Asking if he is claiming sexual harassment, why did he send me nude photos of himself?
Bruce Weber HITS BACK At Accuser - By Releasing His NUDE Photos!
by Anonymous | reply 60 | February 6, 2019 6:35 AM |
TeamBruce
by Anonymous | reply 1 | January 5, 2019 4:10 PM |
So Weber's admitting to being a closet case?
by Anonymous | reply 2 | January 5, 2019 4:11 PM |
We all are a little bit whore, no?
by Anonymous | reply 3 | January 5, 2019 4:12 PM |
I knew when #MeToo became big, a bunch of failed actors, actresses, and models who resorted to the casting couch of their own volition (and in this case, at their own insistence) would seek revenge by claiming to be victims.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | January 5, 2019 4:30 PM |
Fuck! I can't believe trolls like Weber can get good dick. Do I think Weber is a perv, absolutely.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | January 5, 2019 4:34 PM |
Except this guy is a model who is hoping Weber will photograph him.
Are the photos to show what a great model he is or to have sex?
by Anonymous | reply 6 | January 5, 2019 4:34 PM |
[quote] Fuck! I can't believe trolls like Weber can get good dick.
When you have POWER you can get anything.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | January 5, 2019 4:34 PM |
[quote] Except this guy is a model who is hoping Weber will photograph him.
If the model was serious he would set up an account on Model Mayhem, do a portfolio and send Weber the link - that would be the professional way to do it
by Anonymous | reply 8 | January 5, 2019 4:37 PM |
I have no sympathy for Bruce Weber. A trollish pig taking advantage of his power in order to bed hot guys is being taken to the cleaners. No one saw that coming ! *sarcasm*
Play with fire...
by Anonymous | reply 9 | January 5, 2019 4:50 PM |
Weber releases images sent to himi. Depending on where he lives, that’s likely going to land him in deep shit under “Revenge Porn” laws.
Had he consulted with his attorney, he would have submitted those images with the complete forensic records of the text message to demonstrate who established contact with dates and times to undermine statements by the plaintiff. Now he’s undercut himself.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | January 5, 2019 5:58 PM |
Model = dumb. Spell your career maker's name correctly!
by Anonymous | reply 11 | January 5, 2019 6:05 PM |
[quote] that’s likely going to land him in deep shit under “Revenge Porn” laws.
But there is no nudity, and the one nude shot they blurred the private parts out
by Anonymous | reply 12 | January 5, 2019 6:11 PM |
Male models make very little money except in the rare cases that they land a major campaign. The entire male model “industry” is a form of sexual harassment. Recruiters go after hot boys with promises of money, travel and glamour. Agents send the boys to photographers who don’t pay them for posing semi-naked or fully naked in order to get “exposure.” Then the photos are published online. The whole system is a way for envious gays to figuratively (and in a few cases literally) get into the pants of the otherwise unobtainable straight jocks they lusted after in high school.
Works for me.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | January 5, 2019 6:15 PM |
And yet none of this would excuse what Weber is accused of doing. He's a model, if he was requested to send nudes he would've. It doesn't give Weber the right to then harass him. Of course, the ugly side of DL always comes out with stories like this as posters try to avoid re-assessing their own past behaviour and insist instead that this is all fine.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | January 5, 2019 6:18 PM |
r14, absolutely. There is a contingent of DLers who will always completely ignore the behavior of harassers, even when there are multiple (dozens) of allegations. Pathetic, and makes you wonder how many predators/would-be predators are lurking on DL.
I can't wait to see the evidence Weber provides for the over 20 men who have accused him. Considering how long it took him to release these photos, guessing he doesn't have it.
Regardless of whether the victims receive justice or not, I'm happy to know his reputation has been stained forever and he will go out in disgrace. Well deserved.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | January 5, 2019 6:23 PM |
"Pathetic, and makes you wonder how many predators/would-be predators are lurking on DL."
I've thought that before about replies to other threads, R15.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | January 5, 2019 6:31 PM |
It's not a question of sympathy for Weber. Extortion by lie is going to become more common.
Lost in all of this will be real victims who were forced to submit.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | January 5, 2019 6:31 PM |
it would help weber to be more likable if he was not such an arrogant disgusting pig. who hides behind his marriage to some dyke. such a fraud
by Anonymous | reply 18 | January 5, 2019 6:34 PM |
It's a clear case of a failed model looking for a paycheck
by Anonymous | reply 19 | January 5, 2019 6:35 PM |
Yes, R19.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | January 5, 2019 6:36 PM |
Lacks verificatia of sizemeat.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | January 5, 2019 6:39 PM |
R8, Model Mayhem is not a professional site. I work in the modeling world and Model Mayhem is a joke.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | January 5, 2019 6:40 PM |
Big deal, this guy wanted to model and he knew showing the goods might be part of it. Besides, he is only one of around 20 that came forward. Is Weber going to try and character assassinate all of them now?
by Anonymous | reply 23 | January 5, 2019 6:44 PM |
The real problem here is that we aren't going to get clear pix...
by Anonymous | reply 24 | January 5, 2019 6:47 PM |
Exactly, r23
by Anonymous | reply 25 | January 5, 2019 6:51 PM |
R23 There might be a couple legit cases but then you get people like this who want to tag along hoping they'll get a settlement out of it without people looking to see if the case is actually factual.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | January 5, 2019 6:51 PM |
AM i the only one on this sige that came here hoping for nude pictures of BRUCE WEBER?
by Anonymous | reply 27 | January 5, 2019 6:57 PM |
[quote]AM i the only one on this sige that came here hoping for nude pictures of BRUCE WEBER?
It's a thread about Bruce Weber, not DL fave Tom Bianchi.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | January 5, 2019 7:00 PM |
R28. NO. i did not say just nude pictures i said BRUCE WEBER NUDE.........i love his rolly polly body, it makes me very wet
by Anonymous | reply 29 | January 5, 2019 7:03 PM |
why is this site always shaming FATTIES? FATTIES LIVES MATTER........TOO!!
by Anonymous | reply 30 | January 5, 2019 7:04 PM |
Does nobody (OP, R10) bother to read the links anymore. Bruce Weber's LAWYER submitted the pics as part of a legal proceeding. But, by all means, continue to rant about stuff you're completely ignorant of.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | January 5, 2019 7:14 PM |
LOCK 'IM UP!
by Anonymous | reply 32 | January 5, 2019 7:21 PM |
[quote][R28]. NO. i did not say just nude pictures i said BRUCE WEBER NUDE.........i love his rolly polly body, it makes me very wet
No one can be this dumb, so I must assume it's a poor attempt at humor.
Or at least I pray it is.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | January 5, 2019 7:23 PM |
/snging up for Kaplan Online Digital Photography and Advertising 3 months classes/
by Anonymous | reply 34 | January 5, 2019 7:23 PM |
Since it's almost certain few posters will bother reading the articles:
The model did not send Weber nudes. The model's agency did. And it's only after receiving the nudes that Weber agreed to shoot the model.
The messages the model did send were photos from his portfolio and messages like "Thank you Mr Webber! See you soon :-)". I'd like to know how the Weber defenders can claim that something like that proves the model wanted it.
I think this will backfire. If Weber truly was innocent, he wouldn't need to indulge in individual character assassination. And it all makes him look pathetic and sleazy.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | January 5, 2019 7:26 PM |
R36 Then why did Weber agree to shoot him in the first place?
by Anonymous | reply 37 | January 5, 2019 7:28 PM |
Nude is nude. Where 's the dick?
by Anonymous | reply 38 | January 5, 2019 7:40 PM |
[quote]If Weber truly was innocent, he wouldn't need to indulge in individual character assassination. And it all makes him look pathetic and sleazy.
While I hardly think Weber is an innocent babe in the woods, this logic is wholly flawed.
It should be: If Weber truly was GUILTY, the accuser would be able to prove it without character assassination. It's not up to Weber, not matter what a sleazebag he may or may not be, to prove he's innocent. It's for the accuser to prove he's guilty.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | January 5, 2019 7:54 PM |
20 guys saying he grabbed their junk ought to result in a nice settlement for each. settle quickly and it all goes away.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | January 5, 2019 7:59 PM |
R33=ANGRY OLD FATTIE
by Anonymous | reply 41 | January 5, 2019 8:01 PM |
Pic search Jason Boyce - dozens and dozens of sleazy shots over many years. He doesn't seem like a fashion model in the least. He's got a strange face and body, as well.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | January 5, 2019 8:10 PM |
no no no. i dont want to turn over in bed and see that monster face looking at me. now way. i dont care how hot the body is
by Anonymous | reply 43 | January 5, 2019 8:12 PM |
R39 20 models making accusations isn't character assassination. Weber picking out one and presenting out of context messages is an attempt at character assassination.
R42 Search for any model and you'll find sleazier shots. It's how they all have to get started and build a portfolio and so need to take whatever shoots they can, which gives far too much power to the like of the Webers, which makes them think they can get away with their harassment.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | January 5, 2019 8:14 PM |
Is this model yet another straight guy attempting to scam a gay guy for money because no one will hire his ugly ass for anything?
[quote] Search for any model and you'll find sleazier shots. It's how they all have to get started and build a portfolio
Not really. The shots of him naked and of the body are to compensate for his washed out, unremarkable face.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | January 5, 2019 8:34 PM |
78% of DLers conflate "fitness models", Instawhore nobodies, and fashion models.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | January 5, 2019 8:37 PM |
I just don’t understand how if you know Bruce Weber deals in hot male nude men with very homoerotic subtext and you know that he has a reputation and that you know as a Model you are effectively selling your looks , how you become surprised when he cracks onto you.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | January 5, 2019 8:51 PM |
[quote][R39] 20 models making accusations isn't character assassination. Weber picking out one and presenting out of context messages is an attempt at character assassination.
Unless there is a cum soaked blue dress, it doesn't matter whether 20 or 200 people make accusations. It's still he said/he said. The only support for these people is their credibility. If Weber needs to defend himself, of course he has to impugn that credibility.
As for 20 people making a claim - all of whom have a financial incentive to make it - I'd say that there are numerous instances of many people making multiple false claims. From the McMartin preschool fiasco to Obama's birth certificate, you can always find people who will make unfounded accusations.
I doubt that Weber is completely innocent. I'm sure many models both offered and were solicited for sexual favors in exchange for career assistance.
But, we have got to get back to some sanity when it comes to guilt by accusation.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | January 5, 2019 9:39 PM |
R47 The whole point is many likely never heard of Weber. They were sent to him by their agents. Likewise with women models being sent to the likes of Terry Richardson. But hey, you keep trying to blame the victims.
Something needs to be done about these agencies and middlemen who are basically acting like pimps.
R48 And he hasn't impugned their credibility. He's gone after one person, and failed to actually do any damage except with people who don't pay attention. The model didn't send Weber the naked pics. And the messages he sent were hardly salacious. The fact that Weber is submitting this as some kind of proof that the model knew what he was getting into says far more about Weber than the model.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | January 5, 2019 10:41 PM |
[quote]It's a clear case of a failed model looking for a paycheck
NO. If anything Weber releasing those pics, with text that does not even allude to sex, makes his case even more difficult.
Weber is not liked around business. Ain't nobody is going to come out to help him.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | January 5, 2019 10:53 PM |
[quote]how you become surprised when he cracks onto you.
It is still not an invitation to sex which is what the lawsuit states.
If you were invited to touch an individual, by all mean go ahead. If you weren't, you ass is in trouble.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | January 5, 2019 11:08 PM |
Look how desperate the agent "DT" looks for sending Weber those photos.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | January 13, 2019 8:21 AM |
Shouldn't the thread title be CLAPS BACK?
by Anonymous | reply 53 | January 13, 2019 3:31 PM |
One of the creepiest aspects of Datalounge is how many people (and it may just be one or two hyperactive posters) defend sleazes like Kevin Spacey and Bruce Weber.
Weber is a fucking pedophile.
Go read or watch "Chop Suey" --it's like the N@MBLA handbook on how to seduce a teenager.
20 guys have sued him.
The fashion industry loves him because with his bizarre pretense of being a married heterosexual, he's managed to make homoerotic imagery mainstream.
Although my teenage jerkoff fantasies owe him big time for his fetishization of armpit hair. Those A&F catalogs were for guys my age what International Male must have been for EGs.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | January 13, 2019 3:44 PM |
And FWIW, sending Weber nude photos is not the same as saying "fondle my cock when I'm telling you not to do that"
by Anonymous | reply 55 | January 13, 2019 3:45 PM |
Good, fight back, guys. This gay panic witch hunt shit has to stop. And shame on any cunt on DL that enjoys this trial by internet crap.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | January 13, 2019 3:55 PM |
[quote] Weber is a fucking pedophile.
Show proof that Weber went after a pre-puberty child, R54.
JFC, some posters these days don’t seem to even know what “pedo” actually means.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | February 6, 2019 5:57 AM |
[quote] I can't wait to see the evidence Weber provides for the over 20 men who have accused him. Considering how long it took him to release these photos, guessing he doesn't have it.
That’s not how it works, R15. Weber isn’t the one who needs to prove anything or provide any “evidence”. He can, if he wants to, but that’s not obligatory.
It’s his accusers or the AG who MUST provide “evidence”. The obligation of proof is fully on them, not on Weber.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | February 6, 2019 6:06 AM |
I wonder if any of the "Broken Noses" boys are among the accusers?
by Anonymous | reply 59 | February 6, 2019 6:10 AM |
R54 is a real ingrate. If he's going to be like that, he should just return all those orgasms.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | February 6, 2019 6:35 AM |