I am not a psychiatrist or psychologist, but I do question the sanity of them. For example, take the DSM, which is produced by them ---psychiatrists and psychologists. They lump mental illness in with personality disorders when they are not the same. They also confuse the issue as the victims of a psychopath or sociopath are labeled "mentally Ill' all because of their reaction to these toxic, abusive, manipulative people, especially those who develop an anxiety disorder due to the abuse.
The chronic anxiety disorder is considered a mental illness when chronic anxiety is actually a very normal reaction to the manipulation and abuse. Remove the perpetrator from the victims' life and voila, the anxiety gradually and eventually vanishes. They make a mountain out of a molehill and medicate the victims, as if they are crazy for reacting to the abuse.
So no, I do not have a whole lot of confidence or faith in today's mental health experts.
They make something that could be streamlined/simple so complicated for the lay person to learn, understand and comprehend and apply in their everyday lives. In the DSM they've even managed to fuse certain disorders when there was no symptom overlap. They create a whole new disorder all because of a specific negative behavior, just one and a whole new disorder develops and is added to the latest DSM. For example, the difference between those diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder aren't all that much different from those with NPD, Narcissistic Personality Disorder. One example of several. Yet they devise a whole new disorder and complicate something that can be spelled out so simply.
Plus, even the experts agree to disagree. They don't agree on *many* disorders and psychological issues or the etiology of them. So there's that too.
One of the "many" is that psychopathy and sociopathy are so close (not identical but close enough) that the terms can be used interchangeably. Some say yes, and others say no.... the latter is because some experts claim that there are clear and discernible differences. But they are even divided on that issue. There isn't much these experts agree on. Instead of clarifying and simplifying, they complicate.
In addition, a surprising number of these mental health experts have never lived with (or worked under) a sociopath or psychopath, or other crazy, toxic disordered person, under the same roof, where they would be preaching about them from an experiential point of view, not just a clinical one. Unless you've either lived with these people long-term or worked for them long-term (meaning a few years) you really don't know what their victims know. An occasional unpleasant encounter doesn't count. Neither does one sitting across from you in your office every week, on your leather sofa, where they lack the ability to abuse, overpower, alter your mind, and ruin your life because you are in charge and they have no power over you. The doctor is in charge. The doctor is not their victim.
Most mental health experts' patients are not psychopaths and sociopaths or anti-socials, and other disordered people. That's because these toxic, abusive crazies don't want to be diagnosed. Some go into therapy to play head games with the doctor, but most do not attend. They fear being diagnosed and don't want that on their record. They fear the exposure. So most of their patients are the victims of disordered people who mistakenly think that they are the crazy one. The experts are getting a second-hand account, not an up-close and personal account, along with real-life insights. JMO on the matter.