Uncircumcised guys: how do you KNOW it feels better?

If you have to ask ....

My cut partners have had weaker orgasms, they're much quieter, and have to "bang" harder to get off. Uncut guys were much wilder in response.

Not scientific, of course.

Finally, someone shines a light on the deeply smegma=encrusted corner inhabited by DL's uncut set.

they don't.

Because I have pulled the skin tight and tried fucking and masturbating and it just isn't as good. I can imitate being cut, you will never know the feeling of being uncut.

[quote] you will never know the feeling of being uncut.

Thank you, Mother. Thank you, Father.

Presumably the OP is referring to posts on Datalounge, can we have some links to them please.

A more logical chain of events would be an uncut guy getting cut, and then saying afterwards that it wasn't as good.

Also, when I was younger, I put some spit in the end of a condom and jacked off, leaving the condom very loose around the head of my dick, and in my opinion it was pretty much the same sensation of having a foreskin. (I am uncut, so I know what it feels like, and using the condom like that gave the same sort of sensation.)

Do you cut guys ever bathe? some of you pretend a dick is a smegma machine, emitting five ounces of gorganzola a day.

You cock-hating fraus are the worst. I'm sorry you got snipped, and I guess it feels better to convince yourself that the surgery is a plus.

[quote]Because I have pulled the skin tight and tried fucking and masturbating and it just isn't as good. I can imitate being cut, you will never know the feeling of being uncut.

Finally! An uncut guy offers something substantive. Thanks, R5. I'm not sure if that is a full... eggplant to eggplant comparison, because, you can't REALLY know what being fully circumcised feels like, but it certainly makes sense than the guys who just insist they KNOW.

I'm cut. If it felt any better I'd be walking around with a hardon all day and come at the first touch. I'm damn sensitive as it is.

[quote]A more logical chain of events would be an uncut guy getting cut, and then saying afterwards that it wasn't as good.

There was an article in GQ years ago about this and a guy being interviewed said he got cut because his fiance insisted on it and she ended up breaking off the engagement. He said about 18 months after the circ he already noticed a difference in sensation.

And some German gay porn star got cut because he said he used to cum to quick and now that he's cut he can lost longer, so I guess he gained stamina by losing sensitivity.

OP, I guess you'd have to ask the ones who were cut later in life, their bananas could provide a before and after report about the peel.

They don't know dick, OP.

They don't know what a blow job feels like. Nobody wants to suck on foreskin.

I do! I do!

I'm bi and got circumcised In my twenties after most girls suggested it was what the' prefer. I've been a sexually active circumcised man for over a decade now. There is no difference in orgasm. Other than the hygiene factor, the only other only other difference, explained to me by a very, shall we say 'experienced', woman is that uncircumcised men's thrust during sex seems driven by the tip while that of circumcised men comes from the entire shaft. Which would explain why American andTurkish men are considered some of the best lays by many European women.

I think masturbation is easier with a foreskin but that's just a mechanics thing. If I ever get a son, he's getting cut at birth.

I was with a guy who claimed he was circumcised after immigrating here from Costa Rica and said that he lost a lot of feeling. He said he did it to look more like the guys around here--to fit in.

and HE said*

Why do I get the feeling that R17 is full of shit.

Because you want to believe he is, r20. He doesn't fit your narrative.

And it affects men how, R17? We could give a fuck about what women want for the most part. They already get all of that.

R21, you earlier wrote

[quote]They don't know what a blow job feels like. Nobody wants to suck on foreskin.

You probably wrote R17 as well. This place has the craziest anti-uncut people I've met. It's just amazing how deeply some crazies here hate uncut cocks. It's like religious fundies trying to convince people that cut cocks are better.

It's not religious fundies who know cut is best, R23. Just a bunch of veteran cocksuckers.

I thought they were the same thing, R24.

Anyone who has sucked a cock knows that uncut men get off more than the cut ones. Come now.

The cut is better troll is almost as bad as the anti-trans troll.

[quote]I think masturbation is easier with a foreskin

I'll never have a kid, but if I did, and it was a boy, I'd leave him uncut for this reason alone. The simple pleasure of jerking off an uncut guy -- it just works so perfectly, no need for any lube -- I'd want my son to have that. The intactivists are stupid people, I know that being cut isn't some incredible hardship, but... there really is no point to it.

Medically, it's roughly comparable to the difference in sensitivity between your lips and the inside of your mouth. The glans of an uncut penis is mucous membrane like the inside of your mouth. When its foreskin is removed it has to toughen up a bit, and changes into dry skin, like the skin of your lips. In evolutionary terms human lips are bits of mouth-lining which became everted and changed to skin - they are still sensitive; just not as sensitive.

Personally I don't feel strongly about the aesthetic issue, but I don't agree with children being given significant surgery for no reason. If they want to get cut when they are adults, that's their choice. Aesthetics and religion aside, the justifications for infant circumcision are mostly self-serving baloney. The foreskin of the human penis is designed to be largely self-cleaning, like the ears and nose. An average degree of personal hygiene is fine to keep everything healthy. As for the supposed threat of penile cancer, have you ever actually heard of anyone with penile cancer? Cancer of the prostate yes, testicles yes frequently, anus yes, penis - never. It seems to a very well-designed durable organ, well capable of taking what we throw at it.

True or false? Most pro-cut guys here really don't give a shit whether other guys are uncut or not. It's just that the uncut queens are so much fun to pick on, who can resist? You get SUCH a rise out of the Stanksleeve Adoration Society.

How can it possibly be more pleasurable when circumcision deadens the nerve endings in the tip of the penis. I'm quite sure that women appreciate a man with a desensitised cock who has to bang them forever to cum. But, from a male perspective, it's preferable to have options......cum quick OR take your time. And the whole "cheese" thing is only a problem if you're the kind of man who is a stranger to personal hygiene. and those men wouldn't advocate having their arse sewn up because they can't be bothered to clean their arsehole.

[quote]explained to me by a very, shall we say 'experienced', woman is that uncircumcised men's thrust during sex seems driven by the tip while that of circumcised men comes from the entire shaft. Which would explain why American andTurkish men are considered some of the best lays by many European women.

That's something only a circ fetishist would write.

One of my exes was cut as an adult. He said he decided to do it because he thought it would make sex feel more powerful, more intense. In the end it seemed to have the opposite effect. I think it severely desensitized him because he took a long time to cum and could rarely finish unless he was jerking himself off (with a rather tight grip).

I didn't ask him too many questions because I could tell by the way he responded that it was (for lack of a better term) a sensitive topic for him.

[quote]You get SUCH a rise out of the Stanksleeve Adoration Society.

You only imagine you're getting a rise out of them. People bitching about foreskin invariably sound like ignorant prudes, so you should assume the response is something more along the lines of a mild chuckle or rolling of the eyes. Now, it is incredibly easy to get a rise out of the cut guys who've decided that circumcision has RUINED their life, but that's just a pathetic straight guy thing. Better to leave them to their self-inflicted misery.

*Desensitzed

*desensitized!!!

Anyone who's had sex with an uncut man know they are more sensitive.

I prefer uncut. (I'm cut)

I'ts ironice that the anti-uncut brigade always talk about cheese and hygiene. I keep looking for an uncut guy willing to feed me cheese and its almost impossible to find. Cheese is actually very rare. :(

All about the circumcised dicks...

OP: You don't have to be a genius to figure out that an intact penis has more nerve endings and preserves the head's sensitivity. And yes, R37, intact men are clean. You would have to not shower for days to accumulate anything. Why do cut guys thin they're so clean? They have to wash their dicks too. Love my foreskin. I couldn't imagine being cut.

I know this is an old thread but WTF. I was uncut until I was 22 and then made the biggest mistake of my life just because a couple of morons made some disparaging comments about uncircumsized dicks and I wanted to fit in. My masturbation has never been the same since, and that includes making myself cum when having sex with others of course. Now I need lube which I never needed before. The foreskin acts as a kind of tunnel or wall that gently rubs the head of your penis as you masturbate, like a natural lubricant but better because it doesn't dry up, and makes your cock feel if you were actually fucking. This doesn't happen anymore. The orgasms haven't been bad, of course, but there's no question that penises were not meant to be sliced up, just like any other part of your body is not supposed to be carved up. I wish to God I hadn't done it. I also wish to God I had met guys who affirmed my wholeness when I was intact. Now I only seem to find guys who tell me I shouldn't have done it because they love uncut dicks.

You shouldn't have done it, R40, because I love uncut dicks.

JC Mondruix had a circumcision in his twenties. He said it feels much better.

[quote] Uncircumcised guys: how do you KNOW it feels better?

Of course it feels better. The Kellogs guy advocated for circumcision to be used to make boys stop masturbating by conditioning boys to feel pain when they touch their penis. So that's one fewer condition that can get in the way of uncut men to really enjoy masturbation and sex than cut men have.

Besides most cut men I know are into kinky stuff that involves pain and I believe them getting their foreskin cut off led them to equate pain with pleasure.

As an uncut guy I don't see pain as pleasurable (or making it a better or more intense sexual experience) and sex and masturbation feels great without having to put pain into the mix.

I remember some cut guy posting once:

[quote] If I was any MORE sensitive, I’d shoot off in my shorts while jogging! NO THANK YOU!

I personally don’t want any premature ejaculators around. But that’s just me.

It looks worse. Gross looking. Cut is better.

I love uncircumcised - so hot.

[quote]My cut partners have had weaker orgasms, they're much quieter, and have to "bang" harder to get off.

You’ve clearly been fucking the wrong cut guys. My orgasms are volcanic, not quiet at all. I havd no idea what “bang harder” means so I can’t address that.

I do think that uncut guys who call cut guys “mutilated” and try to make them feel like they are less because of having a cut dick are vile.

R45 - And the opinion of a fat, balding 64 year old mutilated American matters so much to me. /s

You've cut off many thousands of nerve endings, and the protective covering of the glans that keeps it form drying out (keratinizing). Of course uncut feels better.

And blowing both cut and uncut guys it's obvious... uncut guys are WAY more sensitive. If I blow gently on the head of a cut guy, no reaction. Across the board. Blow gently across the head of an uncut guy, and there's ALWAYS a definite reaction.

Circumcision is stupid. At BEST it's unnecessary, non-consensual cosmetic surgery on an infant. And the reason it's done as a matter of habit is hilariously wrong... it was promoted to keep young boys from masturbating. It obviously doesn't work, and it's puritanical ignorance. I cannot fucking imagine why it's still a 'standard' thin here in 2018. The only good news is that it's becoming less and less common.

R45, you're just an idiot. Just becasue it's what you're used to doesn't make it better. Besides, who the fuck cares what a limp dick looks like. Erect, they're just as beautiful (see: Bel Ami, some of the most beautiful cocks on the planet). Further, uncut cocks are more FUNCTIONAL. You can do more with them, you don't NEED lube, they're more sensitive, and more fun. And of course, there are some horrifically ugly cut dicks, and terrible looking circumcision scars out there.

So fuck off with that childish attitude. Grow up. Get some experience in the real world.

Look, cut guys can't grow their foreskin back. They have to make the best of a shitty situation and convince themselves that it was done in their best interest or else they have to add another resentment issue on their already existing, big pile of resentment issues.

It’s science. We know how many nerve endings are in foreskin. Next.

Troll thread. # Team 4Skin.

r29 my dad had penile cancer, and had to have about a third removed. he was uncut: prior to diagnosing him with cancer, they blamed infection from phimosis

R54, that has nothing to do with cosmetic routine circumcision.

I had kidney stones. Does that mean we should remove a kidney from every baby at birth? I mean seriously, think.

r55 i didn’t say anyone should or shouldn’t get circumcised, i replied to someone who said he had never heard of anyone getting penile cancer with a personal anecdote.

[quote]I mean seriously, think.

go fuck yourself.

R55 Yes, according that logic: pull all teeth as a preventive measure too, and be fitted for dentures.

R56, then you should have been more clear, because the context of your reply made it sound like you were saying "I know a guy who had dick cancer, blame the foreskin, therefore routine circumcision is justified".

YOU were the one who wasn't clear, so go fuck yourself. it's not up to the rest of us to read your mind.

At age 5, I had a tonsillectomy and circumcision "because it was too tight" at the same time. I've never been the same since . . .

How cruel to do both at once R59. There are very effective stretching methods for phimosis. Steroid creams can be prescribed too.

R59 They circumcised you because the skin around your penis head was too tight? That seems absurd. Most guys have tight skin at first but tight skin can be stretched with gentle pulling over a matter of a few weeks.

There are rare cases where a boy's foreskin is indeed too tight to fully retract over the head of the penis. But it is quite rare.

Uncut dicks look ugly and taste terrible.

American gays and women sound insane and childish when they talk about uncut dick. It is the way that nature made it, it is NORMAL.

...and NOT dropping dead in droves from penile cancer R64.

Foreskin is gross looking. Case closed.

This won't be a popular response, but the UN has been advocating for circumcision for men in Africa for sometime, because there is a definite statistical increase in HIV infections in heterosexual men that are "intact" vs. those who have been circumcised.

To whit:

"There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe. WHO | Male circumcision for HIV prevention www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/"

That being said, obviously most gay men acquire HIV through anal sex as the passive partner, and this would not apply.

We're talking about two different things here: penile sensitivity and orgasm intensity. They are two very different things, and vary greatly even when you look only at uncut guys or only at cut guys. Plus, so many other factors can be involved, such as alcohol/drug consumption, tiredness, horniness, overall health, attraction to partner, libido, medications, etc. This thread's argument will never be settled. You might as well have a debate about whether sex feels better for Latino men than black or white men.

Yet, R767, the rates in Europe where circumcision is less prevalent are much lower than the US where most boys are circumcised. The reason for the higher rate in Africa is lack of hygiene. If you are exposed and the virus has a chance to incubate over many days, then you will be more likely to contract HIV.

R69 the reason for the higher rate in Africa is a lack of condoms or any desire by men to use them.

Natural (intact) is best. No one arguing for "bizzare plastic surgery for the penis" ever takes into account those cases that go very badly, or in worst case scenario, leading to loss of the penis. (Dr.John Money's unfortunate patients who underwent sex-reassignment as a result are good examples to keep in mind).

An relative of mine was cut as an adult for idiot religious reasons. He regretted it. Said it had a huge effect on his sex life 'like permanent Novocaine" he said.

Because the penis, like all other of parts of the body was designed with function in mind. From an engineering perspective alone, it's clear why the uncircumcised penis is perfectly designed for long sessions of orgasmic sex without having to rely on friction and tons of lube. Do a little research into the history of this practice. It's not for hygiene and health reasons as they say.

R72 Permanent novocaine is right.

Cut guy here! I love dick - don’t get me wrong! - but have a definite preference for uncut cock - I think there’s nothing hotter!

I have noticed that in general - uncut guys tend to cum quicker when I blow them. But it’s not like I’m conducting a scientific, statistical survey here - just anecdotal from years of cocksucking....

I disagree with an earlier poster tho about phimosis being rare. I’ve encountered many uncut cocks over the years that had too-tight foreskins in varying degrees. Sometimes it really seemed to hurt the guy to even get hard - and it wasn’t possible to do much with them as any retraction if the skin too far seemed pretty painful. If that was me a if just gave it snipped. One earlier poster said there were stretching techniques and steroid creams to help this condition? That would probably be much better - I think any surgery unless absolutely necessary is stupid! - but would your average gp or urologist know and understand what’s involved here? Might be just easier to get circumcised?

Like 72 has posted - there is quote a lot of anecdotal evidence from guys who were originally uncircumcised and then became circumcised later on in adult life for whatever reason.

R76, please learn how to make references to previous replies. It's not difficult, and it's not like there aren't thousands of examples for you to work from.

Just fuck off R77 you nasty, posturing, self-important cunt.

Is that better?