Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Why is Leaving Neverland still a thing?

James Safechuck (the only semi-credible accuser) claimed he was abused every day--

in the beginning of his "relationship" with Jackson (around 7)--

in a place it was revealed didn't exist until he was 16.

When he's said repeatedly all "abuse" stopped at 14.

Why is this still a thing?

by Anonymousreply 136May 21, 2019 7:14 AM

Yeah except it actually did.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1April 15, 2019 1:37 PM

give it up, blanket.

by Anonymousreply 2April 15, 2019 1:37 PM

It's still a thing because sad cases like you keep creating threads to defend a dead pedophile, 15 and counting!. Every sane person accepts Jackson for what he was, a pedophile, now a dead pedophile, we are content with that result. it's only demented fans like yourself of the Brenda and Alice variety who are making it a 'thing'

by Anonymousreply 3April 15, 2019 1:37 PM

Because you keep bringing it up.

by Anonymousreply 4April 15, 2019 1:37 PM

Oprah and the media are pushing the narrative. They were never really fair to MJ during his lifetime, and were pissed off that every time they would run a negative campaign he would do a concert and hee-hee his way into 20 million more fans. Now that he's dead, they are trying again. Even if it means getting behind two people whose stories can't even charitably be true.

by Anonymousreply 5April 15, 2019 1:51 PM

R1 Safechuck said when the abuse first started it was every day in the upper room of a train station with a bedroom. He provided pictures of said train station. Notice Dan Reed didn't say "there was another train station" but the "end of the abuse" was wrong. Which of course, makes me wonder how Jackson traded them out at 13/14 if he was abusing Safechuck everyday at 17.

by Anonymousreply 6April 15, 2019 1:53 PM

MJ was hiding in plain sight. Classic pedo grooming behavior. The detractors wouldn't believe anything short of actual videotapes of the crimes. Even then i'm sure the same people would claim it was doctored.

A kid testified about MJ's penis markings. How on earth would he know this?

by Anonymousreply 7April 15, 2019 1:56 PM

R7 He described MJ as circumcised, when the guy wasn't? I'm no specialist but guessing a guy with vitiligo has skin patches on his genitals isn't exactly a 5 point match. Not to mention the claim was never corroborated.

by Anonymousreply 8April 15, 2019 1:58 PM

R7 no one here cares anymore. You and the other dude have started 50 threads about the same topic. At some point, we all wonder if you just secretly like talking about the topic of pedophilia. Get help.

by Anonymousreply 9April 15, 2019 1:59 PM

R7 Even if he was an abuser, it doesn't really affect that it's impossible for these guys to have been abused when/where they claimed. I mean they've lost 4 lawsuits now. And owe 70k+ to the estate in legal fees. Very low hanging fruit. The would be credible "victims" are still saying nothing happened and these two are liars.

by Anonymousreply 10April 15, 2019 2:00 PM

R9 Pot calling the kettle black

by Anonymousreply 11April 15, 2019 2:01 PM

Although I agree in the long run this has zero effect on the Jackson family's bottom line. Now that these two have lost all of their lawsuits, they don't even have the money to pay off their families for participating in this nonsense.

by Anonymousreply 12April 15, 2019 2:03 PM

It's just you R6 , R5 , R8, R10 , R11 , OP attempting to wipe the shit from pedophile Jackson's dirty reputation.None of your Brenda/Alice 'fan' conspiracy theories or Aha! loopholes have had any impact, but you continue pumping out the same pathetic bilge day after day. Any respectable performer embarrassed to have 'fans' like you. Jackson is thankfully dead so we don't have to put up with his sickly mewling and pawing at pretty young boys in public and that makes the world a much better place.

by Anonymousreply 13April 15, 2019 2:03 PM

You are so obsessed R12 etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc you are even still posting in the closed Neverland 14 thread which you've managed to keep open to 623 replies, you are tragic and a failure as you have changed nobody's mind and just succeeded in making Jackson more of a sick joke.

by Anonymousreply 14April 15, 2019 2:07 PM

R13 R14 We know it's you, the same person who had created 15 threads about this nonsense documentary calling other people "obsessed."

You make Michael Jackson and his accusers look completely sane.

by Anonymousreply 15April 15, 2019 3:02 PM

But nearly two weeks since Leaving Neverland premiered, Michael Jackson’s posthumous career is showing few signs of major distress. Leaving Neverland arrived on the heels of Surviving R. Kelly, the Lifetime docuseries that detailed years of allegations of abuse against R. Kelly and ultimately led to a new slate of criminal charges and an end to the singer’s longtime deal with RCA. Obviously, Jackson, who died in 2009, cannot face new criminal charges (he was acquitted on child molestation charges in 2005), but his estate remains a massive business.

Last year, Sony Entertainment spent $250 million to secure the distribution rights to Jackson’s music for another seven years. The label has not issued a statement since Leaving Neverland premiered. As far as merchandise and image rights go, Jamie Salter, the founder and CEO of ABG, which manages non-musical licensing for Jackson and other celebrity estates, told Rolling Stone a few days before Leaving Neverland premiered that he hadn’t received a single call from any concerned companies.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16April 15, 2019 3:04 PM

It's the lottery mentality. Everyone wants a yuge check that would set them up for life.

I bet if the fellas were both already multi-millionaires we wouldn't be having this discussion.

by Anonymousreply 17April 15, 2019 3:08 PM

^^^^

by Anonymousreply 18April 15, 2019 3:08 PM

R15 Your Trump shit won't work here you loser, accusing people of doing what you do won't work, like it didn't when you were trying to throw the JABBA nonsense around, feel free to check my posting history , I've never started a threads on anything, you are a liar . Your tactics are as big a failure as your attempt to clean up dirty Jackson. The Trump thing suits you as I also notice you and your kind using 'cuck' as an insult.

by Anonymousreply 19April 15, 2019 3:09 PM

R19 is deranged

by Anonymousreply 20April 15, 2019 3:10 PM

R19 Did MJ touch you too?

by Anonymousreply 21April 15, 2019 3:10 PM

Trying it again Brenda R19 , it doesn't work, your insanity leads you to very dark places.

by Anonymousreply 22April 15, 2019 3:11 PM

R22 ...Sure, Jan

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23April 15, 2019 3:12 PM

I'll be keeping an eye on you Brenda R21 etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc and making sure to show up what a lunatic you are

by Anonymousreply 24April 15, 2019 3:13 PM

R24 You really sound mentally unstable in your replies.

Perhaps you might find Facebook a better platform for your grammatically incorrect ramblings. I trust that you're the same person who keeps posting about how you "came on" to your abuser at 8 years old while pushing the pedo apologist narrative that these two were sluts also to make yourself feel better?

by Anonymousreply 25April 15, 2019 3:15 PM

R25 You are rambling again Brenda, I just accept Jackson was a homosexual pedophile, you may come to terms with it one day, but for now you are stuck in the arrested development of a 'fan'. These jokes may lighten your mood and certainly show how Jackson was seen throughout the whole of his seedy life. the documentary is just the icing on the monumental cake of Jackson's pedophilia. Your bleoved star will always be associated with pedophilia, which is apt for a pedophile, especially one on the epic scale he maintained.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26April 15, 2019 3:20 PM

R26 Seeing a crazy person like you-- post reply after reply-- like this only further convinces me these two are lying:

[quote]You are rambling again Brenda, I just accept Jackson was a homosexual pedophile, you may come to terms with it one day, but for now you are stuck in the arrested development of a 'fan'. These jokes may lighten your mood and certainly show how Jackson was seen throughout the whole of his seedy life. the documentary is just the icing on the monumental cake of Jackson's pedophilia. Your bleoved star will always be associated with pedophilia, which is apt for a pedophile, especially one on the epic scale he maintained.

by Anonymousreply 27April 15, 2019 3:27 PM

16 million people streamed Jackson's music within only 2 days of the documentary's release. The media's early attempt to paint this as some type of nail in his coffin is laughably false. Queue crazy person at R26.

by Anonymousreply 28April 15, 2019 3:29 PM

Brett Barnes Threatens to Sue HBO For Insinuating He Was Molested in ‘Leaving Neverland’

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 29April 15, 2019 3:30 PM

Right back at ya Brenda R27 R28 and why are you posting at all when you said this in thread 14 when another Brenda asked for another thread....' No, we've already determined these two are liars, their abuse was physically impossible unless they are time travelers. Maybe a GoFundMe can help them regain some credibility. There will be no official thread 15'

by Anonymousreply 30April 15, 2019 3:30 PM

R17 Exactly. Why would you believe a docudrama after all the fake news, lies and court cases that cleared Jackson? Didn't we learn with Jussie Smollett that people lie for money and fame?

by Anonymousreply 31April 15, 2019 3:31 PM

Threatens being the operative word Brenda R29, none of these lawsuits from the family or other creeps ever materialize, just empty threats from those living off the Jackson carcass and frighted the money will dry up.

by Anonymousreply 32April 15, 2019 3:32 PM

R30 I can't even understand your replies anymore...please learn to proofread!! And who is Brenda?

by Anonymousreply 33April 15, 2019 3:32 PM

R32 Not true. MJ sued tabloids, newspapers, media companies, and former employees and almost always won millions.

[quote]none of these lawsuits from the family or other creeps ever materialize, just empty threats from those living off the Jackson carcass and frighted the money will dry up.

by Anonymousreply 34April 15, 2019 3:33 PM

This is you Brenda

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35April 15, 2019 3:34 PM

From someone on Reddit. I agree

"I haven’t watched Neverland because I am under the impression its meant to be a distraction from the other shit that is being exposed in Hollywood, entertainment in general and in politics. I’m sitting back and waiting for the dust to settle. If it withstands the scrutiny of time I will watch it. Until then I see it as worthy of deep skepticism."

by Anonymousreply 36April 15, 2019 3:34 PM

I find it interesting the movie had to be edited for the UK release to remove the facts that discredit the docudrama.

by Anonymousreply 37April 15, 2019 3:35 PM

You probably wrote in Brenda R36

by Anonymousreply 38April 15, 2019 3:35 PM

It's very easy to make accusations when the person you're accusing is unable to defend themselves.

It becomes slightly more difficult to defend those accusations after you already testified that they are false.

by Anonymousreply 39April 15, 2019 3:35 PM

Hollywood wants us to associate pedophillia with specific actors rather than its pervasive and long-standing culture.

by Anonymousreply 40April 15, 2019 3:36 PM

I disagree that you should be moved by unfalsifiable stories and emotional appeals, especially from people who only changed their stories after the statute of limitations for perjury had expired.

by Anonymousreply 41April 15, 2019 3:36 PM

There is a reason they waited till ten years after his death to run a hit piece. MJ had gone to war with the record labels during his lifetime and they never forgave him for it. Finding Neverland was their revenge.

by Anonymousreply 42April 15, 2019 3:37 PM

There has never been a more blatant peodphile Brenda.

by Anonymousreply 43April 15, 2019 3:38 PM

People have been trying to destroy MJ’s legacy for his entire career and he’s always been able to break out by sheer force of talent and character.

by Anonymousreply 44April 15, 2019 3:38 PM

His talent and character Brenda are now thankfully removed from the world, the most decent thing he ever did was get hooked on Propofol and overdose.

by Anonymousreply 45April 15, 2019 3:40 PM

Too many holes in story, perhaps Jackson had poor judgement, but I believe more than not that he is innocent.

by Anonymousreply 46April 15, 2019 3:41 PM

Leaving Neverland was a bad doc that only had testimony and no hard evidence. It did not lay out a case against Michael Jackson.

If you believed he did it before, you watch it and believe the vivid stories of James Safechuck and to a slightly lesser extent, Wade Robson.

If you didn't believe that MJ did it, you can point to the lack of hard evidence or the build of a case in the doc.

by Anonymousreply 47April 15, 2019 3:41 PM

I think if Michael was truly guilty and these men were abused, then there would be no need to use manipulative tactics like doctored audio and misplaced cut footage and so many other manipulations.

They used so much drone footage, and the same damn photos, because it allowed us not to see the two accusers too long. It’s much easier to sound combining than look convincing.

A real story of less than 2 hours each doesn’t need 3 days each to be filmed. It was cut and too many takes.

Also, they claim in there law suit that it was the most prolific child sex ring in history yet they did not implicate anyone in particular in the film. Living or dead besides michael Jackson. No specifics about who knew and who helped this occur for Michael.

There’s plenty of other timeline discrepancies I won’t get into but if you have a true story to tell, you do not need such random graphic details thrown in to be more credible.

The most emotion showed was discussing losing Wade’s father. The sister cried more for that than any abuse or pain for wade. Compare the two instances. Pay attention to what they are actually saying when they get most emotional.

They also failed to preemptively confront any counter points. When filming and honest documentary, you bring up the counter arguments and shut it down. They tried to gloss over everything and are still ignoring answering. Everything from cirque show, to law suit details, to book deals, to jimmys family losing heir business and being sued for 800k, to wade dating Brandi Jackson for 8 years.

Lies are easy. The truth is more complicated. There is not one thing that his defense tries to hide or omit. They confront it all. That’s not the same for the accusers.

by Anonymousreply 48April 15, 2019 3:43 PM

Wade and James were both exposed several times, contradicting themselves and downright just being idiots and lying to themselves and others. Leaving Neverland is not a Documentary, it’s a work of fiction, to make people believe in these ugly stories full of lies. Many plot holes, and many inconsistencies in the stories of both Robson and Safechuck, with many unprofessional scenes such as Safechuck not trying to laugh, and Dan Reed cutting into Robson with “and a lover”. Downright disgusting film, absolutely awful with lies and pathetic excuses.

by Anonymousreply 49April 15, 2019 3:45 PM

Keep saying it Brenda R47 , R48. R49 I'm the only one listening and I think you are a joke, I'll bail out on this when I'm sufficiently amused, but you are condemned to a lifetime of this nonsense, part of me pities you, but you have a very unpleasant streak that has shown itself often, so, that being the case you deserve your sadness.

by Anonymousreply 50April 15, 2019 3:46 PM

R50 Right, tell us more about how you came onto your "abuser at 8" and so you completely understand how Wade and James could have been in love with MIchael Jackson.

by Anonymousreply 51April 15, 2019 3:48 PM

[quote]no one here cares anymore.

Then why are you here 24/7?

by Anonymousreply 52April 15, 2019 3:48 PM

I like to annoy you Brenda xxx

by Anonymousreply 53April 15, 2019 3:48 PM

R52 Do a search on these threads for "Brenda" and ask yourself the same question. Tell us more about your happy relationship with the abuser you started at 8 years old though? Got a good laugh from that story.

by Anonymousreply 54April 15, 2019 3:49 PM

I would eat the corn out of Michael's doodoo.

by Anonymousreply 55April 15, 2019 3:50 PM

R54 You are wrong again Brenda, no abuse in my life, but archetypal of you to use whatever you think might hurt others to protect your special pedophile...it ain't working Brenda old girl, try the train station again we've only heard it 40 thousand times, maybe one more might convert someone, tho' I can tell you it won't, your days here have been pointless, you are so funny!

by Anonymousreply 56April 15, 2019 3:51 PM

OP, it's not still a thing: it came, people watched and reacted by adjusting their opinions to conclude that MJ really did molest boys, and it went away. No one's paying attention to the aftermath. Mainstream public opinion is that MJ molested boys. It's done.

by Anonymousreply 57April 15, 2019 3:54 PM

r54, that wasn't me, you stupid fucking pedo lover.

by Anonymousreply 58April 15, 2019 3:57 PM

R57 Right, it took people 2 months to figure out Jussie was full of shit. It took 48 hours to figure out Covington Catholic was a hoax. It's taken 2 weeks to discover both Wade and James claimed daily abuse--one in places that didn't exist, and the other when he was on a trip with his family after all (after claiming he was diddled when left behind.)

The media still tried to push those narratives well after more information came out disproving the initial claims. It's just shocking how shady they are.

by Anonymousreply 59April 15, 2019 3:58 PM

R58 Are you feeling pressed Brenda? And using bad language! Michael would be aghast! The 7 year old dick would drop from his mouth if he heard you speaking like that!

by Anonymousreply 60April 15, 2019 3:59 PM

R58 R60 Please take your meds and pull yourself together.

by Anonymousreply 61April 15, 2019 3:59 PM

R60 No, that was you replying to yourself. You're the Brenda troll, remember?

by Anonymousreply 62April 15, 2019 4:00 PM

R17 there's no such word as 'yuge.' When you're over 7, you spell it as 'huge.'

by Anonymousreply 63April 15, 2019 4:00 PM

It's a film made for shock and hook the audience. There's a lot of film making techniques to convince/ manipulate the viewer that Wade and James are victims with a sympathetic story.

IMO Wade Robson's interview with Matt Lauer in 1993 is an example of how he is naturally. All the differences in how he speaks, body language from the 1993 interview to what you seen LN is probably a result of coaching/ instruction to act a certain way for the narrative of the film.

by Anonymousreply 64April 15, 2019 4:00 PM

r60, you have the wrong poster, too. I actually make fun of Brenda.

by Anonymousreply 65April 15, 2019 4:00 PM

I stink.

by Anonymousreply 66April 15, 2019 4:02 PM

It's a one-sided, biased 'documentary' full of salacious stories that are unverifiable. They presented no real, concrete evidence of abuse. Which would be acceptable if they had spent more time solidifying a timeline instead of selling their memorabilia (anonymously--before being outed by the company) for tens of thousands of dollars before rushing off to file lawsuits.

by Anonymousreply 67April 15, 2019 4:04 PM

It does have some comedic bits, such as Jimmy supposedly sucking MJ's nipples and them having sex in the swimming pool. Besides that, it's really boring, to be honest.

by Anonymousreply 68April 15, 2019 4:06 PM

R65 Sorry about that. There are a couple of Brenda, one must be Alice, they are a very vocal minority and it's fun to take the piss out of them but they post so incessantly it's difficult to keep up, especially as they post the same childish crap ( train station, time machine etc ). I just pop in every few days to poke them in their cage, it's amusing to see them twist and turn.

by Anonymousreply 69April 15, 2019 4:07 PM

It’s a component piece to Wade and Jimmy’s lawsuit. It’s a 4 hour documentary and the bulk of is spent detailing all the times MJ’s businesses facilitated meetings between the him and the two boys (tours, music videos, flying Wade out to America, helping his family immigrate, helping both families with housing) and explaining why their story changed recently. That happens to be the two biggest things they need to prove in the lawsuit. 1) That MJ’s business facilitated the alleged abuse and 2) that their “coming forward” now is genuine considering they both said the opposite for years.

by Anonymousreply 70April 15, 2019 4:07 PM

If the documentary is such bullshit, then why are you Jackson stans making it your life's mission to dispute it? You actually bring more attention to the film by spending all your time losing your shit over it.

by Anonymousreply 71April 15, 2019 4:08 PM

It's cool, r69.

by Anonymousreply 72April 15, 2019 4:10 PM

My personal theory is that Leaving Neverland is the media's attempt on setting an extremely dangerous precedent in which we can accuse who we want, about what we want, and then sit back and watch the subject burn. This is all folly for Joe Biden, or whomever else "steps out of line" in the eyes of the (((global elite.)))

by Anonymousreply 73April 15, 2019 4:10 PM

R69 R72 Do you two need a room?

by Anonymousreply 74April 15, 2019 4:11 PM

lmao delete two guys and like two thirds of the thread disappears.

by Anonymousreply 75April 15, 2019 4:11 PM

R70 do you have any interests in your life other than MJ? You are the most prolific poster here, you must dream about it when you're not hunched over the computer doing your Sarah Sanders act. R71 is right, if the doc is so terrible in every way, why the need to bash it into the ground when most people watched it and moved on with their lives, as they do with any new information.

by Anonymousreply 76April 15, 2019 4:11 PM

R74 Jealous Brenda?

by Anonymousreply 77April 15, 2019 4:12 PM

I'm pretty sure there are documentaries about the Paula Jones case accusing Bill Clinton of murder. Just because it's a documentary doesn't mean it's factual. In fact, Dan Reed has even told us it is not as he shifted 60% of the story's continuity in one tweet changing the abuse date by 2+ years.

by Anonymousreply 78April 15, 2019 4:13 PM

We all knew MJ was a pedo before LN you 'fans' are just pissed off to have it be given a spotlight again. You are the ones keeping the doc alive.

by Anonymousreply 79April 15, 2019 4:15 PM

..another posh sounding documentarian with the endorsement of various celebrities investigates a now long dead Michael Jackson. Must be something really serious going on in real life...

by Anonymousreply 80April 15, 2019 4:17 PM

R73 Notice Brenda's use of 'global elite' , don't let her naming Joe Biden muddy the waters , she's also used cuck to insult the victims....we see you alt right Brenda.

by Anonymousreply 81April 15, 2019 4:18 PM

Someone really wants to ruin MJs legacy, im glad people are not buying that bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 82April 15, 2019 4:18 PM

R82 He ruined himself Bren, facially, bodily, healthwise, career wise, he was the architect of his own downfall

by Anonymousreply 83April 15, 2019 4:19 PM

Within 24 hours of MJ’s death, Wade was in talks with the show So You Think You Can Dance to do an MJ special. He also repeatedly messaged MJ’s family to get a place at the MJ funeral.

by Anonymousreply 84April 15, 2019 4:19 PM

In 2011, Wade signed on to be part of the MJ Cirque Du Soleil show. He can be found very excitedly talking about being involved with the project on YouTube. He dropped out however as he wanted to focus his efforts on a film project which would be his directorial debut and his big break. This fell through however, and Wade desperately begged to be let back on to the Cirque Du Soleil show. With a 1 year old son and now no employment, this was understandable. His email to the creative director where he begs for the job and talks about his desire to keep MJ’s legacy alive can be found online. However after proving unreliable before, his pleas for the job were refused. According to a fellow choreographer who worked with him, Darrin Henson, Wade took this rejection very badly.

by Anonymousreply 85April 15, 2019 4:20 PM

Also in 2011, Wade sold his entire MJ memorabilia collection for thousands of dollars through an intermediary (Juliens Auctions). He tried to do this anonymously but the collection was listed as the Wade Robson collection. According to Juliens Auctions, Wade needed the cash.

by Anonymousreply 86April 15, 2019 4:20 PM

Then in 2012, Wade realised that MJ molested him. He proceeded to write a book with these new allegations, but could not get a publisher to give him a book deal.

by Anonymousreply 87April 15, 2019 4:20 PM

In 2013, Wade launched a lawsuit worth millions of dollars against the MJ estate. James Safechuck (a failed actor) then sees Wade’s case on TV, realises he too was molested, hires the same lawyers, and submits a lawsuit. These suits were dismissed in 2017 but Wade and James are currently appealing their cases in court.

by Anonymousreply 88April 15, 2019 4:21 PM

The director of this new documentary has repeatedly said in interviews that both men stand nothing to gain financially, but this is simply NOT TRUE. On the contrary, both Wade and James have lawsuits worth hundreds of millions coming up on appeal against the MJ estate. Convincing the public they have a case greatly increases their chances at making a lot of money.

by Anonymousreply 89April 15, 2019 4:21 PM

R89 (and 70% of this and any LN thread ) Brenda, it's been fun watching you mentally collapse as always, but I've got a life so will leave you to rant about train stations and time machines, lawsuits etc etc, I imagine you'll have filled this thread by time I look in again. I suppose it stops you writing anymore 'books'. Be back to laugh at you another time, try to cling to what's left of your sanity. Go easy on the Jesus Juice!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 90April 15, 2019 4:27 PM

R90 finally the unhinged crazy person at R26 is gone. Let's not jinx it.

by Anonymousreply 91April 15, 2019 4:30 PM

They waited too long to come forward. Of course no one’s gonna believe them. MJ has been dead for ten years now. I believe those who originally came forward, but not these guys. It looks as if they are trying to cash in...

by Anonymousreply 92April 15, 2019 4:33 PM

r81, Brenda/Jackaloon that posts here was praising Breitbart, so yeah, she's/they definitely lean to the fascist/racist side. And, they have the nerve to bring that shit to a gay forum.

by Anonymousreply 93April 15, 2019 4:36 PM

Too soon Brenda R91 you sure know from unhinged and crazy , keep posting your loopy 'fan' shit so I can have a good laugh when I check in next...Do the Train Station bit again, that's hilarious, especially when you do it all in CAPS! Comedy gold!

by Anonymousreply 94April 15, 2019 4:36 PM

R93 / R94 Your psychotic posting history makes any attempt to brand someone else as crazy as impossible as Safechuck having his nipples sucked every day in that train station.

by Anonymousreply 95April 15, 2019 7:15 PM

"Hold my beer JABBA!"

by Anonymousreply 96April 15, 2019 7:16 PM

I started a Thread 15 with some anti pedo rhetoric at the top, so the TST threw a fit and decided he would post here instead.

by Anonymousreply 97April 16, 2019 1:57 AM

Notice how the pedo troll likes to describe acts of pedophilia as frequently as possible. Keeps repeating 'Micheal licked his anus/sucked his nipples' over and over again with relish.

I think we are dealing with an actual pedophile.

by Anonymousreply 98April 16, 2019 1:59 AM

'Also in 2011, Wade sold his entire MJ memorabilia collection for thousands of dollars through an intermediary (Juliens Auctions). '

Yep, glad you agree that this is more proof that MJ abused him. If he had been his friend, Wade would have wanted to keep some of the merch for sentimental reasons.

by Anonymousreply 99April 16, 2019 2:01 AM

OP= Diana Ross

by Anonymousreply 100April 16, 2019 2:09 AM

R99 At this point, he didn't "realize" he had even been abused yet. Wasn't until after he told the auction house he needed the money that this epiphany hit him.

[quote]If he had been his friend, Wade would have wanted to keep some of the merch for sentimental reasons.

by Anonymousreply 101April 16, 2019 3:46 AM

James: We would get a blanket and lay down on the floor inside the closet next to his main bed. So we could close the doors and have like several sort of doors people have to get through. There is just a hall that leads to his room. So there were bells so you can have a moment hearing them trip release it alarmed him when people are coming.

5 minutes later..

James: In the movie theater had these two like private rooms, had big glass windows so you can see the theatre and so we would have sex in those rooms. That was a bit dangerous, but there was a bit excitement there. The pool and the jacuzzi, oral sex. Like holding your breath and going down. Kinda like a game.

Wade: I don't think he liked to mix us.

He liked to keep these relationships separate.

5 minutes later..

Wade: There was kind of mass sleepover at Neverland....and it was Jordy, Macaulay Culkin and myself.

by Anonymousreply 102April 16, 2019 3:48 AM

It does seem amusing that all of these elaborate security steps would be taken within his bedroom to cover the abuse, yet they also did this constantly everywhere else on the property including the outdoor teepee canopies, pool, theater, train station (when Safechuck was 16+ despite stating all abuse ended at 14), theme park castle and so on. Made even more risky by apparent video cameras that had been installed around the property, according to James.

by Anonymousreply 103April 16, 2019 3:50 AM

R103 ( and almost every other pro Jackson post on this site) Oh Brenda, Breitbart Brenda, you disappoint me, and worse still you disappoint dead Michael! I've been gone a whole day and you've barely posted anything, tho' you did still managed to mention the train station ,which is something. You are slipping, Michael won't come to you in your dreams if you don't fight for him! You don't want dead Michael to think you are a cuck do you?

by Anonymousreply 104April 16, 2019 12:07 PM

You do realize the real troll that used to cause all the MJ threads to get deleted is the psycho who created tons of anti MJ threads and filled up an entire thread with excerpts from the pedo fan fiction novel MIchael Jackson Was My Lover, which Guiterrez wrote AFTER being successfully sued by Jackson for claiming to have seen a sex tape that didn't exist. Calling MJ fans is a bit disingenous. There are plenty of people on DL who are obsessed with either slandering Jackson or pushing a pro pedophila agenda.

by Anonymousreply 105April 16, 2019 6:02 PM

Calling MJ fans obsessed is a bit disingenous

by Anonymousreply 106April 16, 2019 6:02 PM

R106 Jackson fans, and anyone else willing to scrutinize these mens's claims, are on the side of truth. Those trying to manufacture victims not only are baselessly defaming a dead man and causing harm to his family, but are doing a disservice to actual CSA and sexual abuse victims.

by Anonymousreply 107April 16, 2019 6:47 PM

[quote]I think we are dealing with an actual pedophile.

Yes, I imagine many of the Jackson supporters are pedophiles themselves, with the rest being fat lonely fraus. They're all batshit crazy, though.

by Anonymousreply 108April 16, 2019 7:42 PM

I had to do som travel outside the Stdtes last month and got a kick out of hearing MJ’s music in every city almost every day. I don’t know if it was defiance or obliviousness regarding the documentary, but the rest of he world didn’t give a damn. I will always love his music and can enjoy it even more now that I know Ko children are being harmed in the process.

Everyone knew what Jackson was since the 90/2000 court cases. Everyone accepted it and moved on. This was nothing new and he’s dead. Might as well make those terrible allegations worth something by enjoying the artist.

by Anonymousreply 109April 16, 2019 8:00 PM

Put the pipe down, r109.

by Anonymousreply 110April 16, 2019 8:06 PM

In my day, people didn’t speak badly of the deceased.

by Anonymousreply 111April 16, 2019 8:33 PM

R37, that's nonsense. The UK version was edited purely for time. Someone on reddit has compiled a list of all the cut scenes: they mostly consist of repetition and descriptions that aren't important to the overall story.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 112April 16, 2019 10:50 PM

[quote]In my day, people didn’t speak badly of the deceased.

In my day, people didn't idolize pedophiles.

by Anonymousreply 113April 17, 2019 12:31 AM

Michael Pedo Jackson. One of the most evil men to walk the face of the earth.

by Anonymousreply 114April 17, 2019 1:09 AM

I watched the UK version and it was four hours long, exactly the same as the US one. It was run over two nights. Nothing was left out so don't let the Train Station Troll fool you.

by Anonymousreply 115April 17, 2019 1:09 AM

R115 The part about Wade visiting MJ's family was removed from subsequent broadcasts. At this point, it doesn't matter what's left because the entire doc is being torn apart bit by bit. You could have a trivia track and it would literally pop up every few seconds detailing creative use of timelines, discredited testimony from Wade, James, and Joy, documentary evidence that explains Jackson's wherabouts during the alleged abuse, conflicting testimonies from other witnesses, video and audio excerpts that were taken out of context or outright manipulated, false claims of emotional neglect projected onto Jackson by both parents, projecting guilt onto Jackson for Wade's father's bipolar disorder, omitting relevant facts that would disrupt the narrative of Jackson dumping these boys, claims that are suspect due to circumstantial evidence such as being threatened to testify, and so much more. It will be like an episode of VH1's Pop Up Video.

by Anonymousreply 116April 17, 2019 4:47 AM

R116 A trivia track...lol. I can imagine one those "fun facts" type of popups. Especially when they hit Safechuck's footage of the train station his daily abuse began in.

Safechuck: It would happen everyday

Fun Fact: Construction did not even begin until 5 years later

by Anonymousreply 117April 17, 2019 5:12 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 118April 17, 2019 5:55 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 119April 17, 2019 5:56 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 120April 17, 2019 5:57 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 121April 17, 2019 5:58 AM

Oh look. Videos with more awards and a higher rank R118 R119 R120 R121

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 122April 17, 2019 1:49 PM

Can you count up all the Grammys? R118 R119 R120 R121

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 123April 17, 2019 1:50 PM

At this stage the only people pushing this discredited lie are racist pedos projecting their vices onto a dead man.

by Anonymousreply 124April 17, 2019 1:51 PM

He was seen as a racist pedo when he was alive R124 .We are all delighted he is rotting in his junkie, pedophile grave and he can't manipulate and slime his way into young boy's pants any more. Hoooray!!

by Anonymousreply 125April 17, 2019 3:20 PM

"Wade would have wanted to keep some of the merch for sentimental reasons."

Wade is a broke-ass grifter who had a couple choreography gigs but hasn't worked in years. Imagine being thisclose to so much wealth but not having any access to it- or any way to earn it yourself?

He needs to move to Alabama and get a job in a call center or something.

by Anonymousreply 126April 17, 2019 3:41 PM

Jackson is a dead pedophile, he can't move anywhere because he's rotting in pedophile hell R126

by Anonymousreply 127April 17, 2019 4:13 PM

Do you like my paintings? I use colored boogers and snot as my medium.

by Anonymousreply 128April 17, 2019 4:29 PM

Michael loved to sing about his pedophilia!

Pretty Young Thing

Bad

Dangerous

Smooth Criminal

by Anonymousreply 129April 18, 2019 1:36 AM

New Poll

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 130April 18, 2019 1:45 AM

Wade and James were both exposed several times, contradicting themselves and downright just being idiots and lying to themselves and others. Leaving Neverland is not a Documentary, it’s a work of fiction, to make people believe in these ugly stories full of lies. Many plot holes, and many inconsistencies in the stories of both Robson and Safechuck, with many unprofessional scenes such as Safechuck not trying to laugh, and Dan Reed cutting into Robson with “and a lover”. Downright disgusting film, absolutely awful with lies and pathetic excuses.

by Anonymousreply 131April 20, 2019 3:56 AM

Jacko is an ugly pedophile.

by Anonymousreply 132April 20, 2019 9:31 AM

R132 is late for a cross-burning.

by Anonymousreply 133April 20, 2019 5:55 PM

r133 is late for a NAMBLA meeting.

by Anonymousreply 134April 20, 2019 8:52 PM

PAEDOGEDDON

by Anonymousreply 135April 25, 2019 1:05 AM

Who is Brenda?????????

by Anonymousreply 136May 21, 2019 7:14 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!