Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Zuckerberg Claps Back: Facebook Brands Online Trump Supporters Diamond And Silk Dangerous To The Community

I told you we were hardcore. Any questions?

by Anonymousreply 38April 13, 2018 3:47 PM

Link...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1April 9, 2018 1:03 AM

Zuckerberg is just begging to have Facebook regulated as a utility, isn't he?

by Anonymousreply 2April 9, 2018 1:03 AM

[quote]Here is the reply from Facebook. Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:40 PM: “The Policy team has came to the conclusion

Oh dear

by Anonymousreply 3April 9, 2018 1:05 AM

[quote] I told you we were hardcore.

You ain't hardcore, you silly bitch. We told you this about 2 years ago.

About time that bitch ass of yours finally got a clue

by Anonymousreply 4April 9, 2018 1:13 AM

Facebook, you in danger, gurl.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5April 9, 2018 1:21 AM

It's all a big joke

by Anonymousreply 6April 9, 2018 1:30 AM

Stupid decision by Facebook.

by Anonymousreply 7April 9, 2018 1:38 AM

Facebook likely found out that they are a front for some right wing group and doing their bidding

by Anonymousreply 8April 9, 2018 2:58 AM

[quote] Stupid decision by Facebook.

Do you know details behind why Facebook made that decision?

by Anonymousreply 9April 9, 2018 3:28 AM

F B are the new Neo-Nazi fascists

by Anonymousreply 10April 9, 2018 3:38 AM

I like Diamond and Silk. I posted on their Facebook page today.

Facebook should stay out of politics!

by Anonymousreply 11April 9, 2018 3:48 AM

"Diamond & Silk"? Oh...you mean Cubic Zirconia and Rayon!

by Anonymousreply 12April 9, 2018 3:57 AM

So why does a bakery owned by Christians have to bake a cake for a gay wedding that goes against their values when Zuckerberg and Co. is allowed to censor people whose politics they dislike? Facebook is basically a global utility. If they get to pick and choose who to serve based on matters of conscience, surely a small business ought to have the same right.

by Anonymousreply 13April 10, 2018 2:29 AM

[quote] So why does a bakery owned by Christians have to bake a cake for a gay wedding that goes against their values when Zuckerberg and Co. is allowed to censor people whose politics they dislike? Facebook is basically a global utility. If they get to pick and choose who to serve based on matters of conscience, surely a small business ought to have the same right.

If this were strictly about their political views Facebook would be removing all conservatives and certainly the conservatives who have a lot more subscribers and views than those 2 women.

by Anonymousreply 14April 10, 2018 2:41 AM

Facebook considers Diamond and Silk "unsafe to the community" because they consider two black women who can think for themselves a danger to the Democrat plantation because other blacks will listen to them and maybe take off the chains and follow suit. Then how will Democrat win elections without the "guaranteed" black vote that they take for granted?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 15April 10, 2018 2:42 AM

[quote] Facebook considers Diamond and Silk "unsafe to the community" because they consider two black women who can think for themselves a danger to the Democrat plantation because other blacks will listen to them and maybe take off the chains and follow suit. Then how will Democrat win elections without the "guaranteed" black vote that they take for granted?

1. If this were strictly about their political views Facebook would be removing all conservatives and certainly the conservatives who have a lot more subscribers and views than those 2 women. They are not the only black conservatives blogging, vlogging or posting on Facebook.

2. Most Republicans don't and can't think, at least not logically or reasonably.

3. Their viewership is comprised of their fellow deplorables. Regardless of what Facebook does or doesn't do. Their audience will continue to be the same deplorables who voted for Trump. No one else takes them and their rehashed Fox News talking points seriously. They are a joke. And because of the color of their skin even many of their fellow deplorables wouldn't give them the time of day.

[quote] Economic outcomes clearly diverge under Democratic versus Republican presidents – especially for African Americans.

[quote] Under Democratic presidents, black families’ incomes grew on average $895 dollars annually, but grew only by $142 dollars under Republicans. The black unemployment rate fell by a net 7.9 percentage points across the 26 years of Democratic leadership, but went up by a net of 13.7 points during 28 years of Republican presidencies. Across the years of Democratic leadership, black poverty declined by a net of 23.6 percentage points, but grew by three points when Republicans held the White House.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16April 10, 2018 2:55 AM

Hillary Clinton Carries Ninja Squirrel Hot Sauce Everywhere

. . . Clinton’s official affection for hot sauce dates back decades. In 2008, she told 60 Minutes her habit of regularly eating chilies to stay healthy goes back to 1992. At the White House in the 1990s, Clinton boasted a collection of more than 100 hot sauces, according to a December report by the Associated Press. In Monday’s radio interview, Clinton reiterated that her love of hot sauce is partly to do with its health benefits.

“No seriously, hot sauce. I’ve been eating a lot of hot sauce. Raw peppers and hot sauce,” she said. “Because I think it keeps my immune system strong. I think hot sauce is good for you, in moderation.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17April 10, 2018 2:57 AM

R14, I challenge you to link to any content Diamond and Silk posted on Facebook that any reasonable person would construe as "harmful to the community" outside the realm of political preference. Facebook execs boast on company memos that they connect terrorists and abet suicides with blithe indifference. What line did Diamond and Silk cross that the terrorists and Internet bullies apparently didn't?

by Anonymousreply 18April 10, 2018 3:01 AM

America has moved forward as a country. The guilt of slavery and all that crap is getting forgotten more and more. The future of America is Asian, Latino, with a tinge of white.

by Anonymousreply 19April 10, 2018 3:01 AM

[quote] America has moved forward as a country. The guilt of slavery and all that crap is getting forgotten more and more. The future of America is Asian, Latino, with a tinge of white.

Your opinions about the future a relevant here how exactly?

America and Americans have never felt guilty about slavery, the treatment of American Indians or any the other post modern (or for that matter) modern atrocities that help build this country.

And as the wealth gap continues to grow (currently larger than its been in decades) America will move backwards not forwards.

[quote] [R14], I challenge you to link to any content Diamond and Silk posted on Facebook that any reasonable person would construe as "harmful to the community" outside the realm of political preference. Facebook execs boast on company memos that they connect terrorists and abet suicides with blithe indifference. What line did Diamond and Silk cross that the terrorists and Internet bullies apparently didn't

Again:

If this were strictly about their political views Facebook would be removing all conservatives and certainly the conservatives who have a lot more subscribers and views than those 2 women. They are not the only black conservatives blogging, vlogging or posting on Facebook

by Anonymousreply 20April 10, 2018 3:20 AM

[quote]The future of America is Asian, Latino, with a tinge of white.

Man plans, God laughs.

by Anonymousreply 21April 10, 2018 3:27 AM

This seems like a half-ass attempt at seeming responsible by taking out some low-hanging fruit.

by Anonymousreply 22April 10, 2018 3:44 AM

Someone really ought to take those fat black mammies into the woods, if you know what I mean.

by Anonymousreply 23April 10, 2018 3:58 AM

Facebook should at least explain why they consider them "dangerous to the community".

by Anonymousreply 24April 10, 2018 4:03 AM

They are dangerous to the Progressive narrative that black people can't embrace Conservative politics.

by Anonymousreply 25April 10, 2018 4:10 AM

I’m a big gay fan of these free thinking women. Lay off Zuck!

by Anonymousreply 26April 10, 2018 4:16 AM

[quote]If this were strictly about their political views Facebook would be removing all conservatives

Then tell us exactly what it is about. How are two mouthy women of color dangerous to the FB community?

by Anonymousreply 27April 10, 2018 4:21 AM

I ought to have said outspoken rather than mouthy. I only meant that they are mere dispensers of obvious personal opinion.

by Anonymousreply 28April 10, 2018 4:23 AM

[quote] I ought to have said outspoken rather than mouthy. I only meant that they are mere dispensers of obvious personal opinion.

Um hm, like I said before:

. . . because of the color of their skin even many of their fellow deplorables wouldn't give them the time of day. Including you.

by Anonymousreply 29April 10, 2018 5:17 AM

Tokens gonna toke.

It makes me ashamed to be a North Carolinian.

by Anonymousreply 30April 10, 2018 6:15 AM

This is ridiculous.

Governments have to fight Facebook every fucking day so facebook will ban Islamist Terrorist propaganda and remove really dangerous material and images of people being slained.

But they ban two fat black chicks cause they're part of the tiny tiny tiny minority of black people who support Trump cause they're dangerous to the community. When did they call for killing people? When did they call for killing gay people? When did they call for attacks in the street or killing policemen?

Same facebook who sell personal informations and helped Trump to win the election.

Zuckeberg can fuck off.

by Anonymousreply 31April 10, 2018 6:29 AM

[quote]. . . because of the color of their skin even many of their fellow deplorables wouldn't give them the time of day. Including you.

You don't know jack shit. Lots of black people are waking up to the fact that the Democrats don't do shit to aid blacks except subsidize their poverty in exchange for votes.

Dumb white people in the USA today embrace black culture, They aren't as racist as their predecessors because the Jewish media did too good a job of teaching poor rural white guys to want to emulate ghetto black trash via rap music. Most young Deplorables love rap music and are not afraid of blacks or hatefully disposed toward them.

by Anonymousreply 32April 10, 2018 2:44 PM

[quote]Tokens gonna toke.

Good thing there are no tokens running Facebook - just the same totalitarian censors of Thought Crime we've known since the rise of the Bolsheviks.

by Anonymousreply 33April 10, 2018 2:55 PM

Zuck ws asked about them during the hearing, but he didn't have time to respond.

by Anonymousreply 34April 11, 2018 1:17 AM

More like Fakebook.

by Anonymousreply 35April 11, 2018 2:23 AM

Where's Randi?

by Anonymousreply 36April 11, 2018 3:14 AM

I stopped reading at “Claps Back”.

by Anonymousreply 37April 11, 2018 3:16 AM

Good for Facebook

by Anonymousreply 38April 13, 2018 3:47 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!