Phillip Picardi, the chief content officer of Condé Nast’s Teen Vogue, who was a rising star at the magazine publisher, is leaving the company.
Mr. Picardi will be the editor in chief of Out, a magazine that focuses on LGBTQ fashion, lifestyle and entertainment.
His eyes are beautiful.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||03/14/2019|
With bae Dr Darrien Sutton
|by Anonymous||reply 1||08/28/2018|
First, OUT is a godawful, insidious rag. Second, this is not a very well-veiled way of throwing yet another insta-ho thread in our faces.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||08/28/2018|
Hopefully he will fire everyone there and shift the focus back to gays and lesbians and not trans 24/7.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||08/28/2018|
Isn't he the one who made Teen Vogue into T Vogue?
|by Anonymous||reply 6||08/28/2018|
Ugh if he is then of COURSE he's moving to Out, it's Trans central now.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||08/28/2018|
Ummm... he moved to the new queer magazine "Them" not "Out"
|by Anonymous||reply 8||08/28/2018|
Oh. Them. That's right. It was, like, the T version of Vogue, right?
|by Anonymous||reply 9||08/28/2018|
R6 I think it was more because of Elaine Welteroth
|by Anonymous||reply 11||08/28/2018|
The magazine is insufferable
|by Anonymous||reply 12||08/28/2018|
fashion, lifestyle, entertainment. jesus fuck, just fold already.
and didn't we used to hate being reduced to a "lifestyle"?
|by Anonymous||reply 13||08/28/2018|
Actually, it's OK. It just takes itself too seriously. Not much humor or joy in it's articles
|by Anonymous||reply 14||08/28/2018|
From Teen Vogue to Out: definitely downwardly mobile.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||08/29/2018|
[quote]Phillip Picardi, the chief content officer of Condé Nast’s Teen Vogue, who was a rising star at the magazine publisher, is leaving the company.
[quote]Mr. Picardi will be the editor in chief of Out, a magazine that focuses on LGBTQ fashion, lifestyle and entertainment.
Sounds like a huge step down. Wonder if he got canned from Conde Nast of if he's just dumb enough to think being editor-in-chief of a bad magazine is a better career move.
Personally, I would have been willing to wait a couple more years to get the top spot at a prestige Conde Nast title than slumming at a rag like Out.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||08/29/2018|
R17 the post is wrong. He did not join out. He started a new lgbtq magazine called "them". It's been in existence for over 6 months.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||08/29/2018|
He's the one who left to start Them? Ugh. What's the deal OP? That's worth an F&F.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||08/29/2018|
He looks like an alien in OP’s picture.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||08/29/2018|
He is the digital director of Teen Vogue and Allure, and also started up the LBGT site Them at Condé Nast (the latter is pretty bad). He is leaving to go to Out.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||09/04/2018|
He is leaving Conde Nast (where he was Anna Wintour's protege and started Them) to edit Out.
Them is a massive failure — a traffic, buzz and revenue black hole — and he fell out of Anna's favor. It was too SJW trans-y and downscale.
Look for him to kill off Out for good.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||09/04/2018|
R25 wow. He's leaving Them already? I know that progressives have been attacking Out magazine for not being inclusive enough. I guess that might be why they're making this change?
|by Anonymous||reply 26||09/04/2018|
[quote]progressives have been attacking Out magazine for not being inclusive enough.
It's too inclusive.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||09/04/2018|
After the Milo feature and Chadwick Moore being a general dick they have been attacked a lot
|by Anonymous||reply 28||09/04/2018|
[quote] It (Them) was too SJW trans-y and downscale.
Thank you, r25, that's a better description than I could have come up with. What's the old joke, "The food isn't very good, and such small portions!"? That's Them. The content isn't very good, and there's not much of it. What is there is poorly written and edited.
Still, going to Out doesn't seem an auspicious career move...
|by Anonymous||reply 29||09/04/2018|
Wow. He's part forest creature.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||09/06/2018|
[quote]A profile in the Sunday @nytimes today is...a major dream come true.
Is he quoting Lincoln or Mandela?
|by Anonymous||reply 32||09/06/2018|
The New York Times in March: "Anna Wintour Thinks Phillip Picardi Is The Future of Conde Nast"
Five months later, he bails for a dwindling print magazine.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||09/12/2018|
I didnt think OUT could get any worse, but here we are. Picardi spends more paper inches on trans/queer issues than gay ones. THEM is a cesspit of horseshit.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||09/12/2018|
Isn't he the one who commissioned that infamous Teen Vogue's Guide to Anal Sex article in which females were referred to as "non-prostate owners"?
|by Anonymous||reply 35||09/12/2018|
And there was originally no mention of condoms.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||09/12/2018|
This kid is cute but it's obvious he's got a peanut for a brain.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||09/12/2018|
The fashion industry is the acme of integrity.
(Slick Woods went into labor as soon as she stepped off Rihanna's Fenty runway in NYC on Wednesday evening)
|by Anonymous||reply 38||09/13/2018|
Proper link. Yes, he got engaged to @DoctorDarienMD.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||03/14/2019|