Psych Professor SWARMED by Narcissistic SJW Over His Trans Position

This madness has to stop...but how?

A bitch is a bitch is a bitch. This woman is just a total asshole and probably lying.

We should not use "they" for them but "it". Grammatically it's the only right thing.

"it's a very annoying and it should die in fire" sounds good for me.

But is "It" a pro-noun?

I'm impressed by Dr. Peterson's ability to maintain his composure. These "activists" have no desire to engage in an actual conversation or debate.

The Trans and genderqueer crowd now have more on campus organizations and advocacy groups than lesbians and gays. What are they complaining about? At my university, gays have been completely erased. You have to check out the ridiculous events our "Queer Collective" (people complained about calling it LGBT so they changed the name):

^holds

[Quote] have no desire to engage in an actual conversation or debate.

They act the same way on tumblr.

Gross. The only interesting thing here is that the guy in the red and black checkered shirt looks like he has a big dick.

According to the idiot making the video many young trans people have killed themselves because they've been misgendered. So, the way to resolve this problem is to refer to them - especially to their face - by the pronouns that match with their biological sex, and hopefully that will cause as many of them as possible to kill themselves.

They kill themselves cause they have psychological problems and are often depressed.

Being depressed kills them, not being misgendered.

As for mortality, they're often sex workers and sex workers have high mortality rates.

Just like gay pornstars but gay pornstars don't compalin all day long;

R11 they say being called He or She instead of They causes the trigger of Depression

It is trigger NOT to be called "they"

That's bullshit, they are depressed and being misgendered "could" perhaps aggravate their depression, but if they were psychologically healthy being misgendered would not trigger anything.

R6 what is your major in University?

Up is down.

Misgendering could cost you $250,000 in NYC.

I'm glad to see that he stands his ground and it doesn't turn into another groveling apology session, and that there are other students there who have his back, instead of one guy trying to be heard above a bellowing mob.

These people would get a much more receptive audience for their position if they didn't take what seems to be the SOP screeching-confrontation-with-officious-announcement-that-this-is-being-recorded mode.

Also, he's one of the best-looking psych professors I've ever seen. Most of them look like Michael Moore--men or women.

[quote]According to the idiot making the video many young trans people have killed themselves because they've been misgendered.

That's not true, of course. It's just childish "If you don't do what I say I will KILL MYSELF!" guilt-tripping.

Everything about this movement is infantile and regressive.

Were most SJWs raised by single moms? I'm not trying to sound condescending. I want to figure out the upbringing that creates them. Even if they were, I know there would be other factors involved.

You're brave R19.

Slap all these twats silly already.

They're only seeking attention after all.

I was raised by a single mom and I find all this SJW and especially the trans stuff idiotic and even offensive; my mom was a serious person who, while working full time and raising me, put herself through college to become a nurse; she suffers no fools and taught me to respect truth and facts.

R22, if I'm right that a disproportionate number of SJWs were raised by single moms, I don't think they'd be similar to yours. I think they'd be the kind of moms who let their kids do whatever they want, giving them no sense of structure.

This madness has to stop...but how?

ZYKLON-B

All of this nonsense with the correct pronouns to use is like the nonsense about the correct acronyms to use.

R24, I feel terrible for laughing at that.

I think you'll find that most SJWs come from two parent families, but where the mother may be dominant and indulges in a fantasy world; I also think the culture at large -- which has increasingly celebrated science fiction/fantasy/manipulated "reality" series at the expense of realistic films/tv series, and the inculcation that "nothing is impossible" and "you can do/be anything you want" -- has played a role in it. We need to be reminded that, you know what, there ARE something's that are impossible, such as changing one's biological sex.

[Quote]This madness has to stop...but how?

ZYKLON-B

Yes, a Final Solution to the SJWish question.

I don't see that shit in real life. I wouldn't deal with any of them.

I don't see much, if any, overlap in SJWs and sci-fi nerds and geeks. I think that overlap would be there if that theory were true. I do think the mothers play a big role in shaping SJW mentality but I'm not sure what it is. I agree that these kids were likely fed a "nothing is impossible" stream of affirmations growing up.

There does tend to be considerable overlap between trans (of the straight male autogynphile type) and interest in sci-fi/fantasy.

[quote]But is "It" a pro-noun?

Oh, dear.

[quote]people complained about calling it LGBT

Finally.

[quote]the guy in the red and black checkered shirt looks like he has a big dick.

Does that make him a guy or a girl in this context?

misgendering = MURDER

[the guy in the red and black checkered shirt looks like he has a big dick.]

I noticed the same thing. I wonder how friendly he could be?

What is the university? The whole thing is absurd, and blocks really policy changes for the transgender community. You cannot force people to undo the gender and grammar they have been taught and used.

University of Toronto

R38 Oh, Canada....

They are great, but I weep for them in these instances..

I haven't watched the whole video but most of the people there seem to support Peterson. I would like to get a look at the lone psycho SJW screaming behind the camera.

I want the professor in my boudoir.

From the pages of the site at R6:

"WHAT'S WITH THE Q? AND THE MGSRI? WHY NOT LGBT*?

Historically used as a derogatory term for MGSRI people, the word QUEER has been reclaimed by many within these communities as an umbrella or fluid term. Since we strive to create a diverse and inclusive community, we have chosen to use a word which does not point to a single identity or group of identities.

We have chosen to use MGSRI instead of LGBTQ* or some other acronym for a similar reason. We feel that acronyms such as LGBTQ, no matter how long, invariably prioritize some identities, exclude others, and define visibly what labels are a part of the community. We feel that MGSRI (Marginalized Gender/Sexuality/Romatic Identities) more inclusively describes the community we serve while allowing people to define for themselves what labels, if any, they'd like to apply to their identity."

My insurance agent has been living as a woman for over 30 years. She has had full surgery. She still has regrets and recriminations. I have not mentioned the current tranny situation over the last few years, but I get the impression that she is not amused.

I believe that it is a mental illness. Or a cry for help.

I reject terms like MGSRI and MOGAI and MOGII. I am a gay man. I am not a marginalized gay man and I will not define myself by the ridiculous bullshit terms that these idiots develop in order to make themselves feel special. The entirety of my existence is not my sexual orientation or my sex or my gender. MGSRI and MOGAI and MOGII are disempowering and they do not inclusively describe any community other than the community of those enjoy wallowing in their carefully crafted and vigorously maintained sense of victimhood.

[quote]the community of those who enjoy wallowing in their carefully crafted and vigorously maintained sense of victimhood.

Well-wrought description, r44. If that were printed on a t-shirt I'd wear it.

R23 I wouldn't expect these overly coddled, self entitled, arrogant fuckwits to be the product of a single parent household. Mostly single moms are not financially able nor have enough time to indulge the idiotic mental meanderings of the look-at-me snowflakes.

why don't they just call it what they really want to call it?

NTD-SWP

Not those devils- straight, white people.

Is it Romatic or Romantic?

[quote]I'm impressed by Dr. Peterson's ability to maintain his composure. These "activists" have no desire to engage in an actual conversation or debate.

I agree r5. Rule one in the SJW playbook seems to be to throw out an accusation and then shout down any effort to actually address the accusation.

You do have to laugh at the veiled "I'm recording this" threat when the SJWs always end up making bigger fools of themselves that the person they're trying to badger.

Speaking of showing true colors...

"I've been denied housing for being trans!"

I'd put money on them being denied housing because the landlord knew they were going to be total pains in the ass.

Also, nice how they silence the people of color by editing out the part when they are speaking in favor of the professor.

They put gender first because they are implying it is more important. Fuck that and fuck them!

He was possibly denied housing - because his ass is broke.

R50 It 's a university so I kind of doubt anyone is DENIED student housing because they're trans. More likely a personality conflict between randomly university assigned roommates. Happens all the time for many reasons.

I actually agree with you and r52 though. When it comes to the real world of business SJW credentials count for nothing. It's only about whether you'll be an asset or a liability to the business.

oh, boy.

I hate the overuse of SJW just as much as these bullshit new acronyms. MGSRI??? That sounds like it should be in the new DSM.

On SNL, Cecily Strong was doing her "annoying girl you don't want to run into at a party" bit and at one point started yelling "Sis! Sis!" Asked if her sister was in the audience, she said no, she was pointing out all the cisgenders.

They are inmature, needy brats void of critical thinking and showing respect.

Trans is a personal decision.

Son of a single mom and no I'm not an SJW since we had real issues to worry about growing up. Grew up in the projects and we are immigrants. We had it tough but financially we're on an upswing. Neither of us lives in the projects anymore.

All the SJWS I know are spoiled cunts. One of them pretends to love black people yet has no black friends. All his friends are lily white. He lives in williamsburg and receives help from his rich parents while he finds a sustainable "social media " career yet he still has the nerve to complain about gentrification. I know another one who loves to sleep with people of color! But only people of color who fulfill the stereotype of macho hung tops. Despite always hunting for BBC his bfs are always white. Always. His parents also used to pay for his rent. I know another one who thinks Lena Dunham is the voice of our generation and that she's inspirational for being a rape survivor. Enough said.

These are spoiled kids whose dumb rich liberal parents spoiled them growing up. Being so spoiled they are shocked to learn of all injustice on this world outside of their lily white homes. They realize that this imbalance is cause by rich people and despite being rich themselves, they don't realize they are part of the imbalance. So it's easier for them to blame billionaires. This way they can justify claiming to be supressed too.

Oh, so much to say here, where to begin...

1) I'd totally bang Professor Peterson. Not only for what he is saying and that he kept his cool dealing with this barrage of crazy -- but he's got that "kinda sexy, rolled-up sleeve, laid back, professor vibe you wanted to call daddy" in college...lol, moving on.

2) These people are victims and are looking for a backdoor or excuse to justify their victimhood than actually deal with it. Of course, the only way to transcend (no pun intended) all of this is to shift consciousness, but you can't speak to a wall that will not hear anything other than their victimhood being exponentially heightened. The truth is they actually LOVE people like the professor and need him to keep his views. Their life force is doing exactly what you see them doing on the video right there.

3) The middle-eastern looking "trans" guy with the bleached swoop on his head is just a gay dude that needs a cause, a reason. Its unfortunate that these people can't find the light-heartedness in living and go beyond PRONOUNS -- they have literally identified their essence with fucking PRONOUNS.

4) Whether they would admit it or not, not all Trans people would be ok with that pronoun because many of them want to actually be referred to as HE or SHE (usually what they have transitioned or are transitioning to) -- and would be offended by they/their.

There is no satisfying these people -- and the fact they think changing legislation to require people to refer to them based on what makes THEM feel better is, like the title of the thread says, completely NARCISSISTIC.

Girl, Bye. And yes, I do mean Girl.

I'm very impressed with Dr. Peterson. Would love to have had him as a professor, clearly intelligent and thoughtful, and a teacher by nature.

The word of the motherfucking year is "refugee". Typical Trans making it ALL about themselves. Hypocritical projection thy name is Trans. The hairy male wearing nothing feminine whatsoever wishes to be referred to as "they" and "them"......well, "they" came go fuck "them"selves. Entitled, shrieking sociopaths. I , also, note the appropriation of the "gay panic" defense. The professor should have refused to engage with their bullshit. They truly are SCUM.

Under Stalin she would be worm food.

We had the same argument in the 70s with the term "Ms."

Regardless of anyone's chosen pronoun, I find it interesting that a group of angry SJW's is termed a "swarm".

I would have thought that mob or gang or cadre or hive or gaggle or bloc or horde or throng or pack or even crowd would have been chosen.

But, swarm it is.

Isn't "narcissistic SJW" a redundancy?

For all you fans who have a crush on the Professor

New interview and watch towards the end where he daintily places his hands on his knees. & He wears cowboy boots.

Tough that he is married

R63 on a previous thread we called it a "complaint" of SJW's, which is still my personal fave 😆

This professor is fantastic, saying what needs to be said, although I don't think he goes far enough to rejecting the trans ideology completely. I like the comparison to Fahrenheit 451 in the video at r65; it's that book plus 1984 and Brave New World all rolled into one with the trans/non-binary insanity.

R66 - that one cannot be beat.

Thank you.

this is so interesting..

An Ontario current affairs program had him on tonight. I didn't get a chance to watch but posted here for those interested.

This is actually of broader concern because of the Parliamentary bill being debated right now that is very draconian in restricting free speech around the trans issue.

Prof Peterson says he is willing to go on a Hunger Strike if he is jailed over his refusal to use gender neutral pronouns

Canada has huge SJW problems. Each large city seems overrun by toxic complaints of SJWs.

A female right wing reporter covering the Peterson case was recently assaulted on film by a "female" SJW. (You see, they can film you all day but you can't film them.) Smugglypuff, a witness who looks like Eric Cartman's cousin Itt, smugly told cops nothing happened.

At least the karma dido fucked her/him/it later. When a random couple walking their dog started taking pics of the protest Sugglypuff attacked them and stole and broke their smartphones. She was arrested.

Do you think she will risk a harsher sentence and identify as male at court, or risk suicide and misgender itself as female?

Maybe the 'they' goal is to embiggen their complaints? Ex:, "You have to leave the Halloween party because THEY feel uncomfortable around someone dressed as a sexy skeleton."

By the way, where the fuck did all the pearl-clutchers go? A few weeks ago this thread would have been metastasized with accusations of us all being freepers for making fun of SJWs and every comment a tranny kills itself.

If they're renaming "LGBT" to "Queer", this gives normal gays an out.

Just define ourselves as too privileged and boring to be queer, and we have our own gay rights organizations.

Seems like the SJWish problem might solve itself.

Also, "Smugglypuff". Hee. I like the way the internet's slowly building up a taxonomy of these creatures.

R4: If a human is neither male nor female, it would be grammatically correct to refer to them as "it". You would have to use pronouns attributed to the neuter gender when referring to said person in a sentence.

English is not my first language so pardon my mistakes but I think current pronouns with these Tarnies will be "It" because thats how I use pronouns for animals

R24, but then the QUEER orgs will have no funding.

If we evolve to the point of using "they" for everyone; if connecting clothing and hairstyles with any gender is shot down and discouraged to the point of ludicrousness (so that, "I knew I was a girl because I wanted to wear a dress and play wtih dolls" is no more ridiculous than, "I knew I was a girl because I hated peas and loved Brussels sprouts"), would trans still find a way to assert a different language that they mandate and monitor to catch us at a mistake? Because I think they would. I think it's about outrage and catching me at a mistake. I've watched progressive teachers stumble while trying to please everyone and be caught at a mistaken pronoun, and corrected without grace or patience.

R79 here again. Sorry to hog but I finished watching the video. Excellent discussion comprising intelligent, thoughtful people who let one another express their differing views. Viva Canada.

One sentence from that discussion that made me howl was something trans professor (professor of trans studies) said: "We shouldn't be talking about free speech, we should be talking about..." We shouldn't be talking about free speech? Ha. Is that one of the rare examples of true irony or what?

I'm for bringing back thee and thou to solve this problem. It will add a little class to the issue.

And bring back doth while we're at it.

"Will thou doth get the fuck away from me? Thou art in my personal space.

I know plenty of people like this girl, or whatever it is. Fatiguing.

Maybe its a result of having an almost impossible to pronounce last name, but I don't care what anyone calls me.

If I walked up on this, I'd support that Professor even if he was advocating drowning dachshund puppies just because I don't think constant whiney victims should win.

r79 what you describe is the tranny nightmare. They need gender stereotypes to survive. After all what makes people like smuggly "trans" is that zhi likes to wear a hoodie and beanie which is obviously so "male" zer must be a man with a front hole.

"You really think you're worth all of that time?"

What a bitch.

How about he, she or annoying.

LOL!

How DARE you not call me by my "xiradapmemz" and "xizambethermud" pronouns! Like it's not THAT hard for you to bend over backwards in order not to offend me!

Agreed, R44 - gay and MOGAI/queer/alphabet soup are not the same. The entire effort to expand gay rights organizations to include every sexual preference outside missionary married het sex because they're purportedly transgressive and so homosexuality goes in the box with all the other sexual deviates, chucks gays into the "sexual weirdo" category. It's homophobic to the core.

R81 - I think the next time I'm at an event where they go around and ask people's pronouns, I'll tell them my pronouns are thou/thee/thyself. Hell, at some events, they offer you pronoun stickers. I have an excellent poker face and would love to lodge a complaint in all seriousness that they are being exclusive of anachrongender people and are fostering a hostile environment contributing to the literal murder of anachrongender people. The evidence is abundant. Think about it - of all the people who used thou/thee/thyself, most of them are dead.

Here is Dr Jordan B. Peterson [the guy in the vid, natch]'s Patreon link, if you want to support him.

New interview/debate with Peterson facing off against non-binary professor at the same school

He is cute...

R90: Professor Peterson wins with facts, not feels.

R90 LOL at the professor being non-binary and trans. Isn't the point of being trans transiting from one gender to the other? This person went from FEMALE to MALE and is now non-binary as well? Why bother with the transitioning then? So dumb.

Also, his solution is to use a smartphone so every time you encounter a person you can take the phone out and look up the preferred pronouns of that person. God how tedious. Imagine the narcissism and entitlement it requires to expect others to go out of their way JUST so that they don't call you "he" or "she"! But apparently if the other person does not give in to your ridiculous demands, they are "lazy".

The UofT campus has been swamped with trannies taking gender studies exclusively for a decade now.

Think about it, who DEMANDS the use of certain titles and pronouns, traditionally?

His office door was crazy glued today

The students who did that need to be charged for vandalism as they are no longer minors.

[quote]Gender expression is best expressed as one word: "Fashion"

YES. YES. YES.

That freak at R90 is a huge part of the problem. It isn't just a dumb millenial student (who uses "its" phone to look up pronouns!!!) but a TENURED university professor. Viva Canada? Nope!

[quote]We should not use "they" for them but "it". Grammatically it's the only right thing.

I agree.

Let me get this straight: apparently a law was presented and is going to be discussed that adds gender identity to the list of protected categories. The law makes it mandatory to use preferred pronouns (not only he and she, but every single stupid made-up word a special snowflake might decide to use that day). Long story short, not only people would be forced to not misgender, but they would be forced to use words they don' t want to use or be fined/jailed. Basically, it' s thought/word policing. This is why he is talking about this, because he considers it an infringement of freedom of speech.

Am I getting this right?

"But apparently if the other person does not give in to your ridiculous demands, they are 'lazy.'"

Or criminal, R93.

Yes, R101, that's correct.

Yes. 2 year sentence for "misgendering".

R101 no that is not right. This is a bill that adds trans rights to the Humans Rights Legislation. There is nothing in the bill about calling someone by their preferred name. However by adding trans as a class of people that cannot be discriminated against, it opens the door for trans people to take other people to court if they are not called a name they wish to be addressed by.

99.9% of the public uses pronouns based on SEX not GENDER. Am I insane or do we not? I only think of myself as a man because I have a penis. That's literally the only reason. I also refer to my cat Roxie as a she because she has a vagina. Our culture has NEVER considered gender when using pronouns. Ask any random person why they consider themselves a he or a she and they'll mention their anatomy.

Your pussy has a PUSSAY!

I could give a fuck about the pronouns but the enforcement of language use and related punitive consequences are ridiculous.

R104, so there is nothing in the bill about making preferred pronouns mandatory... but given the people we are talking about, what I wrote will happen anyway because they will find a way to make it happen?

The OP

R109 = retarded

Let's see how this develops.

The Sami have NEVER repeat NEVER been treated like black people or even as bad as Native Americans.

OF course that is her point, but she doesn't know how actual people of color are treated even in her beloved homeland.

Le prof is hot. I want to make love to him.

R105, yes, that's it. I just had a nonbinary person explain to me that gender is not sex. If that's the case, then I don't want to acknowledge anyone's gender. I acknowledge only sex, and I too am a female only because I have a vagina.

If gender is fluid, why are you pinning it down with a label, ravaging your body with hormones and surgery, and changing documents to reflect a moving target?

Ok, you absolutely need to watch Peterson's interview with Dave Rubin; this is one of the most intelligent, profound and even moving examinations of trans, SJW and free speech -- he brings in psychology, philosophy, history, for a challenging examination of the topic.

The gender non-binary is such a libertarian notion, one wonders why libertarians are against it.

Anti-transgender bigotry isn't going to be tolerated, nor should it be. There is nothing further to discuss.

How Stalinesque of you, r117.

"There is nothing further to discuss."

Get her, girls!

Poo, no one cares how many sockpuppets you use and how often you push this tired old shit. We don't care. We're not going to go out and attack trannies, you dumb cunt. The answer is no.

Did anybody say attack trannies? No. Besides, you can't attack them if they're not real. A man in a dress is not a woman. A woman in pants is not a man. It's time people started paying attention to facts and reality.

Liberals had better cut the crap with this or we'll risk losing the title of the party of reason and science.

You can't go on and on about the evils of global warming and at the same time argue that a man can become a woman simply by wishing is so.

You are not with us, you are with Fuckface von Clownstick and you have always been with him. The sooner you stop pretending, the better. You know what we say to you?

R63

It's a actually called a triggering of SJWs.

R80

Free speech and socialism are antithetical.

For socialism to work all dissent must be destroyed.

Oh I don't know about all free speech or all dissent but we can certainly destroy you, dear, and no one would even notice except for a blessed silence and a new lightness in the air.

For socialism to work, one must know its true definition, which FOX does not provide.

R125, that's exactly what Peterson talks about in his interview with Rubin at r115. Like I said, a serious must-watch.

R123, Fuckface von Clownstick doesn't have a problem with trannies. Indeed, the Transgender Ideology is, at its root, a deeply conservative concept.

R104

That is the flaw in human rights legislation. Human rights should be based on self ownership. Your body, your mind, your sexuality, your property, your family, etc. should be protected from aggression, fraud and theft.

By confusing human rights with socialism, where things like healthcare and education and housing are considered "rights", the left has destroyed itself. It has swallowed the Keynesian big government bullshit so thoroughly that it cannot even understand individual liberty.

The only natural rights are negative – that means that you are left alone as long as you do not harm anyone. Socialist rights are positivist – they require that the government forces productive people to subsidize the indigent and lazy.

R107

Welcome to the wonderful world of cultural Marxism!

Fuckface von Clownstick, Mike Pence, South Carolina's McCrory and the Republican Party Platform ALL came out foursquare behind persecuting trannies.

If you're attacking trannies and supporting these ridiculous bathroom bills then you are with Fuckface von Clownstick, Mike Pence, McCrory, the Republican Party Platform and homophobes everywhere. I wish you joy of them, my dear.

R116

Libertarian?

How so? The central issue for Libertarians is individual rights, and Dierdre McClosky is a very well respected libertarian economics professor, but even she doesn't deny the right of people to discriminate.

If you don't want to be around trans, you should have the right to self segregate.

Lol at r122

Logic and reason are not words closely associated with mushy headed proponents of collectivism.

R127

Please enlighten me. If the millions killed by socialism had only known your secret...

R131

Trump and his cronies are just big government fascists. So called liberals have given the government massive powers, and now that power is wielded by a narcissistic buffoon.

Liberals believe people are too stupid to live their lives without proper guidance. Only government schools can properly educate, only good liberal voices are worthy of attention, only proper government can keep people from doing bad things. People who have individualist libertarian beliefs are a danger to their society. Just like the pogroms in China and Cambodia and the USSR, universally directed at the universities and artists, dissenting thought cannot be tolerated in a socialist society.

Slimo Breitshart shitting in a tree

R131 recognising that mentally unstable men are not, in fact, biological women doesn't make me Republican it makes me rational.

It makes you a neo-nazi-wannabee, or at least that's who you're hanging around with so that's what we all see.

The whole concept of "jenn-durr" is bigotry against women and gay men both in theory and in practice. The ones pushing it are the ones who belong in jail. Forever.

Socialism is based on utilitarian morals, which is the greatest good to the greatest number, which is a preferable moral system to yours. It is also the implied theory behind democracy.

Doesn't matter. Whine all you want to, bitch and carp and whine and carry on all day. Pitch an absolute hissy fit, girls.

Go ahead and vote for Fuckface von Clownstick and Mike Pence - we don't care. The Trannies already beat you.

R115

Listening to the video while I paint.

Had to stop and rewind at the 33M mark-

The fact that the university was pressuring him due to their own liability (if your employer doesn't stop "hate" speech then the government says they are liable for damages) and that the university would allow him to speak on his own behalf IF he didn't reiterate his opposition to speech codes- both of those assertions seem so insane I had to check.

Now if you say something the government doesn't like, and your university does not stop you, then the university will be penalized criminally.

That is a collectivist version of free speech.

None of that has anything to do with the government, dumbass.

Bigots are stupid, quelle surprise.

R115

Solzhenitsyn, Frankl, Orwell, Huxley- the man knows his collectivist dystopias.

His summary of the themes of Pinocchio, about the heavy responsibility of freedom in the face of powerful temptations, brought a tear to my eye. Thanks for that.

R143

Government enforces these anti free speech laws you ignorant twat.

These cunts swung the election. Fuck 'em.

Pigs in wigs deserve to be persecuted. They're nothing but sexist homophobic scum.

R138 you truly are the moron's moron. Kudos.

R78, T are funded by Soros, drone manufacturers, US Army, etc, not by LGB.

I keep seeing this comment, r150: what would be their purpose?

R151 I can't remember the thread it was in but someone posted a link showing all Soros companies and the causes they funded, including the stealth funding by Soros-backed companies that on the surface appear to not be linked to Soros. It was an interesting read, very murky dealings and lots of pro-trans, pro-Muslim, pro-immigration orgs.

Yes, but, again, what is Soros' purpose? As a businessman, he would want stability; trans, Islam, immigration are, right, a source of instability. It doesn't compute.

Destroy the working classes social values and import cheap labour to ensure unions and basic living wage are a thing of the past?

Soros is a globalist provocateur, he makes $ from chaos and currency manipulation.

Not Mr. Rogers running the corner store.

Why trannies? To create chaos, to usher in Newspeak and global control of free speech, to advance a depopulation agenda, etc.

Listen to what the professor says in interviews above.

Think 1984, Brave New World, Margaret Atwood, etc and think about the impacts of T chaos on Western societies.

Thank you, r155.

R155 R156 Here's the Transexual Trump should nominate as his Transexual Interests Advisor. She'd sort it all out for him.

A new interview with this professor Jordan Peterson.

Life Spectator:

Jordan Peterson and the transgender wars The psychology professor is in trouble with the transgender crowd. He is also one of the foremost thinkers of our age

At the University of Toronto, after receiving two written warnings, he has been in danger of losing his job following his announcement that he would refuse to use the preferred gender pronouns of students and faculty who don’t identify with their biological gender, to the fury of radical transgender activists. The use of such pronouns is mandatory under a recently instituted Canadian law, Bill C-16. Peterson rejects the injunction on free speech grounds. ‘I’m not going to cede linguistic territory to post-modernist neo-Marxists,’ he says. He has expressed the view that he might use the preferred gender pronoun of a particular person, if asked by that individual, rather than having the decision foisted on him by the state.

Free speech is a core value for him — the core value — and one that is becoming increasingly pressing, most recently (as I write this) with the resignation of the Labour shadow minister Sarah Champion after she made remarks in the Sun about Pakistani sex gangs and ran foul of what was considered acceptable by the Labour leadership. That elements of the left have begun to label free speech as somehow a ‘right-wing’ value is particularly rattling (although such censorious thinking has a long history in radical left ideology).

‘If I can’t say what I think, then I don’t get to think, and if I can’t think then I can’t orient myself in the world, and if I can’t do that, then I’m going to fall into a pit and take everyone else with me,’ Peterson says...

I remember the good old days when kids when to college in order to actually learn so they could then turn around and get a great job like doctor, lawyer or business mogul. Now they just go to protest and whine.

Good thing the automatons are coming to do the jobs these idiots won't even be educated enough to do.

IT just occurs to me that trans activists love to attack people who are essentially allies but are nowhere to be found when their enemies are passing oppressive laws. They'll stick it to Dan Savage but don't make a peep at Fox News or in the North Carolina statehouse.

Actually it seems that they go to college to hear their prejudices and personal preferences reinforced, and that's not just a problem with SJWs.

R160 Same way that gay activists would rather attack easy targets like Christians in Vermont than Muslims in the MIddle East who might chop their head off in response.

R162, that's nonsense. There's no way in which Christians are gay allies. All this professor guy said is he hates using "they."

r161 not entirely. I'm taking English this year as an undergrad and so far it's all been "FEMINIST and GENDER THEORY", and the teacher has loaded her slide deck with examples of it in all the obvious places (except, actual English literature): Disney movies, girls/boys toys, "why's the main hero always gotta be a STRAIGHT CIS MALE", movie clips, and the like. We have yet to actually READ any literature. Oh, we've discussed the book series Twilight.

R163 Did I say they were? No. I said gay activists (just like trans activists) always go after those they know they can bully without receiving a physical response. Just like those trans who were waving a gun in the face of some women last week.

R165, I said someone like Savage was essentially an ally but was gone after by trans activists for some perceived crime that I can't even remember. They'll scream at him and yet be absent when consequential legislation is being passed. Also, you're one of those Islam/sharia law loons so please please please shut up and go away.

This is how the left loses. I don't care what you call yourselves but this persecution complex makes me root against them. It's all so ridiculous.

R166 So you're okay with those who record themselves throwing gays off rooftops. But let's not even mention that and instead attack a baker over a fucking cake instead. Gotcha. Makes sense. You just proved my point, bitch.

R167 Like the dreamers going after Nancy Pelosi this week.

People like R168 would probably join in on throwing gay people off roofs but poses as an ally online to ... i dunno. Be an asshole? But the Judge Judy gif is ...basic.

Wear your dress. Call yourself Ima Nutter even if you were born John. But you can't make me see you as you would like to be seen. It's impossible. I'll ask your name and call you that. This shit is tiresome as hell and yep, will kill the Left. When the folks realize this (if ever), maybe we can live in peace. Otherwise, leave me the hell alone or I will have you arrested for harassment.

Do you ever contribute anything to a thread, R170, or do you just attack random posters all day and night? BLOCKED!

Obviously I contributed something you felt compelled to refute over and over and over and over. Say hi to all your Macedonian friends!

[quote]I said someone like Savage was essentially an ally but was gone after by trans activists for some perceived crime that I can't even remember.

How dare xu misremember mu?

"Your transogyny is LITERALLY killing me!!!"

Are these precious snowflakes doing anything in college that will give them marketable skills and real employment once they graduate? If I had a kid in college who was engaging in this SJW bullshit instead of applying him/herself to actual studies, internships etc. in order to be gainfully employed upon graduation I would be furious.

Great article, r158 -- thank you.

I agree r171

Omg.