How utterly marvelous.
Nicole Kidman is getting dragged HARD on Twitter!
by Anonymous | reply 100 | February 6, 2018 3:18 PM |
This replies to that tweet are too fucking priceless, ๐!
"What is a Nicole Kidman."
Verified Account: "She forgot about her two adopted children."
by Anonymous | reply 1 | September 18, 2017 5:05 AM |
The Lange troll is going to flood DL with tons of this shit. F&F
by Anonymous | reply 2 | September 18, 2017 5:05 AM |
OP/R1 = OP/Lange troll
by Anonymous | reply 3 | September 18, 2017 5:06 AM |
R2 That's your problem, lol.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | September 18, 2017 5:07 AM |
OP started these threads:
"Jessica Lange @ The Emmys"
Fierce.
"If Jessica Lange doesn't win the Emmy tonight, I'm shutting the DL down."
And hiring a hitman....
by Anonymous | reply 5 | September 18, 2017 5:07 AM |
Only this deranged weirdo blames an award winner when production doesn't play them off of the stage.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | September 18, 2017 5:08 AM |
The thrashing Nic is getting is well worth an Emmy.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | September 18, 2017 5:09 AM |
It seems Lange ended up the winner after all. lol!
by Anonymous | reply 8 | September 18, 2017 5:10 AM |
I don't think she has a relationship with her adopted children, does she? Aren't they both Scientologists?
by Anonymous | reply 11 | September 18, 2017 5:14 AM |
Lange troll is talking to herself.
Meanwhile, in the real world, Kidman is being hailed for her speech.
Jessica is boozing it up over her loss.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | September 18, 2017 5:14 AM |
How Nicole Kidman Won the Most Competitive Category in Emmys History.
The most crowded category crowns a queen.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | September 18, 2017 5:14 AM |
Nicole is fabulous & I bet she doesn't even bother respond to her deranged, pathetic Twitter critics.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | September 18, 2017 5:17 AM |
Im sorry a handful of comments isnt really a drag. Drama queen op!
by Anonymous | reply 16 | September 18, 2017 5:17 AM |
Gee, somebody must've juggled all those votes that should've gone to Sarandon.
Thanks, Vlad. Heh-heh-heh . . .
by Anonymous | reply 17 | September 18, 2017 5:18 AM |
Aren't the adopted kids not even supposed to talk to her or see her because she is a suppressive person or something?
by Anonymous | reply 18 | September 18, 2017 5:19 AM |
Nicole Kidman is a sick person who comes from a sick, sick family.
She should know a lot about abuse. It's also no surprise she could care less about her two adopted children...
by Anonymous | reply 19 | September 18, 2017 5:20 AM |
The daughter didn't invited Kidman to her sciento marriage. Those kids are brainwashed. Poor Nicole.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | September 18, 2017 5:21 AM |
r19 is the resident Datalounge CLAM.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | September 18, 2017 5:21 AM |
The only one who's sick and deranged here is you, Lange troll:
by Anonymous | reply 22 | September 18, 2017 5:23 AM |
Nicole could have said "CHILDREN" not "my two little girls." She said my two little girls -- twice. If her older children are brainwashed, it doesn't mean she should be erased them from her life, even if she doesn't see them. She could have said, children, and acknowledge them somewhat.
I know the speech was about the "little girls" sacrificing mommy putting them to bed, but she could have found a way to insert the older children into her speech.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | September 18, 2017 5:25 AM |
Twitter has become irrelevant. Everyone has an opinion. Next.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | September 18, 2017 5:29 AM |
R23 but why do that if she doesn't have a relationship with them? The daughter got married and neither Nicole nor Tom was at the wedding.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | September 18, 2017 5:31 AM |
Guess who's got the Emmy that the Lange Troll claimed all this time that was going to Jessica? Well, let's just say that Fatica was crying in the ladies bathroom after the show, worried about the state of her now inexistent career.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | September 18, 2017 5:31 AM |
I'm dying: Lynda Lovon
Lynda Lovon @lyndalovon ยท 2 h Respondendo a @MandiBierly ya but kidman is a bonified movie star and who is Sterling? it isnt about race its about rank and royalty
by Anonymous | reply 31 | September 18, 2017 5:32 AM |
What a tainted win...
by Anonymous | reply 33 | September 18, 2017 5:40 AM |
Jessica is getting dragged HARD on twitter:
by Anonymous | reply 34 | September 18, 2017 5:40 AM |
Poops. The articles are starting to flow in...
by Anonymous | reply 35 | September 18, 2017 5:42 AM |
Ms. Lange, being the true star that she is, would've given a 60 second speech.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | September 18, 2017 5:43 AM |
Oh dear. It's the antiquated soap opera queen, lol. Must you be so obvious, R36. Lmao!
by Anonymous | reply 38 | September 18, 2017 5:45 AM |
It's so strange seeing Nichole Kidman at the Emmys. only because she's such a movie star and she's so synonymous with the golden globes and the Oscars, and other industry movie events. But congrats to her.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | September 18, 2017 5:51 AM |
R40 A movie star? Lol. :::sigh:::
by Anonymous | reply 41 | September 18, 2017 5:56 AM |
Yikes. It's getting choppy out there.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | September 18, 2017 6:41 AM |
[quote]but why do that if she doesn't have a relationship with them?
... because it is the mature thing to do. Plus, she can be the bigger person on record by acknowledging them.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | September 18, 2017 6:46 AM |
R44 agreed
by Anonymous | reply 45 | September 18, 2017 6:48 AM |
Yeah, they went on too long but isn't it the fault of the producers rather than NK or EM? It's not like the music started and they said "wait I'm not finished," demanded the music stopped, and continued to speak. In those situations people lose the concept of time and a minute flies by. Always seems to me the majority of winner on award shows (unknown to A List) continue with their speeches until the cue to wrap it up starts.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | September 18, 2017 6:49 AM |
Why does everything have to be about race?
by Anonymous | reply 47 | September 18, 2017 7:05 AM |
Yikes
by Anonymous | reply 48 | September 18, 2017 5:12 PM |
Would it occur to anyone that perhaps the Scientology kids where told to tell Nicole to not refer to herself as their mother?
by Anonymous | reply 49 | September 18, 2017 5:38 PM |
I've been turned off to Kidman since I found out that she was promised an Oscar as part of the deal for marrying Cruise.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | September 18, 2017 5:50 PM |
R90 Source?
by Anonymous | reply 51 | September 18, 2017 6:12 PM |
That's not "dragging Kidman", it's just the usual desperate grievance-mongering, race-baiting bs from the usual suspects.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | September 18, 2017 6:21 PM |
R50 is that really true? Wow if so!
by Anonymous | reply 53 | September 18, 2017 6:24 PM |
R52 You do know it's not just black people tweeting and it's not just about Sterling being cut off.
They're actually making fun of her speech, which was overwrought, and the fact that she won. She's truly getting it from all sides.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | September 18, 2017 6:32 PM |
I don't dislike Nicole Kidman--she pursues riskier material than most other actresses at her level, and she can be quite good in the right role. That being said, I don't enjoy hearing her speak publicly. She comes across as rather self-important and a bit entitled. Sorry to break it you, Mrs. Urban, but winning an Emmy isn't going to do much to help women suffering from domestic abuse.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | September 18, 2017 6:39 PM |
Maybe because Nicole Kidman has been an A-list for roughly thirty years and barely anyone knows who that actor is?
So, let me get this straight, the race baiters took an issue that had nothing to do with race and turned it into a race issue? And are using the veil of inclusion and representation to bully a woman on Twitter for speaking longer than a man did?
It's such obvious hypocrisy. These people's politics are convenient and only matter when it gives them the chance to air a grievance.
It was so stupid of the Emmys to pander to this SJW mindset mostly because, even if you do everything right, have diverse presenters and winners, and rattle off how terrible Trump is, people who are perpetual victims will warp the truth in every way to allow them to keep being victimized.
And in the process of accommodating this mindset, the Emmys alienated mostly everyone who isn't a victim and the ratings plummeted as a result.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | September 18, 2017 6:43 PM |
I wonder how Kidman and Moss manage to be so chummy since Kidman has been branded a Suppressive Person by the cult Moss belongs to.
I love Moss as an actress though.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | September 18, 2017 6:43 PM |
In Kidman's defense, it's true she did not deserve the award over Lange, but she couldn't help it that she benefited from the most political Emmys ever. Almost every award was given for a political or affirmative action reason instead of merit. It was great for the award winners, but it really sucks for all the talented people who should have gotten an award last night but didn't .
by Anonymous | reply 58 | September 18, 2017 6:44 PM |
It also killed whatever credibility the Emmys had left, R58. I honestly feel bad for a lot of the winners. There will always be quotations around these wins. It isn't clear if they got it on merit or because of their POC status.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | September 18, 2017 6:47 PM |
How awful in this day and age to have such ridiculous public insults that go on and on because so many yahoo's think they have an opinion, an informed opinion at that.
Gone is Hollywood as we knew it. Forever.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | September 18, 2017 6:52 PM |
As great as Jessica Lange was in Feud, she already has three Emmys.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | September 18, 2017 6:52 PM |
[quote]It also killed whatever credibility the Emmys had left, [R58]
Those were gone the first time [italic]Friends[/italic] won anything.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | September 18, 2017 6:54 PM |
Jessica got beaten up in Feud and moaned loudly like she did in Postman.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | September 18, 2017 7:14 PM |
R53, of course it's not true. It presumes that Tom Cruise has the power to guarantee someone an Oscar, and yet he has never used this power to get one himself. He campaigned hard for each of his nominations, so we know he wants one.
And it ignores the fact that Kidman had several viable opportunities to get an Oscar before "The Hours," yet she was never even nominated until "Moulin Rouge!," released after the marriage ended. And those films (To Die For, Portrait of a Lady) were released during the height of Cruise's popularity and power in Hollywood.
Even assuming that the Cruise-Kidman marriage was a sham contract, he couldn't have promised an Oscar and she wouldn't have needed that guarantee no matter her ambition. Being the wife of a Hollywood megastar even with the promise of a Rita Wilson level career would have been all she needed to sign on the dotted line.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | September 18, 2017 7:15 PM |
R61 Then it should've gone to Sarandon or Witherspoon.
This "A list celebrity", with her paid hype and press, came nowhere near Lange, Witherspoon, Coon or Sarandon.
The four films she appeared in at Cannes earlier this year coupled with her fashion whoring really gave her the leg up this year.
She couldn't even drum up the enthusiasm Sarah Paulson did for her meh work in American Crime Story.
What's really irritating is that this monotone mess has given the same constipated performance her entire career, equipped with the same red-ironed-straight-to-a-fry hair, and because she's managed to turn herself into a "fashion girl", noticed more for her dresses than her work, she's suddenly "one of the greatest actresses ever". Seriously, ๐.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | September 18, 2017 7:16 PM |
[quote]Coon
Watch it, R65
by Anonymous | reply 66 | September 18, 2017 7:19 PM |
Why should she acknowledge those people who refuse to acknowledge her as their mother? I see nothing wrong with what she did. The old fashioned would love to keep up the sanctity of motherhood in a world that doesn't support anything but the image of the unselfish and loving woman who stoically stands against the abuse and disrespect. Hypocrisy is rife in this country.
by Anonymous | reply 67 | September 18, 2017 7:20 PM |
R66 ๐
by Anonymous | reply 68 | September 18, 2017 7:21 PM |
Lots of lawyers and a whole cult made this possible. Don't blame Nicole. Tom should be brought up on contempt of court charges for undermining the relationship of the children and their mother. That this didn't happen speaks volumes about what kind of power men have over women in this culture to label them whatever they choose to serve their own purposes.
by Anonymous | reply 69 | September 18, 2017 7:25 PM |
[quote]I know the speech was about the "little girls" sacrificing mommy putting them to bed, but she could have found a way to insert the older children into her speech.
Oh, I totally agree. She could have said she has two other children but they live at the Clam Casino and are so totally brainwashed they are incapable of wiping their own butts.
Would that work for you?
The clam kids aren't her children. They don't consider her to be their mother. Why should she acknowledge them when they don't acknowledge her?
by Anonymous | reply 70 | September 18, 2017 7:36 PM |
They've made it publicly clear they do not want her acknowledgement. If you ask me, she was being a good mother by respecting that.
by Anonymous | reply 71 | September 18, 2017 7:42 PM |
Katie Holmes called them Mom once too. She said so in an interview when she was first married to Tom.
by Anonymous | reply 72 | September 18, 2017 7:43 PM |
The church is their mother, father, and whatever else it tells them. The very definition of CULT.
by Anonymous | reply 73 | September 18, 2017 7:57 PM |
And here we are putting the blame on the children, whilst Cruise AND Kidman both continually exposed them to the church and it's strange practices all for their own stardom.
We're living in some truly sick times.
by Anonymous | reply 74 | September 18, 2017 8:14 PM |
I think Nicole deserved it for Big Little Lies which was an interesting and timely show with a very hot topic right now - domestic abuse. I only watched a couple episodes of Feud and I can see myself eventually trying to catch up on the rest but I didn't find it as compelling. It felt like the actresses were playing dress up. Another mistake was hiring Susan Sarandon who's become more & more toxic lately. Anyone associated with her was bound to burned too.
It's not Nicole's fault that the This is Us star got played out. It was the camera man who decided to do that disgraceful long shot. I'm not sure what Sterling did to piss off the camera man but that was incredibly rude.
by Anonymous | reply 75 | September 18, 2017 8:31 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 76 | September 19, 2017 12:16 AM |
[quote]Plus, Kidman is weird as fck. Now, that she is free and clear of Scientology, why would she give a care about respecting their rules, if they are rules specifying that she can't acknowledge them?
I meant to say, if THERE ARE rules.
by Anonymous | reply 77 | September 19, 2017 12:17 AM |
[Quote]The Handmaid's Tale steals the story of enslaved black women in the most violent way possible.
LOL, Aura Bogado is the Hispanic short bus version of Ta-Nehisi Coates.
by Anonymous | reply 78 | September 19, 2017 12:24 AM |
Nicole is worth over $200 million so I doubt she cares what you or anyone else say on Twitter. At least she acknowledged that she is an absentee mother. She constantly works and is away from home. And Lange never had a chance. Feud was a bust
by Anonymous | reply 79 | September 19, 2017 12:49 AM |
I wish the camera had cut to Moss and her mother while Kidman was mentioning her 'two children'.
by Anonymous | reply 80 | September 19, 2017 1:13 AM |
[quote]Feud was a bust
No, it wasn't.
[quote]At least she acknowledged that she is an absentee mother.
She was only speaking of her two darling daughters -- not those prop kids she was given back in the day.
by Anonymous | reply 81 | September 19, 2017 1:28 AM |
I wanted lange to get it, too
Does that make me a troll?
by Anonymous | reply 82 | September 19, 2017 8:24 AM |
R82 No.
by Anonymous | reply 83 | September 19, 2017 12:18 PM |
This is why I despise social media and refuse to participate. Not one of the people dragging Nicole Kidman knows her or her clam children. They have no idea what went on between them or what was said, and yet here they are with their venomous characterizations of people that reduce everyone to the lowest common denominator.
Some pea-brain is mad because Kidman was given more time than the pea-brain's current crush, so the pea-brain goes off on Nicole Kidman, using her parenting history to attack her. Does the pea-brain have children? Is the pea-brain the best parent on earth? Does the pea-brain meet his or her own parenting standards? Why do I doubt it?
Social media is toxic.
by Anonymous | reply 84 | September 19, 2017 1:50 PM |
More proof that social media is a sick and sorry place. Everyone feels entitled to weigh in on something that is NONE of their business.
by Anonymous | reply 85 | September 19, 2017 1:51 PM |
Here's one: "Most Overrated Actress of the World"
by Anonymous | reply 86 | September 19, 2017 1:52 PM |
R84, you said it far better than I could. Must be something in the air today. I left Fb, months ago, and left an article and picture of Robert Mercer on the page to alert people. More than a few friends emailed me to tell me I was paranoid. I take no satisfaction in having the last laugh when I know how dangerous social media really is. I lasted on Twitter for about a week after quickly discerning how damn mean Twitter 'culture' is.
by Anonymous | reply 87 | September 19, 2017 2:22 PM |
We get some of that on DL too, but at least on DL you can tell them to shut up and sit down or ignore them.
by Anonymous | reply 88 | September 19, 2017 4:04 PM |
R84 last month, after RAY DONOVAN started its 5th season, I went on YouTube to see any current interviews with him regarding the show. In my quest, I came across a clip when he was on Ellen last summer to promote the 4th season. Though I don't watch her, I normally enjoy Ellen's videos, because they can be hilarious and the comments just as funny. HOWEVER, the comments for this particular video were toxic! A lot of them are accusing LIev Schreiber of pedophilia/incest. Very recent comments, too. I was like WTF? Isn't defamation a dangerous thing, as far as legality? I'm surprised Ellen hasn't disabled the comments.
by Anonymous | reply 89 | September 19, 2017 8:40 PM |
R40 she attended the Emmys 5 years ago when she was nominated for that HEMINGWAY & GELLHORN biopic. She lost to Julianne Moore in GAME CHANGE.
by Anonymous | reply 90 | September 19, 2017 9:04 PM |
Wow.
by Anonymous | reply 91 | September 19, 2017 10:02 PM |
[quote]Fatica was crying in the ladies bathroom after the show, worried about the state of her now inexistent career.
Her what?
by Anonymous | reply 92 | September 20, 2017 2:26 AM |
R92 lol.
by Anonymous | reply 93 | September 20, 2017 2:51 AM |
Kidman never supported Shitler's presidency. Her statement seemed more resigned to it, than anything else. She's ONLY ever donated to Democratic politicians, and she's given around 30,000 dollars in total to various Democratic politicians. She supported Clinton in the primary against Obama. She has always said that she's primary concerned with the rights of women and children.
Jeebus, let's stop smearing allies.
by Anonymous | reply 94 | September 20, 2017 3:44 AM |
R92 oxford dictionaries definition: inexistent ADJECTIVE
rare Non-existent.
by Anonymous | reply 95 | September 20, 2017 6:07 AM |
R95 That's Kidman for yah!
by Anonymous | reply 96 | September 20, 2017 2:51 PM |
Well said, r84. We need more voices like yours in the world. Bravo.
by Anonymous | reply 97 | September 20, 2017 3:13 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 98 | February 4, 2018 3:58 AM |
maybe the director of the broadcast should be blamed and not Nicole?
I'm not a fan of hers (meaning of her work), but she was pretty great in Big Little Lies
by Anonymous | reply 99 | February 4, 2018 4:33 AM |
People need to get over themselves. Free speech!
by Anonymous | reply 100 | February 6, 2018 3:18 PM |