Prince William's looks

A reminder of when he used to be gorgeous.

Part of the problem is how male aristocrats & royals wear their hair in the UM when they start to go bald.

For some reason they won't buzz their remaining hair which would make them look much younger and sexier; instead, they grow it out to about 3/4 of an inch, so they look eternally middle aged.

dat cock tho

He was always kinda horse-faced.

The Windsor genes beat the spencer genes

Who cares about his looks - he's got a huge, ummmm, 'thumb'.

That's the same nose William's always had -- it belonged to his mother. Unlike him, she eventually learned her angles and how to play it down.

How do you know @R6 ?

He was always delish as was his brother. Too bad William now looks 55 and Harry married to that rude negress.

The royals peak and lose their looks early. At least he had looks to lose, unlike some of the others.

Yep r4. His face hasn't actually changed much, you are just seeing the power of hair.

When he had those gorgeous locks it made him look pretty, without it he doesn't look pretty.

His son looks like pedo bait that is surely the reason why there are so many threads regarding this boring bunch of horse faced twats!

i think he is getting hotter again for whatever reason. i wish he would buff up his chest and arms tho. a little too spaghetti looking for me. harry on the other hand is on a sharp nose dive down the ugly hole.

They clearly extinguished as a result of having to pose 24/7 with that anorexic frau, she's sucked his youth. HE SHOULD HAVE CHOSEN MEEEE!

Wouldn't have fucked him either way...his smegma doesn't taste like caviar just because his royal.

Well, he's tall.

Is that all? Did you dance? Is he charming? They say that he's charming!

It's funny that all of the queen's children except Charles had their day when they were considered beautiful in the press and by the general public: Anne, Andrew, Edward. And they all hit the wall in their 30s and now are considered fairly hideous. And now so is William, and soon will be Harry.

Charles was never considered handsome, and yet he's probably aged the best of them all.

I think it's an excellent question. He was a dream. Someone posted pictures of his uncles, Andrew and the other one. They were good looking too. It's a shame they lose their looks.

I'd still munch that taint, I wonder if he's lost his hair down there too...

The crown jewels.

A lot of people lose their looks. William just did it very quickly and it seems at a much younger age. Plus, he seems like a moody, pain in the arse which doesn't help giving him a break.

R20, Fake pic. Will's penis is intact.

Brotherly love.

Those nudes are two of the worst photoshopped pcitures I've ever seen,

At page 20, William's torso is resting on what seem to be the legs of someone half his height.

Sorry: I mean, "at r20."

Is that all there is R20, to a sire?

He was very handsome when he had his hair, but I think more than anything, now he looks unhappy/stressed - whatever you want to call it. As a result, he looks pale, doughy and way older than he actually is. I can't imagine all this drama with Harry helps.

I saw a recent photo of William and Harry and what struck me the most was that they look nothing alike.

And I agree with OP, it's not just the loss of hair with Prince William. I don't see any trace of the handsomeness from his youth.

I honestly don't think he looks bad. Kate can sometimes look kind of hard and angular, but she sure takes great photos. Including this one.

why are his teeth so bad.

Women like Kate suck all the hotness and beauty from everyone around them: husbands, children, etc.

She is an evil succubus vampire.

In the Royal Cunting Sweepstakes, I'm on Team Meghan.

PS: Kate looks way older and more hagged-out than she should for her age.

R31 except harry has gotten a lot uglier and skinnier in the past year or so. those windsor genes are really starting to kick in.

R28. William ought to stop smiling or squinting. He shouldn't have such pronounced crows feet at his age.

He was always a toad just like daddy. It must really piss-off the ginger haters that Harry turned out to be the beautiful one.

The Meh-gan freak (R31&R32) has finally found this thread ...

They have all hit a wall--Wills, Harry, Kate, and Megs. In recent photos, all look very ordinary, miserable, and most of them quite a bit older than their age, like cracked bone china.

Meghan never looked royal or pretty, she will always be a DARK stain in the house of Windsor's legacy!

Definitely not photoshopped.

R38, you're just a troll, probably the Meh-gan lunatic.

From another thread: >>Their modus operandi is to spam the thread with photos of Blackamoor jewelry. Later, they return to use their own posts as evidence of "racism" on our thread.<<

R38 is doing exactly the same.

Looking at those photos of Will and Kate upthread, one word came to mind "dry" - they look DRY - are they drinkers?

Part of it is also "married straight guy with kids who quit trying to BE hot" syndrome, part of it is the British Monarchy's weird sense of what constitutes royal dignity. Other royals (esp. northern Europe) act more like reality-show celebs & actively work at looking good as they age.

R39 very nice.

Kate is a pretty lucky lady.

I believe it's called "dad bod".

R41 just wait till that ignorant piece of trash pops out a half breed brat, they look even drier!!!

The Windsors have always been big drinkers. I don't think they even try to deny it.

Most of us have no idea how boring and sad the life of a Royal is.

Can you freaks shut up about Meghan? We know you're all assholes who hate her for no good reason other than you're racist and you also probably torture puppies for fun. This thread is about how terrible Prince William looks. Stay on topic for once, freaks.

I would definitely still suck his dick though.

anne's husband sir timothy laurence is hot

I still can't believe how far his looks fell, how fast. I've never seen anything like it in someone who wasn't seriously ill or a major drug abuser.

He was unbelievably gorgeous as a young man:

Serious Ralph Lauren model type:

What a great picture at r1 ! How old was he then, I wonder ?

Take his hair away from those pics r50/r51, imagine him with the hair he has now.

People really underestimate how much the hair can make the man.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

The hair is a major factor, but there's now a doughiness to his face and body. His jowels sag a bit.

His father still has hair! Why did this happen to him; JFC.

The male pattern baldness is inherited from the maternal side, so look to Diana's father.

OP, genes and married life.

He also strikes me as a genuinely unhappy man. The type that is never satisfied with anything, just like his dearly departed mum.

I don’t believe that any of these people truly enjoy the monarchy. They probably enjoy the lifestyle, minus the obligations.

He probably believes he could be doing something better with his life, but isn’t.

That blond mop he had on his head in his youth hid a thousand flaws. He also had a rosy complexion. That fair translucent glow he had that made him such a hottie in some folks' eyes is also a liability when he ages. And he has a cue ball for a head now, and like so many people from the UK, his teeth are so yellow and stained from tea.

His alleged maternal Grandfather Sir James Goldsmith might give a better clue than Earl Spencer to his hairline.

[quote]I don’t believe that any of these people truly enjoy the monarchy

William has never hid how he doesn't enjoy the monarchy. He often gets attacked for how much he avoids royal duties. Hell, Harry just openly said it

[quote]“Is there any one of the royal family who wants to be king or queen? I don’t think so, but we will carry out our duties at the right time.”

I'll be Queen just give me the fucking tiara!

What's the point of monarchies nowadays? What real purpose do they serve in a so-called constitutional monarchy? Lichtenstein and Luxembourg, the monarchs actually have some political power, but the other countries don't...so what do they actually do?

Its better when William has his glasses on . He looks definitely better with them .

Officially they play a ceremonial role in society as the head of the state r63. That is why they go to so many functions to smile and wave.

The history of the British monarchy also means they serve as an important tourist attraction. People care about them, and that generates its own industry.

R63: Impartial head of state. A figure the country can rally around without political baggage. Here, we have to rally to W or Trump. Over there you can rally to the Queen in times of crisis while still detesting the Prime Minister. Here we're supposed to unite behind any detestable figure in the office of the Presidency. So there is something to it.

r30, those are good teeth for a Brit. You're just not used to the dazzling white that the Americans desire.

He just needs to lose a bit of weight and get some sun, and he'll be attractive again. Very few British men age well. Cary Elwes still looks good, now that he's lost weight.

Look at his Dad, asshole. He was never that goodlooking anyway. Leave the guy alone...shallow idiot.

William is apparently moody and kind of a prick in private.

Prince Charles was a cute kid who grew up to be an unattractive man. William was a cute teenager who grew up to be an unattractive man. Now, Harry is the same.

I don't think William and Harry ever got over what they see as the paparazzi-caused death of their mother and then having to play out their grief in public due to the monarchy oligations r69.

At least when Harry spoke about it, you could still hear how bitter he was about it.

I don't think a buzz cut would help, he is just one of those men who don't look good with short hair/bald

Harry still looks good for now.

Jude Law in contrast still looks beautiful even pushing 50 and mostly bald.

William looks about as good as the average 50 year old rich white male. How old is he anyway? 47 or so?

Do you remember Diana gushing about how gorgeous William was?

Agree (R41), they definitely look dry. Kate particularly has looked a little haggard for quite a while - both she and her sister seemed to age young. Her face never looks like it has any buoyancy or freshness/vibrancy to it, just dry and sallow-ish, even before having children. Of course that could well be to do with an extreme diet - she's been thin since before she married William, seemed to get thinner after and bounced back straight away after having children. If she's not getting enough fat or nutrients that would affect it I imagine, plus all the pressure of being in the public eye.

Yes, R74. He WAS gorgeous . . . when she was alive.

Isn't Kate a secret smoker? She looks like a smoker.

Prince Charles had some years where he looked good.

English people, in general, just don't age well. The pale skin gets sun-damaged early.

That would explain it (R77). They probably spend the every evening drinking and smoking while an army of nannies put the kids to bed.

[quote] William looks about as good as the average 50 year old rich white male. How old is he anyway? 47 or so?

He is 36.

Charles with beard

Charles was ugly

I think that all of the younger royals smoked when they were younger (Harry until recently). I'd guess Kate gave up when she became pregnant with George. But I know that some women start again as soon as they have given birth.

But was he fugly?

The prince and the show-biz girl.

R86 Interesting historical photo. Is Barb's nose different or just captured at a unique angle?

Can you imagine the kid's honker if Barbra and Charles had mated?

....

Yes r84. William, Kate and Harry were all smokers. Though they have all supposedly given it up.

The hair was a huge loss, and he lost the dewy complexion, due not only to aging but probably to smoking and drinking as well. A bit of weight gain that also made him look jowly, and poof! Looks gone.

I agree that if he buzzed the head, lost some weight, and got a decent tan to hide the sallowness, he could look pretty good again.

Cute pic from Harry's 2nd birthday party.

do english men also not work out? william and harry both need a weight lifting regime to be less skinny

An interesting aside to Royals smoking is that all Crown Premises are exempt from the UK workplace smoking ban, that includes all Royal Palaces.

William and Harry don't have to do anything r93, who are they trying to impress?

These royals are starting to look like scones left in the oven too long.

Diana and to some extent The Duke of Edinburgh were the only real Royal fitness enthusiasts.

By college graduation, he lost it. Entered college a model, came out a Windsor. What a shame

It's not Windsor genes - more correctly it's Hanoverian genes.

R93, former Prime Minister John Major was big on fitness and put an emphasis on physical education programs. That's part of the reason the Brits have done so well in recent Olympics. The younger generation works out and you actually see a lot of fit people in London these days.

Or The National Lottery Fund put a lot of money into sporting facilities and health education. John Major's government did little but bicker and bitch about each other.

The heaviness in the lower face is a big part of the problem.

....that he's a privileged asshole is the rest of the problem

after a time, you can't hide that kind of shit....it oozes out

I know TONS of privileged assholes who are hot AF here in NYC.

As I said before he looks like his cousins the Goldsmith's. Diana's Mother Frances was having an affair with James Goldsmith around the time she was conceived.

It'd be a huge coincidence for them all to look so similar otherwise.

Maybe the problem is that he's a privileged asshole who doesn't enjoy his life. Being privileged and miserable must age one like a stick up the ass.

Surely, he has a lot of free time. He could hop on the treadmill?

I remember there were quite a few nude paparazzi pics of William from where he was changing that I can no longer find on Google search. There's also another one where he's taking a piss. Can't remember how old he was though.

He was beautiful, even if for a second.

[quote]He was beautiful, even if for a second.

I wonder if he thought that he'd never lose it.

R104, maybe to you they are. To anyone looking for real substance? Not so much. Time will tell on them, too. It comes for everyone.

He looks terrible for 36, it is not only the baldness. He has actual wrinkles and could pass for a bad 46. His wife looks older than her age too (she has an unfortunate mouth that has always made her look older). In comparison, Charles looked better for longer. Harry looks great though. I even find the balding spot hot (for now)

R31 and R75 should probably take into account that in the quite recent past Kate has endured three pregnancies during which she threw up many times every day and was treated for dehydration. If that wouldn't take it out of you, I don't know what would.

Diana was into fitness. She had a great body and worked at it. But so many of the other royals are into horses--riding them around in the countryside. Diana was not into the countryside or horses. But for the rest of them, it shows they're outdoorsy, but not particularly into fitness. Charles, William and Harry have all played polo occasionally, but again, it's not really a cardio workout. Now they all just watch the races at Ascot. And that's not much exercise.

He has the same face, it just turned more Windsory and horsey and not at all cute. I agree with the statement above. At least he had some hot years. His uncle Andrew was a hot young man. Also his grandfather.

His grandparents have big long noses. They were both attractive young people, however.

Philip

Phillip was a looker when he was young r116, Elizabeth never was considered an attractive girl. That's not her.

HRM wasn't a great beauty but she was attractive.

I wonder which of the men have huge cocks, if any of them? Young Philip with a huge wang would have been exciting.

Phillip also lost his looks quickly, but there was a time when he was dashing.

Phillip had a huge cock which the Queen reportedly couldn't get enough of.

"The Crown" originally had a scene that referred to Phillip being well endowed, though it was cut. I assume they must have written that for a reason.

Kate has always looked a bit haggard, mainly because of her obsessive dieting.

He needs to start wearing hats- he has an unfortunately shaped skull, which makes his face very oblong looking- the hair disguised that.

Anthony Armstrong-Jones was reportedly well endowed.

Were both the Windsor sisters size queens?

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

It must be the Danish ancestry on Phillip's side. They're usually well hung.

It's not the face you fuck, it's the fuck you face.

R127 None of them are all that attractive. Poor Charlotte is gonna grow up to look like Sarah Huckabee, isn't she? How did Harry manage to keep his hair?

True (R113), but as (R124) said, she's looked a bit haggard well before that. Her three pregnancies sound awful, but my sister was terribly ill for the whole nine months when she was pregnant and she now looks a bit tired like parents do, because of the baby, but not sallow like Kate.

I just feel like Kate's has been a bit too thin for years, not from an aesthetic point of view but from a health point of view, to a point where you can kind of tell she has to work really hard for it. I feel sorry for her for that, there must be a lot of pressure, but like (R124) I think it's the dieting that does it, that and probably not great genes in terms of ageing. Having three awful pregnancies can definitely age you but she looks undernourished if anything, in my opinion.

R131 Yes, the babies have sucked her dry. They literally suck the life out of some women. She has sacrificed her youth for her children, but maybe she loves them and it's worth it to her. Who knows? Trying to be a mother and trying to be perfect has ruined many girls.

I'm not sure his nose has changed size OP!

I actually think apart from Prince Carl of Sweden he is one of the sexiest male royals there is. Much sexier than Prince Harry .

Please. That chick has more than one nanny at the ready to take those kids off her hands whenever she likes. She had maids to do the cleaning and a chef to do the cooking. Don't try to front like Kate Cambridge is tired and worn out from all her wifely/motherly duties.

Buck would never have lost his hair or looks, as he inherited all my good genes.

“HRM”, r119? What does that mean?

Hate Ratchet Meghan

"Her Royal Majesty" - R119 marches to his own drum.

R130 "How did Harry manage to keep his hair?"

He didn't. Just like Will in a few more years he'll have a chrome dome.

I was referring to the physical making of the babies (R134)- three pregnancies with terrible illness all through each, then birthing them, before feeling the pressure to pop right back to her usual thin-ness, (R134) - breast-feeding too if she did it, which I imagine she may well have (breast-feeding is strongly correlated with social class in Britain, not sure if it's the same elsewhere), and I interpreted (R132)'s comments as somewhere along the same lines.

She literally made three people with her own body and was very ill each time, and for some women, as (R132) said, it does seem to suck the life out. The hands-on parenting (we don't actually know how much she does and how much nannies do - I would think she does far more than the Queen did with her children for example) is quite a separate thing.

William was hot for a few short years, now both are the male equivalent of butterfaces. They do have great figures though, tall and slim with great builds. Those they seemed to get in equal measure from Diana and Grampa Phillip.

For that reason they both looked great on Harry's wedding day in uniform. The hats helped a lot.

I’ve never thought he was hot. When he was young he was “ok,” but too feminine and horsey looking.

Harry is much better - has a sexy working class look to him. Comes from his bodyguard father that Di spread her legs for.

r142 that has been thoroughly debunked. Harry is Charles's kid.

R119. R136. A king or queen is not referred to as HRM. The reigning sovereign is simply referred to as His Majesty or Her Majesty., or perhaps abbreviated as "HM." The word "Royal" is not part of a sovereign's title. There is no such thing as HRM.

Thank you, R138.

I think William and Kate might have one more kid, as another extra insurance policy to ensure that the ginger idiot doesn't have a chance in hell of getting the throne.

He looks nice here in his official portrait.

I can't believe people are so easily tricked by coloring. Harry has Charles' features, not James Hewitt's. Look at the SHAPE of their noses and the close-set eyes. Their ears aren't the same shape, but Harry's also stick out (though not as bad). Charles has a weaker chin, but the shape is similar.

Other than red hair (and not even the SAME shade of red) Harry has no features that resemble Hewitt. Hewitt's eyes are further apart and a different shape, they have different noses, chins, ears, teeth, etc.

Harry and Hewitt look nothing alike, their features are different, they have different eye colors and even different shades of red hair.

Also Harry has webbed feet and a lizard tail, but you can't see them in the photo.

Boozing takes a lot out of you, including looks.

I know the feeling...

[quote]He was unbelievably gorgeous as a young man:

[quote]Serious Ralph Lauren model type:

Nope and no.

[quote]That blond mop he had on his head in his youth hid a thousand flaws.

[quote]He looks terrible for 36, it is not only the baldness. He has actual wrinkles and could pass for a bad 46.

[quote]He has the same face, it just turned more Windsory and horsey and not at all cute.

These. While at one time, he may have been relatively attractive [italic]for a Windsor[/italic] , it was an extremely brief window.

R145. I think you might be right regarding Kate having another one. Although with three Cambridge kids, the crown is never going to Harry. For some reason, the top six in line of succession are the most important. The top six require the sovereign's permission to marry. Harry is currently number six. One more kid from Wills and Kate, and Harry will be number seven, at least while Elizabeth is on the throne. Andrew was sixth, but with the birth of Louis, he's now seven. With the birth of Harry and Markle's kid, everyone behind the kid gets bumped down a notch.

George will eventually have his father's nose. Same pinched area as little Wills had.

I actually find him hot. It was expected that he'd lose his hair like the rest of that brood, and he has his mother's nose. William's wife is more conventionally pretty than his mother ever was. Still, Prince William is a handsome man. He has a great voice. He's slim. And when he wears an open-neck shirt, it appears that he has a very nice "chemin de dame." I'd love to bend him over an overstuffed, damask sofa in Clarence House. Then again, since I'm of Irish descent, I'd love to screw them all!!!

Thanks R144, R136 here. I was being a bit disingenuous regarding HRM as I’m well aware that some Americans who think that they are experts on all things British royal family invariably call Her Majesty that completely incorrect style.

“HRM” makes my ears bleed.

A while ago I read that William and Kate want 4 kids.

wills should take up tennis. build up his arms and chest. for all the rumors of him feeling a bit unpopular at the moment, getting hotter would def help. im thinking like rafa...

He had legs. He knew how to use em.

Yep. Except for their nose,eyes,ears and mouths they look nothing alike . Hope you get your cataract surgery soon R149.

The Spencer genes?

The beautiful Spencer genes?

Ahem.

If Diana were alive today she'd be looking like the late Duchess of Alba with a hair straightening worn in a bleach bob.

R162 looks like a boozier Rosie O'Donnell.

R162, why would you assume she'd age like him? Diana looked a lot like her mother, who aged pretty well (aside from the eyebags, but you know Diana would have taken care of those).

R161 "Except for their nose,eyes,ears and mouths they look nothing alike."

Yeah, except they don't share ANY of those features. Seriously, how do you imagine blue close set small eyes resemble brown wide set large eyes?

Harry has his father's overhanging beak, minus the bump on the bridge. Hewitt has a little refined tip on his nose.

Ears are totally different shapes, even the lobes don't match.

But do go on.

Harry looks a lot like Philip.

Ugly-ugly-ugly, the lot of them. Always were, always will be. And I say that as someone who ADORES the horsey Englishman looks.

Charles also looks a lot like Phillip. Again, the coloring throws people off.

Too bad Charles got stuck with the inbred Winsdor recessed chin, though. Harry lucked out there.

When did Charles get his ears pinned back? They don't stick out any more but you can see it in the above pic.

I'll give R166 the lips and maybe the chin, but not the nose and most certainly not those beady, close-set eyes that are Harry's least than flattering features.

R169, I doubt he pinned them back. They still stick out a bit, but it's less severe because his face is fleshier and more jowly. Plus his ears are probably drooping a bit from age, so they don't stand out firm like cup holders anymore.

Everyone in Britain is inbred. Of course they all look alike.

"breast-feeding is strongly correlated with social class in Britain"

How so?

Thyroid problems are a bitch!!

William is a prick. How do you fix that? It has nothing to do with his looks.

I hope I have enough of the pretty genes from Diana and Kate to overcome the fraternal handicap

Prince George is very Middleton-ish as is his little sister.

R176. William doesn't look all that bad in that photo.

Wills is a total Spencer, looks just like his uncle Charles, Earl Spencer. Both Charles and his father Johnny Spencer were considered quite good looking in their youth. The Spencers hit a wall about 45, go from hot to pudgy/stodgy.

Who makes his suits?

William is also 100% free of charisma.

Apart from Diana, has there ever been a British royal who had any charisma? Harry came close, with his photo-ops with African children, but his marriage wiped that out.

R183. I would say Diana had charisma. I would even say Sarah Ferguson had charisma. In the early days, she was friendly, fun-loving and very accessible to the press. But as for the Windsors themselves other than the queen who has it, the rest of them are pretty much missing the charisma gene.

**I meant R182

[quote]I would even say Sarah Ferguson had charisma. In the early days, she was friendly, fun-loving and very accessible to the press

Sarah did not have charisma but she was friendly and fun loving. She was the girl you wanted to go for a beer with after work, but not the one to take home to mother.

Harry still has charisma. He’s just expected to be less flirty and cheeky in public now that he’s married. But his personality wouldn’t have changed privately, the public just aren’t allowed to see it. Which is a mistake since Harry is incredibly popular,

Doubt it, R186. Now he's just the royal ginger dimwit who got hoodwinked by a cunning American grifter whom he has now inflicted on the BRF and the British public.

Whites age terribly. Most of them look like a used condom when reaching the age of 30. Yuck 🤢

R187 his mother was dim too and her marriage was awful right from the start. She was utterly miserable and at times suicidal and yet she never lost the charisma.

Take a close look. He was never very good looking. His blonde thatch, height, and status as future King is what gave hm an aura of desirability. The royal men do not use any form of sun protection or skin care. They are outdoors a lot, William breeds rare cattle. He tanned a lot on holidays with Middleton, skis in harsh sunlight in the Swiss Alps, and hunts in harsh windy conditions in the Highlands. Youthful glowing skin is beautiful, but these men have it for about two years and then it's wrecked.

There's a big difference, R189. Diana was a naive 19 year old who was exploited by two experienced people in their 30s. When the truth came out, the public felt sorry for her. No one pities Harry.

William smiled a lot more before marriage. Now he scowls and clenches his jaw in public.

It's not just his loss of hair and addition of crows' feet. His very TEETH seem to have become elongated along with his nose!

Of course Harry is Hewitt's son. Don't be ridiculous.

They both have red hair and a ruddy complexion r193. Welcome to Britain, where that is common as mud. Perhaps take a look at young Philip. They could pass for brothers.

[quote]Elizabeth never was considered an attractive girl.

She was quite pretty in the 1940s until the early 1960s.

William’s head resembles the one in his pants shown above. It’s like an eraser. Egads.

I bet he doesn't bother about skincare products and taking care of his skin. Probably none of the men do.

Interesting, that photo of Charles at r168, his eyes are Dickie Mountbatten eyes.

(R173) higher status and professional women in Britain are, statistically, much more likely to breast-feed than lower status and poorer women, who are more likely to use formula. Although obviously some higher status women do you formula and some working class women do breast-feed The correlation seems odd because you actually have to pay for formula, but it's the way it is.

My all-time favorite photo of the young, new Queen

Here's my favourite pic of the new young queen

George has got William's jowls but will instinctively know how to offset them with magnificent taste and style.

Philip really was a handsome man in his youth and well into his fifties.

You have to admit George is A-DOOR-A-BULL

I hope he doesn't let it go to his head. He certainly isn't camera shy.

Young Philly was a hot piece of ass with big dick swagger. No wonder young Lizzy couldn't get enough of him.

Of course he looked like he was born wearing a Nazi uniform, but for some members of the British aristocracy, that just added to his "charm."

Elizabeth was never good looking. Except for her mother, she is the least attractive member of the royal family. Some, like her daughter,are biting at her wheels.

Princess Anne was beautiful when she was young. That's in one of our anti-MM threads

One dreadful winter day as i fought my umbrella whilst crossing Kingsway I was forced by stopped traffic to stay on the center island. The wind blew my umbrella inside out as i cursed and stomped my soaked shoes in the rain

Then I realized stopped right before me in a royal car seated in the back was Princess Anne. The light from a skylight in the car fell on her so I got a very good look and I was surprised to find her quite lovely This was around 1995.

Where is the evidence that William ever smoked? I find it hard to believe.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I think he carries it well,he is tall and slender. I have not looked at his face since you lot brought my attention to his jewels.Kate was be in heaven. No wonder the poor girl looks exhausted sometimes.

Young Liz was pretty only to the extent that anyone can look lovely with exquisite makeup, dressed to the 9s, and draped in priceless jewels.

But with little makeup and plain clothes, Liz clearly was just not a beauty.

Everyone has different standards. Diana's looks were fading in her thirties but some thought she looked even better after the divorce?

^Only in so far as she looked [italic]happy[/italic] after the divorce and a happy person is more attractive than a sad one.

Face powder and lipstick and nothing else for her entire life. Her look may have changed dramatically for making up her eyes. We know that the entire cosmetics industry is built on the premise that ALL women can enhance their facial look. Alas, it just wasn't her thing. In the Queen's defense, however, it must be noted that she purposely down played her physical attributes so as not to detract from the seriousness of her role. She had a great figure - big tits, shapely ass though slim hipped, but you'd never know it because she hid it.

Little make-up

I thought Diana looked her best in the 90s. She was at her peak in face, with the babyweight gone, and in body after she got her eating disorder under control and was healthier. And her style was killer. She looked much better with sleeker 90s hair than 80s poof and more bodycon and simpler looks than those big shoulder matchy matchy 80s frocks.

I agree that Elizabeth, while no great beauty, was a perfectly pleasant looking young lady.

And yes, word is that she has always enjoyed lovely clothes (as did her Mum and late sister) but disdained fashion because it might compromise her image as Queen. She's practical but has a far greater appreciation of luxury than her dowdy public image would suggest.

Liz was never a beauty, ditto her sister, but both had acceptable levels of attractiveness. Liz was also known to have a really nice rack.

I don't think Liz really hid her figure so much. When she was young she took full advantage of the strapless nipped in waist ballgown being in style. She wore a number of them that clearly displayed her tiny waist and big boobs.

Liz was okay... her facial contours were not the greatest.

Also, she's been in granny mode for so long I think people forget from about the 50s to the mid 70s, Liz was quite the fashionista. She had great classic style but still looked of the time.

Looks at this fab little shift dress with the opera gloves and head wrap!:

And Lizzy in white go-go boots. Come on!

^^^The boots hid her cankles pretty well.

As a short, busty woman with curves, Liz was smart to avoid high fashion in the 60s through 80s. Most of it would have looked awful on her.

Diana was the modern-age fashionable clothes hanger the Royal Family so desperately needed. Tall, leggy, fabulous..

The Testino photographs of Diana right before she died are my favorite. She ditched the frumpy short layers.

R160, Look at the neck. The face is a Photoshop.

Bet ya think this is photoshopped too? Fool. ^^

Another "fake". Hardly!

I took this snap myself.

Conserving water.

I'd like to see what you all looked like at 20 and what you look like at 40. There are only a few people that still look good when you get older.

Harry looks like his mother's big sister, Lady Sarah.

Six months of testing, using two women with coloring similar to the Queen's, went into the Coronation makeup.

[quote]A number of considerations had to be taken into account when determining what make-up Elizabeth would wear on the day. She had to look her best for the crowds that lined the streets to see the state procession but also photograph well for black-and-white television and colour film. In addition, the make-up had to perform in three types of lighting: the artificial light of Westminster Abbey; the interior of the state coach; and instances of full daylight. As there was only one brief break in the ceremony just before the Queen returned to the palace, the make-up also had to remain in place for up to four hours without retouching – the Abbey service alone ran for just over three hours – and for most of the day without being reapplied.

[quote]As well as Elizabeth’s preference for wearing a minimal amount of make-up, there was another reason for keeping things simple. The coronation was a religious event with one part, the anointing, considered so sacrosanct that it was not filmed or broadcast. Given this, the Queen considered that make-up should be kept to the minimum needed for broadcasting and filming.

R232, people with time and money should still look good at 36.

BTW, JLo is 49 and looks way better than she did at 20.

r195 her face has always been homely

When I was a child, & Elizabeth would've still been in her 30s, I thought that her title meant she was the most beautiful woman in the world. But she didn't seem worthy to my young eyes.

Coronation Day

I must have been nine or ten years old while thumbing through our new set of World Book Psychlopedia, obviously in the E volume. This was the very first glimpse I ever had of Queen Elizabeth, and the first I knew that she even existed.

^ ENCYCLOPEDIA - lol

[R242]

Their comments tell us all,they are ugly. If their insides are ugly,nasty trolls....surely their outward appearances reflect that.A bunch of potato shaped Frau's and beastly shaped cows daring to comment on the RF's appearance. Go right back to the trailers you evidently occupy.Peasants.

I don't care how the queen looks one way or another, but I find your over-investment in the royal family and an outdated British class system curious as you are clearly American - the reference to 'trailers' gave you away. If a British person was trying to adopt an elevated persona they might have said something like 'hovel', or if they were trying to be classist in a more contemporary way, may have made reference to council estates. This is obviously meaningful for you - investing in a class system that is not your own and aligning yourself with the perspective of aristocracy presumably affords a sense of symbolic value by association?

One dreadful winter day as i fought my umbrella whilst crossing Kingsway I was forced by stopped traffic to stay on the center island. The wind blew my umbrella inside out as i cursed and stomped my soaked shoes in the rain

Then I realized stopped right before me in a royal car seated in the back was Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, entirely nude. The light from a skylight in the car fell on her so I got a very good look and I was surprised to find she had such pert, full breasts with perky nipples. This was around 1995.

How can ten posts go by without anyone mentioning ME?

Camilla in a royal car in 1995? Try again, darling.

[quote]the Abbey service alone ran for just over three hours

JFC were they all wearing Depends?

Sure it wasn't Princess Anne and her lovely skin (R243)?

Oh R245, bless your heart.

"Elizabeth was never good looking. Except for her mother, she is the least attractive member of the royal family. "

You've clearly never seen Charles.

He looks fine to me. Let's see a pic of you OP, when you were 20 and now.

These Royals thread always end in big, salty tears and hair pulling.

Sorry, R190, William is good-looking. Here's a picture of him with Kate from an event today. Tall, slim, broad-shouldered, nice hint of a treasure trail peaking out of his color, with a firm jaw, sensuous lips, piercing gaze...I can imagine his hands caressing my cheeks.

Harry may be randy, but William is a studl!

I totally agree with your assessment r252, and once Wills hits 40 the baldness will actually be a sexy plus.

Thanks, R253. Sorry for the typo. I meant collar, not"color."

Here's another photo of him with his head turned sideways. His gaze looks rugged

Bald is no negative in my book. Wills has always been the candle I'd hold and blow. Stupid is not sexy to me, which is why Dipshit was always friend zoned in my fantasy.

He actually looks a lot like his maternal grandpa in the full-face picture. Except John Spencer kept his hair longer.

He'd look fine if he weren't so jowly. In R254 with his head turned to profile view he looks quite good.

Why such a puffy face when he's so thin?

I just don't see the "jowls" from either angle and the shape of his head also looks just about perfect.

You naysayers are such evil queens.

William was gorgeous up until probably his mid 20s. Great body. Harry was never attractive, maybe by British royal standards. He has a good body too, but his face was never even remotely good looking.

It's like the structure of his face changed.

[quote]Why such a puffy face when he's so thin?

Alcohol, most likely.

R230 That's a great photo. Were you at Sandringham when you were able to catch this intimate moment between the brothers ? Kudos and I hope you can share more from your treasure trove of memories.

That is a terrible picture, r252, they both look they are in their mid forties. They also look miserable. And there is no evidence whatsoever that William is cleverer than Harry...

He should’ve used retin-A from his mid-20s. Except for the saggy facial skin, he’s pretty attractive.

Their bodies look good, actually. But they both need profractional laser treatments to tighten the skin on their faces. I'd ablate 11% of the skin surface, go at least 500 microns deep, do two passes, include a ton of coagulation, and follow the procedure with a mask of platelet rich plasma.

R265,

Do you see good results from PRP facials? Do you think PRP injections work better?

Profractional laser treatments can really work wonders.

It's funny how Kate has no hips. She has breasts but everything below that just gets narrower, she must eat hardly anything. It reminds me of when men get breasts implants/put on a padded bra and the shape is all wrong and they have big fake tits sticking out but there are no hips below to balance it out so everything just tapers down.

R266, the healing after laser seems faster with the PRP. I haven't had injections... yet...

The Spice Girls are older and look way fresher.

And most of the world at large, r270

R269,

I did a lot of reading on PRP. There are some okay studies, but I’ve also found some that failed to show a benefit. Not sure if it’s worth the pain...

R263, get real! They are a very good-looking couple in their thirties. Don't expect the Kardashians or botoxed celebrities. They look like an affluent couple who are active and fit.

R265, I'm a weeny about the pain. Besides the numbing cream, anything else I can request to be more comfortable during a profactional laser treatment?

My doctor gives me a Percocet and I also take Xanax and Tylenol.

Speaking of looks going downhill... She looked great here and dare I say more ethnic

The procedure is painful even with the drugs and your face will hurt for a day or two afterwards, but you just have to deal with it and remember that beauty comes with a price.

True 'dat

Personally I prefer a more ethnic Meghan. She's washed out a lot of that exotic beauty in exchange for a bland conformist So Cal sorority gal Stacey Dash formula.

I love the pain during profractional laser treatments. During the procedure, I think about how my endurance gives me such an edge over people who would never be able to take it. I focus my thoughts on me staying smooth while others become old and wrinkly.

Gosh, most white people age terribly. They look like a used condom by the age of 30. Yuck 🤢

Taking care of your own kids will do that to you r281.

R282 so are billions of others all over the world

Yeah, R 283, and they’re all white or Asian.

Will is still handsome. And he's obviously packing a big thick trouser snake.

r281

LOL you've never been to the south or west side of Chicago, or North of Central Park in Manhattan.

R216, That's the future adult Charlotte right there!

R281 is the Meh-gan lunatic accusing everyone of being racist. He/She has already come up with that "looks like a used condom" nonsense in some other BRF threads.

Just ignore this idiot.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

R288 and ignore the idiot racist at r282 who claimed in a few posts that blacks (as opposed to whites and Asians) don’t take care of their own kids. Seriously, there are plenty of racists on this thread, why ban just one?

^By the way, the new tactic that racists now use is to attack back by accusing their accusers of racism when their racism has been pointed out.

About 65% of African-American kids do not have their biological fathers in their homes according to the US census. That's a fact. Don't blame whites and Asians for that cultural problem.

R292, Of course you can blame whites and Asians! Why not? If it weren’t for slavery, the blacks would all have it so great!! Everyone knows that white and Asian Americans are responsible for slavery. Whites and Asians are so evil.

Just gray rock the mother fucker. It would be one thing if they offered thoughtful discussion but they are only in it to amuse themselves by stirring up shit.

William's profile will look very good on a coin. That's like half his job anyway.

^ok I laughed

Isn't the image of Queen Elizabeth that's on paper money decades old? So maybe when Wills becomes King he can pictured as the floppy-haired16 year old hottie he was to satisfy all the critics here.

The bills and coins can include an image of Wills wearing a crown.

He has a big cock right?

I have no idea, r299, but judging from his wife constant sour face it wouldn’t appear so.

He's got a massive cock and Kate, being a very lucky lady and knowing her luck, isvery happy with it.

R118, that is indeed Liz in R116’s photo. Knob.

Here's the Christmas card of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. William is a good-looking man, and it looks as if he packs some nice heat! And I love his chemin des dames!

r303 That picture of George is disturbing. He's adorable but is an attention hog and if he keeps posing like that he'll attract the wrong kind of attention.

r303

William's smile is all forced. Of course Kate and George have nice natural smiles.

r297

QEII through the ages via money portraits (all Commonwealths)

What’s a chemin des dames? I googled and got a location in France.

Wills looks damn good in the Xmass card. And George...George has already cemented his status as DL Icon for Life.

I wonder how old Charles will be on the new banknotes?

R307, it translates to "ladies' path." It's a euphemism for a nice hairy chest on a man leading to...

R303, this year they were opting for a less formal setting, so George being a bit of a cheeky devil fits perfectly into the chosen setting.

Also please note that he doesn't have to wear shorts this time.

Sorry, my message at R311 was designated for R304.

Wow thread died after the Queen confirmed The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are coming to Christmas festivities. Guess you naysayers realized the rumors you started or repeated looked stupid. I still think the leak is a cousin. Can you all please continue posting pics of Prince Williams abundant crotch area,asking for a friend.

What is sadder OP, losing one's looks or, in your case, never having the to begin with?

**never having them

[quote] Camilla in a royal car in 1995? Try again, darling.

Why not? She was the official mistress back then.

It's tragic about the hair. Let's be honest, hair is everything. With it, he'd be a golden god. However, he still has most of the best of Diana - the long, lean, toned body and the aristocratic features. But thankfully not the crazy.

If I'd been forced to choose no hair or crazy, I might choose crazy.

He still looks good to me. His body is in excellent shape. Men lose their hair, it's a fact of life. Hair goes gray. You can still look good. Let's face it, being rich, powerful, and well-groomed goes a long way.

I think what stopped William & Harry using Propecia (Finasteride) to keep their hair was the risk of Infertility and Birth defects, once your hair has gone it's too late to get a noticeable result. The same would apply for hair transplants when you also need to take a DHT inhibitor.

[quote]I don't think a buzz cut would help, he is just one of those men who don't look good with short hair/bald

I disagree. I think William could pull off a completely shaved head. I wish he would just do it, I think his sex appeal would increase

[R321]

Totally agree,he should also start wearing just a loincloth. ......preferably one that's too small

R321 They've given him a different hairline in pic 2, he's shiny bald on top - no stubble.

What does it matter now anyway? They are all older now, married and have kids. They don't have to worry about the hunt anymore.

William is a pleasant looking chap, but the huge nose, yellow horse teeth and heavy lower jaw mean he cannot be considered handsome.

Why doesn't he get his teeth whitened? Hell, he could have a dentist do a housecall if he wants.

I would gladly assist the future King with loinclothe measurements and purchases, big teeth or not.

---The Other MRS.WALLIS SIMPSON

R304 - what kind of attention? George is joyous as he is now wearing big boy pants, and mirthful as he just ripped out a massive squeaker, much to the amusement of his family ... Riiiiiiip ..... phhhhrrrrt!

R328, he looks like he's doing an arabesque. He does take ballet lessons, doesn't he?

R329 Quite

I really think George is going to be gay. Like, OBVIOUSLY gay. Swishy femme gay. How is that going to work with him being heir to the throne?

[R331]

Really,his mannerisms tell you that?Wow, you sound like an idiot.Go back to the loony bin you have obviously escaped from Frau.

r332 every gay man can recognize mannerisms like that from our own childhoods.

[R332]......Do we really look for that in children?

I mean it sounds Freudian?What next,electric conversion therapy for toddlers because they want a blankey for their naptime?I hate when straight's use this logic for their own homophobic desires/fantasies. But when we as a community do it,it makes it boarder on insanity.Stop condoning self hate traits....

FFS, leave the kid alone.

Make fun of his father, or his mother, or his uncle, or the bump-cradling grifter his uncle married, if you like. Children, however, should be off limits.

How is speculating that PG might be gay making fun of him?

Charlotte's going to look like Edith Head when she grow up.

He does look better in the picture on the right, but I'm not sure he'd actually look like that with a shaved head. R325 pretty much outlined why he can never truly be handsome. He can fix his teeth, like his mom did, and even improve the hair situation, but his facial bone structure can't be helped. He can't exactly get a nose job either. The British royals are just not an attractive family. William's kids aren't even that cute. Although they could grow to be attractive adults. The reverse of their dad, which would better for them.

Wtf are you on about, R339? William's kids are super cute - and there are hardly any kids not being cute.

Thanks R329 and R330 - it’s lovely to see Wills and Kate supporting their little Prima donna in the making. And to those posters saying he is gay, well yes, statistically speaking, the majority of male ballet dancers are gay, however it’s not a rule! I found it interesting hearing Ms Travolta recap the evening a Queen spent 15 minutes dancing with a Princess. I’m betting that Travolta replays that evening with his Franklin Mint commemorative Diana doll and Western Ken.

R340- give me a break, not all kids are cute. Let's be real. His kids aren't that cute in my opinion, there just ok. I've seen way cuter just walking down the street.

Ya. Wills should just shave it. Recent pics show he lost a bit of weight and looks pretty good. Haz on the other hand is a drug addled chain smoking mess. His ten minutes of good-looking ended abruptly -- pics from the infamous Australian tour show rumpled ill fitting suits he couldn't get buttoned, uncombed too-long hair, and DEAD eyes. Better shspe up for fatherhood dude.

The Cambridge kids are indeed attractive. George and Charlotte could be child models. And not all kids are cute. Of the royals, Lady Louise was far from pretty, and is even less so now. Her brother has nice features but never smiles. The Phillips children are not attractive. Mia Tindall would be adorable but she is a little butterball.

he has an upside-down face with that big jaw.

Prince George is cute. He is going to be fabulous.

Most boys inherit their mother's father's head of hair, and fortunately for Princes George and Louis, Michael Middleton has a gorgeous full head of hair at age 69. So they are likely to keep their hair into old age.

By contrast, Princes William and Harry inherited their hair genes from the Spencers, and Johnnie, the 8th Earl Spencer, started balding early.

I respect William let it all go. I guess he didn't have a choice being in the public eye and a royal. But plastic surgery would have maintained his face rather well.

I've read the baldness gene always comes from the mother's side of the family.

William's face has gotten significantly more puffy. His cheeks are much thicker than when he was young.

BUT THOSE TEETH! My God, his teeth are jaundiced. Does he not own a toothbrush?

It's so funny no one calls them inbred, even though these hideous royals are the definition of the term.