Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Has Camilla Give Up Completely - How Does She Manage to Look So Bad?

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 362April 30, 2019 2:12 AM

Oohs got me purse - I'm dying for a fag!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1August 16, 2016 10:37 PM

I think she looks pretty good and will make a great Queen.

by Anonymousreply 2August 16, 2016 10:39 PM

We'll just put some expensive haute couture on her - and no one will notice....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3August 16, 2016 10:39 PM

I finks I've held up pretty good...all things considered!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4August 16, 2016 10:42 PM

There's an old saying that goes something like, "...by age 50 you have the face you deserve."

by Anonymousreply 5August 16, 2016 10:44 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 6August 16, 2016 10:48 PM

Wait---she's 70, right? I think she just eschews plastic surgery.

Of course "it's getting worse!" Things aren't going to get better for the old girl as she gets older.

by Anonymousreply 7August 16, 2016 10:49 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 8August 16, 2016 10:55 PM

R6, she has the wasted thin limbs and bloated torso of an alcoholic in that picture. Sort of the way Judy Garland and Whitney Houston looked at the end.

by Anonymousreply 9August 16, 2016 10:58 PM

Do they have Dentistry in England?

by Anonymousreply 10August 16, 2016 10:59 PM

Poor dention is a British tradition. A requirement for empire and the reason they are leaving the EU.

by Anonymousreply 11August 16, 2016 11:06 PM

The other Royals have decent teeth. I think she's a heavy smoker and she just doesn't care.

by Anonymousreply 12August 16, 2016 11:14 PM

What about bras?

Apparently she's not into those either, judging from how low those breasts are hanging.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13August 16, 2016 11:20 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14August 16, 2016 11:27 PM

She looks the same as she ever did. She looked seventy when she was 45, and now she looks seventy at seventy.

by Anonymousreply 15August 16, 2016 11:33 PM

Umm, what will you look like when you're 70ish. Hmm. I really don't think she looks all that bad for her age. Back when she was my current age, 50 , I thought she looked bad. But no so much anymore.

Yeah, true her discolored yellow teeth are a bit jacked up and also add yrs to her life and could use some fixing for sure. But I've noticed that the Brits aren't particularly concerned with their teeth -- I await an 'Attack of the Brits' for saying that. But, hey, its true.

By the way R5 I just turned 50 and look great. Thanks for that post. Made my day.

by Anonymousreply 16August 16, 2016 11:36 PM

Mrs. Potato Head, R9 !

She just needs a chic sheath dress to show off her lanky plastic limbs while concealing her starchy, bulbous body.

by Anonymousreply 17August 16, 2016 11:39 PM

Camilla, spare us the sight of your sagging tits.

by Anonymousreply 18August 16, 2016 11:40 PM

Truth be told - the Windsors are actually very cheap.

There's never any decent food in that damn castle!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19August 16, 2016 11:40 PM

She is a sporting Princess of Wales (whether she takes the title publicly or not) and will make a better queen than most of them. And if they try to suppress the title of queen consort, and Charles allows it, I hope she has him thrown into the Tower, declares an absolute monarchy a la Catherine the Great and releases photos of herself pegging Harry.

After all, it's not like she's the first alcoholic, chain-smoking, sneaky, haughty, homely, "fuck the proles and middle-class prisses who say 'fertilizer' instead of 'shit', slag-heap-bodied, lumpy, indiscreet and dry adulteress to take the throne. It's a British tradition. She's just the first to tick off all marks.

by Anonymousreply 20August 16, 2016 11:42 PM

Camilla's got kind of an "Ethel Kennedy" thing going on...

Maybe that's the looks she's going for.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21August 16, 2016 11:44 PM

She has ALWAYS been disgusting. Poor Diana. At least he could have dumped Diana for a poodle rather than a Rottweiler.

by Anonymousreply 22August 16, 2016 11:45 PM

Wow, R20, that some "defense" of Camilla.

I can only imagine what you'd say if you hated her.

by Anonymousreply 23August 16, 2016 11:46 PM

Does she still smoke?

by Anonymousreply 24August 16, 2016 11:49 PM

I think I look better when I'm standing next to Anne.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25August 16, 2016 11:50 PM

Well, I've been known to have a ciggy and drink on special occasions...

like Tuesday.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26August 16, 2016 11:52 PM

She's the type of upper class mare that doesn't really give a fuck what she looks like. And that's the word she'd use, since she's well known for her blue language.

by Anonymousreply 27August 16, 2016 11:54 PM

[quote]After all, it's not like she's the first alcoholic, chain-smoking, sneaky, haughty, homely, "fuck the proles and middle-class prisses who say 'fertilizer' instead of 'shit', slag-heap-bodied, lumpy, indiscreet and dry adulteress to take the throne. It's a British tradition. She's just the first to tick off all marks.

You made me laugh out loud, R20.

by Anonymousreply 28August 16, 2016 11:54 PM

Anne has a man's hairline, R25.

Hideous, wiry hair, too.

by Anonymousreply 29August 16, 2016 11:54 PM

Yes, R27, I know her type very well.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 30August 16, 2016 11:57 PM

The real thing!!!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 31August 16, 2016 11:57 PM

She was said in her youth to go horseback riding for hours, returning all sweaty, reeking of horse flesh, and change into her evening gown to entertain, without even touching soap and water...nasty old cunt.

by Anonymousreply 32August 17, 2016 12:00 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 33August 17, 2016 12:02 AM

She's no oil painting but she definitely doesn't look like a council estate resident. She's got typical posh horsey features.

by Anonymousreply 34August 17, 2016 12:06 AM

R33, OMG, she's aging like a serious alcoholic...

She looks so frail and stooped....

by Anonymousreply 35August 17, 2016 12:08 AM

Alcoholic, my dirty fanny!

So I enjoy a warm pint once in a while...go fuck yourself!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 36August 17, 2016 12:11 AM

I just can't see those two having sex.

And I think it's so terrible that the British have "God Save the Queen/King" as their national anthem. A national anthem is supposed to be uplifting to be about the people and the land, not crowing about how you wish a monarch will "long reign over us"

What a bunch of fucking peasants. Glad to be American and not involved with all that bootlicking.

Have some pride and self-respect, British!!

by Anonymousreply 37August 17, 2016 12:17 AM

I guess plastic surgery isn't a big thing over there like here in The States. She looks exactly the same since she came on the scene to me. Like shit.

by Anonymousreply 38August 17, 2016 12:17 AM

I think she looks fine in an English sort of a way.. Not like a plastic Housewife of Beverley Hills of course, which is what mature women are meant to look like - God forbid they look, you know, old-Ish. She is also chic. I hate fucking royalty btw, time they were given the heave, but I hate fucking misoginists more.

by Anonymousreply 39August 17, 2016 12:20 AM

R37 Yes, what a great system America has, where a man like Trump could well become President.

by Anonymousreply 40August 17, 2016 12:21 AM

She looks a thousand percent better than Diana does.

by Anonymousreply 41August 17, 2016 12:23 AM

"Charles, get me another Gin and Tonic - make a double!"

"Now who are these nice Pakis?"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42August 17, 2016 12:25 AM

I thought you were talking about Camilla that Norwegian whore who works at that Italian joint in the village. She's more of a cunt than Camilla is!

by Anonymousreply 43August 17, 2016 12:28 AM

You shut your whore mouth, R41!

Diana was everything and outclassed the pathetic "royals" by miles.

by Anonymousreply 44August 17, 2016 12:28 AM

R44 Notice that r41 uses present tense rather than past tense...

by Anonymousreply 45August 17, 2016 12:34 AM

Obviously Charles and Camilla are soulmates, and I'm not being sarcastic. Diana was married off when she was a virgin and 20 SOLELY for the purpose of breeding. Once her job was over she was tossed aside. Camilla is the love of Charles life

by Anonymousreply 46August 17, 2016 12:42 AM

I have a flask in my purse...

Dear God, this country smells like a fucking garbage tip...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 47August 17, 2016 12:43 AM

Diana kind of got what she deserved for being a gold digger. Charles has never been attractive and was 20 years older than her. Diana should have married for love instead of money.

by Anonymousreply 48August 17, 2016 12:44 AM

I actually feel bad for Camilla. It's not her fault that the tart Diana stole her man and tried to push her out of the picture. She had Charles first

by Anonymousreply 49August 17, 2016 12:46 AM

Diana was the most beautiful, charismatic woman ever.

I just loved her and am still sad that she's gone.

by Anonymousreply 50August 17, 2016 12:49 AM

Someone should give her a mop and bucket. If she's going to shuffle around looking like a charwoman, the country might as well get some work out of her.

by Anonymousreply 51August 17, 2016 12:51 AM

This thread proves that DianaFraus are the Frauiest of Fraus.

by Anonymousreply 52August 17, 2016 12:54 AM

Diana, the queen of the people's hearts was murdered by that nasty royal family. When they realized that she was pregnant with a muslim baby they took her out. How would it look for the King of England to have a half brother that is muslim?

by Anonymousreply 53August 17, 2016 12:57 AM

Diana had star power - she was magnificent!!!!

Charles couldn't handle it because everyone loved her. Even her foibles were endearing.

Love you forever, Di!

by Anonymousreply 54August 17, 2016 1:01 AM

Ummm....Kate's grandparents are (were) Jewish. And Diana's great..great....great...great....etc grandmother was from India.

A Muslim baby would just have expanded an already expanded gene pool.

by Anonymousreply 55August 17, 2016 1:01 AM

[quote]She was said in her youth to go horseback riding for hours, returning all sweaty, reeking of horse flesh, and change into her evening gown to entertain, without even touching soap and water...nasty old cunt.

Oh that is just GROSS!

by Anonymousreply 56August 17, 2016 1:02 AM

Kate is very Jewish, you can just tell.

So vulgar and crass.

by Anonymousreply 57August 17, 2016 1:02 AM

[quote]This thread proves that DianaFraus are the Frauiest of Fraus.

Nothing comes close to the antiquated fraus who obsess over the Royals and who constantly spout the rules of the throne nonsense. One wonders what will happen when William takes over and that horseshit is done away with for good. I guess no more commemorative plate shopping for them.

To them, Diana was always too modern because she wore dresses that showed the ankle!

by Anonymousreply 58August 17, 2016 1:11 AM

Oh, please. She looks fine for her age. Only thing I'd fix is that dental issue.

by Anonymousreply 59August 17, 2016 1:21 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 60August 17, 2016 2:02 AM

R30 - LMAO!!!

by Anonymousreply 61August 17, 2016 2:55 AM

William is a tiresome bore. Harry is the interesting hot one.

by Anonymousreply 62August 17, 2016 2:57 AM

Barely recovered when I scrolled up and saw R21.

by Anonymousreply 63August 17, 2016 2:57 AM

Harry is one sexy fucker!

And she...well, she still looks as if she doesn't care for bathing...smelly old cunt.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 64August 17, 2016 7:53 AM

Now that you mention it, Harry just keeps getting sexier.

Shame about his smelly old step-monster.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 65August 17, 2016 7:56 AM

Harry is perfection and definitely has Diana's spirit.

Love them both!

William can go suck a big bag of dicks. Useless and OVAH.

by Anonymousreply 66August 17, 2016 7:57 AM

Harry, Harry, Harry....Oh...Harry

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 67August 17, 2016 8:05 AM

Diana was the pretty and depressed, Camilla seems like less attractive physically but a happy person.

by Anonymousreply 68August 17, 2016 9:13 AM

R50 Please Diana was Muslim clean asshole/cut cock chaser. Once she got a taste of that dark meat she couldn't stop. The Pakistani doctor she fell in love with had parents who told Diana she was not fit to marry him. Serves her right. especially for dating modelizer Dodi Fayed.

by Anonymousreply 69August 17, 2016 9:27 AM

Camilla had plastic surgery about a year before her wedding to Charles. She got it done in NYC

by Anonymousreply 70August 17, 2016 9:30 AM

Camilla looks like as if Jacqueline Bisset had an ugly demented sister that was put away in a mental institution.

by Anonymousreply 71August 17, 2016 9:34 AM

Diana was and will always be my Queen!!!

She was so photogenic - I still have a glossy book from the 80's my father brought back from England.

It's all soft-focus and 80's Sloane Ranger fashions - I treasure it.

by Anonymousreply 72August 17, 2016 9:39 AM

And all Americans loved Princess Di - men and women.

My father - who is the opposite of starstruck - still talks about the time he saw her outside a hotel.

by Anonymousreply 73August 17, 2016 9:40 AM

The most beautiful woman ever...Princess Di.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74August 17, 2016 9:44 AM

Diana 4 Ever!

by Anonymousreply 75August 17, 2016 9:52 AM

I was in high school, lifting weights in my garage (tacky, I know) when my mother told me Princess Diana had just died.

I cried for hours. It was horrible. I still can't believe she's gone.

by Anonymousreply 76August 17, 2016 9:59 AM

r25 Are you sure that's not Gene Simmons from KISS, on the right?

by Anonymousreply 77August 17, 2016 10:00 AM

Di was a strumpet. She went through more men than a hot Swedish girl doe sin a year! Her canonization was a farce. she had a good side to her character but it was muddled by her soap opera styled activities.

by Anonymousreply 78August 17, 2016 10:02 AM

You are a viper from hell, R78.

Diana was a saint and was beautiful beyond words. You must be British.

by Anonymousreply 79August 17, 2016 10:06 AM

Princess Di was a goddess.

Americans will always be her #1 fans.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80August 17, 2016 10:10 AM

I liked Di better with the blue eyeliner - always thought that was such a pretty and soft look on her.

by Anonymousreply 81August 17, 2016 10:11 AM

Why does Charles, who is 67, look 80?

by Anonymousreply 82August 17, 2016 10:14 AM

Love you, Princess Diana! I have all your plates!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 83August 17, 2016 10:24 AM

Gorgeous!!! She looked great in pastels.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 84August 17, 2016 10:26 AM

Diana was never 'gorgeous' .....she looked like our sister, whom we hate.

by Anonymousreply 85August 17, 2016 10:44 AM

Charles and Camilla both look like the bathe in gin. But that kept the old Queen Mother going till 99 or whatever she was. Camilla does need to put some supports under those saggy tits. Someone's going to trip over them.

by Anonymousreply 86August 17, 2016 10:52 AM

I still can't see how he could even get it up for the rott.

by Anonymousreply 87August 17, 2016 10:52 AM

Guess she never had a waist.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 88August 17, 2016 11:40 AM

Her upper lip looks like a bracket, like a }

by Anonymousreply 89August 17, 2016 11:43 AM

Charles may have a drinking problem.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 90August 17, 2016 12:12 PM

And to think this hag will be Queen one day.

by Anonymousreply 91August 17, 2016 12:41 PM

R91 Even worse, those Born to the Blood royals will have to defer and curtsey to the dried-up cunt.

by Anonymousreply 92August 17, 2016 12:44 PM

Her great-grandmother was a whore. What did you expect? Vivien Leigh?

by Anonymousreply 93August 17, 2016 12:47 PM

I remember an ENQUIRER headline that said that Di and JFK jr. were secretly dating.

by Anonymousreply 94August 17, 2016 12:57 PM

r94 And?

by Anonymousreply 95August 17, 2016 1:02 PM

R83 that is the tackiest thing I've seen in ages. Thanks!

by Anonymousreply 96August 17, 2016 1:13 PM

While I am certainly no fan of Camilla and think she is rather unattractive I do believe she she does well with what she has to work with.

by Anonymousreply 97August 17, 2016 1:18 PM

The article was all how they were madly in love and that Di was looking forward to being First Lady.

by Anonymousreply 98August 17, 2016 1:20 PM

Thanks for the numerous laughs I have had in this thread, DL, which brightened up an otherwise difficult day.

by Anonymousreply 99August 17, 2016 1:30 PM

Shut up, you grimy chavscum-bred deviants!

Camilla is classy as all fuck, and it's no surprise that she charmed Charles' flapping little ears.

She has that raw, primeval beauty that can only be appreciated by men who enjoy licking blue cheese off someone's feet, slurping on milky thrush, receiving heavy doses of penicillin from an English Rose's mouldy teeth and eating out beef drapes Wellington, ripened in their own juices and rubbed against a horse's sweaty hair.

Charles is a love gourmet, and a flavourless fish stick like Diana could never provide much pleasure for him. He likes to dine on strong country flavours enhanced by a good 4 or 5 bottles of brandy, a romp in shitty hay (just look at Camilla's hair, for God's sake!) and the tasty kisses of a sublime carrion flower who hasn't brushed her teeth in 40 years.

How could a bunch of turd-burglaring workhouse escapees like you ever appreciate these delectable feminine delights?

Look at this and marvel at its radiance, you grotty plebs!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 100August 17, 2016 3:48 PM

Because unlike you OP she has already managed to snag a wealthy man - the heir to the British throne no less. She doesn't need to look good

by Anonymousreply 101August 17, 2016 4:07 PM

Oh, but when she wraps those tits all the way around me... heaven...

by Anonymousreply 102August 17, 2016 4:18 PM

Charles is a selfish and spoiled man who was extremely jealous of Diana's popularity. He needed a plain looking house Frau wife who would mother and coddle him and walk three strides behind him. A woman who is not going to garner any attention and therefore be no competition for him. Hence, we get Camilla.

by Anonymousreply 103August 17, 2016 4:20 PM

Oh, bugger off all of you. My teeth are beautiful for a Brit. Rest assured I will have thrice-yearly cleaning of them when Charles is queen.

by Anonymousreply 104August 17, 2016 4:38 PM

[quote]How would it look for the King of England to have a half brother that is muslim?

We're fine with that.

by Anonymousreply 105August 17, 2016 4:56 PM

I believe Camilla gave up at birth.

by Anonymousreply 106August 17, 2016 5:01 PM

She looks like a bad imitation of Peggy Mitchell.

If Camilla says "get out my pub!" then we'll know for sure.

by Anonymousreply 107August 17, 2016 5:02 PM

Princess Diana would never have let William get involved with that tacky Kate. She would have nipped that in the bud straight away.

Fact.

Princess Di was a star in the firmament of heaven. Radiant!

And she had a great hat face.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 108August 17, 2016 7:32 PM

In person, Camilla is NOT a bad looking woman. She actually has a sort of down to earth charm. She photographs terribly. I never saw Diana in person, but I suspect the opposite was true for her. She took breathtaking pics that belied her probably average beauty.

by Anonymousreply 109August 17, 2016 7:46 PM

R109 I've seen Diana in person. She was even more beautiful. The first time I went to Britain was in 81, we flew out the day of her wedding. We weren't going for that, and missed it, as we flew out that morning, but anyway, she was stunning in person.

by Anonymousreply 110August 17, 2016 8:02 PM

Few people notice this, but Camilla has some exquisite clothes, jewels and hats. The detail, the workmanship and the costliness of the material of her suits and coats takes my breath away. But unfortunately, no one notices, because her face, hair and figure are so bad. She ruins the look of every single garment by her unsupported breasts. But if ever her clothes were displayed in a costume museum, people would be amazed.

by Anonymousreply 111August 17, 2016 8:23 PM

If you missed the wedding how did you manage to see Princess Diana "in person" r110?

by Anonymousreply 112August 17, 2016 8:27 PM

R112 she didn't drop off the face of the earth after saying I do. They made appearances all over Britain, and in fact, the world. What a silly question.

by Anonymousreply 113August 17, 2016 8:36 PM

R111 Amazed that you can smell the dirty right thru the display case.

by Anonymousreply 114August 17, 2016 8:40 PM

In the picture of Harry that R65 posted, he looks as if he could be a porn star..... If only

by Anonymousreply 115August 17, 2016 8:42 PM

Diana knew how to work the press and would have done well on social media. She would have been the social media queen instead of Kim Kardashian.

by Anonymousreply 116August 17, 2016 8:55 PM

I was just curious where you saw her r113. No need to be a jerk.

by Anonymousreply 117August 17, 2016 8:58 PM

R117 the question was asinine. The need was real.

by Anonymousreply 118August 17, 2016 9:02 PM

What is she supposed to look like? Is she supposed to look decades younger than her real age? She looks her age. And so what? She's not an actress or a model. She seems very comfortable in her own skin, which Diana never was. Maybe that's one reason she appealed to Charles; she's down to earth and confident. Diana, on the other hand, was a nut case. No wonder he dumped her for Camilla.

by Anonymousreply 119August 17, 2016 9:11 PM

For those you letting her off the hook because of her age, take a good look at the Princess Michael of Kent. As well as being beautiful, that woman (and her busband) are the epitome of style and elegance.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 120August 17, 2016 9:25 PM

The problem I have with Camilla has to do with her morals. She is an adulteress and a home wrecker. I know it takes 2 to tango and Charles is also to blame. Her blatant disregard for her own marriage and her willingness to be Charles's mistress does not exactly make her an ideal candidate for Queen in-waiting. Charles who has the intellect of a cabbage doesn't quite fit the bill either but there's not much can be done to prevent his ascension to the throne. Lee Harvey Oswald where are you now that we need you. As for Camilla's appearance - she is what she is. But I wish she would ditch those ugly hats that look like a helicopter has just landed on her head. And although I don't sound like a huge fan of hers, I think it would be a hoot to have dinner or drinks with her. I'm sure she could tell a tale or two.

by Anonymousreply 121August 17, 2016 10:33 PM

r109 here, I have had drinks with her and she is charming, interesting and La Jolie Laide! I do think the monarch is useless though...

by Anonymousreply 122August 17, 2016 11:25 PM

R111- I totally agree with you about Camilla. She can pull off wearing giant tiaras and fabulous diamonds. She also has a great collection of brooches that add a touch of whimsy to many of her outfits. Having said that, I still think her and Charles are a couple of assholes for the way they treated Diana.

by Anonymousreply 123August 17, 2016 11:35 PM

Not sure why I get the feeling that ole Camille would be super fun to party with.

by Anonymousreply 124August 17, 2016 11:47 PM

Diana was better than all the royals put together.

She was a modern princess and a saint. People loved her, and the inbred royal family hated that. For all they piss on the "commoners", not having their slavish devotion was more than they could handle.

The royals are so insecure, I'm baffled they they think they're fooling anyone.

by Anonymousreply 125August 17, 2016 11:47 PM

Why did OP post a pic of John Hurt in The Naked Civil Servant?

by Anonymousreply 126August 17, 2016 11:53 PM

I don't think we do agree, R123. Camilla ruins every outfit she puts on. The more beautiful the outfit or jewels, the bigger the contrast with her plain, weatherbeaten face and lumpy body.

by Anonymousreply 127August 17, 2016 11:56 PM

The royals really showed themselves to be incredibly tacky with how they couldn't handle Diana's fame.

If they were truly "above it all", they wouldn't have cared one bit.

That's when I knew they were big, tacky frauds who were incredibly common, and living on the taxpayers dole.

by Anonymousreply 128August 17, 2016 11:58 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 129August 18, 2016 12:02 AM

I've always thought Charles pinged.

by Anonymousreply 130August 18, 2016 12:05 AM

All British men ping.

by Anonymousreply 131August 18, 2016 12:07 AM

Dear God, I can't imagine even one of the Duggar Girls wearing this dress...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 132August 18, 2016 12:10 AM

I think her heyday was in the 70s with Charles, and it was a thing back then to go braless and/or sort of flaunt big, natural boobs. Men were into the long cleavage and the swing (seriously)

Like so many other olds, she never progressed beyond that and probably thinks it's still sexy to Charles.

Not even joking.

by Anonymousreply 133August 18, 2016 12:13 AM

Danger! Low curves...falling rocks...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 134August 18, 2016 12:16 AM

"She is an adulteress and a home wrecker. "

If Camilla had never existed, that home would still have been "wrecked." Diana was nuts. Charles eventually would have divorced her even if he'd never heard of Camilla Parker Bowles.

by Anonymousreply 135August 18, 2016 12:17 AM

She's British. It's called shabby genteel.

by Anonymousreply 136August 18, 2016 12:18 AM

Diana was a good person, but she was also fucking batshit and needy needy needy. She would've driven any man up the wall, not matter who she married.

by Anonymousreply 137August 18, 2016 12:18 AM

She was a cramp and a stamp and a bit of a clamp!

by Anonymousreply 138August 18, 2016 12:19 AM

"She was a modern princess and a saint.'

No, she was an anorexic, bulimic, self-mutilating, immature, paranoid slut who ended up dying a dirty death in a squalid car crash along with her oily, deadbeat playboy lover. She's been worm food for a long time now whereas Charles and Camilla are together and alive and kicking. I'd say they were the ones who ended up winning.

by Anonymousreply 139August 18, 2016 12:21 AM

Oh DataLouge, my arse....

As if I give a fuck what a bunch of Poofs think of me clothes?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 140August 18, 2016 12:21 AM

I do believe, I detect a knowing Sapphic glance between these two...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 141August 18, 2016 12:24 AM

[quote]William can go suck a big bag of dicks.

You say that like it's a bad thing.

by Anonymousreply 142August 18, 2016 12:25 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 143August 18, 2016 12:32 AM

Oh R 57, please fuck off and take your anti semitism with you. The Diana worship here is tedious.

by Anonymousreply 144August 18, 2016 12:33 AM

I don't get the feeling that Camilla and the Queen have a particularly warm relationship.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 145August 18, 2016 12:34 AM

Diana often used to bugger Charles with her enlarged clitoris.

Nowadays, alas, Charles must content himself with picking off the peroxide scabs from Camilla's cradle-capped scalp.

by Anonymousreply 146August 18, 2016 12:46 AM

And eat them, nonetheless, which is unheard of this time of year.

by Anonymousreply 147August 18, 2016 12:47 AM

[quote]While I am certainly no fan of Camilla and think she is rather unattractive I do believe she she does well with what she has to work with.

Oh yes, R97, I do love the way the Duchess uses the yellow and brown stains on her remaining teeth to compliment the brassiness of her wispy hair and draw attention away from her craggy Walter-Brennan like face, her tobacco-stained hands, and her sagging fleshy body.

She is one of the true beauties of our Time.

Thank you so much for your kind comments. Perhaps we may see you at Ascot.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 148August 18, 2016 12:54 AM

What was the reason why Charles and Camilla weren't allowed to get married in the 70s? I can't remember what made her unsuitable in the eyes of the Royal Family.

It's just as well, though. Can you imagine the gargoyle children those two would've had?

by Anonymousreply 149August 18, 2016 12:54 AM

What is it with you always trashing the royal family OP?

by Anonymousreply 150August 18, 2016 1:03 AM

And to think...

I was one of the few girls at my school who didn't dream of being a Princess...

All I ever wanted to be was an American Cowboy...

Fuck My Life...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 151August 18, 2016 1:03 AM

R111- (r127)- funnily enough, I have never noticed her saggy bosoms before this thread! I was always to busy looking at the jewels ---check out that tiara in r151 pic. Cammie needs some Spanxx!!

by Anonymousreply 152August 18, 2016 1:11 AM

Well, I for one think Camilla has beautiful perky breasts....

I'd just LOVE to Motorboat her bangin' titties...in my Pink Boudoir...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 153August 18, 2016 1:23 AM

Why does she still have 70's roller-skating rink hair?

by Anonymousreply 154August 18, 2016 1:30 AM

Diana didn't "steal" Charles. Mummy simply said no to the heir to the throne having a trashy whore like Camilla for a mother.

by Anonymousreply 155August 18, 2016 3:31 AM

[quote]Why does she still have 70's roller-skating rink hair?

As much as I hate to defend Camilla's dirty wispy mop of hair, I think she either has to do her own hair or go to Queen's hairdresser and end up with the blue-rinse 1950s set and curl style the Queen has favored for many decades.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 156August 18, 2016 3:36 AM

R149 She was [italic]experienced.[/italic]

by Anonymousreply 157August 18, 2016 3:43 AM

In fact I have in recent months taken up a newfound interest in the homo-sexual experience. Might I inquire as to how one goes about arranging a homo-sexual experience? Would "Royal Ginger" be an appropriate screen name?

by Anonymousreply 158August 18, 2016 5:24 AM

What became of the giant bird's nest Camilla stole from Africa and wore on her head the day she married Charles?

by Anonymousreply 159August 18, 2016 5:40 AM

My Mom thinks her name is Carmela Bowels.

by Anonymousreply 160August 18, 2016 5:41 AM

Although Charles & Camilla will eventually inherit the top titles, their "reign" will be a relatively short, cushy, and wealthy retirement for them. Will anyone really care how they look or hold up during the transition to the boring William & Kate? And by then, the monarchy itself will probably be little more than media interest in the fun & unencumbered Harry, the upstaging Pippa, and the dating woes of Fergie & her girls...

by Anonymousreply 161August 18, 2016 5:55 AM

Diana was insecure, manipulative and mentally ill. She may not be much to look at, but Camilla isn't batshit crazy.

by Anonymousreply 162August 18, 2016 6:01 AM

Diana was the loveliest woman ever.

My friends and I all adored her. She was too good for the trashy Brits.

by Anonymousreply 163August 18, 2016 6:35 AM

When Diana died I thought she'd become an icon like Marilyn, Elvis, James Dean etc but she didn't. The cult of Diana didn't happen and it seems, despite the hysteria her death caused, that people lost interest in her. Of course, there are some fans but they are few and far between and worship Diana as a dead royal they way there are still people, bless their hearts, who obsess over Marie of Romania or the murdered Queen of Serbia (Zita? Dagmar?) As for Camilla, yes she looks rough but her style (or more importantly) her lack of it , is appropriate to her role. Diana's Versace high fashion or the chic of the Duchess of Windsor is not appropriate for a royal as it distances them from the crowds who come to see them. Marie Antoinette was a fashion icon and look what happened to her! One of the Queen's first designers, Hardy Amies, said in the 1950s that "The Queen cannot be chic! The Queen must be seen as kind and a chic woman does not seem kind!" And before anyone else says it "Mary!"

by Anonymousreply 164August 18, 2016 6:53 AM

Sorry, R164 here again here's a Hardy Amies quote. He established the monarch's crisp, understated style of dress. "I don't think she feels clothes which are too chic are exactly very friendly," he told one fashion editor. "The Queen's attitude is that she must always dress for the occasion".

by Anonymousreply 165August 18, 2016 6:56 AM

I was watching the Alicia Silverstone film Excess Baggage when I heard that Princess Diana died.

by Anonymousreply 166August 18, 2016 7:21 AM

Except R164, no royal ever had less distance from the people than Diana. She blows that theory completely to hell.

by Anonymousreply 167August 18, 2016 1:09 PM

r164 I think the Royals deserve a Queen as ugly and unfashionable as Camilla. They haven't had one since Queen Victoria. It's about time.

by Anonymousreply 168August 18, 2016 1:19 PM

Magic!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 169August 18, 2016 1:35 PM

Middling and Meh!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 170August 18, 2016 1:36 PM

And yet, Charles respects Camilla, he didn't respect Diana.

by Anonymousreply 171August 18, 2016 1:46 PM

r171 More to the point, he's not jealous of Camilla. He was very jealous of Diana.

by Anonymousreply 172August 18, 2016 1:49 PM

Oh, I thought this thread was about Camilla Belle.

by Anonymousreply 173August 18, 2016 2:10 PM

Diana was very much a 90s icon. It was fashionable in the 90s to be a suffering rich and beautiful. She's like the Kurt Cobain of the royals. Still admired, but probably wasn't a joy to hang out with.

by Anonymousreply 174August 18, 2016 2:27 PM

The "Gruesome Twosome" are unfit to be King and Queen. Charles will be sitting on the throne and all I will be thinking about is his groaning to his mistress about how he wants to be her tampon. Ewww.

by Anonymousreply 175August 18, 2016 2:43 PM

In those leaked phone calls Camilla asked for a copy of a speech Charles had just given, she was excited about it. Camilla played up to and flattered Charles, maybe Diana did not have the wherewithal to do the same.

by Anonymousreply 176August 18, 2016 4:21 PM

R118 = Poo Shoes

by Anonymousreply 177August 18, 2016 4:41 PM

Long remember Diana, Princess of Wales.

by Anonymousreply 178August 18, 2016 5:11 PM

Yes, I remember her.

by Anonymousreply 179August 18, 2016 5:20 PM

Can't decide--horse or cow?

by Anonymousreply 180August 18, 2016 5:27 PM

Whichever gets you hard R180.

by Anonymousreply 181August 18, 2016 5:28 PM

I actually met Camilla once in Toronto in 2012 and she's actually better looking in person than she appears in pictures and on TV. She no stunning beauty but she looks younger in person.

by Anonymousreply 182August 18, 2016 5:49 PM

Although Camilla's clothes don't do her any favours, I bet they cost a bomb...... I wonder where the $$$ comes from that pays for them. Camilla doesn't hold the title of Royal Frump. That goes to Princess Ann who looks like the spitting image of one of her horses.

by Anonymousreply 183August 18, 2016 8:17 PM

Diana was gorgeous and so nice, classy too.

The rest of the royals are complete trash, and I include the queen. She showed her trite colors after Diana's death.

Fuck the lot of them, they're irrelevant and they know it.

by Anonymousreply 184August 18, 2016 8:35 PM

[quote]n fact I have in recent months taken up a newfound interest in the homo-sexual experience. Might I inquire as to how one goes about arranging a homo-sexual experience? Would "Royal Ginger" be an appropriate screen name?

Well, R158, before Harry got discovered on Facebook, he used the alias "Spike Wells".

So you might want to start hooking up with men who use that screen name and variations of that.

(But you may end up get banged by a few bikers before you find the Smokin' Hot Ginger Prince on Grinder.)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 185August 18, 2016 8:50 PM

I think even Michelle Obama was feeling Harry's sexy vibe...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 186August 18, 2016 8:54 PM

I like that Harry is not afraid to talk about how much he loved his mother and how he held in his grief for Diana for too long because he was afraid to talk about it...and afraid to upset Camilla.

Take that, you snaggled-tooth old Twat...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 187August 18, 2016 8:59 PM

This Harry face means, "I'm ready for sex and sometimes I like it rough."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 188August 18, 2016 9:03 PM

Do the Camilla Fraus believe Camilla has ever had carnal thoughts about her stepsons?

William before he went bald and now Harry she must pursue constantly...

"Oh Harry, could you help me unfasten my zipper?

Any woman who enjoys riding horses that much...she's got to be a freak in bed.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 189August 18, 2016 9:14 PM

Uh, the Diana obsession is beyond gross.

That girl was never beautiful and no one would claim she was, if she was an actress or singer. And her hair style was awful. She looks like an average girl at some grocery store check out counter, who would be flirted at no doubt by some custumers.

Camilla is also average in looks and an old lady now and married the future short term king of the UK for actual love. Start dealing.

by Anonymousreply 190August 18, 2016 9:49 PM

Does Charles ping? Are you nuts? As well as the usual courtiers to warm up the royal toilet seat in the morning and put toothpaste on his toothbrush, he has a full time footman for blowjob duties. He was outed some years back, look it up. He is a product of the British boarding school system.

by Anonymousreply 191August 18, 2016 10:17 PM

Diana was a beautiful hot slutty mess who chased men, made inappropriately seductive moves on them and wrecked marriages (or tried to). If she'd been less attractive and well-dressed she would have been as reviled as Fergie.

by Anonymousreply 192August 18, 2016 10:21 PM

r192, hi Camilla, Duchess of Cornhole, Cuntess of Chester!

by Anonymousreply 193August 18, 2016 11:54 PM

"When Diana died I thought she'd become an icon like Marilyn, Elvis, James Dean etc but she didn't. The cult of Diana didn't happen and it seems, despite the hysteria her death caused, that people lost interest in her."

That's because she never DID anything. She never accomplished anything. All she did was show up at parties and events where she was feted and fawned over, looking pretty in designer clothes and royal jewels. It's hard to make an icon out of nothing.

by Anonymousreply 194August 19, 2016 2:00 AM

You bitch, R194.

Diana was a beautiful, selfless angel who came to this earth to bless us for a few short years.

What about her work with AIDS patients and landmines?

She was a treasure and and a spectacular icon and always will be!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 195August 19, 2016 2:35 AM

"What about her work with AIDS patients and landmines?"

What "work?" She'd show up, shake a few hands or give somebody (usually a child) a cuddle, and go back to being a pampered Princess. She's no icon. If she's remembered at all, it's for being a royal mental case.

by Anonymousreply 196August 19, 2016 2:52 AM

Diana wasn't interesting. She wasn't witty or accomplished. She was pretty and blonde and wore pretty clothes to thrill the tabloids and their frau audience. If she had not died such a horrific death, she would have been the Queen of Eurotrashdom.

But the the Windsors are a pretty dull lot as well. Unlike his parents, Harry is the only interesting one who seems to have a brain in his head.

Justin Trudeau is more interesting and accomplished than any of them.

by Anonymousreply 197August 19, 2016 2:54 AM

So what, R196? She raised awareness. Just going to that AIDS hospital was a hell of a lot more than any other royals would do. It made headlines everywhere.

Diana was an amazing woman and she will always be an icon.

by Anonymousreply 198August 19, 2016 2:55 AM

I should have know it would be a tacky, bitter Canadian whining on this thread.

Fuck you.

Diana forever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 199August 19, 2016 2:55 AM

Canada deserves to have Camilla as its future queen.

by Anonymousreply 200August 19, 2016 3:06 AM

The week after Princess Diana's death Trump announced that he regretted he had never gotten around to dating her, making the assumption that she would have went out with him.

by Anonymousreply 201August 19, 2016 3:09 AM

Umm R45 'was' is past tense.

by Anonymousreply 202August 19, 2016 3:17 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 203August 19, 2016 4:18 AM

Tracey Ullman.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 204August 19, 2016 4:19 AM

R197 was making sense until she shoehorned in Justin Trudeau.

by Anonymousreply 205August 19, 2016 5:17 AM

I wonder if Justin tasted Harry's ginger manhood?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 206August 19, 2016 5:41 AM

Justin's mother Margaret was diagnosed as Bi-Polar, which probably puts Justin at a higher risk of developing that disorder himself...

I can only imagine how hot it would be to be with Justin during a hyper-sexual manic phase...

by Anonymousreply 207August 19, 2016 9:32 PM

Splendid! I simply utilised this Grindr feature on my phone, and within a few minutes had located 7 men - within my own building! I didn't even need to put my shoes on! This is simply marvelous - I shall hasten to tell Andrew and Edward about this. They shall thrill to it!

by Anonymousreply 208August 19, 2016 11:46 PM

Can't wait to hear about your adventures in Grindr-land, Royal Ginger! Be sure to keep us updated!

by Anonymousreply 209August 20, 2016 11:22 AM

While Camilla has never been a beauty, she's not as hideous as some people make her out to be.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 210August 20, 2016 5:31 PM

Is the UK the only country where the rules dictate that the prospective royal bride be of the correct religion (Protestant, ideally Church of England) and a virgin?

Other European royals don't seem to have a problem marrying commoners.

by Anonymousreply 211August 20, 2016 5:45 PM

r210 Still ugly and those teeth!

by Anonymousreply 212August 20, 2016 5:48 PM

Guess what they call Charles in Italy, R175...... 'Il Tamponcino' - Little Mr. Tampon.

by Anonymousreply 213August 20, 2016 5:49 PM

R211 the virgin thing isn't an explicit rule, it was just the done thing up until recently.

by Anonymousreply 214August 20, 2016 5:56 PM

Even when young, Camilla had some gnarly, jacked-ass teeth.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 215August 20, 2016 6:19 PM

She gives hope to every ugly little girl around the world: you too could grow up to be a Queen.

by Anonymousreply 216August 20, 2016 6:23 PM

Hillary is no prize, and she may soon be running your country.

by Anonymousreply 217August 20, 2016 6:42 PM

r217 Oh please, that's like comparing Hermione Baddeley with Eleanor Roosevelt.

by Anonymousreply 218August 20, 2016 6:50 PM

At least Camilla isn't falling down and convulsing.

by Anonymousreply 219August 20, 2016 6:52 PM

r219 Camilla's an alcoholic. How do you know how many times she's fallen down?

by Anonymousreply 220August 20, 2016 6:55 PM

There's a certain Saxe-Coburg look that's considered desirable in British females.--long-faced, thick-lipped, with smallish eyes and a big honker. It looks homely to us but to them it irresistibly suggests aristocratic ancestry. Benedict Cumberbatch's wife has it in spades.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 221August 20, 2016 7:02 PM

r221 I've heard it all now.

by Anonymousreply 222August 20, 2016 7:03 PM

I've been trying to imagine why Camille would put in the pain and effort to go the route of cosmetic surgery, cosmetic dentistry, facial fillers, marathon shopping and all of the other things DL seems to want from her.

Her husband would still be butt ugly. Her family either wouldn't care or they wouldn't like it. The English press would never get over it. Her life wouldn't be the tiniest bit better.

by Anonymousreply 223August 20, 2016 7:12 PM

Camilla looks like an 80s Dusty Springfield on a bender.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 224August 20, 2016 7:43 PM

[quote] What was the reason why Charles and Camilla weren't allowed to get married in the 70s? I can't remember what made her unsuitable in the eyes of the Royal Family.

1. She came from a trashy family. Her father was a liquor/wine salesman. And before anyone says it, there was a side of her family that was wealthy. She was not on that side of the family.

2. She was a gigantic whore when she was younger (before she married andrew parker bowles). Camilla Shand was always up for a shag

I love how William and Harry hate her and want nothing to do with Charles and Camilla. Just recently Harry gave an interview talking about how he wished he had talked more about his mother passing away and his grief when he was younger but he didn't feel it was right because it would have upset camilla. How disgusting is that? What a piece of shit father Charles is. His mistress's feelings mattered more to charles than his own son's feelings. It's hilarious how William and Kate keep the grandchildren away from charles and camilla. It bothered charles so much that he had a member of his staff complain to a tabloid about not seeing his grandchildren. William and Harry all live at Kensington Palace now and it seems like they mention Diana in all their recent interviews, especially Harry. William only makes the bare minimum of appearances with the Royal Family. I think he will become a private citizen when the Queen passes away

by Anonymousreply 225August 20, 2016 7:53 PM

It was obvious from the start that Diana was being married to Charles for breeding purposes only. Even back then it was shocking for someone so young to be marrying this old guy she obviously had nothing in common with and immediately start popping out babies. She did her job, he did his and they had no further use for each other. She did turn out to have added value as PR for the royal family at a time when they weren't very popular but that backfired when the press started paying attention to her and Charles' not very discreet amours. He was pretty much forced to dump her and marry Camilla just to put a respectable face on the situation a la Woody marrying Soon-Yi.

by Anonymousreply 226August 20, 2016 7:57 PM

With the slight difference that Charles and Camilla is a pretty much respectabe situation, while Woody Allen is obviously a complete sicko.

by Anonymousreply 227August 20, 2016 8:14 PM

r227 Nice try. Why don't you Brits give it up? A closet queer (Charles) married to his drunken fag hag.

by Anonymousreply 228August 20, 2016 8:18 PM

R221, is it called "Patrician?"

by Anonymousreply 229August 20, 2016 8:24 PM

So for William and Harry - they don't have a mother any more, and they don't have much of a father, either, so basically they're orphans.

by Anonymousreply 230August 20, 2016 8:26 PM

r228 Still not much wrong with that. Alcohol is unacceptable now? Do we have Sharia law? And Charles seems to be very much a bisexual, few gay men dream of being tampons.

I'm not a Brit, but they should absolutely have the last word on the Windsors, not pathetic American fanboys who always dreamed of being princesses.

by Anonymousreply 231August 20, 2016 8:27 PM

r229 That one is nuts r221. Don't pay any attention.

by Anonymousreply 232August 20, 2016 8:28 PM

r231 Honey, I was born a Queen. Suck my royal dick.

by Anonymousreply 233August 20, 2016 8:30 PM

R194 said "its hard to make an icon out of nothing"............... Someone should tell that to the Kardashians

by Anonymousreply 234August 20, 2016 8:33 PM

"I love how William and Harry hate her and want nothing to do with Charles and Camilla."

They actually get along perfectly fine with Charles & Camilla. William & Harry are adults, not vindictive fangirls.

by Anonymousreply 235August 20, 2016 8:39 PM

r235 Charles told them they had to. Camilla called Kate "trash", and poor William had grin and bare it.

by Anonymousreply 236August 20, 2016 8:43 PM

Did he tell you this down the pub, R236?

by Anonymousreply 237August 20, 2016 8:45 PM

r237 No honey, we're not a nation of drunks like you Brits. 'Down at the pub'. My cousin married a Brit and the deciding factor of her marital acceptance was based on the fact that she didn't want to end up like her family spending all their time at the local pub. She's no cockney; her father was a nuclear engineer.

by Anonymousreply 238August 20, 2016 8:53 PM

"Camilla called Kate "trash""

Camilla reads DL!

by Anonymousreply 239August 20, 2016 9:05 PM

Maybe Charles was bored and exasperated with Diana, who, despite her charm and beauty, was quite the drama queen, as well as being almost a generation younger, but it beggars belief that he stayed with Camilla. Surely he could have found someone more suitable and compatible and acceptable to the British public.

by Anonymousreply 240August 20, 2016 9:09 PM

r240 So he ended up with a ugly, hated hag like Camilla. And she's acceptable?

by Anonymousreply 241August 20, 2016 9:12 PM

[quote]I've been trying to imagine why Camille would put in the pain and effort to go the route of cosmetic surgery, cosmetic dentistry, facial fillers, marathon shopping and all of the other things DL seems to want from her.

Her husband would still be butt ugly. Her family either wouldn't care or they wouldn't like it. The English press would never get over it. Her life wouldn't be the tiniest bit better.

So you're saying that Camilla should just have another drink?

I think that's pretty much what she's decided too.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 242August 20, 2016 9:22 PM

I think Tracey Ullman has it just about right.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 243August 20, 2016 9:27 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 244August 20, 2016 9:42 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 245August 20, 2016 9:46 PM

Her 1980s hairdo cracks me up. Clearly she wants to be Krstal Carrington.

by Anonymousreply 246August 20, 2016 9:47 PM

She doesn't look any worse than Horsey Charles. It only matters that Phil shot his sperm into Lillibet.

by Anonymousreply 247August 20, 2016 10:17 PM

She's not much to look at, but neither is Charles - and his mother is frumpy and all men end up marrying their mothers. They seem happy together and it appears as if she gets along with Harry & William, though who knows what goes on behind clothes door. If Diana were alive, she'd be a post-menopausal nightmare for both of them.

by Anonymousreply 248August 20, 2016 10:39 PM

Diana, whatever....

I have my own exquisite personal sense of style that makes that little tart COMPLETELY forgettable...

When I take off my Wellies, I look quite extraordinary...and I'm drunk most of the time.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 249August 21, 2016 12:06 AM

Case in Point -

I manage to make this Couture dress look like a rag from the discount table at Old Navy with my banging tits and sagging...everything...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 250August 21, 2016 12:12 AM

But at least she's wearing stockings, R250.

by Anonymousreply 251August 21, 2016 12:16 AM

My father was a nuclear engineer!

by Anonymousreply 252August 21, 2016 12:19 AM

Is Charles able to become king now that he's been divorced and remarried to a divorcee?

by Anonymousreply 253August 21, 2016 12:28 AM

Oh for fuck's sake, woman.

Veneers.

Never mind the sagging skin, the jowls, the wrinkles. You can hide most of them under your clothes. But those fucking teeth! Everyone can see them, you know.

by Anonymousreply 254August 21, 2016 12:44 AM

What does the Queen think of Camilla? And does Camilla still smoke? I know she was practically a chain-smoker for years, but don't know if she's quit.

by Anonymousreply 255August 21, 2016 1:11 AM

I'd rather a night out with Camilla than Diana.

by Anonymousreply 256August 21, 2016 1:22 AM

Diana was the queen of my heart!

by Anonymousreply 257August 21, 2016 1:26 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 258August 21, 2016 2:23 AM

That is a tragic story, R258

by Anonymousreply 259August 21, 2016 3:26 AM

R211 - I know that was the case in the U.S. where I live (not including Las Vegas or Hollywood), a woman had to be the right religion and a virgin in order to walk down the aisle with their son and also to have a church wedding with the privilege of wearing the traditional white wedding gown. That has all since changed, but up until the late 70's that's how it was, at least in most parts of the U.S. Also, that was a time when most women married in their early 20's, so being a virgin wasn't all that difficult.

That's also when Brides finally got smart and removed the word 'obey' from the wedding vows, and "I now pronounce you Husband and Wife" replaced the former "I now pronounce you Man and Wife."

by Anonymousreply 260August 21, 2016 3:44 AM

Looks like Camilla made that frumpy dress in R249 from Miss Ellen's good curtains...

by Anonymousreply 261August 21, 2016 4:48 AM

When you get invited for a night out by the two, R256, by ALL means let Diana know you prefer to get drunk with Camilla...

by Anonymousreply 262August 21, 2016 4:52 AM

You know that fundamentalist family the Duggars - 19 and Counting - whose religion appears to be based completely on the oppression of women?

I don't think even one of those Duggar women would wear this dress.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 263August 21, 2016 6:59 PM

"I'm afraid I'm too drunk to stand at the moment. But you are a very attractive man and I should like to get to know you better if you would come to my hotel later."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 264August 21, 2016 7:03 PM

She always wears white or yellowish white or grayish white. Like cigarette ash.

by Anonymousreply 265August 21, 2016 7:11 PM

F.M.L.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 266August 21, 2016 7:31 PM

R100 Yes I agree. Diana was a hopeless and loveless tart. She was an utter bore.

by Anonymousreply 267August 21, 2016 7:32 PM

"Dear God, my royal flask is completely empty."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 268August 21, 2016 7:35 PM

Edina Monsoon + Patsy Stone = Camilla

by Anonymousreply 269August 21, 2016 7:46 PM

I didn't say it was tea in my cup...

Just mind your OWN fucking bloody business!

Who died and made you Queen? Well, whatever...you know what I mean...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 270August 21, 2016 8:06 PM

There's nothing to see here...

Everyone move along now.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 271August 21, 2016 8:10 PM

Why does Camilla look so tanned in some pictures? Like someone who spends a lot of time in the sun.

by Anonymousreply 272August 21, 2016 8:13 PM

Variations on an aging tart.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 273August 21, 2016 8:19 PM

I love this thread!

by Anonymousreply 274August 21, 2016 9:01 PM

I kinda love that Camilla doesn't give a fuck.

by Anonymousreply 275August 21, 2016 11:33 PM

"She came from a trashy family. Her father was a liquor/wine salesman. And before anyone says it, there was a side of her family that was wealthy. She was not on that side of the family."

Wait---a "salesperson."

by Anonymousreply 276August 23, 2016 1:05 AM

In England, plastic surgery is for WAGs and reality TV stars. Not for the seriously upper class and certainly not for Royalty. It would be considered undignified and common. Completely different mindset than the US and many other countries.

by Anonymousreply 277August 23, 2016 1:57 AM

As if Kate Middleton hasn't had a ton of plastic surgery?

by Anonymousreply 278August 23, 2016 4:34 AM

Exactly R279, the Royal Family chose and paid the French Orthodontist to fix Kate's teeth before the engagement was announced.

So STFU, R277, how much time do you spend in the Royal palaces?

by Anonymousreply 279August 23, 2016 8:57 PM

"So for William and Harry - they don't have a mother any more, and they don't have much of a father, either, so basically they're orphans."

"Orphans?' Do you think they're both still in elementary school? They're grown men; they don't need a mother to hold their hands or tuck them into bed. And as for Charles...well, by all accounts he is a good father. He was never overtly demonstrative like potty Diana, but he was a good father. Diana made concerted efforts to portray him as an uninterested parent, but that was just her manipulative effort to make him look bad. He's done well by his sons. And they LIKE Camilla. They're happy their father is with the right person for him.

by Anonymousreply 280August 27, 2016 1:10 AM

R280=Camilla

Sorry, but I can smell the horse shit, your horrendous body odor, and the stale cigarette smoke, dear...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 281August 27, 2016 1:29 AM

There it is, you ARE to BATHE completely before attending any event at which I am present!

I don't care if it's indoors or out - it IS WRITTEN in the Pre-Nup!

How many times must I point it out to you?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 282August 27, 2016 1:37 AM

R281 must be a fangurl of the rotting corpse that was once Diana, the half witted, slutty, potty Princess of Wales. Poor chap. Pathetic, that one.

by Anonymousreply 283August 27, 2016 2:23 AM

Well, she's no Diana, that's for sure!

by Anonymousreply 284August 27, 2016 2:29 AM

Quite the British accent you've affected there, R283...

Adds SO much to your credibility.

Well, hello Guv'ner!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 285August 27, 2016 2:58 AM

She's old and has osteoporosis. She makes the best of what she has body and face-wise.

The thing about most Royals is they are secure in their position in the social hierarchy and in life in general, so they don't feel the need to impress by how they look or dress.

Both the Queen and Princess Margaret had in their younger days stated with slight variations "I am not a film star. I don't have to look glamorous."

by Anonymousreply 286August 27, 2016 4:10 AM

Camilla's so secure in her Royal personhood she doesn't bother to wear a bra...

by Anonymousreply 287August 27, 2016 4:15 AM

'E's right, old R286...

I'm a Royal, you see, frough and frough...

Same reason I feels secure walking down to the Pub for a warm pint after dinner most ev'nings...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 288August 27, 2016 4:42 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 289August 27, 2016 4:53 AM

Camilla looks fine. More attractive overall than Princess Di who had a weird furtive expression.

by Anonymousreply 290August 27, 2016 5:11 AM

Oy! .All that money and she still looks like shit.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 291August 27, 2016 5:24 AM

I shudder to think what she would look like if she weren't rich.

by Anonymousreply 292August 27, 2016 5:32 AM

I think she looks fine.

by Anonymousreply 293August 27, 2016 5:37 AM

[quote]I think she looks fine for an old alcoholic woman with bad teeth who doesn't bathe properly.

There, I fixed it for you, R293.

by Anonymousreply 294August 27, 2016 12:26 PM

And if Charlie ain't too knackered...

Some nights he give me the Rumpy Pumpy before we goes to sleep...

Well, some nights it's after I'm snoring...trufh be told....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 295August 27, 2016 12:36 PM

'Ave I got time for just one fag?

I'm dying of a nicotine fit, Luvs.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 296August 27, 2016 1:21 PM

LOL this thread is so wrong. I love it.

by Anonymousreply 297August 27, 2016 1:51 PM

Camilla "gave up" in the 70's. It's all been downhill since then.

by Anonymousreply 298August 27, 2016 2:39 PM

I tries 'ard but after I've knocked back a few...

Well, me seams get a bit askew....

And it's ever so 'ard to get 'em straight again

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 299August 27, 2016 3:27 PM

Blah, blah, blah....

blah, blah, blah...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 300August 27, 2016 3:30 PM

Is any of this supposed to be funny? It's about as amusing as that "M" shit.

by Anonymousreply 301August 27, 2016 4:45 PM

She was also on the payroll of the multi-billion dollar global horror known as HIV/AID$ Inc.

As if she did not have enough money already?

by Anonymousreply 302August 27, 2016 5:42 PM

Remember how hot and heavy they were when they were hooking up behind Diana's back? I wonder how soon after they become legit did the sex dry up.

by Anonymousreply 303August 27, 2016 6:35 PM

No, R301, and we're all sorry we forced you to read it...ALL.

Now, go on with your busy, busy life in your Mommy's basement.

I think I smell a caftan that could use a good washing...

by Anonymousreply 304August 27, 2016 6:36 PM

Do you think she watches while Charles gets head from his male valet?

by Anonymousreply 305August 27, 2016 6:48 PM

Wow r304 you're just as unfunny as your stupid captions. And speaking of having no life, you really need to give it a rest. Searching out pics of Camilla all day and constantly posting them - retarded.

by Anonymousreply 306August 27, 2016 7:21 PM

r306 I would never stop looking at those pictures of that hag. I laugh every time I see a new one. Keep 'em coming r304.

by Anonymousreply 307August 27, 2016 7:47 PM

I think it's fucking hilarious.

Off-topic question---did mid-level service people (like butlers and chauffeurs and nannies) ever acquire posh accents in England, or was it that considered not knowing one's place?

by Anonymousreply 308August 27, 2016 8:50 PM

Our American royalty.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 309August 27, 2016 9:26 PM

I think Charles likes them rough looking (and smelling).

by Anonymousreply 310August 27, 2016 9:28 PM

But Camilla likes them young and nubile....

With a generous side of Gin and Tonic...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 311August 28, 2016 12:53 AM

Charles preferring weatherbeaten, unglamourous Camilla to the beautiful Diana, really, you couldn't make it up!

by Anonymousreply 312August 28, 2016 7:35 AM

Tee-hee!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 313August 28, 2016 8:37 AM

Camilla has had a face/neck lift, believe it or not. Check the neck and jaw line.

by Anonymousreply 314August 28, 2016 8:47 AM

Well, I s'pose I'll 'ave ONE more...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 316August 28, 2016 11:19 AM

What was the last thing going through her head before she died?

The radiator.

by Anonymousreply 317August 28, 2016 2:58 PM

I don't know, I think if she dropped some saddle padding, she'd clean up quite nicely.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 318August 28, 2016 3:10 PM

She'll never have your legs, Rose.

by Anonymousreply 319August 28, 2016 3:13 PM

I can't stand camilla, but don't be so harsh about her clothes. She's fat, frumpy and ugly. There is only so much she can do with herself. There aren't any clothes in the world that will make her look good. The best she can hope for is to be presentable. And with such a whiny, spoiled, jealous bitch for a husband she needs to be as low key and inconspicuous as possible

And I read somewhere that even though she looks like she just woke up and put on what ever was lying around on the floor of her bedroom, a lot of work actually goes into her making her look like this. She has a full staff of dressers, makeup artists and hair stylists and when she goes on tour she takes a staff of ten people to help dress her and make her presentable. I also think it's fucking hilarious that she used to make fun of Diana for worrying about her appearance, and here is Camilla spending her last years doing the same damned thing

by Anonymousreply 320August 28, 2016 5:28 PM

R320 I don't think anyone ever really believed Camilla looked down on Diana because of her love of fashion for intellectual reasons.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 321August 28, 2016 5:43 PM

R320, your fist paragraph is DL gold. Brava!

by Anonymousreply 322August 28, 2016 5:57 PM

Well then just imagine what she would look like if she weren't wealthy and with a full staff to help her get dressed. Or maybe not.

by Anonymousreply 323August 29, 2016 2:15 AM

She's a mess. Her parents should have named her Shit Happens.

by Anonymousreply 324August 29, 2016 2:20 AM

r315 You know you belong in a mental institution. Seriously, get some professional help.

by Anonymousreply 325August 29, 2016 12:46 PM

R315, those pictures have been proven to not be of Diana. Just some other unfortunate blond in a car accident.

by Anonymousreply 326August 29, 2016 2:35 PM

What does it matter? She's married to the right person and has the same rights whether she's a fashion maven or a frump. It's the monarchy, where you don't have to have a brain in your head.

by Anonymousreply 327August 29, 2016 2:49 PM

Fashion maven and lie-dee.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 328August 29, 2016 4:35 PM

R328 Oh, God, is that cash in her hand?! Was she actually counting cash at a public function? Did she bite any of the gold and silver gifts to ensure they were real?

by Anonymousreply 329August 29, 2016 4:40 PM

* SQUISH! *

SCREAM FRAUS SCREAM!!!!

by Anonymousreply 330August 29, 2016 6:24 PM

The darn thing must have been made of tin-foil!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 331August 29, 2016 6:26 PM

Bump

by Anonymousreply 332September 12, 2016 1:10 AM

Oh darlings, I gave up years ago, says Camilla sipping her straight Vodka.

What are the Royals going to do? Have me killed? Hahaha, snort, haha.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 333September 12, 2016 1:25 AM

She probably suits herself. It's not as if most of those around her care that much about fashion and all that bullshit. Leave that to bits of fluff like Kate and Diana,

by Anonymousreply 334September 12, 2016 1:48 AM

Say what you will - those Royal titties are going to swing free in the wind

Apparently even the Queen can't change that.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 335September 13, 2016 9:38 AM

Charles (Tampon) loves her no matter what she looks like.

by Anonymousreply 336September 19, 2016 6:33 PM

R336 Apparently so.

by Anonymousreply 337September 21, 2016 2:03 AM

Charles and Camilla's marriage is in name only now: she drinks and he sucks his personal assistants' and valets' dicks.

by Anonymousreply 338September 21, 2016 11:51 AM

Just melt her down and you'll reveal a lump of lead as cold as steel, there where a woman's heart should be.

Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, has no soul. There, I've said it.

by Anonymousreply 339September 21, 2016 2:24 PM

Sounds good to me, r339. She not only survived, she triumphed. There, I've said it.

by Anonymousreply 340September 21, 2016 3:24 PM

R340 She won the battle, but I guarantee you the bitch will lose the war.

by Anonymousreply 341September 21, 2016 3:28 PM

She's won the war, dear.

by Anonymousreply 342September 21, 2016 4:16 PM

r342 Not until she's Queen dear.

by Anonymousreply 343September 21, 2016 4:20 PM

She's just what the Kingdom needs - a Queen who looks and acts like a Talladega barfly.

by Anonymousreply 344September 21, 2016 4:30 PM

Let's all raise our glass to our patron saint!

by Anonymousreply 345September 21, 2016 4:34 PM

r342: She got exactly what she wanted, dear.

She has dowdy clothes, bad teeth and an absence of 'glamour', but she doesn't give a shit.

And she cares even less about the petulant squeals of her detractors.

by Anonymousreply 346September 21, 2016 4:57 PM

Is she definitely going to be Queen Consort? Is there any chance Charles will be passed over? They both seem so old, frail, misanthropic and musty. Wouldn't the Queen (and most UK citizens) prefer the more vibrant and relatable couple to be the face of the monarchy?

by Anonymousreply 347September 21, 2016 4:58 PM

That's quite likely. To close friends, Elizabeth has confided she can't bear the thought of Charles becoming Queen.

by Anonymousreply 348September 21, 2016 5:01 PM

R348, Gary Morton also cautioned Lucille Ball against accepting the role.

by Anonymousreply 349September 22, 2016 3:35 AM

I run race, climb hill, then poop!

by Anonymousreply 350September 22, 2016 9:16 PM

Evil Camilla, the perpetually horny step-monster, would love to get her claws on Harry.

"I would eat him - literally."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 351October 6, 2016 9:31 AM

Fifty Shades of Smoker's Gray

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 352October 6, 2016 9:33 AM

Is Charles a homosexual?

by Anonymousreply 353October 6, 2016 9:55 AM

Well, he's married to this ugly man - draw your own conclusions.

by Anonymousreply 354October 6, 2016 10:23 AM

Some random UFO just landed on her head that palace guards just let it happen?

by Anonymousreply 355October 6, 2016 10:28 AM

A UFO would be far more attractive...

And at least then Camilla would finally get probed.

by Anonymousreply 356October 6, 2016 2:32 PM

r347- r348: DianaFrau alert!

You girls can go back to fingering your cooter over Wills and Harry pics.

by Anonymousreply 357October 6, 2016 3:25 PM

I've been reading the book Game of Crowns (it's on the ebook3000 website) and in it Queen Elizabeth absolutely hates Camilla. In it, the Queen makes plans to abdicate when she turns 90 or when Prince Philip dies. It might have even happened earlier if Charles hadn't so royally screwed things with Diana. He almost brought down the whole monarchy. Even all these years later, things are kind of dicey. Scotland could still vote for independence. I still believe he will be king someday, but it won't be for long.

It may be mostly conjecture, but it's a pretty good read.

The Queen's best friend Margaret Rhodes died yesterday. Apparently it was quite sudden, but she was 91 so that can never be a huge surprise. I hope Elizabeth hangs in there for a good decade more, and never gives up the throne to Charles voluntarily.

by Anonymousreply 358November 27, 2016 2:34 AM

Oow... haha ..snort. I'm afraid I just shat myself haha. Well, maybe just one more G n T.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 359November 27, 2016 4:43 AM

Bump

by Anonymousreply 360April 30, 2019 12:15 AM

She has smoked and rank with abandon probably since she was about 15-16. She's 70 now. Of course she looks bad. She also is "outdoorsy" and never bothered to protect her skin.

by Anonymousreply 361April 30, 2019 12:45 AM

But can a woman who looks like Phyllis Diller actually become the Queen Consort?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 362April 30, 2019 2:12 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!