I tried to get a picture of a hot guys ass on the subway

I would have trained the camera on her and said "just needed one more for my fat bitches on the subway" collection

It is your right to take that picture OP. It is also her right to yell at you about it.

Fucking fat Frau SJWs !!! They always ruin it for everyone

If someone thought I was hot enough to take a stealth shot of my body, I wouldn't care.

That would've been my response to the bitch.

Did the guy with the hot ass give you a nasty look, OP? Did he know he was the one being photographed?

People need to get over their "How dare you photograph me without my permission!" sanctimoniousness. How do people think street photographers get their work? By ASKING first? No, they see something worth shooting and they do it.

If you're in public, there is no law protecting you from being photographed. Mother fuckers need to get over themselves.

And no, I've never been yelled at for taking anyone's picture, but I've thought about what I would say if it happened. I have, on occasion, taken shots of people if I liked their outfit, or if I thought it would make a good Instagram, or if there was something else remarkable about them that I wanted to immortalize.

fuck her

theoretically....

You are a creep, OP.

Can you explain why he's a creep, R6?

Some people always say "that's creepy" with no explanation behind it. What is creepy about it?

He just glared at me for a moment, mildly curious but didn't say anything. I really got out of there so fast I didn't stick around for any further reaction. The girl must have been watching me the whole time to happen to catch that I had the camera function opened on my phone, trying to snap a picture of his ass.

In case anyone is curious, he was about 6" tall and Asian, with a meaty and firm looking ass in sweat pants. They have a perfect view of the contours of his ass muscles and his crack.

*gave, not have

What a shame, after hot guy presented hole and everything.

Op, you're a shithead. Maybe the guy doesn't think he's cute. Now you left him wondering if you were taking his photo for some nefarious reason, like posting it online to ridicule him. Nice work, jackass.

He's a 6 inch tall Asian?

You are a creep Op.

It's creepy to take pictures of strangers on a train, ass without their knowledge or consent. That is what is creepy about it.

You could have some shrine of different body parts of all the people you killed in your mother's basement, assembled into the perfect man.

Fucking creep.

[quote] You could have some shrine of different body parts of all the people you killed in your mother's basement, assembled into the perfect man.

That seems more like the modus operandi of John/PMBT.

Six inches tall eh?

OP also thinks fucking people sleeping is ok, too.

The heavy girl was probably jealous that you weren't going to take a picture of her. Next time take the picture anyway. Screw the self-righteous people.

OP, please come to NYC with that shitty attitude of yours. Someone should have snuck up behind you and knocked you out as you captured it on camera.

[quote]The heavy girl was probably jealous that you weren't going to take a picture of her.

Yeah she's definitely a hater.

Let me see if I've got this straight: it's okay for a newspaper or a news website to show my pic without my consent, but it's NOT ok for me to take someone's photo without consent AND NOT POST IT PUBLICLY? What is wrong with this picture, folks?

[quote]It's creepy to take pictures of strangers on a train, ass without their knowledge or consent. That is what is creepy about it.

Why is it creepy?

Yes, I know you said "without their knowledge or consent", but we're talking about taking a picture, not RAPING someone, and it's happening IN A PUBLIC PLACE.

People in public places get videotaped, filmed, photographed, all the live long day, everywhere in the world.

The idea that this tall Asian would assume he was being made fun of is retarded. If he was fit, not short, wearing athletic pants and has a nice ass, there's no way in hell he would come to that conclusion. It would be different if the OP were taking THE FAT GIRL's picture, and in that case: see my previous 2 paragraphs.

You hysterical ninnies saying "That's CREEPY! You're a CREEP!" are self important, upright, ridiculous queens/bitches. Nothing was violated. You're probably just envious because no one wants to take pictures of your gay asses.

Tall Asians with firm asses are extremely rare animals, like angel sharks. You should have taken the pic and said you worked for National Geographic.

Mmhmm.

Is it also creepy to just look at someone's ass in public? I mean, what if I looked at someone's ass and then went home later and recalled that image in my mind and masturbated to the memory?

Would that make me LITERALLY a rapist? Certainly a creep, I know.

So creepy...

r21, is it fucking art? Is his ass a piece of art photography? You are objectifying someone by taking a picture of a portion of his body.

I would have smacked the phone out of your hand. It is an invasion of privacy.

You weren't going to show it to anyone OP? You weren't going to post it on here, DL or were you going to just jerk off to it at home by yourself.

R18 it was a subway ride in NYC. There's plenty of people of both sexes who like to take a covert snap of an attractive person.

And I meant 6' not 6" of course. And yes, Asians that tall with great bodies are a nice surprise.

I still think that bitch should have minded her own business, she wasn't defending someone helpless. This guy was a big boy and I'm sure wouldn't give this girl a second look.

Leering at someone's ass, whether they are male or female, is never ok. Taking a picture of someone without their consent for sexual purposes is probably illegal, if it is not it should be.

OP, would you be cool with it if some random guy walked up to one of your young neices or nephews and started flashing in a public area?

I've never understood how this guy gets away with it (and yes, he posts them publicly).

Say hi to the niece/nephew troll at R28. You go gurl.

OP, disregard the envious queens. If people are out in public, they are fair game. Now if you were thinking of publishing the image, that might require permission. That bitch should have minded her own business or pulled the stick out of her ass. With so much real violence going on everywhere (such as those horrible acid attacks in London), that cunt needs to get a life and get fucked by the person of her persuasion. A cock or pussy in her mouth will shut her up.

9 times out of 10, when someone takes a picture of a stranger without his/ her knowledge it's because the "photographer" is a douche like the OP.

R27 belongs on a SJW Tumblr

OP is clearly a rapist. Most evolved, liberated folks would agree. Rapist.

OP, I can't hear you. This ankle bracelet is cutting off circulation to my brain.

R34 is triggered

Well, do we get to see a photo of this stud muffins butt?

No, because the fat bitch opened her yap and fucked things up!

R36, the last thing that person needs is another sandwich.

[R32] Great link, made even better by the inclusion of the Reddit user's sincere apology for what they had done (not one of those "sorry IF anyone was hurt" apologies).

I am going to marry r1 one day.

When I was young and hot, it kind of bothered me when I was peeped on by neighbors. In some ways it was my own fault because I was rather naive. Because I never looked in other peoples windows, I did not think anyone would look in mine with binoculars.

And now you'd pay them to look.

This is my favorite so far from the sleazy instagram R29 linked to. In some measure it compensates for the loss of OP's butt pic.

OP, how many pictures were taken of you when you were trying to take this picture? Let's see, is there a perv on the subway site? I wonder if they got a full face shot or just a back shot as you ran away? What were you wearing?

Exactly R44. The fleece sweatpants showed details like in that Instagram. And to whoever suggested I was going to post it somewhere, no. I was going to probably text it to two friends of mine who are also into butts to get their reaction and then delete it off the camera roll.

OP, which famous asses do you like?

Opie, it was not a respectful thing to do. Don't come crying to us when someone beats the shit out of you.

This really happened!!!

r46 Oh well that's fine, because everyone around you has creep ESP and knew your intentions were to just masturbate over it without disseminating it. Well, OK then.

You got caught doing something unethical and perhaps illegal in some places. Just admit it and move on. Assuming this even happened of course; the SJW inclusion looks suspect.

You're an idiot, R50.

It is not illegal in a public place to take a picture of another person. It is not even creepy. Street photographers do it all the time.

And the idea that "leering" at someone's ass is just as bad and part of "rape culture" is so pathetic and untrue I don't even know what to say. If that's how someone feels, then they'd better stay home. Never go outside. You might get looked at.

How fragile and ridiculous you idiots are. I hope you all get STARED AT relentlessly until you DIE of your injuries sustained in the EYE-RAPE.

r51 I never mentioned rape culture, and I'm not equating the two. However, it's not a stretch of the imagination to be creeped out by a guy staring at your ass, then taking picture of it in a public place. It's also not an unreasonable assumption that it could end up online, since this thread just linked an IG page that does just that. That is totally different than taking a 'street candid', although even then I don't like it without permission.

Taking a photo of someone without their consent is LITERALLY killing them!!!!!!

Sparkle pony, RAPE is a crime. So called "Rape culture" is a made-up term used on campuses, denoting, who-even-knows-what, by young men and women who think they can drink themselves into oblivion, without a single unpleasant consequence.

OP, if you weren't being a creep, why did you run off that train in shame. You were being creepy, just fucking admit it and let your creep flag fly.

You were going to pass his delicious butt pic to 2 of your friends, they would send it to 2 of their friends and so on and so on, till his ass is viral and plastered all over the internet. Some fat ugly men will steal his butt pick and put it on a dating site to get more pictures from more unsuspecting men. Till one sends it to you on Craigslist and asks you to meet up with him. You forget that this was the original picture you passed to 2 friends and he meets you, chops off your head and stuffs your body into an suitcase and mails it to Ann Coultor labeled from - Delta Airlines.

If you're out in public and don't want people looking at your ass wear a fucking Gurkha>

Burka

I like your style, R55.

OP you are dead wrong. A perv, wanting a photo for your sick interest. Good thing some guy didn't beat the shit out of you. Deservedly so, you creep. Sneaking photos of your turn-ons is sick. Sisssy-brag all your want, but you have no right to do this.

I did hop off the train, it's true. But only because I didn't want there to be a possible problem although like I said the guy just glared quickly. I'm not the type who would brawl in public. Who knows if he would have wanted to start an actual fight but I bet if he knew I was trying to take a picture of his ass he'd probably be happy. Why else work out so hard and wear something that shows it off? He's probably proud of it!

Using SJW as an insult is a dead giveaway that you're a Republican. And probably a gross, turtle-looking Mitch McConnell lookalike. I bet the guy you were creeping on was repulsed by you.

OP, I took a photo of you while you were waiting for the train.

You were being a very rude, tacky pig, OP.

You deserved it.

After you took his picture, you should have lifted your caftan, turned around and exposed your mussy to him, and shouted "YUM!" loudly enough for him (and everyone) to hear.

Sorry OP. Team Fat Girl. She has a point, a valid one.

So do you, although it seems to be on your head.

What is it with men and boundaries? Especially gay men. Being openly gay is not an invitation to invade someone else's space like that.

It was determined by some supreme court that even taking photos up women's dresses on an escalator in this day and age was no longer actionable. For what it's worth. If you can see it, you are allowed to take a shot of it in public, quite frankly.

(But not in a locker room, changing room, etc. or by hidden camera. But if you are sitting across from me and I want a souvenier, I am absolutely within the law to snap your photo).

The Golden Rule does not apply in all social circumstances, OP.

If you think he was proud of it and wanted to show it off, why didn't you ask his permission to take a photo? Or perhaps you knew you were being a perv and you rightly got called out.

[quote]Using SJW as an insult is a dead giveaway that you're a Republican

I agree, there are more people complaining about SJW's than there are actual SJW's

Is taking someone's picture without asking permission invading "someone else's space?"

Where does one person's space, when touch is NOT involved, start and end?

What if it's a shot of of some person quickly walking by and inludes the person's ass?

Who decides these things?

OP you are a bit creepy but you own it and for that I respect you. Whoever compared OP to Dani Mathers is a fuckwit. She took that locker room photo to deliberately poke fun at another woman's body, and the victim was clearly identifiable. OP just wanted a little butt shot to share among friends. The guy's face wasn't in it and OP clearly wasn't out to humiliate anyone.

I want to know why the fat SJW girl was so fixated on you OP...my theory is she was taking a pic of OP and called him out to deflect attention from her own actions.

The "SJW" insult has been thrown around so many times that it's now meaningless.

For some reason, this reminds me of the 'locker room towel dance' thread.

Ha ha, she got you, OP. And you couldn't think of a good retort, you ran off.

If you are counting, OP, add me to the affirmative list. Ya did good! Sorry, the picture did not get taken. I would have loved it.

Lmfao. A Gurkha is an evolution from the caftan that gay men can choose to wear in public to protect their juicy asses from being snapped by a subway perverts.

Good questions you pose about personal space, and I'm not sure how to answer them.

R74 I would also have loved to see the ass picture!

[quote] Fuck her, does she think she's the consent police?

Yes, as a matter of fact, she does....as does all her neo-marxist,authoritarian ilk.

me too, I'm curious about the tall bootylicious Asian

who obviously didn't care THAT much. Most men won't. Only silly women.

THAT'S the part of the story that's made up.

The same people who's defending this shit were probably the same people getting upset over guys doing the towel dance in the other thread

Re: the personal space argument. People are using the law to argue what is or isn't permissible, but perhaps what should be used is 1) basic manners and 2) communication. If you'd like to take a picture of someone, ask them. If they're okay with it, you get a better picture than you would have by being sneaky. If they're not, you would be rude in persisting and then you deserve to be called out for it.

Right. "Excuse me, sir, do you mind if I take a shot of your ass? Bend over a little, please. Thanks!"

[quote]I would have smacked the phone out of your hand.

You dreadful, wretched, uppity schoolmarm of a cunting cunt. I hope you fall in love with the top of your dreams and he ends up smacking the taste out of your pursed lips, you little shit. Clearly it hasn't happened enough yet, or you'd know how to mind your business.

Were you the bossy little fuck in school who'd always put her hands on her hips and take it upon herself to boss the class around whenever the teacher stepped out of the room?

Ya got a way wit da woids, ya duz!

This is why they hate us.

Taking a picture of someone's ass for self-gratification, grabbing someone by the pussy - what's the dif?

All the squealing and clutching aside, O.P, I believe that you have a right to take a picture with your own property of anything and anyone you like in a public place. I also think that anybody in a public place has the right to say whatever they want to say about your doing it.

Ah but R20 how does anyone on that train KNOW that the OP didn't intend to post the photo publicly on social media? There are too many assholes who sneak photos of strangers in public (of the upskirt type etc) for people to think that you or the OP are doing it out of innocence. Most times when people take photos of strangers in public the whole point is to ridicule the person like that stupid fucking cunt who body shamed the old woman at the gym and got into loads of well-deserved trouble for it. I suspect the OP is the kind of pervert who sneaks photos of naked strangers in the gym locker room as well.

The winner!^^^^^

R90 He's not a pervert but just a normal guy in these modern days and times of technology. It's okay to take a photo of a good looking guy or girl - even a nice ass picture. Deal with it.

R92 If the OP thought he didn't do anything wrong then why did he run off the train (the wrong station even) like a guilty little bitch?

OP, you were in the wrong. Asshole.

How many of you bitching that the OP did nothing wrong are also proponents of "see something, say something" when it comes to suspicious behavior?

Because I didnt want to get into a fight R93 and I couldn't think of a way in that split second to diffuse a possible situation so I figured it was time to retreat. I wasn't ashamed, I was annoyed that the twat even said anything. I wanted that damn picture.

Quit being so self righteous. Photos of handsome men and their bodily parts are all over the internet. If you don't like it then go back to 1965 when gay men were made to feel guilty about enjoying their sexual feelings.

You can blame some of this on those bullshit busybody "What Would You Do" shows on ABC where the world's pearl clutchers come to the rescue by sticking their nose into everything. "You're taking a photo of a clothed backside?! Stop him! NOW!!! Officer?!"

It's always fucking women too. Vomit.

You're a pussy, OP.

The idea that anyone was "violated" in this instance is hysterical. He was clothed. His face wasn't going to be in the picture. It was not going to be a remarkable sort of picture that would make the rounds (no pun intended) on the Internet. And even if it did, the guy would probably never in a million years find out. Even if it ended up on the Internet and someone showed it to him and said "Is this your ass?" the guy probably wouldn't have been able to recognize himself.

And it was not for the purpose of making fun of him, either.

You people are goddamn whack jobs.

Whack jobs and, I can almost guarantee, FEMALE.

[quote]The idea that anyone was "violated" in this instance is hysterical. The 5-year-old was clothed. His face wasn't going to be in the picture. It was not going to be a remarkable sort of picture that would make the rounds (no pun intended) on the Internet. And even if it did, the 5-year-old would probably never in a million years find out. Even if it ended up on the Internet and someone showed it to him and said "Is this your ass?" the 5-year-old probably wouldn't have been able to recognize himself.

R102 Major fail Aunt Sally.

I feel like it's a sliding scale depending on intent. Taking photos to mock people or make horrible memes about them isn't ok. Taking a picture because you think they're hot (and in public, fully clothed) isn't something I'd do but it also isn't something I'd react to the way that chick did.

r98 And that stupid show basically tries to make you feel bad if you mind your own business.

Here is a video of the incident of OP "taking a photo of a guy's ass" as it *really* happened.

Asian guy is on the right, OP is on the left. The woman OP is whining about shot the video.

TLDR: OP acted creepy, was shamed publicly by fat frau, ran crying to DL about it.

You have no right to privacy in public spaces.

That blabby woman that OP encountered was out of line. It was none of her business. If she has some ideas about patriarchal objectification, she should take herself on a jaunt to the Middle East and find out what real oppression is. And if the worst thing that the Asian guy has to contend with is having his ass photographed, he's a lucky SOB. There are enough real problems in the world.

R109 Win!

How was the guy meant to know the OPs intention? Obviously we know the OP was just taking it because he thought the guy was hot. But if I'm the guy I don't know what part of me he's photographing or for what purpose. Maybe he's plastering me all over instagram to mock me? How am I supposed to know?

People here are defending OP because they know his intent but the guy in the photo didn't. His reaction indicated he wasn't overly thrilled about it, probably because he didn't know why his picture was being taken by a complete stranger on the subway. That chick may have had an OTT reaction but that doesn't make OPs behaviour totally ok either.

OP is Donald Trump.

Loud woman should thank her stars he didn't grab her pussy in retaliation.

"Maybe he's plastering me all over instagram to mock me."

What kind of paranoia are we living in here?

Yeah you're so right r113, no unsuspecting person has been mocked on social media. This would have been a first.

R114 Go to bed Sister Mary Morbid.

If the Asian wasn't naked or jerking off, he had nothing to worry about. Fuck social media.

They call you Carl Cleverpants because of your witty comebacks at your fat men's group, don't they r115. Go you!

Ew, this is the thing as straight guys leering at women's tits. "Well, she is wearing an open necked top she must WANT me to leer. " It's all about ME and my wants/needs/cock.

Gross, OP

YOU'RE lucky the guy didn't knock the crap out of you, and steal you're phone.

What a stupid thing for anyone to do in today's world.

But I think you're really the drama queen who crafts a new tale of fiction every day @ DL.

So did you fuck the young dude yet? Tell your sister off? Tell your niece she's a cunt? Tell your elderly mother you hate her? Screw the meth guy again? Make your famous Breakfast Sausage Lasagna again?

It's Fatty McButterpants, r117.

[quote]Yeah you're so right [R113], no unsuspecting person has been mocked on social media. This would have been a first.

And what, exactly, about this hot, tall Asian guy in gym pants with a sexy ass in this situation would have been worthy of mockery on social media? What is the "joke" that the OP was going to tell about this guy? What part of him was going to be made fun of?

Speaking personally, anybody who wants to take a picture or video of me in public is welcome to do so. What the hell do I care? What are they gonna do? It's in PUBLIC— what could I possibly be doing in public that I wouldn't want to be photographed? Standing there looking sexy with my cute butt? Looking at my phone? Oh no, please don't take my picture! So creepy, I feel violated! Please don't put that on social media! How horrifying! Operator, what's the number for 911? Someone just captured my spirit!

Get OVER yourselves, you paranoid freaks.

Leering and photographing are NOT the same thing. Untwist your knickers.

It's dehumanizing and creepily objectifying. I've been on the subway where a guy first leered than took it out and started whacking off. I told him to knock it off; the woman next to me told me I was dressed "provocatively" (I wasn't and yes, I am female). All okay with you, OP? The masturbator technically wasn't "hurting" me, since I was three feet away from him.

Of course that's unacceptable, come on. And that woman was terrible for saying what she did. Hardly the same as taking a photo like OP tried to do.

[quote]if the OP thought he didn't do anything wrong then why did he run off the train (the wrong station even) like a guilty little bitch?

Because he didn't want "hot ass guy" to beat him up.

OP ran off like a little bitch because everyone knew he was secretly taking pictures of a strangers ass because he intended to masturbate over them later.

I bet the Asian was a 12-year-old.

You people be crazy

R126 Exactly my thinking. Butt ugly OP took a stealthy picture of a nice looking ass, because that's the closest he will ever get to one in real life, and then took off running like a headless chicken when confronted by a "SJW".

And now OP is on DL, bitching like a cunt, because things didn't go his way. OP deserves a Purple Heart for being such a brave hero and almost getting injured during his photo mission.

OP skittered off like a cockroach because he knew he was being gross. I'm glad that fat frau called him out on his piggish behavior.

R123 what were you wearing?

While I personally look at a nice ass in public, I wouldn't take a picture of it, because it's just bad behavior and weird. Eating a booger in public is not illegal, but it's still not something I would do, just because it's "not illegal".

However, I have to agree with people calling out OP for running away after the incident. If you do something and you feel the need to run away, because you fear any unwelcome consequence as a result of your behavior, that's when you should know that it wasn't the right thing to do.

You're all on CCTV anyway, first of all. So there is no privacy.

This happened at my gym. I took a pic of an *insanely* hot guy (like 11 out of 10) and the FLASH went off. Some girl saw it and her jaw dropped and she stared at me....and I panicked. I just ran the fuck out of there. I didn't know what would happen. So, I feel your pain OP.

Before I came back, I asked the manager (who I've been friends with for 5 years) if she heard about "someone taking a picture" and she laughed for 1 minute straight. She was like "how horny are you?" and then followed up with "nobody cares unless it's in the locker room, and then I'd have to kick you out - so stop it, but show me his pic next time you're in"

Not everyone is such an uptight cunt. Most people don't care. And this was his side / back. I forgot even why I took it. It wasn't his ass. I think he was just really hot and I truly never saw someone this good looking in ages.

God forbid I post the pic here - the RAGE would blow up my computer . When people post random grindr pics, 1/2 of DL goes apoplectic...as if grindr is some kind of private website. There are websites devoted to exposing ass holes on grindr too, but nobody seems to complain about them.

And I am in a ton of tourist's photos, btw... i just make angry faces and hope they'll get deleted (of the ones I know of - I am sure I am in a lot more). That's life. What are you gonna do.

[quote]Not everyone is such an uptight cunt. Most people don't care.

That's what I thought, r132

False equivalence 133 - this has already been pointed out to you up above, several times.

R133, Please Read R71

Assuming someone is OK with something because you are is a pretty clear sign that you're a self centred asshole.

R133, your post at r102 (comparing this to pedophilia) is disturbing. You are far more creepy than OP and me, quite frankly.

Those who blatantly and publically work on their masturbation banks of strangers, get noticed, get offended that they were noticed, run away frightened, then complain about the people who noticed them have such basic low levels of self-awareness that their opinions of, well. anything, aren't even worthy of a yawn.

OP I see nothing wrong with what you did. Everyone carries a "camera" now and we are all taking photos of any and everything. And while I imagine the dude looked somewhat confused, I promise you that once he thought it over, he was very flattered.

Back in my 20s and 30s I lived in New Orleans, and even though this was long before the era of the camera phone, many people were tourists and carried cameras. At least once or twice a day, someone would take my picture. Occasionally they would ask first, and once in a while they would ask if they could take a picture with me, and I was always happy to oblige.

Those days don't last forever, and as a elder frau now, I am happy to think that there was a time which I was picture worthy.

OP, you are an asshole and an idiot. Seek help. Same goes for all the posters who think OP's behaviour was perfectly acceptable, I don't care how many of those there are.

Fucking idiots. Seriously need an education.

This has been a really interesting thread to read because of the wide range of strong opinions. Just last week I was walking down a street and I saw this handsome guy who was impeccably dressed. Everything was perfect about him -- his hair; his tall, lean body; his stylish clothes; and his beautiful shoes. I really wanted to take a photo of him but didn't know how to ask without seeming creepy. It's so much easier to ask people if it's okay to snap a photo of their dog because they're usually so proud and are flattered. And on a different note, I once saw a young couple sitting on a wall watching the sun set. It was the most beautiful scene, so I asked if I could take their photo from the back (so that you wouldn't see their faces), and they said, "Sure!" I took the photo and showed it to them and they loved it. They asked me to e-mail a high-resolution copy of the photo to them so that they could use it for their wedding invitation! Sometimes something is just too beautiful that you want to capture an image of it, but my personal view is that one should always ask. Unfortunately, I've never been able to figure out an un-awkward way to ask someone like that guy on the street without seeming like a creep.

OP, too bad the adults here couldn't have seen the pic because of all the self-righteous SJW busybodies who think the patriarchy is out to steal their Scooby Snacks.

For shame, Datalounge. You have lost your way. This might be why they hate us! Gay marriage becomes law and you lot become Puritans? Go figure! You've turned into fat fraus.

The morons defending OP and his fellow cowards are missing the point.

It's not the taking of a photo that is the primary concern. Like r141 said, if he had asked to take a photo, or just openly snapped some pics of the surrounding area few would care or notice.

It is the sneakiness. The sneakiness and the fact that OP ran thick away inherently indicates that the photo-taker knew his behaviour is socially unacceptable. It also shows that OP is getting off on the hide and seek thrill of it.

It is the difference between some guy sitting opposite a woman and noticing her legs, or some guy sliding under the bench and sticking his head up her skirt.

You have zero right to privacy when you go into public. Businesses and the government have cameras everywhere. Any asshole with a camera (like the OP) is freely allowed to take a picture of you.

It is silly to get bent out of shape about it. What world do you think you live in?

I think the solution is to speak as loudly to the woman. Either call her "madam" or call her "cunt". Probably the former as there were others there.

"Madam, please mind your own business..."

Nobody is called Miss or Madam these days.

R146 I guess you don't fly too frequently, huh?

OK, I'm wrong. You win, R146.

About a month ago, I was having lunch on a restaurant patio with some friends. After we'd been there for a while, a friend of mine said "I think those people are taking a picture of you..."

It was a girl and guy at the next table--they were in my peripheral so I couldn't see what they were doing, but my friends could. I turned around to them and just said hello. They started laughing and were embarrassed. Turned out, they were trying to get pictures of my hair. I have a head full of gray hair (I'm DL ancient--45) and they wanted to show my picture to their friend who they are trying to get to stop coloring his hair.

I guess I was flattered, but maybe they should have asked first? I let them take a few pictures that weren't so "spy cam" but it was still kind of weird.

[quote]He just glared at me for a moment, mildly curious but didn't say anything.

Looking at you would suggest curiosity; glaring means that he's pissed off.

R96 You want a photo of his ass so you tried to take it. You wanted his ass so you would try to take that too. You're a creepy wannabe rapist who gives gays a bad name. Fuck you and die in a grease fire, cunt.

I want a menu from The Cheesecake Factory so I take it. I wanted a slice of cheesecake so I take that too. I'm a whiny fat cunt who gives fraus a bad name. Fuck me with grease and start a fire in my cunt.

When I see people on the subway taking up too many seats or putting their bags on empty seats (when the car is full), I take a picture and make sure they see me taking it. They probably think I'm putting it on a website, but I just text it to my friends.

[quote]Why couldn't that cunt mind her own business?

Says the creep taking creeper shots on the subway.

Do you know how nuts you are, OP?

The difference between professional photographers and some creep taking a pic without someone's knowledge is that you'd most likely be able to contact the photographer and ask for your face or body to be blurred out or removed from the picture. But with an anonymous creep taking a pic and then posting it online (again anomalously) means that getting it removed would most likely be impossible, plus there's the whole point of being sexualised, it's like construction guys wolf whistling at a passing lady it's inappropriate and if you don't think it is it shows a lack of good moral or ethical judgement.

If you hadn't done anything wrong you wouldn't have run because there would be nothing to fight about.

Street photography is taking photos of street scenes. It is not snapping creeper shots of unknowing strangers on your cell phone. They two totally different things done by different people for different reasons. Don't conflate pervy creeper shots with street photography.

This has been going on for years - and there are 1000s of pics of guys in various places. There's another one of guys reading that was very popular (all among women, well.. mostly women). Basically, google "pics of guys in [wherever]" and you'll find a tumblr of it.

DILFs of disneyland.

How many DLers will leave comments imploring the Instagrammers of the above accounts that they're creepy pervs who should be ashamed? How many of you will report their accounts or implore them to delete those photos?

That should have read,

How many DLers will leave comments telling* the Instagrammers of the above accounts that they're creepy pervs who should be ashamed

You're not sleezy because you took a picture of his ass.

You're sleezy because you didn't do it discreetly enough to not be caught.

Do better next time.

Taking pictures of strangers is creepy and desperate and will therefore be lauded and labelled as "adventurous" by all of the lecherous stalker types present.

I snuck a picture of this dude's buldge at costco the other day...it was ridiculous - like he was hiding a small child in his shorts.

Maybe he was.

R161, I agree; but I know a guy who snaps shots of extremely hot guys and I admit I look at the on his page.

I think teen boys; hell, 21, and under should be off limits; no kids, but hotties who work out their bodies and want to be admired?

I'm on the fence.

Isn't that kind of...uncomfortable?

"Taking pictures of strangers is creepy...."

Well, there goes most of 20th- century photography.

This a futile discussion. Hot people, be they male or female, love to be admired. If they say otherwise, then they are flat out lying. Genetics are vital, but these people also put a lot of effort into looking the way that they do. I don't care who you are - your window is relatively short when it comes to the ability to turn heads in public on a regular basis. We all enjoy the attention - if it is harmless and legal then go for it. Who cares? Getting caught snapping a pic is embarrassing for the "photographer" but flattering for the subject. Ten years from now, he will pay good money to get that sort of attention. Time marches on..

Fun read, this. Seeing the approval posts for a sleezy act, it's easy to see how wounded DL habitués are,

I prefer sleazy acts, snowflake.

When did everyone get so fucking prudish about sexuality? The guy's wearing PANTS, for Chrissake. One could be taking photos of the subway car and I guess that will have to be the in-house excuse with all the Victorian idiots out there. Pearl clutching to the extreme.

R167, I agree to a certain point. But, how many of these hot people have just specific body parts photographed?

This whole thread gives a lot away. Clearly its divided between the average looking people gagging for attention saying they'd kill to have a stranger notice them and good looking people saying the creepy guys on trains better not make eye contact let alone take picture of their perfect bodies. It's very funny.

It creeps me out because I know it was spank material for the OP. If he wanted to take a candid of people riding the subway or thought there was some story to tell about the guy in the picture hanging for the strap after a long day, then it could be considered some art or worthwhile but it was of his ass, objectifying the guy and for sexual gratification. Creepy.

Well, I'm gorgeous and I take clandestine pictures of hot guys all the time!

It must be some ass to be worth the trouble of opening the camera app and worse, trying to contort the way you hold the phone to get the photo covertly. Yes, I have done it before but usually when walking behind some hunky guys on the streets (which is even more challenging since we're both moving) but rarely on public transport, which is usually too crowded for this kind of thing.

R1 nailed it. So why the other comments?

There is only one type of person who takes pics of hot people they don't know in public places without asking.

And that would be a person who could never land an actual hot person in real life.

R177 And that would be most people... besides appreciating someone's good looks doesn't mean you actually want to get involved with them. Good looking people are high maintenance.

Just learn how to snap a butt pic yet make it look like you are checking email, text, etc. Pretend to be surfing the internet. None of this is hard. Guys with hot asses and bodies love the attention that they receive from us all. In fact, they thrive on it. Just attempt to not make a fool out of yourself in the process. I can hardly even imagine that this stud with the sexy booty gave a flying shit. Photograph him naked in the locker room or sitting on the toilet taking a deuce and then we have another conversation. Click a pic of his beautiful, clothed behind and I bet that he will jack off to the thought of being an object of lust and most likely will be flattered beyond belief. I find it hard to care about something so benign and trivial - which is exactly what this convo is at this point. No harm was done and a sexy man felt sexier after the fact.

If the woman had not called attention to OP, he would have snapped his photo and everyone would be happy. She was the one who caused any discomfort to the guy who was being photographed by making him aware of it. She also embarrassed OP, who really wasn't hurting anyone. Next time, OP might want to try to be a little more discreet, though.

I don't care who snaps my picture if I don't know it nor do I care much what they do with it. I would be terribly embarrassed, though, if they asked me if they could take my picture - or if some asshole pointed it out to me.

[quote]It creeps me out because I know it was spank material for the OP. If he wanted to take a candid of people riding the subway or thought there was some story to tell about the guy in the picture hanging for the strap after a long day, then it could be considered some art or worthwhile but it was of his ass, objectifying the guy and for sexual gratification. Creepy.

I'm having a hard time understanding how it's "creepy" that someone would lust after a stranger and take a picture to look at later, perhaps as a masturbatory aid. Sexual attraction is creepy? Admiring a stranger's ass is creepy? Thinking about that ass later while masturbating is creepy? What ELSE do you find "creepy"?

You might want to relax. OP admired someone's body part and wanted to remember it later. It's not like he was taking a picture of the guy on the toilet, or stole the guy's underwear...or cut off one of his nipples so he could have it for himself. I mean, really: "creepy"?

R181 I really thought this was sarcasm until I had to realise you were serious... yikes

Why is admiring someone's body part creepy? What's the difference between making a mental memory of it and taking a picture of just the ass (not the face) and not uploading it to the Internet? A huge part of how sexual attraction works is using your eyes to look at a person's body.

Literally not one person has explained WHY this instance of picture taking is creepy. You people keep saying it's creepy but not one of you has articulated why exactly it is so.

What about SKETCHING? Has anyone ever been in public and noticed that an artist has their big notebook open and they're sketching you? It happens. Are you "creeped out" by that?

R183 - exactly. Beautiful people like to be admired. It is not as if OP pinched his ass, stink fingered him or tried to give him a credit card swipe. Obviously, all of the above would be crossing a line. I just do not see the HORROR over anything that he did. It sounds flattering more than anything else. 7 or so years ago - I would get attention often at clubs and bars. Lots from hot guys and almost equally from straight women. It made me feel good, not the opposite. It still happens but less these days. Who cares, it was complimentary. No one grabbed at me (well, a few times I guess and that is a different scenario) - but I felt attractive and certainly enjoyed the attention. How stupid to think that someone would feel otherwise. My face, hair, body, tan and clothing was all part of wanting to be seen by strangers to look sexy. I would have been disappointed if no gave a shit, if no one cared, if no one gave me the time of day. Get over yourselves (those who are SO OFFENDED about this conversation). It really is usually all about blustering and wanting one thing but claiming to want another.

R184 Okay most of this "story false". The fact you think someone being attractive gives you an open ticket to be a perv says a lot.

Yikes

" Story" is false*

Actually r183 lots of people explained why they think it's not ok.

"ticket to be a perv"

What is perverted about this situation? You don't know the meaning of the word.

Videotaping someone taking a dump without their knowledge or consent: perverted

Rifling through your roommate's dirty laundry to sniff his underwear: perverted

Grabbing someone you've just met by the pussy without asking first: perverted

R188, and what is the number one reason for why it's "creepy"?

R189 R190 If theres nothing wrong with this situation why sneak and do it? Why not ask "sir you have a nice ass can I take a pic"? Oh wait you know why. Sneaking implies you know you're doing something wrong. Case closed you tried it

HOT!

[quote]How fragile and ridiculous you idiots are. I hope you all get STARED AT relentlessly until you DIE of your injuries sustained in the EYE-RAPE.

Eye-rape is nowhere near as disgraceful as FART-RAPE

R185, I truly feel bad for you. I am not sure what else to say. Clearly you have never experienced any sort of nightlife scene, youthful fun or worst of all - feeling attractive in your own skin. This is a shame because we all deserve to be lusted after at some stage of life and also to be thought of as sexually attractive by some other human being. Being looked at and even objectified goes with the territory - it always has. It always will..

I took this sneaky pic of the dudes down at the pond.

R194 Are you mentally healthy?

R191, asking him would have been awkward for the asker and awkward for the object of desire.

Don't we all like to try to avoid awkward situations whenever possible?

It's pretty simple. It's easy to take a picture of someone with their knowing. And if it's just for yourself, and the person will never find out (thus never be affected by it in any way whatsoever), there is NO HARM in it.

Is this really so hard to grasp?

[quote]It's easy to take a picture of someone with their knowing.

*without their knowing

Carved this guy the other day. Some people in this thread may call me perverted, but why else would he be standing nude in a public space like that?

R197 But WHY would it be awk if theres nothing wrong with it? If the desire is "natrual" why hide it?

OP, were you close enough to lick his ass?

R200 why is it even necessary to ask? It's not like he was going to publish the picture and needed permission. It's also not illegal to take someone's picture without their approval. If it's so wrong, why is it legal?

You seem to be repeatedly missing the point of the discussion. No one is arguing whether it's legal, people are discussing whether it's flattering to have an unsolicited picture taken or inclined to make someone uncomfortable. It's also not illegal for the crazy Frau to yell at OP either but should she have? Lots of other things are not illegal btw, smoking, drinking until you pass out and wearing fur. But does that make it ok? That's what people are discussing.

R196, I am well aware of your medical diagnosis of my mental health. You have every right to your assessment and I also realize that you hold the moral majority opinion. My viewpoint remains the same however. Many realities in life are macabre; I do not make the rules. Sexuality is an enigma and always has been. We all crave lust and adoration and that is that - plain and simple. Should we wander around attempting to molest or defile any human that we find attractive? Of course not. That said, an innocent clothed butt pic on a subway isn't going to hurt a flea.

[quote]No one is arguing whether it's legal, people are discussing whether it's flattering to have an unsolicited picture taken or inclined to make someone uncomfortable.

In 99% of instances where someone snaps a cell phone picture of a stranger in public, the person being photographed is unaware of it and never finds out. So why does it even matter?

Why does the mere idea of having your picture taken by a stranger without your permission bother you? What harm, exactly, comes from it?

R197 Farting and picking a booger is as "natural" as can be. But do you not agree that it is more polite to exercise some discretion when performing such a "natural" act?

I am trying to discern whether all of these prudish boors at male or female. I am embarrassed to say that I fear most of them are women. I hope I am wrong.

R177 You are 100% correct, and the subjects of these photos, both aware and unaware of the photo-taking) understand that.

I don't claim to be a past "hotness martyr," but it made me feel a little happy to know that when John Doe returned to Flyoverstan following his Big Easy holiday he would have that souvenir to flash when being dogged by bullies or to frame and place by his bed for impressing local honeys. Remember, this was EONS before the wired Facebook era.

OP, I ride the NYC subway all the time, and if it were my ass you were attempting to snap a pic of, I would've been flattered.

This thread is so fucking sad.

R1 provided the best answer. No need to read on.

If it's just the ass, I don't see anything wrong with it. And even if you post in the internet , that should fine. But if it includes his face, then that's another story.

This never happened. Also , OP, you're a creep.

Truth of the matter is that all the clowns thinking its ok to take pics of people without their permission (and use them as beat off material later on) are so fat and ugly no one would want a pic of them. Who the hell wants pics of some smelly assed 'tard who couldn't get laid if their life depended on it.

R213 Does your computer come with a magic camera that photographs other DL posters without their knowledge or consent? Is that how you know how they look?

There's such a diversity of very strong opinions on this thread. Just some food for thought... If the photographer had been a teenage girl, would that have made a difference in people's opinions? Or what if the photographer had been a hot woman in her early 20s? And what if the photographer had been an elderly man trying to take a photo of a young women's butt?

"Is that how you know how they look?"

Like it or not, attractive people get laid, They don't have to go around clandestinely taking photos of other people's body parts for masturbation material. Only the truly desperate have to resort to OP's tactics.

My apologies to you if that doesn't fit in with your altered universe.

Legally you don't actually have permission to take or use some one's image without their consent.

Op don't be a hypocritical little bitch. If you think you have the right to take creep shots of people in public, then she certainly has the right to call your ass out IN PUBLIC. fair is fair.

How is she an "SJW" too, when you are the one crying about unfairness and how your safe space was violated?

R217 and R218 are lying.

No, I'm not, you can get sued for taking or using some one's image without their consent, trust me I took a picture of Rihanna and posted it to Instagram and Instagram took it down of behalf of Rihanna's lawyers.

[quote]Legally you don't actually have permission to take or use some one's image without their consent.

Look, an alternative fact in the wild!

You are very, very, very wrong. If a person is in public, anybody has a right to take their picture. The only legal problems come if you are using that picture for a commercial enterprise, then you run into problems.

You let Rihanna's lawyers bully you into doing what they want, they didn't have an actual legal leg to stand on.

OK show me the law that says I have a right to take some one's picture WITHOUT their consent and I'll believe you.

Is your google broken? Here is the legal zoom article on it.

[quote]Ehe Video Voyeurism Prevention Act prohibits the photographing or videotaping of a naked person without his or her permission in a gym, tanning salon, dressing room or anywhere else where one expects a "reasonable expectation of privacy." Violators can expect fines of up to $100,000 and/or up to a year in prison. This doesn't necessarily make it illegal for someone to snap your photo without your permission though. For instance, if you're just walking down the street and someone takes a picture, they're well within their rights no matter how violated you might feel. But if someone takes a picture of you without your permission while you're getting ready to shower at the gym, it's against the law. This law isn't limited to camera phones but also includes camcorders, cameras, and digital cameras.

Such it bitch I knew I was right, you can take a pic but you just can't do anything with it lol.

R220, did they threaten to hit you with her umbrella, ella, ella...

Legal or not is irrelevant. If op wants to use his right to take creep shots, cool. How can he be upset someone else used their right to call him out publically? He thinks he should be allowed and entitled to do something he felt the need to hide, but doesn't think he should be publically shamed for said behavior.

If someone strips down and runs across Times Square, do they have the right to get upset and cry about it in shame if people post it to YouTube? No, no they don't. And neither does op. So go hang your head in shame OP. This is why everyone swipes past you on tindr.

or Grindr.

Stay on topic, R226. You didn't say anything that hasn't been said 50 times already in this thread.

We're now talking about the legality of taking someone's photo in a public place, and we're going to beat R222's brains out.

You can take a picture in a public setting, however, you can't really do anything with the image unless the persons in the pic have their identities protected.

Not true r229. The link at r224 explains it well. There are three specific legal cases in which you can challenge someone for posting your picture without your consent. Outside of those three types of situations they are withing their right to do so.

Everyone is beating up on the OP for being "creepy", that's all. Did the OP ever say he was planning to share the picture publicly?

I think it's kinda implied that if he did get the shot he would share it.

So some random guy sexualising your ass without your permission is not offensive and an invasion of your privacy.

And one could argue that it also that photographs like this defame you and injures your image or reputation.

Why would it be an "invasion of privacy" when the guy is fully clothed and IN A PUBLIC PLACE where all photography is legal, R233?

R232, that would be legal as wel. Why do you think those "Hot Guys On The Metro", "Hot Guys Reading" social media accounts persist? They're fully legal and they're no different from what OP did. In fact, they go one step further than he did, because they actually published the shots they got.

It's legal.

This is from a website about street photography, but there is no legal difference between "street photography" and "taking a picture of a hot guy's ass on the subway"

[quote]You are allowed to display and even sell the images that you've photographed.

[quote]This is another point people tend to get hung up on. If you had the right to photograph a subject or scene, generally speaking, you also have the authority to display the photograph as an illustration of art or news – and that includes showing those images on your blog, in print, in news media, and in your photography portfolio (print or online). Indeed, you can even sell prints or digital copies of your street photography.

And that's from a "mom" blog!! ^^^^

R234, how so? Was the tall Asian guy photographed in a "compromising" situation? Riding the subway in sweat pants? How exactly would you make that case that it's defaming or injuring to his image or reputation?

[quote] I would have smacked the phone out of your hand. It is an invasion of privacy.

No it's not at all. Not in a public space. The courts have ruled quite consistently on this.

It's creepy, but it's perfectly legal.

[quote]How exactly would you make that case that it's defaming or injuring to his image or reputation?

You can't. People can call this "creepy" all they want, but don't pretend like the law agrees with you. The is law is clear that there is nothing wrong with doing it.

If the photographer had been uploaded to a pornographic in nature website if could one be seen as a false statement as how do people who see this photo don't know he wasn't participating in the photograph and with the photographer, in addition if the photo causes harm both emotional and financial such as a future employer googling your image only to find it on a pornographic blog or site future employment could be harmed.

A person is guilty of video voyeurism when, with the intent of arousing, appealing to or gratifying the lust or passions or sexual desires of such person or another person, or for his own or another person's lascivious entertainment or satisfaction of prurient interest, or for the purpose of sexually degrading or abusing any other person

- IDAHO IDAHO CODE- Crime of video voyeurism

R242, you're a retard. That's all that needs to be said in response to your post.

But, remember that this guy's face wasn't going to be in the picture. Nor was his name. The idea that it would be used on a pornographic site is utterly inane.

Any public place where a person, by taking reasonable steps to conceal intimate areas, should be free from the viewing, recording, storing or transmitting of images obtained by imaging devices designed to overcome the barriers created by a person's covering of intimate areas.

R245, what "intimate area" was uncovered? This wasn't an "upskirt" photo.

A buttocks isn't considered an intimate area?

Yikes, it appears that even "upskirt" photos are legal, at least in Georgia anyway.

Engages in visual surveillance in a public place by means of mechanical or electronic equipment with the intent to observe or photograph, or record, amplify or broadcast an image of any portion of the body of another person present in that place when that portion of the body is in fact concealed from public view under clothing and a reasonable person would expect it to be safe from surveillance.

So you expect your ass to have a reasonable amount of privacy, sure ok.

OP is being ganged up on by a bunch of SJW losers. Fuck you all and all your "creep" and "pervert" labels--anybody can take a picture of anybody in public. No law against it and if you don't like it nobody cares but some other SJW.

Keep going, OP! And post those hot asses!

YEAH, BABY!!!

[quote]A buttocks isn't considered an intimate area?

Not when they're CLOTHED, you dumb fuck.

What the hell is an SJW? and yes there are lots of laws against but each state has different laws but they're there

A buttocks isn't considered an intimate area? Not when they're CLOTHED, you dumb fuck.

It says - reasonable steps to conceal intimate areas (i.e clothes), should be free from the viewing recording, storing or transmitting of images obtained

r253, "it says"? What's "it"? NO LAW against taking a picture of someone. Sorry, SJW.

OP--please continue.

Maine Legislature §511. Violation of privacy

2016 Idaho Statutes Title 18 - CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS Chapter 66 - SEX CRIMES Section 18-6609 - CRIME OF VIDEO VOYEURISM.

Maine and Ohio. Who gives a fuck? OP was on the subway in NYC.

Ha, that's the come back, there's no laws oh wait there is a law but who gives a fuck, typical.

r258--where's the law in NYC?

Am I missing something? I haven't seen people proving it is illegal in any state, because I am pretty positive it is not. The only statute I've seen posted is the video voyeurism statue. Usually video voyeurism involves the person had an expectation of privacy, that is what makes it VOYEURISM.

r260, you're exactly right. No law anywhere that says you can't use your cell phone to take a picture of someone in public.

Obviously, people aren't reading the above posts because there blatantly are laws against taking pictures of certain body parts, I've just googled it for Maine because I live just outside of Bangor and can't believe it but you can't take a picture of a persons body, it's fucking CRAZY!!!!!

r262, take your pills and lie down.

OP--keep doin' what you do. Fuck these Penelope Prisspots.

No law against using your cell phone camera on a subway.

If it weren't for OP, we wouldn't have three-quarters of the sites on Tumblr, which I'm sure half the bitch SJWs on this thread secretly go to and enjoy because of the fine work like that done by OP.

Yeah until you get smacked in the mouth or cut.

r265--and THAT would be the actual crime: assault. And that's the real criminal who'd get arrested.

Sure but I wonder who the jury would side with some old perv or some one who feels they've been sexually assaulted.

You two need something else to do

r267--"old perv." Not very politically correct language for a SJW. LOL

There is no law in ANY state that prohibits someone from taking a picture of a person (including any specific part of their body) if it's in a PUBLIC place, which excludes locker rooms or bathrooms.

And we are still talking about a CLOTHED body part.

If you think otherwise, you're not understanding the law.

Really enjoying this thread. I had no idea what a SJW was, though, and had to Google it. Social Justice Warrior is so much less exciting than I had envisioned.

[quote]If the photographer had been a teenage girl, would that have made a difference in people's opinions?

Well, duh.

But it WASN'T, Blanche! It WASN'T a teenage girl!

If you people think this was wrong, you need to stay home and not go out in public. The OP has a legal right to do this, despite all you pathological reasons that he was wrong.

R272, so the real issue is not about privacy then, even though so many people on this thread want to frame the discussion that way. The real issue is some "creepiness" factor that nobody has really defined yet.

r274, it's what you say, yes. How many hypocrites are on this thread clucking about some guy taking a picture of some other guy's clothed ass in public like it's akin to child molestation and have been to Tumblr in the last week?

OP it is wrong. You don't know who he is. Perhaps it's just a pic you took for your own personal....pleasure lol but most people think it's cute to post those pics on social media. R7 it's creepy because taking a picture of someone or their body parts without their permission is rude, it shows as lack of thoughtfulness. Its so sad that so many of you don't get it and seemed to be ruled by your penis. Just because someone leaves their house doesn't mean anyone else has the RIGHTS to their person let alone to be photographed by them. How many of you have been fucked with? Harassed? Is it ok because you left your house? Please understand I'm coming from a place of having to hide and not having any pics of me on social media (2 schizophrenic relatives, one just itching to get me back) so I wouldn't be keen on having my picture taken.

r276, would it make a difference if OP did know the guy and took the picture?

You're the kind of DL hand-wringer the rest of DL feeds off of, and with some good reason. Your morality--and all the morality of the tsk-tskers here--is yours. There's no law that backs any of you up.

R21 see it's people like you who don't understand. Just because someone looks good....doesn't mean that THAT person feels the same about themselves. You don't know what that person thinks....let alone if their mentally STABLE. Its people like you R21 who just don't get "it". Either because you're devoid of common sense....or you just don't respect other people, their space, and mentality. R21 I hope you can see the point because whatever your mind set....you will put yourself in some serious jeopardy.

[quote]I would have smacked the phone out of your hand...

That would be assault, dear. And you could actually face charges for that.

R26.. OP how interesting you keep calling this girl fat/jealous....if she was black then yes a lot of black people (here in NYC at least) do NOT like that not do they find it cute. OP I think you are either a troll, mentally unbalanced or are a gay man who just really hates women because like I said you most certainly are quick to call her fat/jealous/etc. Interesting OP....very telling about your mental state.

r280=Sigmund Freud.

R280, are you a black female?

r280, what does being black have to do with it? Who cares?

Easy going frau, I love ya. My hunch is that a lot of the prudes are uptight guys. I'm still waiting for OP to post SOMETHING.

I think in solidarity with OP, if anyone has just such a pic, they should post it here, proudly.

Farting in someones face isn't illegal how about we try doing that to strangers! Let me know the results!

I haven't abandoned this thread, sorry I haven't posted more replies. Muriel had me in timeout for two days, presumably for creating this thread.

[quote] People are using the law to argue what is or isn't permissible, but perhaps what should be used is 1) basic manners and 2) communication. If you'd like to take a picture of someone, ask them. If they're okay with it, you get a better picture than you would have by being sneaky. If they're not, you would be rude in persisting and then you deserve to be called out for it

Thank you, Miss Manners. We'll write our requests to photograph his ass in black or blue-black ink on 100% cotton paper, just to be sure.

R286, the difference between farting in someone's face and secretly photographing their clothed ass, is that they'll probably know right away that you've farted in their face, whereas they are unlikely to ever know one of their body parts was photographed.

[quote] A buttocks isn't considered an intimate area?

Not in the least!

I cant believe this thread is so busy

Let's be for real, these hot guys have dick pics and everything else online and probably couldn't care less about someone getting a freebie.

NEXT

OP, WHERE'S AN ASS PIC!?

I wanna see some morally wrong, privacy invading, creepy perv pics of poor innocent oblivious straight men.

Unless there's a LAW against it.

I feel like DL has been invaded by a herd of sex negative Mommy prudes.

It is absolutely mind boggling to me that anyone is bothered by a camera snap of a fully dressed adult in a public venue.

It's interesting, isn't it, R294?

I wish all those people could be rounded up and... put away, where they can't cause any more trouble for society.

r181, I admire plenty of asses I don't know. What you do is take a glance, just enough to get the image in your head and then you look away. Maybe you casually look back in that direction to recapture that image, and then you take it home with you in your mind. They you can recall it out of your spank bank.

Of course I have wanted to snap a picture of someone I didn't know but I don't, because it's what creeps do.

r183, because if OP, wants to just have that picture for himself for his pathetic life to have some ass pic of someone he doesn't know it's creepy. It's like loner with shrine of stalking victims.

Or

He is full of shit and he is going to use it while online dating, claiming the picture is him, or he is going to post it online for the world to see, doing something with someone's image that is not with their consent is jerky.

or

Just so he and he alone can see it is pathetic and sad.

Hot ass: hey what are you doing? OP: Taking a picture of your ass so I can masterbate to it later. Hot ass: That is pretty cool - said no one ever.

R297, you're pretending that this situation is a lot more serious, sad, and sinister than it actually is.

Haven't you ever been with your buddies and seen a chick with a great set of tits on her? You rib your friend and say "Hey, check THOSE out." And then the two of you go "Oh, fuck. Shit!"

Or maybe that happens except you're alone, and you want your friend to see it anyway. So you snap a picture of the well endowed woman and text it to your buddy. This happens all the time.

Same thing here with the OP and the Asian ass.

Human sexuality involves looking and leering sometimes. The key is to do it discreetly. If it's in public and no laws are broken, and it's not shared online and the subject never finds out, what is the harm in it? "It's creepy" doesn't mean anyone was harmed. No threats were made, no rape was attempted, no one was even harassed because they weren't aware that anyone was even looking. Nothing negative was said or thought.

This is just part of life. Existing with other people. Having a sex drive. Taking advantage of technological advances, but keeping it to yourself. Lighten up, for the love of god.

Yay, Ms. McFrauerson!

You're a creep OP and escaped cause you know you're full of shit and was scared to have to ass kicked.

In one word: pathetic.

R300 You are just a hair's breadth away from screaming at clouds.

Someone is pathetic, and it's not the OP.

OP is such a loser.

I've been "featured" a couple of times on DILFErotica. Not bothered by it in the least... hey, at least someone thinks I'm hot enough. Browsing through that tumblr is like walking down the street on my lunch break, if you had daddy-only filters on.

R302 Okay. Now I get it. I was bewildered by what I thought was a herd of prudish assholes who had somehow stumbled onto this little site called DataLounge. But my faith in my usual ability to gauge our communal groupthink here has been restored. I am not one to "reverse trolldar" someone ass a means of learning if they are a Trumper or if they espouse the same stank attitude in thread after thread. I have used the function twice until today. I clicked block on you just to see if you come off as this unhinged in all your posts. Imagine my surprise when I saw that THIRTY of the Tumblr SJW Mommy prude comments in this thread are from YOU! And you have no other active threads. Hmmm? It was surely worth the effort though, because now I know that the usual tenor of the real DL posters has not devolved into whiny finger pointing ninnies. It's just YOU.

Truly you are a sad case.

r296, r297 and r300--judgmental, Penelope Prisspot cunts.

You guys throwing shade at OP are the same ones clicking through tumblrs of hot guy ass and dick pics. You know its true

My point exactly, r306. Queeny troll hypocrites.

r304, you couldn't be more right. r302, a true SJW, is also a true sad case. I didn't realize until recently just how many sad, loser cases there are on DL.

Is this him, OP?

Not him, my guy's ass was even better. Very manly and meaty, like two large honeydew melons.

Really, OP? That Asian butt in R308 is a 10.0 in my books, and I'd even give a couple bonus points for those awesome legs.

How can I be a trump supporter I'm British so suck on that.

Nah, not enough meat in that pic.

Also,

NEW STRAIN OF GONORRHEA IS ANTIBIOTICS RESISTANT

The ass in R308 is great, there's no way I'd throw that out of my bed. The guy on the subway had a bigger ass, is all.

All of you who are concerned about having your ass photographed without your knowledge should keep at least one hand over it at all times. That should thwart the creeps.

I wonder if OP is the one with this Tumblr blog

This NEVER happened