[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
South Dakota woman is charged after police used DNA and genealogy sites
by Anonymous | reply 40 | April 6, 2019 2:38 AM |
Don’t do the crime if you don’t want to do time
by Anonymous | reply 1 | March 9, 2019 2:02 AM |
R1 = Old
by Anonymous | reply 2 | March 9, 2019 2:03 AM |
Good. Fuck her.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | March 9, 2019 2:05 AM |
Good work.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | March 9, 2019 2:08 AM |
by Anonymous | reply 5 | March 9, 2019 2:08 AM |
[quote] Careful with your DNA
Words to live by. Interpol has unsuccessfully been trying to get mine for 15 years.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | March 9, 2019 2:09 AM |
[quote] Careful with your DNA.
Now you tell me.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | March 9, 2019 2:09 AM |
These fools that PAY to give up their DNA!
“I just had to know if I was 1% African-Japanese-Guatemalan-Chinese -Spanish-Canadaian”
They could tell by tell by my cooking and by my resemblance to Miss Angie Dickinson! Yessss Hunty! The best money I ever spent!
by Anonymous | reply 8 | March 9, 2019 2:09 AM |
They got her through her relative’s DNA. Matched the baby with people in a data base related to her. If my DNA can be used to catch asshole relatives, I’m for it.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | March 9, 2019 2:13 AM |
I was going to state what r9 did. It’s the murderous relative who is getting found and arrested. It’s bizarre that some news stories try to make solving a crime and seeking justice this way seem sinister. This is a boon to society.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | March 9, 2019 2:19 AM |
Ugh, another Oscar for M
by Anonymous | reply 12 | March 9, 2019 2:21 AM |
But then they will search for Gay Gene (old friend) and find us all, out or not, and will be able to come to our homes and take us to camps and above and beyond.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | March 9, 2019 2:24 AM |
It makes me wonder if the percentage of women vs. men convicted of murder will slightly increase thanks to this database of ancestry DNA; since women are less apt to kill, many others may have slipped beneath the radar due to being “unlikely” suspects.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | March 9, 2019 2:25 AM |
Women are killers, esp where their spawn is concerned, you all included.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | March 9, 2019 2:29 AM |
I've done genealogy without the DNA test. My ancestors all came from Norway which has a lot of records available so i didn't need it. I don't trust any of the companies that offer DNA testing. I haven't committed a crime so I'm not worried about that, but I am concerned about insurance companies buying the data and using it. I'm not aware of any bad genetic component, but as I age, who knows.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | March 9, 2019 2:40 AM |
[quote]My ancestors all came from Norway which has a lot of records available so i didn't need it.
Conan O' Brien's all came from Ireland and the doctor said when you have no outside DNA, it's a sign of inbreeding.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | March 9, 2019 2:44 AM |
R14 it's already increasing due to allowing the crimes committed by males who identify as female to be attributed to women.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | March 9, 2019 2:44 AM |
R14, it's the opposite. There have already been dozens of cases solved with forensic genealogy and the killer is almost always a man.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | April 5, 2019 7:41 PM |
She looks like a Russian frau!
by Anonymous | reply 20 | April 5, 2019 8:02 PM |
R20 Why do these fugly old crones insist on getting that hideous bob? R13 How very Handmaid's Tale...creepy.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | April 5, 2019 8:28 PM |
[quote]Women are killers, esp where their spawn is concerned, you all included.
Sing it, sister!
by Anonymous | reply 22 | April 5, 2019 8:29 PM |
Has anyone heard what she has to say for herself? There is absolutely no excuse, but just curious. Why the fuck didn't she just drop the infant off at a Fire Station?
by Anonymous | reply 23 | April 5, 2019 8:29 PM |
What r1 said. Its good that advances in technology are letting murderers get caught.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | April 5, 2019 8:37 PM |
R3 Yes! Fuck her! Fuck her in the pussy!
by Anonymous | reply 25 | April 5, 2019 8:37 PM |
Careful with throwing your newborn infant in a ditch is more like it, OP.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | April 5, 2019 8:48 PM |
r23 I believe in '81 it was still illegal to just drop your baby off anywhere.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | April 5, 2019 8:57 PM |
Yes, but illegal is a far cry from murder.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | April 5, 2019 8:59 PM |
but at the time I'm sure one didn't seem any different than the other to the mother.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | April 5, 2019 9:00 PM |
This is such a horrible story.
In the blanket, he found a baby — with tears frozen on his cheeks.
By the time Litz found him, the baby had been lying in the ditch for roughly 24 hours, the coroner would soon rule. The boy lived for about two hours before freezing and bleeding to death, the coroner found. His umbilical cord had not been cut. The placenta was still attached. The blanket was covered in blood.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | April 5, 2019 9:02 PM |
Women being 'less apt to kill' is a massive understatement R14. Statistics show that murders and other violent crime is overwhelmingly carried out by men/males. And before anyone points me to particular examples, remember that I didn't say 'all'/
by Anonymous | reply 31 | April 5, 2019 9:07 PM |
Trump supporter.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | April 5, 2019 9:12 PM |
I was 19 when I had my first child. Her excuse that she was "young and stupid" doesn't do it. I wish they would give her the death penalty.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | April 5, 2019 9:12 PM |
[quote][R23]I believe in '81 it was still illegal to just drop your baby off anywhere.
[quote]Yes, but illegal is a far cry from murder.
Would dropping off grandma - suffering from advanced dementia - in the woods also be “a far cry from murder?” I’m not sure if you’re challenging the definition of “homocide” or the definition of “human.”
by Anonymous | reply 34 | April 5, 2019 9:18 PM |
[quote]homocide
Oh, dear!
by Anonymous | reply 35 | April 5, 2019 9:21 PM |
Oops - Freudian slip there, R35. My bad.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | April 5, 2019 9:26 PM |
You completely missed the point R34. Dropping grandma off in the woods would most likely ALSO be murder. My point was why the fuck didn't this bitch take the baby to a fire station, where it would be found and safe, rather than throwing her own helpless newborn in a fucking ditch? Saying "Illegal is a far cry from murder was addressing R27's completely idiotic comment. As if the mother had some sort of dialogue with herself deciding which to do, since they are both "illegal".
by Anonymous | reply 37 | April 5, 2019 9:29 PM |
R33, I wish Republicans who support the death penalty would be shipped to Iran. Lord knows the country would be better off without you. Why are redneck teen moms posting on a gay site?
by Anonymous | reply 38 | April 5, 2019 10:24 PM |
Exactly, r16.
You just know those greedy insurance fucks would live nothing more than to get their hands on that info to deny you insurance and treatment.
And the goddamned rethugs would be all for it. As long as those goddam greedy pricks got their cut of the kickback.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | April 5, 2019 10:42 PM |
yiyuiyui
by Anonymous | reply 40 | April 6, 2019 2:38 AM |