Gay NYT reporter Jeremy Peters is seriously fucking up re: Trump

The story on Trump supporters:

Jeremy responds to his critics:

ugh not that ugly face again, op!

We've got so many NYers here. Someone's got to have something interesting to report on this guy. Come on, DL, don't let us down.

Jeremy is based in D.C.

This is the second time in a month that Peters has been called out for writing misleading puff pieces for Trump. If you challenge his reporting, he blocks you on Twitter.

He got close to $1 million for his book about Bannon and the current GOP.

So keep fucking the gays over in the Times — and making the GOP seem sympathetic for the midterms — so you can get access for that book, Jeremy!

What is the NYT, except a collection of "confusingly sympathetic" puff pieces on congresspersons, activists and academics who call for Trump's impeachment every day? So one conservative who used to be a liberal gets coverage that's not nasty for once, and it's off with the reporters' heads!

I find him very hot. And used to think he wasn't that bad. But he's taken a sharp turn for the worst in recent months. It's a shame

Nyt helped get Trump elected. The cunt hag Maureen Dowd has spent 20 years using their op ed to produce anti Clinton as well as anti democrat bile. Her peer, Maggie Haberman surreptitiously supported Trump as well and printed lies about the Clinton's in her book.

It's funny. I had no idea he was gay, but I had a visceral dislike of him from the first time I ever saw him on MSNBC. He's not on terribly often, but when he is I always feel like he's a liar.

puff pieces for WMDs, too

anyone who expects that gays cannot be trolls for the right are seriously out of touch

another media whore cashing in

He's a personal buddy of Steve bannon

He's a cute dork though

As he's lowering himself into the hot tub at Steve's house in Lakeland, FL, Steve says, "You know this hot tub used to be filled with hydrochloric acid? Don't worry, I've had it pressure-washed."

Link below, sorry (r17)

god, what a shitshow the nyt has become

[quote]god, what a shitshow the nyt has become

Agreed. It's rather sad actually. Robust journalism is a cornerstone of a strong democracy.

[quote]Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

There's a reason why it's in the First Amendment.

from R18:

And then shit gets weird. The Post obtained a February 2015 email from Bannon's former landlord that read: "[E]ntire Jacuzzi bathtub seems to have been covered in acid."

WHAT?!

The landlord also noticed that padlocks had been installed on interior doors (creepy), while other doors were totally removed (also creepy).

[that does sound weird!]

[quote]He got close to $1 million for his book about Bannon and the current GOP.

Why would they pay a minor reporter such a large sum of money?

Wasn't Jeremy the one who ran off a show and it became a big joke. He had a hissy fit.

If he blocks anyone on twitter who criticizes him, I wouldn't be surprised if he had a hissy fit and flounced off a show.

He's out and doesn't seem self loathing at all. What drove him to alt right?

The Times can't win for losing.

BernieBros swear the Times hated Sanders, ran multiple negative stories about him and helped elect Clinton.

Clinton lovers make R10s argument.

Trump's people follow Le Grand Orange's lead about the "failing" NYT that lives to take down Fearless Leader.

And then today you have this piece from the aptly named Charles Blow, who had written the same column every week for the past two years.

Though I swear that this has been the title of at least one DL thread, if not multiples.

R11, Seriously? Jeremy Peters pings from Earth to Jupiter.

R26: Why should a traitor not be impeached?

R26 the times has this problem because they go to absurd lengths to maintain their both sides are equal philosophy. They are so committed to it that when they can't make a credible argument that both sides are even they will make up ridiculous shit. Anything but doing something that could get them criticized in bad faith by republicans as having bias.

It's made them gather all kinds of idiotic articles

It wasn't McCarthyism,! Vineyarders are basically progressive, educated and opinionated. Even the affluent Blacks in Oak Bluffs have cherished opinions they've held on to for years. Old money on the Cape, the Vineyard and even along the south coast (Buzzard Bay communities- Marion etc) are opinionated, somewhat isolated and would shun Trump types, regardless of his supposed wealth..

Jeremy Peters is pathetic in the NYT and worse on Twitter. A lot of respected, credible people have made good points in criticizing his work and he will have none of it, dismisses it as nonsense from extremists. Times people are known for their arrogance and he may be the worst.

As an aside, when he's being a pompous, nasty shithead on twitter, does nobody there take him aside and tell him to act less like a teen-age punk, more like a professional adult?

I agree something about the NYTimes sister extreme arrogance to entitlement to most of their reporters. Anyone who criticizes any piece of it is mocked and dismissed. In their minds they are each perfect

Regarding Dershowitz, however, he was on npr a few nights ago [1A] and I thought all the outrage against him is displaced. He’s the first to say he hates and disapproves of Trump. He’s just saying that if you’re gonna call for impeachment you need to have a verifiable, certifiable, bona fide crime having been committed to hang it on. Treason, bribery yes. But it’s also too easy to call despicable and incompetant behavior crimes. In fact the danger is criminalizing opposing political opinion - and that is far too dangerous a slope to slip diwn. As a lefty myself, I want to Impeach Trump for every deplorable Tweet. But we need the goods on his beyond-a-doubt commital of a crime before we should impeach. And hopefully, that is precisely what Mueller is taking his sweet time in doing.

You're full of shit R33 Dershowitz has never said he hates trump or want him gone and is one of his most devoted pundits on network News. Only thing I've ever seen him criticize trump on is separating families

I saw Dershowitz on Chris Matthews' show and he did indeed say that he dislikes Trump and did not vote for him.

I always thought he had major gay face but didn't know he was out until now. He has the same smarmy vibe you see in many beltway journalists.

R35 he literally has had dinner with Trump the white house multiple times. You are mistaken

R33 I think what people are outraged about Dershowitz for is his claims that being disinvited from a few dinner parties is equivalent to McCarthyism.

That level of self-involved narcissism is indeed shocking.

Yeah, so go fuck yourself, R34. On npr he was quite clear about his dislike for Trump.

The Dershowitz troll is full of shit. While he makes stuff up, here is me posting an actual clip of his shameless defense of trump.

And not just Trump, he also says democrats should get behind his newest ultra conservative supreme court pick.

So go fuck yourself troll. Dershowitz is staunchly pro trump and has been for over a year

Dershowitz attacked the FBI for seizing Michael Cohen documents (even though the crimes he was charged with don't involve Trump.)

Then went to the white house for a private dinner that same week

R33 here is Dershowitz writing in his own words that trump shouldn't be impeached EVEN IF WE FIND EVIDENCE HE COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA.

That's literally the opposite of your post that he supposedly just doesn't think Dems have enough to impeach right now. Again, you have no idea what you're talking about or are a troll

Dershowitz may have said he dislikes Trump to try and save face but he is one of the most aggressive trump defenders on TV. Not that far off from Hannity

[quote]if you’re gonna call for impeachment you need to have a verifiable, certifiable, bona fide crime having been committed to hang it on

You mean, like lying about a blowjob?

huge bummer

had crush on him, cute smart guy, but fukkit, I think dersh is an asswipe. bad call Jeremy

he still welcome on morn joe? I hope not

tho mika likes his cock huh

R40 thru R44 is a troll

I'm a troll because I refute nonsense that Dershowitz is somehow anti-Trump, sure

I was watching a book party reception for Ann Coulter that aired on CSPAN & there was Jeremy Peters holding hands w/ & hugging & kissing Ann Coulter.

Pic?

Starting at 3:10, R49.

Peters is fucking complicit trash, just like Haberman, Dowd, and the truly repulsive Chris Cillizza. They'll all watch democracy burn and then write pieces about how nice and warm it is. Fuck them all to hell.

What is the evidence that he's gay? Google is showing me nothing.

R52, go home, you’re drunk. He’s married to a dude.

R52 He's married to a man lmao

They need to change out their reporters more often. Once you’ve worked for the Times you can go anywhere. They need to stop hanging on like losers and move on with their lives.

There are a couple of writers there that are just plain shady.

That being said the NYT troll is overdoing it.

Cute? He looks like Norman Bates after a long, sleepless night of taxidermy-ing.