He claims hatefulness is part of gay culture: to silence it is to be homophobic.
Hateful Rich Juzwiak defends hateful Dale Peck for his hateful takedown of Pete Buttigieg in The New Repiublic
by Anonymous | reply 76 | July 23, 2019 4:50 PM |
She's not wrong, you cunt.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | July 16, 2019 3:40 PM |
Well, he should be happy that the hackfest, Jezebel, isn't silencing him. Of course he'll never write for any legitimate publication.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | July 16, 2019 3:41 PM |
He's the worst and just about every reader of Jezebel hates him, and they have for years. That site has no editorial oversight anymore, which is why they publish his drivel.
I feel so embarrassed on his behalf, airing his middle age crisis like that for all to see. Tired-ass whore.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | July 16, 2019 3:46 PM |
I always wonder how he feeds himself--being a hack journalist can't be renumerative.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | July 16, 2019 3:47 PM |
He's probably a kept lady.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | July 16, 2019 3:55 PM |
Chasten is a kept lady too.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | July 16, 2019 3:56 PM |
if the authors argument is that it is perfectly acceptable and fine for gay men to say the kind of things that were said in the original article then that is fine. But we should stop being hypocrites when straight men say similar things about women. If we wccept that part of gay culture is this kind of language then we should also accept trumps locker room talk as just part of straight culture and dismiss it. (Which by the way a majority of voters did)
by Anonymous | reply 7 | July 16, 2019 3:57 PM |
Agree with R7. If we expect more and hope for better, we need to hold ourselves to similar standards. Or complain less.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | July 16, 2019 3:59 PM |
Someone on the Dale Peck thread called Juzwiak an "Auntie Tom" and I snorted loudly.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | July 16, 2019 3:59 PM |
Chasten is not kept. He was a teacher but may have changed if he's campaigning.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | July 16, 2019 4:06 PM |
I meant that Rich is kept, not Chasten.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | July 16, 2019 4:10 PM |
The word is “remunerative,” r4. Not “renumerative.”
by Anonymous | reply 12 | July 16, 2019 4:16 PM |
^ Mary Pete
by Anonymous | reply 13 | July 16, 2019 4:18 PM |
Ugh--who would keep Rich Juzwiak?
by Anonymous | reply 14 | July 16, 2019 4:22 PM |
I remember when Juzwiak was at "Gawker" and all his posts were about all the sex he'd had.
He's not THAT hot.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | July 16, 2019 4:25 PM |
Yeah, Rick should go back to writing hot takes of jackoff parties.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | July 16, 2019 4:34 PM |
I remember first coming out in the '70's , bitchy and snarky were de riguer and was just part of the culture. We had to sometimes edit ourselves when in more "polite" company,. sometimes unsuccessfully
by Anonymous | reply 18 | July 16, 2019 5:07 PM |
The writers at Jezebel all feel that their only job is to write coulmns that will get attention, which means writing something that's either wrong, or contrary, or stupid -- in this case, Juzwiak has hit the trifecta.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | July 16, 2019 5:11 PM |
Dale Peck isn't really old enough to have been part of the gay Boomer mandatory bitchiness crowd, is he? I'm 47 and it was over and done with by the time I was a late teen, and he's only 5 years older than me.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | July 16, 2019 5:14 PM |
Another defense of the article by a gay Democratic Socialist that hates Pete with a passion per his Twitter feed.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | July 16, 2019 5:17 PM |
r21 Daniel is almost as bad at Rich when it comes to being an online asshole...
by Anonymous | reply 22 | July 16, 2019 11:36 PM |
I really didn't think Pete would face the amount of homophobia he is facing. I didn't think America was still this bad.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | July 17, 2019 2:10 AM |
Hack cunts who write articles like this overanalyze everything and are actually jealous of Mayor Pete. If they ran for President no one would take them seriously and would ultimately laugh at them. The joke's on them.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | July 17, 2019 2:19 AM |
And from other gay people, R23! Pathetic.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | July 17, 2019 2:20 AM |
r23 I'm more dissapointed in the hate he gets from certain quarters of the LGBT collective - I expected crap from the usual suspects but the vitriol certain gay men surprised me (though in retrospect I should have seen it coming). The Gay Bernie Bros have lived up to expectations - similar to how they savaged Clinton and her supporters - but the weird obsession with his sex life and the odd echos of the standard religious right tropes was shocking. Of course, they give cover to the straight Bernie stans to just absolve themselves of any homophobia so if anyone is a gay uncle tom, it is the Dale Pecks and not Pete.u
I just hope the hardcore Bernie supporters don't sabotage the ultimate democratic nominee if Bernie loses but I don't have high expectations...
by Anonymous | reply 26 | July 17, 2019 2:27 AM |
FYI - Rich's sex advice column at Slate is exactly what anyone who knew his writing would expect - he manages to work himself and his sexual exploits into every response.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | July 17, 2019 2:30 AM |
R23, wake up!
If you think this is bad wait til he gets the nomination!
Not sure why it seems these days there’s so many posters on here who are shocked that there are mean people in this world. People are having breakdowns over Buttigieg getting called Mary. How will it be once deplorables become afraid of him and get nasty?
by Anonymous | reply 28 | July 17, 2019 3:45 AM |
[quote]He claims hatefulness is part of gay culture:
Obviously browses DL.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | July 17, 2019 3:50 AM |
Sexual exploits r27? How old is rich
by Anonymous | reply 30 | July 18, 2019 3:31 PM |
Is Rich still in love with the straight bro from Gawker? I think AJ something?
by Anonymous | reply 31 | July 18, 2019 4:24 PM |
Nice sophistry R26 -- taking a hate-on-Pete piece that does not once mention Bernie Sanders or any other politician and turning it into a whine fest about how the mean BernieBros (on Twitter, no less!) were mean to Hillary and how this is EXACTLY LIKE the way they were mean to your HillsyWillsy.
Only it's nothing like it.
Not even a little.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | July 18, 2019 4:32 PM |
r32 No my point was that the hardcore gay male Pete haters (on twitter anyway) all seem to be Bernie supporters - that isn't surprising and not sure why pointing that out is "sophistry"
by Anonymous | reply 33 | July 18, 2019 4:46 PM |
I'm a hardcorePete supporter and I've never been a Bernie supporter. I was a hadrcore Hillary supporter in the last election.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | July 18, 2019 4:48 PM |
Rich Juzwiak looks like a Mongoloid. The only reason he gets sex at all is because he lives in Manhattan and works out some.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | July 18, 2019 4:54 PM |
r34 Well the twitter mean gays would denounce you as a neoliberal assimilationist because...Bernie. The only candidate they will even consider is the self avowed democratic socialist (even though he is really just a New Deal Liberal like Roosevelt who wants to reform capitalism without abolishing private property and expropriating the means of production but the Jacobin crowd just ignores that) - even Warren falls short because she committed the unpardonable sin of proclaiming herself to be a capitalist!
by Anonymous | reply 36 | July 18, 2019 4:58 PM |
I really don't give a shit what "mean twitter gays" say, to be quite honest.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | July 18, 2019 5:03 PM |
Most of the Twitter Mean Gays™ are anti-Bernie. At least as far as I've seen. The gays that support him like Glen Greenwald are not part of the the politics gays clique.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | July 18, 2019 5:04 PM |
[quote]hatefulness is part of gay culture
So is meth. I’m proud of gay culture generally, but let’s not pretend that everything about it is beyond reproach.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | July 18, 2019 5:22 PM |
Wrong thread--my bad
by Anonymous | reply 40 | July 18, 2019 5:35 PM |
The only thing that has ever been remotely interesting about Rich was his then-boyfriend's cat Winston. The fact that he works for Jezebel pretty much sums up his lack of value and talent.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | July 18, 2019 5:39 PM |
Dale Peck's original piece was had a definite pro-Bernie bias insofar as the criticisms he leveled at Pete (vague as they were, apart from the ad hominems) could be leveled at any other major Democratic candidate BESIDES Bernie (e.g. "he supports 'healthy capitalism'").
Btw I liked Rich Juzwiak's column in Gawker "The Best Restaurant in New York Is..." It was funny. He wrote it with a woman writer whose name I forget. God damn you, Peter Thiel!
by Anonymous | reply 42 | July 18, 2019 5:46 PM |
R42, it was Caity Weaver. That name came to me out of nowhere.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | July 18, 2019 6:00 PM |
The hysterical reaction to this article is worse than the article itself. Calm down. They took the bad man’s article down. It can’t hurt you anymore.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | July 18, 2019 7:18 PM |
The hysterical reaction to this article is worse than the article itself. Calm down. They took the bad man’s article down. It can’t hurt you anymore.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | July 18, 2019 7:18 PM |
What Peck did was tell straight readers that it was ok to be uncomfortable with Buttigieg because he is gay—in fact, he confirmed that it was ok to distrust Buttigieg and not vote for him because he is gay. It’s perfectly fair, indeed necessary, to criticize him for doing that.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | July 18, 2019 8:22 PM |
At Gawker, Caity Weaver was hilarious, and so was Brian Moylan. Rich Juzwiak was never funny or insightful. I can't believe that he and that cow Lindy West have been able to sustain themselves as writers.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | July 18, 2019 8:25 PM |
Lol at r46, so sad!!
He reminds me of those self loathing gays who are always obsessed with straight people and think that homophobia exists because a gay wire assless chaps to a pride parade!
Listen dummy, most straight people could care less about what Peck thinks. They don’t even know he’s alive! If they met him on the street, they’d have no idea who he is. So your theory that Peck is the reason homophobia exists points to you being an idiot.
Also, I suggest you hide in a hole for the next decade. If you’re crying like a baby over this article, you’re in for a world of hurt if Buttigieg actually gets the nomination.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | July 18, 2019 8:51 PM |
No r48 we don't nees to axxept homophobia ever from any source.
If YOU don't care if people respext you, that's fine. No one will force you to feel otherwise. But you look dumb telling us what our threshold for homophobia has to be
by Anonymous | reply 49 | July 18, 2019 8:53 PM |
R47 which is why they are still stuck at what's left of Gawker Media and haven't moved on like all the good writers did from there.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | July 18, 2019 9:32 PM |
r50 Is that his boyfriend?
by Anonymous | reply 52 | July 18, 2019 9:33 PM |
Thanks, R43.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | July 18, 2019 9:37 PM |
R49, we?
How many personalities do you have? My post was directed at one person.
Please take your meds before you have a heart attack.
WE care about you!
by Anonymous | reply 54 | July 18, 2019 9:49 PM |
I'm sorry but did r49 intentionally type "axxept"?
by Anonymous | reply 55 | July 18, 2019 10:10 PM |
No r55 I switched my keyboard to one that has japanese characters available but all the english keys moved slightly and Ive gotten so frustrated with spell checking everything I type I just don't do it sometimes lol
by Anonymous | reply 56 | July 18, 2019 10:24 PM |
[quote] Ive gotten so frustrated with spell checking everything I type I just don't do it sometimes lol
so I've blocked you lol
by Anonymous | reply 57 | July 19, 2019 12:34 AM |
r50 2 year boyfriend? How very heteronormative...
by Anonymous | reply 58 | July 19, 2019 12:45 AM |
I don't know what we do with this. So Mayor Pete is gay, but not queer? Okay. That's fine. So he's too far right to vote for? Okay, that's fine too, you are not obligated. So he reminds Dale Peck of some fat bitch that dared to hit on him while liking the New Yorker, lo those many years ago? Okay, that's fine too.
What is this nonsense? Did anyone think that the first Gay presidential candidate with anything like a serious shot at winning even a nomination wouldn't be a heteronormative assimilationist, as opposed to being something grown in a lab by a couple of Queer Studies majors? Check and check.
And Rich Juzwiak would like us to know this is all okay because it comes out of a rich tradition of gay men reading each other to filth? Well, that's fine too. What does it all mean, pretty much nothing.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | July 19, 2019 1:31 AM |
...and then Juzwiak will tell us all about the time he fucked Tigger at Disneyworld... and fucked a cater waiter at a wedding ... and that guy on the camping trip with his family.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | July 19, 2019 12:15 PM |
I loved the takedown, it stands on it's own and needs no defense.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | July 19, 2019 3:19 PM |
R61 = Dale Peck
by Anonymous | reply 62 | July 19, 2019 3:41 PM |
R57 has STATED HER BOUNDARIES.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | July 19, 2019 4:55 PM |
r63 you forgot the lol lol
by Anonymous | reply 64 | July 19, 2019 6:01 PM |
"it stands on it's own.."
Oh, dear.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | July 20, 2019 12:05 AM |
That article is 2,317 words long.
Millennials like me don't have time for that.
by Anonymous | reply 66 | July 21, 2019 12:17 AM |
r66 I'm not sure why he is paid at all - Jezebel is now owned indirectly by Univision and has been laying people off by the dozens at the former Gawker properties it bought a few years ago. Rich must be cheap...
by Anonymous | reply 67 | July 21, 2019 11:47 PM |
I can't waste my time for 2000 words of verbiage.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | July 22, 2019 12:07 AM |
r67 *snickers nastily*
by Anonymous | reply 69 | July 22, 2019 12:07 AM |
R60 = gay incel.
by Anonymous | reply 70 | July 22, 2019 4:53 PM |
Absolutely right. Why waste time reading 2000 words about a topic in order to understand what it means (and I'm not using Peck's article as an example; I'm speaking generally) when you can zip through 150 words on your phone which do Nothing to explain the topics, while you're walking down the street getting in people's way and being a nuisance. Better yet, zip through those useless 150 words while you're driving!! Hopefully Darwinism will prevail.
by Anonymous | reply 71 | July 22, 2019 5:13 PM |
Wow, r71. You sure do smell like Preparation H.
by Anonymous | reply 72 | July 22, 2019 5:16 PM |
I want a sassy DLer to do a quick summary rather than plough through this periphrastic, Pulitzer-hungry Juwzsiack.
by Anonymous | reply 73 | July 22, 2019 9:30 PM |
Hello, Rich at r70!
by Anonymous | reply 74 | July 22, 2019 9:32 PM |
Hello, Peter La Barbera at R74!
by Anonymous | reply 75 | July 23, 2019 3:55 PM |