Mick Jagger v Keith Richards

In what way?

As a human

Yeh, agree with R1 - better at what?

If your question is about musicianship, I'd say they're about even. While it's true Mick mostly writes the words and Keith mostly writes the music, that's not always the case. And, if you look at their solo efforts, neither is very good without the other. They bicker like an old married couple, but can still create magic when they're not being lazy. And, given their various addictions and crazy lifestyles, most folks are surprised they're both still performing and making big bucks. While their shows are still fun, they're mostly just reliving their past to their boomer audience. I've been a fan since 1969 and last saw them a few years ago. The song tempos are slower, but they can still satisfy their fans.

Jagger was never an addict....a drug addict anyway

r5 hahahaha

How dare you, OP. They are both gods.

Mick is a lot more sane and sober than Keef it seems.

Eh, Keith is funnier.

Jagger gave up the drugs long before Keith did, and he didn’t booze away the 80s with Ron Wood.

As a human, Keith by several lengths.

Jagger

poll next time OP

KEITH was TOO GOOD to ever do a background vocal on any of my records, so fuck 'im.

keef for the win

Keith survived falling out of coconut tree and no doubt managed to hold onto the cigarette in his mouth when he did. He is clearly God.

“Mick is my wife, whether I like it or not. We can’t get a divorce.” - Keith Richards

R15 good point. He plays entire concerts without losing the smoke.

Now I’m torn.

Jagger is saner and shrewder, but Keith is zany and fun.

Keith, if you're measuring. We took a pole.

OP, can you make a Lennon VS McCartney poll?

R19, can you girls not spell, or do you really mean it?

^^^ it was a play on words re: pole.

Glad you got it R22. Wake up, R21!