Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.
Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.
Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.
Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.
The comment, however, diverges from his decision in 2016 to not consider President Obama’s Supreme Court nomination of Merrick Garland following the sudden death of Justice Antonin Scalia earlier that year.
McConnell is a slimy bastard who should have a heart attack leave this world.
| by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 29, 2019 6:30 AM |
betcha Clarence Thomas resigns soon so Trump can replace him
| by Anonymous | reply 1 | May 29, 2019 5:41 AM |
At a chamber luncheon in Paducah, Kentucky, on Tuesday, McConnell was asked by a member of the audience, “Should a Supreme Court justice die next year, what will your position be on filling that spot?"
“I would fill it,” he responded, smirking, which drew loud laughter.
| by Anonymous | reply 2 | May 29, 2019 5:41 AM |
drop dead you ugly SOB
| by Anonymous | reply 3 | May 29, 2019 6:08 AM |
We should take up Milkshaking these cunts like the Brits are doing to that cunt Farage.
Just douse them with sugary dairy products and let them deal with the flies.
| by Anonymous | reply 4 | May 29, 2019 6:11 AM |
R1. We have to hope that none of the liberal judges resign while Trump is in office. That's the danger. Replacing Thomas with another conservative is bad, but it's not a death blow. However, replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a conservative whack job would be the nail in the coffin for generations.
| by Anonymous | reply 5 | May 29, 2019 6:16 AM |
Not news.
We all said this is how McConnell would act, but the spoiled babies who stayed home and the brats who wanted to "send a message to the DNC" helped us get Trump anyway.
| by Anonymous | reply 6 | May 29, 2019 6:17 AM |
I think his prior logic applied during a lame duck election year. Trump is running for re-election so the rule would not apply.
| by Anonymous | reply 7 | May 29, 2019 6:20 AM |
R7 It's the same BS. And I look forward to pissing on McConnell's grave someday
| by Anonymous | reply 8 | May 29, 2019 6:24 AM |
Of course it would apply, R7. Are you retarded?
There is every chance that there will be a new president in 2021 and that this fat lying fuck will be tossed out on his fat lying ass. The Billion Dollar Loser loses again.
McConnell's phony bullshit position was to "Let the people vote and have their say and you can't confirm a Supreme in the last year of a president's term." Obviously he was lying then just as he's lying now. Don't defend that cunt and his anti-constitutional behavior.
| by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 29, 2019 6:30 AM |
Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.
Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!
