Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Bryan Singer's Collapse is Complete --Atlantic article Part 3

Continued from last thread. "The Atlantic's Bryan Singer Article Part 2"

by Anonymousreply 39703/16/2019

Is he in jail, yet?

by Anonymousreply 101/28/2019

It is kind of like the McCarthy era.

by Anonymousreply 201/28/2019

If only someone would expose the wannabe Bryan Singer in New Zealand…

by Anonymousreply 301/28/2019

But only with raping people instead of having political views.

by Anonymousreply 401/28/2019

Has he killed himself yet?

by Anonymousreply 501/28/2019

Who is that R3? You mean Peter Jackson?

by Anonymousreply 601/28/2019

Depressing shit.

by Anonymousreply 701/28/2019

Is she dead yet? Her career certainly is. And don’t give me that Red Sonja shit. It’s never going to happen. And that producer just ended his movie career as well.

by Anonymousreply 801/28/2019

[Quote] And don’t give me that Red Sonja shit. It’s never going to happen.

You seem really sure about that.

by Anonymousreply 901/28/2019

Has the X-Men released a statement yet? Rebecca Romijn? Halle Berry? Patrick Stewart? Hugh Jackman? Ian McKellen?

by Anonymousreply 1001/28/2019

I am, R9. He doesn’t have a contract.

by Anonymousreply 1101/28/2019

Ian McKellen insists he never went to Singer's parties and Singer is a very intense guy.

by Anonymousreply 1201/28/2019

Last comment in Part 2, probably not widely read:

Not even 1/4 of the celebrities who were vocal about Harvey said something about Singer. The reason being that Bryan has connections to powerful people and the police. It's not a right-wing conspiracy that there are pedo rings dating back to the 70s linked to Hollywood. There are also 2 major directors everyone in town knows abuse children. One is an icon who probably won't fall ever. He was ditching comments on Singer last week.

Singer's inclinations go beyond the despicable actions mentioned at [R492]. Both Singer and Spacey have been linked to pedo havens like the famous Island of the Lolita Express and the Philippines. It is NO COINCIDENCE Marc Collins-Rector, Chad Shackley and Brock Pierce were all involved in that Interpol raid in Spain where they found thousands of child pornography material.

It's absurd Brock Pierce is still free as an Internet personality which tells you all you need to know about the silence in Hollywood on Singer. It's not a causality that Colins-Rector is living in a pedo paradise that is Antwerp in Belgium.

by Anonymousreply 1301/28/2019

I posted this in another part 3 but for those who haven't seen it... I went to the X men premiere just after Singer was first in hot water. McKellen, Stewart, etc were all there and during the introduction Stewart gave an impassioned speech defending Singer. He hasn't said much since. Singer was absent as he had just been accused of rape. they ( the cast ) all took turns on the mic for celeb guff and promotional bollocks, Patrick Stewart def set his boundaries,it was along the lines of 'one of us is missing today and he's a creative whizz and being unfairly persecuted' It was in London a few years ago pre #MeeToo and Singers' reputation sinking, so I guess it wasn't picked up on.

by Anonymousreply 1401/28/2019

That is surprising about Stewart, r14. Why was he so invested in defending Singer in public like that?

by Anonymousreply 1501/28/2019

It was pre the current #MeToo mood R15 and there probably wasn't as much smoke around Singer at that time. I expect Stewart heard the rumors. as we all have, but probably felt more indignation at his colleague and one of the inner fame circle being 'persecuted', I doubt anyone would want to defend Singer now.

by Anonymousreply 1601/28/2019

It's amazing how much celebrities will defend each other even in the face of horrific accusations. They really do live in a bubble of privilege.

If I was a celebrity and a close friend of mine was accused of pedophilia, I might not openly condemn him, but I certainly wouldn't publicly support him either.

by Anonymousreply 1701/28/2019

R14 Singer was not publicly accused of rape until 2014 so if this happened at an X-men premiere after that there’d surely be video. Is there?

by Anonymousreply 1801/28/2019

I can't remember now but I remember reading a post many, many years ago on DL, a poster commented on a director on friendly terms with a few guys accused of child porn. I think it was tim B, if my memory serves...can't be sure.

by Anonymousreply 1901/28/2019

In Hollywood some even don't step out of line when their own kids get abused by higher ups (hell, like crazy stage moms they believe that it will be better for their own social standing in Hollywood). A great deal of actors don't give a fuck about what heinous crimes others commit as long it doesn't hurt their own social and financial standing in Hollywood. They all agreed to live in a bubble where shit happens behind closed doors and nobody better talks about it to outsiders. Once upon a time (and still to this day!) gay shit was part of that stuff Hollywood insiders didn't share with outsiders (like the press).

by Anonymousreply 2001/28/2019

Singer was involved in the death of a young kid while attending a huge orgy back in the ‘90s. This kid was drugged and molested so severely that the abuse didn’t stop until they realised he was no longer breathing. And the last thing on their minds was to try and ring an ambulance, what they did instead was to make some calls and have the body dumped for the cops to find.

However, nothing was ever traced back to Singer and his pals.

by Anonymousreply 2101/28/2019

SInger is still acting like the victim here and I dont think in his own mind he thinks he has done anything wrong simply because he is or was a very powerful force in Hollywood. And to people in the entertainment business that is more secure and above it all........... than any other occupation or social strata in america. He is still on for Red Sonja and millenium films seems just as certain SInger is on board and should be involved as Singer himself is. Millenium has no equivication here.

Generally I found datalounge commentors overly supportive of Singer as well as Spacey etc,,,,,,,,,,I really think many posters on this site dont know the difference between consensual sex and non consensual and being significantly under age has no bearing to this group.

by Anonymousreply 2201/28/2019

Its not so much privledge as it is being famous. They defend one another because they know how simple it is for rumors to ruin a career...especially in this day and age. Something that may not be true at all can blow up into an inquisition....and youre done. You do see them turning when actual evidence comes out though.

by Anonymousreply 2301/28/2019

[quote]Generally I found datalounge commentors overly supportive of Singer as well as Spacey etc

You realize this is two shills posting day and night, right?

by Anonymousreply 2401/28/2019

Oh Lord....

by Anonymousreply 2501/28/2019

SInger probably fucked him too, right?

by Anonymousreply 2601/28/2019

Sir Ian claiming to have only had a professional, not social relationship with Singer seems a bit suspect, given the photos out there. Anyone have personal knowledge?

by Anonymousreply 2701/28/2019

Dylan's only defending them because he enjoys their money and all the underage twinks he gets to bang alongside them. Maybe a future Singer in the making.

by Anonymousreply 2801/28/2019

[quote]I really think many posters on this site dont know the difference between consensual sex and non consensual and being significantly under age has no bearing to this group.

I suspect that a significant number of DL's posters have been on the underage side of these kind of situations in their lives, and have convinced themselves that it was no big deal, that they were undamaged by it, so what are these guys complaining about? But that lack of empathy and victim-blaming is a giant red flag that a shitload of damage WAS done. It's not just this discussion of Singer, it's the Spacey discussions and other things going back years.

by Anonymousreply 2901/28/2019

Michael Jackson too...

by Anonymousreply 3001/28/2019

R27 I’ve only ever seen them in one candid photo (not something from a professional event) together. Are there more?

by Anonymousreply 3101/29/2019

There have always been plenty of rumors about Ian himself, no?

by Anonymousreply 3201/29/2019

What are they? Harassment? Underage stuff? Or just that he is kind of a dog? Those details matter.

by Anonymousreply 3301/29/2019

No R32, his interests are well within legality, I think any side-eye at him is genuinely due to the homophobia Singer/Spacey are trying to claim .

by Anonymousreply 3401/29/2019

This thread has become seriously deranged. There's a bunch of silly Qanon CDAN and 4chan rumours and conspiracy theories being touted as facts. No need for a cabal of powerful pedophiles murdering and raping their way through hollyweird. It's just the usual mundane sex, drugs and exploitation.

by Anonymousreply 3501/29/2019

[quote]I can't remember now but I remember reading a post many, many years ago on DL, a poster commented on a director on friendly terms with a few guys accused of child porn. I think it was tim B, if my memory serves...can't be sure.

Jeffrey Jones, an actor in several of Burton’s movies (namely Beetlejuice) was busted for cp and photographing a 14 yo boy. A tip in his case led to a search of Paul Reubens (Pee Wee Herman) House where they found his “vintage erotica” porn collection, though the cp possession charges against Reubens were eventually dropped. Reubens was another frequent Burton actor.

by Anonymousreply 3601/29/2019

DM has a piece on sex assault settlements by Singer

by Anonymousreply 3701/29/2019

The individuals investing in D.E.N. is a telling list, the corporations still trip me out

by Anonymousreply 3801/29/2019

Bryan Singer is totally creepy. Did ya’ll realise Peter Thiels home is literally 100 meters away from his?

by Anonymousreply 3901/29/2019

Bryan should just move to France, where the age of consent is much younger and the boys have huge, uncut cocks.

by Anonymousreply 4001/29/2019

BUMP

by Anonymousreply 4101/30/2019

"THR reached out to a wide swath of representatives, producers and talent to gauge if Millennium would suffer any consequences for keeping Singer in the Red Sonja fold. No one wanted to be quoted. But even with the veil of anonymity, no one said he or she would stop working with Lerner. A few agents and managers said they would balk at putting a client in Red Sonja. "The fact that he’s making a movie so quickly after the allegations became public feels wrong," says a founder at a top management company. "If a manager [here] came to me and told me they were doing it, I’d have a problem."

That quote says it all. Hollywood is willing to sweep this under the rug like all the other times, and is just waiting until it all blows over (no doubt hoping Trump will provide a distraction, as he always does). This is despite an intensity of accusations against Singer that rivals Weinstein's and Cosby's. Might as well start calling Singer "Teflon Don." Times Up is an utter joke.

by Anonymousreply 4201/30/2019

Antwerp in Belgium is a pedo paradise? With that xenophobic freak as a mayor? Well colour me surprised.

by Anonymousreply 4301/30/2019

Vanity Fair------Bryan Singer’s Biggest Hollywood Supporter Isn’t Backing Down------Avi Lerner, head of Millennium Films, is clarifying his support of the embattled director, but isn’t retracting his remarks: “I don’t want to apologize.”"

by Anonymousreply 4401/30/2019

"In January 2019, Bryan Singer was accused of sexually assaulting and sleeping with a string of under-age boys"----------Ben Whishaw was supposed to play Freddie.........

by Anonymousreply 4501/30/2019

"Accused Rapist Bryan Singer Could Make Over $40M for 'Bohemian Rhapsody'-----In light of the allegations against him, the prospect of the hefty paycheck is frustrating many in Hollywood."

by Anonymousreply 4601/30/2019

Closeted Rami Malek shows off Fake Girlfriend.......

by Anonymousreply 4701/30/2019

And that imitator will get an oscar? :P

by Anonymousreply 4801/30/2019

R47 I remember Rami went on the Nerdist podcast when Mr. Robot was big, and he was asked if he would ever date other actors. He said he had in the past, and it was fun for a minute, but all in all he’s not drawn to acting types. So I find that him dating Portia and now Lucy is hilarious.

Anyway, f*** Singer and the people cutting him a paycheck.

by Anonymousreply 4901/30/2019

Rami is clearly in the closet and that’s part of why he won’t speak against Singer.

by Anonymousreply 5001/31/2019

[QUOTE]THR noted that Singer likely negotiated a “strong backend provision” in his deal to direct Bohemian Rhapsody, which is where the possible $40 million windfall comes into play. It’s earned a "fat-bottomed $817 million worldwide to date,” according to THR, which potentially entitles Singer to a lot more dough than expected.

All those people who had to watch that movie, some making multiple trips to the cineplex, are about to make Singer a much richer man. And unlike Spacey he doesn’t even have to spend any of that on settlements and lawyer fees since nothing sticks to him legally.

by Anonymousreply 5101/31/2019

The owner of THR is friends with David Geffen , just saying.. .

by Anonymousreply 5201/31/2019

R50 Rami is clearly in the closet and that’s part of why he won’t speak against Singer.

Some of the actresses who spoke against Harvey are closeted

by Anonymousreply 5301/31/2019

[quote]Rami is clearly in the closet and that’s part of why he won’t speak against Singer.

No. What would that have to do with anything? He isn't allowed to, as per contract. He admitted that accidentally.

by Anonymousreply 5401/31/2019

Actor Isaac Kappy Accuses Director Steven Spielberg, Others of Pedophilia In Rambling Video,

by Anonymousreply 5501/31/2019

Crispin Glover: Steven Spielberg Is A Pedophile

by Anonymousreply 5601/31/2019

Steven Spielberg A Pedophile, 2nd Hollywood Actress Backs Up Isaac Kappy Claims

by Anonymousreply 5701/31/2019

Hahaha. It's great when the pizza gate wackos start to trip themselves up. Bryan Singer may have done some wrong things, but to accuse Spielberg of killing Heather O'Rorake is such horseshit. Fucking wacko Trump supporting pieces of shit.

by Anonymousreply 5801/31/2019

Why on EARTH would you post this as a credible person?

"Isaac Kappy claimed Seth Greene has a child rape room in his home, hidden behind a bookshelf. That Seth Greene personally INVITED Issac to join the NEXT LEVEL of the CLUB. All Issac had to do was rape kids. In return Isaac would get $250,000 a year and any car he wanted."

by Anonymousreply 5901/31/2019

Yeah the Trumpsters are here. Shame.

by Anonymousreply 6001/31/2019

Yeah. Even An Open Secret thinks Isaac Kappy and QAnon are stupid and you all know how they operate.

by Anonymousreply 6101/31/2019

For a moment I though the Spielberg pedophilia scandal was really breaking.

If it ever does, people will again claim that "everyone knew".

by Anonymousreply 6201/31/2019

[quote]If it ever does, people will again claim that "everyone knew".

I won't.

by Anonymousreply 6301/31/2019

Why do you all keep bringing up Rami here? This is about Singer. If you wanna spread your Rami bullshit and post pics and vids of him and Lucy there are Rami threads you can put that on. He has his own threads, stop filling the Singer thread with him.

by Anonymousreply 6401/31/2019

There are gonna be a lot of disappointed losers on here when Rami wins his Oscar. Many of them PR people for his competitors.

by Anonymousreply 6501/31/2019

Fanfraus have heavily infested these threads.

by Anonymousreply 6601/31/2019

I wish that we could get the facts on who is protecting Singer without it spiraling into a vast Pizzagate conspiracy that involves every actor over the age of 30 in any of his movies being a pedophile & every actor under 30 being a former victim.

Someone is protecting him — probably an important businessman or businessmen. But we can’t get to the truth because people keep accusing every random person in the world without evidence.

by Anonymousreply 6701/31/2019

Protecting him how? He's been the subject of articles and accusations for years. If he's being protected, they're not doing a very good job of it. The fact Singer still hasn't been arrested or convicted of anything seems to be because the police can't find anything to charge him with.

by Anonymousreply 6801/31/2019

The article came out over a year late. He was protected by the Hearsts, according to the writer.

by Anonymousreply 6901/31/2019

The writer for the Washington Examiner article, you mean? That's a terrible article, though. She asks who is protecting him, not IF he is being protected and then spends the article avoiding any mention of any factual basis for that conclusion. "Maybe someone is protecting him? Maybe Disney is protecting him? Maybe Hollywood will never see an innocent sunset...?" etc. It's empty speculative garbage.

by Anonymousreply 7001/31/2019

Agreed, it's blabla.

by Anonymousreply 7101/31/2019

R68 —> see R69

Who at Hearst killed the story? Why couldn’t Fox get his name off Bohemian Rhapsody? Why hasn’t the DGA kicked him out? Why are most celebs unwilling to speak about the article now? Again, he’s being protected.

by Anonymousreply 7201/31/2019

[quote]Who at Hearst killed the story?

We don't know if they "killed" the story or rejected it for valid reasons.

[quote]Why hasn’t the DGA kicked him out?

Because he hasn't been charged, let alone convicted, of anything, probably.

[quote]Why are most celebs unwilling to speak about the article now?

Maybe they don't have anything to say. Which isn't the same as unwillingness to speak. Maybe they're too busy instagramming their nostrils.

[quote]Again, he’s being protected

Well, whoever you think is protecting him, they're not doing a very good job of it....

by Anonymousreply 7301/31/2019

R73 you obviously haven’t actually read anything about this situation so I’ll stop debating with you here. The authors of the article confirmed in a public statement that Esquire accepted the article, it was fact checked, went through legal review & was ready to run. Hearst execs then killed it & they don’t know why. That’s when they took it to the Atlantic.

by Anonymousreply 7401/31/2019

I hope Rami and Lady Gaga both lose. And I hope Meryl never wins a 4th Academy Award either.

They're no better than politicians who declare war on drugs despite the fact that organized crime and drug cartels line their pockets.

by Anonymousreply 7501/31/2019

Hollywood Reporter------>"New Bryan Singer Claims Complicate 'Bohemian Rhapsody' Oscar Hopes.............Hollywood has long been aware that Singer has a dubious reputation, but, coming a day after the Oscar nominations, the 10,000-word Atlantic piece injects his alleged predatory behavior into the discussion in a way that's hard to ignore.----------Golden Globe winner Malek (who's in a tight race with a fellow Globe winner in Vice's Christian Bale, as well as A Star Is Born's Bradley Cooper) has said he was unaware of allegations involving Singer before he signed on, and broad knowledge of Malek's on-set tussles with the filmmaker should inoculate him from damage; his Jan. 27 victory at the SAG Awards would seem to indicate that. Still, the newsworthiness of the Atlantic story will impede his ability to conduct interviews without addressing the topic......."

by Anonymousreply 7601/31/2019

Protector - Diller?

by Anonymousreply 7701/31/2019

He hasn’t been charged or convicted. That’s why he hasn’t been dropped by DGA.

Rami Malek just said in an interview recently he signed on before Singer. So this article already lost credibility. This interview was a week ago. Can’t remember which specific one. And why Singers actions can hurt Malek just shows what’s wrong with today’s mentality. The hundreds of people that worked on a film should be fucked over for one person? Malek should not win cause the Director he had no say in choosing is a pervert? Like come on already. This shit is getting out of hand.

by Anonymousreply 7801/31/2019

R78 = You have to remember we are talking about an alleged child rapist----you can't claim you thought he was 18 after hooking up with a 13 year old...Punishing ALL those who chose to work with Bryan Singer sends a broader long term message that YOU will also pay a price for YOUR choice. That is why I think Rami Malek should NOT win.. Plus Rami is a one hit wonder and looks like a mutant---so his Oscar would be a waste...

by Anonymousreply 7901/31/2019

BREAKING = 21st Century Fox looking for ways to NOT pay Bryan Singer------->"'Bohemian Rhapsody' studio reportedly hoping to avoid paying Bryan Singer.......21st Century Fox, which co-financed and released the movie, is exploring its legal options to determine its real financial obligations to Singer. This is likely in the hopes of not paying the estimated $40 million he may be due thanks to the retention of his director’s credit......."

by Anonymousreply 8001/31/2019

The Guardian Throws down on Bryan Singer and tosses Michael Jackson and R.Kelly into the mix-----"R Kelly, Michael Jackson and Bryan Singer. Who knew? Everyone.........Beset by allegations of predatory and abusive behaviour – including rape – the film director retains support in the film industry while he continues to bring in the money....As, indeed, it is alleged to have gone on with Singer, who has long been tailed by sexual assault allegations. He denies all the Atlantic’s revelations. Before he denied these, he had a couple of decades of denying other ones."

by Anonymousreply 8101/31/2019

Every single time a poster here tries to discuss other potential predators in Hollywood, someone jumps in with a post about how they’re some q-anon conspiracy theorist. The nature of the entertainment industry, in which a very few individuals are successful and powerful, lends itself to abuse and manipulation of the vulnerable. It’s not a conspiracy to say that there are clearly plenty of abusers and they’re protected by the insular, money worshipping nature of Hollywood.

by Anonymousreply 8201/31/2019

[quote]It’s not a conspiracy to say that there are clearly plenty of abusers and they’re protected by the insular, money worshipping nature of Hollywood.

But that doesn't amount to a paedophile ring. Which is where the QAnon/Pizzagate morons immediately go.

by Anonymousreply 8301/31/2019

Exactly R83 There are people who claim that every single child actor in Hollywood has been abused. And some people have linked to some Q shit.

by Anonymousreply 8402/01/2019

Singer does not have to be charged or convicted with a crime to be kicked out of the DGA; the producer’s guild kicked Weinstein out long before he was charged. They get to choose their membership and do not even have to have a reason. Their lack of action on Singer is therefore very suspicious.

by Anonymousreply 8502/01/2019

Pedo rings do exist however

by Anonymousreply 8602/01/2019

"As Bryan Singer’s Underage Sexual Assault Allegations Continue More People Vow To Boycott ‘Red Sonja’'...

by Anonymousreply 8702/01/2019

Odd----Both IMDB and WIKI have REMOVED Bryan Singers name as Producer from the next X-Men movie----Dark Phoenix.....

by Anonymousreply 8802/01/2019

Rami Malek distances himself from Bryan Singer = " "For anyone who is seeking any solace in all of this, Bryan Singer was fired. Bryan Singer was fired, I don't think that was something anyone saw coming but I think that had to happen and it did."

by Anonymousreply 8902/01/2019

Interesting, r88! Real consequences! Red Sonja will not be made with him, either.

by Anonymousreply 9002/02/2019

If they fight to not pay him the 40 Mill then it's open season on Singer either way. If he gets the money Hollywood will resent him for winning against them if he loses that means nobody gives a fuck about him anymore.

by Anonymousreply 9102/02/2019

[Quote] A+ List Predators: There has been a lot of talk, rightfully so, about Bryan Singer ("The Atlantic" Bryan Singer article) and his raping of teen boys. I think we would be remiss if we choose to sweep under the rug two other rapists just because we put them on a pedestal. One of these rapists is A+ list. Mostly movie actor. Do we ever talk about how when he was in his mid twenties he was raping a 15 year old on a daily basis? We just think the Oscar winner/nominee is just this wonderful guy and ignore his past because then it would make us confront what we are willing to deem acceptable. Even worse is this former A list mostly movie actor who was the star of one of the biggest movie franchises that has existed. It continues to this day, even without him. Should we ignore him raping a 16 year old teen on an almost daily basis when he was nearing 30? Oh, how about when he was in his early 30's and started raping a different 16 year old. Just because they stayed together until after she was legal doesn't make it any more right. Do we call him out on it? No. Do we call the A+ lister out on his behavior? No. Why? What makes us willing to give them a pass? What makes us willing to say it is different. Are we going to make excuses or is everyone going to be held to the same standard?

I'm wondering if Bryan wrote this blind for CDAN.

by Anonymousreply 9202/02/2019

Can't he just go to France and join Polanski and make movies from there?

by Anonymousreply 9302/02/2019

Guesses as to the others in the blind at R92?

by Anonymousreply 9402/02/2019

Hollywood is FILLED WITH Pedophiles. This hasn’t been a thing for YEARS.

It’s the perfect place for a pedophile. They have access to tons of youth, many good looking, and have money to keep things as hush and in control as they want.

by Anonymousreply 9502/02/2019

R94 one of them is Paul Walker. Though i'm not sure what they want to be done?? Dude is dead.

by Anonymousreply 9602/02/2019

R96 yup. He liked them young.

My friend always brought up how she loved Walker but couldn’t look at him the same cause he always got with underage teens and no one would call him on it.

She feels that way about Cavill also.

by Anonymousreply 9702/02/2019

[Quote] She feels that way about Cavill also.

Well good thing she avoids his threads on here.

by Anonymousreply 9802/02/2019

R65 Many of them PR people for his competitors.

from Cooper's team obviously none of the other nominees are as thirsty and shameless as Cooper

by Anonymousreply 9902/02/2019

Walker was gay like Pitt and many other closet cowards he bearded/married a teenager.

by Anonymousreply 10002/02/2019

R100 lol since when??

by Anonymousreply 10102/02/2019

FUCK that BI for writing "raping" for "being in a relationship with", as if Singer was only accused of starting a relationship with a boyfriend while he was still underaged. Singer is accused of rape-rape, molestation and abuse, you fucks.

And r100, get help for your delusions.

by Anonymousreply 10202/02/2019

Paul Walker was most definitely a heterosexual man.

by Anonymousreply 10302/02/2019

Not that I want to come off like a douche, but why is Paul Walker considered heterosexual for going after underage girls and Singer is a pedophile for going after underage boys? To me going after underage teens makes them creeps to me.

by Anonymousreply 10402/02/2019

Obviously Singer is a homo... Pedophile is not the right word for him. If it is to be considered then for molesting 13 year olds, which he is accused of! Definitely not for creeping after 16yo's. He also is an abusive rapist, allegedly.

by Anonymousreply 10502/02/2019

R102 get help for your delusions.

get help for you thirst for straight cock :wink:

by Anonymousreply 10602/02/2019

Not here for playing word games about all the different flavors of pedo. There are minors and adults. Adults more than a few years older than minors having sex with jail bait is wrong, not part of healthy gay behavior and illegal in most instances.

by Anonymousreply 10702/02/2019

#1 - Cavill is gay! He isn't out chasing little girls.

#2 - Even if he weren't gay, he has dated exactly one person under 20 and she was an old looking 19.

by Anonymousreply 10802/02/2019

He’s not gay. He fucks women and men.

by Anonymousreply 10902/02/2019

He fucks men and gets papped with women.

by Anonymousreply 11002/02/2019

Nope. He fucks women too

by Anonymousreply 11102/02/2019

Cavill is a bottom.

by Anonymousreply 11202/02/2019

Cavill is gay. LOL at the fangurls trying to make him Bisexual. Girl please! Cavill is a cocksucker.

by Anonymousreply 11302/02/2019

And a pussy eater...

by Anonymousreply 11402/02/2019

Did he eat your pussy, R114? Pics or it did not happen.

by Anonymousreply 11502/02/2019

He ate many pussies

by Anonymousreply 11602/02/2019

He has never eaten a cat in his life.

by Anonymousreply 11702/02/2019

Baby, he’s eaten PLENTY

by Anonymousreply 11802/02/2019

Is PLENTY pre-op trans ?....cause he only goes for cock.

by Anonymousreply 11902/02/2019

Stream An Open Secret, free on Vimeo. It is no surprise that the film could not get a distributor.

by Anonymousreply 12002/02/2019

More on The Apt Pupil

by Anonymousreply 12102/02/2019

.......

by Anonymousreply 12202/02/2019

Singer's not even a good filmmaker. At least Polanski and Woody Allen produced great art while being vile fuck ups.

by Anonymousreply 12302/03/2019

[quote]Fanfraus have heavily infested these threads.

That cry is tired, Captain Save-A-Perv.

by Anonymousreply 12402/03/2019

I don't give a fuck what that producer says, I just can't imagine the "Red Sonja" project getting off the ground. I just can't see any reputable actor or actress going anywhere near this thing nor can I see any upstarts who want to have a career beyond one film going near it either. It's total kryptonite and will be going into the canceled column any day now.

by Anonymousreply 12502/03/2019

Well, they are going to make it, but without Singer. His collapse truly is complete.

by Anonymousreply 12602/03/2019

The article being delayed until the day after the Oscar noms and the MJ docu suddenly dropping (a distraction as members are casting their votes) can't be coincidences. Somebody with major clout is behind those moves.

by Anonymousreply 12702/03/2019

You mean in favor of Bohemian Rhapsody? Why not delay the article until after the Oscars then? It's not exactly convenient right now.

by Anonymousreply 12802/03/2019

Does not seem like it would work in favor of BR?

by Anonymousreply 12902/03/2019

Ignore the conspiracy troll...

by Anonymousreply 13002/03/2019

[Quote] Mr. X: What former superhero franchise star's PR people sent an order not to ask him any questions about his frequent collaborator, that disgraced director, at an event a few nights ago? Inside the party, he was overheard talking about how he has tried to contact the disgraced director but he hasn't been successful. Whenever he calls both his home and cell phone, no one answers. Hugh Jackman ("2019 American Australian Arts Awards")/Bryan Singer ("The Atlantic" Bryan Singer article)

[Quote] Mr. X: Speaking of the disgraced director, I've heard rumors that there are more victims that are going to be coming forward in the next month or so. Bryan Singer ("The Atlantic" Bryan Singer article)

[Quote] Apparently all of the attention headed his way has not stopped the disgraced director from using his errand boy actor who starred on his last film to round up young men and bring them to the director for parties. He was at it at a West Hollywood club Friday night. Apparently the alliterate actor/singer who used to do that kind of thing is trying to pretend he doesn't even know the director, which will be seen as a sign of betrayal by the mogul. So, look for bad things to happen to the alliterate one. Bryan Singer/Ben Hardy or Rami Malek ("Bohemian Rhapsody")/Matthew Morrison ("The Atlantic" Bryan Singer article)

And they just keep on coming.

by Anonymousreply 13102/04/2019

That last one sounds ridiculous. Especially picturing Rami Malek. Hahaha. "God I hate that fucker, but someone has to bring him boys to party, so whatever!"

by Anonymousreply 13202/04/2019

Since when is Rami Malek an actor/singer?

by Anonymousreply 13302/04/2019

No, Matthew Morrison is the actor/singer who supposedly wants to distance himself from Singer. While Rami Malek and/or Ben Hardy can't get enough of him for some extremely plausible reason. (It's BI lingo you have to read it three times and squint for it to make a lick of sense)

by Anonymousreply 13402/04/2019

Singer needs to somehow line up this judge for his inevitable trial:

Kansas judge calls children the ‘aggressor’ in sex abuse case with 67-year-old man.

by Anonymousreply 13502/04/2019

FX cancels Legion---No mention of Bryan Singer but he is a producer on the show.....One less paycheck for Singer......

by Anonymousreply 13602/04/2019

They could have just fired Singer without canceling the show.

And I said already Matthew Morrison is one of the people who would frequent Singers parties and brought young guys for Singer but no one believed me.

He also got Mark Salling into the child porn.

by Anonymousreply 13702/04/2019

I barely know Matthew Morrison, but I thought there were a lot of pictures of him and Singer and that's why people gossiped?

Could these blind items or specifically the third one come from Singer himself? It threatens Morrison (presumably) for being disloyal to him and attacks Ben Hardy or Rami Malek (presumably), both of whom have publicly dissed him recently.

by Anonymousreply 13802/04/2019

Rami has NOTHING to do with this BI.

by Anonymousreply 13902/04/2019

I do think it's possible that Bryan Singer will come up with a way to fuck up Ramis Oscar----a public tweet from Bryan Singer thanking Rami for his support, etc----maybe Rami and Singer can be the next "Feud"..._

by Anonymousreply 14002/04/2019

Singer needs to stop. Rami isn’t ALLOWED to discuss Singer. Why antagonize and bother him? Leave him be.

by Anonymousreply 14102/04/2019

Well, Rami DID say something, the whole "very unpleasant" thing plus the victims deserve to be heard. I can see Singer being livid. At that uppity twink Ben Hardy too.

by Anonymousreply 14202/04/2019

Hahaha more toward Hardy cause he’s the one giving Hardy roles. He didn’t cast Malek. He cast Hardy. Twice.

by Anonymousreply 14302/04/2019

There can only be one reason that a two bit soap actor can be put in Hollywood films, and it's not for his acting for sure.

by Anonymousreply 14402/04/2019

Oh everyone knows what Hardy did to get cast in X-Men, then BR

by Anonymousreply 14502/04/2019

At some point----we are going to have to address the fact that some people with freaky fetishes like to film their perversions....

by Anonymousreply 14602/04/2019

What is going on with Rami's eyes. Those weird bags freak me out. Does he have a 'condition' of some sort?

by Anonymousreply 14702/04/2019

I don't get r146. Is that another threat? ARE YOU BRYAN SINGER?

by Anonymousreply 14802/04/2019

#23 comment got it right, it is too true, celebrities are public figures, they are easy targets.

by Anonymousreply 14902/04/2019

So Singer tapped that?

by Anonymousreply 15002/04/2019

r147 that, and what's with the way he talks? Coke jaw?

by Anonymousreply 15102/04/2019

Singer must be an extremely wealthy man.

by Anonymousreply 15202/04/2019

I am no shill but I certainly do not believe Singer nor Spacey are going to jail.

by Anonymousreply 15302/04/2019

I think Rami should have his bags fixed, if that is possible.

by Anonymousreply 15402/04/2019

Someone please help me out here. Singer has never been charged or convicted of anything. He has never lost any type of sexually related civil case much less even settled out of court. And the only alleged underage victim of his that has ever gone public with their name is this one guy from Apt Pupil in the new Atlantic article. Am I missing any facts?

by Anonymousreply 15502/04/2019

He has made out of court settlements.

by Anonymousreply 15602/04/2019

You go with that R155. LOL.

by Anonymousreply 15702/04/2019

r155 A few, may dear. There are four underaged victims in the Atlantic article and people have gone public before, like Michael Egan.

by Anonymousreply 15802/04/2019

r155, Singer settled with 5 boys in 2014 for $20 million. He would have settled with Michael Egan for $100,000, but Egan refused to accept the money because it meant he would've had to sign an NDA and never talk about the case again. A fact that those who keep claiming he's all in for the money neglect to bring up.

That's basically Singer's M.O. -- deny allegations vociferously in public, settle with huge payments in private. That way he can claim he's never admitted to guilt and never been tried in a court of law. It's how rich predators like Weinstein and Cosby were able to escape for so long. Fortunately, they are being shunned from the industry now, but Singer is obviously being protected and/or excused do to his box office track record, as his career continues apace.

I only hope that karma really exists and he gets the justice he so richly deserves.

by Anonymousreply 15902/04/2019

Singer is probably a very dangerous man having lots of dirt on others, but there is no way the public will accept him again. He is not even a beloved star, like so many others that have fallen from grace. He needs to retire or die.

by Anonymousreply 16002/04/2019

[quote]There are also 2 major directors everyone in town knows abuse children. One is an icon who probably won't fall ever. He was ditching comments on Singer last week.

Well, it certainly wasn't me, Stephen Sondheim. I'm not even a director. Don't judge a man by his initials.

by Anonymousreply 16102/06/2019

[quote]I think Rami should have his bags fixed, if that is possible.

He just needs cheek implants.

by Anonymousreply 16202/06/2019
by Anonymousreply 16302/06/2019

BAFTA has removed his name from Bo-Rhap's Best Picture nomination. It is the great to see the industry finally providing some accountability.

by Anonymousreply 16402/06/2019

Here's the link

by Anonymousreply 16502/06/2019

Fox also issued a brief statement, saying: “We fully support BAFTA’s decision.”

Haha, I bet. Cast the fucker out Hollywood!

by Anonymousreply 16602/06/2019

Red Sonja has been put on ice

by Anonymousreply 16702/11/2019

R57 is onto something...there was a blind item on AGC a few years ago that hinted that Heather’s death was suspicious and there was a cover up. Some altering of the death certificate. She may or may not have died as a result of sexual abuse. I cringe at what the details were. Poor little girl.

by Anonymousreply 16802/11/2019

[quote] And I said already Matthew Morrison is one of the people who would frequent Singers parties and brought young guys for Singer but no one believed me. He also got Mark Salling into the child porn.

Poor Mark Salling, lured into pedophilia... yeah right. I don't think it goes quite like that. On top of that I remember Salling having pics of pre-pubescent girls on his computer. Say what you want about Singer but at least he's not into kids that young. I've no idea what Matthew Morrison is into but since your post seems to be more fantasy than reality I suspect he's got nothing to do with anything.

by Anonymousreply 16902/11/2019

Was Mark Salling murdered?

by Anonymousreply 17002/11/2019

He was murdered. Covered as a suicide.

by Anonymousreply 17102/11/2019

What dirt did he have and on who I wonder.......

by Anonymousreply 17202/11/2019

"10 Disturbing Stories About Hollywood’s Pedophile Problem"------Bryan Singer (and friends) gets a shoutout....

by Anonymousreply 17302/11/2019

He’ll be back. He’s just too talented. Unless he self destructs further in his personal life, Hollywood will eventually forgive him.

by Anonymousreply 17402/11/2019

R174 Sorry but under no definition of the word could Singer be called “talented” and no one goes to see his movies because his name is on it. Any film school graduate can do his job better than him.

by Anonymousreply 17502/11/2019

He is not Roman Polanski

by Anonymousreply 17602/11/2019

I told you Red Sonja wouldn’t happen. His career is over, and so is any attempt at a mainstream career from that revolting producer.

by Anonymousreply 17702/11/2019

We can hope. Bryan Singer has long had the ability to come back over and over, like the worst case of herpes.

by Anonymousreply 17802/11/2019

[QUOTE]Sorry but under no definition of the word could Singer be called “talented”

Please. He’s made some of the most memorable pictures over the past few decades. Hate on his personal life all you want, but you can’t deny that he makes good movies.

by Anonymousreply 17902/11/2019

.... super hero flicks are not memorable.

by Anonymousreply 18002/11/2019

Days of Future Past is very memorable

by Anonymousreply 18102/11/2019

I think that Bryan Singer's career is on borrowed time. He may have to leave the country.

by Anonymousreply 18202/11/2019

BRIAN SINGER IS INNOCENT

IT IS ALL MADE UP

by Anonymousreply 18302/11/2019

Funny - John Doe the CDAN fan obsessed with Bryan Singer and pedophiles seems to love deleting their Twitter history, as they have been around since September of 2017 around when the alt-right started loving Enty, but most all of his tweets until April of 2018 are missing. Something looks fishy...

John Doe has also gone on a politics rant that all but signals their true colors, as they tried claiming Rosanne was kicked off because of being a Republican and went on a lengthy tirade about the Dems controlling everything and taking over the world. Rant all you want, the pedophiles in Hollywood aren't getting exposed by the likes of JohnDoe, CDAN or An Open Secret.

by Anonymousreply 18402/11/2019

Is this guy known primarily for making overblown superhero movies? Because if that's the case, then this is no great loss.

by Anonymousreply 18502/11/2019

I wouldn't care if his resume included All About Eve, Lawrence of Arabia and Gandhi, if he's a fucking pedophile and rapist, he needs to be brought down. Period.

by Anonymousreply 18602/11/2019

r179, are you high? What are some of his films that are "the most memorable of all time"? Besides maybe The Usual Suspects. Go ahead, we're all waiting.

by Anonymousreply 18702/11/2019

I like Singer's movies, but he's hardly a De Palma or a Spielberg or Lucas or Cameron. He hasn't changed the face of cinema.

by Anonymousreply 18802/11/2019

Yeah it's not that he was a bad director, but we can totally go on without him with little loss.

by Anonymousreply 18902/11/2019

[Quote] . I've no idea what Matthew Morrison is into but since your post seems to be more fantasy than reality I suspect he's got nothing to do with anything.

Most of the interest in MM seems to be because of Camp Podwall.

by Anonymousreply 19002/12/2019

[QUOTE]What are some of his films that are "the most memorable of all time"?

How about Bohemian Rhapsody?

by Anonymousreply 19102/12/2019

Yeah, but no one wants to hire him for lying high in a ditch and alternatively throw destructive tantrums until they have to fire and finish the film without him anyway. Singer deserves to never work in this town again just for his BR behaviour alone.

by Anonymousreply 19202/12/2019

But it resulted in a good movie that made hundreds of millions of dollars in profit. Hollywood will take that over a director who produces shit any day of the week. If BR was a flop then it might have hurt him.

Singer is not going away. The movie world is filled with trash directors and he stands tall above them. Unless he’s prosecuted for a crime, some company will take a risk on him once the heat dies down.

by Anonymousreply 19302/12/2019

[Quote] The movie world is filled with trash directors

I know, isn't it great?!

by Anonymousreply 19402/12/2019

No, R193. He’s done. He will never work in this country again.

by Anonymousreply 19502/12/2019

Forbes throws down on Bryan Singer------"Hiring Bryan Singer To Direct 'Red Sonja' Was Always A Disastrous Idea"

by Anonymousreply 19602/12/2019

Professor X plays the "problems with Bryan Singer card"-----"Patrick Stewart on marijuana, leaving Labour, and working with Bryan Singer: 'I had problems too'

by Anonymousreply 19702/12/2019

What did Steward say? I don't want to register.

by Anonymousreply 19802/12/2019

"I like Singer's movies, but he's hardly a De Palma or a Spielberg or Lucas or Cameron. He hasn't changed the face of cinema."

When did De Palma change the face on anything?

by Anonymousreply 19902/12/2019

Whoops, meant the face OF anything

by Anonymousreply 20002/12/2019

R199 I agree. Outside of Scarface, I can't think of any other remarkable movie from his filmography. And Scarface is great only because of Al Pacino, Oliver Stone, and Giorgio Moroder.

by Anonymousreply 20102/12/2019

Scarface was heterosexual camp. And not in a good way.

by Anonymousreply 20202/12/2019

Scarface was a remarkable movie for its time. There was nothing else like it. Hell, even now you’d be hard pressed to make a gangster movie that can touch it. Only Scorsese and David Chase have succeeded.

by Anonymousreply 20302/12/2019

Untouchables

Carrie

Scarface

Dressed to Kill

by Anonymousreply 20402/12/2019

r193 The success also shows what could have been lost by Singer's antics though.

by Anonymousreply 20502/12/2019

“What could have been.” It either was or it wasn’t. My aunt could have been my uncle if she had a dick. The bottom line is that a billion dollar hit movie was created, and that’s not an easy thing to do. Being a director is very hard work, and few people can do it successfully. Brian is one of those people.

by Anonymousreply 20602/12/2019

R204, The Fury and Blow Out are also terrific. The Fury, in particular, is full of extravagant, brilliantly-edited set-pieces. One of de Palma’s earliest films, Sisters, is hampered by some so-so performances but it’s a classic low budget horror movie. Singer, by contrast has . . . . Jack the Giant Killer?

by Anonymousreply 20702/12/2019

r206 He might have cost BR the ensemble cast award. I would not want the headache to hire him.

by Anonymousreply 20802/12/2019

Queen Survivor begs for forgiveness----unlike Oscar Beggar Rami Malek-----"Brian May Apologises After Appearing To Defend Bryan Singer"

by Anonymousreply 20902/12/2019

r207....i agree...I was only giving an example to the poster who said De Palma hasnt produced any memorable films other than Scarface. It shows how people really are clueless if it didnt happen in their lifetime. Singers claim to fame will be The Usual Suspects and he lucked into that....the rest of his work is forgettable....face it, comic book films are not considered art or serious regardless of the production values and how much money they make.

by Anonymousreply 21002/12/2019

Bohemian Rhapsody is GARBAGE — it’s a hit because a bunch of teeny bopper fans discovered Queen for the first time when it was released. That’s the only reason. It’s awful homophobic trash — horrible acting, atrocious script, pathetic editing — that should have flopped based on Malek’s ridiculous prosthetic teeth alone but Queen music is undeniable.

by Anonymousreply 21102/12/2019

I concur r211.... Im amazed at the people who think this is the best thing since sliced bread. And I was alive during their heyday....I sure as hell dont remember Freddie Mercury being a sex symbol....and Queen didnt die when Freddie Mercury died....it died years before.

by Anonymousreply 21202/12/2019

Such nonsense r211, of course you can observe the teenypoppers going crazy online. They are not the whole audience. Queen fans up to 70 love the film. As do Queen knowers of 3 hits and wow they did that song too - and that! Of all ages. It's a great film it really works on all levels and engrosses people, the vast majority of millions of viewers. Good damn work! It's ridiculous to deny the great acting. Pathetic editing ....? Is this actually satire. Are you just a misunderstood comic?

There is not "one reason" some middling budget/middling expectations movie soars close to a billion at the box office. There are many reasons.

by Anonymousreply 21302/12/2019

r212 Yes, we know. You are the tasteless old Queen hater, a critique on Bohemian Rhapsody couldn't come from a more trustworthy source.

[quote] I sure as hell dont remember Freddie Mercury being a sex symbol...

Sooo? Please give a little hint what this has to do with the movie. Rami turned you on too much?

by Anonymousreply 21402/12/2019

[quote] When did De Palma change the face on anything?

If you don't know film, just say so.

by Anonymousreply 21502/12/2019

Lord, r213. For the 1,000th time, Bohemian Rhapsody performed as well as it did because Queen is a popular band with numerous hits and a global fan base. Any idiot could've directed that movie and achieved the exact same success as Bryan Singer.

I will give him credit for the visual flair he brought to the X-Men movies. But he brought absolutely nothing unique to Bo-Rhap. He wasn't even involved in the editing process due to being kicked off the movie (and thus is not nominated for the editing Oscar).

If you think he brought something unique to the movie, I invite you to say what it is.

BTW, anyone who thinks Singer is staying on Red Sonja is an idiot. It's one thing for (also accused sexual predator) Avi Lerner to act all Trumpish in saying that he's sticking with him no matter what. It's another thing that multiple alleged sexual predator Singer is being asked to helm a big-budget movie about -- guess what-- someone who is a survivor of sexual assault. If you don't think the bean counters don't see that as a massive marketing problem, you must as gullible as the fraus who think Ryan Seacrest is straight. They will find a replacement, they just want to figure out their options first.

by Anonymousreply 21602/12/2019

Yes, the movie made over $800 million cause people wanted to hear the same songs they can hear for free or download.

by Anonymousreply 21702/12/2019

There's a difference between hearing a song on your stereo system and seeing a reenactment of a legendary rock band's performances in a theater with Surround Sound with a bunch of other Queen fans, nimrod. People went for the experience, much like they did when they saw Michael Jackson's "This Is It" and made it the #1 music concert movie of all time (until Bieber's overtook it). They could hear MJ's music at home, too.

by Anonymousreply 21802/12/2019

There’s Youtube you dimwit... for free. You can watch the Live Aide and hundreds to thousands of Queen performances and music videos...

The film didn’t make over $800 million to hear music.

by Anonymousreply 21902/12/2019

Right, because watching "We Are the Champions" on your laptop compares to seeing it in a theater.

I know you probably enjoyed being at Singer's parties/like the money he's giving yo for this, but you're doing a terrible job defending him on here. Your sugar daddy is done, friend.

by Anonymousreply 22002/12/2019

BTW, you still haven't identified one unique thing Bryan Singer brought to the table.

by Anonymousreply 22102/12/2019

A deranged Singer/Malek troll has arrived.

by Anonymousreply 22202/12/2019

Deranged is someone who thinks a movie made $844 million to watch actors reenact their favorite songs...

by Anonymousreply 22302/12/2019

BTW, you still haven't identified one unique thing Bryan Singer brought to the movie, r223. What's taking you so long?

by Anonymousreply 22402/12/2019

R223 is so silly. Saying people went to see a Queen biopic because of Bryan Singer's directorial skill is like saying people went to see The Hunger Games or Jurassic World because of the acting of Jennifer Lawrence or Chris Pratt. People were gonna see those movies (which also made hundreds of millions) regardless.

by Anonymousreply 22502/12/2019

I’m not the one that said they went to watch Singer. I’m someone else. People went for queen and positive word of mouth led to the film making tons of money and being one of the higher rated movies from viewers all over the world.

by Anonymousreply 22602/12/2019

Bryan Singer is #22 on the list of highest grossing directors of all time. Nobody whose films have collectively grossed over a billion dollars will get turned away from Hollywood if he really wants to direct a movie.

by Anonymousreply 22702/12/2019

He really wants to direct a movie, R227, and it’s not going to happen.

by Anonymousreply 22802/13/2019

Hollywood doesn't like to take chances with celebs who face a current (social) media backlash. Hollywood doesn't give a shit about criminal behavior. But it does care when their players get caught and face consequences then it's all "I don't know her!".

by Anonymousreply 22902/13/2019

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a man in possession of a good fortune, is entitled to an unlimited supply of human disposable fucktoys.

by Anonymousreply 23002/13/2019

R227, where is this list? And he may have made a lot of money, but most of his films have been popcorn movies that didn't need a visionary. He's not a gamechanging filmmaker and easily replaced.

by Anonymousreply 23102/13/2019

[quote] But he brought absolutely nothing unique to Bo-Rhap. He wasn't even involved in the editing process due to being kicked off the movie (and thus is not nominated for the editing Oscar).

I don't know what exactly we can credit to Singer. No one could know, who wasn't heavily involved. You have to consider that the post production editing is not the most creative part. Most things are planned out and actually drawn out with pencil and paper before filming even starts.

There is fantastic editing in BR. (It also won the price from the editor's guild) Youtube just kindly reminded me of the scene in which May presents his "We will rock you" idea to the band. The way them trying it out in the studio, just humouring him, is intercut with a full Stadion stomping along - back and forth - is orgasmic. Makes you dizzy, makes you high. It's truly artfully and flawlessly done. Those prices for editing and sound editing(or whatever it was at the BaFTAs) are fully deserved.

Was that mostly due to Singer's creativity or not? I don't know, but I'm more than happy seeing the other people involved getting awards and him being shut out for being a rapist and unprofessional asshole. No complaints from my side.

No way they are going to go ahead with him with Red Sonja. Not worth it, no matter how awesome he might have in BR pre-production. Btw, concerning the article pushing for a female director: I loved Kathrine Bigelow back when she did action movies. Come on, at least try to throw some tens of millions at her, it could be amazing!

by Anonymousreply 23202/13/2019

[quote]BTW, you still haven't identified one unique thing Bryan Singer brought to the table.

I'm not the one you were replying to but it's insane that some people seem to treat him as a garbage director. Singer is a very capable director who's able to a create wonderful mood in his films. Not all of his projects work, however, but for whatever reason almost all of his X-Men films do. Only the last one, X-Men: Apocalypse, was unfortunately a bland and boring mess. It was gorgeous looking but it didn't come even near the emotional impact of any of his earlier X-Men films. X2 and Days of Future Past are still my all time favorite superhero films. Singer was able to infuse his X-Men films with something almost magical, something none of the other Marvel films have come even close to. That is partly why he's still been able to work after all the earlier Egan accusations. I'm fairly certain Fox has been fully aware of his actions over the years but they wanted to keep his talent in the house.

BTW, I'm still waiting for solid proof of his actions. I don't care if he likes twinks if it's legal. It's yucky, yes, but if the guys he fucks are over 16 AND are not forced in any way I don't care. If it turns out he's fucked guys under 15 things get different, though. I really want to see what happens with the latest accusations, especially the one with the 14 year old kid. I do hope it's not true but unfortunately it's not looking too good for Singer at the moment.

by Anonymousreply 23302/13/2019

Singer is like herpes; he never goes away. We have all been gleefully shouting about his demise every few years when a scandal breaks. This is just another one. He will move on, and so will Hollywood

by Anonymousreply 23402/13/2019

R233 Capable is not visionary. Singer is absolutely a capable director.

Also, 18 is the age of consent in California.

by Anonymousreply 23502/13/2019

No, R234. It’s over.

by Anonymousreply 23602/13/2019

"Patrick Stewart claims Bryan Singer is 'looking for power'----"Sir Patrick Stewart thinks Bryan Singer is "looking for power".

The 78-year-old actor has worked with the director - who was fired from 'Bohemian Rhapsody' in December 2017 and has denied accusations of sexual misconduct - on five 'X-Men' movies and believes the "horrible" filmmaker seeks out "control over other people".

Speaking of the director in an interview with the Daily Telegraph newspaper, the 'Star Trek' actor said: "This sense of...looking for power, when you've already got it and you don't actually need it... Looking for control over other people, who you can dominate - it's horrible."

Rami Malek recently admitted working with Bryan on 'Bohemian Rhapsody' was "not pleasant" and it has been claimed the director would often be absent from set, and Patrick confirmed he had experienced similar issues shooting with the 53-year-old filmmaker.

Patrick continued: "I've experienced that too with him. There have been problems in the past."

When asked if Bryan would often be absent on key days, Patrick continued: "Yeah. Or turning up and not shooting.

"It was very difficult. We got through that. He's such a talented individual in the would of making movies - and, it would appear, extremely untalented and cruel in other respects.

"And it makes me profoundly sad for potential victims, or possible victims, as well as Bryan himself."

by Anonymousreply 23702/13/2019

Interesting interview, thanks. Patrick Steward sure implies he believes every word written about Singer. And he is not afraid to publicly judge him.

by Anonymousreply 23802/13/2019

Oscar Beggar Rami Malek gets called out as a LIAR (not knowing about Singers Reputation ) on Blind Gossip piece---------"[Blind Gossip] Today is the first day of Oscar voting… and the producers of one film are in a full-out panic!

We already told you that to better their chances of winning an Academy Award for something, they fabricated a couple of whoppers.

The first is that the star of the movie is in a relationship with another celebrity. Lie!

The second is that the lead had no idea about the history of a very bad person associated with the movie. Lie!

Now, after an announcement that signals that Hollywood is actively distancing themselves from that very bad person, they are worried that Academy voters will reject them as well!

They can’t run a regular campaign. They have one week – ONE WEEK – to convince voters not to punish them. They are kicking around ideas right now. They are going to do something dramatic in the next couple of days. They have to salvage this."

by Anonymousreply 23902/13/2019

Singer's talent is exaggerated.

The "talent" proclamation feeds into the BS notion that these demigods don't have to follow the same rules as mere mortals because they have some rare talent that the world can't live without. So, if they molest kids that is just the price the world has to pay to benefit from their rare talent. It's the same BS with Woody Allen.

Singer's main "talent" is pimping out children to his fellow Hollywood pedos in exchange for connections and opportunities.

by Anonymousreply 24002/13/2019

Not expecting something dramatic from BR and there is less reason to be worried than before the BAFTAs. Just lay low and collect the Oscar(s).

by Anonymousreply 24102/13/2019

Rami is not doing anything “dramatics”

Please already

by Anonymousreply 24202/13/2019

Rami does NOT deserve that Oscar and the fact he’s gotten this far makes me wonder just how many millions the studio has sunk into his campaign.

And sorry but Bohemian Rhapsody is still garbage regardless of how much money it’s made. Michael Bay movies make a shit-ton of money too. You’ll never go broke playing to the poor taste of the general public.

by Anonymousreply 24302/13/2019

R243 no one is putting millions into Rami Malek.

They do that for huge stars. He’s new at this.

by Anonymousreply 24402/13/2019

R244 he’s certainly not considered the front runner based on merit, believe me. (He shouldn’t even have a nom based on merit.) Unless he’s fucking the CEO of the Academy, someone’s paying for this.

by Anonymousreply 24502/13/2019

[quote]he’s certainly not considered the front runner based on merit, believe me.

Apparently, the BAFTAs don't believe you.

by Anonymousreply 24602/13/2019

R243 = Agreed. Rami Malek is a disgusting person. With his fake girlfriend and lies about not knowing Bryan Singer had multiple accusers going back decades. Rami Malek is filth.

by Anonymousreply 24702/13/2019

Rami Malek is certainly considered the frontrunner, based on merit, believe me. For I actually know what I'm talking about.

He is a likeable guy too though, nevermind the ridiculous hate campaign r247 has going on. Jesus, I hope they pay you well.

by Anonymousreply 24802/13/2019

Oh boy, the "I hate Rami" troll is back. Between the negative posts about Christian Bale on the Gossip thread and this, I'm starting to think Bradley Cooper's PR people are working overtime, lol.

Listen you psycho -- I don't care how much you hate him. He's already won the Golden Globe, SAG, and BAFTA. His Oscar win is a foregone conclusion, and his career is about to skyrocket. I can only hope that you shut the fuck up after he accepts the little gold man, because at that point it will all be for naught.

by Anonymousreply 24902/13/2019

Comparing Bohemian Rhapsody to Michael Bay is beyond old. The Transformer movies are supposed to be action blockbuster, Bohemian Rhapsody is a surprise hit of epic proportions, because people find they absolutely love it. There is pretty much nothing to compare it too in terms of genre and success, except to say something like: Holy Shit it made more than twice as much money as ASIB.

by Anonymousreply 25002/13/2019

[quote] Between the negative posts about Christian Bale on the Gossip thread and this, I'm starting to think Bradley Cooper's PR people are working overtime, lol.

I think you are on to something. Obviously Bale has this family scandal one can latch on to, but the recent posts are pretty intense for someone screaming and possibly shoving his mom 10 years ago. The attempts of painting Malek as a villain for possibly being in a PR relationship like possibly everyone else and for ... Singer being a pervert(?) are just ludicrous of course.

by Anonymousreply 25102/13/2019

Rami Malek has been in Hollywood for 15 years --and gay at that---and expects anyone to believe he "never heard of" accusations against Bryan Singer? Hopefully The Academy will not reward that kind of dishonesty. Why waste an Oscar on of two bit TV actor?

by Anonymousreply 25202/14/2019

I didn't care about Rami Malek. But now that I know it will piss off the obsessed pizza gate loon who posts here, I pray to Jesus H. Christ that he wins the Oscar two years in a row.

by Anonymousreply 25302/14/2019

Don't worry r252, the Academy will reward his terrific performance, not his gossip skills.

by Anonymousreply 25402/14/2019

If Rami Malek wins an Oscar, it will be the an insult to the actors who did NOT work with accused pedophile directors...

by Anonymousreply 25502/14/2019

Hahahahaha, good one.

by Anonymousreply 25602/14/2019

R240, I think you are the only one making sense in the last posts, doesn't matter how much money he make or how talented is Singer (remember? The thread is about him?) He is not entitled to broke the law and abuse boys.

Sadly the culture is very protective of the rich and the famous (just like the feudal culture used to do with the royal families) that means he is not going to jail.

by Anonymousreply 25702/14/2019

[Quote] . Btw, concerning the article pushing for a female director: I loved Kathrine Bigelow back when she did action movies. Come on, at least try to throw some tens of millions at her, it could be amazing!

They should be doing that with lots of female directors.

[Quote] Hopefully The Academy will not reward that kind of dishonesty. Why waste an Oscar on of two bit TV actor?

Lol since when does The Academy care about that??

by Anonymousreply 25802/14/2019

Happy Valentine's Day everyone!

by Anonymousreply 25902/14/2019

Fuck off, R259.

by Anonymousreply 26002/14/2019

"If Rami Malek wins an Oscar, it will be the an insult to the actors who did NOT work with accused pedophile directors..."

A LOT of big name actors have worked with Singer - why single out Malek?

by Anonymousreply 26102/14/2019

Not to mention with all the other accused pedophiles like Woody and Roman... plus the other sex criminals. Please, no one in Hollywood and no one who isn't a complete idiot in general is pointing a finger at RM.

by Anonymousreply 26202/14/2019

Singer's collapse is so complete he has the most popular movie in the world which will win the Oscar for Best Picture next week if all is right with the world. Clutch those pearls, silly ladies.

by Anonymousreply 26302/14/2019

If it wins Best Picture, it will be in spite of him, not because of him. Btw, does anyone know if he'll be attending the ceremony? If he does, I can't wait for the mass awkwardness that will result

by Anonymousreply 26402/14/2019

He did a damn good job directing that film. No amount of shade and morality police can change that.+

by Anonymousreply 26502/14/2019

r264 No way, he isn't nominated and he sure as hell isn't invited. Don't take it too hard in case you are Bryan r265. You can have fun at home watching the broadcast and taking a sip every time no one says your name!

I gotta say that many people feel that to do a damn good hob directing a movie, you are expected to show up.

by Anonymousreply 26602/14/2019

[quote] he isn't nominated

But he's an executive producer for Best Picture nominee, Bohemian Rhapsody. If that picture had won a BAFTA for best picture, he would have been named as one of the producers eligible to accept the award, but the BAFTA people took him off the credits for the purpose of those awards to avoid embarrassment (theirs).

Did the Academy do the same? Not sure.

by Anonymousreply 26702/14/2019

BR actually won the Golden Globe. Graham King accepted with Roger Taylor, Brian May and Jim Beach. There is no mystery, that's what would happen at the Oscars as well.

The BAFTAs were the only ones who had Singer on the list, so they were the only ones who had to uninvite him.

by Anonymousreply 26802/14/2019

Singers name hasn’t been listed by anyone but BAFTA and they revoked that.

Malek gave a sensational performance

by Anonymousreply 26902/14/2019

So I just went through this thread, being that I’ve not had an opportunity to do so last week.

I don’t know how to express stuff that I’m feeling right now. There is a post upthread, at R55, that points to accusations of paedophilia, made by Isaac Kappy.

I rented an apartment to Isaac some years back. I didn’t get to know him well, but from what I was able to ascertain, he seemed like a pretty normal, hipster dude, who was bitten by the Hollywood bug, & wanted to work in the industry, at whatever capacity. Nothing out of the ordinary, if you live in LA, because that’s what almost everyone who moves here wants to do.

There were no red flags pointing to what I witnessed by watching these YouTube videos for the first time, today. I’m also going to speculate that Kappy posts here, but I could be wrong.

Anyhow, what bothers me profoundly from what I interpreted from viewing these videos, is that Isaac, who I rented a unit to , and seemed completely normal at the time, always paid his rent on time, etc., actually truly believes the stuff he’s saying.

I don’t know if he was having a mental health crisis, or abusing drugs, or both, but it is obvious that he is not well.

That all being said, Isaac is not completely responsible for this particular zeitgeist appealing to him for the obvious reasons: if it’s due to mental illness or addiction, he is not responsible for the emergence of said mental illness, nor is he responsible for becoming addicted to substances that may lead up to addiction. No one has any way of knowing the outcomes for them, personally, when deciding to throw caution to the wind, and do a line at a party with some friends.

Either way, Isaac has probably experienced some abuse and trauma in his life. He feels powerless to resolve those issues, for whatever reasons, and he, just like millions of Americans who have gone in deep with the Q-Anon stuff, find this paedophilia fiction to be a way or an opportunity, for them to emerge as heroes, with purpose and meaning. It is almost as if these present day conspiracy theories, allow unfulfilled people to find meaningful work in the specialties of accusations and deception, rather than in truly charitable pursuits. The internet now caters to people who are all too lazy to get outside, and do real acts of kindness. Q-Anon tells them that their work is to expose the predators, right from their living rooms, without any real proof, or actual investigative work. So off to social media they go!

Of course, the other side of this could be that Isaac isn’t mentally unwell at all, and recognizing that Alex Jones won’t live forever, has decided to surreptitiously relieve Alex Jones of his duties, and is making a bold attempt to become the new face in chicanery and obfuscation.

There is a problem with abuse of power and exploitation in almost every system, and nook and cranny that one wants to dig into, as proven by the Catholic Church. But to get on YouTube, and accuse your friends of paedophilia, seems to be something that is happening because Isaac is not well, and is in a lot of mental anguish, & emotional pain. I also suspect that his friends suspected that Isaac had become obsessed with Q-Anon & Pizzagate, and decided to fuck with him, by telling him they were inviting him into their cabal. Unfortunately, Isaac actually believed it.

I hope he gets the help he needs. It angers me to see several people who were once close friends (not Isaac, though I am concerned for his mental well-being) completely fall for this Q-Anon stuff. It really is triggering a large swath of people into discussing this shit in social gatherings ad nauseum, as if it is all true, and factual.

Pizzagate and pedogate are the new UFO sightings and extraterrestrial probe. And though it is pretty funny to see people fall for this shit on the surface, it points to a profound abyss of a hardcore, Capitalistic society, chewing up those not able to stand up on their own two feet and thrive within that society, due to whatever vulnerabilities.

by Anonymousreply 27002/14/2019

r270, no one here gives a shit about Isaac Kappy -- we're talking about Bryan Singer. You should've started a new thread.

by Anonymousreply 27102/14/2019

R270 = did you ever rent a unit to Rami Malek? If so, did he ever laugh or show zero concern over 13 year old boys being molested? He certainly didn't care up until 2018.. Also did Rami have fake girlfriends over to his unit?

by Anonymousreply 27202/14/2019

Lol, R270. True enough.

R273, do you have shit for brains???

How the fuck is Rami Makek responsible for Singer’s behavior? Especially for shit he did when Rami himself, was probably attending kindergarten, and was busy being a kid.

And why are you bothered about Makek’s sexuality, cunt? Fuck you. So many of you here are just truly and genuinely stupid, and/or mentally ill.

by Anonymousreply 27302/14/2019

Who’s the guy who keeps asking what unique thing Bryan Singer brought to the table when he basically created the modern day comic movie with X-Men and X2? Every Marvel movie that has since debuted basically took multiple pages from Bryan’s playbook. The work he did modernizing the X-Men was extraordinary.

by Anonymousreply 27402/14/2019

I’m not the poster you are referring to, R274, but I have to say that’s honestly funny. You meant all that as a joke, didn’t you? Because “modern day comic book movies” are almost universally recognized as boring, affectless nothings. They are the next step in the death of movies.

by Anonymousreply 27502/14/2019

Which is why we must reward a movie that makes a billion dollars worldwide (box office alone) and doesn't include a space ship, a car chase or even a gun in it. It's a true accomplishment and Singer was a huge part of it, even if the pearl clutchers hate the idea.

by Anonymousreply 27602/14/2019

r274, I'm that guy. And if you were actually paying attention, you'd know that I was responding to Singer's paid hack who kept crowing about how Singer deserved credit due to Bohemain Rhapsody making so much money. In response, I asked what Singer brought to the table that made so many people come? Of course, that person never answered. That's because there was absolutely nothing special about his direction, it was pedestrian at best. Also, he was not involved in the editing, so he can't take any credit for that.

by Anonymousreply 27702/14/2019

R274/R275, I like comic book movies. I even like Singer's comic book movies. But I strongly doubt any of them will be in heavy rotation 25 or 40 years from now.

R276, my only thing with BR is there were reports that Singer was a mess on set, missing work, etc so who knows how much of the finished film is "by Bryan Singer"? Is it 20%? 40%? 60%?

by Anonymousreply 27802/14/2019

Malek is not responsible for Singer’s behavior. Nonetheless his performance is horrible and the movie deserves to win NOTHING.

by Anonymousreply 27902/14/2019

R273 Rami Malek is almost FORTY. If you believe he "never knew" about Bryan Singer you are as shameless as the Oscar Beggar Rami Malek!! Shame on you!

by Anonymousreply 28002/14/2019

R280, thanks. Didn’t know Malik was almost 40.

Anyhow, I’m now deep in the rabbit hole with the guy I Isaac Kappy that I rented my unit to years ago.

JFC. This guy is actually COMPLETELY & utterly NUTS. I’m actually concerned. I would assume that he’s on some sort of watch list, but then, I’m assuming that other people who knew people who went out and did mass shootings, probably thought that those nuts were being observed or on a watch list. And a watch list means shit.

I’m watching this video, below, and I’m honestly considering getting in touch with LEOs tomorrow morning. It’s unbelievable that this is the same person I rented to. I swear that the guy I rented to was completely normal acting. Fuck, obviously, or I would not have rented to him.

This personality that he’s exhibiting in the video, is the archetypal of men who go out and shoot a bunch of people.

Yeah. I’m calling. I would shit myself if this guy did something, and I knew I should’ve said something and didn’t. He is genuinely frightening.

by Anonymousreply 28102/14/2019

I'm really enjoying this Isaac Kappy troll trying to get us to stop talking about Singer. Good luck!

by Anonymousreply 28202/14/2019

JFC, we have been talking about Bryan Singer for the last 20 plus fucking years!!! I, myself, have contributed TONS to these threads because of my previous position at DEN.

What the fuck more can we say, that we all haven’t said? I have no quibble with all of us dragging Bryan over the coals again, since it has indeed, become an annual event for us long term DLers. The guy is a fucking rapist, and doesn’t believe he is. We all know, bitch.

I am having a momentary crisis, BECAUSE I RENTED MY PROPERTY TO AN ABSOLUTE PSYCHOPATH, who I didn’t know was a psychopath, until I came on this thread, to talk shit about Bryan Singer.

Block me if you don’t want to read about it.

by Anonymousreply 28302/14/2019

R283 -----And LIAR Rami Malek claims he "didn't know" about Bryan Singer. Even if Rami has never been on DL (which is doubtful), we are supposed to believe Rami never read Hollywood Reporter or Variety or Vulture? Give me a friggin break. Rami Malek knew and wanted the paycheck. Rami never had any complaints about Bryan Singer until HE had to explain working with an accused Pedo Director.

by Anonymousreply 28402/14/2019

In case you missed it----"An Extensive Breakdown On Alleged Pedophile, Bryan Singer!"---------"Not only does everyone know about Singer, but they also talk freely about his long-term friends finding young, naive boys who want to make it in the entertainment industry. But those allegations and friends' names are for another story or maybe they'll all come out with the rest of the facts once Singer is out of the "alleged " category and officially charged."

by Anonymousreply 28502/14/2019

r283 Singer is a psychopath. Your guy is in no way a psychopath. You mean you rented a unit to a guy who may have had a psychotic break, maybe developed schizophrenia, possibly triggered by drugs. It really is not that big of a deal? I mean sucks for him, but not so much for you. Schizophrenics on shooting sprees is not really a thing. If they murder than usually one close family member, but the VAST majority don't murder, but ramble forever.

Also a good example for a psychotic break: r284 You can easily observe the circular, unstoppable rambling.

by Anonymousreply 28602/14/2019

r277 Oh, dear, try to keep up. This site isn't you talking with one other person, you know? I was the first person (not the next 5) you asked what unique thing Singer brought to BR, though I never said that before, I did the reply to you back in r232. Summery: I don't now what exactly he brought, because of his firing/missing days before and because I simply was not there. But he might have brought something, especially in planning out the whole thing, including planning the editing. Someone or a group of people made a very good film. How much of it was Singer, we do. Not. Know.

by Anonymousreply 28702/14/2019

R286, thanks for your insight. You’re right. It really isn’t that big of a deal, especially because it’s past tense.

I became overly concerned due to observing someone who is completely different than the person I met when I rented him an apartment. I recognize the schizophrenia symptoms too. Thanks for pointing that out.

Poor guy. My heart really goes out to him, because he was an OK dude when I met him, and it appears that the possible schizophrenia and meds are profoundly affecting him.

by Anonymousreply 28802/14/2019

I think Malik is hot! I hope he has a long career.

by Anonymousreply 28902/15/2019

Another Story covering Bryan Singer released today----"Sexual abuse allegations seem to be catching up with Bryan Singer. The ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ director has dodged the allegations for years." ........."Singer has reportedly been an on-set menace for years, and accusations of sexual misconduct have followed him for just as long. From early on in his career, he’s been accused of everything from filming boys nude for a shower scene to sexually assaulting young actors."............

by Anonymousreply 29002/15/2019

[quote] And LIAR Rami Malek claims he "didn't know" about Bryan Singer.

Oh. My. God! Can you be any more self righteous? If you pick on Rami for this you have to pick on every single person in in the world, because we all lie to save our own skin at times. Unless you have undeniable proof that Rami Malek picked up a little boy and pushed him into a room with Bryan Singer and locked the door behind them (or stayed to watch) stop beating that dead horse. It's really dead. Singer and the actual powers to be in Hollywood who kept Singer safe and employed are to blame for Singer being able to stay in power and use his power to keep raping boys. Rami Malek has no clout in Hollywood.

by Anonymousreply 29102/15/2019

R237 Interesting that P Stewart is criticizing Singer in interviews. At the premier of Days of Future Past in London, Stewart gave a robust defense of Singer, commenting how their creative, whizz of a director was absent from the event due to unfair accusations ( Singer was in the midst of rape charges ), obviously Singer has fallen outside of the magic circle since then.

by Anonymousreply 29202/15/2019

Maybe I am just a refugee from the theater threads but by far the newest, most shocking gossip is the alleged involvement of Matthew Morrison! He is a very talented, married parent of a child! How can he be involved in any of this sordid crap!

SERIOUSLY!

by Anonymousreply 29302/15/2019

R293 = "Bryan is the father of Dashiell Julius William Clunie-Singer, who was born on January 5, 2015."-----Bryan Singer is a "parent" too....Lots of parents are hideous people.

by Anonymousreply 29402/15/2019

Is Dashiell a girl or a boy?

by Anonymousreply 29502/15/2019

R293 I never venture into those threads and know nothing about Matt Morrison. Are you being sarcastic? I watched glees first season and just assumed he was gay this whole time. Or is he married to a man?

by Anonymousreply 29602/15/2019

r295 Singer’s Kid is a boy. One can only fear what he does to him knowing Singer.

by Anonymousreply 29702/15/2019

R294. That name though, ugh. R297, his kid is like a toddler. He's safe for another 8 years

by Anonymousreply 29802/15/2019

Let’s hope his mother realises she needs to take steps to protect him.

by Anonymousreply 29902/15/2019

Another News Story mops up Bryan Singer = "Opening Up the Oscars: “Bohemian Rhapsody” Has Little Chance of Breaking Free from Bryan Singer’s Allegations" -------"The directing of the film is subpar, but former director Bryan Singer’s backstory is abysmal. Singer was fired for not showing up to work, and then he made headlines with several sexual assault allegations. Such problems will hopefully comprise whatever chances “Bohemian Rhapsody” once had at receiving the Oscar award for Best Picture."

by Anonymousreply 30002/15/2019

R299 Bryan Singers Baby Momma is an unemployed actress with a Fag Hag Complex. Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if she just gave birth ti Andy Cohens Demon Seed...

by Anonymousreply 30102/15/2019

The Daily Utah Journal? Give me a fucking break. They gave themselves away with their "hopefully compromise" statement. Pearl clutchers.

by Anonymousreply 30202/15/2019

Nobody has their pulse on the industry like the DUJ!

by Anonymousreply 30302/15/2019

Now I REALLY hope "Bohemian..." wins Best Picture, just to raise the blood pressure on all these pearl clutchers and cup cradlers. "Eeeek, they're REWARDING him?!"

by Anonymousreply 30402/15/2019

[quote]You have to consider that the post production editing is not the most creative part. Most things are planned out and actually drawn out with pencil and paper before filming even starts.

That's a profoundly ignorant thing to say.

by Anonymousreply 30502/15/2019

Bryan Singer's career is finally in freefall. This is a more beautiful sight than Timothee Chalamet's face in moonlight.

by Anonymousreply 30602/15/2019

Supposedly, the delightful Mr. Singer made comments to his friends hoping his son would have hot friends. He is just vile. Seriously vile.

by Anonymousreply 30702/15/2019

I'm hoping this is just some nonsense you picked up from CDAN, but sadly I can 100% see this being true. I wouldn't put it past someone like Singer to have a son so he could have another source of access to young males to sleep with. The man is a sociopath.

by Anonymousreply 30802/15/2019

R303, thanks for making me spit out my salad on my textbook from sheer laughter.

LMAO!

by Anonymousreply 30902/16/2019

Why doesn't this asshole just go away, apparently on top of being a perv he's also a shitty person in general as well as being a shitty director that apparently is rarely even on set.

by Anonymousreply 31002/17/2019

Yes, absolutely nothing is lost by "cancelling" Bryan Singer. The public is already over him (as far as they are aware of his existence), Hollywood has no reason to put up a fight.

I suppose some might miss his parties...

by Anonymousreply 31102/17/2019

They can't get rid of him. He has blackmail material on all of them.

by Anonymousreply 31202/17/2019

r312, I'm certain that's true. But given the power of the people he's blackmailing, I'm sure there's ways to cause an "accident" that will solve the problem for them. Considering he's inching closer to permanently damaged goods, I'm sure they're evaluating that option.

by Anonymousreply 31302/17/2019

Usually guys like Singer would prefer not to burn bridges by blackmailing higher ups. People in Hollywood, who have fallen from grace, hope for a big comeback further down the road which isn't very likely to happen when people in power stand in your way holding a grudge for blackmailing them.

by Anonymousreply 31402/18/2019

If the rumors are true about Spielberg and Geffen then I would love for them to to be exposed. It might give hope that if they can be brought, anyone can be brought down.

by Anonymousreply 31502/18/2019

So I see this thread is sinking itself into the depths of the QAnon, CDAN swamp.

It’s a shame that we cannot discuss events that are obviously quite real, without attaching the spin from lunatics and the mentally unwell, on to it all.

by Anonymousreply 31602/18/2019

Why are Geffen rumours ridiculous? Why is Singer obviously a rapist and Geffen obviously innocent? Seems like every second people could just start claiming "EVERYONE knew about Geffen for 3 decades at least!".

by Anonymousreply 31702/18/2019

I have heard people mention Geffen in relation to these rumors for years but never with any evidence or reason to back it up. There are pictures of Singer’s pool parties, pictures of him in a Catholic priest costume with very young men, decades of sightings/blind items, two lawsuits, one dead former child star (Renfro) and a number of men willing to go on the record about the abuse. If Geffen is so obviously known as a predator where is the similar trail of clues?

by Anonymousreply 31802/18/2019

I think Geffen has been involved in stuff over the years, however, he has always been more careful and circumspect when compared to someone like Singer. That’s what has got Singer in so much trouble, his carelessness and failure to be professional while working.

by Anonymousreply 31902/18/2019

r319 nails it. Whether Geffen has done anything or not, he’s obviously careful to not leave anything behind. Given how the Singer expose and Patrick Stewart interview indicated Singer was lazy for his entire career, it makes sense that he was sloppy enough to leave a huge trail behind.

by Anonymousreply 32002/18/2019

I came to expect fire wherever there is smoke to be honest. Not sure if I'd even want to know about SS, but why was he inviting MJ and that Peewee Herman to the sets of his kids films where they chatted up Corey Feldman? I don't know, if I want to know.

by Anonymousreply 32102/18/2019

Feldman’s an odd one considering he’s been a victim of pedophiles and vocally speaks about them yet is quite fond of Paul Reubens and MJ and more or less didn’t support the new doc on MJ. Although with Reubens that might be because the child porn he bought was in a bulk buy of porn he didn’t look through and got the sentence like an idiot as a result, so I can see why Feldman might put up with him. And I thought the CDAN and QANON crowd like AJ Benza thinks Feldman is a rapist and pedophile, so why do they bring him up if they hate him?

by Anonymousreply 32202/18/2019

Wasn't Reubens charged with public indecency for jerking off in a porn theatre? Never heard of him having child porn in his posession.

by Anonymousreply 32302/18/2019

I think Geffen at least went for actual adults 25 and up - NOT teens like Singer is accused of harming.

by Anonymousreply 32402/18/2019

r323 Both. He was charged with jerking off in a porn theatre and the child porn, although he managed to get out of the last one because it was part of a bulk buy of pornography and he was mad at the seller for not telling him it contained child porn.

by Anonymousreply 32502/18/2019

R323...he didnt....thats why he wasnt charged....I was friends with his boyfriend at the time.

by Anonymousreply 32602/18/2019

Strange that someone wants to attach some bogus pedo shit on Rubens, of all celebrities. Very random.

by Anonymousreply 32702/18/2019

He was arrested for child porn, so it's not exactly random

by Anonymousreply 32802/18/2019

I read Feldman's book and Rubens was far and away the creepiest part. He was supposedly randomly hanging out at the Goonies set making Feldman very uncomfortable until in a conversation he realised who it was and then it was awesome because he is such a fan!! End chapter. That with the later arrests paint a potentially pretty disturbing picture to me.

I don't even know Rubens as an artist, I have no bias either way.

by Anonymousreply 32902/18/2019

[quote] The actor, 51, had faced charges stemming from a 2001 search of his Los Angeles house, during which police said they found materials that appeared to depict children engaged in sexual activity. [bold] In a press release, Reubens’s Los Angeles-based rep, Kelly Bush, said the alleged improper images were from his “extensive historical art photography collection.” [/bold]

by Anonymousreply 33002/18/2019

Just stop r330.....it was determined they werent child porn so give it a rest.

by Anonymousreply 33102/18/2019

r331, my apologies, the intention of my comment was to show that there was no child porn in question, just some art pictures.

by Anonymousreply 33202/18/2019

r324, you're wrong. DG had an 18-year old boyfriend in 2012, when he was 69; it made national headlines. Besides, he may publicly hook up with boys 18 and over, but we have no idea what he (or many other of these guys) does in their private lives. It could just be they're smart enough to be more discreet than Singer (whose pictures with his prepubescent looking boytoys are all over the Internet. Dumbass).

by Anonymousreply 33302/18/2019

Geffen's 18-year-old bf was a buff football player, not a skinny twink or a guy who looked barely pubescent

by Anonymousreply 33402/18/2019

Who cares how 18-year-olds look? They have the same level of maturity, and it's far lower than that of a 25 year old.

by Anonymousreply 33502/18/2019

Isn't that other gay director that Singer hangs/hung out with rumored to be a pervert too?

by Anonymousreply 33602/19/2019

"A pervert", jesus. What board is this again?

"eeeek, gay men!"

by Anonymousreply 33702/19/2019

So sorry R337 how dare anyone suggest kid touchers are perverts!

by Anonymousreply 33802/19/2019

R335, of course it’s relevant. If you like big, beefy, corn fed football types, you likely are not secretly yearning for scrawny underaged boys. If you like guys who LOOK underaged, it’s much more likely that you’ve pursued actual underaged boys.

by Anonymousreply 33902/19/2019

Beefy underaged boys are a thing though R339

by Anonymousreply 34002/19/2019

Has he no projects? The guy isn't over, whether Mary! likes it or not.

by Anonymousreply 34102/19/2019

Geoffrey Jones and Paul Rubens were harassed about boys...I don't remember if there was any truth to it.

by Anonymousreply 34202/19/2019

Never heard that one R333 — that does put him in a different light.

by Anonymousreply 34302/19/2019

Have to admit, the timing of The Atlantic piece was brilliant. If it came out before the Oscar noms, Bo-Rhap probably wouldn't have gotten the nod as Best Picture and people would view that as enough punishment for Singer. If it came out after the Oscars aired, people would've already moved on.

Instead it came out between the Oscar noms and the Oscars airing -- after Bo-Rhap got a Best Picture nod and four other nominations, ensuring the movie (and thus, Bryan Singer) would be talked about incessantly for a month. That magnified the spotlight on Singer and made it hard for Hollywood to just brush it under the rug. In hindsight it seems like it was the perfect strategy to finally take him down.

The funny thing is, you don't see his paid hacks coming on here to defend him as much anymore. I'm guessing after the back-to-back slams of the GLAAD rescind, the BAFTA diss, and the Red Sonja shoot being canceled for the year, he realized it was a waste of time and called the dogs off. Then again, he has more time on his hands so maybe he'll back on here to defend himself, lol.

DL has long waited for this day.

by Anonymousreply 34402/19/2019

Well most of the other metoo culprits who have attempted a comeback botched it; I think Bryan Singer's attempt will be just as bad.

As Dominick Dunne said about OJ after the Not Guilty verdict, now OJ will see "how white people riot." The A-List and even B-List talent won't associate themselves with him for fear of their own careers. They - and we - all know there may be literally hundreds of boytoys who may, conceivably pop out of the woodwork for decades, destroying any project he touches - hell, the project may not even be insurable with his name attached.

by Anonymousreply 34502/19/2019

r345, you bring up an interesting point. With the amount of boys Singer has fooled around with over 20 years, you just know there are more abuse stories waiting in the wings. I mean, it's not like he can pay all those guys off, right? And the fallout from The Atlantic piece probably gives them more courage to come out, because unlike what Singer threatened, now they know that people will believe them. Karma really is a bitch.

by Anonymousreply 34602/19/2019

I’d love for this to be true and us to be rid of Singer, but I’m telling you he will find a way back. He always does.

by Anonymousreply 34702/19/2019

Dominick Dunno was a racist pig...I read his books but I never liked him.

Has Singer been arrested yet? If not, maybe you witch hunters should just leave him alone?

by Anonymousreply 34802/19/2019

Oooh! Singer fools around! Well I never have!

by Anonymousreply 34902/19/2019

Rumors, rumors, rumors...people are not convicted by rumor.

by Anonymousreply 35002/19/2019

Personally, if they were my boys I would ask them one thing...were they wanting to have sex? Because my mother wanted me to take responsibility for my own actions. And please do not tell me these boys did not know what they wanted...these kids are not retards.

by Anonymousreply 35102/19/2019

r350 DL is a gossip site, not a court of law.

by Anonymousreply 35202/19/2019

And just like that, Singer and his trolls are back!

by Anonymousreply 35302/20/2019

If gossip convicted people, we might all be in jail.

by Anonymousreply 35402/20/2019

Aren't we r354?

by Anonymousreply 35502/20/2019

r351 You'd ask them and then you would cover your ears, I bet.

Two men have already claimed he forcefully raped them.

by Anonymousreply 35602/20/2019

It's true that nobody gets charged based on rumors, but when victims come forward legal procedure starts. Of course the same shills who insist that rumors do not convict people will switch to doing their best victim shaming (these hos were asking for it!).

by Anonymousreply 35702/20/2019

"Because my mother wanted me to take responsibility for my own actions."

Your mom should tell Bryan to take responsibility for his own actions

by Anonymousreply 35802/20/2019

R351 He is a violent rapist so your point is moot.

by Anonymousreply 35902/20/2019

Is it just me, or is it strange that Duncan Roy hasn't said anything since more allegations have come out about Singer? No peep in 2017, none in 2018 with news of the impending Esquire article, and none now in 2019. He was very vocal about the accusations in 2014, but now studiously avoid it.

I'm thinking Singer's people offered him a huge payout to keep his mouth shut. It worked for many of the boys he raped, so why not?

And still no word from/about Michael Egan.....

by Anonymousreply 36002/20/2019

"Is it just me, or is it strange that Duncan Roy hasn't said anything since more allegations have come out about Singer?"

Based on his blog, he comes across as a self-loathing piece of shit, ranting about "gays" - who cares what he thinks?

by Anonymousreply 36102/21/2019

BREAKING => Fascinating article detailing the process The Atlantic journalists had to go through to research the Bryan Singer article and the resistance they faced from Esquire. Makes it all the clear Singer was being protected at high levels. Even more disturbing is that there were more sordid stories they weren't able to include in the final piece.

by Anonymousreply 36202/23/2019

No wonder Singer managed to get away for so long. Given An Open Secret and Gabe Hoffman aren’t mentioned anywhere in the process, the writers presumably found their story without them despite Hoffman’s claims to the contrary. Or they were excluded after legal took a look at them. Either way, thank goodness Singer can’t hide anymore.

by Anonymousreply 36302/23/2019

Huh. BR won every award but Best Picture it was nominated for. The one award Singer could benefit from and he got properly fucked over. Yes!

by Anonymousreply 36402/24/2019

Hey Bryan, in case you or your paid shills are reading this, so sorry you weren't mentioned tonight any of the FOUR TIMES Bohemian Rhapsody won.

Maybe if you hadn't raped so many boys and led Brad Renfro to his death, you could have had a night of glory -- maybe even won an Oscar!

Instead, you sat at home, probably in a coke-addled haze while raping another underage kid to take your mind off the pain.

KARMA IS A MOTHERFUCKIN' BITCH, isn't it? She may arrive late but she always gets there.

by Anonymousreply 36502/24/2019

I love this tweet.

by Anonymousreply 36602/24/2019

Has he collapsed yet?

by Anonymousreply 36702/25/2019

“Sir Ian McKellen says he is “waiting for someone to accuse” him of sexual misconduct in the wake of allegations against director Bryan Singer and actor Kevin Spacey.”——-==========McKellen blames the CLOSET for their downfall!!?—========——->>”With the couple of names you’ve mentioned, people I’ve worked with, both of them were in the closet,” he said. “And hence all their problems as people and their relationships with other people, if they had been able to be open about themselves and their desires, they wouldn’t have started abusing people in the way they’ve been accused.”===========Sit down Felicia!

by Anonymousreply 36802/25/2019

R368 I kind of get what he means, being in the closet isn’t healthy for a sexual outlet......but girl stop. You in danger sweetie. That’s not a smart thing to say now, even if there is a tiny bit of truth to it.

by Anonymousreply 36902/25/2019

If you are having sex with 14 year old boys——allegedly——That has nothing to do with the closet. That’s a perversion.

by Anonymousreply 37002/25/2019

^^Singer looks so creepy in that photo. It's like he's fantasizing about all the abuse he can get away with due to being rich.

by Anonymousreply 37102/25/2019

I hate to say this because I love Sir Ian.....but he sounds senile. For one, Singer wasn't in the closet.

by Anonymousreply 37202/25/2019

R372 not true. Singer only came ‘out’ in what 2014? After what, 2 decades , of raping boys. Plus he came out as bi (not gay, which is what he is) and then quickly had a child with a woman; one which they tried to push as his partner. That was proven to be false.

So he has been closeted, and even some what so after technically ‘coming out’

by Anonymousreply 37302/25/2019

"Singer only came ‘out’ in what 2014?"

He was always out, that was just the first time he said it in an interview. Go listen to the Kevin Pollak interview about Kevin Spacey stealing Bryan Singer's bf on the set of The Usual Suspects. He says Bryan wasn't hiding his sexuality from anyone.

by Anonymousreply 37402/26/2019

If he were a violent rapist, wouldn't he have been arrested? Did this just happen a couple of months ago?

by Anonymousreply 37502/26/2019

"If he were a violent rapist, wouldn't he have been arrested?"

It took decades to get Cosby behind bars

by Anonymousreply 37602/26/2019

r375, it also took Harvey Weinstein decades to get arrested. You paid Singer shills have such terrible, transparently idiotic logic

by Anonymousreply 37702/26/2019

Also, let's not even talk about how many rapes go unreported/never see a day in court.

by Anonymousreply 37802/26/2019

R374 that’s not out. That’s like saying a married guy who goes and gets his ass fucked at the sauna is ‘out’. Back then you HAD to publically say it otherwise you were treated as straight by the media. I mean there are celebs who have long term relationships with he same sex, but are still ‘closeted’.

Ya dumb

by Anonymousreply 37902/26/2019

But Singer had every option to just be himself as soon as he was a grown man in Hollywood. A director! Not an actor. However closeted actors, even if forced into the closet, also don't need to rape boys, it's easier to be discreet with adult boyfriends and fuck buddies than with goddamn Singer pool parties anyway.

Sir Ian's catholic priest theory really doesn't seem to fit Singer very well.

by Anonymousreply 38002/26/2019

Bryan Singer gets a shout out—————>“Time's not up: Bryan Singer's shadow loomed over last night's Oscars, showing Hollywood hasn't changed”———I agree.... Until handcuffs are on Pedophiles in Hollywood, nothing has changed....

by Anonymousreply 38102/26/2019

“Stranger Things' Star Finn Wolfhard Fires Agent Over Former Actor's Sexual Abuse Claim“——-But no arrests?....Where else—-except the Vatican——is this ignored?

by Anonymousreply 38202/26/2019

"that’s not out. That’s like saying a married guy who goes and gets his ass fucked at the sauna is ‘out’. Back then you HAD to publically say it otherwise you were treated as straight by the media."

Huh? He had a boyfriend on the set and wasn't hiding it from anyone. That's not the same as someone who has gay sex on the downlow while presenting a straight face to the world. Directors aren't like actors, they aren't constantly photographed out on the town and don't usually give interviews talking about their personal lives.

Ya dumb.

by Anonymousreply 38302/26/2019

R383 He was not publicly known to be bi then & he still hasn’t come out as gay. A celeb not hiding the fact that he’s fucking men from people in his immediate vicinity is not the same as being publicly out. Stop calling people dumb when you’re the one who can’t get this through your thick skull.

by Anonymousreply 38402/27/2019

r384, you are the dumb one. Most directors aren't household names - even ones who direct hit movies - and they aren't "celebrities" the way actors are. Stop pretending he was this tortured, closeted guy when he was introducing his boyfriends to everyone he knew

by Anonymousreply 38502/27/2019

R385 No one said he was tortured but he is still in fact closeted as a gay (not bi) man. I’m moving on from this tangent since you simply refuse to accept what “coming out” means for public figures.

by Anonymousreply 38602/27/2019

New York Post takes aim at Hearst for passing on the Bryan Singer Expose———>>‘Hearst began drawing new fire this week after a report that detailed that it was indeed Hearst Magazines President Troy Young and Chief Content Officer Kate Lewis who killed a story on the alleged predatory sexual behavior of Bryan Singer, director of the Oscar-nom­inated “Bohemian Rhapsody,” that was originally intended to run in Esquire”

by Anonymousreply 38702/27/2019

‘It’s revolting that Bryan Singer wasn’t mentioned at the Oscars——Hollywood’s inability to address the predator in its midst speaks to the industry’s broad hypocrisy about the injustice it purports to combat.”.......Uh, Rami——I think they mean YOU among others...

by Anonymousreply 38802/27/2019

Idiotic article. Only if you are a moron you thought it weird that Singer wasn't mentioned. "I want to thank everyone who made this film possible. If anyone who was involved in this film allegedly raped any kids, than that's really sad though!"

by Anonymousreply 38902/27/2019

^^LOL. Just imagined Rami saying that.

by Anonymousreply 39002/27/2019

Bye, Bryan!

by Anonymousreply 39103/14/2019

Ding dong, the predator's gone. He can focus on his underage home movies now.

by Anonymousreply 39203/14/2019

All the articles reporting on his firing sourced an article in The Hollywood Reporter. Interestingly, that article was not about Bryan Singer. It was about Kevin Tsujihara. Singer's firing is mentioned in a throwaway line in one paragraph:

"Lerner made news recently when he hired Bryan Singer to direct a reboot of Red Sonja. After Singer was accused in an Atlantic magazine article of sexually assaulting underaged boys, Lerner dismissed the story as "agenda-driven fake news," then walked the statement back. Eventually, he dropped Singer from the project because he was unable to secure a domestic distributor."

If you wanted further proof that THR's coverage is designed to protect Singer at all costs, now you have it.

by Anonymousreply 39303/14/2019

Reading that hideous article about that bimbo and her demands and how, as usual, there is no Accountability because she was diagnosed with that convenient form of autism as a child... all of it makes me more determined than ever to encourage the gay community not to fall into the same fuck and snitch pattern. And to stop with the moral pearl clutching disingenuous bullshit that comes with it all. We are better than that. Leave that behavior to idiot women like the one at R393 (and the idiot men who fall for it in the name of pussy).

by Anonymousreply 39403/15/2019

I guess r394 would rather fall for misogynist right-wing talking points

by Anonymousreply 39503/15/2019

I guess R395 would rather have women portrayed as helpless little lambs who need our protection from the big bad wolves since they can't make a single decision on their own.

by Anonymousreply 39603/16/2019

Right-wingers like r396 think men are helpless and frail and need our protection - that's why they support MRA types.

by Anonymousreply 39703/16/2019
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Don't you just LOVE clicking on these things on every single site you visit? I know we do! You can thank the EU parliament for making everyone in the world click on these pointless things while changing absolutely nothing. If you are interested you can take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT and we'll set a dreaded cookie to make it go away. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed


recent threads by topic delivered to your email

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!