I'm rewatching Social Network right now and still pissed that this brilliance lost to the mundane, meh King's Speech.
And that's not nearly as bad as Brokeback losing to Crash.
Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.
Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.
Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.
Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.
I'm rewatching Social Network right now and still pissed that this brilliance lost to the mundane, meh King's Speech.
And that's not nearly as bad as Brokeback losing to Crash.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | January 26, 2019 7:20 AM |
That’s probably the only performance by Armie Hammer I thought was good.
And Andrew Garfield was fantastic.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | November 6, 2018 1:25 AM |
OP, director David Fincher is not liked. End of the story.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | November 6, 2018 1:39 AM |
OP
It’s much more sinister in retrospect.
Funny that they never mentioned that key second round funding, and senior board positions, were indirectly funded by the CIA. The purpose was access to user data.
This is the most balanced mainstream article I’ve found. Even they have serious doubts about how truthful Zuckerberg is about the depth of the relationship between FBook and Langley.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | November 6, 2018 1:55 AM |
Incendies was better than both of those films combined and all it got was a lousy best foreign language film nomination.
I think I finally stopped caring about Oscars when I saw lifeless turds like The King's Speech and The Artist being hailed by the Academy so much.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | November 6, 2018 2:05 AM |
Two snubs for nominations were so egregious that they spurred Academy to reform their rules for the category: “Hoop Dreams” for Documentary Feature, and “The Dark Knight” for Best Picture.
I’ll defend “The Artist” for Best Picture, if only because 2011 was a terrible year for films, and it was one of the few decent movies nominated. It’s weak if you compare it to “The Godfather” and “All About Eve,” but put it against nominees like “Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close,” “War Horse” and “The Help,” and suddenly its victory seems a lot better.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | November 6, 2018 2:10 AM |
I can think of about 18 snubs.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | November 6, 2018 2:12 AM |
Shakespeare in Love- 'nuff said.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | November 6, 2018 2:16 AM |
Jesse eisenberg playing zuckerberg and what he thinks is how aspies act is such a caricature. So bad and terrible I just cant.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | November 6, 2018 2:26 AM |
I just can't "I just can't," r9, so fuck you.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | November 6, 2018 2:29 AM |
Jesse Eisenberg deserved the Oscar over Colin Firth, and comparing the two performances and films makes it clear th contest isn’t even close. (To be fair, Firth should have won the year before for “A Single Man,” so he wouldn’t have an empty mantle either).
by Anonymous | reply 11 | November 6, 2018 2:35 AM |
I've liked Jesse Eisenberg in everything I've seen him in.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | November 6, 2018 2:37 AM |
Jesse Eisenberg didn't capture a single aspect of Mark Zuckerberg's personality.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | November 6, 2018 2:59 AM |
The best way to think of “The Social Network” is that it’s a biopic like “Amadeus” is. It might not capture the events with any degree of accuracy, but it gets at such universal truths that it feels more accurate that way. Eisenberg captured what is essential about the rise of Facebook, even though it’s not mimicking Zuckerberg.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | November 6, 2018 3:32 AM |
[quote]It might not capture the events with any degree of accuracy, but it gets at such universal truths that it feels more accurate that way
fake news
by Anonymous | reply 15 | November 6, 2018 3:40 AM |
I don't know Zuckerberg, so JNGASP.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | November 6, 2018 4:25 AM |
I thought Johnny Depp should have been nominated for Black Mass.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | November 6, 2018 5:36 AM |
"I don't know Zuckerberg, so JNGASP."
I jngasped once. The Montagues more matching outfits to a neighborhood barbecue and that color combination was horrendous!
by Anonymous | reply 18 | November 6, 2018 6:48 AM |
Dunaway deserved a nomination for Barfly. Sally Kirkland took her spot.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | November 6, 2018 6:55 AM |
Emma Thompson not being nominated for "Saving Mr Banks" still outrages me a little. They nominated Meryl instead for "August: Osage County" for a fairly one-note performance.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | November 6, 2018 7:11 AM |
Barbra for NUTS.
They were NUTS not to give her that award!
by Anonymous | reply 21 | November 6, 2018 7:22 AM |
Mia Farrow, crazy now or not, deserved the Oscar for Rosemary's Baby - waaaay over Hepburn and her tics, or Streisand.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | November 6, 2018 7:39 AM |
Mia should have been nominated for Broadway Danny Rose too.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | November 6, 2018 9:04 PM |
James Dean WAS nominated for “GIANT”, but in the wrong category. He was 100% a supporting character, not lead. Had he been nominated for Supporting he would have won, posthumously, of course.
Also I feel outrage when I think of how Anthony Perkins wasn’t nominated for “PSYCHO”. Not only an iconic film and performance, but was completely unique and groundbreaking when released.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | November 6, 2018 9:28 PM |
Honestly Lucy Boynton deserves a nom for BR. She was lovely.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | January 22, 2019 9:28 AM |
I think the Academy fucked up by giving the Oscar to that fucking awful "Crash" over "Brokeback Mountain"....at that point, I was just done with the Oscars after being a fan for decades. And, I know a lot of other gay people felt the same way and stopped watching and going to/giving Oscar parties.
And, the Oscars are also dying because Millennials/Gen Z doesn't care about awards, or serious movies, or fashion, or stars.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | January 22, 2019 9:36 AM |
Thank you for bumping this thread so promptly. I’m sure we all know by now who we can add to this list in 2 hours...
by Anonymous | reply 27 | January 22, 2019 10:16 AM |
Emma Thompson was robbed. Jesse Eisenberg deserved to win for The Social Network. I can watch both Saving Mr Banks and Social Network over and over.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | January 22, 2019 10:23 AM |
The Kings Speech was better than Social Network and deserved to win.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | January 22, 2019 10:39 AM |
[quote]And that's not nearly as bad as Brokeback losing to Crash.
Neither one deserved to win. Brokeback sucked. Crash was like a TV episode. I don't remember the other three.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | January 22, 2019 11:14 AM |
Eisenberg should have won. The Social Network should have won. Andrew Garfield should have been nominated.
James Dean should have been in Supporting for GIANT
Anthony Perkins should have been nominated for PSYCHO
by Anonymous | reply 31 | January 22, 2019 11:18 AM |
Eisenberg was great, but I truly love Colin Firth in The King's Speech. He should have won for A Single Man the year prior as well. Andrew Garfield definitely should have been nominated. I probably would have swapped out Jeremy Renner in The Town for Garfield.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | January 22, 2019 11:21 AM |
Renner was good in The Town but I agree
by Anonymous | reply 33 | January 22, 2019 11:22 AM |
Social Network was dull. The King’s Speech was the correct winner.
Brokeback was a snooze, too, but it shouldn’t have lost to the wretched Crash.
It should have lost to “Munich.”
by Anonymous | reply 34 | January 22, 2019 12:05 PM |
[quote]Eisenberg should have won.
Naw. Firth was brilliant. Eisenberg wasn’t.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | January 22, 2019 12:07 PM |
God, R32, how good was a Single Man? A great novel and a great film.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | January 22, 2019 12:12 PM |
Looks like Toni Collette was snubbed for Hereditary and Thom Yorke's score for Suspiria was snubbed as well.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | January 22, 2019 12:42 PM |
God...all these old ladies on here with Masterpiece Theater taste...
If you think Brokeback Mountain and The Social Network are boring, it pretty much tells me how boring you are.
#NoTasteLikeBlandMiddleOfTheRoadTaste
by Anonymous | reply 39 | January 26, 2019 6:52 AM |
DL fave Nicole Kidman. Say what you will about her, but she got totally screwed - nomination AND award-wise - when it came to "To Die For."
by Anonymous | reply 40 | January 26, 2019 7:03 AM |
The Oscars have long been just a celebration of the mundane and talentless.
As for worthwhile films of real merit and integrity being ignored you need only say three words:
Gidget Goes Hawaiian.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | January 26, 2019 7:10 AM |
Dunaway should have been nominated for MD. She came in second in two film critics awards voting and god knows the performance holds up and is remembered more than cunt Sarandon in Atlantic City and Marsha Mason in Only When I Laugh (although I do love that performance).
And Katherine Hepburn winning a fourth for On Golden Pond I'm sure felt right at the time, but now it's just kinda pathetic.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | January 26, 2019 7:13 AM |
R11 I totally agree, Colin Firth should have won for A Single Man.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | January 26, 2019 7:20 AM |
Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.
Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!