For those still confused, Phantom is brilliant because of how it envelops you in a gothic mysterious world and gives you memorable tunes and memorable visuals. Really, the direction and set/costume design are exquisite. Sure the characters aren't that compelling, save the titular one, but the piece moves along at a good enough pace. That being said I can understand why some people would see it and hate it. I don't think every cast brings the same magic to the show, and it does take really good performers to make some of the characterizations work. Wasn't Sarah Brightman compared to a deer in headlights because of her wide-eyed acting? And yet that's exactly what Christine is for most of the show. Wide-eyed. Raoul is dull. Meg hardly registers as a person. Carlotta and Phantom are the most dynamic players. But clearly in terms of spectacle, it is a must-see. I can completely understand why it's still on Broadway and I hope it stays there for a long time.
I really did not understand Spring Awakening's appeal. Do I want to see a bunch of contemporary kids staring me down in the face with microphones in their hands like there are auditioning for some kind of O Town band all dressed in period costumes? No, I do not. I had no reference point for the show going into it and it did a piss-poor job of explaining what the hell was happening. It's basically all about the importance of teaching sex ed in high school right? Because if you don't, kids have sex and die? Something like that. Set in...Germany...? Scandinavia...? In the....1500s...? 1600s...? I give up.
Can anyone explain to me how there are fans of Chess? I'll admit that some of the songs are little interesting or catchy, but that's being pretty generous. The show itself is a complete and utter mess. Yet it seems to be a favorite amongst the theater folk. Hun.
I have tried to like Les Mis but I just find it dreary as all hell. I guess that's the point. I just don't understand how people would want to watch multiple productions of it. It's so one-note to me. The Original London cast recording is great though.
To whoever walked out of the original Broadway production of Dreamgirls...what the hell is the matter with you? You saw Jennifer Holliday sing that song and you didn't want to come back for Act 2?
I'm surprised Passion even came up in this discussion. That show is really depressing and I'm pretty sure only appeals to 2% of the musical loving population.
I was astonished that Sunset Boulevard did as well as it did with Glenn Close back in the title role. She really can barely sing, and that's going by my memories from the 90s. And she acted like a complete idiot as Norma losing her mind. If you take away the lavish sets all it leaves you with is a hammy cuckoo Norma and a bunch of ridiculously insipid filler scenes with Joe and The Supporting Cast. Who cares? It takes a really great actress to make Norma work, and it takes a hell of a lot of eye candy to make the show tolerable. You need that giant house set and as many other tricks up your sleeve as possible to distract from the score and lyrics.
Speaking of which... Jekyll and Hyde! Holy crap is that a dumpster fire! I actually feel kind of badly for Linda Eder because she has an amazing voice and this is the one thing she's best known for. Someone Like You sounds like a Disney song and what the hell it has anything to do with a prostitute in the middle of the Jekyll and Hyde story is beyond me. Murder Murder!! Wow. Subtle.
I love the Sound of Music movie, but I don't think I could sit through a stage version.