Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Sam Claflin Opens Up About Experiencing Body Shaming on Set: ‘I Felt Like a Piece of Meat’

Sam Claflin is getting candid on his first-hand experiences with body shaming.

The 30-year-old British actor has played a variety of heartthrob roles on-screen -- Finnick in The Hunger Games franchise, William in Snow White and the Huntsman, and Will in Me Before You -- and says he has been openly judged for his weight while working. Claflin says body shaming definitely occurs for male actors as well as female actresses, though it's rarely discussed.

"I read in an interview recently and I think it's absolutely true: men have it just as bad," he tells The Sydney Morning Herald. "Well, not just as bad but they get it bad and it's never talked about."

"I remember doing one job when they literally made me pull my shirt up and were grabbing my fat and going, 'You need to lose a bit of weight.' This other time they were slapping me. I felt like a piece of meat."

Claflin admits he has lingering issues because of the experiences.

"I'm not saying it's anywhere near as bad as what women go through but I, as an actor approaching each job, am insecure -- especially when I have to take my top off in it -- and so nervous," he shares. "I get really worked up to the point where I spend hours and hours in the gym and not eating for weeks to achieve what I think they're going for."

The actor points out that movie standards have changed over time.

"In the '50s and '60s, it was never an issue," he says. "James Bond never had a six pack. He had a hairy chest. Marlon Brando​ in A Streetcar Named Desire had an incredible body but he was by no means ripped to within an inch of his life. There's a filter on society that this is normal but actually it's anything but normal."

Claflin isn't the only male star to speak up about body shaming. In March, Chris Pratt addressed those criticizing him for apparently losing too much weight with a humorous Instagram post.

"Well, just because I am a male doesn't mean I'm impervious to your whispers," he wrote. "Body shaming hurts."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 115April 13, 2018 8:44 PM

So not cool. Not cool!

by Anonymousreply 1June 6, 2017 5:53 AM

Screw the body-shaming; can we skip straight to the beard-shaming? Because that is some Johnny-Depp-channeling-Orlando-Bloom levels of pathetic beard growth. It's the first beard I've seen with its own combover. I've seen 12 year olds with more facial hair.

by Anonymousreply 2June 6, 2017 5:55 AM

[quote] The actor points out that movie standards have changed over time.

[quote] "In the '50s and '60s, it was never an issue," he says. "James Bond never had a six pack. He had a hairy chest. Marlon Brando​ in A Streetcar Named Desire had an incredible body but he was by no means ripped to within an inch of his life. There's a filter on society that this is normal but actually it's anything but normal."

I absolutely love that he pointed this out, and he's 100% correct.

Today's standards are ridiculous and completely artificial. Actors need to reject this notion that their bodies have to be perfect.

Fuck that.

by Anonymousreply 3June 6, 2017 5:56 AM

Took my comment

by Anonymousreply 4June 6, 2017 6:04 AM

and sometimes it doesn't even fit the character. Jake G. had a shirtless semi-nude scene in Nocturanal Animals and he was cut like a male model while the character was a writer.

by Anonymousreply 5June 6, 2017 6:23 AM

He should worry less about his body and work more on that face.

by Anonymousreply 6June 6, 2017 6:28 AM

Poor baby. Has it so rough. Maybe he'd like to trade places with a Yemeni or Afghani.

by Anonymousreply 7June 6, 2017 7:14 AM

Honey, if you're being paid an unholy fortune to show up looking hot, you show up looking hot or you lose your fucking job!

He got off easy, and he's whining about it like a little girl.

by Anonymousreply 8June 6, 2017 7:29 AM

He's a whiner.

by Anonymousreply 9June 6, 2017 7:34 AM

A highly marbled piece of meat.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10June 6, 2017 7:36 AM

I've been there. It sucks.

I look decent, but not heart throb level physique.

Like bringing forth a compelling character isn't enough to contend with, I have to worry about that crap?!

Fuck that. I told my agent no more shirtless stuff. It's just not worth the angst.

Of course, they still ask every time, "Are you sure?"

by Anonymousreply 11June 6, 2017 8:47 AM

Sam Claflin shouldn't be complaining about anything, he's way too fug to get away with being flabby.

by Anonymousreply 12June 6, 2017 8:52 AM

He's right of course.

Just look at fatties DLers drooling over Instagram famewhores. Pathetic.

No wonder there's no more good actors at HW.

by Anonymousreply 13June 6, 2017 8:53 AM

Oh man, what a sob story! I'll be weeping over it when I start my next unpaid professional internship! Boo fucking hoo!

by Anonymousreply 14June 6, 2017 9:26 AM

R14 Get a six-pack and be an actor, loser.

by Anonymousreply 15June 6, 2017 9:28 AM

Well come on... This is him.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16June 6, 2017 9:33 AM

I think he looks good with a little meat on him, per photo. Thinner, his face is gaunt.

by Anonymousreply 17June 6, 2017 9:38 AM

The thing with Sam Clafin is that he has a beautiful face but an average male body. He didn't get both like some other actors/models do. So in order to get his body ready necessary for whatever roles he's going for, he needs to work extra, extra hard at the gym and starve to get even average results.

He's worth $50 million dollars so he hasn't done too badly for himself. I guess he can always cry into his many swimming pools...

by Anonymousreply 18June 6, 2017 9:49 AM

I'm always wondering, are these numbers reliable? Can you really know how much worth an actor just looking at some random Internet site?

by Anonymousreply 19June 6, 2017 10:08 AM

Finnick was a sex symbol role. Having a nice body was a requirement.

And everyone knows this happens with guys now along with girls. Get over it. It is the entertainment industry and people like seeing good looking people.

by Anonymousreply 20June 6, 2017 10:48 AM

One can be good looking without looking like a steroid freak.

by Anonymousreply 21June 6, 2017 10:51 AM

R15, you do it if you fucking care about it so much, asshole.

by Anonymousreply 22June 6, 2017 10:53 AM

Bodies come and go. The face is what matters. He's cute in OP's photo and the same cute at R16.

by Anonymousreply 23June 6, 2017 11:01 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 24June 6, 2017 11:02 AM

I'm so glad he finally opened up about this problem. I had no idea of the suffering he is going through

by Anonymousreply 25June 6, 2017 11:06 AM

R24 What seems like a normal/good body in real life, is seen as fat/flabby in HW.

This crazy standard for movie/tv becomes the everyday standards for men.

It's not just about a guy whining about his overpaid job, it's about how you're not seen as attractive if you don't spend 5 hours each day at gym and eat something else than kale. It's about unhealthy standards if you're not a pro athlete.

by Anonymousreply 26June 6, 2017 11:10 AM

I expect that from HW but not a web board full of shut-ins and Octogenarians who wished they looked that good.

by Anonymousreply 27June 6, 2017 11:22 AM

I have seen all The Hunger Games movies. How come I don't remember him?

by Anonymousreply 28June 6, 2017 11:40 AM

He must be killed early. Fat slow cow makes easy target?

by Anonymousreply 29June 6, 2017 11:41 AM

R28 Cause he's not a good actor, maybe?

He's part of all these young actors hired for their looks. They all look the same and are all forgettable.

by Anonymousreply 30June 6, 2017 11:49 AM

It's really hard for me to sympathize with young pretty rich people. Even if he may have a point that body image is an issue in today's media, it doesn't change the fact that he still got paid millions to do those shirtless roles; it comes off a little ungrateful.

by Anonymousreply 31June 6, 2017 12:00 PM

FAT!

by Anonymousreply 32June 6, 2017 12:04 PM

[quote]Even if he may have a point that body image is an issue in today's media, it doesn't change the fact that he still got paid millions to do those shirtless roles; it comes off a little ungrateful.

Right on the money R31.

On one hand it must suck to have someone come up to you and grab your love handles and tell you that you're too fat.

On the other hand, you're being paid a lot of money to look a certain way.

It's hard to feel bad for you when part of your job is to actually work out.

by Anonymousreply 33June 6, 2017 12:18 PM

He was born with a perfect face. God forbid he should have to WORK for a good body. Imagine if he was born ugly, would he be on his 90th plastic surgery by now?

by Anonymousreply 34June 6, 2017 12:20 PM

His stomach and hip area are really wide and womanly. I think his genetics are working against him. He doesn't have the Chris Hemsworth torso, but I do think he's very attractive.

by Anonymousreply 35June 6, 2017 12:20 PM

I think men are now going through what women have experienced for some time in pop culture: A body ideal that is very difficult to achieve but presented as the norm.

With the advent of Instagram, there is now a level of competition among the posters and an anxious sense of inadequacy in the viewers.

And yet, it really is an issue for the Darfur Orphan since it exposes the superficiality of our values and priorities, as well as the inherent narcissism in both social media and entertainment.

by Anonymousreply 36June 6, 2017 12:29 PM

Fat stupid pig.

by Anonymousreply 37June 6, 2017 12:43 PM

The reality is the audience isn't really going to feel sympathy. That is part of going into that business, you will be judged and hired based on how you look and whether it is what they want for the role.

by Anonymousreply 38June 6, 2017 12:48 PM

I wonder what role he's talking about. He definitely had to be thin and fit for Hunger Games and maybe SWATH, not sure what else. At least he acknowledges it's not as bad as what the women experience.

by Anonymousreply 39June 6, 2017 12:53 PM

God you people are cunts.

by Anonymousreply 40June 6, 2017 12:57 PM

[quote]I have seen all The Hunger Games movies. How come I don't remember him?

He was a terrible Finnick IMO. Though a lot of that is due to the writing of the character, they didn't really translate it that well from who Finnick was in the books.

by Anonymousreply 41June 6, 2017 12:58 PM

How fucking hard is liposuction?

by Anonymousreply 42June 6, 2017 1:01 PM

Obviously modeling is different but maybe things are slowly changing?

[quote]Fashion models in France will need to provide medical certificates proving they are healthy in order to work, after a new law was introduced banning those considered to be excessively thin.

[quote]A further measure, to come into force on 1 October, will require magazines, adverts and websites to mark images in which a model’s appearance has been manipulated with the words photographie retouchée (retouched photograph).

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43June 6, 2017 1:06 PM

That's a shitty looking beard. And he wasn't who I pictured for the part when I read Hunger Games.

by Anonymousreply 44June 6, 2017 1:09 PM

Casting Call Woe

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 45June 6, 2017 1:11 PM

I met Gregg Sulkin on Saturday at a convention in Philly. He was so sweet and that voice was sexy as hell. We were talking about his new show and he said that he starts filming in a few weeks. He said he needs to lose some more weight because he has a lot of shirtless scenes. Now he was wearing a tight white shirt. He looked great but I guess the pressure to look perfect is there.

by Anonymousreply 46June 6, 2017 1:17 PM

He is sexy. But he still needs to put on some muscle and loose some fat.

by Anonymousreply 47June 6, 2017 2:09 PM

He looks perfectly FINE in those pictures at R16 and R24.

It's fucking Hollywood that's telling people it's not okay to look like a NORMAL human being.

That's part of why our society is so fucked up with eating disorders, plastic surgery freaks, and body shaming.

The real joke is that most of the people criticizing these actors probably look like Donald Trump or worse. It's hilarious that you have someone whose looks are a 2/10, telling someone else that they're fat and unattractive.

Now THAT'S some irony!

by Anonymousreply 48June 6, 2017 2:21 PM

I'm 50, and while I try to keep my weight down a bit and always have, I've never worried about having a "perfect" body. When I was late teens-early 20s, no guy I knew was worried about it. You didn't want to be FAT ( I mean like obese) but that age group today is something else. My stepson and his friends are in their early 20s and NONE of them are fat, but I've heard them moaning about being fat. We even had to have a talk with the stepson because he was getting too skinny and still thought he was fat!

by Anonymousreply 49June 6, 2017 2:33 PM

Definitely gay. No straight man ever referred to his shirt as a "top."

by Anonymousreply 50June 6, 2017 2:34 PM

Drop the "T".

by Anonymousreply 51June 6, 2017 2:35 PM

Sam needs to take a positive attitude about it instead of hating the role of fit role model.

And he has much more to worry about with his receding hairline.

by Anonymousreply 52June 6, 2017 3:14 PM

[quote]And he has much more to worry about with his receding hairline.

At this rate he can get the Gandolfini and Giamatti roles, maybe even Jason Alexander or Wallace Shawn if he's comedically inclined.

by Anonymousreply 53June 6, 2017 3:24 PM

I'm kind of amazed that everyone takes it as gospel that it's so much worse for women. Who had to put in more effort for their Marvel movies, Chris Pratt or Zoe Saldana? Or Chris Evans compared to ScarJo?

Female action stars have to achieve a fit, "I do an hour of cardio and a little weight training" body. They don't have to look like Olympic athletes. The men do.

by Anonymousreply 54June 6, 2017 5:33 PM

First you cry, Sam!

What a whiny little pussy bitch.

by Anonymousreply 55June 6, 2017 5:37 PM

That isn't a standard case though r54. No one denies say the Marvel demands, their guys (yes ALL of them) have to get chemical help to look the way they are expected to.

In general though it doesn't quite work that way. All women in the entertainment industry need to be very thin, period. Women who aren't thin are only useful for niche parts. It isn't as strict with men overall.

by Anonymousreply 56June 6, 2017 5:42 PM

R54 - gross exaggeration but maybe there is a point in there somewhere.

by Anonymousreply 57June 6, 2017 6:01 PM

What bugs me is that Finnick's actor needed to be ripped but yet Katniss was allowed to be played by an actress who was not skinnier? Nor did she try to be as skinny as Katniss is stated to be in the books. If Finnick's actor had to put in effort to look a certain way then the same rules should have been applied to Katniss'. This whole "it wouldn't be good to make Jennifer lose a lot of weight because girls struggle with their body image" argument is stupid when other actors needed to lose weight to fit their characters. Actresses and actors have to lose and gain weight all the time for roles. It's part of the business.

by Anonymousreply 58June 6, 2017 6:05 PM

The whole point of the Finnick character (in the books anyway, the movie ruined him) is he uses his sexiness as a weapon. Him being good looking is a defining aspect of the character.

I never understood why people wanted Katniss to look superthin. She is supposed to be athletic and decently fit, she hunts her own food and isn't limited to some poor rations.

She was thin and starving at one point, but that was years before the story started.

by Anonymousreply 59June 6, 2017 6:10 PM

She was well fit.

by Anonymousreply 60June 6, 2017 6:12 PM

Go on a diet, lard bottom.

by Anonymousreply 61June 6, 2017 6:30 PM

[quote]All women in the entertainment industry need to be very thin, period. Women who aren't thin are only useful for niche parts. It isn't as strict with men overall.

This is why no studio will ever greenlight a comedy starring Melissa McCarthy or Amy Schumer.

by Anonymousreply 62June 6, 2017 7:04 PM

Who forces that poor guy to audition for movies that exploit his body? I don't get guys like him or Kit Harington. Instead of whining just take a stand and say No! to roles that they believe demean them. But then it's big money vs. fighting unrealistic beauty standards.

by Anonymousreply 63June 6, 2017 8:20 PM

"This is why no studio will ever greenlight a comedy starring Melissa McCarthy or Amy Schumer."

Pretty sure that can be filed under "niche parts."

by Anonymousreply 64June 6, 2017 8:43 PM

[quote]"I remember doing one job when they literally made me pull my shirt up and were grabbing my fat and going, 'You need to lose a bit of weight.' This other time they were slapping me. I felt like a piece of meat."

Finnick is very explicitly described in "Mockingjay" AS a piece of meat--because he's so sexy and muscular, as well as famous for having won the Hunger Games one year, he's well compensated in the Capitol as an escort for both men and women.

Did he think he was playing Al Bundy when he accepted the role? I have zero sympathy for him for that role. If you want to play Finnick, you'd better be ripped.

by Anonymousreply 65June 6, 2017 8:50 PM

At least he CARES about his weight!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 66June 6, 2017 8:55 PM

His body is fine. His face looks strange from the side.

by Anonymousreply 67June 6, 2017 9:02 PM

Body shaming? BWAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 68June 6, 2017 9:03 PM

Exactly r65. He knew he was competing for a character that is meant to be a beefcake. If you didn't want that role, don't go for it.

It is absurd because every actor in LA wanted that role and his ass somehow managed to land it, and here he is complaining "wah, it made me feel bad that they wanted me to look good shirtless"

by Anonymousreply 69June 6, 2017 9:26 PM

R64, both of those actresses get leading roles in major studio releases. They're not relegated to sidekick roles or only getting leading parts in indies. If they qualify for niche roles, then there aren't any roles that don't fit that standard.

by Anonymousreply 70June 6, 2017 9:39 PM

Is "shame" edible?

by Anonymousreply 71June 6, 2017 9:57 PM

It's like he's Val Kilmer without Batman or Willow, but with extra lard on his lard sandwich.0

by Anonymousreply 72June 7, 2017 12:01 AM

I don't have much sympathy for Claflin. 1. Doubtless he made a ton of money on The Hunger Games movies. 2. There are plenty of roles that don't require a ripped physique and plenty of excellent young actors who don't have gym bodies and have carved out good careers for themselves. Ben Whishaw, Andrew Garfield, Gael Garcia Bernal, and Diego Luna come immediately to mind. 3. If it matters so much to him, how difficult is it to join a gym, eat right, and get in shape?

by Anonymousreply 73June 7, 2017 12:10 AM

[quote] Finnick is very explicitly described in "Mockingjay" AS a piece of meat--because he's so sexy and muscular, as well as famous for having won the Hunger Games one year, he's well compensated in the Capitol as an escort for both men and women.

I think that Kellan Lutz would have been perfect for that role.

He's very familiar with playing that part in real life, after all.

by Anonymousreply 74June 7, 2017 12:21 AM

[Quote] both of those actresses get leading roles in major studio releases. They're not relegated to sidekick roles or only getting leading parts in indies. If they qualify for niche roles, then there aren't any roles that don't fit that standard.

LOL

by Anonymousreply 75June 7, 2017 12:30 AM

You cannot compete for roles as hunks and then complain that people on the set want you be to be in great shape. That makes no sense.

If he wants, he can do what Vincent d'Onofrio did--d'Onofrio also had a very short period of playing hunks (in films like "The Wide, Wode World" and "the Cell"), but he felt it was too much work to stay in shape and he bloated out. d'Onofrio is good enough an actor that he got cast in great character roles. Maybe Claflin has the chops to do the same. if not, he needs to shut up, avoid the pasta, and hit the gym. He didn't earn $50 million because of brilliant acting abilities or a beautiful speaking voice--he got it because he can look pretty with his shirt off.

by Anonymousreply 76June 7, 2017 12:36 AM

R54, it's a limited class of films where the men are expected to look that unrealistic. Whereas women in even standard dramas or romantic comedies have to starve themselves to look like an "average" person.

R58, Katniss wasn't supposed to be emaciated at the time of the events of the movie. She's unusual in that she's not starving (because she can hunt for herself) and even though she's thin, she's also very strong. Frankly, having Lawrence play Katniss makes a hell of a lot more sense than having chickenbones Angelina Jolie play those characters in Wanted and Salt. Her fight scenes were fucking laughable. A woman who is physically strong is just not likely to look anorexic with zero muscle tone. Finnick on the other hand is supposed to be super athletic and a quick and skilled fighter. Men who fit that description are likely to be thin and ripped.

R70, even with their success those actresses are only getting a very limited class of roles.

by Anonymousreply 77June 7, 2017 2:02 AM

R73 what a dumb list of comparative examples. They are all thin and wiry. Andrew Garfield has even a tight and ripped body sometimes.

by Anonymousreply 78June 7, 2017 2:19 AM

R77, this isn't the stick-thin Ally McBeal era anymore. Jennifer Lawrence, ScarJo, Shailene Woodley, all stars of action franchises, aren't emaciated. They look like pretty young women who exercise and have a healthy diet. I don't know what to say if you think Shailene Woodley's body is that difficult to achieve for a woman her age, especially compared to how buff Theo James had to get to play opposite her.

And actresses like Schumer and McCarthy only get a limited class of roles, but so did Chris Farley and Kevin James. The point is that they're not excluded from starring in films because they don't conform to Hollywood's beauty standards. Every actor is only considered for certain roles, whether because of talent, persona, age, race or sex, so singling out those two as limited says nothing.

by Anonymousreply 79June 7, 2017 2:45 AM

R43 "A further measure, to come into force on 1 October, will require magazines, adverts and websites to mark images in which a model’s appearance has been manipulated with the words photographie retouchée (retouched photograph)."

I wish they'd do that with celebrities. We'd never see another Kardashian photo again.

by Anonymousreply 80June 7, 2017 2:45 AM

R79, as several of us have pointed out, the overall standards for women are much harsher. Using action movies or other films which inherently require a specific body type for examples is a distortion, since the real issue is body standards for "normal" roles. And don't know where you get the "I don't know what to say if you think Shailene Woodley's body is that difficult to achieve" from since no one's mentioned her. Shailene isn't exactly in high demand. But Emma Stone is.

Chris Farley and Kevin James get/got a limited class of roles, but John Goodman, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Jonah Hill didn't/don't. There aren't too many talented heavy women who get the variety of roles they do. Matt, Ben and Leo can put on the pudge without putting their leading man statuses at risk. Can you imagine if Charlize, Sandra or Jennifer were seen with a beer gut?

There is a LOT more body diversity among male actors, lead and character, than women.

by Anonymousreply 81June 7, 2017 3:06 AM

No, R81, you've repeated that as fact without backing it up. I gave you examples of women who star in major Hollywood franchises who have above-average bodies that are entirely achievable, and compared them to men who have to look like fitness models requiring a massive investment of effort. But, please, keep insisting that actresses have it so much harder than actors who have to do so much more. Robin Wright herself admitted during the "Wonder Woman" press tour that she was amazed how difficult it was to get in shape for that movie. Men have to put in more work to achieve what Hollywood demands.

And it's disingenuous to say that the standards apply to everything but action roles, when Hollywood releases mostly either action movies or comedies, and it's undeniable that comedies feature a diverse range of body types for men and women alike. The mid-budget Paramount thriller, for example, is dead.

No one mentioned Shailene until I did, but that's a convenient way of avoiding the issue. She is a star of a successful action franchise who merely had to remain in above-average shape, whereas her male costar had to be ripped. So how, exactly, are the standards for women so much harsher?

And I can remember when Charlize Theron appeared with a gut. She got an Oscar out of it. And whenever a leading man in his prime does that, they're probably going for the gold, too. It's either gain thirty pounds or lose it to get the statuette, and that's for men and women alike (De Niro and Theron for one, McConaughey and Portman for the other).

Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jonah Hill and John Goodman didn't get a limited class of roles? Are you fucking serious? All three are character actors, not any different from someone like Kathy Bates. They get the occasional leading role, but usually play supporting characters in major Hollywood releases. Are Hoffman's Hollywood roles really that different from what Bates got?

by Anonymousreply 82June 7, 2017 3:51 AM

[Quote] But, please, keep insisting that actresses have it so much harder than actors who have to do so much more.

That's because actresses do have it harder. In fact, you don't even need to be an actress. Women get judged on their appearance everyday.

by Anonymousreply 83June 7, 2017 3:57 AM

I was a very hot guy for 30 years and was judged on my appearance everyday. Then at 45, i hit the wall and became invisible. It was nice being judged on my appearance, and I miss it. Though I got mine so I can't really complain.

by Anonymousreply 84June 7, 2017 4:00 AM

Are you a famous actor, R84???

Give us a hint!

by Anonymousreply 85June 7, 2017 4:41 AM

Sam Claflin needs to shut his pretty pie-hole and get back to the gym.

chop-chop.

by Anonymousreply 86June 7, 2017 5:12 AM

Oh for Chrissakes.

"Using action movies or other films *which inherently require a specific body type* for examples is a distortion, since the real issue is body standards for "normal" roles."

"And I can remember when Charlize Theron appeared with a gut. She got an Oscar out of it."

Charlize gained the weight to resemble A SPECIFIC PERSON.

And then:

"Chris Farley and Kevin James get/got a limited class of roles, but John Goodman, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Jonah Hill didn't/don't. There aren't too many talented heavy women who get the variety of roles they do."

"Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jonah Hill and John Goodman didn't get a limited class of roles? Are you fucking serious? All three are character actors, not any different from someone like Kathy Bates."

You came up with one woman in response.

by Anonymousreply 87June 7, 2017 5:13 AM

I read a magazine interview with him last year and he was lamenting about his low leading man status in Hollywood. He said he only received scripts all the top stars and ones a bit lower passed on. I know that's usually how it works, but he sounded douchey about it and his "first world problems". I don't remember the name of the publication, I'll have to look it up.

by Anonymousreply 88June 7, 2017 6:35 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 89June 7, 2017 6:39 AM

It's nice that the interviewer deleted the sobbing "... and then he raped me!" punchline of this drama queen actor's interview.

by Anonymousreply 90June 7, 2017 12:08 PM

I fucking love R42

by Anonymousreply 91June 7, 2017 9:22 PM

And also R90.

by Anonymousreply 92June 7, 2017 9:32 PM

HIs wife is gorgeous. She was Peter Quill's mom on GOTG.

by Anonymousreply 93June 8, 2017 6:26 AM

...and these attitudes are why you're not going to see a lot more male full frontal in movies.

At least involving good actors

by Anonymousreply 94June 8, 2017 6:47 AM

R94 Just had to ruin the fantasy 😒

by Anonymousreply 95June 8, 2017 11:30 AM

I saw My Cousin Rachel. Claflin ruined the film. He can't act his way out of a paper bag. Total fashion model pretending to be an actor.

by Anonymousreply 96June 19, 2017 7:40 PM

Realistically, how many hours per day would a 35 y o man have to put into gym time to maintain an ideal body (assuming a low cal diet)?

by Anonymousreply 97June 19, 2017 8:13 PM

Sam has beautiful child-bearing hips at R89.

by Anonymousreply 98June 19, 2017 11:48 PM

Interesting face.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 99July 27, 2017 1:58 AM

Oh wow, that garden gnome thinks he's people! Give him a biscuit, or cracker, or whatever the fuck they eat in Middle Earth.

by Anonymousreply 100July 27, 2017 2:00 AM

About his haircut in the OP, my Ma once remarked on a similar haircut: "In my day, we wouldn't go out of the house with hair like that."

by Anonymousreply 101July 27, 2017 2:03 AM

I avoid pools and beaches because: 1) I'm pale; 2) I'm a bit pudgy; and 3) I don't workout.

Also I have a little hair on my back. What's the point of waxing when it just grows back?

by Anonymousreply 102July 27, 2017 2:08 AM

[quote] Oh wow, that garden gnome thinks he's people! Give him a biscuit, or cracker, or whatever the fuck they eat in Middle Earth.

Lembas bread.

And more lembas bread.

Oh am we taste manflesh occasionally.

by Anonymousreply 103July 27, 2017 2:25 AM

Trashy looking.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 104July 27, 2017 2:30 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 105March 13, 2018 3:42 PM

r54, but women have to fuck with their face eventually, while it's okay for a guy to age and still be considered handsome.

by Anonymousreply 106March 13, 2018 4:25 PM

Trailer for his new movie with DL foe Shailene Woodley.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 107March 14, 2018 4:58 PM

This guy is such a douche bag, who cares?

by Anonymousreply 108March 14, 2018 7:03 PM

[quote]my Ma once remarked on a similar haircut: "In my day, we wouldn't go out of the house with hair like that."

Your ma never excelled much at originality did she?

by Anonymousreply 109March 14, 2018 7:07 PM

Sad for someone like him -- not American, young, 'hot' actor, male, able-bodied -- to be so fat. 15% body fat isn't that hard.

by Anonymousreply 110March 15, 2018 11:47 AM

Looking good but he pretty much has the same facial expression in all of the photos. Why didn't the photographer tell him to switch it up a bit? It's not like he's an A-lister who can't be criticized.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 111April 13, 2018 7:51 PM

🔥

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 112April 13, 2018 8:14 PM

When will men learn that the only thing that looks good with a beer belly is a beercan cock.

by Anonymousreply 113April 13, 2018 8:21 PM

oh misread--if you give yourself a whores body people treat you like a whore

by Anonymousreply 114April 13, 2018 8:39 PM

R16 I think the problem is, a lot of famous guys would look average body-wise without the steroid work. In other words, this is a way to make an average body look hot. Or what passes as hot today.

Having a hot natural body is rare. It requires great bone structure, beautiful proportions. You don't need gym work to the max then, just keep in shape.

For women, it's being skinny. A lot of actresses are really average, they are seen as hot only because they are very thin.

by Anonymousreply 115April 13, 2018 8:44 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!