[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
Has Camilla Give Up Completely - How Does She Manage to Look So Bad?
by Anonymous | reply 362 | April 30, 2019 2:12 AM |
I think she looks pretty good and will make a great Queen.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | August 16, 2016 10:39 PM |
We'll just put some expensive haute couture on her - and no one will notice....
by Anonymous | reply 3 | August 16, 2016 10:39 PM |
I finks I've held up pretty good...all things considered!
by Anonymous | reply 4 | August 16, 2016 10:42 PM |
There's an old saying that goes something like, "...by age 50 you have the face you deserve."
by Anonymous | reply 5 | August 16, 2016 10:44 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 6 | August 16, 2016 10:48 PM |
Wait---she's 70, right? I think she just eschews plastic surgery.
Of course "it's getting worse!" Things aren't going to get better for the old girl as she gets older.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | August 16, 2016 10:49 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 8 | August 16, 2016 10:55 PM |
R6, she has the wasted thin limbs and bloated torso of an alcoholic in that picture. Sort of the way Judy Garland and Whitney Houston looked at the end.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | August 16, 2016 10:58 PM |
Do they have Dentistry in England?
by Anonymous | reply 10 | August 16, 2016 10:59 PM |
Poor dention is a British tradition. A requirement for empire and the reason they are leaving the EU.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | August 16, 2016 11:06 PM |
The other Royals have decent teeth. I think she's a heavy smoker and she just doesn't care.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | August 16, 2016 11:14 PM |
What about bras?
Apparently she's not into those either, judging from how low those breasts are hanging.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | August 16, 2016 11:20 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 14 | August 16, 2016 11:27 PM |
She looks the same as she ever did. She looked seventy when she was 45, and now she looks seventy at seventy.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | August 16, 2016 11:33 PM |
Umm, what will you look like when you're 70ish. Hmm. I really don't think she looks all that bad for her age. Back when she was my current age, 50 , I thought she looked bad. But no so much anymore.
Yeah, true her discolored yellow teeth are a bit jacked up and also add yrs to her life and could use some fixing for sure. But I've noticed that the Brits aren't particularly concerned with their teeth -- I await an 'Attack of the Brits' for saying that. But, hey, its true.
By the way R5 I just turned 50 and look great. Thanks for that post. Made my day.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | August 16, 2016 11:36 PM |
Mrs. Potato Head, R9 !
She just needs a chic sheath dress to show off her lanky plastic limbs while concealing her starchy, bulbous body.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | August 16, 2016 11:39 PM |
Camilla, spare us the sight of your sagging tits.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | August 16, 2016 11:40 PM |
Truth be told - the Windsors are actually very cheap.
There's never any decent food in that damn castle!
by Anonymous | reply 19 | August 16, 2016 11:40 PM |
She is a sporting Princess of Wales (whether she takes the title publicly or not) and will make a better queen than most of them. And if they try to suppress the title of queen consort, and Charles allows it, I hope she has him thrown into the Tower, declares an absolute monarchy a la Catherine the Great and releases photos of herself pegging Harry.
After all, it's not like she's the first alcoholic, chain-smoking, sneaky, haughty, homely, "fuck the proles and middle-class prisses who say 'fertilizer' instead of 'shit', slag-heap-bodied, lumpy, indiscreet and dry adulteress to take the throne. It's a British tradition. She's just the first to tick off all marks.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | August 16, 2016 11:42 PM |
Camilla's got kind of an "Ethel Kennedy" thing going on...
Maybe that's the looks she's going for.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | August 16, 2016 11:44 PM |
She has ALWAYS been disgusting. Poor Diana. At least he could have dumped Diana for a poodle rather than a Rottweiler.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | August 16, 2016 11:45 PM |
Wow, R20, that some "defense" of Camilla.
I can only imagine what you'd say if you hated her.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | August 16, 2016 11:46 PM |
Does she still smoke?
by Anonymous | reply 24 | August 16, 2016 11:49 PM |
I think I look better when I'm standing next to Anne.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | August 16, 2016 11:50 PM |
Well, I've been known to have a ciggy and drink on special occasions...
like Tuesday.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | August 16, 2016 11:52 PM |
She's the type of upper class mare that doesn't really give a fuck what she looks like. And that's the word she'd use, since she's well known for her blue language.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | August 16, 2016 11:54 PM |
[quote]After all, it's not like she's the first alcoholic, chain-smoking, sneaky, haughty, homely, "fuck the proles and middle-class prisses who say 'fertilizer' instead of 'shit', slag-heap-bodied, lumpy, indiscreet and dry adulteress to take the throne. It's a British tradition. She's just the first to tick off all marks.
You made me laugh out loud, R20.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | August 16, 2016 11:54 PM |
Anne has a man's hairline, R25.
Hideous, wiry hair, too.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | August 16, 2016 11:54 PM |
She was said in her youth to go horseback riding for hours, returning all sweaty, reeking of horse flesh, and change into her evening gown to entertain, without even touching soap and water...nasty old cunt.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | August 17, 2016 12:00 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 33 | August 17, 2016 12:02 AM |
She's no oil painting but she definitely doesn't look like a council estate resident. She's got typical posh horsey features.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | August 17, 2016 12:06 AM |
R33, OMG, she's aging like a serious alcoholic...
She looks so frail and stooped....
by Anonymous | reply 35 | August 17, 2016 12:08 AM |
Alcoholic, my dirty fanny!
So I enjoy a warm pint once in a while...go fuck yourself!
by Anonymous | reply 36 | August 17, 2016 12:11 AM |
I just can't see those two having sex.
And I think it's so terrible that the British have "God Save the Queen/King" as their national anthem. A national anthem is supposed to be uplifting to be about the people and the land, not crowing about how you wish a monarch will "long reign over us"
What a bunch of fucking peasants. Glad to be American and not involved with all that bootlicking.
Have some pride and self-respect, British!!
by Anonymous | reply 37 | August 17, 2016 12:17 AM |
I guess plastic surgery isn't a big thing over there like here in The States. She looks exactly the same since she came on the scene to me. Like shit.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | August 17, 2016 12:17 AM |
I think she looks fine in an English sort of a way.. Not like a plastic Housewife of Beverley Hills of course, which is what mature women are meant to look like - God forbid they look, you know, old-Ish. She is also chic. I hate fucking royalty btw, time they were given the heave, but I hate fucking misoginists more.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | August 17, 2016 12:20 AM |
R37 Yes, what a great system America has, where a man like Trump could well become President.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | August 17, 2016 12:21 AM |
She looks a thousand percent better than Diana does.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | August 17, 2016 12:23 AM |
"Charles, get me another Gin and Tonic - make a double!"
"Now who are these nice Pakis?"
by Anonymous | reply 42 | August 17, 2016 12:25 AM |
I thought you were talking about Camilla that Norwegian whore who works at that Italian joint in the village. She's more of a cunt than Camilla is!
by Anonymous | reply 43 | August 17, 2016 12:28 AM |
You shut your whore mouth, R41!
Diana was everything and outclassed the pathetic "royals" by miles.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | August 17, 2016 12:28 AM |
R44 Notice that r41 uses present tense rather than past tense...
by Anonymous | reply 45 | August 17, 2016 12:34 AM |
Obviously Charles and Camilla are soulmates, and I'm not being sarcastic. Diana was married off when she was a virgin and 20 SOLELY for the purpose of breeding. Once her job was over she was tossed aside. Camilla is the love of Charles life
by Anonymous | reply 46 | August 17, 2016 12:42 AM |
I have a flask in my purse...
Dear God, this country smells like a fucking garbage tip...
by Anonymous | reply 47 | August 17, 2016 12:43 AM |
Diana kind of got what she deserved for being a gold digger. Charles has never been attractive and was 20 years older than her. Diana should have married for love instead of money.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | August 17, 2016 12:44 AM |
I actually feel bad for Camilla. It's not her fault that the tart Diana stole her man and tried to push her out of the picture. She had Charles first
by Anonymous | reply 49 | August 17, 2016 12:46 AM |
Diana was the most beautiful, charismatic woman ever.
I just loved her and am still sad that she's gone.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | August 17, 2016 12:49 AM |
Someone should give her a mop and bucket. If she's going to shuffle around looking like a charwoman, the country might as well get some work out of her.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | August 17, 2016 12:51 AM |
This thread proves that DianaFraus are the Frauiest of Fraus.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | August 17, 2016 12:54 AM |
Diana, the queen of the people's hearts was murdered by that nasty royal family. When they realized that she was pregnant with a muslim baby they took her out. How would it look for the King of England to have a half brother that is muslim?
by Anonymous | reply 53 | August 17, 2016 12:57 AM |
Diana had star power - she was magnificent!!!!
Charles couldn't handle it because everyone loved her. Even her foibles were endearing.
Love you forever, Di!
by Anonymous | reply 54 | August 17, 2016 1:01 AM |
Ummm....Kate's grandparents are (were) Jewish. And Diana's great..great....great...great....etc grandmother was from India.
A Muslim baby would just have expanded an already expanded gene pool.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | August 17, 2016 1:01 AM |
[quote]She was said in her youth to go horseback riding for hours, returning all sweaty, reeking of horse flesh, and change into her evening gown to entertain, without even touching soap and water...nasty old cunt.
Oh that is just GROSS!
by Anonymous | reply 56 | August 17, 2016 1:02 AM |
Kate is very Jewish, you can just tell.
So vulgar and crass.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | August 17, 2016 1:02 AM |
[quote]This thread proves that DianaFraus are the Frauiest of Fraus.
Nothing comes close to the antiquated fraus who obsess over the Royals and who constantly spout the rules of the throne nonsense. One wonders what will happen when William takes over and that horseshit is done away with for good. I guess no more commemorative plate shopping for them.
To them, Diana was always too modern because she wore dresses that showed the ankle!
by Anonymous | reply 58 | August 17, 2016 1:11 AM |
Oh, please. She looks fine for her age. Only thing I'd fix is that dental issue.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | August 17, 2016 1:21 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 60 | August 17, 2016 2:02 AM |
R30 - LMAO!!!
by Anonymous | reply 61 | August 17, 2016 2:55 AM |
William is a tiresome bore. Harry is the interesting hot one.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | August 17, 2016 2:57 AM |
Barely recovered when I scrolled up and saw R21.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | August 17, 2016 2:57 AM |
Harry is one sexy fucker!
And she...well, she still looks as if she doesn't care for bathing...smelly old cunt.
by Anonymous | reply 64 | August 17, 2016 7:53 AM |
Now that you mention it, Harry just keeps getting sexier.
Shame about his smelly old step-monster.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | August 17, 2016 7:56 AM |
Harry is perfection and definitely has Diana's spirit.
Love them both!
William can go suck a big bag of dicks. Useless and OVAH.
by Anonymous | reply 66 | August 17, 2016 7:57 AM |
Diana was the pretty and depressed, Camilla seems like less attractive physically but a happy person.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | August 17, 2016 9:13 AM |
R50 Please Diana was Muslim clean asshole/cut cock chaser. Once she got a taste of that dark meat she couldn't stop. The Pakistani doctor she fell in love with had parents who told Diana she was not fit to marry him. Serves her right. especially for dating modelizer Dodi Fayed.
by Anonymous | reply 69 | August 17, 2016 9:27 AM |
Camilla had plastic surgery about a year before her wedding to Charles. She got it done in NYC
by Anonymous | reply 70 | August 17, 2016 9:30 AM |
Camilla looks like as if Jacqueline Bisset had an ugly demented sister that was put away in a mental institution.
by Anonymous | reply 71 | August 17, 2016 9:34 AM |
Diana was and will always be my Queen!!!
She was so photogenic - I still have a glossy book from the 80's my father brought back from England.
It's all soft-focus and 80's Sloane Ranger fashions - I treasure it.
by Anonymous | reply 72 | August 17, 2016 9:39 AM |
And all Americans loved Princess Di - men and women.
My father - who is the opposite of starstruck - still talks about the time he saw her outside a hotel.
by Anonymous | reply 73 | August 17, 2016 9:40 AM |
Diana 4 Ever!
by Anonymous | reply 75 | August 17, 2016 9:52 AM |
I was in high school, lifting weights in my garage (tacky, I know) when my mother told me Princess Diana had just died.
I cried for hours. It was horrible. I still can't believe she's gone.
by Anonymous | reply 76 | August 17, 2016 9:59 AM |
r25 Are you sure that's not Gene Simmons from KISS, on the right?
by Anonymous | reply 77 | August 17, 2016 10:00 AM |
Di was a strumpet. She went through more men than a hot Swedish girl doe sin a year! Her canonization was a farce. she had a good side to her character but it was muddled by her soap opera styled activities.
by Anonymous | reply 78 | August 17, 2016 10:02 AM |
You are a viper from hell, R78.
Diana was a saint and was beautiful beyond words. You must be British.
by Anonymous | reply 79 | August 17, 2016 10:06 AM |
Princess Di was a goddess.
Americans will always be her #1 fans.
by Anonymous | reply 80 | August 17, 2016 10:10 AM |
I liked Di better with the blue eyeliner - always thought that was such a pretty and soft look on her.
by Anonymous | reply 81 | August 17, 2016 10:11 AM |
Why does Charles, who is 67, look 80?
by Anonymous | reply 82 | August 17, 2016 10:14 AM |
Love you, Princess Diana! I have all your plates!
by Anonymous | reply 83 | August 17, 2016 10:24 AM |
Diana was never 'gorgeous' .....she looked like our sister, whom we hate.
by Anonymous | reply 85 | August 17, 2016 10:44 AM |
Charles and Camilla both look like the bathe in gin. But that kept the old Queen Mother going till 99 or whatever she was. Camilla does need to put some supports under those saggy tits. Someone's going to trip over them.
by Anonymous | reply 86 | August 17, 2016 10:52 AM |
I still can't see how he could even get it up for the rott.
by Anonymous | reply 87 | August 17, 2016 10:52 AM |
Her upper lip looks like a bracket, like a }
by Anonymous | reply 89 | August 17, 2016 11:43 AM |
And to think this hag will be Queen one day.
by Anonymous | reply 91 | August 17, 2016 12:41 PM |
R91 Even worse, those Born to the Blood royals will have to defer and curtsey to the dried-up cunt.
by Anonymous | reply 92 | August 17, 2016 12:44 PM |
Her great-grandmother was a whore. What did you expect? Vivien Leigh?
by Anonymous | reply 93 | August 17, 2016 12:47 PM |
I remember an ENQUIRER headline that said that Di and JFK jr. were secretly dating.
by Anonymous | reply 94 | August 17, 2016 12:57 PM |
r94 And?
by Anonymous | reply 95 | August 17, 2016 1:02 PM |
R83 that is the tackiest thing I've seen in ages. Thanks!
by Anonymous | reply 96 | August 17, 2016 1:13 PM |
While I am certainly no fan of Camilla and think she is rather unattractive I do believe she she does well with what she has to work with.
by Anonymous | reply 97 | August 17, 2016 1:18 PM |
The article was all how they were madly in love and that Di was looking forward to being First Lady.
by Anonymous | reply 98 | August 17, 2016 1:20 PM |
Thanks for the numerous laughs I have had in this thread, DL, which brightened up an otherwise difficult day.
by Anonymous | reply 99 | August 17, 2016 1:30 PM |
Shut up, you grimy chavscum-bred deviants!
Camilla is classy as all fuck, and it's no surprise that she charmed Charles' flapping little ears.
She has that raw, primeval beauty that can only be appreciated by men who enjoy licking blue cheese off someone's feet, slurping on milky thrush, receiving heavy doses of penicillin from an English Rose's mouldy teeth and eating out beef drapes Wellington, ripened in their own juices and rubbed against a horse's sweaty hair.
Charles is a love gourmet, and a flavourless fish stick like Diana could never provide much pleasure for him. He likes to dine on strong country flavours enhanced by a good 4 or 5 bottles of brandy, a romp in shitty hay (just look at Camilla's hair, for God's sake!) and the tasty kisses of a sublime carrion flower who hasn't brushed her teeth in 40 years.
How could a bunch of turd-burglaring workhouse escapees like you ever appreciate these delectable feminine delights?
Look at this and marvel at its radiance, you grotty plebs!
by Anonymous | reply 100 | August 17, 2016 3:48 PM |
Because unlike you OP she has already managed to snag a wealthy man - the heir to the British throne no less. She doesn't need to look good
by Anonymous | reply 101 | August 17, 2016 4:07 PM |
Oh, but when she wraps those tits all the way around me... heaven...
by Anonymous | reply 102 | August 17, 2016 4:18 PM |
Charles is a selfish and spoiled man who was extremely jealous of Diana's popularity. He needed a plain looking house Frau wife who would mother and coddle him and walk three strides behind him. A woman who is not going to garner any attention and therefore be no competition for him. Hence, we get Camilla.
by Anonymous | reply 103 | August 17, 2016 4:20 PM |
Oh, bugger off all of you. My teeth are beautiful for a Brit. Rest assured I will have thrice-yearly cleaning of them when Charles is queen.
by Anonymous | reply 104 | August 17, 2016 4:38 PM |
[quote]How would it look for the King of England to have a half brother that is muslim?
We're fine with that.
by Anonymous | reply 105 | August 17, 2016 4:56 PM |
I believe Camilla gave up at birth.
by Anonymous | reply 106 | August 17, 2016 5:01 PM |
She looks like a bad imitation of Peggy Mitchell.
If Camilla says "get out my pub!" then we'll know for sure.
by Anonymous | reply 107 | August 17, 2016 5:02 PM |
Princess Diana would never have let William get involved with that tacky Kate. She would have nipped that in the bud straight away.
Fact.
Princess Di was a star in the firmament of heaven. Radiant!
And she had a great hat face.
by Anonymous | reply 108 | August 17, 2016 7:32 PM |
In person, Camilla is NOT a bad looking woman. She actually has a sort of down to earth charm. She photographs terribly. I never saw Diana in person, but I suspect the opposite was true for her. She took breathtaking pics that belied her probably average beauty.
by Anonymous | reply 109 | August 17, 2016 7:46 PM |
R109 I've seen Diana in person. She was even more beautiful. The first time I went to Britain was in 81, we flew out the day of her wedding. We weren't going for that, and missed it, as we flew out that morning, but anyway, she was stunning in person.
by Anonymous | reply 110 | August 17, 2016 8:02 PM |
Few people notice this, but Camilla has some exquisite clothes, jewels and hats. The detail, the workmanship and the costliness of the material of her suits and coats takes my breath away. But unfortunately, no one notices, because her face, hair and figure are so bad. She ruins the look of every single garment by her unsupported breasts. But if ever her clothes were displayed in a costume museum, people would be amazed.
by Anonymous | reply 111 | August 17, 2016 8:23 PM |
If you missed the wedding how did you manage to see Princess Diana "in person" r110?
by Anonymous | reply 112 | August 17, 2016 8:27 PM |
R112 she didn't drop off the face of the earth after saying I do. They made appearances all over Britain, and in fact, the world. What a silly question.
by Anonymous | reply 113 | August 17, 2016 8:36 PM |
R111 Amazed that you can smell the dirty right thru the display case.
by Anonymous | reply 114 | August 17, 2016 8:40 PM |
In the picture of Harry that R65 posted, he looks as if he could be a porn star..... If only
by Anonymous | reply 115 | August 17, 2016 8:42 PM |
Diana knew how to work the press and would have done well on social media. She would have been the social media queen instead of Kim Kardashian.
by Anonymous | reply 116 | August 17, 2016 8:55 PM |
I was just curious where you saw her r113. No need to be a jerk.
by Anonymous | reply 117 | August 17, 2016 8:58 PM |
R117 the question was asinine. The need was real.
by Anonymous | reply 118 | August 17, 2016 9:02 PM |
What is she supposed to look like? Is she supposed to look decades younger than her real age? She looks her age. And so what? She's not an actress or a model. She seems very comfortable in her own skin, which Diana never was. Maybe that's one reason she appealed to Charles; she's down to earth and confident. Diana, on the other hand, was a nut case. No wonder he dumped her for Camilla.
by Anonymous | reply 119 | August 17, 2016 9:11 PM |
For those you letting her off the hook because of her age, take a good look at the Princess Michael of Kent. As well as being beautiful, that woman (and her busband) are the epitome of style and elegance.
by Anonymous | reply 120 | August 17, 2016 9:25 PM |
The problem I have with Camilla has to do with her morals. She is an adulteress and a home wrecker. I know it takes 2 to tango and Charles is also to blame. Her blatant disregard for her own marriage and her willingness to be Charles's mistress does not exactly make her an ideal candidate for Queen in-waiting. Charles who has the intellect of a cabbage doesn't quite fit the bill either but there's not much can be done to prevent his ascension to the throne. Lee Harvey Oswald where are you now that we need you. As for Camilla's appearance - she is what she is. But I wish she would ditch those ugly hats that look like a helicopter has just landed on her head. And although I don't sound like a huge fan of hers, I think it would be a hoot to have dinner or drinks with her. I'm sure she could tell a tale or two.
by Anonymous | reply 121 | August 17, 2016 10:33 PM |
r109 here, I have had drinks with her and she is charming, interesting and La Jolie Laide! I do think the monarch is useless though...
by Anonymous | reply 122 | August 17, 2016 11:25 PM |
R111- I totally agree with you about Camilla. She can pull off wearing giant tiaras and fabulous diamonds. She also has a great collection of brooches that add a touch of whimsy to many of her outfits. Having said that, I still think her and Charles are a couple of assholes for the way they treated Diana.
by Anonymous | reply 123 | August 17, 2016 11:35 PM |
Not sure why I get the feeling that ole Camille would be super fun to party with.
by Anonymous | reply 124 | August 17, 2016 11:47 PM |
Diana was better than all the royals put together.
She was a modern princess and a saint. People loved her, and the inbred royal family hated that. For all they piss on the "commoners", not having their slavish devotion was more than they could handle.
The royals are so insecure, I'm baffled they they think they're fooling anyone.
by Anonymous | reply 125 | August 17, 2016 11:47 PM |
Why did OP post a pic of John Hurt in The Naked Civil Servant?
by Anonymous | reply 126 | August 17, 2016 11:53 PM |
I don't think we do agree, R123. Camilla ruins every outfit she puts on. The more beautiful the outfit or jewels, the bigger the contrast with her plain, weatherbeaten face and lumpy body.
by Anonymous | reply 127 | August 17, 2016 11:56 PM |
The royals really showed themselves to be incredibly tacky with how they couldn't handle Diana's fame.
If they were truly "above it all", they wouldn't have cared one bit.
That's when I knew they were big, tacky frauds who were incredibly common, and living on the taxpayers dole.
by Anonymous | reply 128 | August 17, 2016 11:58 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 129 | August 18, 2016 12:02 AM |
I've always thought Charles pinged.
by Anonymous | reply 130 | August 18, 2016 12:05 AM |
All British men ping.
by Anonymous | reply 131 | August 18, 2016 12:07 AM |
Dear God, I can't imagine even one of the Duggar Girls wearing this dress...
by Anonymous | reply 132 | August 18, 2016 12:10 AM |
I think her heyday was in the 70s with Charles, and it was a thing back then to go braless and/or sort of flaunt big, natural boobs. Men were into the long cleavage and the swing (seriously)
Like so many other olds, she never progressed beyond that and probably thinks it's still sexy to Charles.
Not even joking.
by Anonymous | reply 133 | August 18, 2016 12:13 AM |
"She is an adulteress and a home wrecker. "
If Camilla had never existed, that home would still have been "wrecked." Diana was nuts. Charles eventually would have divorced her even if he'd never heard of Camilla Parker Bowles.
by Anonymous | reply 135 | August 18, 2016 12:17 AM |
She's British. It's called shabby genteel.
by Anonymous | reply 136 | August 18, 2016 12:18 AM |
Diana was a good person, but she was also fucking batshit and needy needy needy. She would've driven any man up the wall, not matter who she married.
by Anonymous | reply 137 | August 18, 2016 12:18 AM |
She was a cramp and a stamp and a bit of a clamp!
by Anonymous | reply 138 | August 18, 2016 12:19 AM |
"She was a modern princess and a saint.'
No, she was an anorexic, bulimic, self-mutilating, immature, paranoid slut who ended up dying a dirty death in a squalid car crash along with her oily, deadbeat playboy lover. She's been worm food for a long time now whereas Charles and Camilla are together and alive and kicking. I'd say they were the ones who ended up winning.
by Anonymous | reply 139 | August 18, 2016 12:21 AM |
Oh DataLouge, my arse....
As if I give a fuck what a bunch of Poofs think of me clothes?
by Anonymous | reply 140 | August 18, 2016 12:21 AM |
I do believe, I detect a knowing Sapphic glance between these two...
by Anonymous | reply 141 | August 18, 2016 12:24 AM |
[quote]William can go suck a big bag of dicks.
You say that like it's a bad thing.
by Anonymous | reply 142 | August 18, 2016 12:25 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 143 | August 18, 2016 12:32 AM |
Oh R 57, please fuck off and take your anti semitism with you. The Diana worship here is tedious.
by Anonymous | reply 144 | August 18, 2016 12:33 AM |
I don't get the feeling that Camilla and the Queen have a particularly warm relationship.
by Anonymous | reply 145 | August 18, 2016 12:34 AM |
Diana often used to bugger Charles with her enlarged clitoris.
Nowadays, alas, Charles must content himself with picking off the peroxide scabs from Camilla's cradle-capped scalp.
by Anonymous | reply 146 | August 18, 2016 12:46 AM |
And eat them, nonetheless, which is unheard of this time of year.
by Anonymous | reply 147 | August 18, 2016 12:47 AM |
[quote]While I am certainly no fan of Camilla and think she is rather unattractive I do believe she she does well with what she has to work with.
Oh yes, R97, I do love the way the Duchess uses the yellow and brown stains on her remaining teeth to compliment the brassiness of her wispy hair and draw attention away from her craggy Walter-Brennan like face, her tobacco-stained hands, and her sagging fleshy body.
She is one of the true beauties of our Time.
Thank you so much for your kind comments. Perhaps we may see you at Ascot.
by Anonymous | reply 148 | August 18, 2016 12:54 AM |
What was the reason why Charles and Camilla weren't allowed to get married in the 70s? I can't remember what made her unsuitable in the eyes of the Royal Family.
It's just as well, though. Can you imagine the gargoyle children those two would've had?
by Anonymous | reply 149 | August 18, 2016 12:54 AM |
What is it with you always trashing the royal family OP?
by Anonymous | reply 150 | August 18, 2016 1:03 AM |
And to think...
I was one of the few girls at my school who didn't dream of being a Princess...
All I ever wanted to be was an American Cowboy...
Fuck My Life...
by Anonymous | reply 151 | August 18, 2016 1:03 AM |
R111- (r127)- funnily enough, I have never noticed her saggy bosoms before this thread! I was always to busy looking at the jewels ---check out that tiara in r151 pic. Cammie needs some Spanxx!!
by Anonymous | reply 152 | August 18, 2016 1:11 AM |
Well, I for one think Camilla has beautiful perky breasts....
I'd just LOVE to Motorboat her bangin' titties...in my Pink Boudoir...
by Anonymous | reply 153 | August 18, 2016 1:23 AM |
Why does she still have 70's roller-skating rink hair?
by Anonymous | reply 154 | August 18, 2016 1:30 AM |
Diana didn't "steal" Charles. Mummy simply said no to the heir to the throne having a trashy whore like Camilla for a mother.
by Anonymous | reply 155 | August 18, 2016 3:31 AM |
[quote]Why does she still have 70's roller-skating rink hair?
As much as I hate to defend Camilla's dirty wispy mop of hair, I think she either has to do her own hair or go to Queen's hairdresser and end up with the blue-rinse 1950s set and curl style the Queen has favored for many decades.
by Anonymous | reply 156 | August 18, 2016 3:36 AM |
R149 She was [italic]experienced.[/italic]
by Anonymous | reply 157 | August 18, 2016 3:43 AM |
In fact I have in recent months taken up a newfound interest in the homo-sexual experience. Might I inquire as to how one goes about arranging a homo-sexual experience? Would "Royal Ginger" be an appropriate screen name?
by Anonymous | reply 158 | August 18, 2016 5:24 AM |
What became of the giant bird's nest Camilla stole from Africa and wore on her head the day she married Charles?
by Anonymous | reply 159 | August 18, 2016 5:40 AM |
My Mom thinks her name is Carmela Bowels.
by Anonymous | reply 160 | August 18, 2016 5:41 AM |
Although Charles & Camilla will eventually inherit the top titles, their "reign" will be a relatively short, cushy, and wealthy retirement for them. Will anyone really care how they look or hold up during the transition to the boring William & Kate? And by then, the monarchy itself will probably be little more than media interest in the fun & unencumbered Harry, the upstaging Pippa, and the dating woes of Fergie & her girls...
by Anonymous | reply 161 | August 18, 2016 5:55 AM |
Diana was insecure, manipulative and mentally ill. She may not be much to look at, but Camilla isn't batshit crazy.
by Anonymous | reply 162 | August 18, 2016 6:01 AM |
Diana was the loveliest woman ever.
My friends and I all adored her. She was too good for the trashy Brits.
by Anonymous | reply 163 | August 18, 2016 6:35 AM |
When Diana died I thought she'd become an icon like Marilyn, Elvis, James Dean etc but she didn't. The cult of Diana didn't happen and it seems, despite the hysteria her death caused, that people lost interest in her. Of course, there are some fans but they are few and far between and worship Diana as a dead royal they way there are still people, bless their hearts, who obsess over Marie of Romania or the murdered Queen of Serbia (Zita? Dagmar?) As for Camilla, yes she looks rough but her style (or more importantly) her lack of it , is appropriate to her role. Diana's Versace high fashion or the chic of the Duchess of Windsor is not appropriate for a royal as it distances them from the crowds who come to see them. Marie Antoinette was a fashion icon and look what happened to her! One of the Queen's first designers, Hardy Amies, said in the 1950s that "The Queen cannot be chic! The Queen must be seen as kind and a chic woman does not seem kind!" And before anyone else says it "Mary!"
by Anonymous | reply 164 | August 18, 2016 6:53 AM |
Sorry, R164 here again here's a Hardy Amies quote. He established the monarch's crisp, understated style of dress. "I don't think she feels clothes which are too chic are exactly very friendly," he told one fashion editor. "The Queen's attitude is that she must always dress for the occasion".
by Anonymous | reply 165 | August 18, 2016 6:56 AM |
I was watching the Alicia Silverstone film Excess Baggage when I heard that Princess Diana died.
by Anonymous | reply 166 | August 18, 2016 7:21 AM |
Except R164, no royal ever had less distance from the people than Diana. She blows that theory completely to hell.
by Anonymous | reply 167 | August 18, 2016 1:09 PM |
r164 I think the Royals deserve a Queen as ugly and unfashionable as Camilla. They haven't had one since Queen Victoria. It's about time.
by Anonymous | reply 168 | August 18, 2016 1:19 PM |
And yet, Charles respects Camilla, he didn't respect Diana.
by Anonymous | reply 171 | August 18, 2016 1:46 PM |
r171 More to the point, he's not jealous of Camilla. He was very jealous of Diana.
by Anonymous | reply 172 | August 18, 2016 1:49 PM |
Oh, I thought this thread was about Camilla Belle.
by Anonymous | reply 173 | August 18, 2016 2:10 PM |
Diana was very much a 90s icon. It was fashionable in the 90s to be a suffering rich and beautiful. She's like the Kurt Cobain of the royals. Still admired, but probably wasn't a joy to hang out with.
by Anonymous | reply 174 | August 18, 2016 2:27 PM |
The "Gruesome Twosome" are unfit to be King and Queen. Charles will be sitting on the throne and all I will be thinking about is his groaning to his mistress about how he wants to be her tampon. Ewww.
by Anonymous | reply 175 | August 18, 2016 2:43 PM |
In those leaked phone calls Camilla asked for a copy of a speech Charles had just given, she was excited about it. Camilla played up to and flattered Charles, maybe Diana did not have the wherewithal to do the same.
by Anonymous | reply 176 | August 18, 2016 4:21 PM |
R118 = Poo Shoes
by Anonymous | reply 177 | August 18, 2016 4:41 PM |
Long remember Diana, Princess of Wales.
by Anonymous | reply 178 | August 18, 2016 5:11 PM |
Yes, I remember her.
by Anonymous | reply 179 | August 18, 2016 5:20 PM |
Can't decide--horse or cow?
by Anonymous | reply 180 | August 18, 2016 5:27 PM |
Whichever gets you hard R180.
by Anonymous | reply 181 | August 18, 2016 5:28 PM |
I actually met Camilla once in Toronto in 2012 and she's actually better looking in person than she appears in pictures and on TV. She no stunning beauty but she looks younger in person.
by Anonymous | reply 182 | August 18, 2016 5:49 PM |
Although Camilla's clothes don't do her any favours, I bet they cost a bomb...... I wonder where the $$$ comes from that pays for them. Camilla doesn't hold the title of Royal Frump. That goes to Princess Ann who looks like the spitting image of one of her horses.
by Anonymous | reply 183 | August 18, 2016 8:17 PM |
Diana was gorgeous and so nice, classy too.
The rest of the royals are complete trash, and I include the queen. She showed her trite colors after Diana's death.
Fuck the lot of them, they're irrelevant and they know it.
by Anonymous | reply 184 | August 18, 2016 8:35 PM |
[quote]n fact I have in recent months taken up a newfound interest in the homo-sexual experience. Might I inquire as to how one goes about arranging a homo-sexual experience? Would "Royal Ginger" be an appropriate screen name?
Well, R158, before Harry got discovered on Facebook, he used the alias "Spike Wells".
So you might want to start hooking up with men who use that screen name and variations of that.
(But you may end up get banged by a few bikers before you find the Smokin' Hot Ginger Prince on Grinder.)
by Anonymous | reply 185 | August 18, 2016 8:50 PM |
I think even Michelle Obama was feeling Harry's sexy vibe...
by Anonymous | reply 186 | August 18, 2016 8:54 PM |
I like that Harry is not afraid to talk about how much he loved his mother and how he held in his grief for Diana for too long because he was afraid to talk about it...and afraid to upset Camilla.
Take that, you snaggled-tooth old Twat...
by Anonymous | reply 187 | August 18, 2016 8:59 PM |
This Harry face means, "I'm ready for sex and sometimes I like it rough."
by Anonymous | reply 188 | August 18, 2016 9:03 PM |
Do the Camilla Fraus believe Camilla has ever had carnal thoughts about her stepsons?
William before he went bald and now Harry she must pursue constantly...
"Oh Harry, could you help me unfasten my zipper?
Any woman who enjoys riding horses that much...she's got to be a freak in bed.
by Anonymous | reply 189 | August 18, 2016 9:14 PM |
Uh, the Diana obsession is beyond gross.
That girl was never beautiful and no one would claim she was, if she was an actress or singer. And her hair style was awful. She looks like an average girl at some grocery store check out counter, who would be flirted at no doubt by some custumers.
Camilla is also average in looks and an old lady now and married the future short term king of the UK for actual love. Start dealing.
by Anonymous | reply 190 | August 18, 2016 9:49 PM |
Does Charles ping? Are you nuts? As well as the usual courtiers to warm up the royal toilet seat in the morning and put toothpaste on his toothbrush, he has a full time footman for blowjob duties. He was outed some years back, look it up. He is a product of the British boarding school system.
by Anonymous | reply 191 | August 18, 2016 10:17 PM |
Diana was a beautiful hot slutty mess who chased men, made inappropriately seductive moves on them and wrecked marriages (or tried to). If she'd been less attractive and well-dressed she would have been as reviled as Fergie.
by Anonymous | reply 192 | August 18, 2016 10:21 PM |
r192, hi Camilla, Duchess of Cornhole, Cuntess of Chester!
by Anonymous | reply 193 | August 18, 2016 11:54 PM |
"When Diana died I thought she'd become an icon like Marilyn, Elvis, James Dean etc but she didn't. The cult of Diana didn't happen and it seems, despite the hysteria her death caused, that people lost interest in her."
That's because she never DID anything. She never accomplished anything. All she did was show up at parties and events where she was feted and fawned over, looking pretty in designer clothes and royal jewels. It's hard to make an icon out of nothing.
by Anonymous | reply 194 | August 19, 2016 2:00 AM |
You bitch, R194.
Diana was a beautiful, selfless angel who came to this earth to bless us for a few short years.
What about her work with AIDS patients and landmines?
She was a treasure and and a spectacular icon and always will be!
by Anonymous | reply 195 | August 19, 2016 2:35 AM |
"What about her work with AIDS patients and landmines?"
What "work?" She'd show up, shake a few hands or give somebody (usually a child) a cuddle, and go back to being a pampered Princess. She's no icon. If she's remembered at all, it's for being a royal mental case.
by Anonymous | reply 196 | August 19, 2016 2:52 AM |
Diana wasn't interesting. She wasn't witty or accomplished. She was pretty and blonde and wore pretty clothes to thrill the tabloids and their frau audience. If she had not died such a horrific death, she would have been the Queen of Eurotrashdom.
But the the Windsors are a pretty dull lot as well. Unlike his parents, Harry is the only interesting one who seems to have a brain in his head.
Justin Trudeau is more interesting and accomplished than any of them.
by Anonymous | reply 197 | August 19, 2016 2:54 AM |
So what, R196? She raised awareness. Just going to that AIDS hospital was a hell of a lot more than any other royals would do. It made headlines everywhere.
Diana was an amazing woman and she will always be an icon.
by Anonymous | reply 198 | August 19, 2016 2:55 AM |
I should have know it would be a tacky, bitter Canadian whining on this thread.
Fuck you.
Diana forever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Anonymous | reply 199 | August 19, 2016 2:55 AM |
Canada deserves to have Camilla as its future queen.
by Anonymous | reply 200 | August 19, 2016 3:06 AM |
The week after Princess Diana's death Trump announced that he regretted he had never gotten around to dating her, making the assumption that she would have went out with him.
by Anonymous | reply 201 | August 19, 2016 3:09 AM |
Umm R45 'was' is past tense.
by Anonymous | reply 202 | August 19, 2016 3:17 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 203 | August 19, 2016 4:18 AM |
R197 was making sense until she shoehorned in Justin Trudeau.
by Anonymous | reply 205 | August 19, 2016 5:17 AM |
I wonder if Justin tasted Harry's ginger manhood?
by Anonymous | reply 206 | August 19, 2016 5:41 AM |
Justin's mother Margaret was diagnosed as Bi-Polar, which probably puts Justin at a higher risk of developing that disorder himself...
I can only imagine how hot it would be to be with Justin during a hyper-sexual manic phase...
by Anonymous | reply 207 | August 19, 2016 9:32 PM |
Splendid! I simply utilised this Grindr feature on my phone, and within a few minutes had located 7 men - within my own building! I didn't even need to put my shoes on! This is simply marvelous - I shall hasten to tell Andrew and Edward about this. They shall thrill to it!
by Anonymous | reply 208 | August 19, 2016 11:46 PM |
Can't wait to hear about your adventures in Grindr-land, Royal Ginger! Be sure to keep us updated!
by Anonymous | reply 209 | August 20, 2016 11:22 AM |
While Camilla has never been a beauty, she's not as hideous as some people make her out to be.
by Anonymous | reply 210 | August 20, 2016 5:31 PM |
Is the UK the only country where the rules dictate that the prospective royal bride be of the correct religion (Protestant, ideally Church of England) and a virgin?
Other European royals don't seem to have a problem marrying commoners.
by Anonymous | reply 211 | August 20, 2016 5:45 PM |
r210 Still ugly and those teeth!
by Anonymous | reply 212 | August 20, 2016 5:48 PM |
Guess what they call Charles in Italy, R175...... 'Il Tamponcino' - Little Mr. Tampon.
by Anonymous | reply 213 | August 20, 2016 5:49 PM |
R211 the virgin thing isn't an explicit rule, it was just the done thing up until recently.
by Anonymous | reply 214 | August 20, 2016 5:56 PM |
Even when young, Camilla had some gnarly, jacked-ass teeth.
by Anonymous | reply 215 | August 20, 2016 6:19 PM |
She gives hope to every ugly little girl around the world: you too could grow up to be a Queen.
by Anonymous | reply 216 | August 20, 2016 6:23 PM |
Hillary is no prize, and she may soon be running your country.
by Anonymous | reply 217 | August 20, 2016 6:42 PM |
r217 Oh please, that's like comparing Hermione Baddeley with Eleanor Roosevelt.
by Anonymous | reply 218 | August 20, 2016 6:50 PM |
At least Camilla isn't falling down and convulsing.
by Anonymous | reply 219 | August 20, 2016 6:52 PM |
r219 Camilla's an alcoholic. How do you know how many times she's fallen down?
by Anonymous | reply 220 | August 20, 2016 6:55 PM |
There's a certain Saxe-Coburg look that's considered desirable in British females.--long-faced, thick-lipped, with smallish eyes and a big honker. It looks homely to us but to them it irresistibly suggests aristocratic ancestry. Benedict Cumberbatch's wife has it in spades.
by Anonymous | reply 221 | August 20, 2016 7:02 PM |
r221 I've heard it all now.
by Anonymous | reply 222 | August 20, 2016 7:03 PM |
I've been trying to imagine why Camille would put in the pain and effort to go the route of cosmetic surgery, cosmetic dentistry, facial fillers, marathon shopping and all of the other things DL seems to want from her.
Her husband would still be butt ugly. Her family either wouldn't care or they wouldn't like it. The English press would never get over it. Her life wouldn't be the tiniest bit better.
by Anonymous | reply 223 | August 20, 2016 7:12 PM |
Camilla looks like an 80s Dusty Springfield on a bender.
by Anonymous | reply 224 | August 20, 2016 7:43 PM |
[quote] What was the reason why Charles and Camilla weren't allowed to get married in the 70s? I can't remember what made her unsuitable in the eyes of the Royal Family.
1. She came from a trashy family. Her father was a liquor/wine salesman. And before anyone says it, there was a side of her family that was wealthy. She was not on that side of the family.
2. She was a gigantic whore when she was younger (before she married andrew parker bowles). Camilla Shand was always up for a shag
I love how William and Harry hate her and want nothing to do with Charles and Camilla. Just recently Harry gave an interview talking about how he wished he had talked more about his mother passing away and his grief when he was younger but he didn't feel it was right because it would have upset camilla. How disgusting is that? What a piece of shit father Charles is. His mistress's feelings mattered more to charles than his own son's feelings. It's hilarious how William and Kate keep the grandchildren away from charles and camilla. It bothered charles so much that he had a member of his staff complain to a tabloid about not seeing his grandchildren. William and Harry all live at Kensington Palace now and it seems like they mention Diana in all their recent interviews, especially Harry. William only makes the bare minimum of appearances with the Royal Family. I think he will become a private citizen when the Queen passes away
by Anonymous | reply 225 | August 20, 2016 7:53 PM |
It was obvious from the start that Diana was being married to Charles for breeding purposes only. Even back then it was shocking for someone so young to be marrying this old guy she obviously had nothing in common with and immediately start popping out babies. She did her job, he did his and they had no further use for each other. She did turn out to have added value as PR for the royal family at a time when they weren't very popular but that backfired when the press started paying attention to her and Charles' not very discreet amours. He was pretty much forced to dump her and marry Camilla just to put a respectable face on the situation a la Woody marrying Soon-Yi.
by Anonymous | reply 226 | August 20, 2016 7:57 PM |
With the slight difference that Charles and Camilla is a pretty much respectabe situation, while Woody Allen is obviously a complete sicko.
by Anonymous | reply 227 | August 20, 2016 8:14 PM |
r227 Nice try. Why don't you Brits give it up? A closet queer (Charles) married to his drunken fag hag.
by Anonymous | reply 228 | August 20, 2016 8:18 PM |
R221, is it called "Patrician?"
by Anonymous | reply 229 | August 20, 2016 8:24 PM |
So for William and Harry - they don't have a mother any more, and they don't have much of a father, either, so basically they're orphans.
by Anonymous | reply 230 | August 20, 2016 8:26 PM |
r228 Still not much wrong with that. Alcohol is unacceptable now? Do we have Sharia law? And Charles seems to be very much a bisexual, few gay men dream of being tampons.
I'm not a Brit, but they should absolutely have the last word on the Windsors, not pathetic American fanboys who always dreamed of being princesses.
by Anonymous | reply 231 | August 20, 2016 8:27 PM |
r229 That one is nuts r221. Don't pay any attention.
by Anonymous | reply 232 | August 20, 2016 8:28 PM |
r231 Honey, I was born a Queen. Suck my royal dick.
by Anonymous | reply 233 | August 20, 2016 8:30 PM |
R194 said "its hard to make an icon out of nothing"............... Someone should tell that to the Kardashians
by Anonymous | reply 234 | August 20, 2016 8:33 PM |
"I love how William and Harry hate her and want nothing to do with Charles and Camilla."
They actually get along perfectly fine with Charles & Camilla. William & Harry are adults, not vindictive fangirls.
by Anonymous | reply 235 | August 20, 2016 8:39 PM |
r235 Charles told them they had to. Camilla called Kate "trash", and poor William had grin and bare it.
by Anonymous | reply 236 | August 20, 2016 8:43 PM |
Did he tell you this down the pub, R236?
by Anonymous | reply 237 | August 20, 2016 8:45 PM |
r237 No honey, we're not a nation of drunks like you Brits. 'Down at the pub'. My cousin married a Brit and the deciding factor of her marital acceptance was based on the fact that she didn't want to end up like her family spending all their time at the local pub. She's no cockney; her father was a nuclear engineer.
by Anonymous | reply 238 | August 20, 2016 8:53 PM |
"Camilla called Kate "trash""
Camilla reads DL!
by Anonymous | reply 239 | August 20, 2016 9:05 PM |
Maybe Charles was bored and exasperated with Diana, who, despite her charm and beauty, was quite the drama queen, as well as being almost a generation younger, but it beggars belief that he stayed with Camilla. Surely he could have found someone more suitable and compatible and acceptable to the British public.
by Anonymous | reply 240 | August 20, 2016 9:09 PM |
r240 So he ended up with a ugly, hated hag like Camilla. And she's acceptable?
by Anonymous | reply 241 | August 20, 2016 9:12 PM |
[quote]I've been trying to imagine why Camille would put in the pain and effort to go the route of cosmetic surgery, cosmetic dentistry, facial fillers, marathon shopping and all of the other things DL seems to want from her.
Her husband would still be butt ugly. Her family either wouldn't care or they wouldn't like it. The English press would never get over it. Her life wouldn't be the tiniest bit better.
So you're saying that Camilla should just have another drink?
I think that's pretty much what she's decided too.
by Anonymous | reply 242 | August 20, 2016 9:22 PM |
I think Tracey Ullman has it just about right.
by Anonymous | reply 243 | August 20, 2016 9:27 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 244 | August 20, 2016 9:42 PM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 245 | August 20, 2016 9:46 PM |
Her 1980s hairdo cracks me up. Clearly she wants to be Krstal Carrington.
by Anonymous | reply 246 | August 20, 2016 9:47 PM |
She doesn't look any worse than Horsey Charles. It only matters that Phil shot his sperm into Lillibet.
by Anonymous | reply 247 | August 20, 2016 10:17 PM |
She's not much to look at, but neither is Charles - and his mother is frumpy and all men end up marrying their mothers. They seem happy together and it appears as if she gets along with Harry & William, though who knows what goes on behind clothes door. If Diana were alive, she'd be a post-menopausal nightmare for both of them.
by Anonymous | reply 248 | August 20, 2016 10:39 PM |
Diana, whatever....
I have my own exquisite personal sense of style that makes that little tart COMPLETELY forgettable...
When I take off my Wellies, I look quite extraordinary...and I'm drunk most of the time.
by Anonymous | reply 249 | August 21, 2016 12:06 AM |
Case in Point -
I manage to make this Couture dress look like a rag from the discount table at Old Navy with my banging tits and sagging...everything...
by Anonymous | reply 250 | August 21, 2016 12:12 AM |
But at least she's wearing stockings, R250.
by Anonymous | reply 251 | August 21, 2016 12:16 AM |
My father was a nuclear engineer!
by Anonymous | reply 252 | August 21, 2016 12:19 AM |
Is Charles able to become king now that he's been divorced and remarried to a divorcee?
by Anonymous | reply 253 | August 21, 2016 12:28 AM |
Oh for fuck's sake, woman.
Veneers.
Never mind the sagging skin, the jowls, the wrinkles. You can hide most of them under your clothes. But those fucking teeth! Everyone can see them, you know.
by Anonymous | reply 254 | August 21, 2016 12:44 AM |
What does the Queen think of Camilla? And does Camilla still smoke? I know she was practically a chain-smoker for years, but don't know if she's quit.
by Anonymous | reply 255 | August 21, 2016 1:11 AM |
I'd rather a night out with Camilla than Diana.
by Anonymous | reply 256 | August 21, 2016 1:22 AM |
Diana was the queen of my heart!
by Anonymous | reply 257 | August 21, 2016 1:26 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 258 | August 21, 2016 2:23 AM |
That is a tragic story, R258
by Anonymous | reply 259 | August 21, 2016 3:26 AM |
R211 - I know that was the case in the U.S. where I live (not including Las Vegas or Hollywood), a woman had to be the right religion and a virgin in order to walk down the aisle with their son and also to have a church wedding with the privilege of wearing the traditional white wedding gown. That has all since changed, but up until the late 70's that's how it was, at least in most parts of the U.S. Also, that was a time when most women married in their early 20's, so being a virgin wasn't all that difficult.
That's also when Brides finally got smart and removed the word 'obey' from the wedding vows, and "I now pronounce you Husband and Wife" replaced the former "I now pronounce you Man and Wife."
by Anonymous | reply 260 | August 21, 2016 3:44 AM |
Looks like Camilla made that frumpy dress in R249 from Miss Ellen's good curtains...
by Anonymous | reply 261 | August 21, 2016 4:48 AM |
When you get invited for a night out by the two, R256, by ALL means let Diana know you prefer to get drunk with Camilla...
by Anonymous | reply 262 | August 21, 2016 4:52 AM |
You know that fundamentalist family the Duggars - 19 and Counting - whose religion appears to be based completely on the oppression of women?
I don't think even one of those Duggar women would wear this dress.
by Anonymous | reply 263 | August 21, 2016 6:59 PM |
"I'm afraid I'm too drunk to stand at the moment. But you are a very attractive man and I should like to get to know you better if you would come to my hotel later."
by Anonymous | reply 264 | August 21, 2016 7:03 PM |
She always wears white or yellowish white or grayish white. Like cigarette ash.
by Anonymous | reply 265 | August 21, 2016 7:11 PM |
R100 Yes I agree. Diana was a hopeless and loveless tart. She was an utter bore.
by Anonymous | reply 267 | August 21, 2016 7:32 PM |
"Dear God, my royal flask is completely empty."
by Anonymous | reply 268 | August 21, 2016 7:35 PM |
Edina Monsoon + Patsy Stone = Camilla
by Anonymous | reply 269 | August 21, 2016 7:46 PM |
I didn't say it was tea in my cup...
Just mind your OWN fucking bloody business!
Who died and made you Queen? Well, whatever...you know what I mean...
by Anonymous | reply 270 | August 21, 2016 8:06 PM |
There's nothing to see here...
Everyone move along now.
by Anonymous | reply 271 | August 21, 2016 8:10 PM |
Why does Camilla look so tanned in some pictures? Like someone who spends a lot of time in the sun.
by Anonymous | reply 272 | August 21, 2016 8:13 PM |
I love this thread!
by Anonymous | reply 274 | August 21, 2016 9:01 PM |
I kinda love that Camilla doesn't give a fuck.
by Anonymous | reply 275 | August 21, 2016 11:33 PM |
"She came from a trashy family. Her father was a liquor/wine salesman. And before anyone says it, there was a side of her family that was wealthy. She was not on that side of the family."
Wait---a "salesperson."
by Anonymous | reply 276 | August 23, 2016 1:05 AM |
In England, plastic surgery is for WAGs and reality TV stars. Not for the seriously upper class and certainly not for Royalty. It would be considered undignified and common. Completely different mindset than the US and many other countries.
by Anonymous | reply 277 | August 23, 2016 1:57 AM |
As if Kate Middleton hasn't had a ton of plastic surgery?
by Anonymous | reply 278 | August 23, 2016 4:34 AM |
Exactly R279, the Royal Family chose and paid the French Orthodontist to fix Kate's teeth before the engagement was announced.
So STFU, R277, how much time do you spend in the Royal palaces?
by Anonymous | reply 279 | August 23, 2016 8:57 PM |
"So for William and Harry - they don't have a mother any more, and they don't have much of a father, either, so basically they're orphans."
"Orphans?' Do you think they're both still in elementary school? They're grown men; they don't need a mother to hold their hands or tuck them into bed. And as for Charles...well, by all accounts he is a good father. He was never overtly demonstrative like potty Diana, but he was a good father. Diana made concerted efforts to portray him as an uninterested parent, but that was just her manipulative effort to make him look bad. He's done well by his sons. And they LIKE Camilla. They're happy their father is with the right person for him.
by Anonymous | reply 280 | August 27, 2016 1:10 AM |
R280=Camilla
Sorry, but I can smell the horse shit, your horrendous body odor, and the stale cigarette smoke, dear...
by Anonymous | reply 281 | August 27, 2016 1:29 AM |
There it is, you ARE to BATHE completely before attending any event at which I am present!
I don't care if it's indoors or out - it IS WRITTEN in the Pre-Nup!
How many times must I point it out to you?
by Anonymous | reply 282 | August 27, 2016 1:37 AM |
R281 must be a fangurl of the rotting corpse that was once Diana, the half witted, slutty, potty Princess of Wales. Poor chap. Pathetic, that one.
by Anonymous | reply 283 | August 27, 2016 2:23 AM |
Well, she's no Diana, that's for sure!
by Anonymous | reply 284 | August 27, 2016 2:29 AM |
Quite the British accent you've affected there, R283...
Adds SO much to your credibility.
Well, hello Guv'ner!
by Anonymous | reply 285 | August 27, 2016 2:58 AM |
She's old and has osteoporosis. She makes the best of what she has body and face-wise.
The thing about most Royals is they are secure in their position in the social hierarchy and in life in general, so they don't feel the need to impress by how they look or dress.
Both the Queen and Princess Margaret had in their younger days stated with slight variations "I am not a film star. I don't have to look glamorous."
by Anonymous | reply 286 | August 27, 2016 4:10 AM |
Camilla's so secure in her Royal personhood she doesn't bother to wear a bra...
by Anonymous | reply 287 | August 27, 2016 4:15 AM |
'E's right, old R286...
I'm a Royal, you see, frough and frough...
Same reason I feels secure walking down to the Pub for a warm pint after dinner most ev'nings...
by Anonymous | reply 288 | August 27, 2016 4:42 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 289 | August 27, 2016 4:53 AM |
Camilla looks fine. More attractive overall than Princess Di who had a weird furtive expression.
by Anonymous | reply 290 | August 27, 2016 5:11 AM |
Oy! .All that money and she still looks like shit.
by Anonymous | reply 291 | August 27, 2016 5:24 AM |
I shudder to think what she would look like if she weren't rich.
by Anonymous | reply 292 | August 27, 2016 5:32 AM |
I think she looks fine.
by Anonymous | reply 293 | August 27, 2016 5:37 AM |
[quote]I think she looks fine for an old alcoholic woman with bad teeth who doesn't bathe properly.
There, I fixed it for you, R293.
by Anonymous | reply 294 | August 27, 2016 12:26 PM |
And if Charlie ain't too knackered...
Some nights he give me the Rumpy Pumpy before we goes to sleep...
Well, some nights it's after I'm snoring...trufh be told....
by Anonymous | reply 295 | August 27, 2016 12:36 PM |
'Ave I got time for just one fag?
I'm dying of a nicotine fit, Luvs.
by Anonymous | reply 296 | August 27, 2016 1:21 PM |
LOL this thread is so wrong. I love it.
by Anonymous | reply 297 | August 27, 2016 1:51 PM |
Camilla "gave up" in the 70's. It's all been downhill since then.
by Anonymous | reply 298 | August 27, 2016 2:39 PM |
I tries 'ard but after I've knocked back a few...
Well, me seams get a bit askew....
And it's ever so 'ard to get 'em straight again
by Anonymous | reply 299 | August 27, 2016 3:27 PM |
Is any of this supposed to be funny? It's about as amusing as that "M" shit.
by Anonymous | reply 301 | August 27, 2016 4:45 PM |
She was also on the payroll of the multi-billion dollar global horror known as HIV/AID$ Inc.
As if she did not have enough money already?
by Anonymous | reply 302 | August 27, 2016 5:42 PM |
Remember how hot and heavy they were when they were hooking up behind Diana's back? I wonder how soon after they become legit did the sex dry up.
by Anonymous | reply 303 | August 27, 2016 6:35 PM |
No, R301, and we're all sorry we forced you to read it...ALL.
Now, go on with your busy, busy life in your Mommy's basement.
I think I smell a caftan that could use a good washing...
by Anonymous | reply 304 | August 27, 2016 6:36 PM |
Do you think she watches while Charles gets head from his male valet?
by Anonymous | reply 305 | August 27, 2016 6:48 PM |
Wow r304 you're just as unfunny as your stupid captions. And speaking of having no life, you really need to give it a rest. Searching out pics of Camilla all day and constantly posting them - retarded.
by Anonymous | reply 306 | August 27, 2016 7:21 PM |
r306 I would never stop looking at those pictures of that hag. I laugh every time I see a new one. Keep 'em coming r304.
by Anonymous | reply 307 | August 27, 2016 7:47 PM |
I think it's fucking hilarious.
Off-topic question---did mid-level service people (like butlers and chauffeurs and nannies) ever acquire posh accents in England, or was it that considered not knowing one's place?
by Anonymous | reply 308 | August 27, 2016 8:50 PM |
I think Charles likes them rough looking (and smelling).
by Anonymous | reply 310 | August 27, 2016 9:28 PM |
But Camilla likes them young and nubile....
With a generous side of Gin and Tonic...
by Anonymous | reply 311 | August 28, 2016 12:53 AM |
Charles preferring weatherbeaten, unglamourous Camilla to the beautiful Diana, really, you couldn't make it up!
by Anonymous | reply 312 | August 28, 2016 7:35 AM |
Camilla has had a face/neck lift, believe it or not. Check the neck and jaw line.
by Anonymous | reply 314 | August 28, 2016 8:47 AM |
What was the last thing going through her head before she died?
The radiator.
by Anonymous | reply 317 | August 28, 2016 2:58 PM |
I don't know, I think if she dropped some saddle padding, she'd clean up quite nicely.
by Anonymous | reply 318 | August 28, 2016 3:10 PM |
She'll never have your legs, Rose.
by Anonymous | reply 319 | August 28, 2016 3:13 PM |
I can't stand camilla, but don't be so harsh about her clothes. She's fat, frumpy and ugly. There is only so much she can do with herself. There aren't any clothes in the world that will make her look good. The best she can hope for is to be presentable. And with such a whiny, spoiled, jealous bitch for a husband she needs to be as low key and inconspicuous as possible
And I read somewhere that even though she looks like she just woke up and put on what ever was lying around on the floor of her bedroom, a lot of work actually goes into her making her look like this. She has a full staff of dressers, makeup artists and hair stylists and when she goes on tour she takes a staff of ten people to help dress her and make her presentable. I also think it's fucking hilarious that she used to make fun of Diana for worrying about her appearance, and here is Camilla spending her last years doing the same damned thing
by Anonymous | reply 320 | August 28, 2016 5:28 PM |
R320 I don't think anyone ever really believed Camilla looked down on Diana because of her love of fashion for intellectual reasons.
by Anonymous | reply 321 | August 28, 2016 5:43 PM |
R320, your fist paragraph is DL gold. Brava!
by Anonymous | reply 322 | August 28, 2016 5:57 PM |
Well then just imagine what she would look like if she weren't wealthy and with a full staff to help her get dressed. Or maybe not.
by Anonymous | reply 323 | August 29, 2016 2:15 AM |
She's a mess. Her parents should have named her Shit Happens.
by Anonymous | reply 324 | August 29, 2016 2:20 AM |
r315 You know you belong in a mental institution. Seriously, get some professional help.
by Anonymous | reply 325 | August 29, 2016 12:46 PM |
R315, those pictures have been proven to not be of Diana. Just some other unfortunate blond in a car accident.
by Anonymous | reply 326 | August 29, 2016 2:35 PM |
What does it matter? She's married to the right person and has the same rights whether she's a fashion maven or a frump. It's the monarchy, where you don't have to have a brain in your head.
by Anonymous | reply 327 | August 29, 2016 2:49 PM |
R328 Oh, God, is that cash in her hand?! Was she actually counting cash at a public function? Did she bite any of the gold and silver gifts to ensure they were real?
by Anonymous | reply 329 | August 29, 2016 4:40 PM |
* SQUISH! *
SCREAM FRAUS SCREAM!!!!
by Anonymous | reply 330 | August 29, 2016 6:24 PM |
The darn thing must have been made of tin-foil!
by Anonymous | reply 331 | August 29, 2016 6:26 PM |
Bump
by Anonymous | reply 332 | September 12, 2016 1:10 AM |
Oh darlings, I gave up years ago, says Camilla sipping her straight Vodka.
What are the Royals going to do? Have me killed? Hahaha, snort, haha.
by Anonymous | reply 333 | September 12, 2016 1:25 AM |
She probably suits herself. It's not as if most of those around her care that much about fashion and all that bullshit. Leave that to bits of fluff like Kate and Diana,
by Anonymous | reply 334 | September 12, 2016 1:48 AM |
Say what you will - those Royal titties are going to swing free in the wind
Apparently even the Queen can't change that.
by Anonymous | reply 335 | September 13, 2016 9:38 AM |
Charles (Tampon) loves her no matter what she looks like.
by Anonymous | reply 336 | September 19, 2016 6:33 PM |
R336 Apparently so.
by Anonymous | reply 337 | September 21, 2016 2:03 AM |
Charles and Camilla's marriage is in name only now: she drinks and he sucks his personal assistants' and valets' dicks.
by Anonymous | reply 338 | September 21, 2016 11:51 AM |
Just melt her down and you'll reveal a lump of lead as cold as steel, there where a woman's heart should be.
Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, has no soul. There, I've said it.
by Anonymous | reply 339 | September 21, 2016 2:24 PM |
Sounds good to me, r339. She not only survived, she triumphed. There, I've said it.
by Anonymous | reply 340 | September 21, 2016 3:24 PM |
R340 She won the battle, but I guarantee you the bitch will lose the war.
by Anonymous | reply 341 | September 21, 2016 3:28 PM |
She's won the war, dear.
by Anonymous | reply 342 | September 21, 2016 4:16 PM |
r342 Not until she's Queen dear.
by Anonymous | reply 343 | September 21, 2016 4:20 PM |
She's just what the Kingdom needs - a Queen who looks and acts like a Talladega barfly.
by Anonymous | reply 344 | September 21, 2016 4:30 PM |
Let's all raise our glass to our patron saint!
by Anonymous | reply 345 | September 21, 2016 4:34 PM |
r342: She got exactly what she wanted, dear.
She has dowdy clothes, bad teeth and an absence of 'glamour', but she doesn't give a shit.
And she cares even less about the petulant squeals of her detractors.
by Anonymous | reply 346 | September 21, 2016 4:57 PM |
Is she definitely going to be Queen Consort? Is there any chance Charles will be passed over? They both seem so old, frail, misanthropic and musty. Wouldn't the Queen (and most UK citizens) prefer the more vibrant and relatable couple to be the face of the monarchy?
by Anonymous | reply 347 | September 21, 2016 4:58 PM |
That's quite likely. To close friends, Elizabeth has confided she can't bear the thought of Charles becoming Queen.
by Anonymous | reply 348 | September 21, 2016 5:01 PM |
R348, Gary Morton also cautioned Lucille Ball against accepting the role.
by Anonymous | reply 349 | September 22, 2016 3:35 AM |
I run race, climb hill, then poop!
by Anonymous | reply 350 | September 22, 2016 9:16 PM |
Evil Camilla, the perpetually horny step-monster, would love to get her claws on Harry.
"I would eat him - literally."
by Anonymous | reply 351 | October 6, 2016 9:31 AM |
Is Charles a homosexual?
by Anonymous | reply 353 | October 6, 2016 9:55 AM |
Well, he's married to this ugly man - draw your own conclusions.
by Anonymous | reply 354 | October 6, 2016 10:23 AM |
Some random UFO just landed on her head that palace guards just let it happen?
by Anonymous | reply 355 | October 6, 2016 10:28 AM |
A UFO would be far more attractive...
And at least then Camilla would finally get probed.
by Anonymous | reply 356 | October 6, 2016 2:32 PM |
r347- r348: DianaFrau alert!
You girls can go back to fingering your cooter over Wills and Harry pics.
by Anonymous | reply 357 | October 6, 2016 3:25 PM |
I've been reading the book Game of Crowns (it's on the ebook3000 website) and in it Queen Elizabeth absolutely hates Camilla. In it, the Queen makes plans to abdicate when she turns 90 or when Prince Philip dies. It might have even happened earlier if Charles hadn't so royally screwed things with Diana. He almost brought down the whole monarchy. Even all these years later, things are kind of dicey. Scotland could still vote for independence. I still believe he will be king someday, but it won't be for long.
It may be mostly conjecture, but it's a pretty good read.
The Queen's best friend Margaret Rhodes died yesterday. Apparently it was quite sudden, but she was 91 so that can never be a huge surprise. I hope Elizabeth hangs in there for a good decade more, and never gives up the throne to Charles voluntarily.
by Anonymous | reply 358 | November 27, 2016 2:34 AM |
Oow... haha ..snort. I'm afraid I just shat myself haha. Well, maybe just one more G n T.
by Anonymous | reply 359 | November 27, 2016 4:43 AM |
Bump
by Anonymous | reply 360 | April 30, 2019 12:15 AM |
She has smoked and rank with abandon probably since she was about 15-16. She's 70 now. Of course she looks bad. She also is "outdoorsy" and never bothered to protect her skin.
by Anonymous | reply 361 | April 30, 2019 12:45 AM |
But can a woman who looks like Phyllis Diller actually become the Queen Consort?
by Anonymous | reply 362 | April 30, 2019 2:12 AM |