Anyone know?
And Jesus Christ, why were they done like modeling shots?
Who Was The Hot Guy Actress Melissa Benoist Was Fucking In Her Leaked Fappening Photos?
Offsite Link
| by Anonymous | reply 20 | November 30, 2019 6:15 PM |
There's a hot guy actress? Is this another "trans" thing?
| by Anonymous | reply 1 | April 19, 2016 12:07 AM |
The guy is her ex-boyfriend
They look like modeling shots because I believe the bf was a professional artist or photographer
| by Anonymous | reply 2 | April 19, 2016 12:09 AM |
It's an English word order thing, R1, allowing to skip conjunctions such as "that".
| by Anonymous | reply 3 | April 19, 2016 12:12 AM |
Photographer Nick Vorderman.
| by Anonymous | reply 4 | April 19, 2016 12:16 AM |
The one with the dick is Nick Vorderman. I'd rather fuck him than Blake Jenner.
| by Anonymous | reply 5 | April 19, 2016 12:17 AM |
That is a relative pronoun, not a conjunction.
And you would use who, not that here.
| by Anonymous | reply 6 | April 19, 2016 12:18 AM |
She looks like she was enjoying it and begging for it. She's a whore.
| by Anonymous | reply 7 | April 19, 2016 12:22 AM |
They do look like modeling shots, which makes me wonder how they made them.
| by Anonymous | reply 8 | April 19, 2016 12:26 AM |
A gay man calling a woman a whore? That's rich
| by Anonymous | reply 9 | April 19, 2016 12:27 AM |
Those are strangely beautiful pictures. And kind of hot.
| by Anonymous | reply 10 | April 19, 2016 12:31 AM |
She's a bigger whore than Dan Savage and Terry Miller combined. At least they had the good sense to hide their faces in their hardcore shots.
| by Anonymous | reply 11 | April 19, 2016 12:33 AM |
A woman having sex with her boyfriend = whore
Men having sex with strangers in bathrooms = not whores
| by Anonymous | reply 12 | April 19, 2016 12:38 AM |
Everyone should be sex positive...unless, of course, they have a vagina.
| by Anonymous | reply 13 | April 19, 2016 1:19 AM |
R6 failed grammar nazi school.
"That' is a conjunction in syntax where its function is to introduce a subordinate clause. And it can be used for both people and objects.
It is a pronoun in morphology.
Syntax =/= morphology.
| by Anonymous | reply 14 | April 19, 2016 1:51 AM |
Wrong, r14. A conjunction connects clauses, phrases, etc, but performs no function in them. The missing word is not a conjunction but the subject of the dependent clause "Who was fucking her..."
| by Anonymous | reply 15 | April 19, 2016 2:05 AM |
[quote]She looks like she was enjoying it and begging for it. She's a whore.
Yeah, the comments at that site aren't much better than this. A girl having a good time having sex with her boyfriend totally deserves to have her pics leaked and posted on the internet and called a whore. What the fuck is the matter with people.
| by Anonymous | reply 16 | April 19, 2016 2:18 AM |
Jesus people! Let's get back to the hot guy actress please!
| by Anonymous | reply 17 | April 19, 2016 2:19 AM |
The missing word is the objective relative pronoun "whom." "Who" if you're being casual. But you don't need to express a relative pronoun you use as in the objective case.
| by Anonymous | reply 18 | April 19, 2016 2:31 AM |
I was probably r5.
| by Anonymous | reply 19 | November 30, 2019 2:29 PM |
He looks a bit like Theo James
| by Anonymous | reply 20 | November 30, 2019 6:15 PM |