We had on here a few days back, a home in Indianapolis that was crammed full of stuff and it felt quite jarring. I came across this house and while it's fanciful, it also feels restful. Are we looking at a a style setter, or do you feel it doesn't work?
Tasteful Friends: Is this eclectic done right?
|by Anonymous||reply 49||Last Tuesday at 6:14 PM|
Holy Hell. Who designed the room in picture number 12? What color is that? And who is the poof hanging on the wall? Are they going to try and tell us that's a relative?
|by Anonymous||reply 1||Last Monday at 1:04 PM|
It looks big from the outside, but is very divided-up and small on the inside.
One of the rooms (the one R1 highlighted) is surprisingly gaudy for such a rustic place.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||Last Monday at 1:07 PM|
I think it’s charming
|by Anonymous||reply 3||Last Monday at 1:11 PM|
No. Eclectic doesn’t mean “throw a bunch of shit together and call it a day.” You still need balance in scale and proportion and common threads in color and form.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||Last Monday at 1:12 PM|
eh, no. Some rooms verge on shabby chic or md-century, such a mish mash with no direction. The rooms are too small for this "look". That kitchen really sucks too, I hate it when people take antique furniture and turn it into counter tops. It's also been for sale since 2013, so there must be something wrong with it other than the way it looks.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||Last Monday at 1:15 PM|
Actually this makes the Indianapolis home appear very well done. While this is a lovely property, many of the furnishings are not appropriate for the style of decor most suitable. The mid-century and other modern pieces do not bode well in my opinion. It would be better in a more traditional New England styles.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||Last Monday at 1:20 PM|
Agreed it is a lovely property, but the house exterior (tiny upstairs windows) and interior border on ghastly...
|by Anonymous||reply 7||Last Monday at 1:32 PM|
I'm curious as to your thoughts on suitability. R6. Because the house dates from 1780, does it need to be furnished exclusively to that period? I am definitely pro-preservation, but I think it's important not to keep something trapped in amber like a museum.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||Last Monday at 1:36 PM|
Tis very connecticut
|by Anonymous||reply 9||Last Monday at 1:37 PM|
I actually like it. I love the house (living room?) opening up onto the sun room, very nice. The blue bedroom is a bit eye-searing, but nothing paint won't fix.
I agree the bits of mid-century modern furniture are out of place, but that's a small thing.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||Last Monday at 1:43 PM|
Looks like 2 gays decorated it out of years of weekends spent at "antique barns" and thrift shops. Why is a porch lantern serving as the lustre over a glass patio table, for 4, in the dining room with 6 likable enough chairs? And so on. In fact one of them surely owned a a shabby chic shop that failed after 5 years, in the late 90's. They are hopefully in their mid to late 60s, which would explain what has happened here.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||Last Monday at 1:46 PM|
Hi R8. I, myself, would decorate this in a more classic New England style. I would use more classic pieces with fine antique pieces mixed in. Because of the home’s geographic location I think a few very tasteful pieces that are authentic to when the home was built would be a nice touch, but I wouldn’t be looking for hoop skirts and bonnets anywhere.
As I said, I think the home is lovely. The mid century pieces are questionable to me but many others may love it like that.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||Last Monday at 1:48 PM|
I'm 6'3" so I am instantly aware of all the low ceilings. OK for a summer cottage or weekend getaway
|by Anonymous||reply 13||Last Monday at 1:48 PM|
R11 ding ding ding! The winner.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||Last Monday at 1:50 PM|
I like the wood beams on the ceilings.
I don't like the red walls.
Is it haunted?
|by Anonymous||reply 15||Last Monday at 1:50 PM|
It looks like they just tried to cram modern and traditional together, with it really just looking like traditional with bright splashes of color. They should've stuck to one or the other, this mixture doesn't work for me.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||Last Monday at 1:55 PM|
Check out the ugly, pointless abstract painting in pics 5 and 7. Might as well be the corporate art featured in Gremlins 2. I wonder how much that set them back.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||Last Monday at 2:01 PM|
Yes, why stainless steel in that kitchen in CT?
Who painted each chair in the sun porch a whimsical color? Hopefully a nice neighbor boy, old bohemian broke branch of a good family, sent as a day student to Kent School?
|by Anonymous||reply 18||Last Monday at 2:01 PM|
Tacky gay 90s decor
|by Anonymous||reply 19||Last Monday at 2:05 PM|
I do like their table lamps.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||Last Monday at 2:11 PM|
I recognize that place. Overlooks the river
|by Anonymous||reply 21||Last Monday at 2:16 PM|
[quote] Who painted each chair in the sun porch a whimsical color?
Lol, that jumped out at me too.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||Last Monday at 2:44 PM|
I think both house and decor are pretty good. However the photographs are not flattering; they are your basic realtor pics which try to include as much as possible.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||Last Monday at 3:00 PM|
I know that house. It's on Route 7 in Kent Connecticut. Very busy road, trucks and motorcycles on weekends. Route 7 goes from Norwalk by the sound all the way up to the Berkshires in Mass. It's one of those charming houses that is never lived in for very long as it's always for sale. Very noisy.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||Last Monday at 3:13 PM|
r1, I used to date a designer who called that color "tongue."
|by Anonymous||reply 25||Last Monday at 3:20 PM|
Nothing eclectic about the place except the hideous vermillion walls in that one room. Once that's painted over and the furniture is replaced, you've got a very nice old-fashioned house with lots of lovely hardwood accents. Plenty of bedrooms, nice place for a family.
Nice, but unremarkable.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||Last Monday at 3:29 PM|
I couldn't live there, it would drive me crazy, low ceilings like that are just too claustrophobic and I am not nearly as tall as R13. There is more than a foot space above my doors and windows.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||Last Monday at 4:39 PM|
I sort of like the house, it does seem very Connecticuty. They sure went wild with all the color and not in the best way. My guess is that it was crammed full of much more crap, the Realtor made the owners call in Trish the Stager to edit some crap and then bring in different crap to make it more marketable.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||Last Monday at 4:53 PM|
Some of these rooms look like a pediatrician's waiting room.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||Last Monday at 5:19 PM|
I like the kitchen, the trophies room is really tacky.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||Last Monday at 5:36 PM|
I like it.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||Last Monday at 5:44 PM|
Boy you bitches are fickle. It's not my taste exactly, but I appreciate what they've done,
|by Anonymous||reply 32||Last Monday at 5:56 PM|
This room gives me a headache. Notice the huge, round table near the window. Obviously too big for the space. Knotted pine can make a room look stressful.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||Last Monday at 5:58 PM|
This room is set up to look like a coffee counter at Starbucks.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||Last Monday at 5:59 PM|
This room is super ugly with the pastel orange walls. Chairs don't match the table. Room not inviting at all.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||Last Monday at 6:02 PM|
We've seen much worse on DL
|by Anonymous||reply 36||Last Monday at 6:05 PM|
|by Anonymous||reply 37||Last Monday at 6:05 PM|
I like it but would redecorate.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||Last Monday at 6:09 PM|
R24 , is Indianapolis in Connecticut ?
|by Anonymous||reply 39||Last Monday at 6:15 PM|
R33, I think that room just needs a lot less stuff in it.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||Last Monday at 6:27 PM|
What does that even mean, R39?
|by Anonymous||reply 41||Last Monday at 7:01 PM|
Tacky, claustrophobic piece of shit. From the outside, it looks like a matchstick house with a cheap-looking roof. Ponderosa pine walls? Please. At least there wasn't a Sputnik chandelier mixed in that mess.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||Last Monday at 7:07 PM|
|by Anonymous||reply 43||Last Monday at 7:08 PM|
I like the house and all flaws are easily fixed, except those distressed ceiling beams. It just looks like crappy wood, it doesn’t look antique.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||Last Monday at 7:20 PM|
Shady Pines, Ma!
|by Anonymous||reply 45||Last Monday at 7:29 PM|
Nobody paints their dining room the same shade as Pepto Bismol and puts up "art" that's a cross between impressionism and cubism unless it's a cow getting milked. I can't tell. It's awful. It doesn't belong in a dining room. It doesn't belong in a barn; it would spook the cows.
it's a gut job. It makes my gut hurt.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||Last Monday at 7:29 PM|
Looks like a great place to rent, for a weekend.
|by Anonymous||reply 47||Last Monday at 7:40 PM|
This is only a weekend or vacation home, right? I mean, we’re all on the same page that this is a second home and not a primary residence, right?
I hate all the furniture but it’s fine for weekend or vacation.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||Last Monday at 8:06 PM|
Why would it have to be a weekend place, R48? Seems like it could go either way,
|by Anonymous||reply 49||Last Tuesday at 6:14 PM|