Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Prince William’s Lawyer Tries to Suppress Rumors of Affair

Don't let this scandal die. We need a good royal ruckus.

by Anonymousreply 438Last Monday at 2:46 AM

Meghan Markle LEAKED Affair Between Prince William & Rose Hanbury?

by Anonymousreply 104/13/2019

Royal lawyers issue warning over rumors of Prince William affair with Marchioness of Cholmondeley

by Anonymousreply 204/13/2019

It's good to be da King, or at least second in line.

by Anonymousreply 304/13/2019

It would be really interesting if William is really having an affair with the Marchioness of Cholmondeley--it would be like his father neglecting his much prettier wife to have an affair with a plainer woman. Rose Cholmondeley is a former model, but anyone can see Kate is much prettier.

by Anonymousreply 404/13/2019

Well she's screwing SOMEONE.

by Anonymousreply 504/13/2019

This is par for the course among the royals. Kate is a sensible and pragmatic woman, not a borderline personality disordered hysteric like Diana .I'm sure she'll manage just fine.

by Anonymousreply 604/13/2019

Here is a photo of William and Kate with the Cholmondeleys.

David, the Marquess of Choldmondeley, was handsome when he was younger, but now he looks very dowdy and geeky as he has become older (he's close to sixty). He also looks very skinny.

by Anonymousreply 704/13/2019

David Cholmondeley in 1992, when he was young and handsome.

by Anonymousreply 804/13/2019

R8 has a loose definition of handsome.

by Anonymousreply 904/13/2019

...Well, when he was younger.

by Anonymousreply 1004/13/2019

I had taken it for granted that princes have affairs. Prince Charles had a longtime well-publicized affair, Prince Philip had extramarital dalliances, I'd be surprised if King George VI, Queen Elizabeth's father, and King Edward VIII her uncle didn't. It's as natural as sneezing.

by Anonymousreply 1104/13/2019

Well he must have some libido.

by Anonymousreply 1204/13/2019

We know https://www.datalounge.com/thread/22497953

by Anonymousreply 1304/13/2019

I'm no royalist but I highly doubt William would do this. He knows how his dad got panned for screwing around on his mother, it just doesn't seem worth it. I could be wrong though.

by Anonymousreply 1404/13/2019

You are.

by Anonymousreply 1504/13/2019

I don't think he ever passionately loved Kate. But William is such a loser bore.

by Anonymousreply 1604/13/2019

Why is Kate wearing a head of lettuce pinned to her dress in OP’s pic?

by Anonymousreply 1704/13/2019

it looks more like alfalfa

by Anonymousreply 1804/13/2019

R17 It was St Patrick’s day. She hands out shamrocks to the mascot of the Irish Guards and wears them herself pinned to her dress. It’s a tradition.

by Anonymousreply 1904/13/2019

The Marquess and Marchioness of Cholmondeley have a nicer house than Will and Kate.

by Anonymousreply 2004/13/2019

I doubt that George VI ever had an affair, he was a nervous stammering insecure person who adored his wife.

by Anonymousreply 2104/13/2019

'house'

by Anonymousreply 2204/13/2019

I always think of puppets when I hear Marchioness.

by Anonymousreply 2304/13/2019

Explore Houghton Hall’s extraordinary art collection

A new portrait of Rose Cholmondeley is joining the family’s collection of masterpieces

by Anonymousreply 2404/13/2019

I thought William would be above this kind of stuff, considering his history...

by Anonymousreply 2504/13/2019

Neither George VI nor his father George V, the current queen's father and grandfather, had affairs. They were too uptight.

I agree it would be really unlikely for either William or Harry to cheat on their wives, since they know how miserable their father's cheating made their mother, whom they are both obsessed with.

by Anonymousreply 2604/13/2019

[quote] I agree it would be really unlikely for either William or Harry to cheat on their wives, since they know how miserable their father's cheating made their mother, whom they are both obsessed with.

Respectfully, that's just not how it works. Children grow up seeing their parents do all kinds of things (abuse drugs, hit their spouses, abuse their children, etc.). Yet, children repeat the same pattern (as their parents) rather than break the cycle.

by Anonymousreply 2704/13/2019

Well big whoopdedoo and quelle surprise. Those royals is all whores.

by Anonymousreply 2804/13/2019

R17 because her carrot, kale, and turnip pins were at the cleaner's.

by Anonymousreply 2904/13/2019

Men and women aren't monogamous.

Yes, Frauen, your man, too.

by Anonymousreply 3004/13/2019

Yup, Della...doesn’t matter what made them miserable when they were young. If anything, that draws them back to the trough.

by Anonymousreply 3104/13/2019

It's true that many people aren't monogamous.

But many people are.

by Anonymousreply 3204/13/2019

I say thee nay!

by Anonymousreply 3304/13/2019

Well Kate went and got all loosey "down there" from poppin' out all those wee bairns. What did the common frump expect?

by Anonymousreply 3404/13/2019

[quote]I agree it would be really unlikely for either William or Harry to cheat on their wives, since they know how miserable their father's cheating made their mother, whom they are both obsessed with.

It's true that William & Harry grew up with domestic discord between their parents, but that doesn't mean that biology and natural sexual urges won't take over sometimes.

They both have access to a lot of pussy, and it may be tough for them to resist it.

by Anonymousreply 3504/13/2019

Ordinarily I would be a pearlclutcher, but his wife has been pregnant for 7 years, so...

by Anonymousreply 3604/13/2019

I thought, while a bachelor, George VI had an affair with a married woman before he became king. His father asked him to break it off and he acquiesced.

by Anonymousreply 3704/13/2019

[quote]I thought William would be above this kind of stuff, considering his history...

No one is exempt from sex.

by Anonymousreply 3804/13/2019

William didn't get as much pussy as me before he got married, so he's trying to make up for it now.

by Anonymousreply 3904/13/2019

Well, if it's all over the net, the lawyer hasn't done a very good job of suppressing it.

by Anonymousreply 4004/13/2019

This affair and trying to squelch it is the reason that Harry and Markle are gossiped about and disliked. The bad press the Sussexes are getting are meant to distract from William's affair. And that's why the boys have split. Harry is pissed with William now that the Sussexes have to take the heat in the press--just so people don't pay attention to William's sex on the side.

by Anonymousreply 4104/13/2019

Kate is anorexic. Way too thin and wan. Something is wrong in that household. If not cheating, then she’s trying to make Meghan jealous by being stick thin. I’ll take the healthy looking Meg any day.

by Anonymousreply 4204/13/2019

I wonder if Kaiser and the readers of Celebitchy are masturbating furiously to this news. They all fantasize that she is Evil Incarnate.

by Anonymousreply 4304/13/2019

William is jealous that he never got to do stuff like this:

by Anonymousreply 4404/13/2019

That Rose lady seems way too interesting and fabulous to have an affiar with boring dorky William

by Anonymousreply 4504/13/2019

Rose looks like a slightly glammed up Heather Matarrazo

by Anonymousreply 4604/13/2019

What kind of model was she--a [italic]hand[/italic] model?

by Anonymousreply 4704/13/2019

Rose was born with a proper title; something Kate was not: the Marchioness of Cholmondeley.

by Anonymousreply 4804/13/2019

All those dames look like hungry rabbits.

by Anonymousreply 4904/13/2019

No, R48, she wasn’t born with a title. Don’t make stuff up, it just makes you look stupid.

“Stupider”, I mean.

She was born Miss Rose Hanbury. She married a man with a title ( Marquess of Cholmondeley) and as such derives her title from her husband.

You yanks need to either get it right or shut the fuck up when offering your opinion on the British aristocracy or royalty.

by Anonymousreply 5004/13/2019

^^ Yawn . . .

by Anonymousreply 5104/13/2019

I wonder if R50 has even the slightest idea of how little we care about the royal leeches. And we saved your fucking bacon in WW2.

by Anonymousreply 5204/13/2019

For the second time in 25 years, R52...

by Anonymousreply 5304/13/2019

[quote]All those dames look like hungry rabbits. —Miss Caswell

Better than looking like a rodent.

by Anonymousreply 5404/13/2019

William has always been kind of boring.

He was cute when he was younger and had a full head of hair, but Harry has always seemed like he would be more fun in bed.

by Anonymousreply 5504/13/2019

Judging from r48’s picture, I’d say a hand model.

by Anonymousreply 5604/13/2019

Shouldn't the husband be a 'Marquis' instead of an -ess anything? Is her husband trans?

by Anonymousreply 5704/13/2019

Any yet you read through 51 posts, R52, on a subject about which you profess to care so little...

And you assume that it was my bacon that “you” saved, or your forebears participated in saving, along with a whole bunch of other countries. Which it wasn’t.

But well done in responding like a stereotypical American!

by Anonymousreply 5804/13/2019

R8 He looks, well you know, Jewish.

by Anonymousreply 5904/13/2019

He is Jewish.

Probably put his lovely cut cock into many men.

by Anonymousreply 6004/13/2019

He’s of Jewish descent, R59. He speaks of it in interviews - his grandmother was the heiress Sybil Sassoon, who brought a lot of much needed funds into the family when she married his grandfather. She was from the French branch of the Rothschild family.

by Anonymousreply 6104/13/2019

No, R57. The Marquess of Cholmondeley is not “trans”.

FYI different countries have different ways of spelling words. That’s because different countries have different “languages”. In England, the people speak “English”. In France, the people speak “French”.

In English, the male title holder is the “Marquess”. His wife is the “Marchioness”.

In French, the male title holder is the “Marquis”. His wife is the “Marquise”.

Hope that helps!

by Anonymousreply 6204/13/2019

#44's pic is why Elizabeth summoned Harry to her throne and said: "Get a wife, get her pregnant and get it together!"

by Anonymousreply 6304/14/2019

R63, that may be true but it didn’t quite work immediately. He got engaged five years later after Vegas.

by Anonymousreply 6404/14/2019

[QUOTE]And you assume that it was my bacon that “you” saved, or your forebears participated in saving, along with a whole bunch of other countries.

Give me a break. America saved the world from Hitler, not a “whole bunch of other countries.” Don’t even think about diminishing our role in the war.

by Anonymousreply 6504/14/2019
by Anonymousreply 6604/14/2019

You mean like the way we broke Enigma, R65?

by Anonymousreply 6704/14/2019

Is there going to be another British Royal Family Gossip thread?

by Anonymousreply 6804/14/2019

R7/R8 is correct. A quarter century ago the Marquess of Cholmondeley had sensual potential and quasi-regal potency. Now he has become a grinning, complaisant cuckold of a scarecrow rattling around that house while the balding, horse-faced heir to the throne finishes off in his wife.

by Anonymousreply 6904/14/2019

Who’s “we,” R67?

by Anonymousreply 7004/14/2019

I didn't raise him to bring such shame to his wife.

by Anonymousreply 7104/14/2019

Now I really want to get a license plate with "MARCHIONESS" printed on it

by Anonymousreply 7204/14/2019

So the press is reporting on his lawyers suppressing the affair in the news by reporting how his lawyers are suppressing the affair in the news. Mkay.

by Anonymousreply 7304/14/2019

Actually, WW2 ended more so on both fronts because of Russia's efforts, not ours. Particularly in Japan. Many mistakenly have the belief that Japan surrendered due to Nagasaki and Hiroshima. No. The Russians were coming and the Japanese were well aware of how savage their forces were in Europe. That is what finally convinced them to surrender.

by Anonymousreply 7404/14/2019

David Cholmondeley hung around Andy Warhol and the Factory in the early 1980s and was well-known to be bi.

by Anonymousreply 7504/14/2019

R74 = the biggest bunch of bullshit I ever read.

by Anonymousreply 7604/14/2019

R74 Total horseshit.

by Anonymousreply 7704/14/2019

Shouldn't you be at Breitbart, r77?

by Anonymousreply 7804/14/2019

Only a moron would deny the importance of the Soviet Union in defeating Hitler. They lost 24 million people in the war, about 50 times the US losses. Of course they started out by allying with the Nazis to divide up Poland and free Germany to focus on the west, but Hitler got greedy.

by Anonymousreply 7904/14/2019

R67, Enigma was broken in 1941, two years after the war started and four years before it ended. It would have been a very LONG four years for years for England if the U.S. hadn't come to its aid.

by Anonymousreply 8004/14/2019

The question remains, "Will the Duke of Cambridge heed the request by the Duchess of Cambridge to 'phase out' his main squeeze on the side, the Marchioness of Cholmondeley?

Title only. No names, please.

Their children are playmates. I'm sure it is all just an unfortunate misunderstanding by the duchess. By the way, "Marchioness of Cholmondeley" sounds much more regal and aristocratic than "Duchess of Cambridge."

by Anonymousreply 8104/14/2019

[quote] Shouldn't the husband be a 'Marquis' instead of an -ess anything?

No. Some holders of marquessates in the UK take the title of "Marquis," and some take the title of "Marquess." They are pronounced identically, only spelled differently, depending on the custom when the marquessate was created.

by Anonymousreply 8204/14/2019

America came into the first world war two and half years after it started. It came into the second world war at the end of 1941... again about two years since the start of hostilities.

So let's recall the Winston Churchill quote: You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else

by Anonymousreply 8304/14/2019

[quote]By the way, "Marchioness of Cholmondeley" sounds much more regal and aristocratic than "Duchess of Cambridge."

No, it doesn't at all. The title of an ordinary duchess outranks a marchioness, and a royal duchess's title outranks that of an ordinary duchess.

Some of you are just pulling things out of your asses.

by Anonymousreply 8404/14/2019

[quote] Now I really want to get a license plate with "MARCHIONESS" printed on it

That would be too many letters.

by Anonymousreply 8504/14/2019

Well, it had to happen sooner or later...

by Anonymousreply 8604/14/2019

Further to R80: Enigma was broken thanks in large part to the contributions of Alan Turing, an English mathematician, computer scientist, logician, cryptanalyst, philosopher and theoretical biologist.

During the Second World War, Turing worked for the Government Code and Cypher School (GC&CS) at Bletchley Park, Britain's codebreaking centre that produced Ultra intelligence. For a time he led Hut 8, the section that was responsible for German naval cryptanalysis. Here, he devised a number of techniques for speeding the breaking of German ciphers, including improvements to the pre-war Polish bombe method, an electromechanical machine that could find settings for the Enigma machine.

Turing played a pivotal role in cracking intercepted coded messages that enabled the Allies to defeat the Nazis in many crucial engagements, including the Battle of the Atlantic, and in so doing helped win the war. Counterfactual history is difficult with respect to the effect Ultra intelligence had on the length of the war, but at the upper end it has been estimated that this work shortened the war in Europe by more than two years and saved over 14 million lives.

And how did the British government thank him for his efforts to shorten the war and save millions of lives?

Turing was prosecuted in 1952 for homosexual acts as the Labouchere Amendment had mandated that "gross indecency" was a criminal offence in the UK. He accepted chemical castration treatment, with DES, as an alternative to prison. Turing died in 1954, 16 days before his 42nd birthday, from cyanide poisoning. An inquest determined his death as a suicide, but it has been noted that the known evidence is also consistent with accidental poisoning.

Forty-five years after his death, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown made an official public apology on behalf of the British government for "the appalling way he was treated."

Not that it did Turing much good.

by Anonymousreply 8704/14/2019

^^ Great story, I had never heard that

by Anonymousreply 8804/14/2019

If he is straying in Kate's shoes I'd just get me a bit of hot bodyguard action to even up the score. It's not like he's going to divorce her.

by Anonymousreply 8904/14/2019

R87, why am I supposed to care about your post? You do know that a movie was made about Turing, right? He's not some obscure figure.

by Anonymousreply 9004/14/2019

Maybe the marchioness like the uncut cock.

by Anonymousreply 9104/14/2019

The marchioness loves Will's intact cock. The problem is Kate wants it too without it resulting in another kid.

by Anonymousreply 9204/14/2019

Jesus. Listen the Soviet Union declared war on Japan after Germany was defeated. They only fought on one front, and one enemy. Not like the US at all. Germany needed Soviet oil and so, invaded.

The Soviets defended their country, that's where the death count comes in. not from fighting for other countries. In other words, US is fighting an ofensive war, USSR a defensive one. They did not fight the war in the pacific. Then, Stalin thought, yes, let's grab territory. And entered the pacific theater way late.

Yes, the USSR, US, France, UK were allies.

For the record we put Nazis on trial at the end of WW2. Crimes against humanity and genocide. Nazis are bad people.

Back to this mess. The side piece and Kate look similar. Same build, hair. Same social standing. I think that's interesting. Have there been other cheating rumors about Will?

by Anonymousreply 9304/14/2019

R90: I do know that at least three movies, not one as you mention, have been made about Turing: Breaking the Code in 1996, Codebreaker in 2013, and The Imitation Game in 2014. Another three, 2000's U-571, 2001's Enigma, and 2001's All the Queen's Men dealt primarily with obtaining the Enigma machines, but of these three only the film Enigma deals with Bletchley Park and Turing in any detail. The third, All the Queen's Men, is unsurprisingly execrable, understandably as Matt LeBlanc and Eddie Izzard are the leads. In drag.

If you've seen The Imitation Game and relied on it as an accurate portrayal you'd be misinformed as Turing and the team at Bletchley were not the first to break the Enigma code; that had been done years before, starting in 1927, by the Polish Army's Cipher Bureau. While much credit is due Turing - far more than he received from the British government during his lifetime - at least as much or more is due the Poles whose contribution is accorded exactly one sentence in the film. It's said that when The Imitation Game was first shown in Warsaw, a hush fell over the crowd in the theatre when they realized that was all the credit the Polish contribution was going to get. See the story below from The Telegraph several years ago.

And, "No," I don't trouble myself by wondering why anyone, let alone you - whoever you are - cares about something I post. It's an anonymous board. I can't imagine why you'd ask if I do, though. I am, of course, happy to provide accurate information as noted by R88: "Great story. I had never heard that." Making me think perhaps not everyone is familiar with the story.

by Anonymousreply 9404/14/2019

r74 is correct.

r93, Hitler had 3/4 of his military on the Eastern Front: Russia.

I know us Americans don't like it when our self-invented "exceptionalism" is challenged but, to know that Russia earned, at the cost of millions of lives, to lion's share of the credit for defeating Hitler doesn't take away from what Americans and other Allied did.

by Anonymousreply 9504/14/2019

R94, I'm not relying on movies for anything. I'm just trying to figure out why you brought my initial post into it and then act like Turing is some obscure historical figure especially on a gay board. .

by Anonymousreply 9604/14/2019

[quote]The marchioness loves Will's intact cock. The problem is Kate wants it too without it resulting in another kid.

Why can't they just share? One on each side.

by Anonymousreply 9704/14/2019

[quote] FYI different countries have different ways of spelling words. That’s because different countries have different “languages”. In England, the people speak “English”. In France, the people speak “French”. In English, the male title holder is the “Marquess”. His wife is the “Marchioness”.In French, the male title holder is the “Marquis”. His wife is the “Marquise”.

The use of "marchioness" was rare in England until the Stuart times. The wife of a Marquis was known as "The Lady Marquis of...." One of the few women who received a Marquessate in her own right was known as "The Lady Marquis of Pembroke". Over time, more and more marquises opted to use the spelling of "marquess". It wasn't until Queen Victoria's time that "marquess" became the standard, although in Scotland "marquis" was still being used by some peers as late as World War I.

When members of the British Royal Family gave up German titles during the First World War, Queen Mary's youngest brother, Prince Alexander of Teck was offered the title of Marquess of Athlone (Athlone was an Irish territorial designation as Ireland was still part of the UK then) in compensation for his lost German princely title. Alexander turned his nose up at it saying that "marquess" sounded French and that he would prefer to made an earl. So, Earl of Athlone it was.

by Anonymousreply 9804/14/2019

R96 Are you also R67?

If so, re-read what you wrote, "You mean like the way [bold]we[/bold] broke Enigma" in response to R65's "Give me a break. America saved the world from Hitler, not a “whole bunch of other countries.” Don’t even think about diminishing our role in the war."

Then re-read what I wrote. Unless you're Polish, your "we" - presumably Turing and Company at Bletchley Park - were not the first to break the Enigma code. The Poles were.

by Anonymousreply 9904/14/2019

R95 sweetie, I know we Americans used to read books.

To review: the USSR fought a defensive war with one other country.

The US fought an offensive war that was global in scale,

It's terrible thousands of Soviet civilians and soldiers died defending their homeland.

It's also terrible Stalin made a pack with Germany to invade Poland in the first fucking place.

It's also terrible Stalin purged his military staff so that the Soviets had no military command on the ground when the Germans invaded, leading to the above mentioned death of thousands.

So, yes, if you want to credit the unnecessary death of thousands of people has "helpful" in stopping a German advance great.

Now, do we think Will has had other side pieces?

by Anonymousreply 10004/14/2019

No, r99, I did not post at r67. Again, not sure why I'm on the receiving end of your lecture.

by Anonymousreply 10104/14/2019

What was your initial post?

by Anonymousreply 10204/14/2019

Bye, r102.

by Anonymousreply 10304/14/2019

Enough with the Enigma. We're talking about a royal scandal here. William cheated. Kate wants Rose "phased out." Wow. Why isn't she demanding that the other woman Rose be cut off? "Phased out?" That's kind of odd and rather tolerant aimed at a women she wants banished from Williams's life.

Enigma people...get your own thread.

by Anonymousreply 10404/14/2019

Enigma PERSON, r104. I didn't want to be on the receiving end of some Aspie's lecture on Turing.

by Anonymousreply 10504/14/2019

He also wants to fuck Meghan. Lol, William is a sneaky bitch, watch that cunt when he's not talking. Sneaky as hellllllll with a wondering eye.

by Anonymousreply 10604/14/2019

William look good in leather shorts.

by Anonymousreply 10704/14/2019

Marchioness! Marchioness! Marchioness!

by Anonymousreply 10804/14/2019

R105, I can't seem to post it, but cosmo has an article that addresses the phasing out language. No one knows what happened and Kate is upset that "phasing out" was used in the sun article. Due to libel laws, the press won't speculate. Delicious. I think there's more side pieces.

by Anonymousreply 10904/14/2019

Kate wants Rose "phased out." That's terribly polite. Why doesn't she tell William to knock it the fuck off immediately or get the hell out?

Phased out sounds like she's going to finish up the last of the soup even though she doesn't care for it. And then next time she's at the grocery store she'll pick up a couple of cans of old reliable chicken noodle.

by Anonymousreply 11004/14/2019

Marquess is my new Grindr name.

Marchioness is my new drag name.

by Anonymousreply 11104/14/2019

[quote]Kate is upset that "phasing out" was used in the sun article.

I haven't heard that. Here's what [italic]Vanity Fair France[/italic] writes regarding the rumours

[quote][bold]Not the first time.[/bold] VF France says “it’s not the first time” William and Kate have faced these kinds of rumors but with the Rose Hanbury situation, the Cambridges “seem shaken and destabilized.”

[quote][bold]The Cholmondeleys were cut off[/bold] VF France theorizes that the rumors basically started because Kate completely cut off the Cholmondeleys and asked the Turnip Toffs to do the same without explanation, and that’s why there’s been so much gossip within the Toff set. The Sun apparently “received a warning from the Palace in attempt to shut down the story.” But: “This infidelity is supposedly an open secret waiting to be spread on the public place.”

If Kate did move against the Cholmondeleys, it is a stupid move. Neither Will nor the Turnip Toffs are going to follow. If anyone is cut off, it's going to be Kate. She gains nothing by having the affair public; her best bet to wait it out. OTOH, Rose leaked that she doesn't care what is out there.

by Anonymousreply 11204/14/2019

No, R99, I was attempting sarcasm - I despise thoughtless American exceptionalism.

by Anonymousreply 11304/14/2019

The "phase out" phrasing is part of the attempt at a cover up.

by Anonymousreply 11404/14/2019

R122, thanks for the clarification. Palace intrigue, love it. How will Kate play her card? She waited years for the ring.

by Anonymousreply 11504/14/2019

"[italic]Pack[/italic]," R100?

by Anonymousreply 11604/14/2019

He's a good boy is our WIlliam.

by Anonymousreply 11704/14/2019

r115 I don't know. [bold]Kate is very vulnerable, she's done her duty and is expendable.[/bold] Charles proved you can discard one wife, pick up another, and everyone eventually accepts it.

My thinking is that [bold]Kate is not filing for divorce, putting the ball in William's court.[/bold] She'll make it obvious that he is discarding her for slutty Rose. I don't know if Will, a man who always takes the path of least resistance, files for divorce.

[bold]Rose is the wildcard.[/bold] Does she continue to leak stories to the press? Does she arrange to be papped w/Will? With William's consent, [bold]she can make it super uncomfortable for Kate - both within the Turnip set and in the press. [/bold]

Another thing - even before the "phase out" articles, [bold]increasingly negative articles about the Middletons (esp Carole) began appearing. IMO, there is [bold]blood in the water re Kate & Midds, they are no longer under William's protection.[/bold] In fact, the anti-Midd articles are more problematic than the Rose affair. We don't know anything about Rose & Will - but it's been a long time since the Midds have been treated negatively in the press.

So, if Will wants to be rid of Kate, he will increase the heat on her and her family. He may not marry Rose. He, already has the kids, he can return to bachelor days w/photo ops with the children every so often.

[bold]William does not respect Kate,[/bold] has been thoughtlessly cruel to her before, and is capable of anything.

by Anonymousreply 11804/14/2019

That Rose woman is positively deformed.

Was she modelling for the blind?

by Anonymousreply 11904/14/2019

R118, who do you think has incentive for all these nasty stories now coming out? Hmm. I have a guess it involves a an ex-D List actress and her slimy PR agency.

by Anonymousreply 12004/14/2019

My favorite Marchioness is Lady Edith, Marchioness of Hexum.

by Anonymousreply 12104/14/2019

Kate Middleton is such a basic bitch as far as the Tatler set goes. Of course he got tired of that.

by Anonymousreply 12204/14/2019

You people need to realise that this is the British Royal Family, not “Survivor: Lochnagar”.

by Anonymousreply 12304/14/2019

The side chick looks like Eleanor Roosevelt.

by Anonymousreply 12404/14/2019

[quote]Well, it had to happen sooner or later...

What? That Godwin's Law was fulfilled or that the second in line to the throne is allegedly having an affair?

by Anonymousreply 12504/14/2019

He's not going anywhere. Men have affairs and never leave their wives. I have no doubt that Kate will be Queen.

by Anonymousreply 12604/14/2019

The thing with Kate is that she doesn't seem to have many interests or passions for different causes except for breeding. It's not like she's a notable patron of arts, championing social or environmental causes, whereas the women from that set usually have those interests and have something to talk about even if they will never work a day in the rest of their lives. That's what I meant when I characterized her as "basic."

by Anonymousreply 12704/14/2019

r120 - I agree with [italic]Vanity Fair France[/italic] and other French publications (Public) on how this developed.

1 - Will & Rose begin a relationship. 2 - Rose brags about it to Will's friends. The story spreads to all the Turnips and then beyond. 2 - Kate finds out, asks the Turnips to cut Rose off. (Something that will not happen, because Rose & Will are natural members of their set, Kate is an interloper.) 4 - The Turnips retaliate by letting the press get wind of it. Rose refuses to deny it.

Rose has the incentive. She already humiliated Kate among the Turnips, let it spread to other groups; so, of course, when Kate responds, she all the incentive to continue humiliating her in the press.

Not so much b/c it is Rose's interest, but b/c it is so damaging to Kate's position. I wonder if Will gave tacit approval.

Meghan has her own problems; I can't imagine after all the bennies the BRF have denied her (jewelry, KP apt, separate press office, frog house) that she pokes that hornet's nest. Meghan (IMO rightly so) is looking to monetize her position so that she can leave whenever she wants.

by Anonymousreply 12804/14/2019

You’re a member of their set, R128, are you? You seem quite familiar with them.

Or did you just read something in an article that quoted an article that was originally in Vanity Fair France?

by Anonymousreply 12904/14/2019

[quote]2 - Rose brags about it to Will's friends. The story spreads to all the Turnips and then beyond.

If William is as fiercely protective of his privacy as we have been led to believe, and if there was an affair, Rose committed a cardinal sin in his book by blabbing to friends., who blabbed to others, etc. to the point that the "whispers" would reach the press. This is a man who purportedly drops false details in conversations to see if it gets back to him or is leaked to the press. Talking indiscreetly would be enough for William to cut her off on his own without any intercession from his wife.

by Anonymousreply 13004/14/2019

Prince William likes to fuck. And so?

by Anonymousreply 13104/14/2019

R128 You have no idea how the aristocracy works. I saw it best described by the writer Jilly Cooper, who said that their attitude is (paraphrasing): marry well and produce an heir at all costs, then do what you like. Which neatly explains the sexual proclivities of the upper classes, and why they are relaxed about affairs, dodgy parentage issues with younger children and gay men marrying women, having an heir then carrying on as ever.

It’s only when those of us from the lower orders look at their behaviour through our own suburban lens that we get confused, disbelieving or outraged. It has always been thus and always will. R131 - you got it in one!

by Anonymousreply 13204/14/2019

r129 I am not a Turnip, I have a work mate in London who … well not a Turnip, but some type of vegetable. He confirmed that there was some trouble, didn't know details.

r130 That is the whole point isn't it. Why didn't Will cut Rose out? In the French press, she is identified as the one who spread the story to his friends. She seeded to the clouds so the press got hold of it. Moreover, the initial threats of lawsuits state that both families would go to the lawyers. The second threat (implemented) mentioned that "Rose has a wild side and doesn't care what's out there." Hmmm.

r132 I know how the British aristocracy works. That is what makes this story so strange. By all expectations, Kate would look the other way.

So the rumors start, Will doesn't cut Rose off, Kate insists. Odd sequence of events. I wonder what is going on? IMO - they want Kate to file for divorce. Why, who knows? Within whatever boundaries Will & Kate established for their marriage, this one crossed it.

by Anonymousreply 13304/14/2019

R133 Well of course you’re not a “turnip” - if you were, you’d realise that the last thing that members of any upper class set would be to use a name invented by the Daily Mail.

“Turnip toffs” FFS! Daily Mail bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 13404/14/2019

r134 - They call themselves that. Their form of wittiness.

by Anonymousreply 13504/14/2019

[quote]That is the whole point isn't it. Why didn't Will cut Rose out?

How do we know that he has or hasn't cut her off? Or that if Kate really delivered an ultimatum? Because William would run to Rose and say that his wife has given him an ultimatum and then she went to her friends and repeated the whole process? Does this no sound odd?

by Anonymousreply 13604/14/2019

What does “Turnip” mean?

by Anonymousreply 13704/14/2019

Does William have game? Does his willie get big?

by Anonymousreply 13804/14/2019

Norfolk, the county where they all live, is largely agricultural... toffs are posh people... so somebody conjured up Turnip Toffs to define the Norfolk crowd.

by Anonymousreply 13904/14/2019

Yes, R139 - some lazy hack in the Daily Mail invented it after a few pints at lunchtime. It’s what they do. They also invented “Her Royal Hotness” for Pippa Middleton at the time of her sister’s wedding. Didn’t take off. It’s what Daily Mail “journalists” do. Sometimes it gets picked up, sometimes it doesn’t.

by Anonymousreply 14004/14/2019

>How do we know that he has or hasn't cut her off? Or that if Kate really delivered an ultimatum? Because William would run to Rose and say that his wife has given him an ultimatum and then she went to her friends and repeated the whole process? Does this no sound odd?

We don't. And, yes, it sounds so odd.

The French press stated that Rose started the rumors. They stated that Kate wanted to cut Rose out. No one has said Will actually cut her off. There is more to this story!

by Anonymousreply 14104/14/2019

Will and Kate haven’t been seen in a while. Is that a coincidence? We’re appearences cancelled?

by Anonymousreply 14204/14/2019

[quote] My favorite Marchioness is Lady Edith, Marchioness of Hexum.

I cried when her husband, Jon-Erik died.

by Anonymousreply 14304/14/2019

R142 They were seen yesterday with their cousins the Tindalls. They have had no official engagements as it’s school holidays in the UK and they tend to stay at home with their children at these times, or go on holiday with them.

Like all conspiracy theorists you are looking for something which isn’t there.

by Anonymousreply 14404/14/2019

[quote]We’re appearences cancelled?

Oh DEAR!

by Anonymousreply 14504/14/2019

We’re appearences cancelled?

Two out of three ain't good.

by Anonymousreply 14604/14/2019

....

by Anonymousreply 14704/14/2019

They seem incapable of managing their PR. What a disaster.

by Anonymousreply 14804/14/2019

If they are, it'd seem it's because William is incapable of managing his willy

by Anonymousreply 14904/14/2019

Why would any woman want to sleep with him, anyway? He’s ghastly. Even uglier than his father.

by Anonymousreply 15004/14/2019

Kate needs to read up on Charles, Diana, and Tiggy Legge-Bourke.

by Anonymousreply 15104/14/2019

Much of this thread reads like dumb mean girls trying to spread gossip among other thirsty girls.

Incidentally, the same demographic who adore Meghan.

Just sayin'...

by Anonymousreply 15204/14/2019

Back to the thread title: just how does Prince William's lawyer try to suppress rumors of (William's) affair

...when everyone from here to China knows about it? So The Daily Fail and The Sun can't print it in the UK: big deal. Does his lawyer plan to sue the internet?

by Anonymousreply 15304/14/2019

Sure R150, and you’re a total looker, right?

He’s tall, fit, not unattractive, exceedingly rich, only going to get richer and will one day be Head of State of the United Kingdom and of the other Commonwealth realms. And he also allegedly has a big fat cock, hence his uni nickname of “Big Willy”.

Yeah nothing there to attract people. How many are lined up to shag you, R150? You don’t understand how the works works, do you?

by Anonymousreply 15404/14/2019

A journalist friend of mine here in the States recently visited the UK. My US journalist friend has her own journalist friend in the UK, who told my friend all about this William/Rose cheating story before it became public. Then, a couple of months later, the story became public just as the UK journalist said. William cheated. Rose leaked it to the press.

But while all this was happening a few months ago, the press and the palace (secretly) continued to push the story that Markle is a social climbing bitch who doesn't get along with Kate so as to cause a distraction from the William cheating story. And that's why Harry is pissed at William. Kate and Markle are different but don't have much of a problem with each other. Harry resents everyone dumping on Markle and using her as the distraction to hide William's cheating. But now that the William/Rose cheating story is public, the heat is slightly off Markle. However, Harry is still mad because Markle's reputation took a bad hit partly due to William and partly due to Markle herself. Now the palace is doing everything possible to squash any stories William. It's working a bit. But the damage between the Cambridges and the Sussexes is done and will take a long time to repair if it can be at all.

by Anonymousreply 15504/14/2019

^ what a load of rubbish.

by Anonymousreply 15604/14/2019

Would the public accept Rose as Queen? What will happen to Kate?

by Anonymousreply 15704/14/2019

R155 sounds plausible to me. Poor Kate. She seems quite admirable. How boring of William to cheat, and with a chinless aristo, how unoriginal. Dammit, this is making me feel sympathy for the Harkles!

by Anonymousreply 15804/14/2019

And Rose is chinless.

by Anonymousreply 15904/14/2019

Let's just put all this talk about who's the next queen, Kate or Rose, off for just a bit!

by Anonymousreply 16004/14/2019

[quote] My favorite Marchioness is Lady Edith, Marchioness of Hexum.

Is she related to Jon-Erik?

Oh, [italic]dear.[/italic]

by Anonymousreply 16104/14/2019

Kate should be addressed as Her Royal Basicness

by Anonymousreply 16204/14/2019

And all you people who believe that this cheating storey is true, believe it because, why? You read it somewhere? In the Fail? The Sun? People? In Touch?

So much stupid on these threads.

by Anonymousreply 16304/14/2019

^ “story”, obviously, before the few of you who can spell pile on.

by Anonymousreply 16404/14/2019

I posted this on another thread about this situation. The more I read about it, the more I wonder if it applies. First off, I'm surprised that there are people who are surprised about this. I'd be more surprised (going for 3!) if Will (or Kate ) *didn't* have affairs during the marriage. Those two won't get divorced, it would serve neither one well. However, expecting them to only have the other to fuck until death they do part is charmingly innocent, and highly unlikely (how boring!)

Emotional affairs are the truly dangerous ones, and I'm wondering if something like that went down in this case. Will's fuck may have evolved into fancy.

by Anonymousreply 16504/14/2019

I doubt Kate was cheating. She doesn’t appear to have much of a libido.

by Anonymousreply 16604/14/2019

Isn’t Kate hooking up with an ex or some sailor?

by Anonymousreply 16704/14/2019

R166 How do you know that she doesn’t have much of a libido?

by Anonymousreply 16804/14/2019

r155 Any idea why Rose leaked it? It occurred coincidentally b/t Meghan's baby shower and the birth. At the height Meghan-mania..

by Anonymousreply 16904/14/2019

She didn’t leak it on purpose re timing, r169. She told friends in confidence and they leaked it.

by Anonymousreply 17004/14/2019

How do you know this, R170?

by Anonymousreply 17104/14/2019

Rose didn't leak the story to the press. She told friends in confidence. Dammit, she wanted to tell someone that she was fucking the future king of England. Who wouldn't? But her secret didn't remain a secret. The friends, acquaintances leaked the news. It's difficult to contain such a scandal.

by Anonymousreply 17204/14/2019

How do you know this, R172?

It’s a serious question - when I see people making statements like “she told friends in confidence” I like to know if it’s based on facts or purely conjecture.

Besides, in those circles, shagging a prince wouldn’t be such a big deal if one is married to a Marquess - the Lord Great Chamberlain - and chatelaine of Cholmondeley Cadtle and Houghton Hall.

It’s not as if Rose is an office administrator from Slough.

by Anonymousreply 17304/14/2019

If Rose leaked it, it means she wants something out of it. Like a crown.

by Anonymousreply 17404/14/2019

R173, they got it from the media and some royal watcher's twitter account.

by Anonymousreply 17504/14/2019

I'm sure Kate doesn't give a fuck as long as she has her $$$ and title.

by Anonymousreply 17604/14/2019

Oh stop it R174 - you’ve been watching too much Game of Thrones. Fucking hell - the frauen on these friends sometimes beggar belief.

by Anonymousreply 17704/14/2019

“Some royal watcher’s twitter account”, R175?

Oh, that sounds completely plausible!

by Anonymousreply 17804/14/2019

R177 here - “threads” not “friends”

by Anonymousreply 17904/14/2019

For all we know, Will and Kate had a huge fight about something and he blurted it out.

Rose was born and raised in those circles. She wouldn't be that dumb to blab to someone she didn't know very well, and if she did tell a friend, I would assume that friend is from the same circle(s), and said friend would also not be that dumb. Maybe my fight theory is true, and one of the household staff went telling tales. I don't know.

I really don't think Rose is the leaker. To what end? She doesn't want Kate's job. None of Will's exes did. She already has plenty of money and she has far more freedom than Kate will ever see again. Why would she blow a good thing?

the "MeMe" troll can fuck off any time now. Way past your bedtime kid.

by Anonymousreply 18004/14/2019

R173. I know because my journalist friend told me that Rose told friends in confidence about her affair, and news like this doesn't remain a secret. The general consensus is that Rose did not leak the news, and the press did not find out about the affair from her. She told friends (as it turns out, unwisely) and word started spreading. And maybe the friend didn't say anything, but maybe a member of someone's staff said something. People talk no matter how much you swear them to secrecy--or think they don't know. Plus, there are all sorts of royal watchers/writers who have contacts within aristocratic circles. Affairs don't go unnoticed no matter how hard the two parties involved think they're keeping it a secret.

Do I know for certain that this is how things became public? No. But I know as much as my journalist friend told me who recently got back from the UK--and she got the news from fellow UK journalists. These journalists were dying to find out this news. They started asking around. Word got out.

by Anonymousreply 18104/14/2019

r181 Sounds plausible and straightforward to me. Occam's razor and all that.

I still don't know why hot head had to get his fucking lawyers involved. Now everyone looks bad in this. It could have gone away quietly, but no, he had to fan the flames.

Stupid, stupid move....and he's going to be King someday? Oy vey.

by Anonymousreply 18204/14/2019

Exactly R180 - why would anybody with a title, a couple of magnificent houses at their disposal and vast amounts of money want to marry into the royal family? If they wanted to, they would. The last member of the aristocracy to marry into the royal family was Diana. And we all know how well that worked out.

This story is quite possibly an invention that was planted with the press and which has no factual basis at all, but has then been picked up on boards such as this, then fed back to the press like the Mail, and had gone from being a story about a rumour to being a story about, what? Something someone invented?

I can see that the suburban housewives who have invaded DL would find it all very exciting but I believe that it’s just a tired rumour about two reasonably well known, reasonably rich, not unattractive people possibly fucking. Or probably not.

And as for R172 quoting their friend a journalist as a source - the British tabloids pay people to sit around and invent shit like this all day long. Sometimes the story gets picked up, as this one did, usually it’s just one day’s click bait and subsequently vanishes. Just because it appears online doesn’t make it real. Look at the massive volumes of shit on sites such as DL which people quite as gospel because they’ve seen it on...DL!

by Anonymousreply 18304/14/2019

R180 here,

Sorry the "MeMe" troll is on the other thread discussing this. I got my threads confused.

by Anonymousreply 18404/14/2019

R181, you do realize that the source of your journalist friend's info is the same as the royal watcher's posted up thread? Both are relying on gossip.

by Anonymousreply 18504/14/2019

Didn't I just see this on [italic] PBS Master's Piece Theater?

by Anonymousreply 18604/14/2019

Yes, people talk. Slightly off topic, but to prove my point: Last year, a key director of our staff at work was leaving the company. It was highly confidential because there was a question of whether this employee was leaving on his own or being fired, and it was going to leave a big void in the running of the company. There were basically three people who knew the details: the CEO, the chief of staff and this particular employee. No one else. However, one evening after hours (but not too late), the CEO was waiting for the elevator with the chief of staff. My office was right next door to the elevator. The CEO was talking about this employee leaving. The CEO did not know I was in my office, and as a result, I overheard the conversation. So now, I knew this top secret news. The elevator came, and the CEO and chief of staff got on the elevator and left the building.

I then discretely leaked the news to some other key executives who needed to know that this person was leaving. So yes, people talk. No one knew that I knew this information, and no one knew how I knew. But I knew. So someone on the royal staff or on the marchioness' staff could have overheard or seen something that no one else knew. Things happen. People talk, and sometimes you never know how they found out.

by Anonymousreply 18704/14/2019

Do I smell a burning caftan?

by Anonymousreply 18804/14/2019

Probably the fat gossipy Irish cook or that snippy chambermaid.

by Anonymousreply 18904/14/2019

[quote]Besides, in those circles, shagging a prince wouldn’t be such a big deal if one is married to a Marquess - the Lord Great Chamberlain - and chatelaine of Cholmondeley Cadtle and Houghton Hall.

It is a huge deal. If you don't understand that, cutting and pasting from Google and using one as a pronoun only makes you look even more foolish.

by Anonymousreply 19004/15/2019

It could also be the hot gardener David C was fucking on the side.

by Anonymousreply 19104/15/2019

George V slept with prostitutes. Britain stood alone against Hitler while the Yanks did nothing. Isn't a marquis a sort of tent? Now I would love to be styled a royal marchioness!

by Anonymousreply 19204/15/2019

R190 There was no cutting and pasting from Google (if there was it would be “copying” and pasting, btw). I’m interested in art and architecture and have always been interested in Houghton, particularly the dispersement of much of its art collection to Russia and its return for an exhibition at the house which I visited years ago. I was a punter before you try and get snide again, not a guest.

An alleged affair with Prince William would be less of a big deal for people at that level of the social structure than it would be for someone such as yourself, for example. That was my point which you’ve confirmed with your queeny overreaction.

You’re showing you’re insecurity about one’s use of “one” - luckily we don’t all speak American!

Don’t assume that everybody is as ill-informed and parochial as many of the posters on these threads.

by Anonymousreply 19304/15/2019

I was taught to use one as pronoun. It was forbidden to write you because 1) it switches the language to second person and 2) it's accusatory. Has this changed?

What is the status of [bold]one[/bold]

by Anonymousreply 19404/15/2019

Someone wise once told me: A secret is something everyone tells just one person.

by Anonymousreply 19504/15/2019

❤️ That r195 !

by Anonymousreply 19604/15/2019

They don't get many new friends in these circles so I assume they're already fucked each other once like a merry go round. I'm sure STD more so than gossip kills your social standing.

by Anonymousreply 19704/15/2019

R193, if titles and hierarchy are important in that crowd, isn’t hooking up with the future king kind of like grabbing the brass ring for some of them? Which is a different kind of big deal than it is for a member of the general public — for whom it would be more like having an affair with someone who is essentially just a very famous celebrity — but still a big deal. But maybe I don’t get it.

by Anonymousreply 19804/15/2019

R198, R193 here - I was just googling “brass ring” - still not sure what that means.

What I was saying is that for people in the British - primarily English and Scottish, aristocracy, someone with a British royal title doesn’t have the same impact as it does for the rest of us (including me).

They socialise with them, went to Eton or wherever with them, they’re usually related to each other (as are all the current non royal Dukes - all related and not distantly). It gets confusing when the rest of us look at their lives and try and view it through our experience - it just doesn’t work. I have been shot down in this forum before for saying this but for most English and Scottish aristocrats, the British Royal family is no big deal. Of course the Sovereign is at the top of the heap as the Fount of All Honours, but for most of them, the British royals are relatively recent, relatively arriviste Germans - “relative” being a relative term, of course.

Someone fucking the wife of the Duke of Cambridge? So what? He’s not particularly accomplished, pleasant featured, reasonably fit and born into the higher orders. They all are in that set - big deal!

Now I’ll step back and let the “experts” pile in!

by Anonymousreply 19904/15/2019

You’re saying “Of course the Sovereign is at the top of the heap” in one paragraph and then “but he’s just the Duke of Cambridge” in the next. But he’s not! The guy’s probably going to be king for 40 years.

by Anonymousreply 20004/15/2019

And that’s a big deal to you, R200 - “the guy’s probably going to be king for 40 years”. Hopefully. One day. And that’s a big deal to most of us.

But to the very small numbers who make up the British aristocracy, he’s also the bloke who they went to school with. Or who dated their sister. Or whatever.

I’m getting a bit exhausted trying to get this across, so it’s probably just me, but I’ll try again.

Not long after Diana Princess of Wales died, one of the glossies - probably Tatler or Vanity Fair - did a profile on William, who was at Eton at the time. William was walking down the high street (Eton is a town, not just a school) with a group of friends and another group of Eton lads approached and one of them, on seeing William, made an exaggerated bow in front of him, as a joke. William’s response? “Fuck off”.

That should tell you something about how the upper classes respond to the British royal family - they’re not necessarily as enamoured as the rest of us.

Or maybe not, but I’m tired of this argument, which, in the scheme of things, means nothing. The upper classes have never given a fuck about what the rest of us think. William fucking the wife of a neighbour? So what? They’ve all always been fucking each other, it just gets more coverage now, sadly.

by Anonymousreply 20104/15/2019

R198 “If titles and hierarchy are important in that crowd”.

That’s the point! They all have titles. Or are descended from people who do. Or are untitled but completely grand with a history that can be traced back way before most of the current Dukes.

They are much less likely to be impressed with a Duke (royal or otherwise) or a Marquess, Earl, Viscount or Baron than the vast majority of the population who have no title or grand lineage.

Because that’s their default. They all know each other. They’re almost always related. It’s a very small world.

If you don’t believe me try looking up one of the current non Royal dukes on Wikipedia. Check out their mother. They’ll likely be the daughter or grand daughter of another duke. Keep going with her forebears. You can disappear down a rabbit hole trying to follow it.

by Anonymousreply 20204/15/2019

Here are some Dukes: Westminster. Buccleuch. Norfolk. Bedford. Richmond. Northumberland. Beaufort. Hamilton.

All related. Will become more distantly so as there’s less pressure to marry other aristocrats.

by Anonymousreply 20304/15/2019

[quote] The guy’s probably going to be king for 40 years.

Or not. Sometimes people die much sooner than you'd think.

by Anonymousreply 20404/15/2019

Read more history, little Georgie.

by Anonymousreply 20504/15/2019

R205 I still think Margaret Beaufort had the princes in the Tower killed. I never totally trusted that bitch. Religious zealots are the worst.

by Anonymousreply 20604/15/2019

Bring William to me. His mother is rolling over in her grave. He needs to disciplined.

by Anonymousreply 20704/15/2019

Was any eye contact made between these two at the outing? Seems frosty to me. You would think they would put on a better front to refute the stories right now.

by Anonymousreply 20804/16/2019

Hard to put up a front r208, when you're seething with rage, and righteous indignation.

by Anonymousreply 20904/16/2019

Putting on a united front for the press and the kids.

There's not interaction between them. It just smelt and felt fake.

by Anonymousreply 21004/16/2019

I'm certain Wills will not succumb to any temptation.

- Grampa Pa Philip

by Anonymousreply 21104/16/2019

No one can outrun pussy. When pussy's chasing you... well you just can't run THAT fast!

by Anonymousreply 21204/16/2019

He showed Rose his chopper and she was smitten!

by Anonymousreply 21304/16/2019

And by chopper, he means cock.

by Anonymousreply 21404/16/2019

I do! I do!

by Anonymousreply 21504/16/2019

R208 If they showed up looking happy and interacting with each other it would only fuel the gossip. They're frosty with each other most of the time. The party line is that they don't do PDAs because PDAs are unprofessional. The most you'll get from the Cambridges is a peck on the cheek at polo, or an arm around the shoulder/waist. That's basically frottage for them.

by Anonymousreply 21604/16/2019

And speaking of frottage...

by Anonymousreply 21704/16/2019

And speaking of frottage, in a few (ahem) hours, I'll be back at SH merching.

- "I love the night life....gotta boogie...."

by Anonymousreply 21804/16/2019

R211 - that's the former Penelope Eastwood with Philip in the photo. She's now Countess Mountbatten. Her husband is bending down behind her. She was also seen with Prince Charles when he was a bachelor. She either gets around or they're just family.

by Anonymousreply 21904/16/2019

Interesting story about Penelope. In 2010, her husband swanned off to the Bahamas to live with another woman. Ms Penny took over the management of Broadlands, the ancestral home. A few years later, he skulked back and she put him up in the barn. I'm sure it was a renovated barn but the point being, he was not allowed in the house. They appeared together at their daughter's wedding but Prince Charles walked her down the aisle. He was described as not well enough to do that. Other reports are that he has Alzheimer s.

A lot of sadness in that family. The IRA bombing that killed his grandparents and younger brother, the youngest daughter's death at age 5, the son's heroin addiction.

by Anonymousreply 22004/17/2019

You know you're on the way out when you've been told to start calling them "Sir" and "Ma'am" instead of "William" and "Kate" as you always have.

by Anonymousreply 22104/17/2019

Que, r221?

by Anonymousreply 22204/17/2019

Bringing my comment from the other thread about this.

OK, how many days has it been now?

I'm thinking it's serious. They would have released some new photos of the kids, or done a FAR better photo op than the one above with the Tindall's. Full charm offensive, happy happy, joy joy.

My guess is Hot head Willy is getting chewed out by HM, Charles, various courtiers and his wife person Kate whatshername, and he is listening to NO ONE. That seems to be his M.O.

He's fucking up. This feels like deliberate self sabotage. Maybe he just wants out.

by Anonymousreply 22304/17/2019

Did they have any appearances for this month that were cancelled? Seems they were everywhere a month ago and now nowhere to be found.

by Anonymousreply 22404/17/2019

R216 remember when Kate went for William’s inner thigh at Eugenie’s wedding and he removed her hand, LOL!

by Anonymousreply 22504/17/2019

I got as far as R52 and was wondering when the yank/limey bickering would start. But...WW2 ? Really ? How fucking old are you ? That is literally playground stuff.

Besides, this is a largely American based site and there are endless threads about the Royals. Seems to me a whole load of you give way more of a shit about them than we do.

You’re totally right about them being leeches though.

by Anonymousreply 22604/17/2019

R216 any photos or video of that? I don’t remember seeing that...

by Anonymousreply 22704/17/2019

R227 They did an awkward side hug at a sporting event some years ago r227. That's all I can recall in the physical affection department. The tabs went wild when they saw the stills. Then the video came out, and it was like a millisecond of excitement about the team, not each other. The vid has since probably been scrubbed.

by Anonymousreply 22804/17/2019

R199 is quite correct.

by Anonymousreply 22904/17/2019

Can we please speak more about the Prince's COCK!!!!!!!!!!! This is a sex affair. Do you think Prince William is kinky? Does he like a rim job? Do they use condoms? Is it a kinky, old school thrill for the Marchioness to have royal splooge in her twat?

by Anonymousreply 23004/17/2019

[quote] Is it a kinky, old school thrill for the Marchioness to have royal splooge in her twat?

As R199 points out, toffs aren't impressed by HRH Prince William, Duke of Campbridge, future king. Rose is merely having a bit of fun with "Big Willy" from the neighbourhood. The nickname is clearly ironic so one hopes he's skilled with all his muscles, particularly those that protrude and those with prehensility .

by Anonymousreply 23104/17/2019

Wills has “lousy lay” written all over him.

by Anonymousreply 23204/17/2019

Yeah, Kate does all the "heavy lifting" in that department, I imagine, r232.

by Anonymousreply 23304/17/2019

Charles’ nudes, at age 45, as reported by the Bild Zeitung:

[quote]A German newspaper published a colour nude photo of Prince Charles on its front page on Wednesday (7/9), hazy in detail but explicit enough to distinguish his genitals. "Large shoulders, muscular arms, a hairy, virile torso. Not an ounce too much fat, but just enough. A royal silhouette," the mass-circulation Bild Zeitung reported, claiming to have published the first nude photo of the heir to the British Crown. The picture shows the Prince of Wales with only a white towelling robe thrown carelessly over his shoulders. "His 1.85-metre (six-foot-one-inch) frame is cut like a Greek statue. And this at 45," wrote the paper, which sells 4.5 million copies a day.

by Anonymousreply 23404/17/2019

EW!!

by Anonymousreply 23504/17/2019

He looks paunchy

by Anonymousreply 23604/17/2019

Yeah, no fucking thanks...

by Anonymousreply 23704/17/2019

A lot of pubes!

- Not Camilla

by Anonymousreply 23804/17/2019

R237 My eyes! It burns!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 23904/17/2019

William strikes me as a chest waxer.

by Anonymousreply 24004/17/2019

Is Chuck really 6"1"? He looks so tiny now.

by Anonymousreply 24104/17/2019

"Is Chuck really 6"1"?"

No.

by Anonymousreply 24204/17/2019

[quote] "Is Chuck really 6"1"?"

Around the time he married Diana he was 5' 11". She was 5' 10" in bare feet, so if she wore heels, she'd tower over him.

by Anonymousreply 24304/18/2019

Chuck looks presentable for his age in those pics. He could have tried to keep fit. He was kinda sporty when he was in his 20's.

by Anonymousreply 24404/18/2019

R243 Thanks for the accurate info. Hard to trust any news sources these days...

by Anonymousreply 24504/18/2019

Prince William in New Zealand for Anzac Day.

Does that face say "doing my duty" or "happy to be 20-thousand kilometres away from my wife"?

by Anonymousreply 24604/24/2019

I don't know if all of the rumors are true but they all make me very sad. I don't want to think it but it seems like everything has gone to hell since Meghan joined the fray. Am I wrong?

by Anonymousreply 24704/24/2019

[quote] IMO, there is blood in the water re Kate & Midds, they are no longer under William's protection. In fact, the anti-Midd articles are more problematic than the Rose affair.

I also noticed the timing of the Middleton supposed failing business articles. I was surprised that Kate's mother would be forced to subsequently issue a huge rebuttal immediately after publication and wondered why the Palace didn't better "manage" the Middleton business fallout. Kate & the Middletons would be feeling a little vulnerable, I would imagine. It makes a bit more sense now with the alleged Will and Kate marital strife.

by Anonymousreply 24804/24/2019

Kate looks like she's 1: emaciated - we're into Vera-Ellen territory now, and 2: vibrating like a tuning fork.

She's working very hard - and not succeeding - in trying to make it look like everything's OK.

by Anonymousreply 24904/24/2019

Hilarious. Has the cheating gene from his ugly dad. He will end up with some ugly cuntfrau just like daddy.

by Anonymousreply 25004/24/2019

[quote] "Marchioness of Cholmondeley" sounds much more regal and aristocratic than "Duchess of Cambridge

That's hilarious

Cholmondeley, I don't think you are saying that word the way it's supposed to be pronounced.

It's pronounced Chumley. Not exactly classy.

by Anonymousreply 25104/24/2019

my DeAr, depArted aNglophile fAther tAughT mE hOw tO prOnOuncE "CHolmondeley" whEn i was jUst a wee lad

by Anonymousreply 25204/24/2019

[quote] I don't want to think it but it seems like everything has gone to hell since Meghan joined the fray. Am I wrong?

Not only are you wrong. You're a stupid dope. Meghan has nothing to do with William cheating on his wife. Judging by that phony smile on Kate's face when she's face to face with Rose and her hilarious bad acting and super rictus grin at the Christening of Louis, he's probably been cheating on her for a long time

by Anonymousreply 25304/24/2019

The Cholmondeley’s houses Cholmondeley Castle and Houghton Hall are much nice than Windsor Castle and especially Buckingham Palace.

by Anonymousreply 25404/24/2019

We want to know about where Willy been sticking his Willy

by Anonymousreply 25504/24/2019

I think Rose let the affair be known to enhance her status. Despite her position, home and wealth, she basically sold herself to a man old enough to be her father who was publicly described as 'not the marrying kind.' Other women in her set would certainly make a meal of that. So she upgraded herself as the lover of the future king.

by Anonymousreply 25604/24/2019

How to Pronounce Cholmondeley

by Anonymousreply 25704/25/2019

[quote] Meghan has nothing to do with William cheating on his wife.

Wrong! Meghan has everything to do with everything!

by Anonymousreply 25804/25/2019

Harry will be at the Anzac Day service with Kate.

by Anonymousreply 25904/25/2019

I’m surprised but otoh who says royalties possess higher morals than the commoners? I think it’s more likely the opposite.

by Anonymousreply 26004/25/2019

I would have definitely given younger Charles a go. He had decent size even flacid and given how sporty he was - probably not a lousy lay.

by Anonymousreply 26104/25/2019

It’s actually really cunty of KP to release the HARRY AND MEGHAN ARE MOVING TO AFRICA! rumour when she’s pregnant. I don’t know, it’s tacky as fuck because it’s pretty upsetting.

Plus there’s something so colonialist and wrong headed about it. I have to remind myself that these people believe they have the finest bred bloodlines and were ordained by God to rule.

by Anonymousreply 26204/25/2019

R259 I am sure Kate is lovely to Meghan to her face. There’s no weird body language between them in public. Behind her back, though, I am sure Kate caters to William in every way.

I saw an interview with a comic who attended Marlborough just before or just after Kate did and she dated a bunch of his mates. He also said there was ask ally only one black guy in the school who was dragged around to be photographed and put in advertising materials. It’s a very rarified atmosphere she grew up in.

by Anonymousreply 26304/25/2019

I don’t find him attractive, but Charles has a nice hairy body back in the day as this publicity stunt with an Australian model shows.

by Anonymousreply 26404/25/2019

would u be able to crawl into bed with tht frau of his ev nite????

hell no

by Anonymousreply 26504/25/2019

Twitter says Rose blabbed and William allegedly told the tabloids to go after Meghan to get the heat off himself.

If that’s true, it’s pretty horrible. No wonder Harry’s pissed.

by Anonymousreply 26604/25/2019

Harry and Kate going to Anzac Day Services. Kate seems happy with Harry, doesn’t she?

It was mentioned Meghan is due any day and Harry wasn’t announced as attending. This is last minute. They must have put him out there so Kate wasn’t alone. I wonder how well they’re getting along now after the news that William threw Meghan under the bus to cover for his own indiscretions.

by Anonymousreply 26704/25/2019

This is Kate’s happy expression inside the service.

by Anonymousreply 26804/25/2019

She’ll learn to live with it.

by Anonymousreply 26904/25/2019

Nah, we know who leaked.

by Anonymousreply 27004/25/2019

I think she’s been living with it a long time. The British papers finally decided to stop covering up for it for some reason. So she’s embarrassed and as you can imagine, a lot of people are saying William’s mother suffered from her husband’s infidelity, why did he not spare his wife the same?

There are a lot of people online saying they are disappointed with William, and wondering whether he’ll leave Kate for Rose. They claim it’s an actual love affair. Rose is apparently broadcasting it everywhere and that’s how it got out.

The problem with this is that Charles was seen as the dirty old man that couldn’t keep his pants zipped and William as the nice family man. Now he’s just another asshole. People are wondering about the long term damage to the Crown. All the mystery is gone. Just one amoral horndog after another. If they lose the commoners, they’re done.

by Anonymousreply 27104/25/2019

R270, it’s being reported today that the reason the anti-Meghan stuff was printed, instead of shutting it up as usual, is that William gave them the go ahead to publish, to divert people from his own marital problems. That’s why people are talking about it today.

by Anonymousreply 27204/25/2019

I think that is Latham's move, while William is currently in New Zealand. The trending on Twitter is army/fanbase led, I feel.

by Anonymousreply 27304/25/2019

They sent Harry to church to accompany Kate, which wasn’t planned. I wonder if Kate really did have a falling out with Meghan behind the scenes, which makes it very awkward, and this is a pity date by Harry to someone who was unkind to his wife.

So now the speculation is that they will try to give a lot of attention to the new baby, to draw it away from William and Kate. So what about Africa?

by Anonymousreply 27404/25/2019

If you had a life of your own, you wouldn't need to waste time worrying about others who you don't know and who's actions won't affect you in any way.

by Anonymousreply 27504/25/2019

Cholmondely is pronounced "chum lee".

Silly Brits.

by Anonymousreply 27604/25/2019

Those broad, camera ready smiles of Kate and Harry were posed as fuck

by Anonymousreply 27704/25/2019

How does one pronounce marchioness?

by Anonymousreply 27804/25/2019

[quote]I wonder if Kate really did have a falling out with Meghan behind the scenes, which makes it very awkward, and this is a pity date by Harry to someone who was unkind to his wife.

No, I think this is all about William. William doesn't like Meghan and I think Kate does what her husband tells her to do. I think it's time to take the rose colored glasses off when it comes to Wills. You take Will out of the equation and all of a sudden everyone is getting along and happy.

by Anonymousreply 27904/25/2019

MM was not the source of the leak. DLers here heard about the Cambridges months ago. I’m so sick of reading people post stuff they made up. I will go so far as to say the leak came not from the Windsor blood relations, nor did it come from MM or Rose. The info I heard came from a connection to someone else. Anyone with two brain cells should be able to figure it out.

by Anonymousreply 28004/25/2019

Meghan is the source of every bad thing that ever happened to the Royals according to the Markle haters on DL.

by Anonymousreply 28104/25/2019

[quote]Anyone with two brain cells should be able to figure it out.

Unfortunately, I left one of mine at home.

by Anonymousreply 28204/25/2019

I aim to please.

by Anonymousreply 28304/25/2019

I think they’re all bonkers, r281. There may very well be issues, but they bring forth incredibly stupid reasons she’s the devil: she was photographed turning her back on the queen! She accidentally wore a price tag on her dress! She signed a banana! She looks mean! She didn’t wear hosiery! Honestly it reminds me of the Republican rant against Obama. At the heart, you knew it was racism, but they went out of their way to deny it and come up with a myriad of stupid reasons to hate him.

by Anonymousreply 28404/25/2019

What's so hard about believing that Rose blabbed to her friends, maybe after they saw something at one of their drunken parties, Harry got wind of it through the gravevine, told MM, and she got one of her PR people to contact the Sun.

by Anonymousreply 28504/25/2019

Because... that’s not what happened r285? You’re making up a story to fit your opinion. A ton of people knew there were problems, and any one of them could have talked, but it had to be MM because you hate her.

by Anonymousreply 28604/25/2019

R284, some Brits are speculating on twitter that the only reason the British press was allowed to make an uproar over this trivial stuff is to give them something to print that wasn’t about William.

Think about it, since when does the palace sit there and do nothing while a member of the Firm gets pilloried in the press? And since when does the British press run with it?

Criticizing someone for signing a banana? That’s like Republicans criticizing Obama for wearing a tan suit.

by Anonymousreply 28704/25/2019

Well, when you look for a perp, R286, you look for motive-means-opportunity. Who had more motive for throwing the Cambs under the bus than MM?

But of course we'll never know....

by Anonymousreply 28804/25/2019

I don’t think Meghan would actually step on any toes to mark her mark.

She seems the type to be overly enthusiastic and super friendly and try really hard and their British sardonic selves probably find her a bit too much and maybe at worst a bit annoying, but no one other than William (and Fergie and Air Miles, but who’d give a shit) actually hates her.

I am sure William dislikes her quite a bit because she has the same interests as Harry does in a bigger way, which gives him even less control over his brother. He has no compunction in finding Meghan a useful person to throw under the bus to distract from his own failings, which crushes Harry considering how carefully he ushered Kate into the fold.

As for Kate, I agree with r279 that she knows which side her bread his buttered and follows William’s lead. She doesn’t dislike Meghan but has not welcomed her into the family.

I bet the “Meghan made Kate cry after Charlotte’s dress fitting!” story was Kate crying because she was hormonal and pregnant. William/KP found implying Kate cried because Meghan yelled at staff/Charlotte a useful way of sabotaging the success of the Pacific tour.

by Anonymousreply 28904/25/2019

R288 but we do know. I already told you she wasn’t the ultimate source of the info I heard.

by Anonymousreply 29004/25/2019

William is slated to be king someday. It's gone to his head already. He was older (15) when Diana died and maybe he was able to see her and his parent's relationship more accurately than did Harry who was, what, 12 at the time? He also saw his father getting away with, if not murder, then at the very least very public adultery. I suspect he's considerably more cynical than Harry while at the same time seemingly more willing to exercise his [italic]droit du seigneur[/italic], so to speak, now that the matter of the heir and a spare is settled.

It's not about Meg. Despite the denials here and in the tabloid press, racism and xenophobia plain and simple are the biggest reasons she's getting shit on. Her family circus isn't a plus, but what would her new family do if they were loving, caring people? Not what they've done. Whether or not William let Megan take the heat to distract from his own issues is another matter, but he needs to be seen for what he is; another lazy, none too bright toff who has been raised to think the country is going to revolve around him sooner or later so he might as well get all the tail he can now.

Whether he was a shitty person to start with or became a shitty person for lack of anything better to do with his time and libido is irrelevant. If the story of his affair or affairs is true, William's a shitty person now and everyone around him is just collateral damage at this point.

by Anonymousreply 29104/25/2019

R288 The DoS may or may not hate the Cambridges. Tabloid speculation is titillating but it's not fact. You don't know any of the people involved so there may be motives that you couldn't possibly know.

Speculation alert: It's possible that the Sussexes and the Cambridges agreed to spin the yarn about the feud to cover for William. They're all "in on it" together. It's easier to deal with a fake feud than it is to face the media when you have real marital troubles.

by Anonymousreply 29204/25/2019

I think Wills has had a lifetime of seeing people suck up to you to your face and stab you in the back later.

Unfortunately, the very qualities that make Kate a good wife, mother and princess/queen-to-be render her dull and insipid. I wouldn't be surprised if Rose preyed on Wills and grabbed the opportunity.

by Anonymousreply 29304/25/2019

Does anyone know for a fact that he cheated?

by Anonymousreply 29404/25/2019

The British press is finally printing it so I guess they do. They’d get their socks sued off if they didn’t.

by Anonymousreply 29504/25/2019

Did they infer it or state it out right?

by Anonymousreply 29604/25/2019

R295 The British press said "rural rival." Has that been updated to "mistress?"

by Anonymousreply 29704/25/2019

"William’s mother suffered from her husband’s infidelity, why did he not spare his wife the same?"

Why don't all the other billions of men on the planet who grew up seeing the same and don't have as many opportunities do so? Are you a woman? You sound like a woman.

by Anonymousreply 29804/25/2019

Can I smell women in here? Where's my pitchfork?

by Anonymousreply 29904/25/2019

JOKE

by Anonymousreply 30004/25/2019

Why do alcoholics have children who are alcoholics? Same reason parents who cheat have kids who cheat.

by Anonymousreply 30104/25/2019

I love how Harry's last minute addition to the Guestlist upstages Kate's principle role.

by Anonymousreply 30204/25/2019

"it’s being reported today that the reason the anti-Meghan stuff was printed, instead of shutting it up as usual, is that William gave them the go ahead to publish, to divert people from his own marital problems. That’s why people are talking about it today.

r272 Where is this being reported, exactly? Links please anyone?

by Anonymousreply 30304/25/2019

The subtext of Harry's attendance was, 'even though I'm expecting my first baby, I'm not lazy enough to skip public duties like someone around here'.

by Anonymousreply 30404/25/2019

The Palace finally realizes they have a real public relations nightmare. The photo's have shown everyone that there is a huge problem between William and Harry. So they send William off to New Zealand for a couple of days and then they place Harry and Kate to the same event. And they are quite comfortable together. Warm even.

So we now know the William cheating rumors are true. I don't blame Harry one bit! He deserves to be pissed; even Kate realizes it. William needs to eat some humble pie when he returns and try to make some kind of peace with Harry.

The problem is William. But this also sets up the perfect scenario for Meghan to be in a continued snit. I watched those boys when Diana died. I really hope they can get through this and be brothers again.

by Anonymousreply 30504/25/2019

r290 I sure don't fucking know. Just spit out the name if you have one. If you don't have one, shut the fuck up. You have shown up on every fucking thread about William and Kate and this affair, dangling your most likely fake carrot about who REALLY blabbed, and that WE all know. Take your royal WE and shove it up your ass, or give us the name.

You don't have one. You are in some square state with your stupid Frau fantasies trying to make yourself feel important.

by Anonymousreply 30604/25/2019

So many ways to have a discreet affair & he cheats in his own backyard and with his wife's friend. He's garbage.

by Anonymousreply 30704/25/2019

And Charles and Camilla take off to sit it out in Scotland. For some reason, I find that funny. They want no part of it. And missed the Queens birthday on top of it.

by Anonymousreply 30804/25/2019

It was trending on twitter this am here is onevthread

by Anonymousreply 30904/25/2019

Now we know why harry & meghan want to head out tonafrica for a while- wills is being a dick like his father

by Anonymousreply 31004/25/2019

Thank you R309 But someone floating an idea on Twitter does not a news source make. It's not even a verified account. Bless.

R290 I'm waiting for the name you refuse to drop because you don't have one.

by Anonymousreply 31104/25/2019

Wills will win though, even though he's in the wrong.

Have to remember this family thrives on deference and out of all of them, there is only one of them who will be king, eventually.

Being a dick or otherwise.

by Anonymousreply 31204/25/2019

R310 Visual evidence at R237 suggests that Will is a dick bigger than his father.

by Anonymousreply 31304/25/2019

Pretty much r312. This is nothing new whatsoever.

They all get a bit sloppy from time to time, and then after a while we forget. Anyone who sees the possible exposure of a future king's sidepiece as having the potential to bring down the monarchy is fucking deluded. Go play in the insane asylum that is the BRF thread.

by Anonymousreply 31404/25/2019

A 20 year old girl tweets something on Twitter and it's taken as gospel by DLers. Righty ho then.

by Anonymousreply 31504/25/2019

If torontopaper is to be taken seriously (and I don’t know if it is), then MM seems to be trying to extort some sort of payment from the RF.

Wouldn’t it be fabulous if she faked the pregnancy, then threatened to reveal the fakery unless they cut her a check?

But what would the exit plan be? Fake miscarriage? Bit late for that (and unbelievably bad juju.)

Though I suppose it’s probably more a run of the mill “pay me to go away” divorce situation.

by Anonymousreply 31604/25/2019

Who is Nicole Cliffe? She sounds a little more knowledgeable than most of the tweeters? I think someone posted some of her earlier tweets on here?

by Anonymousreply 31704/25/2019

r317 I know of that chick. A bit too Jesus-y for me, and I find her to be a rather dull writer, but whatever. All she is doing is regurgitating what little we already know.

Nothing new to see, and something tells me it is going to stay that way. UNFORTUNATELY, as I am dying for some dirt.

by Anonymousreply 31804/25/2019

She's a Canadian. Not a Royal expert.

by Anonymousreply 31904/25/2019

She's a God botherer.

by Anonymousreply 32004/25/2019

To the jackass at r309. 1) DL knew months ago that the Cambridges were having problems and 2) check my post at r280, if you can read. But hey, if your fantasy world suits your life, go ahead and stay in it. The thing that pisses me off are the fucking fantasies people concoct, only because they hate someone. But whatever, you can believe me or not believe. But please do fuck off.

by Anonymousreply 32104/25/2019

Who's your royal source, R321? A waiter who saw the Cambridges having a tiff at dinner?

by Anonymousreply 32204/25/2019

Why yes, r322, it was! You’re so smart! And Kate threw a drink at William, just like in the movies! Then they had makeup sex and all was good again!

by Anonymousreply 32304/25/2019

r321 You are really quite the asshole, aren't you?

Do disabuse those that are spouting these "fantasies" that frustrate you so, with this precious "fact" you keep insisting you have but will not share. Otherwise, you are as much of a fantasist as those you accuse of being.

if you aren't going to name names on an anonymous board even though you INSIST that you are the ONLY one on here that knows the ACTUAL source, than just fuck on off back to the BRF nuthouse please and take your tired "I know something you don't know" childish games with you.

by Anonymousreply 32404/25/2019

R324, I already shared the “fact,” dickhead. Geez now you’ll tell me I’m repeating myself. It would be helpful if you could read. This is a message board, after all. And anyone who has two brain cells to rub together can figure out the source of my info if you look at my post at r280.

Oh wait, you only have one.

by Anonymousreply 32504/25/2019

FAIL R325 Maybe YOU need to read your own fucking tedious post that you keep fucking advertising. You don't say who it is, you just say who it isn't. It's actually as clear as mud. Our reading skills are fine. Your writing skills are not. You can't give us a name because you don't have one. You have reached your attention quota for the day. Bye! *click*

by Anonymousreply 32604/25/2019

Wouldn't it be great if R325 was Princess Charlotte and R326 was Prince George?

by Anonymousreply 32704/25/2019

R326, really?? I’m heartbroken!

by Anonymousreply 32804/25/2019

R321 is Giles Coren, sitting there with his wife's bra on.

by Anonymousreply 32904/25/2019

Sorry, not R321, apologies! The nut upthread.

by Anonymousreply 33004/25/2019

Oh it could be R321, ffs. Giles is everywhere, putting it about, the alkie.

by Anonymousreply 33104/25/2019

R321 is totally unhinged.

And constantly fishing for compliments.

I don't know what's worse.

by Anonymousreply 33204/25/2019

If I read the post correctly at r280, the source was Kate herself (or someone in her family).

by Anonymousreply 33304/25/2019

Where the hell did you get that, R333? Kate and her family would be the last people on earth to put out a story like that.

by Anonymousreply 33404/25/2019

This article continues to be the most reasoned discussion of the matter, in my view. Is this Giles person really so important that his tweet confirming there was an affair, is what made KP shit their pants? I don't know a thing about him, aside from what I have read in the article below. Anyone care to fill me in, or is not worth the keystrokes?

"Coren’s intervention into the story came when, in response to one of the Rose/Kate “feud” pieces, he tweeted, “Yes, it is an affair. I haven’t read the piece but I know about the affair. Everyone knows about the affair, darling.”

It was an extraordinary allegation for a prominent newspaper staff writer to make on Twitter and it was swiftly deleted."

by Anonymousreply 33504/25/2019

She didn’t leak it to the press obviously, r333 (at least I don’t think so). I took it to mean she told someone, possibly in confidence, and it leaked from there.

by Anonymousreply 33604/25/2019

That makes no sense, R336. If she told a friend in confidence, she would surely want it to remain confidential. It's humiliating to Kate. What motivation would such a friend have? If a friend did that, she'd be exiled for life, or worse.

If I had to guess, and had to exclude MM, I would say it was either one of the turnip toff gals who secretly hated Kate or a palace servant who overheard Wills and Kate rowing about it.

by Anonymousreply 33704/25/2019

If Kate told anyone, it would have been Carole. Carole is the last fucking person on this planet that would disturb all that she worked on for decades by leaking something so damaging to the press. Has she manipulated them in the past? Certainly. This is on another level entirely, and she isn't stupid. Not a fan of Carole, but that bitch is the master of the long game. So nope, not Carole. Nice try. Next!

by Anonymousreply 33804/25/2019

That that pretty much leaves Rose's husband as the source. If it's one of those arrangement marriages, he might be okay with it, just as Camilla's first husband supposedly was (while getting his own, on the side). He told someone and they leaked it.

by Anonymousreply 33904/25/2019

r337 Kate should have made a closer circle of friends early on. She doesn't seem to "friend" easily, and never has. She has her family, and that seems to be about the extent of it. That said, I don't see one of the Toffs breaking their stupid toff code just because they all still privately think that Kate is an parvenu who acts to the manor born. (Lose that fake posh accent Kate, a good first step).

Occam's razor, boring as hell, my guess is that it was a staffer who overheard/witnessed something and blabbed.

by Anonymousreply 34004/25/2019

What if it wasn't really Rose that leaked this but someone higher up in the food chain with more to gain? i.e. Camilla and Charles---anything to make them look better as the Queen gets up there in age and makes Charles look less of a mess and easier to accept. Tarnish golden boy Willy so the people don't want Charlie boy to abdicate .

by Anonymousreply 34104/25/2019

You always have to think "Cui bono?" Who benefits? If it wasn't someone with an almighty grudge to settle against the Cambridges, then it surely must have been staff, because palace staff wages are absolute shit, and the tabs pay big money for clickbait gold.

by Anonymousreply 34204/25/2019

While not his finest moment, it's not like William got caught eating a baby or whatever. He had an affair. Big fucking deal. They all do. It was how he handled it after being caught (going to the lawyers) that is tarnishing. It not only made him look guilty as fuck (and thus even more embarrassing for Kate) he came off looking like a spoiled, spastic little hot-head. Not very King like.

Unless this is the tip of one hell of an iceberg that we know nothing about (doubt it, again: Occam's razor), and the affair with Rose is being used distract from said iceberg (there isn't one, we are all just bored and want some drama) this is all going to fizz out sooner than later.

by Anonymousreply 34304/25/2019

Actually, it is a big deal, because the public are rightly furious that the cash-guzzling Sussexes are such a massive trainwreck and the Cambridges were supposed to be the perfect golden family. to compensate Feet of clay, sadly..

by Anonymousreply 34404/25/2019

And yet, R340, I've read that she is still close with a group of her friends from school. I've also read that Rose and husband were entertained twice at Amer Hall and they hosted Kate and Will twice. Of course they can meet at other houses and events but that doesn't sound like they were best friends. Who knows. We think they must be followed and photographed 24/7 but they actually aren't.

by Anonymousreply 34504/25/2019

Lets talk about all the players.

Will = future King. He will skate by and will do what he wants. Public opinion may turn, but the public is fickle and he can them back with a couple of Diana events or something.

Kate = Queen Consort. If Will is not fucking her, then she doesn't have to put out. She'll take care of her kids, spend time with her family and be the Queen and do what she likes doing best -- nothing.

Harry = Is pissed at William, but he'll get over it and the brothers will bond again. They've had spats before. The difference between the two is that Harry has sewn his wild oats. He's partied and fucked and had his fun. He's with someone who likes what he likes and compliments him and now he wants to go and save the world. More power to him.

Meghan = By next year, she will have adjusted completely to royal life and the baby is going to get her all sorts of positive press. She'll probably pop out one more and then she and Harry will go around saving the world together. All of her negative press has been either family related or rookie mistakes, that she will overcome in time.

Rose - Now that she has been named. I would expect Meghan's negative press to move to Rose. And the press will be looking for ways to talk up the affair.

by Anonymousreply 34604/25/2019

Anyone who thought the Cambridges, or ANYONE in the royal family are/were perfect or golden is pathetically naive. I don't understand the revisionist history around William and Kate and never will. But I have a looooooooooooong memory. No one really thought of them as god's gift. They are basic as fuck. Beige with legs. This is the most interesting thing to be talked about in years concerning them.

by Anonymousreply 34704/25/2019

Meghan is NEVER going to adjust to royal life as she will never be happy with planning second fiddle.

by Anonymousreply 34804/25/2019

r346 Works for me.

Hopefully Rose has a backbone and can tough it out with her money and her friends while this all sorts out. I think it will blow over for everyone, and soon.

Why does MM keep getting brought up? Take that to the BRF viper's nest. Shitting on her is so fucking tedious.

by Anonymousreply 34904/25/2019

[quote] Meghan = By next year, she will have adjusted completely to royal life and the baby is going to get her all sorts of positive press. She'll probably pop out one more and then she and Harry will go around saving the world together. All of her negative press has been either family related or rookie mistakes, that she will overcome in time.

What utter nonsense.

by Anonymousreply 35004/25/2019

Rookie mistakes - like that £50,00 engagement photo dress or the £500,000 baby shower?

by Anonymousreply 35104/25/2019

CAN WE PLEASE STAY ON TOPIC?

by Anonymousreply 35204/25/2019

R347, they forgot because they moved on to Meghan. They created this narrative about Meghan out of thin air based on absolutely nothing. So in order to down Meghan they had to bring up Kate. They create silly little mini scandals or go on about spending because they don't want to say why they really hate her. They all forgot Kate's mistakes and have forgotten how they trashed her. At least Kate is full on white.

I bet Kate doesn't care about the affair and I bet she won't take a lover.

by Anonymousreply 35304/25/2019

[quote] £50,00 engagement photo dress

Well, it certainly looked like a 50 quid dress.

by Anonymousreply 35404/25/2019

R353, all women are pissed. Especially if other people find out. It’s a public insult to her pride.

She’s worked very hard to create the image of the perfect wife and mother. She’s anorexic and strained looking. She’s already not living her best life. The one thing she had was her public image. And he ruined the “fairytale marriage” image by being indiscreet. If you must have an affair, find a woman who can keep quiet.

by Anonymousreply 35504/25/2019

LOL, actually if it had been a £50 dress and not a £50,000, it would have been a lot more successful.

I don't know, perhaps the British public always has to have someone to demonise or something to whinge about, but the Sussexes made everyone think, "Better the devil you know." Boring they may be, but the Cambridges do not rub people's noses in their lavish lifestyles. Very rarely is anyone offended by Kate's attire at any event, similar to Queen Letizia. They also do not lecture people on how to live, apart from Wills banging on about conservation a day before he goes on a hunting trip.

by Anonymousreply 35604/25/2019

You’re right R345, she does have close friends from Marlborough but they get ignored because people like the “Kate has no friends” narrative for some reason.

by Anonymousreply 35704/25/2019

William will keep on having discreet dalliances. He's gonna be king, so he's going to enjoy the perks, especially with frosty knickers at home.

Kate will grumble and moan in private. She'll devote herself to her family and do the bare minimum publicly.

Harry & Megs will do just fine.

by Anonymousreply 35804/25/2019

The anti Kate pro Meghan brigade is back.

by Anonymousreply 35904/25/2019

William isn't going to stop cheating and he won't be more discreet. It's 2019. Very hard to keep anything secret these days. I expect his cheating to get really bad when he hits mid life crisis age and the kids become teenagers.

by Anonymousreply 36004/25/2019

Abandon thread. Another one destroyed by bringing in MM at every motherfucking turn.

by Anonymousreply 36104/25/2019

Education moment - marquess is pronounced markwis - marchioness is pronounced marshoness.

by Anonymousreply 36204/25/2019

" I bet she won't take a lover. " Barbara Cartland's fancy bloomers has a leak.

by Anonymousreply 36304/25/2019

Aw, R283, the Bananatarian seems into the blowjob, bless her nonexistent heart.

by Anonymousreply 36404/25/2019

R357 Similarly Meghan has college friends but the racist brigade here prefers to believe Piers Morgan (!) that she has dumped every single person in her life that does not belong to Soho House.

by Anonymousreply 36504/25/2019

BlindGossip is getting drops from myriad sources about the whole debacle.

by Anonymousreply 36604/25/2019

Just dropped today

by Anonymousreply 36704/25/2019

A mere marchioness? No wonder everyone’s so frosty to him. God, that’s one step from banging the Polish housekeeper. Disgraceful.

Kate really needs to Cersei out, show England who’s the scariest bitch of them all. Wills will put it back in his pants. With that family, only the women have any damn sense.

by Anonymousreply 36804/25/2019

Bitch, please.

Blind Gossip is run by American Frauen.

by Anonymousreply 36904/25/2019

But you have to admit, “Baldy and Starchy” are pretty on the nose and hilarious.

by Anonymousreply 37004/25/2019

Aren't most Meg-stans American frauen? Seems counterintuitive to paint Meghan so poorly.

by Anonymousreply 37104/25/2019

White American women hate Meghan. They think she has risen above her station. Avocado-loving, LA Megs is not going to appeal to the white Frauen who voted for Trump, which is the clear majority of them.

by Anonymousreply 37204/25/2019

STAY ON TOPIC!

by Anonymousreply 37304/25/2019

And American Frauen of any political stripe love Kate.

They think with her shiny hair and gracious smile she is so classy and girly and tastefully European, just like Jackie O.

Jennifer Garner and Reese Witherspoon have raved about her.

by Anonymousreply 37404/25/2019

I think someone (ahem R372=R374) has gone off the deep end. Clueless moron.

by Anonymousreply 37504/25/2019

Kate is a (creepily quiet) disaster. They are ALL disasters. I want to say that Sophie isn't but fuck it, remember how she almost fucked it all up with her PR firm? Look how that bit got erased. Well done her, I guess.

by Anonymousreply 37604/25/2019

Actually, since Diana, the idea has been sold that being in the BRF is a horrible ordeal and none of them can stand it. That poor girl, marrying into such misery! Everyone should feel sorry for her! She must love him terribly because look how unhappy she’s going to be! Like she's Rapunzel.

Meanwhile, they’re just a bunch of people that don’t do anything requiring much thinking, and spend all their time gossiping, backstabbing, and imagining things to be up in arms about. All while living in a big house that's fancy on the outside and probably not all that comfortable inside.

by Anonymousreply 37704/25/2019

Kate is looking bitchier everyday. Her face is emotionless and is cold as ice. Nothing real about the caterer’s daughter Miss Middleton!

by Anonymousreply 37804/25/2019

Kate is gonna earn sainthood in this mess. Though I would love for Kate to show edges and be a Queen Bitch to them all.

by Anonymousreply 37904/25/2019

[quote]William will keep on having discreet dalliances. He's gonna be king, so he's going to enjoy the perks, especially with frosty knickers at home.

[quote] Kate will grumble and moan in private. She'll devote herself to her family and do the bare minimum publicly.

[quote] Harry & Megs will do just fine.

I love that post, especially the nickname, Frosty Knickers for Katey Waity.

by Anonymousreply 38004/25/2019

[quote]Is this Giles person really so important that his tweet confirming there was an affair, is what made KP shit their pants?

No, he’s a food writer. He certainly thinks he’s important, but nobody else does.

by Anonymousreply 38104/25/2019

Kate loses no matter what. No woman wants anyone to know she's married to a cheater, crown or no crown.

by Anonymousreply 38204/25/2019

Why is the assumption Kate is Frosty Knickers?? Just cause Wills can't keep it in his pants is no reflection on her!! She seems to pop out kids frequently, so...

by Anonymousreply 38304/25/2019

[quote] She seems to pop out kids frequently

Pfft.

by Anonymousreply 38404/25/2019

Get a grip. William and Kate will be king & queen. Harry & Meg, if they stay together, will be bald/fat and irrelevant, like Andrew and Sarah.

by Anonymousreply 38504/26/2019

Ok, I have a little gossip... not much, but my connection is sort of a six degrees of separation thing with someone close to William and Harry. People talk, and those people talk and before you know it, lots of people know stuff. There is a significant rift between William and Harry; the reason is indeed over MM. William was very wary of her, but he’s been openly antagonistic lately, and it was all after the NY baby shower. He’s not necessarily jealous that they get the attention—he’s even supportive of their proactive charity work—but he feels she’s not conforming to what he thinks a Royal should be (which is obviously more Kate-like). The other interesting thing is MM is liked by a lot of the family. She is very pleasant and fun to be around, and believe it or not, Harry loves her and she loves him. But the family are in line with William’s thinking, and are trying to help her conform more, which she’s willing to do.

This is the reason why she’s retreated for the birth.

William and Kate are still having troubles, but everyone is confident they’ll resolve them (remember, I only heard about the problems, I never heard directly about William’s cheating).

by Anonymousreply 38604/26/2019

Dear me. Not a Kate clone. One of her is enough.

by Anonymousreply 38704/26/2019

She's hardly conforming and retreating when she is putting out press pieces via Omid Scobie, even today.

by Anonymousreply 38804/26/2019

A marchioness is only one down from a duchess, so Rose has done alright for herself.

You'll probably find that most dukes are married as are their heirs, so bagging a marquis isn't too bad.

by Anonymousreply 38904/26/2019

R388, I seriously don’t think she’s leaking stories. If she were, she’d be banished for good, and Harry could do nothing to save her.

by Anonymousreply 39004/26/2019

Tart!

by Anonymousreply 39104/26/2019

R335 Giles Coren would basically shit himself on live TV for any form of attention whatsoever.

So take his "Oops, naughty me! I've now deleted my Royal Insider indiscretion! " act with a few very large bags of salt...

by Anonymousreply 39204/26/2019

William, self-appointed world's authority on grief, indirectly plays the Diana card during NZ speech as an earlier poster predicted as part of his "makeover".

by Anonymousreply 39304/26/2019

William is such an asshole

by Anonymousreply 39404/26/2019

Gary Janetti is going hard for the Cambridges today. Ouch

by Anonymousreply 39504/26/2019

R391 that face requires a spoiler warning. Oof.

by Anonymousreply 39604/26/2019

Why does Kate wear such dated clothes? My goodness. She might as well go back to pretending to grocery shopping. Yeah, whatever happened to grocery shopping Katey.

by Anonymousreply 39704/26/2019

This was Kate's platform.

by Anonymousreply 39804/26/2019

Rose ran into the same problem as Monica Lewinksy. What fun is fucking the future King if you can't brag about it?

by Anonymousreply 39904/27/2019

I don’t think there’s much fun in fucking William at all.

by Anonymousreply 40004/27/2019

Your child gets to become a prince. So some perks exist r400.

by Anonymousreply 40104/27/2019

That doesn’t sound that fun, and it’ll probably only happen to one person who’s done it. And if she has a girl it probably won’t even get to be a prince, what with the conservative climate at that level of society and all.

by Anonymousreply 40204/27/2019

I don't know what you are talking about. Children born out of wedlock don't get titles. If he knocked Rose up, he's even dumber than I thought.

by Anonymousreply 40304/27/2019

Can someone translate r402's post? into something comprensible.

by Anonymousreply 40404/27/2019

[quote]If he knocked Rose up, he's even dumber than I thought.

Well, there can be SOME benefits.....

RF

by Anonymousreply 40504/27/2019

R402 is a response to the notion that fucking William is worthwhile because “Your child gets to become a prince. So some perks exist.”

1) he’s probably not going to divorce Kate, so most people who have sex with him are probably not going to get to see their illegitimate children become princes

2) especially if the illegitimate child is a girl

3) illegitimate children do not get to be princes or princesses

4) why would being the mother of a prince be particularly interesting anyway, especially in comparison to say being a queen

by Anonymousreply 40604/27/2019

What happens to a child under those circumstances? Would they even be considered royal, as in, they are accepted into the society of their posh friends? Not sure what happened the last time a high ranking member of the royal family had a bastard shown in the light. I've seen Monaco's process, but their Prince is a cray-cray.

I think there would be a big to-do if a mistress came forward to request a title for their child. The palace would attempt a payoff, but the public woulf probably side with the bastard. I mean is William's seed any less royal if it goes into another woman? BP and conservatives would never bend to that pressure, but a media-savvy woman could really harm William's popularity with such a scandal.

The bastard rule should be tossed into the dustpan, like the male precedence rule they scrapped. It's 2019, if the child is from the heir, then he or she should receive the same rights as all the other children.

Just talking what-ifs.

by Anonymousreply 40704/28/2019

I give you the story of Henry FitzRoy, 1st Duke of Richmond and Somerset

by Anonymousreply 40804/28/2019

r408 a dukedom is great. See fucking William has it's benefits if they stick to Henry VIII's rules

by Anonymousreply 40904/28/2019

William is so pre-occupied that he doesn't know (more likely doesn't give a fuck) if Meghan's baby is due soon.

by Anonymousreply 41004/28/2019

Considering the fuss that is made every time his wife gets pregnant, and how supportive his brother has been and how fond he is of their children, that’s just classless.

“You’ve paid lots of attention to my kids and been supportive of my wife, fuck you and yours.” Petty as hell.

by Anonymousreply 41104/28/2019

What the heck is up with Will r410? I saw that article and thought it was so very odd since they have staff to keep them abreast of the situation. It feels like his way of say, I don't give a fuck about that woman and her future offspring.

Harry better hope Charles reigns for a at least a decade or more because William is a terror that shouldn't be leading the Royal family. He is lazy and has little compassion for his own family, hate to know what he thinks about the average citizen.

by Anonymousreply 41204/28/2019

He was answering as if he didn't know if she was in labor or not. I'm miffed with William right now but he said I don't have my phone. I don't know if something is imminent or not. He meant if she was in labor and birth was imminent. Geez. Now he could have added he was excited to meet his new niece or nephew. But he's not too smart.

by Anonymousreply 41304/28/2019

Considering there are rumors that he and his brother aren’t getting along, and that it’s over his poor attitude towards Meghan, he doesn’t have to prove the rumors are true.

He could simply say, “Any day now, you know how these things are!” and smile.

by Anonymousreply 41404/28/2019

did she sucky sucky like dis?

by Anonymousreply 41504/28/2019

I think it was when Harry was born, Princess Anne was asked something by a reporter about having a new nephew and her response was cold and dismissive leaving no doubt that she could not care less.

by Anonymousreply 41604/28/2019

[quote] He could simply say, “Any day now, you know how these things are!” and smile.

He could simply say, “Any day now, you know how these things are whether Harry is the baby's father or not!” and smile.

Fixed that for you.

by Anonymousreply 41704/28/2019

How could William possibly tell the world when the "private" birth information was not available to the public? This would be disrespectful to Harry.

by Anonymousreply 41804/28/2019

R417, come sit next to me.

by Anonymousreply 41904/28/2019

R409 That was a different time and a king without an heir. William has three heirs, not to mention a brother and cousins. Any bastard he has is completely irrelevant.

by Anonymousreply 42004/28/2019

R416 you don’t say...

by Anonymousreply 42104/29/2019

R410 He should have just said "the baby will come just as soon as the surrogate goes into labour"

by Anonymousreply 42204/29/2019

[R410] He should have just said "the baby will come just as soon as the surrogate goes into labour".... and is paid and shipped back to L.A.

TFIFY. Again.

by Anonymousreply 42304/29/2019

The thing I like best about Philip and Charles is their emthiasm for kilt drag when I’m Scotland. I imagine it goes back their education in Gordonstoun.

by Anonymousreply 42405/01/2019

Thick thighs

by Anonymousreply 42505/01/2019

Bump! Any more dirt floating around about this asshole?

by Anonymousreply 42605/01/2019

I always assumed it was MM who spilled the beans, but this guy thinks it was Rose herself for payback for being banished.

by Anonymousreply 42705/01/2019

The Sussexes have unfollowed William and Kate on Instagram!

... and they unfollowed everyone else too for Mental Health Awareness Month. They are following16 accounts related to mental health as a way to raise awareness in the month of May, which is actually quite a smart way to raise attention.

by Anonymousreply 42805/02/2019

[quote]The thing I like best about Philip and Charles is their emthiasm for kilt drag when I’m Scotland. I imagine it goes back their education in Gordonstoun.

It might have as much to do with reinforcing their images as the Royal Monarchs of Scotland. It wasn't always so and much blood was spelt over the issue.

by Anonymousreply 42905/02/2019

^ Sorry, I meant blood was spelled, not spelt.

by Anonymousreply 43005/02/2019

Not spelt. In Scotland, surely oats?

by Anonymousreply 43105/02/2019

Ice bitch Kate drove him have an affair!

by Anonymousreply 43205/03/2019

This story has gone completely silent.

by Anonymousreply 43305/22/2019

Kensington PR is too busy tipping off bloggers about fictional surrogate and photoshop scandals.

by Anonymousreply 43405/22/2019

Thread has re-opened... it’s a Christmas miracle!

by Anonymousreply 43506/12/2019

Random

by Anonymousreply 43606/13/2019

Wee Charles looks adorable at R424.

by Anonymousreply 437Last Sunday at 3:39 AM

What about DM and its new article about Rose and her husband shacking up with his male friend in Paris?

by Anonymousreply 438Last Monday at 2:46 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Don't you just LOVE clicking on these things on every single site you visit? I know we do! You can thank the EU parliament for making everyone in the world click on these pointless things while changing absolutely nothing. If you are interested you can take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT and we'll set a dreaded cookie to make it go away. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed


recent threads by topic delivered to your email

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!