleanor since late 2011, so I think if there were any unrequited feelings on Harry's part, this would have become a problem already back then. However they were totally fine for nearly two years into Louis' relationship. Therefore I truly think that anything regarding Larry is 100 % a figment of some fans' imaginations and whatever problem they had was unrelated to anything romantic/sexual.

I saw 1D in concert at the height of their fame and Niall and Liam were the most entertaining. At the time Zayn was my favourite but you could tell he didn't want to be there. He looked scared and you could tell his time with 1D was ticking.

They really did have some great songs by their third album. "Best Song Ever", "Story of My Life", "Night Changes".

R36 Maybe in a few years one of them might write a book. They might get tired of Harry putting off a reunion and decide to spill the dirt ?

Even though each of them has had a bit of solo success, some more that others, Niall, Louis and Liam all want to have the reunion. In one of his latest inter,views Louis said "it will happen but no one knows when." And if it doesn't he will have something to say about it.

It's obvious Harry will be the hold out but even he has said he would never rule it out.

Louis is a cunt. A miserable, bitter, little cunt.

Whose idea was it for them all to become overly tattooed freaks?

R46 Well, obviously Liam was drunk for most of his.

Is Niall still tattoo less?

R48 yes

Groovy

Liam has a nice ass.

Simon Cowell got some hot piece of ass from them guys.

Good for him then.

I'd love to make Harry my lil bitch. I don't know what happened, he always looked a bit like a joke with his babyface and huge mop of "windswept" hair. And then suddenly 2015 happened and he was grown up, had long hair and was hot.

R44 I'm positive the reunion will happen at some point. Harry will be the one to postpone it, even though Niall is doing pretty well right now too (afaik he's currently in the studio mixing his new album, so I guess he'll tour next year), and he might be the one to limit it to a single or an album without tour. But despite his lack of anniversary tweet he seemed comparatively fond of One Direction in general. More so than Liam, actually ("I used to be in 1D, now I'm out, free"). Liam was also the one, who said in some interview that they all need to be established as solo artists before any reunion can happen, which is a bit ironic considering that it doesn't look like his album is coming anytime soon.

So yeah, for sentimental reasons I can actually see Harry doing the reunion in 2023 or so. If he's going in the direction I hope he will (let's see if HS2 lives up to my expectations), I also don't think it will hurt him as a solo artists after 3 albums or so. He will be established by then. Unless his voice is trashed by then, the boy needs to work on his technique, because right now it seems he's destroying himself.

I have to admit I'm not opposed to a reunion. One Direction's music was never really my cup of tea, but I like the boys together, I like their interviews and all that. Even when things got less enthusiastic than the start, I always thought their personalities were a good and interesting mix. I also think they balanced each other out a bit, kept each other somewhat grounded, despite any possible quarrels. Liam seemed less like a douche, Harry less.. extra. I wonder if hanging out with all the Gucci people and show business divas is good for him.

Niall has said many times that he would drop everything to be back with One Direction. He has told his managers as soon as he gets the phone call, he's gone.

What seems unusual that all the guys get asked the reunion question a lot, but not Harry. It's almost like band questions are off limits for him.

Niall is a fat pig.

I know that artists sometimes have a list with off limit questions during press interviews, but I'm not sure band questions are actually on his. Because there are some interviews that ask both about his days in the band and a possible reunion. Also if he has this kind of list, then why isn't Taylor Swift on it, because talking about her has to get real old as well. Or maybe it's not so much a list, bur rather Jeff talking with the journalists beforehand on what they should focus?

But we have to keep in mind that Harry gets interviewed a lot by his friends, like Nick Grimshaw or James Corden, or at least people, he's friendly with, like Roman Kemp. Or even that French guy. He easily charms people and a lot of journalists mention how friendly he was and always introduced himself and such. So they all might make sure to focus more on his solo career as a courtesy and not pester him about One Direction. The Sun's Dan Wootton, who also did the "drugs, rivalry and hatred" story first, brought One Direction up during an interview and Harry's answer was non-committal as usual, certainly not as sure about it as the others (basically "I don't know, I'd never rule it out.").

So maybe interviewers are also not asking this question, because they know they'll never get a proper answer out of Harry. It's hard enough already to get him to say something about the stuff he actually wants to promote, it's basically impossible to ask him anything he doesn't really want to talk about.

R56 Yes, that's interesting. In general I feel Harry gets the more interesting and serious interviews. They often interview him like a normal musician, asking about his process for his album or his upcoming tour and such. The others often get more "fun" interviews with games, fan questions and 1D stuff. I don't know if it's because he seems more interesting to the media, since he was always the one they focused on, or if he just had the better PR campaign, also with the Behind the Album documentary and such. I guess him being the most successful solo guy also means that if a serious music magazine or show decides to interview one ex-1D-member, they'll choose Harry.

This is one of these more serious interviews for example. It's for an Italian radio show and it's astounding because nearly the full 10 minutes it's only about Harry's music, his approach to it and his album - there's one question about him living in London and visiting Italy before, but not a single question about his private life, random trivia or One Direction. I'm not as familiar with the other guys' interviews, so I don't know if they had similar interviews, but it's at least a marked deviation from the average One Direction interview.

(I'm also totally posting this, because I think what he wears is a really good look on him and I'd love for him to return to this kind of look instead of going full glittery, camp Gucci onesie)

R59 There is a picture of an "alleged" girlfriend wearing that shirt. lol

"Or maybe it's not so much a list, bur rather Jeff talking with the journalists beforehand on what they should focus?"

Oh, I'm sure that happens, a lot..0

R59 Here you go

“These gay sex rumors ARE TEARING US APART, “ he cried. His tears dripped into the Rice Krispies. He looked up, catching Harry’s big blue eyes. “Hold me,” he whispered.

R62 Yes, I know. I don't care (unless she kept that shirt), doesn't change the fact that the whole outfit he wore and his hair in that interview was a great look on him.

R64 I agree. Notice I said "alleged". PR at it's finest

R65 I don't know if she was ever his girlfriend, but I'm not buying the PR angle by now, if you mean that he or his management paraded Tess around so that people think he had a relationship with her. What's the point of having a PR gf around if there isn't a single photo of them together. Furthermore what's the point if Harry runs around stage every evening wearing the gayest clothes he could find and waving rainbow flags? I'm one of the admittedly few people, who don't even believe that he's gay or bi, but it seems clear to me he doesn't mind if people think he is. So the effort of having a beard, if that's what you meant, seems pointless.

If at least some of his past relationships were real, this Tess person would fit right in - leggy blonde with a pretty, but somewhat bland girl next door face.

R66 I have no clue why they do it, but they do it a lot. There aren't pictures of Harry and a lot of women he has been rumored to date.

R68 He basically just has to stand next to a woman (or a man) and there are rumours they possibly date - both during One Direction and now. If this comes all from his PR teams (both the old one and the new one) they are working overtime. Wasn't the latest rumour that he dates Kaia Gerber, even though she's one of his best friends' daughter and he has known her since she was a kid? And wasn't there some story that Kendall and Kaia are fighting over Harry or something? I doubt that's all some orchestrated PR effort. The papers just write whatever they hope will sell copies or generate clicks and it seems that whatever is about Harry Styles and his "love life" does so.

Well, all of them were in fake relationships during their OD days, so it's obvious some pr seem to think they are very useful (even some of them like the Taylor Swift show was obviously fake, not even in pictures they seem able to stand each other).

Harry simply seem smarter than the rest. I'm not talking about charisma (something he has and others like Louis not) i'm talking about knowing what he wants, and not overreact to stupid things.

I remember when he played some concerts in Spain and the treatment in the press was the same a serious artist would receive. They praised his profesionality, his fashion sense (not my cup of tea) or the fact that he did the album he wanted instead of looking for a radio friendly sound.

He barely got radio support, but it didn't matter

"Well, all of them were in fake relationships during their OD days, so it's obvious some pr seem to think they are very useful (even some of them like the Taylor Swift show was obviously fake, not even in pictures they seem able to stand each other)."

You're right.

R66 When we post that something may be PR driven, it's not to cover up gay, straight or bi. It's just a publicity seeking tool. I don't believe Harry was really dating Taylor Swift nor do I believe Niall dated Demi Lovato or Selena Gomez. But it got all sides a lot of publicity. Hollywood and fame is a lot of smoke and mirrors.

Zyan's about to embark on a new career as a movie star. The others will be REALLY jealous now.

Why? Harry was on an oscar nominated film and he even had good reviews of his performance

Wasn't there some statement years back that the others members of 1D tried to pressure Niall into getting a tattoo. When they decided to go to a tattoo shop after one of their concerts to get tattoos.

Zayn could be so huge

R75 He totally sabotaged his own career

A happier time.

.

The truth is really simple - Harry and Louis got into a romance and moved in together. Louis freaked out when people started calling him gay - Harry didn't give a shit. Liam was pissed because if Harry and Louis were fucking he might lose his co-lead vocalist spot. Zayan always thought he was a solo artist and decided when he got enough money out of 1D he would book it and he did (PS Zayan is at least Bi, there is video out there of him blowing a dude). When Zayan left, Simon freaked out that he was losing a cash cow so he upped their percentages, found Louis a girl to knock up so people would stop saying he was gay and set up Liam with Cheryl Cole to bang so he would be more high profile. It worked and kept the 4 together for one more album and tour (their tours were breaking money making records).

I wanna believe r79 but Idk who is this Zayan he keeps talking about.

This is still as insane as it always was. They have plenty of money and fame now. Walk away and don’t look back.

R81 They obviously don't want to walk away.

Well, I am.

R70 You're probably right about Haylor. But I have to admit I have a hard time telling which of Taylor's relationships are fake and which are real, because she's such a narcissist, every relationship of hers looks fake. And therefore possibly real? Idk, it's very confusing. They're at least all for PR. In general I think that nowadays there often isn't a clear difference between a fake relationship strictly for PR and a real one. I guess often people just hook up, because why not, and also decide that it's good PR for both of them to be seen together. Basically a business relationship with benefits.

Anyway, this doesn't have directly to do with Harry and whatever Haylor was, I think it was part of a learning process about PR and media. However I don't really get why Tess should be PR as well. She's a nobody and doesn't raise his profile like Taylor (or even certain VS models). It wasn't even good PR for her, because the obsessed fans usually slam any woman connected to him - either because they are jealous or because they want to defend Larry lol. I've read that Tess got trashed on social media to the point where she left and people suddenly posted tons of 1-star-reviews of her book.

By now most girls connected to Harry say they don't even know him (and vice versa), even though that's not true. I guess romance related PR just doesn't work very well in this fandom - maybe it will in some years, but not right now with the obsessed One Direction fans and Larries and whatnot.

R75 I agree, he has all the potential. Personally I'm not into his music, but he has a good voice, he always was the most handsome of One Direction and he had a certain advantage being the first to leave. His high profile relatonship with Gigi didn't hurt either. But it seems like he purposefully destroys everything that could make him successful.

R72 Zayn has said for years that he's interested in acting, but so far nothing seems to have happend. I don't know if it's because he never even really tried or if he isn't talented (not everyone is good at everything and I guess it might be more difficult for introverts like him), but it doesn't seem to happen in the near future. Especially not if he doesn't get himself sorted out.

R79 What kind of fanfiction is this? Zayan lmao. Also picturing Simon right now locking Louis and Brianna into a room and shouting they'd better make a baby in there and Louis tearfully crying that he can't fuck pussy, he needs Harry lol. This is too funny!

.........

The pic in the OP made me realise again how average they were. I can’t believe these were popular with teenagers.

Louis Tomlinson has slammed a report suggesting rumors he had sex with Harry Styles broke up One Direction.

The guys were in the boyband, formed on the X Factor in 2010, with Zayn Malik, Liam Payne and Niall Horan.

1D broke up in 2015, after Zayn left the band the year before.

This week, The Mirror brought the Harry/Louis rumor up again, writing that ‘One theory [for 1D’s split] was that the “Larry Stylinson” fan fiction depicting the pair as lovers had pushed them apart.’

The report then continued: ‘Louis, in particular, was extremely sensitive about the claims and admitted the speculation about their sexuality “created an atmosphere”.’

‘Couldn’t be further from the truth!”

Hitting back on Twitter, Louis wrote: ‘Biggest load of bullshit I’ve seen in a while.’

He then added: ‘Typical unprovoked venom from The Mirror. Couldn’t be further from the truth!’

Since leaving the band, Louis has served as an X Factor judge, while Harry has enjoyed a successful solo career in music.

He doth protest too much.

Louis slammed the whole article, which wasn't only about the gay rumours breaking them up like the piece in R89 makes it sound. The article in the Mirror basically rehashed Dan Wootton's story from the Sun a few years ago and mixed it with Louis' more recent interview with Dan Wootton, where he's on record saying that the Larry rumours made things difficult for his friendship with Harry.

R90 He can't win. If he doesn't say anything, the Larries insist it's true because he never denied it. If he denies it, people say he doth protest too much. At this point I'd probably pull a Harry if I were him, avoiding social media like the plague, never saying anything and staying purposefully vague about relationships and sexuality to make all the possible target audiences happy so they at least buy my stuff and keep me rich.

R84: That's because almost all Taylor's relationships are fake. If all his gay exes came out at the same time she would be very very embarrassed

R92: He can't win because he is a complete idiot. He overreact after every single stupid rumour about his sexuality. I remember he wearing an Apple T shirt, and someone on twitter thought he was supporting Tim Cook's coming out (yes, people made that kind of absurd connections, because Apple logo had those rainbow colors way before Tim Cook), it was ridiculous but totally harmless, and it didn't damage him at all, but he had to show how outraged he was online.

I think it wasn't the gay rumours what he can't stand, it was the fact that Harry couldn't care less about them. He probably wanted Harry to deny everything and saying the both are straight bros and Harry just didn't care.

And sorry, but if you are happy with your life and comfortable with your sexuality you don't react outraged every single time. He is a sad guy

" However I don't really get why Tess should be PR as well. She's a nobody and doesn't raise his profile"

She needed the publicity, not him.

R91 You're right. I don't think Louis liked any of the article. I thought Liam or Niall might make a comment, but they didn't.

Some of it was taken from other articles, but as Louis said the rest is bullshit.

Niall takes a swipe at Trump

R94: The low key beard is not that rare, but of course those types are only used to hide the homosexuality of one of the members of the couple instead of the usual publicity stunt.

And that not always goes well, just ask Jeremy Renner

Leave Jeremy alone

R98: Yes, better leave him alone, he has more than enough with what he had (karma is a bitch)

R97 Are we back to talking beards? Just when R77 said we aren't? And beards during One Direction days, sure, I guess it's a possibility, but as someone in this thread already pointed out: since Harry has gone solo, he's been busy waving rainbow flags and wearing the gayest clothes he can find. It doesn't make sense for him to have a beard these days, if he's actually gay.

Sorry, I meant R71 said we aren't talking beards, not R77

Harry isn’t gay. Bi, perhaps

I agree. I mean, he said he wasn't bi in an interview in 2013, so he might not even be that, but who knows. He might have experimented afterwards. Or he's just the kind of person, who is into everything and everyone on a coke high. But he's certainly not gay.

Wassup with DL only thinking of sexuality in binary straight or gay? It’s like DLers don’t know about bisexuality, mostly straights, or fluids

Anyone who dated Taylor Swift is homo guilty until proven otherwise.

I won't grow up! I don't wanna go to school. Just to learn to be a parrot, and recite a silly rule!

R106 ? Are you alright?

This doesn't look very gay to me. But I'm sure someone will always say it's PR and he's in the closet. I'd be happy to say let us gays keep our little fantasies about Harry, but unfortunately I think in this case it's rather some sad fangirl fraus, who so desperately want him to be gay.

R108 So, for the next 20 years those pictures of Harry will be brought up ? Got any current ones ?

R109 What's your point? Did Harry get bitten by the gay bug in the meantime or what? I don't think that's how it works...

But if you have any current photos of Harry making out with guys, please, I'd be quite happy to see them! For research....

EXactly

R110 The point is, do you have current photos? Also, no one said anything about Harry being gay or straight.

Also posting stupid shit and answering yourself is so pathetic.

R113 What are you talking about? I posted 110 and added 111 as addendum. I wasn't answering myself.

In case you didn't notice, the discussion was actually about Harry being gay or straight or bi or fluid whatever during the whole thread. It's even in the title and people have posted their opinion about it throughout this thread. The yacht photos were another contribution to the discussion that - whatever Harry is or isn't - he seems to be into girls at least.

But apparently you got triggered by this? I don't know why exactly and I also don't know what any of this has to do with "current photos". Is this your version of trolling? It's quite uninspired.

Same old troll.

Harry and Louis have fucked many times. You don't need to be a Larry to see it.

R114 you're annoying

R111: Oh come on, don't be stupid, there are tons of staged pics of gay actors from the years of bearding before coming out

But he’s not gay

R119: Maybe, but i doubt he is straight either

No one here knows Harry personally, no one. So we don't know what Harry likes.

Go Niall

Whatever. They suck. Their music sucks. Everything about them sucks and not in the way I like.

R123 Probably should skip over this thread dude.

R123 Someone's bitter lol. I mean, I get not liking One Direction's music. But after they split every member made music in very different genres, so if you say their music sucks in general, it just says that you don't know their solo music.

Niall should focus on Irish pollution and greenhouse gases if he really is interested.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Interesting.

Bump

Hasn't said in interviews he considers himself bi or sexually fluid?

R130 No, it's more of a Chinese whispers thing

In 2013 GQ did an interview with him, where they asked him if he was bisexual and he answered [quote]Bisexual? Me? I don't think so. I'm pretty sure I'm not.

And in 2017, after he launched his solo career, The Sun's Dan Wootton did an interview, where they talked about sexuality in pop after Miley Cyrus came out as pansexual. There he explained: [quote]“It’s weird for me — everyone should just be who they want to be. It’s tough to justify somebody having to answer to someone else about stuff like that.” So has Harry personally labelled his sexuality? He replies: “No, I’ve never felt the need to really. No.” Would he like to elaborate? “I don’t feel like it’s something I’ve ever felt like I have to explain about myself.”

Personally I think the quote is ambiguous at best, mostly expressing the fact, that he never had a problem or trouble with his own sexuality (whatever that might be) and that he's doesn't like when the people pester him about it (the whole "justify" stuff and "having to answer" and "have to explain"). Which is very understandable imho, considering that both the media and fans were crazy about Harry's alleged and real relationships, all the interviews questions about it, about his likes and dislikes, the whole conspiracy of (and questions about) him being secretly married to Louis and all that.

So to summarise: if we strictly take only what he said in interviews, then he's not bisexual and doesn't feel the need to label or explain himself.

Damn... can't format... so here's my post again with hopefully correct formatting:

[R130] No, it's more of a Chinese whispers thing

In 2013 GQ did an interview with him, where they asked him if he was bisexual and he answered

[quote]Bisexual? Me? I don't think so. I'm pretty sure I'm not.

And in 2017, after he launched his solo career, The Sun's Dan Wootton did an interview, where they talked about sexuality in pop after Miley Cyrus came out as pansexual. There he explained:

[quote]“It’s weird for me — everyone should just be who they want to be. It’s tough to justify somebody having to answer to someone else about stuff like that.” So has Harry personally labelled his sexuality? He replies: “No, I’ve never felt the need to really. No.” Would he like to elaborate? “I don’t feel like it’s something I’ve ever felt like I have to explain about myself.”

Personally I think the quote is ambiguous at best, mostly expressing the fact, that he never had a problem or trouble with his own sexuality (whatever that might be) and that he's doesn't like when the people pester him about it (the whole "justify" stuff and "having to answer" and "have to explain"). Which is very understandable imho, considering that both the media and fans were crazy about Harry's alleged and real relationships, all the interviews questions about it, about his likes and dislikes, the whole conspiracy of (and questions about) him being secretly married to Louis and all that.

So to summarise: if we strictly take only what he said in interviews, then he's not bisexual and doesn't feel the need to label or explain himself.

Harry likes pretending,,we just don't know what he's pretending.

I guess he's straight tbh... Some people, who know him personally have said he's straight and I don't think they had any reason to lie about it.

One was his good pal Xander some years ago, who got catfished by a crazy fan on snapchat. The fan posed as an old friend of Xander and flirted with him. She said she'll meet him, if he sets her (female) friend up with Harry, to which Xander replied "consider it done" and she asked "he's actually straight?" and he said "yes, straight". This convo caused a bit of outrage among the fans, because they said he was using Harry to get into some girl's pants.

The other one was Queer Eye's Karamo Brown, who hung out with Harry in Japan this year and recently called him "this straight guy" when telling a story about showing him Grindr. Contrary to Xander Karamo might have just assumed though and not necessarily know all about Harry's sexual orientation.

And then there are of course the paparazzi photos of him kissing models and Zayn's and Harry's leaked phone calls from the early One Direction days, where they instruct some excited groupie girls on how to get into their hotel room for some "booty".

Therefore my "verdict": straight guy playing around and arguably gaybaiting - although a lot of the gay "image" is just the fans assuming and fantasising and telling everyone what a gay/bi/gender fluid/whatever icon Harry is

Zayn is the most good looking one. Liam is the sexiest one. Harry is the classiest one.

So, he's in Cancun now ?

Niall is the hottest one

Niall is damn good looking !

They are all very handsome in their own way, which is not surprising since they as a band were the product of a casting process. They were all picked, because they have something special and appeal to different kinds of people. I actually always wonder if my "favourite" would be the same, if I had watched the X-Factor back then (and would have been the right age to fawn over a bunch of teenage boys). I really can't say...

R136 What's up with him travelling all the time? Do you reckon this is for work or vacation? Because he's just been chilling in Muskoka for a while, then wining and dining with some rich people in a luxury resort under the Sicilian sun... I doubt eating Italian cuisine with millionaires was so taxing that he needs another holiday after that lol. Jeff is with him too.

R139 I didn't even know that Google thing was over.

He has got to be tired of airline travel.

R140 I'm actually not sure if it's over, but since he arrived later (I think it began on the weekend and he arrived only on Monday), I always assumed he was just there for a day or two and not the whole length. Good for him tbh, because apart from being an excellent networking opportunity (and I hope he could use it as such) the whole Google camp stuff is a rather cringey.

Jeff's presence would indicate him travelling to Cancun being more than just vacation, but idk... Cancun is basically famous for being a vacation spot.

R141 I don't think Jeff ever leaves his side. Business or pleasure.

I'd still put hard money on both Harry and Louis being gay (at the very least, not straight). I actually do think there was something there in the early days between them, but it was over in the first couple years. It'll all come out in the wash give or take another decade or two.

Anytime I see these articles where the narrative is 'gay rumors ruined such and such' I LOL. Learned many, many years ago from old industry and PR pros that used to frequent Datalounge that that narrative is a key one used to cover up and squash the gay rumor mill.

R144 The true gay rumors or the made up gay rumors ?

R142 Yeah, I guess the fact that Harry is both Jeff's friend and his most important client makes them somewhat inseparable. Although Harry was alone in Muskoka, which was just for pleasure.

R146 Seriously, isn't he Jeff's only client ?

R147 No, Jeff or rather Full Stop Management have a whole bunch of clients, I'm sure.

Btw it could be that Harry Lambert is in Mexico as well (he posted some very catholic/Mexican looking photo of a cross on his instagram story) and Harry has been spotted on a set of some sort in what looks to me Gucci stuff. Could be a photo shoot or even video for his next single?

Fangirls on twitter are going gaga, because they think it's him shooting The Little Mermaid lol. It's kind of funny though, they've just seen Harry in the Gucci Mémoire ad, which is basically an hommage to 60s/70s pagan sex ritual cults, but all they really want is their beloved Prince Eric. And that's exactly why playing a Disney prince will be such a stupid career move.

R147 Oh sorry, you probably meant that Harry is Jeff's only responsibility within Full Stop Management, right? It seems so, but I've always assumed he plays a bigger role than just nanny for one client, considering that he's the owner's son. But I really don't know.

R149 Lol, nanny.

Does he have time to play a role in any other careers? He has been glued to Harry's side since they tried to sway him to sign with them back in 2013.

Yes, it seems so. I mean, I'm not complaining if it means that Harry gets all his time and the very best of his management skills. Although the fans seem divided if Jeff is actually a good manager or if Harry would do better with a different management. I'm undecided I have to admit, but that's also because I have no idea just how much influence Jeff has over Harry.

I guess after Modest, who I think were actually quite capable and knew what they were doing (contrary to people, who like to portray them as incompetent evil entities), but were still very demanding and controlling (of course, they were a bunch of teenagers), he's quite happy to have a manager, who is also a personal friend. He's also now in a position, where he probably has his pick of competent management companies, so it's not like he is kidnapped by Jeff and held against his will. Even though Jeff's father Irving is known to be a powerful, ruthless bastard, so it's definitely better to have him on your side instead of antagonising him.

I remember the same thing happening to the Bay City Rollers.

I'm not so sure it's good to have a friend as your manager. It would be very hard to fire him.

R153 That's true. It's difficult... on the one hand a friendly manager can be an asset, because he's more likely to actually listen to your wishes and might work his ass off to help your career. But if he becomes a problem for whatever reason, it's a way bigger problem than with just a normal manager. I guess it depends on how assertive and goal-oriented a person is, or if they are more of a pushover. I guess it remains to be seen in which category Harry falls.

Harry's on the move again.

How long before they shut this one down ?

They probably will sooner or later, but the "Favorite Member of One Direction, Post One Direction" thread is still open. Let's keep this one as back up, I'd say.

Why? This is not even a popular thread, and right now nobody is talking about that fanfiction relationship (who cares about Louis)

Carry on..

That was quick.

Good riddance. I'm glad they're gone. They fucked sucked. Average singers who look anorexic. No muscle to speak of. The best looking one is now an emaciated overly tattooed mess who wants a solo career but is afraid to perform in public.

Simon Cowell has really had a major hand in ruining pop music over the last 20 years. It was better when his reach was limited to shitty UK outputs in the 80s and 90s. Once he was given the greenlight on American Idol, ugh quality music went way downhill. He knows how to make fast money but he knows nothing about talent.

The older Harry gets the more simian he appears.

Lol One Direction might be done, but at least two former members are very successful in their solo careers and here to stay (and their looks don't seem to negatively impact their ability to sing). Sorry. The other three might make a comeback too, Zayn if he gets a grip on his problems and Liam & Louis if they finally release an album.

R160 I don't know anything about the NYC real estate market, except that it's fucking expensive. But is it normal that he lists his apartment for nearly the same price he bought it (reportedly $10.69 million)? I mean it has only been a year, I think, so wouldn't think the worth skyrocketed in the mean time, especially since we're already talking about the luxury segment. But so far his real estate deals haven't been extremely profitable, I think. His Bel Air house, which he bought for $3.1 million is listed for $3.2 million after it didn't sell for a year - which is to be expected since the LA real estate market is shit at the moment. And last year he put his Hertfordshire house on the market at a slight loss (for $4.3 million when he bout it for $4.4 million).

Where does he live right now? On his farm in Pennsylvania? It's probably quite peaceful, but somehow smacks of retirement from the music business.

Harry and Taylor swift need I say more. I think they are all gay and Simon tapped all those young think asses.

R164 Who cares? It's not like you'll ever get a chanc to tap their asses.

Harry spotted at the Ariana Grande concert. Singing, dancing and even smiling. He's turning the corner folks, he might get his personality back !

R166 I wasn't aware he lost it. He seems pretty intact so far.

Zayn used to be the most fuckable, but now he's too thin and drugged out looking

R167 Everyone has an opinion.

R165. I have no interest in tapping their asses.

Nice cover.

Hopefully no Cameron Crowe bullshit.

R171 he's too young to have all that crow's feet

R171 Oh yes..... I have to admit: it's absolutely not what I expected! But I love that he surprises me like that. I was fully prepared for a rather artsy, somewhat androgynous, very "aesthetic" photo. And then he goes the hunk route, all topless and smiley with a cover that promises "sex, psychedelics and the secrets of stardom". Holy shit.

And people go crazy over it, that cover has now over 170.000 likes on the Rolling Stone instagram page since they released it 5 hours ago, waaay more than any other pic/cover. So much for "being gone". It's also interesting that the Rolling Stone cover 2017 was (of course) still mentioning Harry's boy band roots, while this cover doesn't even mention it. I think with his new album era, he's not only far from being gone, he's also now really seen as a solo artist in his own right and I love that. Nothing at against 1D, but they on "hiatus" for nearly 4 years now and everyone is doing their own thing now and it's great that they are recognised for it.

I wonder if the Rolling Stone cover is any indication of how this album will look and sound. Because so far it seems that it could be more Medicine than Sweet Creature - which is a really wonderful song, but oh boy, I'm so here for something like Medicine. I'm actually so here for any new music and very intrigued right now.

" I was fully prepared for a rather artsy, somewhat androgynous, very "aesthetic" photo."

So glad it wasn't, that image was pure crap.

In the end magazine covers are still mostly the work of the magazine's creative director. While I'm sure there's some talk about the general direction beforehand (= basically Harry agreeing to the pitched ideas or not), it's still a reflection of what that creative director wants to do with Harry - both when it's artsy or like the RS cover.

It doesn't necessarily have much to do with his general image (past, present or future). I think in general he won't have changed a lot between the first and the second album. He might focus on slightly different fashion choices this time and it will be interesting what awaits us musically, but otherwise...

We know his management had a say in some part of it.

Which part?

R178 My point was, if a creative director suggested something way too out there, his management would probably have a say in it.

Oh, yes, I agree. That's why I wrote "basically Harry agreeing to the pitched ideas or not" and with "Harry" I meant of course him and his whole team, as they are probably on the same page - have to be, otherwise it would be difficult. (I'm not a subscriber to some fans' idea of management holding their artist basically hostage and forcing him to do whatever. Especially not any of the former 1D members, they are so famous and wealthy, they could handpick their management if they weren't happy with their management's choices.)

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I remember accurately predicting right here that Zayn would be that groups Beyonce long before he went solo. Too bad he didnt fix his brain issues first. Harry might build a decent career in that soft rock genre he's going for but he'll never play stadiums again. The others are following the prediction to a T. A few charting singles but ultimately forgettable. They would do well to go get hosting or judging gigs on variety shows while they still can.

R182 I honestly think times have changed for boy bands (and girl bands) nowadays. We are so used to the concept that only one of a group will make it and most of the time the one that leaves first. But times have changed with social media and I'm not sure this rule still applies.

If you think about it, back in the day the fans' only "access" to their favourite boy bands was through the actual music (albums, concerts) and traditional media like magazines and TV interviews. The fans were entirely dependent on this kind of information and if there was one "heartthrob" in the band, it was likely that you got more information about him than the others, which might have been more forgettable. It also means that once the musical output stopped due to hiatus or break up, newspapers and TV stations were far less likely to report about the former members (especially if there's nothing interesting/scandalous in their private life) as they couldn't be sure there would be demand for such reports.

With social media it's different. Each band member of 1D had the chance to communicate with fans directly through twitter and instagram, which gave the fans access to them independently from traditional media outlets. With between 20-30 million followers each, they can do a lot of PR themselves even if no newspaper or TV station wants to promote them after the break up - and that didn't happen, because these traditional media outlets see that the 1D members continue to have followers, likes etc., they see there's demand for them and continue to report about them in the old fashioned way as well. Additionally the rise of youtube channels, blogs, online magazines, podcasts, internet radios and other alternative media also means that you don't need a huge TV station to do interviews. There are a lot of opportunities to give interviews and be seen in many smaller things, that still spread like wildfire through the internet.

Because even the fans themselves are organised differently through the internet. Back in the day a few of your friends might have loved the same boy band, but they might not have continued to like them after a break up. So if you were all alone, you might have found something else too. However the internet allows for fans to connect around the globe and exchange their information and fan material. Websites like tumblr are filled with stuff that keeps the hype alive (photos, gifs, fan art, even their horrible fan fiction lol), even long after a band ended.

To summarise we basically have 3 factors nowadays, that didn't exist in for the boy bands of the 90s: 1) the members can communicate directly with their fans and do their own promotion 2) traditional and alternative media outlets continue to report about them 3) fandom culture got a huge boost through the internet and therefore potentially a different longevity

This means imho that it's far more likely that either all or most of the band members continue to have a career than it was for the boy bands before them. And this doesn't even factor in the possibility to restart any careers through a reunion.

It's still not a walk in the park and they'll all have to be clever about their careers, but I still think they all have an actual chance.

Liam is keeping busy.

R183 Except nothing in that changed landscape you describe has worked for any of them. *Regardless* of new media, the more time passes the more their individual core fanbases melt away. Scratch that. BECAUSE of new media, their individual fan bases melted away astonishingly fast. There's just way too much distraction available from new media to hold a boyband fanbase together for very long after a breakup. Don't forget also that their fans were predominantly kids. Kids who are maturing by the day and being pre-occupied with lifes grownup grind whether it's college, relationships or work. Later perhaps they'll develop a nostalgia for the group like the 90s boybands now have but right now the only emotion evoked is embarassment at ever being so twee. Also, the fact is that social media has made artists more forgettable, not less so. Unless an artist is perpetually memeable or constantly going viral, the only way I'm going to think to go to their social media is if they are still in the zeitgeist in some other way. These guys are clearly not on radars outside of their small core fanbases. Im sure their fans doubt this but that's because they're living in echo chambers. Harry's second and third singles didn't even chart in the US and were dismal even in the UK. That's a sign of the times (pun intended).

Also, I don't think Zayns initial success was down to leaving first. He just struck the right alchemy. i.e. High profile relationship and a music signature built around RnB sounds which immediately distinguished him from the groups sound and made him seem more grown up. He should have hired a therapist to follow him around all day and gone in hard with tours and promo. Muppet.

R183 Except nothing in that changed landscape you describe has worked for any of them. *Regardless* of new media, the more time passes the more their individual core fanbases melt away. Scratch that. BECAUSE of new media, their individual fan bases melted away astonishingly fast. There's just way too much distraction available from new media to hold a boyband fanbase together for very long after a breakup. Don't forget also that their fans were predominantly kids. Kids who are maturing by the day and being pre-occupied with lifes grownup grind whether it's college, relationships or work. Later perhaps they'll develop a nostalgia for the group like the 90s boybands now have but right now the only emotion evoked is embarassment at ever being so twee. Also, the fact is that social media has made artists more forgettable, not less so. Unless an artist is perpetually memeable or constantly going viral, the only way I'm going to think to go to their social media is if they are still in the zeitgeist in some other way. These guys are clearly not on radars outside of their small core fanbases. Im sure their fans doubt this but that's because they're living in echo chambers. Harry's second and third singles didn't even chart in the US and were dismal even in the UK. That's a sign of the times (pun intended).

Also, I don't think Zayns initial success was down to leaving first. He just struck the right alchemy. i.e. High profile relationship and a music signature built around RnB sounds which immediately distinguished him from the groups sound and made him seem more grown up. He should have hired a therapist to follow him around all day and gone in hard with tours and promo. Muppet.

R183 Except nothing in that changed landscape you describe has worked for any of them. *Regardless* of new media, the more time passes the more their individual core fanbases melt away. Scratch that. BECAUSE of new media, their individual fan bases melted away astonishingly fast. There's just way too much distraction available from new media to hold a boyband fanbase together for very long after a breakup. Don't forget also that their fans were predominantly kids. Kids who are maturing by the day and being pre-occupied with lifes grownup grind whether it's college, relationships or work. Later perhaps they'll develop a nostalgia for the group like the 90s boybands now have but right now the only emotion evoked is embarassment at ever being so twee. Also, the fact is that social media has made artists more forgettable, not less so. Unless an artist is perpetually memeable or constantly going viral, the only way I'm going to think to go to their social media is if they are still in the zeitgeist in some other way. These guys are clearly not on radars outside of their small core fanbases. Im sure their fans doubt this but that's because they're living in echo chambers. Harry's second and third singles didn't even chart in the US and were dismal even in the UK. That's a sign of the times (pun intended).

Also, I don't think Zayns initial success was down to leaving first. He just struck the right alchemy. i.e. High profile relationship and a music signature built around RnB sounds which immediately distinguished him from the groups sound and made him seem more grown up. He should have hired a therapist to follow him around all day and gone in hard with tours and promo. Muppet.

Zayn doesn't really want to work.

R187 You have a point about the distractions of social media and constant new emerging pop stars, that's certainly a threat to them. That's why I think they still have to be clever with their careers and either take good care of their core fan base or do something to gain new fans. But I don't think their fanbases have already melted. They all still have millions of twitter followers, I'd assume people, who aren't interested anymore would unfollow. And even Louis, who has promised everyone an album and a tour for years now (no shade, because he had it very tough in those years) as well as two summer singles we haven't heard of again, has just won a Teen Choice Award - only due to his maybe smaller, but still dedicated fans base. Will he and the others ever have the super stardom of their 1D days? Probably not, 1D were huge, but I think they still can have careers on a smaller scale. Maybe their individual success will vary, but I think there's potential for them to be solo artists, whereas for most 90s boy band members there was simply nothing after the band broke up.

I also think you might overestimate the whole embarrassment about 1D thing. From comments on the internet, I feel a lot of them are either still fans and have just grown up with the boys OR some of the nostalgia already kicked in, because they broke up at the right time, at the height of their fame and the fans have only good memories. I think it also helps that 1D was just a normal boy band and not that heavily branded with specific outfits or aesthetics. That's why they will never be My Chemical Romance levels of embarrassing. Plus people like Halsey (a known Harry stan - she wrote her first songs about him) have shown that it's okay to grow up and like/make different music, but still acknowledge that 1D was your life back then.

I feel the fact that those 1D anniversary tweets from the boys get hundreds of thousands of likes every year show that the core fanbase is still there.

R189 You're right, the fans are still strong.

R187 About Harry: His second and third singles had basically no promotion, which I think was a factor, but yeah, I think he's more of an album artist, like people in his genre. The album did very well and even re-entered the UK charts this week. I'm not even sure that singles success is such a good indicator - look at Liam for example, whose singles did extremely well, but his EP tanked a bit. And generally speaking I think that at the moment Harry is in a somewhat better position career wise than Liam. I mean, when Harry's Rolling Stone cover was revealed on Monday, it became the most liked pic on their instagram account ever. By far. A newspaper online shop in the UK had to take Rolling Stone out of their web shop because it was sold out after a day and they have to source more stock. And that's for a magazine that actually puts the whole interview online anyway. So I think the market is there and it will be interesting if he will be okay with his upcoming second album.

Apart from Harry I just wanted to say that I don't automatically equate a good music career with #1 chart success. There are plenty of musicians out there that don't chart extremely, but they still have a steady, good music career with a solid fan base. This is sometimes even better than high charting one hit wonders.

Sorry, I tend to leave out words today... this should say "I think he's more of an album artist, like most people in his genre" and "There are plenty of musicians out there that don't chart extremely high, but ..."

But record companies do like hits.

That's true. But if record companies would only sign artists with #1 hits, there would be a very small amount of signed artists left. Although I agree that the boys might have to shift to smaller labels, which are more specialised for certain genres, after some time.

So far they're all still with the labels they signed with and the only ones who might have problems with their label are Zayn and Louis, I think. We don't really know what happened with Zayn and Icarus Falls, if it's a matter of RCA fucking up or Zayn having personal problems, but I think it's clear that the whole rollout of Icarus Falls wasn't good. So maybe either the label or Zayn will "consciously uncouple" or not. We'll see. I guess it depends if Zayn is willing to give his music career another go or not.

And with Louis it's equally hard to tell what's the matter. Obviously he had a lot of tragedy going on in his life, so it's perfectly understandable if things are difficult on his side. But then he has always spoken about all the songs he has already written and also that he hopes to release his album or singles "soon", which was repeatedly postponed. We've also seen pictures of him in the studio, but heard nothing of the announced summer singles. So maybe it's Syco shelving his album and tour for whatever reasons. On the other hand an artist that isn't releasing anything isn't making his label money, so they'd be stupid not to release something from a former 1D member, who comes with an inbuilt fan base by default. Louis' material so far has been pretty diverse regarding musical genres, so maybe they can't agree on a sound and brand for him? However I'd think you'd agree on that before you sign the contract?

I'm actually very curious about the whole behind the scenes process of releasing music, but I honestly don't know enough about it.

Speaking about singles... Liam was supposed to release the single Ed Sheeran has written until the end of August, right? Does anyone know more about that? There's still time (9 days to be exact), but I'd thought he'd announce a release date it by now. Is he really going to surprise drop it?

It's also curious that the Sun article R184 linked doesn't mentione it. Usually they mention upcoming music in articles, even if it's mainly about the TV show.

You're right. Nothing has been mentioned about his music. That's interesting.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Oh Liam.

"The former One Direction star, 25, posted a photo of his abs on his Instagram story as he relaxed in bed" - that's one way to say he was grabbing his dick. :D

Oh Liam indeed, although I think it's actually quite funny and the photo is still comparatively harmless. Which makes me even more suspicious if this is truly an accident. I mean, we can't deny that it landed him in the papers and if that new single is really coming out within the next week, it won't hurt to remind the general public that he still exists.

I just feel he didn't think of that Insta girl boasting that he liked her nudes, because together those two stories make him look rather horny lol. But maybe that's on brand, his biggest hit was "Strip it Down", I think, which is a horny song too. The new single's title is "Stack it Up" right? So we've got the sex and the drugs. Next hit will be about rock n' roll?

I wonder if Liam is drinking heavily again?

Because of the thirst photo?? Doubt it. It seems his drinking was more a reaction to the immense stress that 1D touring & press brought, basically a little help to be the happy, jolly boybander everyone expected. Nowadays he doesn't really have an intense schedule or anything and due to the general image change of all the 1D boys (they all grew up and have a more serious image now) there's also no need for the constant cheerfulness.

Back in 1D you could also see that he was at times somewhat chubbier, probably from drinking, nowadays he seems in great form.

Well, we've all done some pretty stupid things when drunk. So, I'm assuming he was.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Harry and his sister

They look great! I'm not always a fan of Harry's fashion choices, but this outfit looks lovely.

I guess his Rolling Stone interview will be online this week, right? Can't wait to read it, I hope we'll get a date for his new music.

R205 Will it ?

R205 Just read it. Interesting.

Wow... the Rolling Stone interview is certainly not anything I expected. I'm kind of still processing tbh. It will be interesting how the public will receive it, I guess.

The photos are incredible btw, he looks like a snack.

R208 They are taking a very different direction with him and his PR. I think they finally realized the brooding, loner approach wasn't working.

Bumpn

R189 Unfollowing people requires effort and therefore some type of emotion to serve as impetus. If people are indifferent, they'll passively skim you in their feed. The best place to see that following or subscribing doesn't translate to actual engagement is YouTube where you have creators with 5 million plus subscribers but can't get views over 200,000. And already know how useless those1D followers are by all the boys record sales including Harry. Less that a tenth of those followers bought his second and third single, for godsakes.

I still think they a good number of fans.

Omega

Link to the RS interview

R209 I don't know what about writing an album about "sex and sadness" and spending his 25th birthday all alone in a café in Tokyo doesn't spell brooding loner. The RS interview makes him seem like the only time he isn't brooding and alone is when he's high on drugs recording or partying on the beach without recollection of it afterwards. He changed so much in the last 2-3 years. It's to be expected, because he's still so young, but you'd expect that he just grows up and not change his core personality, sadly. Maybe that's his "real" self (although he'd be an incredible actor, if everything before late 2017 was a publicity lie), maybe he's now surrounded by the wrong people, but it's very disappointing for me.

R215 He spent his 25th birthday singing with the Queer Eye guys in a Karaoke bar. So, they might be fibbing a bit.

Harry's playlist

R216 There are some blurry fan photos from that day in Tokyo, where he seems to be alone (and wearing different clothes than during his evening at the karaoke bar, so it's probably earlier in the day). And the karaoke bar thing was unplanned according to Bobby from Queer Eye and basically sounds like lonely Harry just messaged Kiko, who he didn't personally know at the time, because he was looking for people to spend time with:

[quote]They started following each other, and commented on each other’s Instagram, and once the tabloids picked it up, they were like “Harry and Kiko are dating”! But they had never met each other, and then they started DMing and talking. And he was in Japan, and her and I were hanging out at a friend’s house. And he messages “Hey, what are you guys doing?” And she was like “Hey, we’re just chilling at a friend’s house, like come over”, and then Harry came over and we went out for karaoke.’

Of course I don't know how truthful all these stories are, but Harry's whole Japan travels seem slightly bizarre to me. He was there for quite some time, returning multiple times in late 2018/early 2019, always travelling alone and he seemed to hardly know anyone there. He spent holidays like New Year's eve and his own birthday there instead of with his family or some old friends... I don't know, it always seemed a bit weird to me and considering that we now know that this was around the time he got deep into psychedelics, I hope he's fine tbh.

R218 The whole Japan thing was really strange.

Another interesting take on the Rolling Stone article.

R218 I really hope for him he wasn't alone in Tokyo on his 25th birthday. Because that Japanese fan, who met him, said she saw a man wearing a birthday hat and took notice because she thought someone's birthday is on the same day as Harry Styles's - until she noticed it WAS Harry Styles wearing that birthday hat. She went up to him, talked a bit to him and said he talked very slowly, "maybe he was drunk." Honestly, sitting alone somewhere in Tokyo with a birthday hat and being "drunk" (or under whatever other influence), holy shit, that's not a good look, that's sounds somewhat deranged...

R220 It's indeed an interesting take on the RS article and if it's really that carefully curated and planned, it would actually make me like that article (and him) more. Because that's clever and I like clever people - definitely more than just people, who tell somewhat stupid stories about gory drug accidents.

But unfortunately they might be reaching a bit. I don't have enough insight in Larrie minds, but is just mentioning Joni Mitchell's Blue really enough? After a huge part of the article is about his ex-girlfriend? And I don't really see in the Casamigos tequila a "plug" on Harry's part - Harry's been known to like tequila (he also drank it during the night in Bangkok in 2105, after he fought with Zayn) and he's friends with Rande. Of course he'd rather buy his friend's tequila brand than any other brand, if it's available. The fact that Rob mentions it, sure, that's of course a hint to that friendship, like any journalist would probably do.

Harry talking about 1D is always a bit of a dance around the subject, but imho it's rather clear: Rob asked if he's friends with the others and after the initial "sure", he says it's more about them going through the experience together, but they aren't best friends, they aren't close and he even compares them to Fleetwood Mac - I don't know much about Fleetwood Mac, except that they fought A LOT over the years and Stevie Nicks kicked Lindsey Buckingham out of the band last year amidst a lot of bitterness and accusations, followed by a lawsuit. How anyone could read into this statement that he and the other guys are "like brothers" is beyond me tbh.

I also don't understand how stating that he wrote all his new music while he was super high is supposed to attract a new fan base, but I freely admit that might just be me not understanding the coolness of it. The RS article got a lot of positive response, so there might be something to that.

R222 "I also don't understand how stating that he wrote all his new music while he was super high is supposed to attract a new fan base, but I freely admit that might just be me not understanding the coolness of it."

A 24 year old female friend read about how he wrote his songs and the drugs and her response was "well that doesn't seem authentic".

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Oh no, no no

I can't look

lol what even is this haircut? His face looks handsome as always and there are pictures of him, where he wears a snapback and looks really hot. But his new haircut looks like he took some paper scissors and cut it himself while he was high. Even apart from the style (which is debatable) it just... doesn't look like a professional haircut to me? He's a millionaire, why does it look like he wears a toupee?

R227 I just can't look closely at it.

I know gossip sites minus this one are to be taken with a grain of salt, but according to CDAN, Harry has had anal rejuvenation and is on PrEP. I find that to be hilarious even though it's most likely untrue. Also, there's a user on there named Tricia who's always the first to reply to every blind. Talk about no life.

R229 I saw that on a blind gossip site also. Very strange.

It's a blind that just speaks about a "foreign ex-boy band member", who leaves a number of possibilities open. There wasn't anything specifically about Harry, but yeah, it's extremly unlikely that there is ANY truth to the blind, no matter if it's about Harry or not. The very same site also wrote that Paul Walker didn't die in his car accident in 2013, but just faked his death in order to escape bad press for his young girlfriends. And his very own daughter believes he's dead too, when he's living incognito somewhere.

I think that says enough about the reliability of this site.

(Apart from that: Harry is 25. Even if he's gay and whoring around like there's no tomorrow, which is unlikely, since he was in a committed relationship with a female model until last year, I doubt he'd need anal rejuvenation at his age.)

Just no.

Maybe it's not real, the texture in the pictures looks odd.

R233 I agree, the cut looks amateurish and the texture like a bad hairpiece. However he was on a vacation (he told that a fan asking for a photo) in Italy - why would you wear a hairpiece/wig during your down time in a hot country? It's all very... mysterious.

Anyway, I hope whatever atrocious thing he has done to his hair, he will have grown it back when promo for his new music starts.

R234 I was assuming he was in Italy for Gucci and they did that to him !

R235 If that's Gucci's idea of making Harry look good, they have lost the plot completely.

R236 That was gone a long time ago. Look at the clothes.

PR is getting heavy

I'm not mad....

He has a mixture of River Phoenix and young Johnny Depp vibe in this photo. Very 90s. It's a nice deviation from his 70s obsession tbh.

Looking good.

The other thread got closed, I think...

Great pictures.

From Louis interview:

"While promoting his upcoming single, Kill My Mind, Louis shared with Planet Radio, "I saw Niall at Glastonbury. I've not seen Harry for a while but I've been in contact with him, you know, recently so - it's proper nice. Proper nice." Furthermore, Tomlinson confessed that he wished Liam on his birthday, (August 29) a day after, as he was really busy. However, it's Payne that Louis has remained most in touch with over jet-lagged phone conversations between the two close friends."

That's nice to hear! I kind of suspect that the "in contact" with Harry was mostly to discuss single release dates tbh.

It's pure speculation, but it feels to me like Louis changed his schedule a bit, because he wanted to get out his single before his Madrid festival gig, where he will play a lot of new songs. So he rushed it a bit (his music video was shot only last week, I think?), to have at least one new song out there, that fans can hear in proper quality and not as a phone recorded festival performance . Harry on the other hand has that new album basically finished since January, had a private listening party with Stevie Nicks in June and the music video was shot in early August. His single could basically come out any time now. So I guess the guys (all of them - not only Harry and Louis) contact each other when they release something to make sure they don't release too close to each other and ruin each other's press coverage and chart positions.

My theory (or rather hope) is that Harry's single will come out on 13th September, unless he's superstitious, then it might be the 21th September. I feel these are the best dates, because otherwise it's too close to Niall's new single imho.

(But I do wonder why they really have to release everything in the span of a month lol. Talk about sending the 1D fans into a frenzy.)

I guess Niall is getting in on the action.

The former One Direction singer hosted an intimate album playback session at The Electric Room in London on Thursday evening, where he played four tracks from his second LP.

I wonder if there will be any photos of 1D members at Ed Sheeran's belated wedding reception?

I wonder too, but I doubt it tbh. Nothing leaked so far and the dailymail, who usually has all the photos first, doesn't have anything either. Afaik both Harry and Niall attended.

When did Niall become such good friends with Sam Smith?

R249 There's a photo of him in an ugly Christmas sweater with Olly Murs, Demi Lovato and Sam Smith from back in 2014, I think. So I guess they've at least been acquaintances for a while. But they're also both with Capitol Records, I think and Niall's new single is coming out soon.

The big gossip is that Scooter Braun and Taylor Swift will be there. Yawn.

I would rather hear about just about anyone else.

Happy Birthday Niall.

Liam sang Happy Birthday to him during his gig in Madrid. That was nice, especially after he admitted both he and Louis forgot about Niall's birthday lol. It fits with that recent interview, in which Louis said he forgot about Liam's birthday, so he texted him the next day or something like that. It seems all of them aren't terribly close these days (something 1D finds apparently find hard to accept), but on friendly terms.

Looks good

He looks really good! The pink suits him. But that shirt is extremely 2015 Harry tbh. Didn't he wear the same or an extremely similar one back then? I don't know Glass magazine, so no idea if it's a fashion magazine, but if so, I wish the stylist would have chosen somethings more individual for Niall.

R255 The Glass Magazine Cultural cocktail of high fashion, luxury travel, fine arts and humanities from around the globe, served to you daily by GLASS magazine #GLASSmagazine bit.ly/2IB9nCG

who knew ?

Hmmm I never really payed attention to Niall but she cute!!

Madrid

This is what set the fan girls on fire.

I hope Liam is doing okay. He hasn't looked well lately.

How many of these the troll get shut down?

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.

Larries will always be a discussion point on any 1d thread, but I've noticed before that someone here is very sensitive about it, and gets angry when Larries are criticised.