New Orleans is love and hate. You can love aspects of it, but it takes blinders. It's just as easy to hate. Americans like to take their European friends there saying it's perhaps the most European in feel of U.S. cities; Europeans often react badly to the amusement park quality, the drunkenness and loudness of the place, and its despair (all the people who made the leap of their dreams from some little asswipe town in Texas or Georgia to New Orleans and then worked in a cockring shop for 30 years, living in a falling apartment addition at the back of some shotgun house in Algiers, no health insurance, no money in the bank, just a job selling cockrings and a pasttime of all day Saturday BBQ happy hour at some shitty where they used to get their dicks sucked. It's a city of failed dreams and dreams that were too small.
Copenhagen is not a place I hated. It seems it would be a good place to live, but to visit it was one of the few cities I found underwhelming. Stockholm, on the other hand, seems less favored than Copenhagen but is a vastly better and more interesting city for me; and quite beautiful where Copenhagen is just okay, like a city where you know you are near the good part yet never arrive.
Berlin is an ugly city, oddly scaled and disjointed, but with brilliant parts, and again I think one important consideration is that it's both a good city to visit and a good city to live in, but ultimately a city that reveals its charms to residents.
Belfast is fairly unlovable, so disjointed and too often ugly. The effort of trying to make or keep together a city of what's there to work with is too evident everywhere. There are some wonderful Victorian buildings, but it's not a cohesive place, with few parts that are leafy and pleasant or dense and complex. I would like to like it, but it's for a stopover passing through to somewhere better.
Antwerp I didn't love. It's interesting, but broken apart and rather impenetrable. Would be better to live there than to visit, but I would grow tired of it very fast. It makes me appreciate Brussels and its citizens (make of that what you will.)
Brighton is hard to love despite many ingredients for success. In the end it's too scruffy and third-rate and downtrodden. A little more prosperity would do the place some good (not that it's an especially cheap place to buy, but all the grand architecture has been cut up into pie-shaped sections of shoeboxes and cardboard construction now fifty years old or so.)
Los Angeles can be okay for a quick visit but it's an awful place: amazing, lush landscaping everywhere yet you are never far at all from some shitty stretch of motels and commercial buildings of dubious interest to its neighbors. The car culture is grotesque. Nothing is about where you are but rather to getting to someplace where you or not (geographically, metaphorically, etc.) The architecture is by turns, flashy, tacky, shoddy, amusingly off target stylistically, and temporary looking; new buildings look like they won't last, old buildings you wonder how and why they hung on so long without any evident redeeming value. There are some nice patches, but all in all rather awful. And the people worse.
Las Vegas is lovable for a whirlwind 24 hour stay to see everything nonstop and then get the fuck out; the lovability clock runs out very swfitly. It is awful, of course, without almost no redeeming quality but for the garishness of a peacock in night display, but seeing it all in a flash is a strange and amazing acid trip thing.
There are loads of places in the U.S. I've never been for reasons of knowing myself well and knowing I would not like them. Europe I have found every place interesting at least, a couple mentioned in curious ways, and excepting a few ugly industrial towns that can be found anywhere, never with any recommendation to see them.