Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Kate Middleton & Prince William’s Early Years Were Not A Fairytale

Back in April, we were all minding our business and waiting for Meghan Markle to give birth to baby Archie when the royal scandal of 2019 hit the internet. These cheating rumors have led us to reflect on Kate Middleton and Prince William’s dating history. It’s actually as complicated and nuanced as you’d expect any long-term relationship to be–there are no exceptions for royals.

Out of nowhere, the world was nearly set aflame when unconfirmed reports claimed that the prince had cheated on his wife with her good friend, Rose Hanbury. Neither party has commented on the tabloid rumors, and it looks like someone made them up to stir up trouble. However, it did reveal that even royals don’t have fairytale romances.Kate Middleton and Prince William met way back in 2001 when they were both students at St. Andrews University. Their romance would be an on-again, off-again saga until they finally wed in 2011. Now, royal biographer Andrew Morton, who wrote the book, William and Catherine claims that a lot of the friction in the Cambridges’ relationship was due to the future Crowned King’s treatment of the duchess. Morton boldly suggests that William treated his then-girlfriend, “like a servant.”

Though we’d take anything one person says about a mega-famous couple with a grain of salt–Morton isn’t the only one who observed the prince’s flippant behavior toward Kate during their dating years. Michael Choong, a university friend of the couple, told The Express that the prince would often act like the duchess wasn’t there, blatantly ignoring her to have conversations with other people. He explained, Prince William “could be flip and curt” with Kate. “He expected Kate to run after him, and the longer they knew each other, the more he seemed to keep her on a tight leash.”

In William and Catherine, Morton writes that the relationship was always on the fritz in the early years because the prince treated Kate “like a servant rather than his girlfriend.” He explained, “There were often spats, rows, and break-ups, and William and Kate tried to find their way both as young adults and as a couple.”

The couple would go on to breakup twice throughout their near-decade-long romance. The first time in 2004 because they were both unsure about having such an intense commitment. Prince William had also become enamored with British heiress Isabella Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe–a woman he apparently had ZERO chance with.

Way back in 2007, a royal insider told Daily Mail, “William was madly in love with [Isabella], but when he knew there was no chance of them getting together he went back to Kate. Kate was very aware of his obsession with Isabella, and she was incredibly threatened by her. Isabella is drop-dead beautiful and would leave any girl in the shade. Kate accepted William back again but on the condition that he would not speak to Isabella again.”

The couple’s second split in 2007, due to long distance and the prince’s wandering eye. In her 2010 biography Kate–Marcia Moody wrote, “rot had set into their relationship.” The duchess was also tired of being dubbed, “Waity Katy” by the press.

Thankfully after their second split, the duke and duchess decided they were in it for the long hall, and by the fall of 2010, they were engaged to be married. With such a rocky road to get to where they are now, with three children, and a taking the lead of the British Royal Family in the future, we highly doubt Prince William would have compromised it all by boldly cheating on his wife.

But hey, crazier things have happened.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 125June 10, 2019 3:03 PM

Isabella was smart.

She got Sam Branson (Richard Branson's son) who is much better looking, and probably has way more money.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1May 30, 2019 3:22 PM

[quote] with three children, and a taking the lead of the British Royal Family in the future, we highly doubt Prince William would have compromised it all by boldly cheating on his wife.

Bullshit.

That never stopped his father, Prince Charles, from cheating on his wife, divorcing her, and then marrying his whore Camilla.

Like father, like son.

by Anonymousreply 2May 30, 2019 3:23 PM

William would be an idiot to cheat on kate she's a good wife mother,and member of the royal family!She's also very popular with the british public and brands losing her would cost them money and respect.

by Anonymousreply 3May 30, 2019 3:28 PM

[quote]Now, royal biographer Andrew Morton, who wrote the book, William and Catherine

[quote]William treated his then-girlfriend, “like a servant.”

[quote]He explained, Prince William “could be flip and curt” with Kate.

Slightly off topic, but this recent habit of bloggers (which is all Stylecaster writers are) putting commas in front of any name, title or quotation is really out of hand. Articles are borderline unreadable when every other sentence has a misused comma. The eye is expecting one thing from the comma but gets something else, and you have to re-read the dreck you just read once already, and within three sentences you're comatose and dumber than when you began the article.

by Anonymousreply 4May 30, 2019 3:29 PM

[quote] Prince William had also become enamored with British heiress Isabella Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe–a woman he apparently had ZERO chance with.

lol

by Anonymousreply 5May 30, 2019 3:41 PM

Isabella, like Chelsy Davies, was a free spirit, loved to smoke pot, etc. There was zero chance either of these women would agree to starve themselves, wear old lady frumpy clothes and spend their days clumping around old people's homes and nurseries.

Isabella named her Branson baby "Bluey" ...

by Anonymousreply 6May 30, 2019 3:59 PM

That's Isabella? The woman described as "drop dead gorgeous"? 😂

by Anonymousreply 7May 30, 2019 4:01 PM

R7. She has a chin and a smidge of curves in the hip area. That's enough.

by Anonymousreply 8May 30, 2019 4:17 PM

No different than Charles treated any of his girlfriends. Last minute invites, the girls were expected to arrive at BP on their own, and he was cheap It's amazing they can find anyone willing to marry them.

by Anonymousreply 9May 30, 2019 4:23 PM

R1-Sam Branson is good looking? Different strokes, I suppose.

by Anonymousreply 10May 30, 2019 4:24 PM

He's a Greek god compared to William.

by Anonymousreply 11May 30, 2019 4:26 PM

Isabella Branson and Cressida Bonas are family.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 12May 30, 2019 4:32 PM

R10 I still have hair.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13May 30, 2019 4:35 PM

Actress Gabriella Wilde (the doctor's wife Caroline on the TV period drama Poldark) is half-sister to Isabella. You can see the family resemblance.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14May 30, 2019 4:45 PM

Goodness me, what a grand entrance, OP, it almost reads like Sussex Royal Instagram.

by Anonymousreply 15May 30, 2019 4:47 PM

Wow british standards are LOW R7.

by Anonymousreply 16May 30, 2019 4:51 PM

I have a chance?!

by Anonymousreply 17May 30, 2019 4:53 PM

R10-I'll give it to you there. He looks hot. The first pic he was too doughy. New one - yum!

by Anonymousreply 18May 30, 2019 4:59 PM

Sorry-above reply was meant for R13.

by Anonymousreply 19May 30, 2019 4:59 PM

Sam Branson is hot - phew. And 5 years younger. Good for her.

by Anonymousreply 20May 30, 2019 5:13 PM

Morton salt. LOL

by Anonymousreply 21May 30, 2019 5:15 PM

R19 Sam isn't tremendously attractive, but he has a few good angles and hair.

Some Dl poster keep trying to convince others that William is attractive because he's rich and he's going to be king. HM is worth 500M and Charles is worth 400M. Even if William inherited it all, which he won't, he's looking at 1B if we are rounding up in his favour.

Richard Branson is worth 5B. Split 2 ways, Sam is looking at 2.5B. Does that make him 2.5 times as attractive as William? Does the hair bump him up to 3 times as hot? Does the lack of a castle or a tiara affect his Q score?

by Anonymousreply 22May 30, 2019 5:18 PM

Both ladies are beautiful.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23May 30, 2019 5:44 PM

The old adage about preferring blondes, but marrying a brunette. At least, as the final bride.

by Anonymousreply 24May 30, 2019 5:57 PM

Wow. Sorry but team Kate here. She’s way earthier and sexier than the blond android.

by Anonymousreply 25May 30, 2019 6:09 PM

Isabella's skin doesn't seem to be aging better than Kate's but she seems to maintain a healthier body weight.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26May 30, 2019 6:15 PM

R22-lack of castles and tiaras definitely affects the Q score, as does the lack of a title. (Dad's a sir, but Sam's not.) I'd say, though, that the full head of hair combined with the larger fortune put Sam comfortably in the lead. That and being able to live a life of fabulous luxury out of the public eye. Yep, I'll take Sam.

by Anonymousreply 27May 30, 2019 6:41 PM

Run along. I'm expecting a visitor.

by Anonymousreply 28May 30, 2019 7:11 PM

R14... Now, that's drop dead gorgeous!

by Anonymousreply 29May 30, 2019 8:41 PM

[quote]Richard Branson is worth 5B. Split 2 ways, Sam is looking at 2.5B.

Richard Branson and his wife Joan have signed the Giving Pledge, so no, their sons will not inherit billions.

by Anonymousreply 30May 30, 2019 8:57 PM

[quote] Kate accepted William back again but on the condition that he would not speak to Isabella again.

R1 I understand that with all that money it's a different game, but why do many women insist on this? Is it a gut feeling that their man is a dog? Why not let him go and find a man who can keep it in his pants around other beautiful women because he actually loves you and you feel it in your bones?

by Anonymousreply 31May 30, 2019 8:57 PM

IMO, William is lucky to have Kate. I'm not denying that part of the attraction was that he's the future king - otherwise, the press attention would have put her off - but I also get the impression she's genuinely devoted to him. If he treats her poorly, more fool him.

by Anonymousreply 32May 30, 2019 9:04 PM

R30. The Giving Pledge is flexible. They promise to give more than 50% of their wealth. That can be during their lifetime or after their death. If Branson counts his current philanthropic activity towards this pledge, his children will still inherit billions.

by Anonymousreply 33May 30, 2019 9:10 PM

At least William looks hot for a change in the OP's pic, caught him at a flattering angle or something.

by Anonymousreply 34May 30, 2019 9:47 PM

Kate stalked him from day one, changing her uni plans at least twice just to try to throw herself into his path. She was basically raised to wed a rich aristo and won the grand prize.

Everyone knows he cheats on her all the time. He married her because he had to get married and she was the only one willing. But hey she stuck around and tolerated him cheating and treating her like crap, and now she’ll be queen one day.

I agree Kate is much more attractive.

by Anonymousreply 35May 30, 2019 10:02 PM

This article is a compilation of quotes from third-tier gossip rags. Good job, OP!

by Anonymousreply 36May 30, 2019 10:05 PM

[quote]with three children, and a taking the lead of the British Royal Family in the future, we highly doubt Prince William would have compromised it all by boldly cheating on his wife.

A chick wrote this nonsense because a dick doesn't think about the three kids or all of the other nonsense she mentions. A straight dick wants new/different pussy. Always.

by Anonymousreply 37May 30, 2019 10:11 PM

[quote] Isabella Branson and Cressida Bonas are family.

The names Cressida Bonas makes me angry. Was this bitch named after a Toyota Cressida or something? And Bonas? It's too close to sounding like bones. What a stupid name.

by Anonymousreply 38May 30, 2019 10:28 PM

R38 Hi, Meghan! You got Harry. What more do you want?

by Anonymousreply 39May 30, 2019 11:53 PM

Haha... waitey Katie.

She sucks.

The bitch got what she deserves. A husband who cheats, and a loveless marriage.

The icing on the cake would be if he divorced her before she could become queen. Burn!

by Anonymousreply 40May 31, 2019 6:03 AM

Life isn't a faaaaairytale

by Anonymousreply 41May 31, 2019 6:16 AM

“Everyone knows he cheats on her all the time”, R35?

I don’t - fill me in: Names, dates, locations and proof would be great, thanks!

Don’t make stuff up, it just makes you look stupid.

by Anonymousreply 42May 31, 2019 7:36 AM

St Andrews University is the icing on the cake, you don't change plans on unis if that one is your desired choice. Of course you will have others as second or third choices if you don't get in. But you don't change plans about going there.

by Anonymousreply 43May 31, 2019 8:21 AM

Waity Katey used to run interference for William, entering restaurants and night spots to scout for paparazzi and make sure that management and staff were apprised that a royal was about to make an entrance, then go back out and report to Wills that all was in readiness for him.

Servant indeed!

by Anonymousreply 44May 31, 2019 8:36 AM

Doors to manual!

by Anonymousreply 45May 31, 2019 8:42 AM

Are you saying was not only a servant, but she was also doing the royal protection officers' jobs? That's a threefer: GF, servant, and security.

by Anonymousreply 46May 31, 2019 9:43 AM

I suddenly feel sorry for Kate..

by Anonymousreply 47May 31, 2019 10:05 AM

Oh please. She wanted him, an adorable family with him and to be Queen. She'll get all three. She's obviously made peace with whatever else comes with that. Thanks to the obnoxious Sparkle, Kate is now the popular English rose... Will can't divorce her, not without looking bad. Charles has never rebounded from the Diana/Camilla stuff. He knows all too well.

by Anonymousreply 48May 31, 2019 11:43 AM

R38 - Cressida is a mythological name so it was here long before the invention of cars. Duh.

by Anonymousreply 49May 31, 2019 11:50 AM

The name Cressida always makes me think of the garden cress that we used to grow at primary school.

by Anonymousreply 50May 31, 2019 11:57 AM

R43 - St Andrews offered me a place without interview (and I already had my grades) the year William went but I turned them down for somewhere else. It's not like Oxford or Cambridge where there are hordes of people desperate to get in.

In Britain I would say that only Oxford and Cambridge has that really high cachet, I don't think there's anywhere else that would be really surprising to turn down.

by Anonymousreply 51May 31, 2019 11:57 AM

Some people on this thread have definitely never heard of the Shakespeare play Troilus and Cressida.

by Anonymousreply 52May 31, 2019 11:59 AM

[quote] She wanted him, an adorable family with him and to be Queen.

Correction - her mother wanted all that!

by Anonymousreply 53May 31, 2019 1:15 PM

R13 he looks like a combination of Spencer Pratt and Ryan Philippe.

by Anonymousreply 54May 31, 2019 1:18 PM

It's still not a fairytale

by Anonymousreply 55May 31, 2019 6:50 PM

Go back to Tumblr sugar at r42

by Anonymousreply 56May 31, 2019 9:24 PM

Kate's a cunt.

by Anonymousreply 57June 1, 2019 3:31 AM

Cressida Bonas is Isabella's half-sister. They have the same mother. Cressida is better-looking than Isabella.

by Anonymousreply 58June 1, 2019 7:14 AM

I'M IN LOOOOOVE WITH A FAIRYTALE EVEN THOUGH IT HURTS!

by Anonymousreply 59June 2, 2019 11:57 AM

This was all in a Vanity Fair article years ago. How Kate and William lived together during the university year but then on holidays, he'd just ditch her and spend it in Africa with that woman who lived there, Jecca (?). The Waitey Katie moniker was real. Eventually the Queen or Prince Charles told him to stop faffing about and either marry her or break it off.

They put up a good front nowadays and the kids are adorable (as most kids are) but if he's a boor in private life, I don't see how she can tolerate it. Just as I don't understand how MM can deal with a husband who is stupid as Harry is said to be. No matter what your agenda, narc or not, doesn't it come to a point at the breakfast table where you think, I can't tolerate another minute with this moron?

by Anonymousreply 60June 2, 2019 12:36 PM

It would with me R60, I cannot imagine staying with a partner who consistently put my feelings last, treated me 'like a servant', (as William was said to do with Kate in the past), was massively egocentric or incredibly stupid in an obnoxious way. People may envy Kate or Meghan but I'd far rather live on a tiny tiny percentage of what they have to spend, in one room in a shared house (like I do), and know that the people who I spend my time with really really care about me. No amount of dresses can replace that.

by Anonymousreply 61June 2, 2019 1:30 PM

Most people think like you, R61, which is why these princes don't have the breadth of choice you'd suppose.

However Kate, like Mary of Denmark, is extremely well suited and dedicated to her role, and is an extremely valuable addition to the Brand, which has not escaped Elizabeth nor Margarethe respectively.

The British aristocracy has forever had a tradition of unfaithful males and wives who learned to ignore it - Diana was the odd one out in that respect. She was such a narcissist she pretended that, as a member of the aristocracy, she had never heard of this tradition, and/or it shouldn't apply to her. On the other hand, I have to say that there are a great many pictures of Kate looking at William while on Royal duties, and in almost every one she is really fixed on him and smiling, as though she really likes him and he really interests her. He rarely looks as though he is unaware of or snubbing that. Maybe they're great actors, or maybe, like a lot of men, if he didn't adore her at first he has learned to admire her as a dutiful wife and mother and the core of his home, and she is therefore genuinely Woman #1 in his life.

by Anonymousreply 62June 2, 2019 1:54 PM

[quote] if he's a boor in private life, I don't see how she can tolerate it. Just as I don't understand how MM can deal with a husband who is stupid as Harry is said to be

Meghan wears the pants in that family.

MM is older, wiser, and much more worldly than Harry. She is very saavy, and you can tell that she calls the shots in that relationship.

It's a world of difference from William and Kate.

by Anonymousreply 63June 2, 2019 5:25 PM

[quote] like a lot of men, if he didn't adore her at first he has learned to admire her as a dutiful wife and mother and the core of his home, and she is therefore genuinely Woman #1 in his life.

R62 How I wish this was true in real life, and not just movies from the 1950s!

by Anonymousreply 64June 2, 2019 10:46 PM

R62 there are times when he seem annoyed with her. I don’t think I’ve seen any pics of him looking at her as admirably as she does with him.

by Anonymousreply 65June 2, 2019 10:54 PM

Describing Kate as earthy, are you referencing her hygiene?

by Anonymousreply 66June 2, 2019 11:05 PM

R66 Hi, Harry :)

by Anonymousreply 67June 3, 2019 2:02 PM

Prince William was not a man with limited options who had to settle. That's absurd. I'm sure he was a little shit sometimes, having been inevitably spoiled and maybe with some lingering, existential bitterness over his Mother's premature death but the idea that he was just stuck with Kate because he had nothing else, is not very believable.

by Anonymousreply 68June 3, 2019 2:15 PM

R68 William was rejected by all the aristo women he actually wanted :/

by Anonymousreply 69June 3, 2019 9:05 PM

R63 Kate is older than William too. But only by 6 months.

by Anonymousreply 70June 3, 2019 10:03 PM

R69 If Prince William was rejected by "aristocrats", they're not aristocrats, they're heiresses. Aristocrats don't reject the Prince at the top of the food chain, especially one who in the early 2000's, was undeniably gorgeous and pleasant, at least publicly.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 71June 4, 2019 2:13 AM

How do we know he cheats on her? There's nothing definitive in this account.

Of course we can assume he does, but I'm just wondering if there have been any confirmed incidents and where to read about them.

by Anonymousreply 72June 4, 2019 4:16 PM

If William is/was insufferable as the first born son of the heir to the throne, just imagine what a demanding diva THIS ONE is going to be!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 73June 4, 2019 4:27 PM

Honey, I wouldn't go to close to the water unattended Georgie.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74June 4, 2019 4:46 PM

Incorrect r71.

Real aristos look down on the Royal Family. (I am not aristocratic myself but my family - and our original title - dates back to 1066). The Royal Family are very much seen as johnny come latelys.

No aristocratic woman would marry William because it’s really not a desirable job for anyone who is part of that world and knows the score. Genuine aristos can land men with far more money from much older and more prestigious families, who will allow them to live in the lap of luxury and do whatever they want.

The complete lack of any privacy or freedom, the stifling protocol, having your life run by the “little grey men” - posh girls run a mile from all that.

It’s only Americans and middle class women who think being a “princess” is desirable.

by Anonymousreply 75June 4, 2019 5:31 PM

Rose and her husband were reported as being at the state dinner last night but I haven't found any photos of them.

by Anonymousreply 76June 4, 2019 5:38 PM

[quote] It’s only Americans and middle class women who think being a “princess” is desirable.

Does that group include "Waitey Katie?"

by Anonymousreply 77June 4, 2019 5:41 PM

Kate was middle-class, perhaps upper-middle class, but definitely middle. There was a lot written in the papers at the time about how the prince/heir to the throne was marrying a 'middle-class girl'.

by Anonymousreply 78June 4, 2019 5:52 PM

William definitely has a type. Kate, Jecca Craig, and Rose Hanbury if she was ever his mistress are very similar.

by Anonymousreply 79June 5, 2019 5:25 AM

Harry used to have a type and Markle isn't it. I wonder if he'll revert to type once the fog clears?

She may have been Waity Katie as a young woman but she's a powerhouse in the Royal Family now. She is hugely popular and she keeps cranking out adorable kids. Wills appears settled and content. He may or may not fuck around but there are no serious scandals, he is exercising discretion. If she ever takes up a real workload, there'll be no stopping her.

The Queen just made Kate Dame Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order, she wore the sash to the state dinner. The Queen obviously trusts her and trusts Sophie Wessex. This is no small feat for girls marrying in after the Diana and Fergie disasters. And let's not forget it's not just girls, Anne is also divorced and now remarried.

by Anonymousreply 80June 5, 2019 6:02 AM

And Anne is married to this second guy in name only. They are separated.

by Anonymousreply 81June 5, 2019 6:09 AM

R1 Branson would need 10 lifetimes to have what the heir to the throne of England will have access to. My God, the real estate and jewelry alone...

by Anonymousreply 82June 5, 2019 6:54 AM

And we are forgetting the substantial money Charlie and his mother have stashed away in offshore accounts. Katie is doing just fine...Branson or no Branson

by Anonymousreply 83June 5, 2019 7:10 AM

lol at the delusional frau in this thread. Always going on about the "adorable" or "attractive" average looking camb kids. None of the three kids stand out. They're just average looking kids, nothing especially cute about them at all.

And what the heck do you know about Harry's type? He had a halle berry poster on his bedroom wall as a teenager. What someone has access to and what their fantasy type is can be very different.

Btw, kate is not "hugely popular". How quickly one forgets. 3 years ago she was absolutely hated, the evidence is there in old comment sections in various different news/gossip sites and forums. She's only mildly poplar now for one simple reason: she's not the half black one.

No one actually talks about kate other than to compare negatively and use her as a chess piece to use to lord over meghan. Fairweather fans are fickle and the Keen One won't be able to hide behind her sister in law forever. Besides, waity has bigger things to worry about....her position is not secured, neither are her childrens, she's not even PoW yet and I doubt she ever will be. Watch this space.

Oh and waity only got the DGC because bill cheated on her. Fact.

by Anonymousreply 84June 5, 2019 9:42 AM

The rf does not own the "real estate" or the jewels you stupid yank. Balmoral, sandringham, yes. The rest, no. They are restricted. It can all end anytime the public decides they've (we've) had enough.

by Anonymousreply 85June 5, 2019 9:47 AM

Thank you r85. Some posters are crazy if they can't see the benefit of being a billionaire 5x over over a King. William will always have to bend to social pressure, smile when told, dine with other assholes, and worry about the future of the monarchy. Their lives will revolve around pointless speeches and charity functions. Staff and fancy houses aren't that great once you take into account strict budget restrictions by the government and the upkeep for century old homes.

A billionaire can command respect, buy a castle or palace, shower his wife with (royal) jewels, have a full set of household staff, buy/marry into a titled family, rub shoulders with the royal puppets, then do whatever else their heart desires. I'd take the billions and be like Trump's kids, visit Buckingham Palace, look out the famous balcony, then go about my life. Been there, done that, back to enjoying my freedom.

by Anonymousreply 86June 5, 2019 10:16 AM

r83 most people don't doubt that William will command a billion dollar fortune, but the social pressure of his position makes it impossible for him to enjoy it like a normal billionaire, unless he wants to abolish the monarchy.

by Anonymousreply 87June 5, 2019 10:19 AM

R85 I didn't say he "owned" anything, you illiterate English ass. I specifically used the phrase, "has access to". For his lifetime. Which is really all any of us has, despite ownership.

R86 My OP was referencing the wealth aspect only; not the lifestyle. IA. The dull charity events, the meet and greets..(shudder). But Branson nor any billionaire will never be able to replicate the wealth of the rf. You say buy a castle. Can they replicate Buckingham Palace? Windsor? And the priceless art work, 1 of a kind antiques and other treasures within? In addition to Sandringham and Balmoral? Plus other real estate all over the globe?

by Anonymousreply 88June 5, 2019 3:36 PM

[quote]I don’t think I’ve seen any pics of him looking at her as admirably as she does with him.

Took the words right out of my mouth, r65. I also noticed William hardly glances at Kate. Will is a pretty cool (read: cold) customer it seems.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 89June 5, 2019 8:28 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 90June 6, 2019 6:48 AM

You nailed it, R84!

And Waitey Katie had better find a lover, or she's in for a miserable and lonely life.

by Anonymousreply 91June 6, 2019 6:52 AM

R71 If Elon Musk got hair plugs, why can't Wills?

by Anonymousreply 92June 7, 2019 9:15 PM

STFU, OP is a Meghanstan

by Anonymousreply 93June 7, 2019 10:09 PM

I think William might just be one of those people who doesn't love deeply in that eternal way that we all dream about - but not many people do. In all cases, he certainly knows his duty

by Anonymousreply 94June 8, 2019 8:17 PM

R94, Very insightful comment. So you think he'll stay with Kate but essentially lead separate lives except for official duties and Royal obligations? Know that many wealthy and elite have always done the same. Marriage is considered more of a business alliance than a romantic union.

by Anonymousreply 95June 8, 2019 8:22 PM

R91, Rumors are that Kate looked to a previously single Prince Harry for emotional support, and Killing Kittens or something similar for other fun. Lots of beyond wild rumors about her personal interests. T or f?

by Anonymousreply 96June 8, 2019 8:23 PM

Buckingham Palace is a complete dump and extremely run down inside. I’m talking rodent infestation, decades of dog urine, damp, structural problems, etc. etc. This is all well-documented.

Many of the royal properties are in a terrible state of repair due to the Queen’s refusal to pay the many millions of pounds it would take to keep them in good condition, and many have zero privacy.

Unless you have a major hard on for British history (which actual Brits don’t), they are not desirable as homes. Plus they have to live in the UK and have to live where they’re told.

Marrying a billionaire and you can live in a much nicer home, have a brownstone in NY, a pied a terre in Paris, little retreat in the Swiss Alps or Barbados.

Even compared to ‘ordinary’ Brit aristocrats, it’s a bit of a dump. Look at Rose Hansbury’s house, it’s a million times nicer and more luxurious (and has a better art collection) than most of the royal residencies. And just because the Crown owns things doesn’t mean those lower in line have access to them.

by Anonymousreply 97June 8, 2019 8:28 PM

r96, I don’t know anything about Kate’s private life but I remember the media and royal stans pushing the “Kate and Harry have a close friendship and special bond” thing for years before Kate married William, and were completely taken aback when Harry made a comment (about the wedding) about looking forward to getting to know Kate, implying not only had they not been friends before, but he barely knew her.

by Anonymousreply 98June 8, 2019 8:33 PM

Since you can't make money off Diana pics you have to invent shit.

Kindly fuck off.

by Anonymousreply 99June 8, 2019 8:44 PM

R95 He might know his duty now, but considering this day and age, I'd say it's a 50/50

by Anonymousreply 100June 8, 2019 10:21 PM

I don't think the public would be all that tolerant of a philandering William. Once the queen dies, every little drama will cause the public to re-evaluate whether the monarchy is all that necessary. The Cambridges have to be seen as a model of stability.

by Anonymousreply 101June 8, 2019 10:26 PM

R101 The monarchy becomes less and less necessary day by day, considering that they conceded all their political power

by Anonymousreply 102June 8, 2019 10:27 PM

You go, R75! You tell us how you're too precious for the royal family. You've got some busy shite to type out to the internet, that's what! You're important! Why, why, why - you might have to microwave a dinner at any second and heaven knows that's more significant than a royal banquet.

Do share more about how your family's importance for the past thousand years, is why you're shitstorming on DL, instead of all the much more important engagements that someone of your historical pedigree would ordinarily be expected to attend do.

Please. We're all desperate for air as we await you.

by Anonymousreply 103June 8, 2019 10:35 PM

R103 I think the point of R75 's post was that other aristos DON'T have to go to "important" social engagements if they choose not to

by Anonymousreply 104June 8, 2019 10:38 PM

I mean, heck, I've seen parents with multiple children (allegedly) post here, when they should, of course, be keeping a watchful eye on their children and not opening potential gay porn in front of them

by Anonymousreply 105June 8, 2019 10:41 PM

R104, if R75 were an actual aristo of any stripe whatsoever instead of a keyboard warrior, she'd have something better to do than type on the internet.

by Anonymousreply 106June 8, 2019 10:41 PM

R106 Marlon Brando liked to start arguments on the internet in his spare time

by Anonymousreply 107June 8, 2019 10:45 PM

R86, What a trashy "Real Housewives" way to think. Being a monarch is to be forever a part of history.

by Anonymousreply 108June 9, 2019 12:02 AM

The BRF have "access" to pretty much whatever they want. Even members of the Household can borrow silver and china for parties.

by Anonymousreply 109June 9, 2019 12:02 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 110June 9, 2019 12:09 AM

R110 Can anyone hook me up with her husband? Please? He's exactly my type, especially since he's probably gay and won't touch me

by Anonymousreply 111June 9, 2019 12:12 AM

I have news for R75, though. My family dates back to 1066, too.

by Anonymousreply 112June 9, 2019 12:22 AM

R112 OMG, so does mine! Uncanny

by Anonymousreply 113June 9, 2019 12:23 AM

Gossip spillers, Please ignore the obvious trolls on this thread trying to derail it with their silly insults re what a stranger chooses to do with your time. Obviously the trolls are totally powerless in their real lives and therefore try to control others on DL.

by Anonymousreply 114June 9, 2019 1:21 AM

True aristocrats, much like the royals, are mostly inbred morons, so I wouldn't be bragging about being one. And for the comma Nazi, there isn't a single misplaced comma in all of your examples, so I'm not sure what you're going on about.

by Anonymousreply 115June 9, 2019 1:44 AM

Well it looks like the "rumors" were true, judging from the article at R110.

Poor Waitey Katie.

by Anonymousreply 116June 9, 2019 1:58 AM

Hi, also just want to add- for the person upthread claiming they’d rather be the Trump kids- the Kushners were essentially run out of their Jewish NYC circle after the election, hence turning to DC to play Kennedy. There are social repercussions when you’re new money/new power, ie money can’t buy you class.

Also, your argument rings false, because the future King cuckolded the Chomondeley aristo. King 1. Aristo, 0.

by Anonymousreply 117June 9, 2019 2:00 AM

Willy says,

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 118June 9, 2019 2:02 AM

R117, Wouldn't it matter that the cuckholder was very willing as it's assumed he's more gay than straight? Also implications I've read online on other gossip sites that the Royals are into swinging with other elite, and that Kate used to frequent Killing Kittens? Meaning that Kate & Rose were very friendly together, so that as long as she's not publicly humiliated her husband has his freedom.

by Anonymousreply 119June 9, 2019 2:05 AM

What is Killing Kittens exactly - posh Members Only swingers club? These used to be big in Paris 'la partouze.' Absolutely cannot see Kate participating in this.

by Anonymousreply 120June 9, 2019 6:49 AM

“Out of nowhere, the world was nearly set aflame when unconfirmed reports claimed that the prince had cheated on his wife with her good friend, Rose Hanbury.”

by Anonymousreply 121June 9, 2019 1:21 PM

I don't know why Kate would care if William cheats. She can have her pick of Astro man or a strapping military hunk to keep her kitty satisfied. Why waste tears on balding William?

r108 I stand by the billionaire over royalty lifestyle. I see similarities between being Royal and being a part of America's First Family. Both sets of lifestyles or confining. Not one Fist Family has every raved about their time in the WH with constant public attention on their every move. By the end of their terms FFs are usually running to Marine One to get out of the limelight. Funny enough, Harry said that no one in the family really wants the crown anyway. It's not all that fun. If we were talking about the Scandinavian crowns, which rarely make the news outside of their kingdoms, then yeah, it's a good life. But the BRF create international news; they are never free from scrutiny. Either this thread or another, it was stated that those fabulous palaces are in need of serious repair. Charles is going give up BP as a royal residence once the Queen dies because it's too much to take on and it's uncomfortable, not to mention gaudy. A billionaire can have many of the royal perks minus the scrutiny and title. So you must be living in some Disney fairytale because even members of the family have told us, in indirect ways, that The Firm sucks.

Now, Kate is in the best situation because all money will flow to William. But the country is becoming more brown and less Christian. This is a real threat to the crown as the Parliament slowly starts to represent these cultural changes. How likely will the new Britain accept a white monarchy? I don't know, but it will be interesting to see. What will the country look like by the. time George takes the throne? How will their relationship with Parliament play out? These are just some natural issues that a monarchy must contend with in a global economy, while a billionaire just needs to figure out how to sell people their products and services, then pass the wealth along to their offspring within minimal tax implications.

by Anonymousreply 122June 9, 2019 10:07 PM

The renovations on the Middleton’s new home were tax funded. Security fencing. Bomb proof doors and windows. A building for extra staff and security. A new primary and secondary kitchen to support number of staff. And a wing for Kate and George + nanny. None of it was private. Over a million.

To William being rumored to help them financially… this is why it came out. The Midds applied for a loan in a foreign bank. For a brief moment their financials were exposed. Not much liquid and a double mortgage on the home they wanted to sell. No way they could pay cash so suddenly.

by Anonymousreply 123June 10, 2019 1:21 AM

Maybe Kate's hoo-ha is a bit too bushy for William's liking.

She needs to tame that jungle.

by Anonymousreply 124June 10, 2019 1:53 AM

r103 you seem weirdly oveinvested in proving that William could have married any woman in England, thus proving Kate’s desirability as marital prize. This is clearly nonsense.

I’m not aristocratic at all (and yes I own a microwave, who doesn’t?), especially as my mother was descended from Jewish refugees. But my father’s family were aristos so I have a reasonable insight. I am not, as you accused me earlier, a black woman living in America.

I notice that none of the Kate sugars/Meghan bashers have a single post outside of Kate and Meghan threads. If you check my posting history you’ll see that I’m a frequent poster across DL, obviously British, and that most of my posts are in the theatre threads or most recently the Tonys threads.

by Anonymousreply 125June 10, 2019 3:03 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!