Saw ANGELS IN AMERICA on Bway--Got to see Lee Pace's weiner!!

You mean "wiener"?

nice! thanks for the update. anything else you observed/would like to describe is welcome.

Good for Lee Pace for having some balls. Russell Tovey was not willing to show his dick in the role.

Thank you, OP. I have a nice visual that should last me until I get tickets.

I want to see this Pace person's naked body. Likn please

Why is there no Garfield dong? That's the only thing that could make me sit through this a fourth time.

[quote]Likn please

Here you go.

Dong is life.

If you're gonna brag at least tell us how big is his peenie and how long was it exposed on stage? Did it flap about? How close were you? Was there a reaction from the audience?

You people are so obsessed with penises it's like you don't have any.

I have a penis, r10. But it is my penis, with which I am utterly familiar. Andrew Garfield's penis is one I've never seen before. Of course I'm interested.

You're not a gay man, are you? Or if you are, you're one of those ass queens, right?

Details details details I want details.

No Garfield peenie. He takes off his shirt to show a nice chest, but no peenie

The Angels in America done at the Signature Theatre in NYC about 7 years ago was excellent too. This one seems to have some new language. I think Kushner has continued to work on the second play.

Nathan Lane is fantastic too. He plays the same role he always does, but it fits perfectly. He's acting highlights so much of the humor in Roy Cohn's character that most others miss.

I think Andrew Garfield overdoes the "gay" a bit, but he's still good.

R13 I want details of lee's dick

Lee's dick wasn't especially huge. It was soft, so difficult to know. He did look like he had big balls and a nice bush.

Is he cut or uncut?

FAIL!

0/10

It was difficult to to see since he was moving around the stage after he took his clothes off.

Cut and very suckable.

Pace is extraordinarily handsome in person. Very tall with a nice (not overly muscular) body.

Richard is a very lucky man

Is Lee's appendage eligible for a special Tony?

"Peenie"? Ewww.

Some of these posts seem straight out of 1998.

There are billions of naked men - AND THEIR PENISES - to be seen while surfing the cyber superhighway on the world wide web.

Lees dick looked yummy

i barely made it thru the first part.

so dam long

2 much

lee's cock was amasing tho, and his hot bod, i did see dat

(why can i not stand nathann land??

I can't picture Lane as Cohn.

R22 he’s not dating Richard anymore. He has a new boyfriend

[quote]I think Andrew Garfield overdoes the "gay" a bit

Whatever do you mean?!!

Lane had to restrain himself if he started chewing the scenery his character Max Bialystock from the producers came out.

[quote]I can't picture Lane as Cohn.

It might have worked if I'd never seen Lane in anything. But no, he was not Roy Cohn. Every time he stops talking, I sensed he was waiting for laughs from the audience, as usually happens with Nathan Lane.

Nathan Lane couldn't be anyone other than Nathan Lane. He's less Roy Cohn than a nasty Nathan Lane.

Garfield's shrieky minstrelsy got on my very last nerve! He seemed to be channeling Paul Lynde at times.

I liked the Taymoresque Angel best. The whole affair played more for laffs than in 1993.

Andrew Garfield can do no wrong IYM.

R11 I fuck a man, not his penis, so I'm more interested in a man's looks as a whole picture.

r35, since I'm not going to get to fuck Andrew Garfield—unlike you, apparently—I have to settle for what I can look at. Penises included.

Are you that "I don't fuck body parts. I fuck feelings" weirdo?

Garfield is ugly and obnoxious I don't see the appeal. He's also one of those virtue signal SJW parrot types. Unbearable. Not an original thought in his tiny head.

R36 Who knows. I get around.

Nope, I just don't get the obsession with body parts. I mean, face, yep. A whole body, yep. But if you were a talented artist, would you want to draw a penis? Okay I get it when it's about a special man. You really like someone, maybe even in love with him, or find him beautiful, you want to know all about them. But the same people go to every penis thread or ask about them irl.

Anyway something did get me curious. He's 6'5, then means unless he is extremely well endowed with a length just as unusual as his towering height, it wouldn't look big at all. So--did it?

R39 No, it looked like he stepped out of a cold bath.

R40 Shivering? xd

If Lee Pace stepped out of my cold bath, I would waste no time in warming him and his weiner/wiener.

Nathan Lane was great! He made the part funny and empathetic, something I’ve nevr seen before.

Sure Lane basically plays the same character no matter what play he does, but it fit well this time.

[quote]Richard is a very lucky man

*bursts into tears*

R43 Cohn was not funny nor does that sack of putrid dead meat deserve our empathy. Check yourself

Seeing both parts today, looking forward to it.

R46 Don't forget to come back afterwards and spill all the tea.

R47 imagines Lee and Andrew are going to sit and gossip with r46?

R42 Yeah looking at his pics dressed, he must have an amazing body.

[quote]I saw lots of celebrities--even used the urinal right after David Duchovny--he's looking old at 58!

Did you say anything to him? And is he short in person?

F&F for R7. What kind of backwoods hick buys Broadway tickets through Broadway.com? The fees are nearly $40 a ticket!

Where do you buy them, r51? Tell us. Please.

Sadly, disappointing. Saw the original in LA in 1992/1993. Incredible! This version has major vocal issues: tons of screaming with no vocal support, so its a mess. Pace and the women who play the angel and Harper are terrific, as is the Belize actor. Nathan Lane is playing Nathan Lane playing someone mean....but he doesn't let that stand in the way of the schtick to get the laughs (Ron Liebeman played Cohn in LA and was truly magnificent and terrifying. Al Pacino's version is the HBO special was incredible). Garfield adopted a bizarre vocal style that made him appear to be channeling Vivian Leigh in Street Car Named Desire...complete with constant pearl clutching. Its still an incredible piece of work and hard work for the actors. I just wish they had been helped to make better choices vocally and otherwise. :(

Lane too Irish, despite first name.

Nathan is not his first name. If I recall correctly, it is Joseph. He actually took the name from Nathan Detroit.

R53 What about the appendage in question?

I saw it in London at the NT. I did not like it at all. Nathan was horrible and I never believed Garfield. The production was awful. I had seen the original Broadway, the Off-Broadway and, of course, the HBO several times. I am still surprised it crossed the pond. It is not doing very well at the box office.

R57 Seems to be the critics' darling, though.

Well R52 you don’t have to pay any fees if you go directly to the box office, but if you don’t want to do that, almost all shows are sold through Telecharge and Ticketmaster online and via telephone. You can also go to the TKTS booth for discounted tickets, if you’re cheap and want to buy day of (or day before for matinees). It is 2018, comparison shopping is pretty easy to do.

Now back to discussing Lee Pace’s member.

r45, that’s the genius of Lane’s portrayal- he shows Cohn as a full human being. Personable yet a piece of shit

It’s always so pathetic when the chorus of gays come out with, “I saw the original and la-dee-da...”

R50 Duchovny seems like he’s about 5’10 or so

R53 here again....I didn't buy Lane or Garfield for a minute. Its just not credible. Both are fine actors, and Lane in BIRDCAGE is pure genius. From LA to NYC to the HBO special, I still think the HBO is the knockout. Mary Louis Parker, Streep, Pacino, Emma Thompson, Jeffrey Wright. POWERHOUSE.

Pace's piece: nice cock. If you were expecting a 12" baby arm to tumble out, then you will be disappointed. But seriously: is that the requirement now?

Discounted. Why pay more?

We already talked about this in the theatre thread like two threads ago. His penis does not deserve a thread. Penis was regular. Body was regular. Face looks old. Like pushing 50. That hard up guys?

Garfield was born in the US but moved to England as an infant, right?

So is he cut or uncut?

R63 Come on: details. It's not about the size but the general aesthetic.

R65 Is that the impression he gives in person? I saw some video from the AiA premiere and no way he is pushing 50. Late thirties, handsome. That seems to be his real age too.

^^^to me, yes. He looks very old. I'm 38 and we look at least 10 years apart.

Mezzanine far from being sold out last Wednesday evening. You could probably do OK at the TKTS booth if you don't mind the time to get tix.

[quote] Garfield was born in the US but moved to England as an infant, right? So is he cut or uncut?

Garfield is Jewish, so likely cut.

R70 Come on, for those things nothing beats the front row. Close and personal.

R65 He lost a lot of weight recently, I think it makes his face look harder, thus older.

Pace looks especially sexy in the suit he wears most of the time during the play.

R74 Even sexier than in the birthday suit? xd

[quote]Lane in BIRDCAGE is pure genius.

[quote]I still think the HBO is the knockout.

Agreed, and thus again we salute Mike Nichols.

Saw the NT screening and thought Lane was solid but didn't bring enough to erase the indelible Pacino. Garfield's queen act didn't though jar for me and compelled in its own right.

Interested to read that it's not a hot ticket. Had a skirmish here re: the NT transfer when a poster was sure it would fail on B'way for plentiful reasons. Hope not, but doubtless 'I told you so' hovers.

I like the old Broadway theatres. There are no urinal dividers. You can piss with the hoy poloi and sneak a pic at their dicks...and vice versa.

This was the first time that, during Lane scenes in Perestroika, I thought the play really needed to be seriously trimmed down. The fucker never died, it took him like, three or four long scenes and instead of creating dramatic tension it just bored me to death. Die already! Maybe it is because I saw the two parts together on a Saturday but Perestroika really needs to be cut down.

I am surprised that the critics were so forgiving of the production's many flaws (design, costumes, accents....) Has the director ever been to Utah? Does she know how they look, speak and act (according to Kushner's stereotypical reading?) I so wish it was better but the play feels more like a relic and it should resonate even more today (not just the Trump-Reagan connection). The whole "The cracker who wrote the anthem" speech had no impact whatsoever when I saw it at the NT; I hope it lands better now.

That line got applause at the performance I attended last Wednesday.

That line, which should be a huge applause maker, just wasn’t said the right way in this production. There should have been a mild pause prior to saying it so it stands out. Instead it’s just said in a long running sentence.

I thought the actor playing Belize would not cross the pond for sure.

"Instead it’s just said in a long running sentence." [r80] It is truly an aria....the audience should explode. "just wasn’t said the right way in this production" I felt that most of the dialogue (again, I saw it in London) did not sound right. It is not just diction but the rhythms were wrong. Even Prior's beautiful closing monologue did not carry the necessary emotion and importance. But, I must have been the only one.

Belize was the best one. The worst was the mother with her irish accent. Or whatever it is. So unprofessional. There were lots of slip ups with the nurse/angel too.

Why didn't Tovey cross the pond? Not that I mind since I entered the thread for Pace impressions but still.

R84, because Americans demand dong. Tovey only wanted to show ass.

ANGELS AND GYPSY----2 SHOWS I COULD WAIT ANOTHER DECADE TO SEE

R85 Even if said dong is magnificent I doubt people sit there for 7 hours just to see one minute of it.

I hate "cross the pond." I wish it would stay on one side or the other.

I sat through 7 hours of the filmed version in hopes of seeing Garfield dong. So frustrating.

Grease that donger up dude!

Tovey's TV show, Quantico, resumed production and he had to be on the west coast for filming.

What about David Duchovny's penis?

r91 As has already been stated numerous times, "Quantico" films in New York.

First: Is there a Whovian in the house? There's something bugging me: during Russell Tovey's (Joe Pitt's) nude scene in England, has anyone screamed "Allons-y, Alonso!"?

Second: so far, how many boys/girls have fallen from the mezzanine during Lee's nude scene?

Third: (a serious one) Does Lee have real chances to be nominated for a Tony as Featured Actor?

And the Tony for "Best Penis in a Featured Role" goes to ...

R95

I haven't seen it. (*sighs*) But, according to reports, there's no doubt this award belongs to Lee's. Some say it's shy and introvert, that it should be more enthusiastic; that it chose a too low profile approach to its role. (Although, it's been said that it warmed up quite a bit during the first performances.) One thing, however, cannot be denied: the audience loves its 20s 'tour de force"! (lol)

Weiner. Peenie.

How old are you boys? 5 ?

Wiener, R97.

This revival was DOA with Brit actors and Garfield. Everyone who wanted to see it saw it on the broadcast. Revive like the original with gay actors and we’ll talk.

I also saw the UK cast on broadcast. Speaking of bad accents. I thought Tovey's was quite bad, and I am a fan. Agreed on most things said about Lane doing Lane and Garfield channeling some Zsa Zsa Gabor affect. Would be interested to see Pace in this.

You were not, R82.

More weiner deets urgently required.

r92, David Duchovny flashes his dick for about one second in [bold]The Rapture[/bold] (1991) and there's a nice close-up ass shot as he plops into bed which offers an excellent rear view of his jiggling junk. Mimi Rogers stars in this. I watched it once on vcr many years ago and can't remember anything about it, not even the rapture parts.

Lee Pace had a semi

Semi?