Skippies vs Sugars

'Didn't you see Harry touch the babies arm? There's a hidden button that makes the plastic/silicone eyes blink.'

Best comic moment from other thread.

R1, odd that all the Skippies make frequent spelling errors. Those with low IQs tend to gravitate to conspiracy theories. These crackpots often believe in fake flag attacks too.

I love how Harry and Meghan presented their baby. It seemed so regal, and I'm glad they didn't copy Kate, who copied Diana and do the Lindo Hall thing.

Too much hulabaloo over one carbon unit. Next.

R3, agree. Meghan looked so young with her slightly fuller face. A very sweet woman.

Stepford Kate is bland and boring.

R3, Why don't you recognize a good photoshop?

R5, Why didn't you recognize a good makeup artist work to make MM face look fuller? Easy tricks.

R3, it was a live broadcast, you silly Skippie. And her face was full because of pregancy weight, not make up.

OP, Your poll is incorrect. There is a surrogate baby Archie. He's at least 2 weeks old. He's not the same as the Reborn fake presented in the very obviously photoshopped portrait with the Queen and Prince P.

R4, This is a very entertaining comedy - soap opera for those of us who recognize basic, elementary trickery.

Meant R7

R7 Nachos and champagne can do it in a flash.

R8i, Please watch the videos I posted in the first 2 threads. Here's the link to the 2nd one.

https://www.datalounge.com/thread/23875389

R9, you are pure comedy gold. Please continue. Tell us again about the hidden button the Queen's grandson pressed to make the doll blink.

R9 Indeed, just waiting for the curtain (mask) to be unfurled. Many will be disappointed. Has been coming for a while. Haven't seen such a cheaply produced charade perpetuated on the general public in quite a while.

R13, Thank you for the compliment & recognition of my comedic talent. However I'm seeing my BF tomorrow and must go to sleep.

Re" Photoshopped picture of queen meeting doll - Note where Prince Phillip's left breast pocket meets Harry's right arm.

R14, Agreed. Which media source will publicly reveal the whole truth 1st?

Would this be one of the reasons why so many of MM's staff quit? Otherwise they'd be complicit in the massive fakery. If it changes the Royal succession line, then would any knowledgeable staff be dissed?

R16 I'm awaiting the fallout. This crapola can only be propped up for so long. The fingerpointing and who "didn't know what/when" could make for a great comic send up if handled correctly. I can't believe they've allowed this nonsense with such a non-entity to possibly challenge their very existence. Can they just take out a giant eraser and pretend like PH's marriage never happened. "As the Royal Turns..."

What is this showing off newborn nonsense? The Queen never did it and neither did her mother nor her grandmother before her. Formal pictures were only permitted during the baby's christening before the late Princess Diana came into the picture. Princess Diana only started this trend to court and manipulate the parapazzi. Courting the parapazzi eventually lead to Princess Diana's early death.

I wouldn.t be surprised they are using the house of George and Amal Clooney . It would explain a lot .

Wow, on R18, they don't look so happy.

Diana was a fame junkie so of course she wanted a press conference. Meghan is more private and didn't want dozens of cameras flashing in her two day old baby's face.

buy Soma online without a prescription

[quote]I wouldn.t be surprised they are using the house of George and Amal Clooney .

That's not the Clooney's residence.

Famewhores are only selectively private. Perhaps reality has finally intervened.

This is almost as funny as the Havenettes.

Are Kristin and Rob still darting around with their children in those underground tunnels?

There was no blinking. Archie was shown in profile only, no eye or mouth movement, wrapped like a burrito.

And since when do HM and Philip do anything but formal, sit-down photos with newborn great-children?

Weird that there was but one picture with Doria. None of her (or the Queen's, FTM) arrival, greeting the royals, departure, etc. Just one "Three Wise Men" type pose. None of simply Doria, Meghan, and Archie.

Unless more are being saved for "Hello" magazine.

I like the "surrogate plus doll" theory. Why not? It would play to Harry's press paranoia; it would explain his "changes in two weeks" remark; it would cover the white dress; it would resolve the non-movement of Archie when held by Harry; and it would account for the large feet (a photo released later of someone's hand holding some baby's feet).

The theory also is supported by the confusing birth timeline; the eschewing of royal physicians and hospital; the lack of proper doctor signatures on documents; and, indeed, the lack of a birth certificate at all. The timeline does fit, however, into a surrogacy calendar.

Ah, well. Time marches on, and the living child will grow and be seen. And presumably loved.

R25, Skippies are the new Havenettes. Skippy is HNK and they also use ideas from the Larries.

R21, Are you kidding?! This ACTRESS is "more private"? Perhaps if skulduggery is afoot! But she normally searches for the cameras!

R26 As entertaining as this all is (for the love of God) -- SHUT. IT. DOWN. Such a sad and sorry production. It took until the fake "reveal" photo to get Doria's hair smoothed out. It's over.

One Sky team vs dozens of press teams at the Lindo Wing? Yep, more private.

Also, although women bleed after birth, it's easily contained with a sanitary pad. It's not uncontrollable and leaking everywhere so there's no reason why she shouldn't wear a cream dress for a ten minute interview. Kate's first two Lindo outfits were pale too.

R29, how do you think they should shut it down?

Someone mentioned that in the group photo, Doria, Meghan and Harry had a light reflection on their foreheads but the Queen and Philip did not. It's because the Queen and Philip don't have oily skin like the other three. Plus, the Queen's hair is dry and white and wouldn't reflect a light.

R31 Maybe they could disclose MM's mental illness and wrap it up in a Brand Sussex' Mental Health endeavor with a brand appropriate overpriced luxury appointment with a Harkle approved vendor. It hurts the eyes and soul to watch this clusterf*ck continue.

If the group shot is photoshopped, some PS expert will analyze it as a fraud, judging from the pixels.

R29, You seem to contradict yourself. Do you want the CT "shut down"? Or are you saying it accounts for "Doria's hair smoothed out"?

In either case, commands are ignored here. JSYK.

Skippy: Prison is why old doria does social work (if that's the truth). They have to do social work as a condition of their release for being imprisoned for dealing in drugs, and I don't what other reasons. MM tells she's a social worker, etc., like nobody knows why people like doria are forced to do it. lol

R35 You're overly sensitive. What is the CT?? Doesn't matter. I'm observing from afar but it doesn't look good. I feel bad that the BRF is saddled with this creature.

R34, Someone, not an "expert," did just that, and pointed out what look like "pixel bleeds" onto surfaces beyond their boundaries. Like clothing patterns, e.g. But photo manipulation probably works in many ways.

That Skippie at R36 has got confused between social work and court ordered community service.

R38, why did HM allow Meg to photoshop her into a pic?

R37, "CT" in Americanese is "Conspiracy Theory." I was simply trying to ascertain your opinion, which, as I said, seems self-contradictory. So since you are here, could you expound on your "Doria's hair" comment?

R40, For the Firm. And it's physically no hassle for people in their 90s.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

R42, so HM supports M in her deception just so the RF can be all SJW and say they are now biracial?

R41 As for Doria, bless her heart. She chose to be on the world stage.

No R44 -- MM is still mystery meat. The BRF is still the British Royal Family. This Archie creature -- to be determined.

Do we get to talk CT here? Because I just LOVE the one about Meghan taking off with the baby and living at Amal’s empty mansion with only the staff for company! I really want this one to be true.

IF it’s true, I can imagine MM having a big tantrum, being told she can’t do something (or that she has to do something). Using the baby as a pawn (as a narc would) and taking off with it. Considering that they have bodyguards and security, I wonder if a scenario like that could ever play out at all. Think about it - what if they had a huge argument and she wanted to storm off and take the baby? Could security stop her?

I wonder if she’s becoming increasingly paranoid postpartum. Those hormones are a bitch.

Megs is great for the RF's image with younger people. She's like a Kardashian, same age as Kim with dark, striking looks and a taste for luxury.

Hopefully we'll get a big 40 page Hello feature of the Soho Farmhouse decor soon. Is it true they're building a pool? It won't get much use.

I also read that they're planning a vacation to private Maldives island Velaa.

R47, talk all the CT you like!

It's all very amusing.

Big CT from Instagram: PH closeted and dating Timothee Chalamet. Megan is a beard and surrogate for an IVF baby who is biologically PH's.

I thought the other Harry was with Timothee! Harry Styles!

R51, a Mexican magazine also reported that Harry Styles was the father of Archie Windsor!

Harry needed a Kate wannabe since he had not be succesfull wooing Kate and Pippa .

Weird that H's two previous gfs Cressida and Chelsea were indentikit blondes and Meghan is so different.

Is Meghan swanning around the Clooney mansion as we speculate? Planning her escape from Frog Holler?

Yes I think so R55 😂

Very telling that MM has not hired a nanny or a cook. Doria will be helping out but for how long?

At least this drama has diminished the tabloid news of the Khartrashians, so many positives.

R55, Perhaps MM wants to replace Amal Clooney. The latter's husband seems to be very attracted to a certain type.

Yes she,wouldn’t have a second doubt If she could snag him .But I don’t think Clooney is gonna get an upgrade when he marries this one . He wants an attractieve tall and slender wife not a dumpy woman like M . And she is old now in HWood years .

R59, Speaking of MM's age, there's been a lot of evidence provided on the internet that like her former childhood BFF MM is actually 41 or 42 and born in 1977.

Why would a tabloid make up such an outlandish story like “Megan is staying at the Clooney mansion” - with such elaborate details! - if it were untrue?

The details about her “wing” with its own kitchen and gym fixed up to be a yoga studio and the carved Italian crib for Archie and Amal offering to fly in their nanny to assist Meghan... those are specific details.

Perhaps a detailed offer was made and not accepted, and the story got twisted as something that did happen? I can’t make sense of it.

R61, Comments on various online videos claim Harry has been living separately, or in a different wing than his wife, for the last several months. He attended the Queen's B-day celebration solo.

Rumors that Amal Clooney wants to be Archie's Godmother, questionable as she's not a member of the Church of England.

R62, comments from Skippies on various online videos of course claim this. But that doesn't make it fact, Skippy.

Disgusting

R63, Do you have any evidence to prove or even to suggest that what others have said re MM & Harry isn't true?

Clearly the video linked previously of the couple with the doll wasn't shown on the day it was filmed. Evidence? Drastic change of weather between the 2 different days.

R65, the weather in the Uk the day of the broadcast was sunshine and showers. The weather in one place can be sunny and it can be rainy just a mile away. I guess you don't understand this. Evidence that she lives at Frog Cottage is reputable news sources and royal spokesmen saying she is living there. A little bit more reliable than youtube commentators, Skippy.

Meghan was two weeks away from giving birth on the queen's birthday so why would she attend? Kate didn't attend parties when she was two weeks away from giving birth either.

Meghan and Harry gave a short interview together at Windsor Castle, talked about their baby and were affectionate to each other too. They are together and their child is real. Stop with the CT rubbish, you sound about 15 years old.

R67, Exactly where is Archie's birth certificate, required by British law to be public, with the standard doctors signatures verifying the exact time and day of birth?

Why are pro photoshoppers calling out the picture of the Queen & Prince P supposedly with MM & H and Doria as an obvious fake? Note the odd juxtaposition of Harry with Prince P, instead of space between the 2 men as would be true of a real representation.

R67 et al, It's OK if you wish to keep your heads buried in the sand re the obvious facts of this massive fraud. I just feel very sorry for you, and I hope you're being paid $$$ to keep on arguing about an obvious series of lies. Remember the book 1984 and "4 legs good, 2 legs better" mantras?

There is no photoshop and the Queen would not risk bringing down the monarchy by falsifying documents.

The BC will be publicly available in 6 weeks. British bcs aren't signed by surgeons.

R69, Why is there a 6 week delay in Archie's birth certificate? His 3 cousins were available almost immediately, and there were 4 doctors' signatures on all of them.

R69, Deny all you wish, call me silly names if you so desire, but the evidence of what I've been stating in these multiple threads is extremely clear. How many more videos do you wish me to link? They document everything that's said.

Queen didn't falsify anything as she wasn't actually at the PR stunt and neither was her husband. Neither QE II nor Prince P were at any of Kate's babies roll outs. Considering that George, Charlotte, and Louis would be ahead of Archie in the Royal line, it wouldn't make sense for the Top Royals to be at Archie's supposed 1st formal presentation to the world and not at Kate's children's.

R69, Why do you continue to ignore the obvious?

R70, birth certificates take 6 weeks to be processed. Stop telling lies about the Cambridge kids' being available 4 days later and having 4 doctors' names.

Meg was pregnant, looked pregnant and now looks post partum. The BRF isn't involved in a shady secret surrogacy.

Louis' BC. Not ONE doctor's signature, let alone FOUR, Skippy fantasist, R70.

R71, MM looked pregnant? Biggest lie ever told on DL what with the constantly changing "moon bumps." What very pregnant woman can successfully walk in extremely high heels? Who can bend to the ground to pet a cute dog, and then get up so easily, completely unassisted?

R71, Do you want me to post the dozens of videos on YouTube that back up my statements? Or the thousands of comments from formerly pregnant but athletic young mothers LOL at MM's extremely obvious fakery? Are you now going to tell me that the other famous celebs also weren't wearing moon bumps but weren't as obvious?

Post away. I'll respond with videos of Kate and other pregnant women walking in very high heels and bending over. Heavily pregnant women can do yoga and gym as well as being able to bend over.

I just debunked your lie about Kate's kids BCs being signed by four doctors. I can debunk any other nonsense you spew.

10 Questions re the Oddities in Archie's Birth

"Cambridge's Tweet" on 6th May at 3.02 a.m. saying :

"Apologies.......the Duke & Duchess of Sussex used the services of a surrogate. We apologise for any misunderstanding."

was astounding!!! but now it's been taken down!!! Must have really riled MM. MM, PH, K.P, B.P. and the whole BRF.........we, the public & the media are really really really really NOT THAT STUPID - we've all seen that notice and believe it to be 'TRUE' and we're sorry you had to "take it down" because of all the lying stories MM & PH were about to/or had ALREADY put out!!! It's a tangled web of lies we weave when first we practice to deceive".

R76 : appointment, diagnosis, prescription for you. The Cambridges is a fake Twitter account. Glad you have no response to Louis' birth certificate.

Lithium will ease your hallucinations.

R77, Speaking of posters who haven't responded to any of MY queries. . .

So what are MM connections to the following as I'm very curious:

Sara Latham new PR for MM has connections with Epstein, Clintons, Blair, Podesta, Harvey W, SoHo, Markus (& possibly more connections) & has known MM at least since 2011?

Also her former BF "Hannah?"

RF will soon announce an annulment, as I predicted long ago. Also I originally predicted a very short marriage.

Also if I really were "Skippy" I'd be talking about charges of TREASON as that's what's being discussed all across the internet. What's going on with MM Canadian passport?

R77, Watch this video questioning WHY there were NO doctors' signatures, unlike on those of baby Archie's cousin Prince Louis.

Wow some people are really looney toons.

Not only are/is the people/person looney toons, but they also love to keep posting like a maniac. I just block them, because they are not even entertaining.

They go from surrogate to fake baby. I mean if there was a use of a surrogate there wouldn't be a need for a fake baby. Right?

This is the poster who is trying to slaughter all these threads.

"Bye Fuglicia" ?

Why do middle-aged Meghan-worshipping women try to sound young by using slang that even a decade ago would have been mocked?

It's very odd.

R81, they never met a conspiracy theory they didn’t like, so don’t expect any logical thinking. I’ve blocked them too...they’re tedious, boring, and most of all-dumb,dumb, dumb.

R82, that's an acc set up to post unflattering pics of the Cambridges.

Ha. Danja Zone is taking names and numbers! Dutchess Of Deep Dark Secrets had a daughter decades ago. It's ON like Donkey Kong!

Jesus Christ-can we return to the topic of tiaras, kilts and gowns or something? I was somewhat shocked at how dull the interiors were from a thread or two ago - with the exception of Clarence House. Charles has surprisingly good taste - or the good sense to hire a competent decorator.

Decades ago, R86? That would be when she was seven, dumbass

R18 Actually, Princess Anne was the first British Royal member to show her newborn to the public when she left the hospital with her newborn son, Peter, in 1977.

R88, Two decades ago MM was seventeen.

R90, yes, and how many people get stuck in a decade they barely experienced? All the Royals and Meg have a timeless, classic style which could belong to any era. Meg hasn't worn anything inappropriate on any of her public outings.

R87, you are on the wrong thread, that's the BRF Gossip thread you are looking for.

It’s so quiet here... something to do with some birth certificate?

With no signature by Prince Henry? Just a typed HARRY? Nah, I think everyone is indulging in Friday drinks, myself!

No Registrar's signature, either.

Paper isn’t real either!

R98, Troll or paid shill? Either way this video's for you. Please tell me if it resembles Prince Louis'.

Well, the birth certificate is here and looks exactly like Louis'. But of course, tinhats are going to say it is fake and accuse the royal family and registrar of falsifying public records ( a crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison).

Tinhat Catchphrases: paid shill, photocopy, silicon, different time stamp, weather wrong, babies don't, pregnant women don't, they've hired a child actor, treason, prison.

LOL Meghan’s occupation is listed as “Princess of the United Kingdom”. Maybe that’s what Harry didn’t want people to see. He must know how absolutely ridiculous that is.

^ She’s a DUCHESS. And even that is a courtesy title.

She is indeed a Princess but styled a Duchess, like Kate. And that birth certificate could well be a true and accurate reproduction of the original but it couldn't be presented as an official, certified copy without the signature of of the Registrar.

But yes, you're right, all of MeAgain's titles are courtesy titles until she becomes a citizen of the UK.

Another view, more detailed, re Archie's official papers.

Skippies are incandescent with rage over that certificate and Meghan being called a Princess.

R105, Why the over-the-top constant exaggeration? How much are you being paid to write such ridiculous nonsense?

DL loves to make fun of obvious PR tricks & machinations. Shill, you must be new here. Lighten up.

R99 spot on. I noticed those phrases in all the other delightful threads.

Where's the original birth certificate? I demand to see the original birth certificate.

Skippie CT-ers are just basic Trump birthers at the end of the day, and they are often so dumb that they believe in false flag attacks as well and will rant about crisis actors. They always turn around and accuse anyone who disagrees with them of being 'paid to post', 'paid shill', 'obvious PR.'

In their egomania, they believe they and their social media posts are far more significant than they actually are. Nobody in a professional capacity gives a fuck about what some anonymous posters on a gay message board are talking about.

Happy 1 Year Anniversary to the Duke & Duchess of Sussex. One down, a lifetime of love, peace & happiness to go. Together.

[quote]Nobody in a professional capacity gives a fuck about what some anonymous posters on a gay message board are talking about.

Then why are you in a perpetual snit about it?

R111, Excellent response. Wish I had your gift of written expression.

Why is it that the batshit crazy conspiracy theorists only question the legitimacy of black people?

Hmm.... I wonder why?

Never the Tronald Dumps of the world. Only the Obamas and the Meghans.

Quelle surprise.

I wish this thread would be shut down.

It's nothing more than a place for "birther" conspiracy theorists to spew their bile on Meghan Markle.

Seriously, enough is ENOUGH!

Kindly F off, @R114 this is DATALOUNGE a decades-old bitchy GAY GOSSIP BOARD. You know where the door is you won't be controlling DL!!

Infamous @torontopaper ...seems like this could be Piers Morgan, dunno...

Danja Zone!

R116, as if Piers Morgan has the time to run the ridiculous birther account Torontopaper. You really think he has the time to write dumbass posts like 'darling, the clock is ticking?' over and over again?

All the Skippies are also Larries, Havenettes, Kaylors and false flags nuts.

R118, Exactly what are "Havenettes?" Not even Urban Dictionary has a definition listed.

R118, Over generalization in the extreme? Have you actually met ALL of the "Skippies?" Why do you keep trying to shut down a discussion on DL when there are obviously those who are at least somewhat curious following 2 different threads on MM? You must admit it's a very light, even amusing topic of the machinations of MM & the Royal family moon bumps and all.

Havenettes are also known as Robstens. They think lesbian Kristen Stewart is secretly married to Pattinson and they have four klds.

'Over generalization in the extreme? Have you actually met ALL of the "Skippies?"

Okay, R119, looks like I'm talking to a Skippie now. All of them are the same - stupid conspiracy theorists who genuinely think Meg faked a pregnancy and is currently waiting for the results of a DNA test to prove Harry isn't the dad, when she will be imprisoned for 'high treason'.

Skippy is a retired 70 year old with plenty of time on her hands. Her followers are a similar age or much younger, teenagers who get drawn into all the Tumblr conspiracies. Which category do you fall into, R119?

Skippies remind me so much of Larries. They also said Tomlinson's kid was a doll and tried to pick holes in his birth certificate. They are still waiting for a DNA test over three years later. The Skippies are now also blogging furiously about a paternity test.

These Meghan conspiracy theorists need to be locked up in a loonie bin.

Indefinitely.

They suffer from severe mental illness.

R120, Silly to think Harry's not the bio-dad. Sure he supposedly joked about that fact. Likely he was casting aspersions on his wife and the state of his marriage.

Don't follow any other young teen couples you mentioned but assume the vast majority of celeb PR is less than 100% accurate. Entertaining to read DL comparisons at times of truth vs fiction. MM is no longer a Hollywood actress but a Royal. Standards should be different.

By the way my adopted grandmother & mother, now sadly deceased, were directly related to the Royal family. as well as working with Vogue when it was still "Vogue." Hence my affinity. They would have been horrified at MM refusal to always wear pantyhose/tights, not wear proper undergarments and a slip when being publicly filmed, and repeatedly voicing controversial political opinions.

R123, I'm sure they would also have been horrified by Kate's multiple flying skirt moments. When will she learn to weight the hem of her dresses?

'Don't follow any other young teen couples you mentioned but assume the vast majority of celeb PR is less than 100% accurate'

A tinhat has spoken.

R123, your comment about pantyhose ensures you are old, old, old.

R126, I don't always wear a slip either but would do so, and weight all of my skirts & dresses, IF I were a member of the Royal Family and constantly in the public eye. Pantyhose was ALWAYS required in the very conservative law offices and at Bellagio where I've previously worked. Also on ALL movie sets, as I tend to wear shorter skirts. Has nothing to do with one's age but due to long held values.

R125, I've only followed one, not young, actor after meeting him on a movie set. That was enough to immediately tell that celeb PR was a sham. Skimming DL threads filled in most of the truth via the rest of Hollywood. I walked out of my 1st Twighlight movie after a few minutes, and never read any of the books.

@R119 the most dedicated MM stans are actually BOTS imagine if you will 100 Eastern European females from the ages of 16-30 in a warehouse with many browsers open commenting all day. Johnny Depp uses a similar bot farm.

Are you aware that MM consulted divorce lawyers while in NY? Also RE agents? Likely she prefers CA living to NY. Can't see MM spending much time in Africa, even if that would be her husband's preference.

R129, you are hilarious, presenting some vague internet rumour about M consulting a divorce lawyer as fact.

I love how tinhat conspiracy theories are always so elaborate, but fundamentally rotate around the desperation to 'prove' their chosen celebrity boyfriend has not had sex.

That's what it boils down to, isn't it? Sex. And it's completely illogical.

Assuming that the tinhat's basic premise (that Meghan or Sophie Cumberbatch or the 1D babymama or whomever, is a narcissistic lying gold-digger intent on using the poor naive helpless man for money and fame) is accurate. Why on earth would they create elaborate criminal masterplans involving faked pregnancies, bribing registrars, passing dolls off as real people, and vast conspiracy theories that would require hundreds of powerful people keeping silent forever?

When the alternate is just... getting some guy to stick his dick inside them for two minutes (and let's face it, getting a straight guy to stick his dick inside a woman is the easiest thing on earth).

If the tinhats wanted to create vaguely realistic 'theories' they'd stick to portraying Meghan as some golddigger who got Harry drunk so she could get knocked up. Creating wild fantasies about fake doll babies just screams "I CAN'T HANDLE THE IDEA OF MY FANTASY BOYFRIEND HAVING SEX."

R131 you’re so right! What the hell is logic doing on this thread? And r129, I’ve blocked you, as most people have; if you’re going to present idiotic gossip you made up in your little head, at least do it with some wit and believability.

Tinhats are severely sexually repressed and suffer from internalised misogyny. That’s why so many tinhats become obsessed with secret gay relationships, it allows them to project their sexual needs and fantasies onto a pairing that is “safe”.

The Larries are the prime example of this. They spend every waking moment writing the most explicit pornographic fanfiction about two teenage boys, yet if anyone in the fandom posts “Harry is hot” or something they get called a slut who’s objectifying the guy and run out on a rail.

Tinhats have a massive problem with female sexuality. That’s why, without exception, every single woman who is a tinhat target is accused of being a prostitute.

What's a skippie?

Skippy is the username of a crazy person on Tumblr who believes that Meghan is the secret child of a Rothschild and that the Queen is plotting against her, that the Queen personally arranged an entire fake wedding ceremony to best Meghan, that Meghan has been arrested for treason and is currently being held prisoner in the Tower of London (lol). And she believes that the Royal Family are communicating with her and that she is their mouthpiece. Her blog's bio literally says "Here on behalf of the British Royal Family." She's apparently an elderly woman and she spends all day every day sockpuppeting on every forum and gossip blog she can find, to spread her delusions. Because of her "Skippy" has become a catch-all term for the anti-Meghan tinhats.

A "sugar" is apparently a term the 'royal family fandom' created to mean a fan of a particular royal, but tinhats use it to mean anyone who doesn't believe Meghan Markle faked her pregnancy, shot JFK and kidnapped the Lindbergh baby.

Oh my lord, R135. Thanks for that.

I had no idea that the crazy was so deep.

W and W for R135.

You should post on the British Royal Family 59 thread. Your eloquent logic is desperately needed by the racist MM detractors and Skippies on there.

I thought Sugar might have racist connotations. I saw some of them write it 'Sugah'.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Regrets my link above isn't working doesn't go to the direct article.

R131, R133, Where do you get such a silly notion that MM & Harry have not had sex multiple times? There are other valid grounds for an annulment, and to fake a pregnancy.

David Bowie and Iman's daughter, Lexi with her boyfriend

Maybe but fixation with denying that their idol had sex is the only reason for tinhats to invent bizarre theories about surrogates and fake pregnancies.

The fact every single woman who dates or marries a man with tinhat fans is accused of faking her pregnancies pretty much proves it.

The Markle tinhats also insist the Queen assigned bodyguards to watch Harry 24/7 to ensure Meghan was never alone with him, which is obviously code for “ensure they never have sex.”

Nothing, absolutely nothing, bothers tinhats more than the idea of a man fucking another woman.

Big fucking deal, r139. I guarantee just about every poster on this thread has cheated at least once, and don’t get me started on the BRF.

R143, You sound as delusional as the most bizarre fans. No, those of us who are at all observant can clearly tell who's actually pregnant vs who is clearly using a moon bump. Next you'll claim Beyonce's followers believe she's never, ever had sex with Jay-Z as she's obviously faked at leas one of her pregnancies.

R139, More so, many celebs have open relationships and agreements of various kinds. Who are we to judge?

Anyone who thinks Meghan faked her pregnancy is operating a quite a few steps away from reality. Period.

R146, Call those who disagree with your point of view whatever you wish but there's far more evidence MM faked her pregnancy with moonbumps than any other celeb, even more so than Amal Clooney. End of story.

There is literally zero “evidence.” Just complete and utter fantasy from racist trolls and obsessed stans with no grip on reality, who can’t bear that a woman they despise (for basically no reason) married Harry and had a child with him.

I bet you think the Queen is conducting a DNA test as we speak.

Wow r147, did you stop taking your lithium? Just because you can concoct various scenarios in your mind, doesn’t make them real.

^Btw block r147 and take a look... he/she (has to be a frau) is a one-woman fantasy machine.

R148, R149, R150, I've never, ever taken Lithium or any other mind altering substances, nor have I ever smoked anything, and I do not get drunk. No need for any of the above if one's focused on healthy eating. Yes being a woman I know what a truly pregnant woman looks like. MM provides endless amusement with her try hard antics.

Thought MM was a breath of fresh air initially when she announced her engagement. However personally I would NEVER want to have married Harry, prince or not, it wouldn't have mattered to me. Still MM doesn't seem to have prepared very well for her role as a member of the BRF. Kate is more compliant. So it's ever entertaining to watch the PR show.

R148, Since you claim to know everything about MM, would she now be staying with Amal Clooney in Lake Como?

For the previous posters who appear to be blind, please watch the linked video.

R151, you are comedy gold. There is zero evidence that any celeb has ever worn a fucking moonbump to fake a pregancy. When celebs hire surrogates THEY TELL US because it isn't shameful or something to be hidden. Amal, Beyonce and Meghan - all women of dual heritage, you ugly racist - were pregnant.

R148, like the Larries, the dumb CT on this thread has cycled through moon bump, fake birth certificate and now thinks the Queen is going to announce the results of a DNA test any moment now.

R154, Pardon me? Since when has the Queen allowed a DNA test for anyone in the Royal family? There have been wild rumors for generations of switched babies due to inherited generic abnormalities re inbreeding and sterile men and she could have easily put the rumors to rest permanently. Yet the Queen has never authorized a DNA test.

R153, Thank you so much for acknowledging my comedic talent.

Of course it’s a deplorable in the video at r152. Loon and dumb. You in danger girl!

R155 There's no need to do a DNA test. You can tell by the royal inbred faces that they look like their ancestors. Beatrice looks like a young Queen Victoria with her bug eyes, chubby face and weak chin. Queen Elizabeth II looks like her grandmother, Queen Mary. Even Prince Charles bears some resemblance to a former Prince of Wales, a young King Edward VII, with his long face and weak chin.

Dripdrop is patting self on back

Tornontopaper is like, na na na na na, beeyotch!

R158, The frog memes & moving characters are adorbs but can you please explain the justification for bringing up "treason?" WTF?

Was told MM somehow knows at least one of the Bronfman sisters. However knowing her desire to socially network among the rich & famous that wouldn't be surprising for her (or for any other actress on the rise) to try and get an intro. Also didn't know that there was a Bronfman & Justin Trudeau connection.

R159, Now that linked info is really strange. Miles Markle and not Thomas Markle is MM's bio-dad?

Again the discussion of TREASON but no justification for it. DNA tests? What is going on here?

Exactly what did they say is wrong with the Archie's birth announcement? That MM put it out and not officials at The Palace? Entertaining, and I've never been into Soap Operas.

By the way do you know how MM 1st met Obama?

@R160I can't explain any of it, really. I do find it all amusing. And I am intrigued that such an attention whore has had only one public event in over 2 or 3 months. Kate was out 3 weeks after Louie's birth. I do believer Lord Overlord has put her shitty public appearances to a stop.

Did she meet Obama by Murkin, is that his name? Or Burkle?

R162, Who is "Lord Overlord?" Yes the entire MM saga is light entertainment, and a needed distraction in view of the machinations with Iran & the Mid East.

Lord Geidt @R160

Torontopaper is insanely funny with her cod Shakespearen couplets. When the baby was born and after the birth cert. was produced, she was silent with shock for days, as was Drip Drop.

Only 80 year old Skippy kept posting, insisting that 'HM' would be demanding a DNA test soon (as she still is). Skippy remembered her time as a Larrie when they all thought TMZ were going to force Louis Tomlinson to publish his paternity test in the world's press and she knew how to proceed. TP and DD were stymied.

I do find tinhats hugely entertaining, but your arguments are always laughably easy to shoot down. MM had no engagements at all during the last six weeks of her pregnancy, unlike Kate. She is a 37 year old first time mum, and she is not the future queen. These dull royal engagements where she gets attention from the same limited sources are clearly nowhere near as appealing to her as you CTs like to think, and she has chosen to take an extended maternity leave, as is her right.

I know you crackpots think she is under house arrest/sectioned/imprisoned.

R166, Some online MM investigative hosts said MM was staying at Amal Clooney's in Lake Como.

R166, she won't have been able to get a passport for the baby yet. Don't you ever question your own racism which leads you to question the integrity of women of colour only?

Even LSA calls MM "mixed" and "White-identifying" so I don't know why you're falsely accusing me of racism.

To answer your question, since being on DL and learning the truth about many different things I now question the integrity of men and women of all races, especially if they're in the spotlight.

Visit the Pastor Davey threads and you'll see my many posts really questioning his integrity, morality, honesty, hubris, and much, much more.

Skippy (who is probably r147 herself) is convinced Meghan is being held prisoner in the Tower of London.

Because sure, an ancient ruin that’s one of the most popular tourist attractions in the UK is absolutely where one of the most famous women in the country would be held, it’s not like London has actual prisons or anything.

(I know it’s delusion to think she’s in prison, the Tower of London just gives it an amazing level of cluelessness. Obviously none of these people have ever been here.)

R169, true. They've watched The Boleyn Girl too many times and think that the Tower is still a functional prison.

R168, so you're one of those radical CTs who believes in all the CTs, eh? Fake flags, Larry, Kaylor, Charmie, Gay Sam Heughan, Gay Shawn et al?

R170, I took the posts about baring MM to The Tower as an analogy, meaning she should expect a divorce, annulment, or just a rather cold shoulder from the BRF. Clear message from Day-1 re the Queen who designed her Coat of Arms.

R170, Who is Larry, Kaylor, Charmie, Gay Shawn? I recognize Sam Heughan's name from The Highlander but only saw clips of that particular movie online. Love the Queen songs in it. Since PR isn't accurate I generally only skim what's on DL for amusement.

As I said before I have a direct connect to the BRF through my "adopted" grandmother who's a direct descendant. Also a previous love was also a direct descendant of the BRF with his name written down in an official book in England. Hence my interest in the Royals.

R171, an annulment, really? On what grounds? We're not in Henry Viii's time. There is no sign of a divorce, either, or a cold shoulder.

R172, Various reports from multiple sources that one of the reasons MM wanted her baby shower to be in NY is that she could see a divorce lawyer free from the BRF prying eyes. Her goal is to move to CA and not Africa, as the Queen suggested.

Does anyone think Africa would be on the table if everything with MM & Harry were A OK? MM has yet to hire a nanny, cook for the baby, and other support personnel. Wonder why?

MM supposed baby doctor named.

She won't be able to take Archie to LA with her if she is divorced, so I doubt very much that that is her goal.

Obviously they hire personnel through agencies as well as through advertisements. You won't see every appointment they make.

F175, MM doesn't really strike me as the maternal type. There are rumors online MM left a daughter Noel with her half-sister and then that woman's mother so that she could pursue her performing career. Very pregnant pictures of MM in a long black dress exist online. Her marriage to Noel's father, now a lawyer, was annulled.

Makes sense MM would leave Archie behind to revise her acting career, and get away from the many rules & restrictions of the BRF. i could not see this marriage lasting solely because MM is not the super submissive, conformist type her role of a lifetime required. Being American and a very modern woman obviously she was going to repeatedly butt heads with the overly traditional, even old-fashioned institution that is the BRF. How many times was she warned that it was strictly taboo to even discuss controversial politics in the US or in Britain?

Even if some on DL think her degree of talent & age are hindrances, her world-wide fame would now guarantee her acting roles & appearance/promo fees for productions needing extra free pap attention to sell their projects. That is until she found a super rich elite new partner to support her lifestyle. It's been done before.

R175, Skippies with an agenda have suggested that if Prince Harry for whatever reason is not the bio father of Archie then the BRF would have no claim nor an ability to keep the baby in England.

Does either Harry or William have secret out-of-wedlock children? With such an active libido starting from a young age, as would be the norm for young men in the BRF, how would Harry have successfully prevented any "accidents" knowing that some pretty young women seek a lifetime meal ticket?

What are grounds for an annulment in England and with the BRF? Would failure to disclose vital personal info be a cause? Did MM lead Prince Harry she was already pregnant and was that the reason for the hurried marriage? Lots of wild rumors online, and who knows what is true.

[quote] how would Harry have successfully prevented any "accidents" knowing that some pretty young women seek a lifetime meal ticket?

Umm, Condoms??

[quote]Did MM lead Prince Harry she was already pregnant and was that the reason for the hurried marriage?

Of course, it was a 12-month pregnancy!

You people need some serious help.

F178, Obviously MM would have had to tell Prince Harry that she then had a miscarriage which is very common with some women. Now how could she have announced her pregnancy at Harry's cousin's wedding and then actually give birth on May 6? The dates don't coincide.

R179, Why are you even reading this thread? To prove to yourself that you're not 100% totally powerless? Why don't you have the intelligence to block those posters with whom you disagree?

R176, if she abandoned her baby to return to LA seeking acting roles, she'd be viewed as a heartless bitch. Not happening.

There is no proof that she ever had a child. Her weight fluctuates, like most women. I think she's been ready to be a mother for a long time, and can now enjoy that role in luxury.

@R181, bots. Eastern Europeans, etc. crammed in a warehouse trolling as stans for a brief living Johnny Deep also hires them go to any JD thread at the Daily Mail, you will see them in action, but bots can't sanitize everything. Celebs buy bots who like twitter, youtube and instagram pages hundreds of thousands at a time or bots who actively troll, stan bots are the most persistent and crazy, they're on the attack here, Radar and LSA but get shouted down at Redditt and TMZ. It's just hammering their opinion and basic bullying. I bet they get a kick out of causing all that drama for a living.

R183, Eastern European bots with immaculate English like those defending Meghan on this thread? I think not.

Your own English is horrendous, so perhaps you are the bot?

I mean, I’m in Shepherd’s Bush. Pretty sure that’s not Eastern Europe though I did find an excellent Polish supermarket the other day.

R185, I'm sure I've talked to you before, on the London heatwave threads or similar. You were scathing because I don't live in central London and called me 'tube guy'.

I don’t think that was me, but I’m very sorry if it was!

Sainted Kate used to be a yacht girl!

The corporate clients loved her, especially the way she always seemed to be showing off her slender legs in tight blue shorts as she served gin and tonics and lunch. She was working as a deckhand on 72ft sailing boats in the Solent, looking after important clients for mighty companies such as Barclays, BT, Nokia, Toshiba and Volkswagen.

This was Catherine Middleton at 19, doing her first - and some might waspishly say her only - real job.

Her boss during these three months of her gap year between leaving fee-paying Marlborough College and going up to St Andrews University was former round-the-world yachtsman Sir Chay Blyth.

‘Most of the talk about her concerned her very tight shorts,’ chortles Sir Chay, 70, who ran the Southampton-based hospitality business.

‘She was an attractive girl who never allowed herself to be distracted by the comments and got on with her job. We had other girls, mainly students, working as corporate crew members and some of them were a pain in the a*** complaining about this and that. But Kate was not one of them.’

‘There were all kinds of shenanigans among the girls who came down to work on corporate hospitality days, a lot of going out and drinking.

‘On the boat, it was a case of: “Kate, please scrub the floors” - but sometimes it was: “Kate, would you mind not standing by that hatch when you are serving because it’s a bit revealing for anyone below deck.”