"The Coming Collapse"
Too "Chicken Little" or prescient? After reading the entire article, I'm not feeling very optimistic.
[quote]It is impossible for any doomed population to grasp how fragile the decayed financial, social and political system is on the eve of implosion. All the harbingers of collapse are visible: crumbling infrastructure; chronic underemployment and unemployment; the indiscriminate use of lethal force by police; political paralysis and stagnation; an economy built on the scaffolding of debt; nihilistic mass shootings in schools, universities, workplaces, malls, concert venues and movie theaters; opioid overdoses that kill some 64,000 people a year; an epidemic of suicides; unsustainable military expansion; gambling as a desperate tool of economic development and government revenue; the capture of power by a tiny, corrupt clique; censorship; the physical diminishing of public institutions ranging from schools and libraries to courts and medical facilities; the incessant bombardment by electronic hallucinations to divert us from the depressing sight that has become America and keep us trapped in illusions. We suffer the usual pathologies of impending death. I would be happy to be wrong. But I have seen this before. I know the warning signs. All I can say is get ready.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 19 | June 20, 2018 11:36 AM
|
Everything Trump is doing is leading to an economic crash, as bad or worse than 2008. Republicans are removing all the safeguards. I've seen experts say that they expect the crash before the end of this year.
Of course, if Democrats DO take back the House and/or Senate, Republicans will heap all the blame on them.
This is going to be a nightmare, no two ways about it.
We won't have someone like Obama (with a Dem House and Senate) to fix things this time. So it'll just spiral downwards.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | June 19, 2018 2:36 PM
|
The article loses credibility with this claim:
[quote]Yet the party steadfastly refuses to address the social inequality that led to the election of Trump and the insurgency by Bernie Sanders
Inequality didn't lead to the election of Trump or the insurgency by Bernie Sanders. Racism and Sexism did. Knee-jerk reactions to the first black President and the first woman nominee.
The claim of 'economic anxiety' has been thoroughly debunked.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | June 19, 2018 2:38 PM
|
It's weird how this blog post spends so much time bashing Democrats, trying to blame them, when they aren't the problem, and aren't to blame at all.
This is some bullshit right here.
The coming Collapse -- pretty much inevitable at this point -- is entirely at the feet of the Republicans and their supporters.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | June 19, 2018 2:39 PM
|
Do you have a source for that, R2? I was under the impression that the data supported a widening income gap in the U.S.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | June 19, 2018 2:41 PM
|
Oh, there is one. But that is NOT why Trump was elected, or why Bernie rose as he did. Those two are two sides of the same straight white male supremacist coin, riding a wave of racist and sexist/misogynist resentment.
If it had been about economics, Hillary would have won in a landslide.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | June 19, 2018 2:43 PM
|
R4
R2 is a troll I blocked ages ago.
Racism had very little to do with Trump winning.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | June 19, 2018 4:20 PM
|
Thanks, R6. I thought as much when he/she couldn't come up with a source for the assertion that "The claim of 'economic anxiety' has been thoroughly debunked." I believe that racism and misogyny were factors, but I also believe that the widening income disparity was also a significant factor.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | June 19, 2018 4:25 PM
|
Trump wants a crash so he can buy up real estate on the cheap. He also knows when his wacky comments will cause stock market dips and you can bet he and his cronies are timing stock buys and sell offs around them. Everything he does is about lining his pockets.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | June 19, 2018 4:34 PM
|
OP's article reads like Russian kommentariat porn.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | June 19, 2018 4:35 PM
|
Trump will do what he always does- run up huge debts and run away when the bill comes due. He’s done it multiple times with multiple bankruptcies - hid business “success” has relied on it. Then Democrats will be in charge when the bill comes due and Trump will be scot-free and will point the fingers at someone else. It’s his modus operandi - and the tax cut bill was exactly that. Short term profits that will pump up the economy in near term (while he’s President) at the expense of long term financial health and a coming crash and crushing burden of debt.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | June 19, 2018 4:41 PM
|
r11 Republican governments (not just Trump) have been cutting taxes and raising the national debt since Saint Ronnie Reagan perfected the strategy.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | June 19, 2018 8:42 PM
|
I'm more worried about the coming prolapse.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | June 19, 2018 9:47 PM
|
[quote]Racism had very little to do with Trump winning.
The level of utter clueless stupidity it takes to make this idiotic and laughably false assertion is off the charts.
I'm just laughing at R6. What a fucking moron.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | June 20, 2018 1:27 AM
|
R4/R8, here's your fucking article... Jesus, have you been paying attention for any of the last two years?!?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 15 | June 20, 2018 1:28 AM
|
Another article for those that apparently have no clue how to use Google, like R4, R6, and R8
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 16 | June 20, 2018 1:29 AM
|
R2: Sanders had nothing to do with sexism. Not everyone wanted Rodham Clinton as the nominee based on her policies or her negatives. It is possible to hold that belief and vote accordingly in the primary election, which I and many others did. Who then turned around and voted for her in November. This shit needs to STOP! NOW!
by Anonymous | reply 17 | June 20, 2018 1:33 AM
|
Sanders had everything to do with sexism. He was the "Not-Hillary" candidate for all the sexist, misogynists out there... proven by the virulently and toxically sexist BernieBros who were attacking any and all Hillary supporters (but ESPECIALLY women) all over the internet.
Hillary's positions and negatives were better than Bernie's in every way. Bernie is an intellectually dishonest fraud and an empty suit, as exposed by his disastrous NYDN interview. He lost in a LANDSLIDE of 4 million votes, all on his own, and then pouted and threw tantrums like a sore loser, while simultaneously lying to his cult of supporters about his chances of winning (after being mathematically eliminated by March 15th, 2016). He was a sore loser. He failed to release his taxes as promised. He failed every test of character and leadership. He has no record of any progressive achievements. He's all talk, no plans, no ability to build coalitions, no ability to generate consensus, no ability to shepherd policies through into law. His negatives include taking NRA money, voting with the NRA on critical bills, voting AGAINST universal healthcare back in 93 when it MIGHT have done some good, dumping toxic waste on minority communities, and never voting against military intervention or weapons funding except that one time (which he's milked to death, ironic for a guy nicknamed "Bomber Bernie" by his peers).
If you thought he was a better candidate than Hillary, you were a gullible misinformed moron who paid no attention. Hillary was more truthful, trustworthy, transparent, experienced, qualified, competent, hardworking, and capable than Bernie or anyone else that ran. He would have been SLAUGHTERED in a general election against the GOP if he'd actually won the primary (which was never a possibility).
Anyone who didn't vote for Hillary in the general enabled Trump's win, and owns all this shit that is happening now. That's just a mathematical, statistical fact. Tell all those kids ripped away from their parents that the purity of your ego was more important than their family. Have fun. Dumbasses.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | June 20, 2018 1:41 AM
|
Thanks for that article, R15. Obviously, I'm not as well-informed as you are, and I appreciate your taking the time to find that article.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | June 20, 2018 11:36 AM
|